Time will tell: the temporal and demographic contexts of plant-soil microbe interactions

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-NC-4.0

Abstract

Soil microorganisms can have profound impacts on plant community dynamics and have received increasing attention in the context of plant-soil feedback. The effects of soil microbes on plant community dynamics are classically evaluated with a two-phase experimental design that consists of a conditioning phase, during which plants modify the soil microbial community, and a response phase, during which the biomass performance of plants is measured as their response to the soil modification. Predicting plant community-level outcomes based on these greenhouse experimental results implicitly assumes that plant-soil microbe interactions remain constant through time. However, a growing body of research points to a complex temporal trajectory of plant-soil microbe interactions, with microbial effects varying with the conditioning duration, plant development, and time since conditioning. Most previous studies also implicitly assume that measuring plant biomass performance alone adequately captures the most critical impacts soil microbes have on plant population dynamics, neglecting that soil microbes also govern other key demographic processes over the plant life cycle. Here, we discuss the relevance of these temporal and demographic dimensions of plant-soil microbe interactions when extrapolating experimental results and propose modeling frameworks that can incorporate the new empirical evidence. By integrating empirical and theoretical approaches, we provide a roadmap for more nuanced predictions of the long-term consequences of plant-soil microbe interactions in nature.
Full text 2,216 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 2 sections · click to expand

Abstract

Soil microorganisms can have profound impacts on plant community dynamics and have received increasing attention in the context of plant-soil feedback. The effects of soil microbes on plant community dynamics are classically evaluated with a two-phase experimental design that consists of a conditioning phase, during which plants modify the soil microbial community, and a response phase, during which the biomass performance of plants is measured as their response to the soil modification. Predicting plant community-level outcomes based on these greenhouse experimental results implicitly assumes that plant-soil microbe interactions remain constant through time. However, a growing body of research points to a complex temporal trajectory of plant-soil microbe interactions, with microbial effects varying with the conditioning duration, plant development, and time since conditioning. Most previous studies also implicitly assume that measuring plant biomass performance alone adequately captures the most critical impacts soil microbes have on plant population dynamics, neglecting that soil microbes also govern other key demographic processes over the plant life cycle. Here, we discuss the relevance of these temporal and demographic dimensions of plant-soil microbe interactions when extrapolating experimental results and propose modeling frameworks that can incorporate the new empirical evidence. By integrating empirical and theoretical approaches, we provide a roadmap for more nuanced predictions of the long-term consequences of plant-soil microbe interactions in nature. DOI https://doi.org/10.32942/X2PS5N Subjects Ecology and Evolutionary Biology

Keywords

conspecific negative density dependence, demographic models, Janzen-Connell hypothesis, microbial community, patch occupancy model, plant-soil feedback Dates Published: 2024-10-31 10:08 License CC-BY Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International Additional Metadata Conflict of interest statement: None Data and Code Availability Statement: https://github.com/pojuke/DemographicReviewPSF Language: English

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2024) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-28T02:00:01.590549+00:00
License: CC-BY-NC-4.0