Prevention of postlaparoscopic shoulder pain by forced evacuation of residual CO(2).

OA: gold
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View on PubMed
AI-generated summary by qwen3.7-flash, 2026-08-31

Forced evacuation of residual carbon dioxide via abdominal filling with warm saline effectively prevents postlaparoscopic shoulder pain in patients undergoing gynecologic laparoscopic surgery.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by qwen3.7-flash, 2026-08-22 · read from full text

This prospective, randomized study evaluated whether forcibly evacuating residual carbon dioxide from the abdomen using warm saline instillation reduces postlaparoscopic shoulder pain. The researchers enrolled 40 patients undergoing gynecologic laparoscopy, assigning them to either a control group receiving standard gas evacuation or an intervention group where the abdomen was filled with 1000–1500 mL of warm saline before port removal. Results indicated that patients in the intervention group experienced significantly lower visual analog scale scores for shoulder pain on the first postoperative day compared to the control group, with none reporting severe pain above the cutoff value. The authors concluded that this technique effectively prevents early postoperative symptoms without causing negative side effects, potentially enhancing patient satisfaction and recovery speed. Relevance to endometriosis: listed as one indication for GnRH antagonists, though the paper's main focus is uterine fibroids.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Background and objectivesShoulder pain is one of the early postlaparoscopic symptoms related to CO(2) used for pneumoperitoneum and remaining in the abdomen. The present study was conducted to validate the hypothesis that complete evacuation of the residual CO(2) would prevent postlaparoscopic shoulder pain.MethodsForty consecutive patients, the candidates for gynecologic laparoscopic surgery, were randomly enrolled into one of the following 2 groups. Nineteen patients entered Group I where the residual CO(2) was evacuated by abdominal oppression and served as the study control group. The remaining 21 patients entered Group II, where the residual CO(2) was evacuated by pumping warm saline into the abdomen until it spilled out of the open ports. Nurses, blind to the patient's grouping, recorded shoulder pain VAS scores twice daily.ResultsVAS scores in Group I started to increase at Day 1AM, reached a peak at Day 1PM, and decreased gradually thereafter. VAS scores in Group II stayed low throughout the investigation period. The difference was highly significant (P<0.001).ConclusionsAbdominal filling with saline at the end of laparoscopic surgery effectively evacuates residual CO(2) thus preventing postlaparoscopic shoulder pain.
Full text 11,022 characters · extracted from pmc-nxml · 4 sections · click to expand

Results

Table 1 denotes the basic characteristics of the 2 groups. None of the parameters incorporated here was able to differentiate the groups. Basic Characteristics * of the 2 Groups None of the parameters listed here were able to differentiate the groups. This implies that randomization worked effectively. Student t test (Welch). Chi-square test. Figure 1 demonstrates the time course of mean VAS scores in the 2 groups. Mean VAS scores in Group I increased to 1.05±0.37 (mean±SEM) points on Day 1 AM and reached the highest value of 1.79±0.46 at Day 1 PM. The elevated VAS scores decreased gradually thereafter. In contrast, VAS scores in Group II stayed low throughout the period of investigation. Differences between groups were highly statistically significant (P<0.001). Time courses of mean VAS scores in the 2 groups. VAS scores in Group I started to increase at Day 1AM, reached a peak at Day 1PM, and decreased gradually thereafter. Those in Group II stayed low throughout the investigation period. The means and standard errors of the mean (SEM) are shown. The between-group difference was highly significant by the discriminant analysis (P<0.001). As seen in Table 2 , the between-group difference became highlighted when the patients were categorized according to the individual VAS scores at Day 1PM. A cut-off value of 3-points was used for categorization. Eight of the 19 Group I patients had documented VAS scores above the cut-off value. One patient had the highest VAS score, 6 points. In addition, there were 5 and 2 patients with VAS scores of 4 and 3 points, respectively. Shoulder pain became worse when the patients were in an upright position, and, therefore, the majority of those with high VAS scores tended to lie in bed throughout the day. None of the Group II patients reported VAS scores above the cut-off value. Distribution of the Patients Categorized According to Individual VAS Scores at Day 1 PM * P = 0.00196. Eight of the 19 Group I patients documented the VAS scores above the cut-off value. One patient recorded the highest VAS score, 6 points. In addition, 5 and 2 patients had VAS scores of 4 and 3 points, respectively. None of the Group II patients reported VAS scores above the cut-off value.

Discussion

Laparoscopic surgery is now widely accepted as a form of minimally invasive surgery and has gradually been replacing conventional laparotomy. However, this does not imply that the surgery is free of unpleasant symptoms. One of the unpleasant postsurgical symptoms is shoulder pain. A considerable number of patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery experiences shoulder pain. Occasionally, shoulder pain is so strong that the patient needs analgesics and is forced to lie in bed for some time, albeit transiently. It is desirable to prevent or diminish this symptom. The Cochran Database 12 shows that postlaparoscopic shoulder pain is preventable by evacuating the residual CO 2 , but the way to prevent it, ie, through drainage, is not justifiable. It has been suggested that the residual CO 2 could be evacuated by instillation of 2 to 3 liters of Ringer's lactate into the abdomen at the end of the surgery and, by doing so, postoperative pain could be markedly diminished. 13 This is a very attractive hypothesis, but its scientific relevance has not been shown. We decided to evaluate and validate this hypothesis. As seen in Table 1 , no between-group difference was observed as far as the basic characteristics of the patients were concerned. This implies that randomization worked properly and effectively in the present study, and, therefore, patient bias was negligible. Another important aspect as to the credibility of the study is that VAS scores were assessed and recorded by nurses blinded to the patient's grouping who interviewed the patients on the scheduled occasions. We believe that by using this system highly reliable data were collected. What we have observed in the study is that the time course of shoulder pain after laparoscopic surgery was strikingly different between the groups (P<0.001). When laparoscopic surgery was ended with our previous routine procedures (Group I), shoulder pain VAS scores started to increase at Day 1AM of the surgery, formed a peak at Day 1PM, and decreased gradually thereafter. One of the patients in this group reported a VAS score as high as 6 points at Day 1PM. Because the pain became worse when she was in an upright position, she unwillingly stayed in bed for that whole day and the following day as well. Additionally, there are 5 more patients to be mentioned in this group. They had VAS scores as high as 4 points at Day 1PM and experienced some limitations in their daily activity. In contrast to this, when laparoscopic surgery was ended with abdominal filling with saline (Group II), shoulder pain VAS scores remained low throughout the investigation period. None of the patients in this group reported VAS scores greater than 3 points. As mentioned earlier, we hypothesized that abdominal filling with saline at the end of laparoscopic surgery might force the residual CO 2 to pass through the open ports and that the forced evacuation of the residual CO 2 might prevent postlaparoscopic shoulder pain. The hypothesis was indeed validated. Furthermore, this seems to have another good feature. Patients receiving abdominal filling voided a considerable amount of urine during the night of surgery. This implies that abdominal saline is transferred rather quickly through the peritoneum into the general circulation. It is quite likely, if this is the case, that the amount of intravenous infusion can be reduced. Then, the patient can move more freely and easily, without the lines connected. This might enhance patient satisfaction. We have now applied this abdominal filling to all of the laparoscopy patients as one of the new routine procedures. No patient has reported any negative effects from this procedure.

Introduction

Laparoscopic surgery provides great satisfaction to patients. High-grade visibility guarantees the completeness and safety of the surgery. 1 Limited damage to the abdominal muscular fascia minimizes postsurgical symptoms, and, therefore, increases the speed at which a patient can return to normal activity and minimizes the deterioration in patient's quality of life. Consequently, minimal invasiveness is achieved, which is one of the most important properties of laparoscopic surgery. The minimal invasiveness of laparoscopic surgery is enjoyed by the vast majority of patients, but not all. Some experience an unpleasant postsurgical symptom, ie, shoulder pain, seemingly specific to laparoscopic surgery. Occasionally, shoulder pain is so severe that patient's quality of life is markedly damaged, though transient. The genesis of shoulder pain is not clearly understood. Although it is generally regarded as a symptom related to CO 2 pneumoperitoneum, shoulder pain may occur in gasless laparoscopy. 2 It has been suggested that shoulder pain is reducible by creating pneumoperitoneum with warm, humid CO 2 , not with cold, dry CO 2 . 3 – 7 However, the controversy remains. Several reports 8 – 11 question the benefits of warm, humid CO 2 . What is interesting as to shoulder pain is that drainage after elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy reduces early postlaparoscopic pain, including shoulder pain, and, furthermore, that suction drainage is more effective than passive drainage in reducing pain. 12 This indicates that the residual CO 2 or air in the abdomen is the culprit of postlaparoscopic shoulder pain, and drainage can be an answer to the question of how to reduce or prevent this symptom. However, the story is not that simple. Routine use of drainage is not justifiable, because it increases wound infection rates and delays hospital discharge. 12 We developed a working hypothesis that complete evacuation of the residual CO 2 could enhance patient satisfaction by reducing unpleasant early postlaparoscopic symptoms. The method, we thought, for forcibly evacuating residual CO 2 is to open all the ports and fill the abdomen with warm saline at the end of laparoscopic surgery. By doing so, CO 2 in the abdomen, being lighter than saline, rises and escapes through the open ports. This idea is the result of a literature survey, where it has been suggested that abdominal gas is removable by instillation of 2 to 3 liters of Ringer's lactate and placement of a 5-mm blunt probe in the umbilical incision to purge the abdomen of gas. 13 This is a very attractive idea, but no scientific relevance is provided in the literature. We, therefore, decided to conduct a prospective, randomized, comparative study to validate this working hypothesis.

Materials|Methods

Our routine laparoscopic surgery procedures consist of the following: a subumbilical transverse incision (ca. 15-mm) and the first trocar placement (Visiport Plus, Tyco US Surgical, Norwalk, CT); pneumoperitoneum with warm CO 2 at the pressure of 8mm Hg; Trendelenburg position; placement of the second and third 5-mm trocars in the bilateral suprainguinal region; surgical performance; cessation of CO 2 insufflation; opening all the trocars; abdominal pressure by the surgeons' hands to evacuate the residual CO 2 ; horizontal position; removal of the trocars; closure of the wounds. a subumbilical transverse incision (ca. 15-mm) and the first trocar placement (Visiport Plus, Tyco US Surgical, Norwalk, CT); pneumoperitoneum with warm CO 2 at the pressure of 8mm Hg; Trendelenburg position; placement of the second and third 5-mm trocars in the bilateral suprainguinal region; surgical performance; cessation of CO 2 insufflation; opening all the trocars; abdominal pressure by the surgeons' hands to evacuate the residual CO 2 ; horizontal position; removal of the trocars; closure of the wounds. A total of 40 consecutive patients, being the candidates for gynecologic laparoscopic surgery at Takanohara Central Hospital, provided informed consent and were randomly enrolled in either one of the following 2 groups. They were not informed of their grouping. Of the 40, 19 patients entered Group I where our routine procedures were adopted as shown above and served as the control group. The remaining 21 patients entered Group II, where step 8 of our routine procedures was replaced by instillation of warm saline into the abdomen through one of the 2 suprainguinal ports until it spilled out of the remaining open trocars. The amount of saline pumped in ranged from 1000 mL to 1500 mL. After the surgery, shoulder pain was evaluated with the visual analog scale (VAS) twice daily (AM and PM) until Day 3 of the surgery. VAS scores were obtained through patient interviews by nurses who were blinded to the patient's grouping. Blood cell counts and serum CRP levels were measured on Day 1. The Student t test, chi-square test, and discriminant analysis were used for statistical analysis. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant. The Institutional Ethics Committee approved the study.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: pmc-nxml

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-08-30T09:23:35.175841+00:00