Abstract
(PLoS NTD word limit = 300, current word count =300) 22
Background
Trachoma causes blindness due to repeated conjunctival infection by Chlamydia 23
trachomatis (Ct). Transmission intensity is estimated, for programmatic decision-making, by 24
prevalence of the clinical sign trachomatous inflammation—follicular (TF) in children aged 1–9 25
years. Research into complementary indicators to field-graded TF includes work on conjunctival 26
photography, tests for ocular Ct infection, and serology. The perceived acceptability and 27
feasibility of these indicators among a variety of stakeholders is unknown. 28
Methodology: Focus group discussions (FGDs) with community members and in-depth 29
interviews (IDIs) with public health practitioners in Tanzania were conducted. FGDs explored 30
themes including participants' experience with, and thoughts about, different diagnostic 31
approaches. The framework method for content analysis was used. IDIs yielded lists of perceived 32
strengths of, and barriers to, implementation for programmatic use of each indicator. These were 33
used to form an online quantitative survey on complementary indicators distributed to global 34
stakeholders via meetings, mailing lists, and social media posts. 35
Results
Sixteen FGDs and 11 IDIs were conducted in October–November 2022. In general, all 36
proposed sample methods were deemed acceptable by community members. Common themes 37
included not wanting undue discomfort and a preference for tests perceived as accurate. Health 38
workers noted the importance of community education for some sample types. The online survey 39
was conducted in April–May 2023 with 98 starting the questionnaire and 81 completing it. 40
Regarding barriers to implementing diagnostics, the highest agreement items related to 41
feasibility, rather than acceptability. No evidence of significant differences was found in 42
responses pertaining to community acceptability based on participant characteristics. 43
Conclusions
All of the indicators included were generally deemed acceptable by all 44
stakeholders in Tanzania, although community education around the benefits and risks of 45
different sample types, as well as addressing issues around feasibility, will be key to successful, 46
sustainable integration of these indicators into trachoma programs. 47
48
49
. CC-BY 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted February 1, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.01.29.24301764doi: medRxiv preprint
3
Author Summary (limit = 200, current =200) 50
Trachoma is a disease that causes blindness through conjunctival infection with the bacterium 51
Chlamydia trachomatis. Trachoma is targeted for global elimination by 2030. To know whether 52
population-level interventions are required, we must know how intensely conjunctival C. 53
trachomatis is being transmitted in a population. The current proxy recommended by the World 54
Health Organization is prevalence of a clinical sign of active (inflammatory) trachoma: 55
trachomatous inflammation—follicular. However, this indicator has several drawbacks. Policy-56
makers are considering the utility of a number of complementary indicators, including 57
conjunctival photography and tests for infection and serology. 58
We sought the opinions of different stakeholders to determine the acceptability and feasibility of 59
complementary indicators for use in trachoma programs. In Tanzania, we undertook focus group 60
discussions with community members and in-depth interviews with public health practitioners. 61
We also conducted an online survey of global stakeholders. We found that all the proposed test 62
types were acceptable to stakeholders in Tanzania; common themes included not wanting undue 63
discomfort and a preference for test types perceived to be accurate. Community education and 64
building trust was deemed critical. From the online survey, the most agreed-upon barriers to 65
implementation of each method were related to concerns about feasibility, rather than 66
acceptability. 67
. CC-BY 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted February 1, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.01.29.24301764doi: medRxiv preprint
4
Introduction
68
Trachoma is a neglected tropical disease (NTD) that causes blindness as a result of 69
repeated conjunctival infection by the bacterium Chlamydia trachomatis (Ct).1 Transmission 70
intensity is estimated, for programmatic decision-making, via field grading of the clinical sign 71
trachomatous inflammation—follicular (TF). A major goal of the World Health Organization 72
(WHO) Alliance for the Global Elimination of Trachoma is the reduction of TF prevalence in 1–73
9-year-olds (TF1–9) to <5% in all formerly endemic districts worldwide, contributing to the 74
achievement of global elimination of trachoma as a public health problem.2 A key component of 75
the WHO-recommended SAFE (surgery, antibiotics, promotion of facial cleanliness and 76
environmental improvement) strategy that is designed to be used to achieve this target is mass 77
drug administration (MDA) of antibiotics to clear infection. The number of MDA rounds is 78
dependent on the category of TF1–9 within an evaluation unit (generally equivalent to a district) 79
as measured by population-based prevalence surveys3 on the assumption that TF1–9 is well-80
correlated with prevalence of Ct infection. 81
However, TF1–9 has several limitations as the sole indicator for trachoma. First, the 82
relationship between TF1–9 and infection is not predictable,4 especially post-MDA,5 and the 83
reduction in TF1–9 often lags behind the reduction in Ct infection.6 Second, conjunctival follicles 84
(the features that lead to a diagnosis of TF) are not necessarily specific to trachoma, sometimes 85
occurring due to other causes.7 Furthermore, in areas with low prevalence of trachoma, it 86
becomes both costlier to train field graders8 and more difficult for graders to pass the inter-grader 87
agreement test.9-11 88
There has been ongoing research into indicators that could be alternative or 89
complementary to TF, including conjunctival photography,12 tests for ocular Ct infection,5 and 90
serology to assess an individuals’ previous exposure to Ct infection by detecting antibodies to the 91
. CC-BY 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted February 1, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.01.29.24301764doi: medRxiv preprint
5
pathogen.13 It is important to note that each of these indicators measures a different signal: 92
clinical grading (both field-based and through photography) measures signs of inflammation, 93
infection tests are a direct measure of current infection with Ct, and serology measures a history 94
of previous exposure to the pathogen. Therefore, each of these indicators could provide different 95
measures of the public-health threat caused by trachoma; i.e., indicators should be considered 96
"complementary" rather than "alternative" to each other. 97
Following a WHO meeting in 2016 reviewing existing data, it was concluded that there 98
was insufficient evidence to support routine use of Ct infection or serology tests to inform 99
trachoma elimination programs.14 However, a WHO informal workshop in December 2021 100
supported the use of age-stratified data on Ct infection and serological data on the presence of 101
anti-Ct antibodies for decision-making in districts where TF1–9 either remains at or above the 5% 102
elimination threshold at the second impact survey (districts with "persistent" TF) following 103
MDA interventions, or falls <5% but subsequently returns to ≥ 5% during the surveillance period 104
after cessation of MDA (districts with "recrudescent" TF).15 105
WHO is now producing guidelines on the use of serology in trachoma elimination 106
programs. As part of the guideline development process, the Guideline Development Group must 107
consider both the acceptability of the proposed intervention and the values and preferences of the 108
people affected by the recommendations, which will partially determine the strength of any 109
recommendations.16 Research to date has indicated the value complementary indicators could 110
have for trachoma surveillance purposes. A literature review assessing post-elimination 111
surveillance systems for multiple diseases, including trachoma, suggested that opportunities for 112
inclusion of infection testing and serological markers in trachoma elimination settings continue 113
to be explored.17 A 2019 survey of stakeholders found that the top-cited barrier to trachoma 114
. CC-BY 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted February 1, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.01.29.24301764doi: medRxiv preprint
6
eradication is inadequate surveillance tools and systems to monitor for recrudescence.18 While 115
eradication is a different goal than elimination as a public health problem, the need for practical 116
strategies to measure trachoma after the cessation of MDA remains. 117
With 2030 as the target for global elimination of trachoma as a public health problem,19 a 118
better understanding of the acceptability and feasibility of complementary indicators for 119
trachoma detection by all stakeholders is urgently needed. In this study, we aimed to determine 120
the opinion of a wide variety of stakeholders through a mixed-methods approach: a qualitative 121
study of community members and public health practitioners in Tanzania, followed by a 122
quantitative online global survey of stakeholders. 123
Methods
124
Qualitative study in Tanzania 125
Ethics 126
The qualitative study was approved by the London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine 127
Research Ethics Committee (Ref: 28028), the Task Force for Global Health ethical review body, 128
and Tanzania's National Institute of Medical Research (Ref: NIMR/HQ/R.8a/Vol.IX/4123). 129
Work was conducted in collaboration with Tanzania's health ministry through the National NTD 130
Control Programme, region- and district-level health departments, and village leaders. Written, 131
informed consent was obtained from all participants prior to their inclusion by trained research 132
assistants fluent in the local languages (Swahili and/or Maa) with an impartial witness present for 133
illiterate participants. Permission to record the focus group discussions (FGDs) and in-depth 134
interviews (IDIs) and publish quotes was obtained at enrollment. 135
Setting/Sampling 136
Tanzania was chosen based on the support of its health ministry, history and strength of its 137
trachoma program, presence of districts with persistent and recrudescent TF as well as districts 138
. CC-BY 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted February 1, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.01.29.24301764doi: medRxiv preprint
7
having met the elimination threshold, and access to the "Maasai corridor", an area spanning the 139
Kenya-Tanzania border with high levels of persistent and recrudescent TF among pastoralists 140
including the Maasai ethnic group. FGDs with community members were conducted in four 141
districts in Tanzania, consisting of two districts with TF1–9 <5% and two with TF1–9 ≥ 5% at most 142
recent survey, chosen to be representative of pre- and post-elimination settings. Districts were 143
chosen in three selected regions (Dodoma, Singida, and Arusha) to ensure a diversity of 144
trachoma program experience, geographic location, and ethnic group. The current TF1–9 category 145
in Tanzania and the four selected districts are shown in Figure 1. Within each chosen district, 146
two villages were randomly selected for the FGDs by assembling a list of all villages in each 147
district, assigning each village a random number, and selecting the two villages with the lowest 148
randomly generated numbers. 149
. CC-BY 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted February 1, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.01.29.24301764doi: medRxiv preprint
8
Figure 1: Map of the four districts selected for the study and their current trachomatous 150
inflammation—follicular (TF) prevalence category in children 1–9-years-old, Tanzania. The 151
boundaries and names shown and the designations used on this map do not imply the expression 152
of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the authors, or the institutions with which they are 153
affiliated, concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, 154
or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Prevalence map source: Trachoma 155
Atlas.20 156
157
158
For the FGDs, community members aged 18–60 years who had experience caring for children 159
were eligible to participate. Participants were identified using a snowball sampling approach,21 160
with index participants chosen by the village leader. Snowball sampling continued until the 161
target group size (n=10) for each FGD was reached. Separate FGDs were held with men and 162
women. 163
IDIs were conducted with public health practitioners in Tanzania. We sought interviews with a 164
wide variety of public health practitioners, including laboratory personnel, NTD program 165
officers, and non-governmental organization (NGO) program staff at all levels. Participants were 166
. CC-BY 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted February 1, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.01.29.24301764doi: medRxiv preprint
9
selected based on experience working in NTD programs and their availability, with a target of 2–167
3 respondents for each of the three regions selected for FGDs, plus practitioners at the national 168
level who were based in Dodoma. 169
Data collection 170
FGDs and IDIs were conducted by trained research assistants in the participants' preferred 171
language using pre-designed topic guides (Supplemental File 1), exploring themes such as 172
previous experience with each of the test types: TF status via field grading and photography, 173
infection testing, and serology, as well as (for community members) thoughts about the different 174
sample collection methods: field grading, conjunctival photography, eye swabs, and dried blood 175
spots, and (for public health practitioners) thoughts about the feasibility of each test type. In the 176
FGDs, visual aids were used to help participants understand the different sample collection 177
methods. Sessions were recorded using an electronic audio recorder, transcribed by a native 178
speaker and then translated by them into English. Translations were checked for accuracy by the 179
researcher who carried out data collection. 180
Data analysis 181
Transcripts were entered into the qualitative data management software Nvivo22 and coded based 182
on both an a priori list of codes pertaining to each test type (Supplemental File 2) as well as 183
broader emergent themes. The framework method for content analysis23 was used to chart data 184
into a framework matrix. For the FGDs, comparative analysis was done to compare responses 185
between communities based on gender and setting (TF1–9 ≥ 5% or TF1–9 <5%). The coding 186
framework and analysis plan were reviewed by a second researcher prior to finalization of 187
analysis. For the IDIs, responses pertaining to strengths and barriers for each of the sample types 188
were used to formulate the stakeholder survey questionnaire. 189
. CC-BY 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted February 1, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.01.29.24301764doi: medRxiv preprint
10
Quantitative survey of stakeholders 190
Ethics 191
The quantitative survey was approved by the London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine 192
Research Ethics Committee (Ref: 28589) and the Task Force for Global Health ethical review 193
body. Informed consent was obtained electronically in the preferred language of the participant, 194
from the four languages available: English, Spanish, French, and Portuguese. All questions 195
(other than consent) were optional, and the survey responses were anonymous. At the end of the 196
survey window, survey data were downloaded from SurveyMonkey24 prior to deletion of the 197
survey and data from the platform. 198
Setting/sampling 199
Stakeholders working in trachoma, including national program coordinators or other national 200
program staff, members of NGOs, donor organizations, and academic organizations were asked 201
to participate in an online survey to assess their agreement with the strengths and barriers to each 202
test type identified by the IDIs with Tanzanian public health practitioners. Stakeholders were 203
required to be over the age of 18 years. A list of email addresses of stakeholders meeting these 204
inclusion criteria was assembled using publicly available sources, such as organizational 205
websites, publications, and meeting reports with participant lists. Snowball sampling was 206
employed by asking key members of partner organizations to recommend additional 207
stakeholders. We solicited responses from as many people as possible who met our criteria. 208
Data collection 209
The online survey began during the annual meeting of the WHO Alliance for the Global 210
Elimination of Trachoma by 2020 (GET2020) held in Istanbul, Turkïye, in April 2023. The 211
GET2020 meeting convenes a variety of stakeholders; representatives from all trachoma-212
endemic, formerly-endemic, and suspected-endemic countries are invited, as well as members of 213
related NGOs and academic or research organizations. The survey was hosted on 214
. CC-BY 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted February 1, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.01.29.24301764doi: medRxiv preprint
11
SurveyMonkey.24 A link to the survey was available via email sent to the previously assembled 215
list of email addresses, through advertisements at the GET2020 meeting, and through a post on 216
the social media platform X (formerly known as Twitter) from EMHE. Prior to the start of the 217
survey window, the survey was piloted with colleagues with expertise in trachoma and online 218
survey forms to gain feedback on the questionnaire and the ease of using the survey platform. 219
The questionnaire (Supplemental File 3) included questions on the participant's age group, 220
gender identity, organizational role, primary country/countries of trachoma work, level of 221
agreement with the importance of various perceived barriers to implementation at the program 222
level and strengths for different complementary indicators on a 5-point Likert scale (with the 223
options of: Strongly Agree, Agree, Neither Agree nor Disagree, Disagree, Strongly Disagree), 224
and identification of further knowledge gaps remaining, entered as free text, that may prevent 225
implementation of these indicators for trachoma surveillance. The strengths and barriers 226
presented in the questionnaire were obtained from the responses of IDI participants. 227
Data analysis 228
Descriptive analysis was performed using R.25 Since the total target population is unknown (due 229
to the survey being publicly available via an online link) no response rate could be calculated. 230
Frequency tables were created to determine the percent of respondents that strongly agreed or 231
agreed with, neither agreed nor disagreed with, and disagreed or strongly disagreed with each 232
proposed strength and barrier. The "strongly agree" and "agree" responses were combined and 233
the "strongly disagree" and "disagree" responses were combined to determine the percent of 234
respondents who agreed or disagreed with a statement, respectively. In order to determine if 235
responses pertaining to community acceptability differed between national program staff and 236
other stakeholders, responses pertaining to these barriers were analyzed on the basis of the 237
participant's organizational and personal role (country staff, as defined as a respondent whose 238
. CC-BY 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted February 1, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.01.29.24301764doi: medRxiv preprint
12
organizational role was "Government" and personal role was "Programmatic/Implementation", 239
compared to all other stakeholders) by calculating the median and interquartile range (IQR) of 240
responses to these questions. The 2-tailed Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used to calculate p-values 241
comparing the responses of the two groups. Key knowledge gaps entered by respondents as free 242
text responses were cleaned and aggregated. 243
Results
244
Qualitative study in Tanzania 245
Data collection took place in Tanzania from October to November 2022. A total of 160 246
community members participated in 16 FGDs, with ten people per FGD. The reported population 247
of selected villages ranged from roughly 1,100 to 5,400. Equal numbers of men and women 248
participated. Fourteen FGDs were conducted in Swahili and two were conducted in Maa. A total 249
of 11 public health practitioners participated in IDIs. The roles of participants included current 250
and former country-level staff, NGO staff, lab technicians, regional NTD coordinators, and one 251
healthcare worker. The framework matrix used to assess community responses for each test type 252
by gender and setting is provided as Supplemental File 4. 253
TF field grading 254
According to community members in Tanzania, key advantages of field grading of TF were the 255
familiarity of this method (particularly noted in FGDs with women), the lack of pain or adverse 256
consequences from this method, and the ability to receive results immediately. A perceived 257
disadvantage of field grading of TF, mentioned in half of the FGDs, was the possibility of short-258
term discomfort or adverse consequences that may be caused by the strong light of torches used 259
as part of the field grading process: 260
. CC-BY 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted February 1, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.01.29.24301764doi: medRxiv preprint
13
"I think that [the] examination method of being graded with torches causes effects. For example, 261
eyes turn red and keeps on shedding a lot of tears after a certain period of time. I recommend that 262
they should innovate a new method for trachoma examination." (31– 35-year-old woman, TF1–9 263
<5% district) 264
In the IDIs, most of the public health practitioners who provided advantages of field grading of 265
TF mentioned that this method is both familiar and acceptable to communities, which agrees 266
with community feedback from the FGDs. Very few IDIs mentioned any disadvantages with 267
field grading of TF, and most disadvantages related to general concerns with needing to train 268
staff to conduct the examination, which is not necessarily specific to this method. None of the 269
IDIs mentioned the possibility that communities may dislike this method due to fear of adverse 270
consequences from the torch used as part of the examination. 271
Conjunctival photography 272
A majority of FGDs mentioned that a key advantage of conjunctival photography is a perceived 273
increase in the accuracy of grading via photo versus field grading due to the ability for graders to 274
have ample time: 275
“It is possible that [TF field grading] won’t be conducted as it is required because you are in [a] 276
hurry but when you are taking a photo it is a good thing because a person who will examine that 277
photo will have plenty of time to do that.” (26–30-year-old man, TF1–9 <5% district) 278
Other advantages of conjunctival photography mentioned by FGD participants were the 279
familiarity with the concept of imaging for diagnostics, and the lack of pain and adverse 280
consequences from this method. Each of these advantages was particularly often noted in the 281
. CC-BY 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted February 1, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.01.29.24301764doi: medRxiv preprint
14
FGDs with men. A majority of FGDs (particularly with men) mentioned that a key disadvantage 282
is a fear of long-term adverse consequences caused by the photo flash: 283
“Some people are worried that when you are photographed you will go blind or your eye will be 284
destroyed.” (46–50-year-old man, TF1–9 <5% district) 285
Several FGDs (particularly those with men) also indicated a belief that conjunctival photography 286
is not as accurate as other methods: 287
“A photo is not enough; we would like to get another examination method because the camera 288
won’t show the disease that I have in my eyes or in my eyelid clearly.” (31–35-year-old woman, 289
TF1–9 <5% district) 290
None of the FGD participants mentioned that they had concerns related to confidentiality, usage 291
of the photos, or the potential identifiability of photos taken. 292
In the IDIs, none of the respondents mentioned a high level of community acceptability of 293
conjunctival photography as a specific strength of this method. Several IDI participants 294
mentioned that community fears related to flash photography causing adverse consequences and 295
mistrust that the entire face would be photographed (leading to concerns by community members 296
around the confidentiality of their and their children’s images) may be potential barriers to this 297
method. Several mentioned that education would be needed in order for communities to 298
participate: 299
"The most important thing is to give education and sensitization. If you will just tell a parent that 300
you want to take a photo, he/she might think you have [a] hidden agenda with the child." 301
(Program coordinator) 302
. CC-BY 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted February 1, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.01.29.24301764doi: medRxiv preprint
15
In terms of feasibility, while there was an acknowledgement from a few IDI participants that the 303
fragility of camera equipment may be a concern in the field, most indicated that this would not 304
be a true barrier to implementation, especially given the benefits of conjunctival photography. 305
Eye swabs 306
A majority of FGDs mentioned increased perceived test accuracy (especially compared to field 307
or photo grading) as a key advantage of tests for ocular Ct infection. Half of FGDs (particularly 308
those with men) indicated that an advantage of the test for ocular Ct infection is that this method 309
is perceived as modern, high-tech, "professional", and/or legitimate (as it is approved by an 310
authorizing body prior to use). 311
Most FGDs (particularly those with men) mentioned that a key disadvantage of eye swabs is a 312
fear of long-term adverse consequences from the test procedure: 313
"I won’t agree with the use of eye swab method, I will even tell my family members not to 314
participate in that method because it has effects, it may leave you with a wound in the eye." (31–315
35-year-old-man, TF1–9 ≥ 5% district) 316
In addition, half of FGDs (particularly those with men) mentioned a fear of pain from the test 317
procedure, especially with regard to children. Several FGDs indicated that the complicated 318
nature of the test (with the need for sample collection, storage, and testing) may cause test errors 319
or failures. 320
From the IDIs, many respondents said that eye swabs would be acceptable to communities only 321
with proper education as to the risks and benefits of participation. Some IDI respondents said 322
that training would be needed in order for the sample collector to not harm the eyes of 323
. CC-BY 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted February 1, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.01.29.24301764doi: medRxiv preprint
16
participants, with the importance of this being two-fold: to minimize harm to participants and 324
increase participation rates: 325
"…if the trained personnel will not be careful when taking [the] sample, she/he can harm a child 326
and these children can inform each other that it hurts when they are taking [the] sample and this 327
will make all children not participate in [the] examination." (Lab technician) 328
In terms of feasibility, several IDI respondents said that a desire for samples to be processed at 329
the local level (in order to increase turn-around time) is likely unfeasible due to a lack of current 330
lab capacity at the district level. This was mentioned by both public health practitioners at the 331
national and lower levels of administration. 332
Blood spots 333
Key advantages to blood spots mentioned in a majority of FGDs were the familiarity with blood 334
testing and (particularly among FGDs with women) the lack of pain or adverse consequences 335
from the testing procedure. Half of FGDs (particularly those with men) indicated that the high 336
perceived accuracy of the results is an advantage to this method: 337
“There are many diseases that cannot be seen easily but when you take a blood sample to the lab 338
it will be a perfect solution.” (51–55-year-old man, TF1–9 <5% district) 339
Several FGDs mentioned that a disadvantage to blood spots is a lack of trust by participants that 340
the sample will be used only to test trachoma; with fears especially around testing for HIV or 341
other sexually transmitted infections without participants' consent. Many FGDs with participants 342
who mentioned this fear indicated that it could be mitigated with community education, as 343
community members had simply not been made aware that the presence of antibodies to 344
trachoma could be tested for via blood spots prior to participating in the FGDs. 345
. CC-BY 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted February 1, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.01.29.24301764doi: medRxiv preprint
17
One FGD among the Maasai ethnic group mentioned a general dislike of blood testing in 346
particular: 347
“We, as Maasai people don’t like blood testing most of the time. For example, HIV and TB are 348
prevalent in Maasai society and when people are asked to test using blood samples, they run 349
away.” (46–50-year-old woman, TF1–9 ≥ 5% district) 350
When IDI participants mentioned advantages of blood spots, community acceptability was not 351
often specifically mentioned as a key strength of this method. When community acceptability 352
was mentioned, the need for education was underscored. One IDI participant mentioned the 353
potential for distrust related to sample use (specifically related to fears around HIV testing) 354
among community members. Some IDI participants also mentioned the potential for community 355
acceptability issues if community participants expect on-the-spot results (as they would receive 356
for other types of blood tests they undergo as part of routine health care, such as malaria testing), 357
and again underscored the need for community education as to the purpose of the test in the 358
context of trachoma programming. 359
In terms of feasibility, key strengths mentioned by IDI participants included the familiarity of 360
blood spot collection and testing by health systems and the ability for high throughput of these 361
sample types, although several participants mentioned a lack of lab capacity to store and test 362
samples at a local level as a potential issue. While familiarity of blood testing by health systems 363
was often mentioned, IDI respondents did not mention the potential for integration of trachoma 364
monitoring into existing health systems via the use of blood spots as a specific advantage of this 365
method. 366
. CC-BY 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted February 1, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.01.29.24301764doi: medRxiv preprint
18
When asked, the majority of FGDs had at least one participant who would hypothetically 367
participate in each sample collection method. No qualitative difference in responses between 368
districts with a TF1–9 ≥ 5% vs. <5% was detected (15 FGDs in districts with a TF1–9 ≥ 5% vs. 15 369
FGDs in districts with a TF1–9 <5% with at least one respondent who said they would 370
hypothetically participate in each method). 371
FGDs with men generally indicated more willingness to hypothetically participate in all of the 372
testing methods compared to FGDs with women (16 FGDs with men vs. 14 FGDs with women 373
with at least one respondent who said they would hypothetically participate in each method). 374
While responses from FGDs with men and women were largely quite similar, FGDs with men 375
often mentioned the importance of perceived accuracy, a lack of adverse consequences from the 376
testing procedure, and the benefit of tests perceived as modern or high tech as important to 377
determining the acceptability of the different methods. FGDs with women mentioned the 378
importance of test familiarity and a lack of undue discomfort or harm from participating in the 379
test procedure as important to determining the acceptability of the different methods. 380
Quantitative survey of stakeholders 381
The online survey was live from April 24 to May 31, 2023. Responses from 98 people who 382
consented to participate were received. Respondents reported living and working in 42 different 383
countries and represented each trachoma-endemic WHO Region (African Region, Eastern 384
Mediterranean Region, Region of the Americas, South-East Asia Region, and the Western 385
Pacific Region). A majority (60%) of respondents were men. Most respondents were between the 386
ages of 35– 49 years, worked for an NGO, and worked in a programmatic/implementation role 387
(Table 1). 388
Table 1: Self-reported demographic information of respondents to stakeholder survey 389
. CC-BY 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted February 1, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.01.29.24301764doi: medRxiv preprint
19
Characteristic n %
Gender
Man 55 60%
Woman 37 40%
Age group
18–34 years 5 5%
35–49 years 45 48%
50–64 years 32 34%
65 + 11 12%
Organizational Role
Government 20 22%
Non-governmental organization 46 50%
University or research 22 24%
Other 4 4%
Personal Role
Academic/Research 24 26%
Programmatic/Implementation 57 61%
Other 12 13%
390
Eighty-one respondents answered questions beyond providing demographic information. Table 2 391
includes results for questions related to respondents' agreement with strengths and barriers to 392
each indicator. Almost all (79, 98%) of respondents agreed that TF grading being WHO-393
recommended for diagnosing trachoma is a strength of field grading of TF. Besides this, the 394
strengths of field grading of TF respondents most agreed with were that TF grading is familiar 395
(71, 88%), acceptable to communities (69, 85%), harmless/does not cause side effects (66, 81%), 396
and that participants are provided results on-the-spot (66, 81%). The most agreed-upon barrier 397
indicated for field grading of TF was that it is a subjective measure that is prone to human error 398
(65, 80%). 399
Table 2: Stakeholder Survey – Frequency of responses to strength/barrier survey items taken 400
from in-depth interview responses from public health practitioners in Tanzania 401
Survey ite m 3-w a
. CC-BY 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted February 1, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.01.29.24301764doi: medRxiv preprint
20
Total
respon-
dents
Strongly
agree or
agree
n (%)
Field grading of TF
Strength
TF grading is recommended by the World Health Organization for diagnosing
trachoma in communities. 81 79 (98 )
TF grading is a familiar method. 81 71 (88 )
TF grading is acceptable to communities. 81 69 (85 )
TF grading is harmless/does not cause side effects. 81 66 (81 )
TF grading provides results on the spot. 81 66 (81 )
TF grading is accurate. 79 42 (53 )
Barr
ier
TF grading is subjective and prone to human error. 81 65 (80 )
TF grading is not as sensitive or specific as other methods. 81 50 (62 )
Everting the eyes of children can be difficult. 80 49 (61 )
Conjunctival p hotography
Strength
Multiple graders can grade the same photo, which will increase accuracy and help
determine the status of "edge cases." 73 61 (84 )
Increased costs of conjunctival photography will be less than those for eye swabs or
blood spots. 73 41 (56
)
The potential to use Artificial Intelligence to grade photos will provide more accurate
Results
than field grading of TF. 71 34 (48
)
The photo can be used to determine the presence or absence of other eye diseases. 73 30 (41 )
Conjunctival photography is easy to implement. 72 29 (40 )
Grading the photo away from the field will reduce field time compared to TF grading. 73 24 (33 )
Conjunctival photography is more accurate than field grading of TF. 73 21 (29 )
Conjunctival photography is more sensitive than field grading of TF. 72 18 (25 )
Barr
ier
Increased costs compared to TF grading due to need for camera equipment. 72 43 (60
)
Increased costs compared to TF grading due to increased personnel training/time
needed. 72 41 (57 )
Community participation may be low if participants do not receive individual results. 71 39 (55 )
Community participation may be low due to fear/mistrust of having photo taken. 72 38 (53 )
Conjunctival photography grading is subjective and prone to human error. 72 36 (50 )
Community participation may be low due to fear of side effects due to photo flash. 72 27 (38 )
Conjunctival photography is perceived as less accurate compared to other methods. 73 18 (25 )
Infection testing
Strength
Infection testing can detect pre-symptomatic trachoma. 68 55 (81 )
Eye swabs can be tested for multiple pathogens/diseases. 70 55 (79 )
Infection testing is more accurate than field grading of TF at identifying trachoma. 70 54 (77 )
Infection testing is more accurate than other methods at identifying trachoma. 70 52 (74 )
Eye swabs/infection testing are acceptable to communities as long as education is
provided. 69 51 (74 )
Eye swabs have a low chance of causing side effects. 70 51 (73 )
. CC-BY 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted February 1, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.01.29.24301764doi: medRxiv preprint
21
Barr
ier
Extra work needed to plan for logistics of field collection and sample processing. 71 68 (96
)
Desire for samples to be tested by nearest lab may be a challenge. 71 63 (89 )
Increased costs compared to TF field grading due to storage of samples. 71 62 (87 )
Increased costs compared to TF field grading due to equipment needed. 71 62 (87 )
Requirement for cold chain a challenge due to need for stable electricity. 70 61 (87 )
Increased costs compared to TF field grading due to increased personnel
training/time needed. 70 48 (69 )
Poorly trained personnel might cause damage to eyes of participants. 71 40 (56 )
Community participation may be low if participants do not receive individual results. 70 36 (51 )
Community participation may be low due to fear of sample collection process or side
effects. 70 34 (49
)
Infection testing may be less accurate than TF field grading due to time between
collection and testing. 71 18 (25 )
Serology
Strength
Blood spots (for other diseases) are familiar to health systems. 66 51 (77 )
Blood spots are easy to collect. 66 47 (71 )
Blood spots are easier to transport and store than eye swabs. 64 42 (66 )
Blood spots (for other diseases) are familiar and acceptable to community members. 66 39 (59 )
Serological testing is more accurate than TF grading at identifying trachoma. 66 29 (44 )
Serological testing is fast. 65 26 (40 )
Serological testing can detect pre-symptomatic trachoma. 66 21 (32 )
B
arr
ier
Extra work needed to plan for logistics of field collection and sample processing. 66 58 (88
)
Increased costs compared to TF field grading due to equipment needed. 66 55 (83 )
Lack of current lab capacity. 65 52 (80 )
Increased costs compared to TF field grading due to increased personnel
training/time needed. 66 45 (68 )
Increased costs due to storage of samples. 65 41 (63 )
Increased danger of working with blood/risk of medical errors, compared to other
diagnostics. 66 38 (58
)
Field conditions challenging, samples may be destroyed in the field. 66 35 (53 )
Community participation may be low due to misunderstanding or mistrust of test
purpose. 66 35 (53
)
Community participation may be low if participants do not receive individual results. 64 31 (48 )
Community participation may be low due to fear of finger pricking. 66 28 (42 )
TF = trachomatous inflammation—follicular 402
The most agreed-upon strength for conjunctival photography was that multiple graders can grade 403
the same photo, increasing accuracy and helping to determine the status of borderline cases (61, 404
84%). In contrast, a third of respondents (24, 33%) said that a strength of conjunctival 405
photography is that the ability to grade the photo away from the field would reduce field time. 406
. CC-BY 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted February 1, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.01.29.24301764doi: medRxiv preprint
22
The most agreed-upon barrier to implementation of conjunctival photography is that it would 407
increase the costs compared to TF field grading due to the need for camera equipment (43, 60%), 408
followed closely by increased costs due to the need for increased personnel training and time (41, 409
57%). 410
For infection testing, the most agreed-upon strength was this indicator's ability to detect infection 411
in the absence of clinical signs (55, 81%). The most agreed-upon barriers for this indicator all 412
pertain to challenges around the feasibility of implementation, including the extra work required 413
to plan for logistics of field collection and sample processing (68, 96%), the challenge posed by a 414
desire for samples to be tested by the nearest lab (63, 89%), increased costs compared to field 415
grading of TF posed by the need to store samples (62, 87%) and purchase needed equipment (62, 416
87%), as well as the challenge posed by the requirement for maintaining a cold chain (61, 87%). 417
In contrast to items about feasibility, there were lower levels of agreement with barriers related 418
to low community participation, due either to a lack of receiving individual results (36, 51%), or 419
fear of the sample collection process or side effects (34, 49%). 420
The most agreed-with strengths of serology include the familiarity of health systems with blood 421
spots (for other diseases) (51, 77%), as well as an acknowledgement that blood spots are both 422
easy to collect (47, 71%), and easier to transport and store compared to eye swabs (42, 66%). 423
The most agreed-with barriers to the implementation of serology included the extra work needed 424
to plan for the logistics of field collection and sample processing (58, 88%), the increased costs 425
compared to TF field grading due to equipment needed (55, 83%), and the lack of current lab 426
capacity (52, 80%). Less than half of respondents agreed that community participation may be 427
low if participants do not receive individual test results (31, 48%) or due to a fear of finger 428
pricking (28, 42%). 429
. CC-BY 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted February 1, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.01.29.24301764doi: medRxiv preprint
23
The results of the comparison of responses to barriers related to community acceptability by 430
country staff vs. other stakeholders are presented in Table 3. (In this analysis, a higher score 431
indicates a stronger level of agreement that the statement is a barrier to implementation of the 432
indicator.) Country staff had a higher agreement compared to other stakeholders that barriers 433
around community acceptability of conjunctival photography would pose a challenge to 434
implementation of this indicator, while other stakeholders had higher agreement that barriers 435
related to community acceptability of serology would pose a challenge to implementation of this 436
indicator. However, none of the comparisons were significant at an alpha of 0.05. 437
Table 3: Stakeholder agreement with proposed barriers of complementary indicators to 438
trachomatous inflammation—follicular detection by affiliation (country staff vs. other 439
stakeholders) 440
Barrier
Country staff a
(n=14)
Other
stakeholders
(n=59) b
median (IQR)
median
(IQR) p value c
Conjunctival p hotography
Community participation may be low due to fear/mistrust of
having photo taken. 4.0 (3.6–4.4) 3.0 (2.0–4.0) 0.13
Community participation may be low due to fear of side effects
due to photo flash. 3.5 (2.5–4.5) 3.0 (2.0–4.0) 0.46
Community participation may be low if participants do not
receive individual results. 4.0 (3.5–4.5) 4.0 (3.5–4.5) 0.37
Infection testing
Community participation may be low due to fear of sample
collection process or side effects. 3.0 (2.0–4.0) 3.5 (2.5–4.5) 0.70
Community participation may be low if participants do not
receive individual results. 4.0 (3.4–4.6) 3.5 (3.0–4.0) 0.67
Serology
Community participation may be low due to fear of finger
pricking. 2.0 (1.1–2.9) 3.0 (2.0–4.0) 0.08
Community participation may be low due to misunderstanding
or mistrust of test purpose. 3.0 (2.1–3.9) 4.0 (3.5–4.5) 0.38
. CC-BY 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted February 1, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.01.29.24301764doi: medRxiv preprint
24
Community participation may be low if participants do not
receive individual results. 2.5 (1.6–3.4) 4.0 (3.0–5.0) 0.14
IQR = Interquartile range, a: organizational role = "Government" and personal role =
"Programmatic/Implementation", b: not all respondents answered every question, c: as measured by a 2-
tailed Wilcoxon-rank-sum test.
Note: A higher score indicates a stronger level of agreement that the statement is a barrier to
implementation of the indicator.
441
Key knowledge gaps entered by respondents are presented as Supplemental File 5. Categories of 442
knowledge gaps identified include: setting and interpreting meaningful thresholds using 443
complementary indicators, understanding test characteristics (e.g. sensitivity and specificity) of 444
each indicator, refining survey design to allow the inclusion of complementary indicators, 445
interpreting serological data, understanding clinical signs and the progression of disease, 446
integrating complementary indicators for trachoma into existing systems, understanding the 447
acceptability and feasibility of complementary indicators, and identifying and mitigating 448
potential issues with training and lab quality assurance. 449
Discussion
450
From the FGDs, we found that each diagnostic method explored was generally acceptable 451
to community members in Tanzania, with key themes such as not wanting to suffer harm from 452
the diagnostic process and the importance of (perceived) test accuracy apparent. From the IDIs 453
with public health practitioners in Tanzania, we found that these health workers also considered 454
each diagnostic method to be acceptable to community members, as long as appropriate 455
education on the risks and benefits of participation is provided. 456
When global stakeholders were asked to indicate their agreement that given barriers 457
would hinder implementation of complementary indicators, the highest agreement items tended 458
to be those around feasibility, rather than acceptability. The highest consensus of any strength or 459
barrier listed was agreement that the WHO recommendation for field grading of TF is a benefit 460
. CC-BY 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted February 1, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.01.29.24301764doi: medRxiv preprint
25
of this method, with 98% of respondents in agreement. When results around community 461
acceptability were stratified based on country staff vs. other stakeholder, no statistically 462
significant differences were found, indicating broad agreement among respondents in the 463
stakeholder survey that community acceptability of each method is unlikely to hinder 464
implementation. This was concordant with the findings from community members in Tanzania, 465
who rated each test type generally acceptable. 466
A study in the Bijagós Islands, Guinea Bissau on different diagnostic tests and sample 467
types for trachoma surveillance (including clinical exams, eye swabs, and finger-prick blood 468
samples) reported that although all the studied test types were generally acceptable, there was a 469
preference among community members for laboratory-based testing; these results were 470
considered more accurate than clinical examination.26 Additionally, sample types that did not 471
require close proximity to the eye (i.e., finger-prick blood samples) were preferred.26 Our study 472
had similar results, with participants noting a perception of improved accuracy from laboratory-473
based methods, although expressing some unease with the eye swab and blood spot procedures, 474
especially with regards to children. This similarity in findings is reassuring given the different 475
locations and population types, indicating some generalizability of the results. Considered in 476
parallel, these results suggest that acceptability would not be a widespread barrier to 477
implementation. 478
Different studies have shown varying levels of acceptability of blood collection. Research 479
in sub-Saharan Africa has shown that collecting blood or other bodily samples from individuals 480
can be challenging, with fears related to blood-stealing and intentional spreading of disease 481
concerning public health interventions documented since colonial times.27 Individual reticence to 482
participation in a trial in The Gambia involving blood collection via finger stick for malaria 483
. CC-BY 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted February 1, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.01.29.24301764doi: medRxiv preprint
26
screening was linked to fear of blood-taking due to depletion of life force and fear of 484
exploitation.28 In contrast, a study on the feasibility of bloodspot collection for the surveillance 485
of human African trypanosomiasis in the Democratic Republic of the Congo found that refusal to 486
participate in bloodspot collection was rare, although reasons for non-participation were not 487
analysed.29 Finger-prick blood samples are routinely taken for malaria testing,30 which is 488
commonplace in most places that are also trachoma-endemic.31 Our community member 489
participants expressed broad acceptance of blood spots, with two notable exceptions. 490
First, among the Maasai ethnic group one FGD (out of four) noted a general cultural 491
dislike of blood-giving. This may be related to a noted lack of trust of non-Maasai visitors, an 492
incomplete understanding of the purpose of interventions, and a perception of misalignment 493
between community and government priorities, which has eroded trust in this institution.32 A 494
study conducted in the Sinya Ward (a Maasai community in Longido District) found that, while 495
this community does perceive trachoma as a problem,33 competing priorities can make it difficult 496
to participate in trachoma-related interventions, such as MDA.32 A lack of sensitization around 497
MDA has previously been associated with poor uptake of azithromycin in this area,34 498
underscoring the need for effective messaging on health programs in these and other under-499
served communities, which, as we near trachoma elimination, may represent the last foci of TF. 500
Second, concerns explicitly about the purpose of blood tests were raised (among a variety 501
of ethnic groups), with specific fears mentioned around testing for HIV without the participants' 502
consent. These fears were relayed both by community participants themselves and recognized as 503
a potential reason for low community acceptance by public health practitioners. In this regard, 504
the familiarity and commonplace nature of blood testing is a disadvantage, as community 505
members are aware that their blood samples could be tested for many other diseases, some of 506
. CC-BY 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted February 1, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.01.29.24301764doi: medRxiv preprint
27
which (such as HIV) still carry a level of stigma.35 However, familiarity with blood spots was 507
also perceived as an advantage of this method, both by community members, who appreciated 508
the lack of pain or harm caused by the sample procedure, and by public health practitioners, who 509
noted experience with sample collection, processing, and testing by an array of health systems in 510
Tanzania. 511
While public health practitioners in Tanzania did often recognize the familiarity of blood 512
testing (for other diseases) by health systems as an advantage of this method, our study found a 513
lack of acknowledgement of the potential utility of serology for the integration of trachoma 514
monitoring with other disease programs. This group also recognized that a lack of local lab 515
capacity would make the quick processing of blood samples a challenge, which was corroborated 516
as a barrier to implementation by global stakeholders. The Global NTD road map 2021– 2030 517
calls for concerted action to achieve integration across NTD programs and for increased 518
investment in developing lab capacity in order to meet NTD targets.19 The long-term benefit of 519
investments in increasing and maintaining lab capacity of health systems for infection testing and 520
serology should be underscored to stakeholders at all levels. A coordinated approach is needed to 521
leverage the investments and achievements made to date across different disease programs, 522
enabling the building, strengthening and maintenance of laboratory capacity and networks.36 523
Community members found conjunctival photography to be an acceptable method for 524
trachoma diagnosis, noting a general familiarity with the concept of medical imaging and 525
potential benefits of this method compared to field grading of TF. Another study on the 526
acceptability of conjunctival photography among community members in Tanzania found similar 527
sentiment around the utility of photography for grading borderline cases (contributing to greater 528
overall accuracy), but noted an element of concern among community members regarding the 529
. CC-BY 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted February 1, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.01.29.24301764doi: medRxiv preprint
28
exposure of children to a photo flash.37 However, this fear pertained only to traditional digital 530
single-lens reflex (DSLR) cameras, compared to photography via smartphone.37 In addition, our 531
study did not find that issues around photo use and confidentiality were a concern among 532
community members. However, these issues were recognized as potential concerns by public 533
health practitioners in our study, as well as both community members and Tropical Data trainers 534
in the previous Tanzanian qualitative study.37 Consent materials for activities incorporating 535
conjunctival photography for research or programmatic use should be very clear as to the risks 536
and benefits of participating. 537
We found that generally, FGDs with men were more favorable to each of the test types 538
compared to FGDs with women, with FGDs with men more likely to have at least one 539
participant indicate that they would hypothetically allow the children under their care to 540
participate in each test type compared to FGDs with women. A previous systematic review and 541
meta-analysis on the acceptance of the COVID-19 vaccine, which included studies from each 542
WHO region, found that male gender was associated with an increased likelihood of vaccine 543
acceptance.38 A systematic review on this topic in sub-Saharan Africa found similar results.39 In 544
terms of care-giving behavior, a multi-country questionnaire similarly found that fathers are 545
more willing than mothers to vaccinate their children against COVID-19, possibly due to 546
differences in risk-taking behaviors among fathers vs. mothers.40 It may be advisable to target 547
messaging around the safety of and risk of discomfort or adverse consequences from each 548
diagnostic method specifically to women caregivers, especially as they are often the decision-549
makers in regards to children’s healthcare.41 550
The high level of stakeholder agreement that a WHO recommendation of field grading of 551
TF is beneficial indicates that additional WHO guidance around complementary indicators may 552
. CC-BY 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted February 1, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.01.29.24301764doi: medRxiv preprint
29
be advantageous. In informal workshops, tests for infection and serology have already been 553
advocated for by WHO,15 and the forthcoming guidelines on their use are eagerly awaited. 554
Seventy unique questions regarding knowledge gaps preventing the interpretation and 555
implementation of complementary indicators were identified by global stakeholders. The 556
collation and categorization of these questions will hopefully serve as a useful resource for 557
helping to define future research priorities as we approach the trachoma elimination endgame. 558
Our study had several limitations. Messaging that not all tests would yield individual 559
Results
was included in the FGD topic guide and stated by the research assistant while conducting 560
the FGD. However, it is clear from the transcripts that participants did not adequately understand 561
that they would not always receive individual results for each sample type, making conclusions 562
difficult to apply to surveillance settings, where participants could not expect individual results 563
and/or treatment. Furthermore, we note that asking community members if they would 564
hypothetically participate in each sample collection type may yield different results than actually 565
presenting participants with the opportunity to be tested. In addition, community FGDs and IDIs 566
only took place in a selection of sites within one country. There are likely to be differing views 567
across the trachoma-endemic world. 568
In attempting to evaluate the opinion of a variety of trachoma stakeholders, the 569
stakeholder survey was disseminated to as wide an audience as possible, resulting in an 570
opportunistic sample. While an opportunistic sample has implications for generalizability, the 571
multiple avenues of survey dissemination, the offering of multiple languages of the survey, and 572
the diverse geographic representation of respondents indicate that the results are likely fairly 573
representative of trachoma stakeholders as a whole. 574
. CC-BY 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted February 1, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.01.29.24301764doi: medRxiv preprint
30
Strengths and barriers from the IDIs were used to formulate the questions for the 575
stakeholder survey. In order to preserve the intent of these responses, the items in the stakeholder 576
survey could have been perceived as overly positive (for the strengths) and negative (for the 577
barriers), which may have had an effect in biasing stakeholders' level of agreement with each 578
item. In addition, the factual accuracy of the statements offered by the IDIs (for example, that 579
one test may be more "accurate" than another) is debatable, which may have hindered 580
interpretation of participants' agreement with these items. There may have also been potential 581
strengths and barriers to each method not identified by IDI respondents (such as the potential 582
benefit of being able to test blood spots for multiple infections). In each case, to avoid biasing 583
the selection of strengths and barriers presented in the questionnaire, care was taken to preserve 584
the original content and meaning from the IDIs. However, future surveys may wish to provide 585
more comprehensive lists of strengths and barriers and more neutral question wording (for 586
example, by allowing respondents to rate the acceptability of different methods, rather than their 587
agreement with subjective statements). 588
Future work would be needed in order to study the opinions of communities in other 589
regions to have more confidence in the generalizability of our results. A deeper exploration into 590
the attitudes and perceptions of blood testing among the Maasai ethnic group, along with the 591
effectiveness of potential education or sensitization strategies, is warranted in order to ensure this 592
group is equitably represented in future trachoma programming. In addition, a study of non-593
response rates in studies where additional indicators are collected would yield information about 594
the acceptability of different sample collection methods for trachoma detection during real-world 595
program activities. 596
Conclusions
597
. CC-BY 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted February 1, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.01.29.24301764doi: medRxiv preprint
31
We found that conjunctival photography, infection testing, and serology were all 598
generally acceptable to community members in Tanzania. Critical themes included participants 599
not wanting to suffer harm from the diagnostic process and the importance of (perceived) test 600
accuracy. Many of the perceived disadvantages mentioned by community members in Tanzania, 601
such as fear of undue discomfort or adverse consequences of participating in the diagnostic 602
process or mistrust of the test purpose (for serology) are potential focus areas for outreach by 603
healthcare workers and other partners prior to implementation. This need for community 604
education on the risks and benefits of participation of each of the methods was underscored in 605
interviews with public health practitioners in Tanzania. According to both Tanzanian public 606
health practitioners and global stakeholders, questions of feasibility remain, especially for 607
infection testing and serology. The fact that in general, all methods were acceptable to 608
community members is positive, as it may be that each indicator has a role to play for trachoma 609
elimination surveillance purposes. 610
611
. CC-BY 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted February 1, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.01.29.24301764doi: medRxiv preprint
32
Funding 612
Study activities were funded by the International Trachoma Initiative. AWS is a staff member of 613
the World Health Organization. RBs salary was funded by the Wellcome Trust (206275/Z/17/Z). 614
Competing Interests 615
I have read the journal's policy and the authors of this manuscript have the following competing 616
interests: KKR, PJH, and PME are employees of the International Trachoma Initiative (ITI), a 617
program of The Task Force for Global Health, which receives an operating budget and research 618
funds from Pfizer Inc., the manufacturers of Zithromax (azithromycin). EMHE receives salary 619
support from ITI, and PM and JMM were contractors of ITI for the duration of field activities in 620
Tanzania. Pfizer, Inc. had no role in in the study conception or design; data collection, analysis, 621
or interpretation; writing of the report; or the decision to publish this work. 622
Authors' Contributions 623
KKR, EMHE, and AWS conceived of the study; KKR, RB, TDH, GK, TBM, and EMHE 624
designed the study protocols; PME and PJH reviewed the Tanzania study protocol; GK, JMM, 625
PM, SGM, and KKR carried out field coordination; KKR, JMM, and PM carried out data 626
collection; KKR conducted data analysis; KKR, TBM, JMM, PM, and EMHE conducted data 627
interpretation; KKR prepared the original draft of the manuscript; all authors critically reviewed 628
the manuscript and approved the final manuscript for publication. 629
Acknowledgements
630
The authors which to thank the participants of the focus group discussions, in-depth interviews, 631
and the survey respondents for their involvement in this project. 632
Data availability statement 633
Study data will be made available upon reasonable request to the corresponding author. 634
. CC-BY 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted February 1, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.01.29.24301764doi: medRxiv preprint
33
Disclaimer 635
The authors alone are responsible for the views expressed in this article and they do not 636
necessarily represent the views, decisions or policies of the institutions with which they are 637
affiliated. 638
639
. CC-BY 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted February 1, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.01.29.24301764doi: medRxiv preprint
34
References
640
1. Gambhir M, Grassly NC, Burton MJ, Solomon AW, Taylor HR, Mabey DC, et al. Estimating the 641
Future Impact of a Multi-Pronged Intervention Strategy on Ocular Disease Sequelae Caused by 642
Trachoma: A Modeling Study. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2015;22(6):394-402. 643
2. World Health Organization. Validation of elimination of trachoma as a public health problem. 644
Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2016. 645
3. World Health Organization. Report of the third Global Scientific Meeting on Trachoma 646
Elimination. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University; 2010. 647
4. Wright HR, Taylor HR. Clinical examination and laboratory tests for estimation of trachoma 648
prevalence in a remote setting: what are they really telling us? Lancet Infect Dis. 2005;5(5):313-20. 649
5. Ramadhani AM, Derrick T, Macleod D, Holland MJ, Burton MJ. The Relationship between Active 650
Trachoma and Ocular Chlamydia trachomatis Infection before and after Mass Antibiotic Treatment. PLoS 651
Negl Trop Dis. 2016;10(10):e0005080. 652
6. Solomon AW, Harding-Esch E, Alexander ND, Aguirre A, Holland MJ, Bailey RL, et al. Two doses 653
of azithromycin to eliminate trachoma in a Tanzanian community. N Engl J Med. 2008;358(17):1870-1. 654
7. Butcher R, Sokana O, Jack K, Sui L, Russell C, Last A, et al. Clinical signs of trachoma are prevalent 655
among Solomon Islanders who have no persistent markers of prior infection with Chlamydia 656
trachomatis. Wellcome Open Res. 2018;3:14. 657
8. Trotignon G, Jones E, Engels T, Schmidt E, McFarland DA, Macleod CK, et al. The cost of mapping 658
trachoma: Data from the Global Trachoma Mapping Project. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2017;11(10):e0006023-659
e. 660
9. Harding-Esch EM, Burgert-Brucker CR, Jimenez C, Bakhtiari A, Willis R, Bejiga MD, et al. Tropical 661
Data: Approach and Methodology as Applied to Trachoma Prevalence Surveys. Ophthalmic 662
Epidemiology. 2023;30(6):544-60. 663
10. Jimenez C, Gower E, Harding-Esch E, West SK. Harnessing photography and image recognition 664
technology to aid in the elimination of trachoma. Community Eye Health. 2022;35(114):24. 665
11. Solomon AW, Pavluck AL, Courtright P, Aboe A, Adamu L, Alemayehu W, et al. The Global 666
Trachoma Mapping Project: Methodology of a 34-Country Population-Based Study. Ophthalmic 667
Epidemiology. 2015;22(3):214-25. 668
12. Harding-Esch EM, Naufal F, Saboya M, Jimenez C, West SK. Use of photography for support of 669
trachoma grading: progress report. 2021. 670
13. Martin DL, Saboyà-Díaz MI, Abashawl A, Alemayeh W, Gwyn S, Hooper PJ, et al. The use of 671
serology for trachoma surveillance: Current status and priorities for future investigation. PLoS Negl Trop 672
Dis. 2020;14(9):e0008316-e. 673
14. World Health Organization. Trachoma Alternative Indicators Study Data review. Geneva, 674
Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2016. 675
15. World Health Organization. Informal consultation on end-game challenges for trachoma 676
elimination. Task Force for Global Health, Decatur, United States of America. Geneva: World Health 677
Organization; 2022. 7–9 December 2021. 678
16. World Health Organization. WHO handbook for guideline development - 2nd ed. Geneva, 679
Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2014. 680
17. Senyonjo L, Downs P, Schmidt E, Bailey R, Blanchet K. Lessons learned for surveillance strategies 681
for trachoma elimination as a public health problem, from the evaluation of approaches utilised by 682
Guinea worm and onchocerciasis programmes: A literature review. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 683
2021;15(1):e0009082-e. 684
18. Oldenburg CE, Aragie S, Amza A, Solomon AW, Brogdon J, Arnold BF, et al. Can we eradicate 685
trachoma? A survey of stakeholders. Br J Ophthalmol. 2021;105(8):1059-62. 686
. CC-BY 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted February 1, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.01.29.24301764doi: medRxiv preprint
35
19. World Health Organization. Ending the neglect to attain the Sustainable Development Goals – A 687
road map for neglected tropical diseases 2021–2030. Geneva , Switzerland World Health Organization; 688
2020. 689
20. International Trachoma Initiative. Global Atlas of Trachoma Decatur, Georgia 2020 [Available 690
from: trachomaatlas.org]. 691
21. Magnani R, Sabin, Keith, Saidel, Tobi, Heckathorn, Douglas. Review of sampling hard-to-reach 692
and hidden populations for HIV surveillance. AIDS. 2005;19:S67-S72. 693
22. Lumivero. NVivo 13 (2020, R1). 694
23. Gale NK, Heath G, Cameron E, Rashid S, Redwood S. Using the framework method for the 695
analysis of qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health research. BMC Medical Research Methodology. 696
2013;13(1):117. 697
24. SurveyMonkey Inc. San Mateo, California, USA [Available from: www.surveymonkey.com ]. 698
25. R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R 699
Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2021. 700
26. Sahota RS, Sanha S, Last A, Cassama E, Goncalves A, Kelly AH, et al. Acceptability and perceived 701
utility of different diagnostic tests and sample types for trachoma surveillance in the Bijagos Islands, 702
Guinea Bissau. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2021;115(8):847-53. 703
27. Geissler PW, Pool R. Editorial: Popular concerns about medical research projects in sub-Saharan 704
Africa – a critical voice in debates about medical research ethics. Tropical Medicine & International 705
Health. 2006;11(7):975-82. 706
28. O'Neill S, Dierickx S, Okebe J, Dabira E, Gryseels C, d'Alessandro U, et al. The Importance of 707
Blood Is Infinite: Conceptions of Blood as Life Force, Rumours and Fear of Trial Participation in a Fulani 708
Village in Rural Gambia. PLoS One. 2016;11(8):e0160464. 709
29. Inocencio da Luz R, Phanzu DM, Kiabanzawoko ON, Miaka E, Verlé P, De Weggheleire A, et al. 710
Feasibility of a dried blood spot strategy for serological screening and surveillance to monitor 711
elimination of Human African Trypanosomiasis in the Democratic Republic of the Congo. PLoS Negl Trop 712
Dis. 2021;15(6):e0009407. 713
30. World Health Organization. Malaria surveillance, monitoring and evaluation: a reference 714
manual. Geneva, Switzerland World Health Organization; 2018. 715
31. World Health Organization. World malaria report 2022. Geneva; 2022. 716
32. Mtuy TB, Bardosh K, Ngondi J, Mwingira U, Seeley J, Burton M, et al. Understanding hard-to-717
reach communities: local perspectives and experiences of trachoma control among the pastoralist 718
Maasai in northern Tanzania. J Biosoc Sci. 2021;53(6):819-38. 719
33. Mtuy TB, Burton MJ, Mwingira U, Ngondi JM, Seeley J, Lees S. Knowledge, perceptions and 720
experiences of trachoma among Maasai in Tanzania: Implications for prevention and control. PLoS Negl 721
Trop Dis. 2019;13(6):e0007508-e. 722
34. Desmond N, Solomon AW, Massae PA, Lema N, Anemona A, Foster A, et al. Acceptability of 723
azithromycin for the control of trachoma in Northern Tanzania. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 724
2005;99(9):656-63. 725
35. Gooden TE, Mkhoi ML, Mdoe M, Mwalukunga LJ, Senkoro E, Kibusi SM, et al. Barriers and 726
facilitators of people living with HIV receiving optimal care for hypertension and diabetes in Tanzania: a 727
qualitative study with healthcare professionals and people living with HIV. BMC Public Health. 728
2023;23(1):2235. 729
36. Mfuh KO, Abanda NN, Titanji BK. Strengthening diagnostic capacity in Africa as a key pillar of 730
public health and pandemic preparedness. PLOS Glob Public Health. 2023;3(6):e0001998. 731
37. Bisanzio D, Butcher R, Turbé V, Matsumoto K, Dinesh C, Massae P, et al. Accuracy, acceptability 732
and feasibility of photography for use in trachoma surveys: a mixed methods study in Tanzania. Int 733
Health. 2023. 734
. CC-BY 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted February 1, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.01.29.24301764doi: medRxiv preprint
36
38. Wang Q, Yang L, Jin H, Lin L. Vaccination against COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-735
analysis of acceptability and its predictors. Prev Med. 2021;150:106694. 736
39. Azanaw J, Endalew M, Zenbaba D, Abera E, Chattu VK. COVID-19 vaccine acceptance and 737
associated factors in 13 African countries: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Public Health. 738
2022;10:1001423. 739
40. Goldman RD, Yan TD, Seiler M, Parra Cotanda C, Brown JC, Klein EJ, et al. Caregiver willingness 740
to vaccinate their children against COVID-19: Cross sectional survey. Vaccine. 2020;38(48):7668-73. 741
41. McCauley AP, West S, Lynch M. Household decisions among the Gogo people of Tanzania: 742
determining the roles of men, women and the community in implementing a trachoma prevention 743
program. Soc Sci Med. 1992;34(7):817-24. 744
745
. CC-BY 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted February 1, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.01.29.24301764doi: medRxiv preprint
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
(via DOI)
is the canonical version.