Experimental metal contamination reduces gut microbiota diversity and alters its composition and function in wild-caught fish

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-4.0
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher
Full text 1,889 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract Wild organisms face environmental stressors that can interact and affect their health unexpectedly. Evidence suggests that responses to stressors may be mediated by changes in the gut microbiota, with cascading effects on host health. However, the combined effects of multiple stressors on host microbiota are still overlooked. Here, we investigated the single and interactive effects of realistic metal contamination (i.e., a mixture of Cd, Cu, Zn) and an immune challenge (i.e., lipopolysaccharides - LPS and phytohaemagglutinin - PHA) mimicking a parasite attack on the taxonomic and functional diversity and composition of gut microbiota among several wild freshwater fish (Gobio occitaniae) populations sampled along a gradient of contamination in streams. We found that the experimental metal contamination strongly altered the gut microbial community, with no interaction with the immune secondary stressor. Indeed, metal contamination reduced both taxonomic and functional gut microbial diversity, affecting the microbial community’s taxonomic and functional composition, with predicted consequences for their functional role in fish. Metal contamination reduced microbial function related to molecule biosyntheses (e.g., cell structure and amino acid precursors) while increasing functions associated with energy production (e.g., anaerobic respiration). In addition, populations sampled along a gradient of pollution in the wild did not differ in their response, suggesting a consistent impact of contaminants irrespective of the host’s past exposure to pollution. Our results highlight how realistic levels of metal contamination alter the fish gut microbiota, potentially affecting their ability to cope with environmental stressors, though long-term fitness implications are still unclear. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-28T02:00:01.590549+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0