A multicentre randomised controlled trial assessing the costs and benefits of using structured information and analysis of women's preferences in the management of menorrhagia

Andrew Kennedy, Mark Sculpher, Angela Coulter, Nuala Dwyer, Matthew Rees, Stephen Horsley, Deborah S. Cowley, Christine Kidson, C. Kirwin, Caroline Naish, Ken Bidgood, J. Cullimore, R.H.J. Kerr-Wilson, Keith R. Abrams, Gordon M. Stirrat
In: Health Technology Assessment · 2003 · vol. 7(8) , pp. 1–76 · doi:10.3310/hta7080 · PMID:12633525 · W2319448301
review OA: diamond CC0 ⤵ 3 in-corpus citations
🔓 Open OA copy View on OpenAlex View on PubMed View at publisher
⚙ AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-08 ⓘ

This multicenter randomized trial evaluated the costs and benefits of incorporating structured information and patient preference analysis into menorrhagia management.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

T he NHS R&D Health Technology Assessment (HTA) Programme was set up in 1993 to ensure that high-quality research information on the costs, effectiveness and broader impact of health technologies is produced in the most efficient way for those who

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (51)

Cited by (3)

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK