Evaluation and Benchmarking of Generative and Agentic AI Systems: A Comprehensive Survey
preprint
OA: closed
CC-BY-4.0
Abstract
The rapid emergence of generative and agentic artificial intelligence (AI) has outpaced traditional evaluation practices. While large language models excel on static language benchmarks, real-world deployment demands more than accuracy on curated tasks. Agentic systems use planning, tool invocation, memory, and multi-agent collaboration to perform complex workflows. Enterprise adoption therefore hinges on holistic assessments that include cost, latency, reliability, safety, and multi-agent coordination. This survey provides a comprehensive taxonomy of evaluation dimensions, reviews existing benchmarks for generative and agentic systems, identifies gaps between laboratory tests and production requirements, and proposes future directions for more realistic, multi-dimensional benchmarking.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-05-28T02:00:01.590549+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0