Torsional Behaviour of High Strength Steel (S700) Rectangular Hollow Section Stub Column

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-4.0
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-17

This study numerically investigated the torsional behavior of S700 steel hollow sections, finding higher aspect ratios and increased wall thickness improve torsional resistance, and comparing results to existing design codes.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-17 · read from full text

The paper studied the torsional behavior of high-strength steel (S700) rectangular hollow section stub columns using numerical finite element modeling in ABAQUS, varying geometric parameters including cross-section aspect ratio and wall thickness. The authors report a two-stage validation, first verifying the torsional loading scheme with carbon steel RHS torsion tests and then validating the high-strength steel material model against axial compression test results on high-strength steel RHS. The key findings were that higher cross-section aspect ratio (SHS) produced greater torsional resistance than lower aspect ratio (RHS), and that increasing wall thickness improved performance across configurations, with FE results benchmarked against Eurocode and American Code and the Direct Strength Method to suggest improved accuracy. This paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Abstract This study investigates the torsional behavior of high strength steel (S700) rectangular hollow section stub columns. Numerical study was performed in ABAQUS to evaluate the influence of geometric parameters such as cross-section aspect ratio and thickness on torsional performance. A two stage validation of the numerical models were employed against test results available in literature. The torsional loading scheme was validated using torsion test results of carbon steel rectangular hollow section. The adopted high strength steel materials was further validated against test results on high strength steel rectangular hollow section (RHS) under axial compression. The study revealed that members with higher cross-section aspect ratio (SHS) exhibited superior torsional resistance than lower aspect ratio (RHS), while increasing wall thickness consistently enhanced performance across all configurations. Finally, the numerical results were benchmarked against existing design codes such as Eurocode & American Code and Direct Strength Method (DSM), revealing the potential for improved accuracy through FE-based studies. The findings offer critical insights for structural optimization and slight improvement of existing design approach for HSS-RHS under pure torsional loading.
Full text 13,285 characters · extracted from preprint-html · click to expand
Torsional Behaviour of High Strength Steel (S700) Rectangular Hollow Section Stub Column | Research Square window.SnipcartSettings = { analytics: { enabled: false } }; (function() { var accessVector = localStorage.getItem('access_vector') || ''; window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; if (accessVector) { window.dataLayer.push({ user: { profile: { profileInfo: { snid: accessVector } } } }); } })(); (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src='https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-K279D39R'); Browse Preprints In Review Journals COVID-19 Preprints AJE Video Bytes Research Tools Research Promotion AJE Professional Editing AJE Rubriq About Preprint Platform In Review Editorial Policies Our Team Advisory Board Help Center Sign In Submit a Preprint Cite Share Download PDF Article Torsional Behaviour of High Strength Steel (S700) Rectangular Hollow Section Stub Column Jonathan Vanlalruata, Sanasam Vipej Devi, Ricky Lalthazuala This is a preprint; it has not been peer reviewed by a journal. https://doi.org/ 10.21203/rs.3.rs-6937819/v1 This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License Status: Published Journal Publication published 17 Nov, 2025 Read the published version in Scientific Reports → Version 1 posted 12 You are reading this latest preprint version Abstract This study investigates the torsional behavior of high strength steel (S700) rectangular hollow section stub columns. Numerical study was performed in ABAQUS to evaluate the influence of geometric parameters such as cross-section aspect ratio and thickness on torsional performance. A two stage validation of the numerical models were employed against test results available in literature. The torsional loading scheme was validated using torsion test results of carbon steel rectangular hollow section. The adopted high strength steel materials was further validated against test results on high strength steel rectangular hollow section (RHS) under axial compression. The study revealed that members with higher cross-section aspect ratio (SHS) exhibited superior torsional resistance than lower aspect ratio (RHS), while increasing wall thickness consistently enhanced performance across all configurations. Finally, the numerical results were benchmarked against existing design codes such as Eurocode & American Code and Direct Strength Method (DSM), revealing the potential for improved accuracy through FE-based studies. The findings offer critical insights for structural optimization and slight improvement of existing design approach for HSS-RHS under pure torsional loading. Physical sciences/Engineering/Civil engineering Physical sciences/Materials science/Structural materials/Metals and alloys High Strength Steel Rectangular hollow section Torsion Finite Element Modelling Aspect ratio thickness Full Text Additional Declarations No competing interests reported. Cite Share Download PDF Status: Published Journal Publication published 17 Nov, 2025 Read the published version in Scientific Reports → Version 1 posted Editorial decision: Revision requested 26 Aug, 2025 Reviews received at journal 22 Aug, 2025 Reviews received at journal 14 Aug, 2025 Reviewers agreed at journal 12 Aug, 2025 Reviews received at journal 09 Aug, 2025 Reviewers agreed at journal 01 Aug, 2025 Reviewers agreed at journal 31 Jul, 2025 Reviewers invited by journal 28 Jul, 2025 Editor assigned by journal 28 Jul, 2025 Editor invited by journal 28 Jul, 2025 Submission checks completed at journal 06 Jul, 2025 First submitted to journal 20 Jun, 2025 You are reading this latest preprint version Research Square lets you share your work early, gain feedback from the community, and start making changes to your manuscript prior to peer review in a journal. As a division of Research Square Company, we’re committed to making research communication faster, fairer, and more useful. We do this by developing innovative software and high quality services for the global research community. Our growing team is made up of researchers and industry professionals working together to solve the most critical problems facing scientific publishing. Also discoverable on Platform About Our Team In Review Editorial Policies Advisory Board Help Center Resources Author Services Accessibility API Access RSS feed Manage Cookie Preferences © Research Square 2026 | ISSN 2693-5015 (online) Privacy Policy Terms of Service Do Not Sell My Personal Information {"props":{"pageProps":{"initialData":{"identity":"rs-6937819","acceptedTermsAndConditions":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"archivedVersions":[],"articleType":"Article","associatedPublications":[],"authors":[{"id":492109163,"identity":"8c04c0a7-9194-4900-9c21-28fc5a62d0dc","order_by":0,"name":"Jonathan Vanlalruata","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"National Institute of Technology, Mizoram","correspondingAuthor":true,"prefix":"","firstName":"Jonathan","middleName":"","lastName":"Vanlalruata","suffix":""},{"id":492109164,"identity":"5904eff8-caf2-4ee7-8dd5-e28349a374c7","order_by":1,"name":"Sanasam Vipej Devi","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Fuchsbau 37","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Sanasam","middleName":"Vipej","lastName":"Devi","suffix":""},{"id":492109165,"identity":"7ac1e6c3-6c24-4aba-8b93-588f760e4feb","order_by":2,"name":"Ricky Lalthazuala","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"National Institute of Technology, Mizoram","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Ricky","middleName":"","lastName":"Lalthazuala","suffix":""}],"badges":[],"createdAt":"2025-06-20 10:08:13","currentVersionCode":1,"declarations":"","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-6937819/v1","doiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-6937819/v1","draftVersion":[],"editorialEvents":[{"content":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-24041-4","type":"published","date":"2025-11-17T15:58:05+00:00"}],"editorialNote":"","failedWorkflow":false,"files":[{"id":96651259,"identity":"631cd7b3-0751-47c4-8552-54ecfabac9ff","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-11-24 16:14:12","extension":"pdf","order_by":1,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"manuscript-pdf","size":2527585,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"JonaPaper20062025.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-6937819/v1_covered_cc2f5643-3c60-4158-98ea-552aa4ce3316.pdf"}],"financialInterests":"No competing interests reported.","formattedTitle":"Torsional Behaviour of High Strength Steel (S700) Rectangular Hollow Section Stub Column","fulltext":[],"fulltextSource":"","fullText":"","funders":[],"hasAdminPriorityOnWorkflow":false,"hasManuscriptDocX":false,"hasOptedInToPreprint":true,"hasPassedJournalQc":"","hasAnyPriority":false,"hideJournal":false,"highlight":"","institution":"","isAcceptedByJournal":true,"isAuthorSuppliedPdf":true,"isDeskRejected":"","isHiddenFromSearch":false,"isInQc":false,"isInWorkflow":false,"isPdf":true,"isPdfUpToDate":true,"isWithdrawnOrRetracted":false,"journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"scientific-reports","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"externalIdentity":"scirep","sideBox":"Learn more about [Scientific Reports](http://www.nature.com/srep/)","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"","title":"Scientific Reports","twitterHandle":"","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":true,"editorialSystem":"stoa","reportingPortfolio":"Scientific Reports","inReviewEnabled":true,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true},"keywords":"High Strength Steel, Rectangular hollow section, Torsion, Finite Element Modelling, Aspect ratio, thickness","lastPublishedDoi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-6937819/v1","lastPublishedDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-6937819/v1","license":{"name":"CC BY 4.0","url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"manuscriptAbstract":"\u003cp\u003eThis study investigates the torsional behavior of high strength steel (S700) rectangular hollow section stub columns. Numerical study was performed in ABAQUS to evaluate the influence of geometric parameters such as cross-section aspect ratio and thickness on torsional performance. A two stage validation of the numerical models were employed against test results available in literature. The torsional loading scheme was validated using torsion test results of carbon steel rectangular hollow section. The adopted high strength steel materials was further validated against test results on high strength steel rectangular hollow section (RHS) under axial compression. The study revealed that members with higher cross-section aspect ratio (SHS) exhibited superior torsional resistance than lower aspect ratio (RHS), while increasing wall thickness consistently enhanced performance across all configurations. Finally, the numerical results were benchmarked against existing design codes such as Eurocode \u0026amp; American Code and Direct Strength Method (DSM), revealing the potential for improved accuracy through FE-based studies. The findings offer critical insights for structural optimization and slight improvement of existing design approach for HSS-RHS under pure torsional loading.\u003c/p\u003e","manuscriptTitle":"Torsional Behaviour of High Strength Steel (S700) Rectangular Hollow Section Stub Column","msid":"","msnumber":"","nonDraftVersions":[{"code":1,"date":"2025-07-31 03:46:53","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-6937819/v1","editorialEvents":[{"type":"communityComments","content":0},{"type":"decision","content":"Revision requested","date":"2025-08-26T07:05:12+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"editorInvitedReview","content":"","date":"2025-08-22T19:39:57+00:00","index":"hide","fulltext":""},{"type":"editorInvitedReview","content":"","date":"2025-08-14T10:35:10+00:00","index":"hide","fulltext":""},{"type":"reviewerAgreed","content":"305436138617746549742531434404964846054","date":"2025-08-12T06:14:39+00:00","index":"hide","fulltext":""},{"type":"editorInvitedReview","content":"","date":"2025-08-09T11:21:12+00:00","index":"hide","fulltext":""},{"type":"reviewerAgreed","content":"7379066245868555361658075116019275935","date":"2025-08-01T17:21:20+00:00","index":"hide","fulltext":""},{"type":"reviewerAgreed","content":"90771637180621997629090943595848696457","date":"2025-08-01T03:09:17+00:00","index":"hide","fulltext":""},{"type":"reviewersInvited","content":"","date":"2025-07-28T09:40:32+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"editorAssigned","content":"","date":"2025-07-28T09:38:01+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"editorInvited","content":"","date":"2025-07-28T09:25:59+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"checksComplete","content":"","date":"2025-07-07T00:54:44+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"submitted","content":"Scientific Reports","date":"2025-06-20T09:56:33+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""}],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"scientific-reports","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"externalIdentity":"scirep","sideBox":"Learn more about [Scientific Reports](http://www.nature.com/srep/)","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"","title":"Scientific Reports","twitterHandle":"","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":true,"editorialSystem":"stoa","reportingPortfolio":"Scientific Reports","inReviewEnabled":true,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true}}],"origin":"","ownerIdentity":"69ad4acb-e5c5-47d5-bc2b-644ce6ac5026","owner":[],"postedDate":"July 31st, 2025","published":true,"recentEditorialEvents":[],"rejectedJournal":[],"revision":"","amendment":"","status":"published-in-journal","subjectAreas":[{"id":52248686,"name":"Physical sciences/Engineering/Civil engineering"},{"id":52248687,"name":"Physical sciences/Materials science/Structural materials/Metals and alloys"}],"tags":[],"updatedAt":"2025-11-24T16:12:38+00:00","versionOfRecord":{"articleIdentity":"rs-6937819","link":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-24041-4","journal":{"identity":"scientific-reports","isVorOnly":false,"title":"Scientific Reports"},"publishedOn":"2025-11-17 15:58:05","publishedOnDateReadable":"November 17th, 2025"},"versionCreatedAt":"2025-07-31 03:46:53","video":"","vorDoi":"10.1038/s41598-025-24041-4","vorDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-24041-4","workflowStages":[]},"version":"v1","identity":"rs-6937819","journalConfig":"researchsquare"},"__N_SSP":true},"page":"/article/[identity]/[[...version]]","query":{"redirect":"/article/rs-6937819","identity":"rs-6937819","version":["v1"]},"buildId":"8U1c8b4HqxoKbykW_rLl7","isFallback":false,"isExperimentalCompile":false,"dynamicIds":[84888],"gssp":true,"scriptLoader":[]}

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: preprint-html

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-28T02:00:01.590549+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0