“Refereeing Template”: A Guide to Writing an Effective Peer Review

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-4.0
🔓 Open OA copy View at publisher
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-17

This guide presents a systematic "Refereeing Template" for peer reviewers, emphasizing evaluation of a manuscript's claims against supporting data before assessing publication suitability.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

We offer here a “Refereeing Template” to guide a more constructive and systematic peer review process. This template provides the following algorithm for constructing a peer review: (i) list the key claims of the manuscript; (ii) determine if the data (and interpretations of the data) support said claims; and, only as a last step, (iii) offer an opinion as to whether the supported claims deserve publication in the targeted journal. The Refereeing Template is designed to improve the quality and clarity of reviews by emphasizing claims, arguments backed by supporting evidence, as the basis for evaluating the quality of a manuscript, and translating that evaluation into an assessment of impact and significance.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-19T01:45:01.086888+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-28T02:00:01.590549+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0