Object Detection Performance: A Comparative Study

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-4.0
📄 Open PDF View at publisher

Abstract

Abstract Object detection is a critical task in computer vision with applications in many domains. Recent advances in deep learning have led to significant improvements in the performance of object detectors. This paper presents a comparative performance analysis of generic object detectors, with a focus on single-stage and two-stage detectors. The paper first discusses the taxonomy of object detection algorithms, and then presents a detailed performance comparison of single-stage and two-stage detectors. The performance of different detectors was evaluated on two different datasets, Microsoft COCO and PASCAL VOC 2012. The results showed that DetectoRS is a state-of-the-art two-stage object detector, outperforms all other two-stage models. While YOLOv4 and FCOS are the two most accurate single-stage detectors. The comparative results also show that single-stage detectors are generally less accurate than two-stage detectors, but they are typically faster. The paper also includes the strengths and weaknesses of different object detection approaches and identifies promising directions for future research.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-19T01:45:01.086888+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-28T02:00:01.590549+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0