Cross-species meta-analysis reveals determinants of homing gene drive performance

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-4.0

Abstract

Homing gene drives can bias their inheritance above Mendelian expectations, but reported outcomes vary widely. We compiled a cross-species dataset of nearly one million scored progeny from 42 publications reporting CRISPR/Cas9 endonuclease-based gene drives in 10 model, pest, and vector species. Using multilevel meta-analytic models, we evaluate biological, cross, and transgene design factors as predictors of biased drive inheritance. Species is the strongest predictor, but most heterogeneity remains unexplained; design features each explain a modest fraction of the remaining variation, with large construct-to-construct differences pointing to the full combination of design choices rather than any single factor. Nuclease expression timing, the most common optimization target, has limited predictive value after accounting for correlated factors, and predictions do not transfer well between species. Maternal nuclease deposition has a marginal effect on drive inheritance but dramatically increases somatic phenotype rates in offspring, revealing a tissue-of-action rather than repair-outcome effect. An interactive web tool enables community analysis of this dataset, which will guide the design of more efficient gene drives for genetic vector control, invasive species management and other applications. https://sverkuijl.shinyapps.io/GeneDrive/
Full text 1,502 characters · extracted from oa-html · click to expand
Abstract Homing gene drives can bias their inheritance above Mendelian expectations, but reported outcomes vary widely. We compiled a cross-species dataset of nearly one million scored progeny from 42 publications reporting CRISPR/Cas9 endonuclease-based gene drives in 10 model, pest, and vector species. Using multilevel meta-analytic models, we evaluate biological, cross, and transgene design factors as predictors of biased drive inheritance. Species is the strongest predictor, but most heterogeneity remains unexplained; design features each explain a modest fraction of the remaining variation, with large construct-to-construct differences pointing to the full combination of design choices rather than any single factor. Nuclease expression timing, the most common optimization target, has limited predictive value after accounting for correlated factors, and predictions do not transfer well between species. Maternal nuclease deposition has a marginal effect on drive inheritance but dramatically increases somatic phenotype rates in offspring, revealing a tissue-of-action rather than repair-outcome effect. An interactive web tool enables community analysis of this dataset, which will guide the design of more efficient gene drives for genetic vector control, invasive species management and other applications. https://sverkuijl.shinyapps.io/GeneDrive/ Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest. Footnotes ↵+ These authors jointly supervised this work

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-html

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-28T02:00:01.590549+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0