Defecation in preparation for ecdysis drives microplastic clearance in cricket nymphs

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-ND-4.0
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

Plastic pollution is widespread in both terrestrial and marine environments, creating significant ecological concerns. Animals that occupy lower trophic levels, like many small insects, can ingest and retain plastics for extended periods before eliminating them. Ecdysis, or moulting, occurs in arthropods during development and facilitates growth, but its role in microplastic (MP) clearance, and whether it is impacted by plastics, are largely unexplored. We used the cricket Gryllodes sigillatus to examine how moulting influences MP clearance in a hemimetabolous species known to ingest and tolerate MPs throughout development. We tested two competing hypotheses of how moulting influences plastic clearance: (1) that moulting of the gut lining removes MPs, or (2) that cessation of feeding and purging frass before ecdysis occurs removes MPs. In doing so we also provide new evidence that cricket nymphs exhibit a cyclical (cosinor) pattern of frass production associated with ecdysis. MPs were eliminated from the cricket’s gut before ecdysis, driven by the cessation of feeding and cyclical frass production that clears the gut in preparation for ecdysis. We also observed that the timing of ecdysis and overall frass production remained unaffected by continuous MP ingestion, whereas switching between MP and non-MP diets caused modest changes in frass timing within an instar. Crickets are known to biofragment MPs into NPs, which, with gut-clearing, likely allows them to deposit plastic-laden frass rapidly and reduces the likelihood of upward trophic transfer by reducing plastic retention.
Full text 2,328 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract Plastic pollution is widespread in both terrestrial and marine environments, creating significant ecological concerns. Animals that occupy lower trophic levels, like many small insects, can ingest and retain plastics for extended periods before eliminating them. Ecdysis, or moulting, occurs in arthropods during development and facilitates growth, but its role in microplastic (MP) clearance, and whether it is impacted by plastics, are largely unexplored. We used the cricket Gryllodes sigillatus to examine how moulting influences MP clearance in a hemimetabolous species known to ingest and tolerate MPs throughout development. We tested two competing hypotheses of how moulting influences plastic clearance: (1) that moulting of the gut lining removes MPs, or (2) that cessation of feeding and purging frass before ecdysis occurs removes MPs. In doing so we also provide new evidence that cricket nymphs exhibit a cyclical (cosinor) pattern of frass production associated with ecdysis. MPs were eliminated from the cricket’s gut before ecdysis, driven by the cessation of feeding and cyclical frass production that clears the gut in preparation for ecdysis. We also observed that the timing of ecdysis and overall frass production remained unaffected by continuous MP ingestion, whereas switching between MP and non-MP diets caused modest changes in frass timing within an instar. Crickets are known to biofragment MPs into NPs, which, with gut-clearing, likely allows them to deposit plastic-laden frass rapidly and reduces the likelihood of upward trophic transfer by reducing plastic retention. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest. Footnotes Data availability All data is provided as a supplementary file for review, and the same file will be included as supplementary material should the manuscript be accepted for publication. Funding Information This research was supported by funding from a research agreement with Environment and Climate Change Canada and a Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada Discovery Grant (RGPIN-2018-05322) to HAM. Equipment used in this study was acquired through support from the Canadian Foundation for Innovation and Ontario Research Fund (to HAM). Conflict of Interest The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-28T02:00:01.590549+00:00
License: CC-BY-ND-4.0