Reassessing Equity Valuation: The Mathematical and Economic Superiority of the Potential Payback Period (PPP)
preprint
OA: closed
CC-BY-4.0
AI-generated summary
This paper mathematically and economically demonstrates the superiority of the Potential Payback Period (PPP) over conventional valuation tools, showing its ability to handle edge cases and unify equity and fixed-income metrics.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
The Potential Payback Period (PPP) offers a mathematically rigorous and economically interpretable alternative to conventional equity valuation tools such as the Price-to-Earnings (P/E) and PEG ratios. This article demonstrates, through multiple analytic methods, why PPP remains well-defined, stable, and conceptually superior under conditions where traditional models collapse. Using L’Hôpital’s Rule, Taylor expansions, direct limit analysis, and economic reasoning, we show that PPP is uniquely equipped to handle edge cases such as g = r, negative or near-zero earnings, and fast-growing firms with delayed profitability. The analysis culminates in positioning PPP not merely as a replacement for the P/E ratio, but as a unifying valuation metric across equity and fixed-income instruments.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-05-28T02:00:01.590549+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0