A Comparative Study of "Internet +" Case-based Learning and Traditional Case-based Learning in an Integrated Instructional Mode
preprint
OA: closed
CC-BY-4.0
Abstract
Objective: To study the difference between "Internet +" case-based learning (CBL) and traditional CBL in the clinical pathophysiology and therapeutic (CPPT) teaching mode and to provide a foundation and basis for medical teaching reform. Methods: In August 2022, fourth-year students of the First Clinical College of Wuhan University received a "Learning Experience" survey to evaluate the teaching satisfaction and learning harvest of both CBL methods. Results: Overall, "Internet +" group has higher scores in both teaching satisfaction and learning harvest. "Internet +" CBL can improve students' ability to utilize knowledge, collect information and work as a team. However, traditional CBL might reduce the study burden, provide more spare time, and challenge their ability of self-discipline. Conclusion: Under the CPPT teaching mode, "Internet +" CBL are superior to traditional CBL in different degrees. The "Internet +" CBL promising to be put into practice as a new educational mode, but with attention to the issue of learning burden.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-05-19T01:45:01.086888+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-05-28T02:00:01.590549+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0