Rhythmic motor activity alleviates auditory attentional blinks

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-4.0

Abstract

SUMMARY Effective sensory processing relies on both attention and the motor system, yet whether motor activity could provide attention-like functions to regulate perception remains unknown. We hypothesized that rhythmic motor signals could provide phasic regulation of prioritizing and sampling perceptual targets. Using an auditory attentional blink paradigm that created a temporal deficit in selective attention, we found that temporally aligned finger tapping improved the probe detection during the attentional blink window but impaired performance when attentional resources were abundant. Furthermore, transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) over the right sensorimotor cortex alleviated attentional blink when the probe was close to the peak of the stimulation, whereas stimulation over the left aggravated attentional blink when the probe was close to the trough. These results suggest that the motor system is a resource-dependent rhythmic regulator of attentional sampling. Motor signals can override attentional bottlenecks, suggesting the motor system as an active shaper of cognitive processes.
Full text 1,198 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
SUMMARY Effective sensory processing relies on both attention and the motor system, yet whether motor activity could provide attention-like functions to regulate perception remains unknown. We hypothesized that rhythmic motor signals could provide phasic regulation of prioritizing and sampling perceptual targets. Using an auditory attentional blink paradigm that created a temporal deficit in selective attention, we found that temporally aligned finger tapping improved the probe detection during the attentional blink window but impaired performance when attentional resources were abundant. Furthermore, transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) over the right sensorimotor cortex alleviated attentional blink when the probe was close to the peak of the stimulation, whereas stimulation over the left aggravated attentional blink when the probe was close to the trough. These results suggest that the motor system is a resource-dependent rhythmic regulator of attentional sampling. Motor signals can override attentional bottlenecks, suggesting the motor system as an active shaper of cognitive processes. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-28T02:00:01.590549+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0