Multiverse Interpersonal Physiological Synchrony: quantifying the impact of parameters selection on Windowed Cross-Correlation results
preprint
OA: closed
CC-BY-4.0
AI-generated summary
A multiverse analysis of cardiac synchrony using Windowed Cross-Correlation revealed that parameter choices influenced task-specific synchrony discrimination, with stability measures proving most robust and the Peak-Picking algorithm overestimating synchrony.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
Interpersonal Physiological Synchrony (IPS), the alignment of physiological signals during social interactions requires advanced statistical methods to be quantified. Such methods rely on the application of researcher-defined parameters, which can significantly affect outcomes. Multiverse analysis, applying multiple analytical strategies to the same dataset, reveals how parameter choices influence results, thus mitigating possible bias and enhancing transparency and reliability of results. In this study, we used a multiverse approach to reanalyse - through Windowed Cross-Correlation (WCC) - a dyadic ECG dataset from participants involved in a Joint Action task as well as simulated data generated via Kuramoto models (mathematical models used in describing synchronyzation) . We explored how the combination of i) window size, ii) window overlap, iii) prewhitening and iv) use of Peak-Picking (PP) algorithm affected several indices of IPS strength and stability, as well as their ability to discriminate between real and surrogate dyads. The original results of the stufy were overall replicated, with all IPS indices successfully discriminating genuine from surrogate synchrony regardless of parameter selection. By contrast, the selection of parameters had a greater influence when distinguishing between task and baseline IPS. Moreover, the PP algorithm tended to overestimate synchrony strength, thereby hindering discrimination. Importantly, measures of synchrony stability proved effective in distinguishing genuine from surrogate synchrony. Based on our multiverse results, we provide recommendations for researchers applying WCC analysis to study cardiac IPS synchrony.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-05-28T02:00:01.590549+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0