Abstract
DNA double-crossover (DX) molecules, comprising two Holliday junctions connected by two duplex arms, are fundamental building blocks of DNA nanostructures, but their mechanical properties remain poorly understood. Here we investigate the elasticity of isolated antiparallel DX motifs with 18 to 22 base pairs between the crossovers. Using mechanical models parameterized by extensive all-atom molecular dynamics simulations, we demonstrate that the bending rigidity of the duplexes within a DX motif is highly anisotropic, and that this anisotropy results from long-range elastic couplings involving all the duplex base pairs between the crossovers. The duplex stretch modulus decreases due to localized defects, while the twist stiffness is close to that of an isolated duplex. The DX core as a whole follows an analytical beam theory in bending but not in torsion. Our results extend beyond local elastic models of DNA nanostructures and pave the way for probing peculiar mechanical properties of other key motifs for DNA and RNA nanotechnology.
Full text
1,134 characters
· extracted from
oa-doi-fallback
· click to expand
Abstract
DNA double-crossover (DX) molecules, comprising two Holliday junctions connected by two duplex arms, are fundamental building blocks of DNA nanostructures, but their mechanical properties remain poorly understood. Here we investigate the elasticity of isolated antiparallel DX motifs with 18 to 22 base pairs between the crossovers. Using mechanical models parameterized by extensive all-atom molecular dynamics simulations, we demonstrate that the bending rigidity of the duplexes within a DX motif is highly anisotropic, and that this anisotropy results from long-range elastic couplings involving all the duplex base pairs between the crossovers. The duplex stretch modulus decreases due to localized defects, while the twist stiffness is close to that of an isolated duplex. The DX core as a whole follows an analytical beam theory in bending but not in torsion. Our results extend beyond local elastic models of DNA nanostructures and pave the way for probing peculiar mechanical properties of other key motifs for DNA and RNA nanotechnology.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
(via DOI)
is the canonical version.