A Neural Mass Modelling Framework for Evaluating EEG Source Localisation of Seizure Activity

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-NC-4.0
AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-03 · read from full text

The study developed a simulation framework that generates biologically plausible seizure (ictal) dynamics using network-coupled neural mass models (Epileptor) and then produces corresponding EEG signals via realistic head forward models with known ground truth. Using this benchmark dataset, the authors evaluated established EEG source localisation methods under both idealised and more realistic conditions, finding that spatial localisation accuracy was reasonable in high-density, noise-free settings but degraded markedly with reduced sensor coverage and added noise. The main driver of degradation was failure to recover source polarity, even when spatial localisation accuracy was comparatively preserved. This paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Full text 1,792 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract Electroencephalography and magnetoencephalography (EEG/MEG) provide non-invasive measurements of large-scale neural activity but do not directly reveal the underlying cortical sources, motivating the use of source localisation algorithms. However, objective evaluation of these methods remains challenging due to the absence of an experimentally verifiable ground truth. This study presents a simulation framework for generating biologically plausible ictal dynamics and their corresponding EEG signals to enable systematic benchmarking of source imaging approaches. Cortical seizure initiation and propagation were simulated using network-coupled neural mass (Epileptor) models, and combined with realistic forward models of the human head to produce macroscopic, electrophysiological data with known ground truth under varying conditions. Using this dataset, we evaluated established source localisation methods across idealised and realistic scenarios. Existing approaches achieved reasonable spatial accuracy under high-density, noise-free conditions; however, performance degraded substantially with reduced sensor coverage and added noise. This degradation was driven primarily by failures to recover source polarity, even when spatial localisation remained relatively accurate. These results suggest that current methods may be sufficient for identifying epileptogenic regions or tracking regional recruitment, but highlight polarity reconstruction as a key limitation for studies of seizure dynamics and network organisation. The proposed framework provides a reproducible and biologically grounded testbed for the development and evaluation of electrophysiological source localisation techniques. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-28T02:00:01.590549+00:00
License: CC-BY-NC-4.0