Different cardiovascular effects of progestins according to structure and activity
review
OA: closed
CC0
⤵ 1 in-corpus citation
AI-generated summary
Synthetic progestins used in HRT exhibit diverse cardiovascular effects based on their structure, with some reversing estrogen's benefits while others, like drospirenone, show neutral or beneficial impacts.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
Following the publication of the Women's Health Initiative study, the controversy was raised regarding the role of progestins in hormonal replacement therapy (HRT). Some of the most prescribed molecules, with partial androgenic or glucocorticoid activity, have been shown to oppose partially the beneficial effect of estrogens on surrogate markers of cardiovascular disease risk. Unfortunately, this concern has been directed towards progestins as a class effect, although striking differences exist among the types of molecules used. The synthetic progestins used in HRT have varying pharmacologic properties depending on the molecules from which they are derived, either testosterone or progesterone. Very small structural changes in these molecules may induce considerable difference in their effects on various targets and especially on the surrogate markers of cardiovascular disease risk, where some molecules may reverse the beneficial effects of estrogen. Natural progesterone and some of its derivatives such as the 19-norprogesterone molecules or the new molecules drospirenone, a potent antimineralocorticoid agent with a beneficial effect on blood pressure, and dienogest do not exert any androgenic effect and have no negative effect on the lipids or on the endothelial cells. Although it is likely that the new progestins may be neutral on the coronary disease risk, when administered to the younger postmenopausal woman, this has not as yet been documented by large, randomized, controlled trials.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood (sparse)
Too few in-corpus citations on either side for a chart; here are the lists.
Cites (1)
Cited by (1)
References (19)
- New progestagens for contraceptive use via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2007.01.027 via openalex
- doi:10.1093/humrep/dem109 via openalex
- doi:10.1001/jama.297.13.1465 via openalex
- doi:10.1161/hc4801.099737 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.amjcard.2007.01.042 via openalex
- doi:10.1161/atvbaha.108.178004 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0039-128x(00)00174-4 via openalex
- doi:10.1160/th07-12-0746 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0002-9378(98)70149-8 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.maturitas.2005.05.006 via openalex
- doi:10.1001/jama.288.3.321 via openalex
- doi:10.1161/atvbaha.108.182337 via openalex
- doi:10.1056/nejm199906103402306 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)57909-6 via openalex
- doi:10.1001/jama.1995.03520270033028 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.maturitas.2005.10.004 via openalex
- doi:10.1161/circulationaha.104.501502 via openalex
- doi:10.1097/gme.0b013e318156f803 via openalex
Cited by (1)
Source provenance
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-05-11T06:12:37.668444+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-06-02T02:00:03.124865+00:00
License: CC0
· commercial use OK