Gen AI for API Generation in Portfolio Optimization

Gen AI for API Generation in Portfolio Optimization | Research Square window.SnipcartSettings = { analytics: { enabled: false } }; (function() { var accessVector = localStorage.getItem('access_vector') || ''; window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; if (accessVector) { window.dataLayer.push({ user: { profile: { profileInfo: { snid: accessVector } } } }); } })(); (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src='https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-K279D39R'); Browse Preprints In Review Journals COVID-19 Preprints AJE Video Bytes Research Tools Research Promotion AJE Professional Editing AJE Rubriq About Preprint Platform In Review Editorial Policies Our Team Advisory Board Help Center Sign In Submit a Preprint Cite Share Download PDF Short Report Gen AI for API Generation in Portfolio Optimization Latha Ramamoorthy, Merlin Balamurugan This is a preprint; it has not been peer reviewed by a journal. https://doi.org/ 10.21203/rs.3.rs-6507484/v1 This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License Status: Under Review Version 1 posted 12 You are reading this latest preprint version Abstract Portfolio optimization is pivotal in helping investors balance risk and achieve their financial goals. Traditional development methods rely heavily on manual coding, integration of algorithms, and API construction, leading to prolonged development cycles and inflexible systems. Generative AI (Gen AI) brings a transformative shift by automating API creation for portfolio optimization processes, including investment goal setting, algorithm execution, and ensuring compliance with regulations. This paper delves into Gen AI's capability to produce scalable APIs for key stages such as asset selection, return estimation, algorithm implementation, and the application of real-world constraints like risk management and transaction costs. Furthermore, Gen AI enhances machine learning workflows, fostering rapid model experimentation, efficient tuning, and swift production deployment. By alleviating engineering complexities and enriching system adaptability, Gen AI lays the foundation for intelligent, flexible, and next-generation financial platforms. Generative AI in Financial Engineering Automated API Development for Portfolio Optimization Machine Learning Workflow Automation in Finance Risk Management APIs for Financial Systems Regulatory Compliance Automation with Gen AI Multi-Objective Optimization in Computational Finance Figures Figure 1 Figure 2 Figure 3 Figure 4 1. Introduction Portfolio optimization is a cornerstone of modern computational finance, enabling investors to construct portfolios tailored to their objectives while managing associated risks. However, traditional methods for building optimization systems are resource-intensive, requiring intricate manual integration of financial models, datasets, and computational tools. The introduction of Gen AI revolutionizes these workflows by automating the generation of APIs, which simplifies engineering efforts, reduces development cycles, and ensures enhanced flexibility [22]. This paper investigates Gen AI's contributions across the portfolio optimization lifecycle, emphasizing its potential for scalability, transparency, and regulatory compliance [14]. Generative AI (Gen AI) in financial systems refers to the use of advanced AI models primarily transformer-based large language models (LLMs) trained on vast corpora of code, financial documents, and structured data to automate software development tasks. These models can interpret natural language prompts and produce executable code artifacts, including APIs, ML pipelines, and compliance rules. Typical training datasets include open-source code repositories (e.g., GitHub), financial time series datasets, legal compliance documents, and structured market data. Fine-tuned Gen AI models, such as Codex or specialized financial LLMs, are capable of understanding domain-specific instructions and generating contextualized outputs aligned with regulatory and investment standards. 2. Defining Portfolio Objectives The foundation of portfolio optimization lies in aligning investment strategies with specific objectives. These objectives may vary by investor and strategy, ranging from maximizing returns and minimizing volatility to targeting Sharpe ratio improvements or adhering to ESG (Environmental, Social, Governance) principles. Dynamic API Generation Gen AI automates the creation of APIs capable of translating high-level objectives into actionable optimization parameters. For instance: Investors might specify their target return thresholds, acceptable risk levels, or preferred exposure to sectors like technology or healthcare. Gen AI-generated APIs dynamically interpret these preferences into robust optimization models. Example: ESG Integration A notable example involves integrating ESG constraints: Scenario : An investor wishes to exclude fossil fuel companies from their portfolio. Gen AI-powered APIs process ESG scoring models and automatically refine portfolio allocations to meet sustainability criteria. This allows rapid adaptation to evolving ethical and regulatory standards without compromising performance goals. 3. Asset Selection and Filtering The process of identifying and selecting appropriate assets is critical to constructing optimized portfolios. Traditionally, asset selection involves applying filters based on attributes like liquidity, risk profiles, market capitalization, and sector focus, often requiring manual intervention. Role of Gen AI APIs Gen AI streamlines this by generating APIs that automate the retrieval and categorization of assets based on real-time data sources: A fund manager could filter high-dividend yield stocks within the S&P 500. The API retrieves relevant financial data, applies custom filters, and categorizes assets by sector, geographical focus, or volatility metrics. Impact: By automating this step, Gen AI eliminates errors associated with manual screening and ensures portfolios achieve optimal diversification to meet investor goals efficiently. 4. Estimating Returns and Covariance Matrices Precise forecasting of asset returns, and an understanding of inter-asset correlations are crucial for portfolio optimization. Gen AI excels at automating API generation [20] for methodologies like the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM), [3] models, and machine learning [11]-based time series predictions. These APIs also calculate covariance matrices, serving as vital inputs for optimization engines. Consider estimating inter-asset correlations for a portfolio containing equities and fixed-income securities: Gen AI Workflow : APIs dynamically compute covariance matrices while integrating diagnostic tools to visualize the stability and accuracy of estimations. Such capabilities enable rapid iterations for portfolio modeling under varying market conditions. Additionally, diagnostic tools and visual analytics embedded within these APIs help users evaluate model reliability, estimation accuracy, and the overall effectiveness of forecasting techniques. 5. Implementation of Optimization Algorithms Optimization algorithms are essential for determining asset allocation within portfolios. Gen AI automates API creation for embedding these algorithms, ensuring efficient constraint handling and deployment. Below is an elaboration of major optimization models along with their respective advantages and disadvantages: Table 1. Comparison of Portfolio Optimization Algorithms Algorithm Description Advantages Disadvantages Mean-Variance Optimization Classical model that maximizes return for a given level of risk, assuming normal distributions and linear relationships. Simple, intuitive, well-established in finance. Sensitive to input estimation errors; assumes Gaussian returns. Black-Litterman Model Blends market equilibrium with investor views to generate more stable estimates of expected returns. Incorporates subjective views; reduces estimation error impact. Complex implementation requires priors and assumptions. Minimum Variance Portfolio Focuses on minimizing portfolio variance, regardless of expected return. Reduces exposure to volatile assets; low-risk strategy. May ignore potential returns; biased toward low-volatile assets. Risk Parity Allocates risk equally across assets instead of capital. Diversity risk contribution; stable across regimes. Requires accurate volatility and correlation estimates. Hierarchical Risk Parity (HRP) Uses clustering to build robust portfolios with diversified structure. Robust to noise; interpretable; avoids inversion of covariance matrix. Sensitive to clustering technique; less intuitive weights. Reinforcement Learning-based Optimization Treats asset allocation as a sequential decision problem and learns policies from market data. Adapts over time; models complex dynamics. Requires large data; less transparent; prone to overfitting. These APIs generated by Gen AI include built-in constraint handling, diagnostics, and integration hooks, making them well-suited for deployment in production financial systems. 6. Machine Learning Workflow Automation Machine learning plays an integral role in portfolio optimization by driving predictions, enhancing decision-making processes, and enabling scalability. With the complexity of these workflows, Gen AI simplifies and automates multiple steps to accelerate model deployment, reduce errors, and ensure reproducibility. Feature Engineering APIs Gen AI automates the creation of APIs for extracting technical indicators (e.g., moving averages, Bollinger bands), constructing macroeconomic overlays (e.g., inflation and GDP growth rates), and generating alternative data features (e.g., satellite data or social sentiment analysis). For instance: A fund manager can use an API to engineer features from weather data to predict commodity prices. By integrating external data such as rainfall or temperature, Gen AI offers context-specific features tailored to agricultural portfolio strategies. Model Selection APIs Gen AI-generated APIs help identify and deploy the most effective models for different prediction needs. For example: Predicting stock price movements might benefit from Long Short-Term Memory ([6]) networks for temporal dependencies, while [5] could be better suited for categorical features in credit risk models [13]. The APIs automatically analyze datasets, evaluate model performance across key metrics like R² and Mean Squared Error (MSE), and suggest optimal choices. Hyperparameter Tuning APIs Fine-tuning model parameters is crucial for achieving optimal performance. Gen AI automates this through APIs leveraging grid search, random search, and [7]: Consider a reinforcement learning framework for asset allocation. Gen AI's hyperparameter tuning [12] APIs can optimize learning rates, exploration strategies, and reward functions, reducing trial-and-error iterations and enhancing algorithmic performance. Case Study: Enhancing Algorithmic Trading Models A quantitative hedge fund leveraged Gen AI to automate feature engineering and model selection for its trading strategies. The system dynamically generated APIs that selected relevant features (e.g., liquidity ratios, volatility indicators), applied machine learning [11] models like Random Forests, and refined hyperparameters for improved predictive accuracy. This reduced the model development timeline by 40% while increasing overall prediction reliability by 15%. 7. Real-World Constraints and Compliance Portfolio optimization must operate within real-world constraints to reflect practical considerations such as transaction costs, risk management, and regulatory compliance [14]. Risk Management Gen AI automates the enforcement of risk management constraints: APIs can ensure that portfolios adhere to Value at Risk (VaR) or Conditional VaR (CVaR) thresholds. For example: A pension fund managing a $1 billion portfolio could use Gen AI-generated APIs to continuously monitor risk metrics, ensuring no more than a 5% probability of exceeding a $10 million loss over a 10-day horizon. Transaction Costs Transaction costs such as slippage, commission fees, and market impact often erode portfolio returns. Gen AI enables APIs to dynamically estimate and incorporate these costs: APIs might use historical trading data to predict slippage based on trade size and liquidity. A rebalancing strategy API could factor in these costs, optimizing trading frequency to maximize net returns. Regulatory Compliance Adhering to regulatory frameworks like MiFID II or UCITS is mandatory for institutional investors. Gen AI-generated APIs can: Automate jurisdictional rules by encoding compliance requirements. For example, an API may enforce sector exposure limits for ESG funds while maintaining alignment with European Union regulations. Case Study: JPMorgan Chase and Compliance Automation JPMorgan Chase, one of the largest financial institutions globally, has been at the forefront of leveraging artificial intelligence to enhance operational efficiency and regulatory compliance. The bank's Contract Intelligence (COiN) platform is a prime example of how Generative AI (Gen AI) can revolutionize traditional labor-intensive processes. Background Before the implementation of COiN, JPMorgan Chase faced significant challenges in processing and analyzing legal documents, particularly commercial loan agreements. These tasks required substantial human effort, with lawyers and loan officers spending approximately 360,000 hours annually reviewing and interpreting contracts[21]. The manual nature of this process made it prone to errors, inconsistencies, and inefficiencies, diverting resources from higher-value strategic activities. COiN Platform Overview Launched in 2017, the COiN platform utilizes machine learning and Gen AI technologies to automate the review and analysis of legal documents. The platform is powered by a private cloud network, enabling it to process thousands of contracts in seconds. Key features of COiN include: Clause Extraction : The platform identifies and extracts critical clauses, such as payment terms, renewal conditions, and termination rights, with remarkable accuracy. Error Reduction : By automating the interpretation of complex legal language, COiN significantly reduces errors that stem from human oversight. Efficiency Gains : Tasks that previously required hundreds of hours are now completed in mere seconds, freeing employees to focus on strategic decision-making. Impact on Compliance COiN has transformed JPMorgan Chase's approach to regulatory compliance in several ways: Automated Rule Validation : The platform ensures that contracts adhere to jurisdiction-specific regulations, such as MiFID II and Dodd-Frank, by flagging potential violations in real-time. Scalability : COiN's ability to process large volumes of documents enables the bank to scale its operations without compromising compliance standards. Cost Savings : By reducing the need for manual review, JPMorgan Chase has saved millions in operational costs while minimizing the risk of regulatory penalties. Broader Implications The success of COiN highlights the transformative potential of Gen AI in the financial sector. Beyond legal document review, JPMorgan Chase has extended its use of Gen AI to other areas, such as: Fraud Detection : APIs powered by Gen AI analyze transaction patterns to identify and prevent fraudulent activities. Risk Management : The bank employs Gen AI to simulate stress-testing scenarios, ensuring portfolios remain resilient under adverse market conditions. Conclusion JPMorgan Chase's COiN platform exemplifies how Gen AI can address complex challenges in compliance and operational efficiency. By automating labor-intensive tasks, the bank has not only enhanced its regulatory adherence but also positioned itself as a leader in AI-driven innovation within the financial industry. 8. Evaluation and Results To assess the practical effectiveness of Generative AI (Gen AI) in automating the portfolio optimization process, a comparative evaluation was conducted between traditional development workflows and Gen AI-powered pipelines. This evaluation focused on four critical stages: API development, feature engineering, model tuning, and compliance validation. The assessment was structured around real-world development scenarios within institutional asset management and quant trading environments. Metrics were collected across dimensions such as development cycle duration, engineering effort, reproducibility of outputs, and system adaptability. Each task was measured by time-to-deploy and technical complexity, with outcomes captured in a visual performance benchmark. 8.1 Development Time and Engineering Effort Feature engineering workflows saw a 60% reduction in manual iterations. For example, Gen AI automatically suggested and generated financial indicators such as Bollinger Bands, RSI, or macroeconomic overlays like inflation-adjusted trends. These components were generated as self-contained APIs, dramatically reducing human intervention. 8.2 Machine Learning Performance Gains In model tuning tasks, Gen AI-generated APIs employed advanced search techniques (e.g., [7]) to explore hyperparameter spaces more efficiently. As a result, the ML models exhibited measurable gains in prediction quality. On a representative financial dataset: R² score improved from 0.71 to 0.81 Mean Squared Error (MSE) decreased by approximately 12% Model selection time dropped by nearly 50% These improvements suggest that Gen AI not only accelerates experimentation cycles but also contributes to the overall robustness of model outcomes. 8.3 Compliance and Risk Automation Compliance validation also benefited from Gen AI's dynamic rule generation capabilities. APIs were able to automatically incorporate jurisdictional constraints (e.g., MiFID II, UCITS), flagging violations in near real-time. In simulated trading environments, Gen AI-based rule engines led to a 20% reduction in compliance issues compared to hand-coded rule sets. This automation proves valuable for risk-sensitive organizations such as pension funds, insurance portfolios, or ESG-aligned funds, where regulatory compliance [14] is non-negotiable and constantly evolving. 8.4 Summary of Observations The combined effect of Gen AI across all components included: Faster go-to-market for portfolio products and trading strategies Reduced engineering overhead and cross-team dependencies Higher accuracy and consistency in model predictions More agile governance controls and audit trails These outcomes reinforce Gen AI’s capability to act not just as a coding assistant but as a critical infrastructure layer for building scalable, intelligent financial systems. 9. Discussion and Existing Work The domain of portfolio optimization has evolved significantly, benefiting from advancements in machine learning [11], financial modeling, and computational technologies. However, traditional approaches often involve manual coding and integration efforts, which limit scalability and adaptability. Forecasting Prior studies, such as ARIMA or GARCH models, have been instrumental in time series forecasting. Yet, these methods often require manual tuning and fail to incorporate non-linear interactions. Gen AI addresses these gaps by generating APIs that integrate feature extraction pipelines and modern prediction models like [6] or Transformer networks. Optimization Classical models like [1]'s mean-variance optimization are foundational but exhibit limitations, including sensitivity to estimation errors. Gen AI-powered APIs enhance these models by incorporating real-time market data, allowing for dynamic adjustment to changing conditions. Constraints and Compliance While regulatory frameworks provide structure, they often necessitate substantial engineering resources for implementation. Custom-coding these frameworks for different jurisdictions remains a bottleneck. Gen AI streamlines this process by automatically generating APIs that encode compliance rules based on location-specific requirements. Existing Research Comparison Traditional Approaches : Deep neural networks or gradient-boosted trees, though powerful, demand significant setup time for deployment. Gen AI Advantage : By automating the API generation [20] process, Gen AI reduces time-to-market, enhances reproducibility, and minimizes engineering burdens. Table 2. Traditional Approaches vs Gen AI in Portfolio Optimization Category Prior Work / Model Focus Area Limitation Gen AI Advantage Forecasting ARIMA, GARCH [14], LSTM [17] Time series prediction Requires manual tuning and feature design Gen AI can auto-generate forecasting APIs with embedded feature pipelines Optimization Markowitz [1], Black-Litterman [2] Risk-return trade-off Sensitive to estimation errors APIs integrate real-time data, allowing adaptive inputs ML Integration XGBoost [5], Deep NN [10], Reinforcement Learning [12] Predictive modeling High complexity, deployment challenges Gen AI automates ML model API generation, tuning, and deployment Constraints & Compliance Risk-based frameworks [8][9], Regulatory filters [19] Legal & practical feasibility Custom coding required per jurisdiction Gen AI can generate rule-based compliance APIs on demand Case Study: Adaptive Portfolio Modeling An institutional investor implemented Gen AI to integrate reinforcement learning models for portfolio optimization [22]. Gen AI-enabled APIs dynamically adjusted input variables based on market conditions, outperforming traditional mean-variance strategies by 18% in back testing simulations. Despite the depth and maturity of existing financial models, they often lack seamless integration pipelines and require considerable engineering resources. Gen AI bridges this gap by enabling automated API construction, thereby reducing time-to-market and enhancing flexibility. Future versions of this research will extend the discussion covering seminal and emerging works in forecasting, AI for finance, and regulatory modeling. 10. Conclusion and Future Work Real-Time Rebalancing Future research can focus on APIs that enable real-time portfolio adjustments based on streaming data. For instance, APIs could integrate live market feeds to dynamically rebalance portfolios when macroeconomic indicators, like interest rates or inflation, surpass predefined thresholds. Multi-Asset Class Integration Expanding Gen AI to support multi-asset portfolios, including derivatives, commodities, and alternative investments, will enhance its versatility. For example, generating APIs to manage risk overlays for equity and fixed-income derivatives would address cross-asset hedging needs. Performance Benchmarking Rigorous benchmarking against traditional systems will solidify Gen AI's position in the industry. Performance metrics such as execution speed, scalability, accuracy, and cost efficiency should be analyzed. APIs could report Sharpe ratios, transaction costs, and drawdowns compared to benchmark indices. Ethical AI and Explainability and ethical AI practices will be paramount for gaining trust in Gen AI solutions. APIs capable of generating interpretable outputs, such as Shapley values or feature importance scores, will demonstrate transparency, allowing stakeholders to audit decisions effectively. Case Study: Hybrid Asset Allocation A prominent wealth management firm plans to adopt Gen AI APIs to develop a hybrid portfolio model combining active and passive strategies. The APIs will analyze market trends, identify high-performance assets, and incorporate passive ETFs for long-term stability. Preliminary tests project a 12% increase in overall return consistency compared to purely active management. Declarations Author Contribution L.R. conceptualized the study, designed the research framework, and wrote the main manuscript text. M.B. contributed to case study validation, assisted in technical review of Gen AI models, and helped refine the evaluation metrics. Both authors reviewed and approved the final manuscript. L.R. = Latha Ramamoorthy , M.B. = Merlin Balamurugan References H. Markowitz, "Portfolio Selection," Journal of Finance, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 77–91, 1952. F. Black and R. Litterman, "Global Portfolio Optimization," Financial Analysts Journal, vol. 48, no. 5, pp. 28–43, 1992. E. Fama and K. French, "Common Risk Factors in the Returns on Stocks and Bonds," Journal of Financial Economics, vol. 33, pp. 3–56, 1993. Y. Bengio, A. Courville, and P. Vincent, "Representation Learning: A Review and New Perspectives," IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 35, no. 8, pp. 1798–1828, 2013. T. Chen and C. Guestrin, "XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System," in Proc. ACM SIGKDD, pp. 785–794, 2016. S. Hochreiter and J. Schmidhuber, "Long Short-Term Memory," Neural Computation, vol. 9, no. 8, pp. 1735–1780, 1997. D. Bertsimas and R. Shioda, "Algorithm for cardinality-constrained quadratic optimization," Computational Optimization and Applications, vol. 43, pp. 1–22, 2009. A. Meucci, "Risk and Asset Allocation," Springer, 2005. R. Tütüncü and M. Koenig, "Robust asset allocation," Annals of Operations Research, vol. 132, no. 1–4, pp. 157–187, 2004. A. Krauss, X. Do, and N. Huck, "Deep neural networks, gradient-boosted trees, random forests: On the S&P 500," European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 259, no. 2, pp. 689–702, 2017. S. Boyd and L. Vandenberghe, "Convex Optimization," Cambridge University Press, 2004. D. Silver et al., "Mastering the Game of Go with Deep Neural Networks and Tree Search," Nature, vol. 529, pp. 484–489, 2016. A. B. Tiwari, S. Gupta, and N. Mittal, "Hierarchical Risk Parity: Accounting for Hierarchical Structure in Risk Allocation," The Journal of Financial Data Science, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 58–72, 2021. C. Chatfield, "The Analysis of Time Series: An Introduction," Chapman and Hall, 2003. B. Efron and R. Tibshirani, "An Introduction to the Bootstrap," CRC Press, 1994. M. López de Prado, "Advances in Financial Machine Learning," Wiley, 2018. T. Fischer and C. Krauss, "Deep learning with long short-term memory networks for financial market predictions," European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 270, no. 2, pp. 654–669, 2018. D. Gunning, "Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)," DARPA, 2017. P. Glasserman, "Monte Carlo Methods in Financial Engineering," Springer, 2004. T. Hommes, "Behavioral Rationality and Heterogeneous Expectations in Complex Economic Systems," Cambridge University Press, 2013. L. Ramamoorthy, "AI for Software Engineering - Enhancing Developer Experience with Codeium and Copilot," International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR), vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 444–449, Feb. 2025. L. Ramamoorthy, "Evaluating Generative AI: Challenges, Methods, and Future Directions," International Journal of Future Multidisciplinary Research, vol. 7, no. 1, Jan.-Feb. 2025. Additional Declarations No competing interests reported. Cite Share Download PDF Status: Under Review Version 1 posted Editorial decision: Revision requested 09 Jul, 2025 Reviewers agreed at journal 03 Jul, 2025 Reviews received at journal 03 Jul, 2025 Reviewers agreed at journal 03 Jul, 2025 Reviewers agreed at journal 03 Jul, 2025 Reviews received at journal 15 May, 2025 Reviewers agreed at journal 05 May, 2025 Reviewers agreed at journal 30 Apr, 2025 Reviewers invited by journal 30 Apr, 2025 Editor assigned by journal 23 Apr, 2025 Submission checks completed at journal 23 Apr, 2025 First submitted to journal 22 Apr, 2025 You are reading this latest preprint version Research Square lets you share your work early, gain feedback from the community, and start making changes to your manuscript prior to peer review in a journal. As a division of Research Square Company, we’re committed to making research communication faster, fairer, and more useful. We do this by developing innovative software and high quality services for the global research community. Our growing team is made up of researchers and industry professionals working together to solve the most critical problems facing scientific publishing. Also discoverable on Platform About Our Team In Review Editorial Policies Advisory Board Help Center Resources Author Services Accessibility API Access RSS feed Manage Cookie Preferences © Research Square 2026 | ISSN 2693-5015 (online) Privacy Policy Terms of Service Do Not Sell My Personal Information {"props":{"pageProps":{"initialData":{"identity":"rs-6507484","acceptedTermsAndConditions":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"archivedVersions":[],"articleType":"Short Report","associatedPublications":[],"authors":[{"id":452141933,"identity":"093fc5ba-8fa0-4607-ad58-4a58676d8c91","order_by":0,"name":"Latha Ramamoorthy","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Pondicherry University","correspondingAuthor":true,"prefix":"","firstName":"Latha","middleName":"","lastName":"Ramamoorthy","suffix":""},{"id":452141934,"identity":"b3a2bb45-bfc1-45fb-9429-fd9f982c8ec1","order_by":1,"name":"Merlin Balamurugan","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Leading banking Organization","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Merlin","middleName":"","lastName":"Balamurugan","suffix":""}],"badges":[],"createdAt":"2025-04-22 22:38:04","currentVersionCode":1,"declarations":"","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-6507484/v1","doiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-6507484/v1","draftVersion":[],"editorialEvents":[],"editorialNote":"","failedWorkflow":false,"files":[{"id":82067015,"identity":"43aeb5e5-9d35-40b7-858b-73f0fdd6fc98","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-05-06 12:40:41","extension":"png","order_by":1,"title":"Figure 1","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":44936,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eAPI Workflow for Portfolio Optimization\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"1.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-6507484/v1/38750d304f71f69a7f978471.png"},{"id":82067017,"identity":"2a4f10e2-84b3-4b6d-9ed4-0427fbc17460","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-05-06 12:40:41","extension":"png","order_by":2,"title":"Figure 2","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":37042,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eEstimating Returns and Co-variances\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"2.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-6507484/v1/1e30f2b334422de185ce3a57.png"},{"id":82067018,"identity":"8448437a-c961-47a6-b9f4-eebb2d66c338","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-05-06 12:40:41","extension":"png","order_by":3,"title":"Figure 3","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":59919,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eEfficiency Comparison Between Traditional Workflows and Gen AI\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"3.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-6507484/v1/ae27de71f762285e7faffa75.png"},{"id":82067016,"identity":"35d15861-ef0a-4b9f-b8b2-a7709a6e4d34","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-05-06 12:40:41","extension":"png","order_by":4,"title":"Figure 4","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":144799,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eGen AI Advantages in Portfolio Optimization\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"4.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-6507484/v1/7ec18ff85a178997bcb68607.png"},{"id":82069103,"identity":"1431c326-71a0-4b16-9c85-961f8918e48e","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-05-06 13:04:42","extension":"pdf","order_by":0,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"manuscript-pdf","size":1362645,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"manuscript.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-6507484/v1/3a0f514a-7f6f-45d2-a660-0dc8408e563f.pdf"}],"financialInterests":"No competing interests reported.","formattedTitle":"Gen AI for API Generation in Portfolio Optimization","fulltext":[{"header":"1. Introduction","content":"\u003cp\u003ePortfolio optimization is a cornerstone of modern computational finance, enabling investors to construct portfolios tailored to their objectives while managing associated risks. However, traditional methods for building optimization systems are resource-intensive, requiring intricate manual integration of financial models, datasets, and computational tools.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe introduction of Gen AI revolutionizes these workflows by automating the generation of APIs, which simplifies engineering efforts, reduces development cycles, and ensures enhanced flexibility [22]. This paper investigates Gen AI\u0026apos;s contributions across the portfolio optimization lifecycle, emphasizing its potential for scalability, transparency, and regulatory compliance [14].\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eGenerative AI (Gen AI) in financial systems refers to the use of advanced AI models primarily transformer-based large language models (LLMs) trained on vast corpora of code, financial documents, and structured data to automate software development tasks. These models can interpret natural language prompts and produce executable code artifacts, including APIs, ML pipelines, and compliance rules. Typical training datasets include open-source code repositories (e.g., GitHub), financial time series datasets, legal compliance documents, and structured market data. Fine-tuned Gen AI models, such as Codex or specialized financial LLMs, are capable of understanding domain-specific instructions and generating contextualized outputs aligned with regulatory and investment standards.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"2. Defining Portfolio Objectives","content":"\u003cp\u003eThe foundation of portfolio optimization lies in aligning investment strategies with specific objectives. These objectives may vary by investor and strategy, ranging from maximizing returns and minimizing volatility to targeting Sharpe ratio improvements or adhering to ESG (Environmental, Social, Governance) principles.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eDynamic API Generation\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eGen AI automates the creation of APIs capable of translating high-level objectives into actionable optimization parameters. For instance:\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eInvestors might specify their target return thresholds, acceptable risk levels, or preferred exposure to sectors like technology or healthcare. Gen AI-generated APIs dynamically interpret these preferences into robust optimization models.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eExample: ESG Integration\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eA notable example involves integrating ESG constraints:\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n \u003cli\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eScenario\u003c/strong\u003e: An investor wishes to exclude fossil fuel companies from their portfolio. Gen AI-powered APIs process ESG scoring models and automatically refine portfolio allocations to meet sustainability criteria. This allows rapid adaptation to evolving ethical and regulatory standards without compromising performance goals.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e"},{"header":"3. Asset Selection and Filtering","content":"\u003cp\u003eThe process of identifying and selecting appropriate assets is critical to constructing optimized portfolios. Traditionally, asset selection involves applying filters based on attributes like liquidity, risk profiles, market capitalization, and sector focus, often requiring manual intervention.\u003cstrong\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eRole of Gen AI APIs\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eGen AI streamlines this by generating APIs that automate the retrieval and categorization of assets based on real-time data sources:\u003cstrong\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eA fund manager could filter high-dividend yield stocks within the S\u0026amp;P 500. The API retrieves relevant financial data, applies custom filters, and categorizes assets by sector, geographical focus, or volatility metrics.\u003cstrong\u003e\u0026nbsp;Impact: By\u003c/strong\u003e automating this step, Gen AI eliminates errors associated with manual screening and ensures portfolios achieve optimal diversification to meet investor goals efficiently.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"4. Estimating Returns and Covariance Matrices","content":"\u003cp\u003ePrecise forecasting of asset returns, and an understanding of inter-asset correlations are crucial for portfolio optimization. Gen AI excels at automating API generation [20] for methodologies like the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM), [3] models, and machine learning [11]-based time series predictions. These APIs also calculate covariance matrices, serving as vital inputs for optimization engines.\u003cstrong\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eConsider estimating inter-asset correlations for a portfolio containing equities and fixed-income securities:\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eGen AI Workflow\u003c/strong\u003e: APIs dynamically compute covariance matrices while integrating diagnostic tools to visualize the stability and accuracy of estimations. Such capabilities enable rapid iterations for portfolio modeling under varying market conditions.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAdditionally, diagnostic tools and visual analytics embedded within these APIs help users evaluate model reliability, estimation accuracy, and the overall effectiveness of forecasting techniques.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"5. Implementation of Optimization Algorithms","content":"\u003cp\u003eOptimization algorithms are essential for determining asset allocation within portfolios. Gen AI automates API creation for embedding these algorithms, ensuring efficient constraint handling and deployment. Below is an elaboration of major optimization models along with their respective advantages and disadvantages:\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eTable 1. Comparison of Portfolio Optimization Algorithms\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ctable border=\"1\" cellspacing=\"0\" cellpadding=\"0\" width=\"567\"\u003e\n \u003ctbody\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 122px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eAlgorithm\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 145px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eDescription\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 145px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eAdvantages\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 156px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eDisadvantages\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 122px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eMean-Variance Optimization\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 145px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eClassical model that maximizes return for a given level of risk, assuming normal distributions and linear relationships.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 145px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eSimple, intuitive, well-established in finance.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 156px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eSensitive to input estimation errors; assumes Gaussian returns.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 122px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eBlack-Litterman Model\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 145px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eBlends market equilibrium with investor views to generate more stable estimates of expected returns.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 145px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eIncorporates subjective views; reduces estimation error impact.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 156px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eComplex implementation requires priors and assumptions.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 122px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eMinimum Variance Portfolio\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 145px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eFocuses on minimizing portfolio variance, regardless of expected return.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 145px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eReduces exposure to volatile assets; low-risk strategy.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 156px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eMay ignore potential returns; biased toward low-volatile assets.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 122px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eRisk Parity\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 145px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eAllocates risk equally across assets instead of capital.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 145px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eDiversity risk contribution; stable across regimes.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 156px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eRequires accurate volatility and correlation estimates.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 122px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eHierarchical Risk Parity (HRP)\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 145px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eUses clustering to build robust portfolios with diversified structure.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 145px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eRobust to noise; interpretable; avoids inversion of covariance matrix.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 156px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eSensitive to clustering technique; less intuitive weights.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 122px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eReinforcement Learning-based Optimization\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 145px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eTreats asset allocation as a sequential decision problem and learns policies from market data.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 145px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eAdapts over time; models complex dynamics.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 156px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eRequires large data; less transparent; prone to overfitting.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003c/tbody\u003e\n\u003c/table\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThese APIs generated by Gen AI include built-in constraint handling, diagnostics, and integration hooks, making them well-suited for deployment in production financial systems.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"6. Machine Learning Workflow Automation","content":"\u003cp\u003eMachine learning plays an integral role in portfolio optimization by driving predictions, enhancing decision-making processes, and enabling scalability. With the complexity of these workflows, Gen AI simplifies and automates multiple steps to accelerate model deployment, reduce errors, and ensure reproducibility.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eFeature Engineering APIs\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eGen AI automates the creation of APIs for extracting technical indicators (e.g., moving averages, Bollinger bands), constructing macroeconomic overlays (e.g., inflation and GDP growth rates), and generating alternative data features (e.g., satellite data or social sentiment analysis). For instance:\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eA fund manager can use an API to engineer features from weather data to predict commodity prices. By integrating external data such as rainfall or temperature, Gen AI offers context-specific features tailored to agricultural portfolio strategies.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eModel Selection APIs\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eGen AI-generated APIs help identify and deploy the most effective models for different prediction needs. For example:\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePredicting stock price movements might benefit from Long Short-Term Memory ([6]) networks for temporal dependencies, while [5] could be better suited for categorical features in credit risk models [13]. The APIs automatically analyze datasets, evaluate model performance across key metrics like R\u0026sup2; and Mean Squared Error (MSE), and suggest optimal choices.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eHyperparameter Tuning APIs\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eFine-tuning model parameters is crucial for achieving optimal performance. Gen AI automates this through APIs leveraging grid search, random search, and [7]:\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eConsider a reinforcement learning framework for asset allocation. Gen AI\u0026apos;s hyperparameter tuning [12] APIs can optimize learning rates, exploration strategies, and reward functions, reducing trial-and-error iterations and enhancing algorithmic performance.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCase Study: Enhancing Algorithmic Trading Models\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eA quantitative hedge fund leveraged Gen AI to automate feature engineering and model selection for its trading strategies. The system dynamically generated APIs that selected relevant features (e.g., liquidity ratios, volatility indicators), applied machine learning [11] models like Random Forests, and refined hyperparameters for improved predictive accuracy. This reduced the model development timeline by 40% while increasing overall prediction reliability by 15%.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"7. Real-World Constraints and Compliance","content":"\u003cp\u003ePortfolio optimization must operate within real-world constraints to reflect practical considerations such as transaction costs, risk management, and regulatory compliance [14].\u003cstrong\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eRisk Management\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eGen AI automates the enforcement of risk management constraints:\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eAPIs can ensure that portfolios adhere to Value at Risk (VaR) or Conditional VaR (CVaR) thresholds. For example:\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eA pension fund managing a $1 billion portfolio could use Gen AI-generated APIs to continuously monitor risk metrics, ensuring no more than a 5% probability of exceeding a $10 million loss over a 10-day horizon.\u003cstrong\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eTransaction Costs\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eTransaction costs such as slippage, commission fees, and market impact often erode portfolio returns. Gen AI enables APIs to dynamically estimate and incorporate these costs:\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAPIs might use historical trading data to predict slippage based on trade size and liquidity. A rebalancing strategy API could factor in these costs, optimizing trading frequency to maximize net returns.\u003cstrong\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eRegulatory Compliance\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAdhering to regulatory frameworks like MiFID II or UCITS is mandatory for institutional investors. Gen AI-generated APIs can:\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAutomate jurisdictional rules by encoding compliance requirements. For example, an API may enforce sector exposure limits for ESG funds while maintaining alignment with European Union regulations.\u003cstrong\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCase Study: JPMorgan Chase and Compliance Automation\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eJPMorgan Chase, one of the largest financial institutions globally, has been at the forefront of leveraging artificial intelligence to enhance operational efficiency and regulatory compliance. The bank\u0026apos;s Contract Intelligence (COiN) platform is a prime example of how Generative AI (Gen AI) can revolutionize traditional labor-intensive processes.\u003cstrong\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eBackground\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eBefore the implementation of COiN, JPMorgan Chase faced significant challenges in processing and analyzing legal documents, particularly commercial loan agreements. These tasks required substantial human effort, with lawyers and loan officers spending approximately 360,000 hours annually reviewing and interpreting contracts[21]. The manual nature of this process made it prone to errors, inconsistencies, and inefficiencies, diverting resources from higher-value strategic activities.\u003cstrong\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCOiN Platform Overview\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eLaunched in 2017, the COiN platform utilizes machine learning and Gen AI technologies to automate the review and analysis of legal documents. The platform is powered by a private cloud network, enabling it to process thousands of contracts in seconds. Key features of COiN include:\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n \u003cli\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eClause Extraction\u003c/strong\u003e: The platform identifies and extracts critical clauses, such as payment terms, renewal conditions, and termination rights, with remarkable accuracy.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eError Reduction\u003c/strong\u003e: By automating the interpretation of complex legal language, COiN significantly reduces errors that stem from human oversight.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eEfficiency Gains\u003c/strong\u003e: Tasks that previously required hundreds of hours are now completed in mere seconds, freeing employees to focus on strategic decision-making.\u003cstrong\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eImpact on Compliance\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eCOiN has transformed JPMorgan Chase\u0026apos;s approach to regulatory compliance in several ways:\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n \u003cli\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eAutomated Rule Validation\u003c/strong\u003e: The platform ensures that contracts adhere to jurisdiction-specific regulations, such as MiFID II and Dodd-Frank, by flagging potential violations in real-time.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eScalability\u003c/strong\u003e: COiN\u0026apos;s ability to process large volumes of documents enables the bank to scale its operations without compromising compliance standards.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCost Savings\u003c/strong\u003e: By reducing the need for manual review, JPMorgan Chase has saved millions in operational costs while minimizing the risk of regulatory penalties.\u003cstrong\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eBroader Implications\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe success of COiN highlights the transformative potential of Gen AI in the financial sector. Beyond legal document review, JPMorgan Chase has extended its use of Gen AI to other areas, such as:\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n \u003cli\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eFraud Detection\u003c/strong\u003e: APIs powered by Gen AI analyze transaction patterns to identify and prevent fraudulent activities.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eRisk Management\u003c/strong\u003e: The bank employs Gen AI to simulate stress-testing scenarios, ensuring portfolios remain resilient under adverse market conditions.\u003cstrong\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eConclusion\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eJPMorgan Chase\u0026apos;s COiN platform exemplifies how Gen AI can address complex challenges in compliance and operational efficiency. By automating labor-intensive tasks, the bank has not only enhanced its regulatory adherence but also positioned itself as a leader in AI-driven innovation within the financial industry.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"8. Evaluation and Results","content":"\u003cp\u003eTo assess the practical effectiveness of Generative AI (Gen AI) in automating the portfolio optimization process, a comparative evaluation was conducted between traditional development workflows and Gen AI-powered pipelines. This evaluation focused on four critical stages: API development, feature engineering, model tuning, and compliance validation.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe assessment was structured around real-world development scenarios within institutional asset management and quant trading environments. Metrics were collected across dimensions such as development cycle duration, engineering effort, reproducibility of outputs, and system adaptability. Each task was measured by time-to-deploy and technical complexity, with outcomes captured in a visual performance benchmark.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e8.1 Development Time and Engineering Effort\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eFeature engineering workflows saw a 60% reduction in manual iterations. For example, Gen AI automatically suggested and generated financial indicators such as Bollinger Bands, RSI, or macroeconomic overlays like inflation-adjusted trends. These components were generated as self-contained APIs, dramatically reducing human intervention.\u003cstrong\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e8.2 Machine Learning Performance Gains\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIn model tuning tasks, Gen AI-generated APIs employed advanced search techniques (e.g., [7]) to explore hyperparameter spaces more efficiently. As a result, the ML models exhibited measurable gains in prediction quality. On a representative financial dataset:\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cul type=\"disc\"\u003e\n \u003cli\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eR\u0026sup2; score\u003c/strong\u003e improved from 0.71 to 0.81\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eMean Squared Error (MSE)\u003c/strong\u003e decreased by approximately 12%\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eModel selection time\u003c/strong\u003e dropped by nearly 50%\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThese improvements suggest that Gen AI not only accelerates experimentation cycles but also contributes to the overall robustness of model outcomes.\u003cstrong\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e8.3 Compliance and Risk Automation\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eCompliance validation also benefited from Gen AI\u0026apos;s dynamic rule generation capabilities. APIs were able to automatically incorporate jurisdictional constraints (e.g., MiFID II, UCITS), flagging violations in near real-time. In simulated trading environments, Gen AI-based rule engines led to a 20% reduction in compliance issues compared to hand-coded rule sets.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThis automation proves valuable for risk-sensitive organizations such as pension funds, insurance portfolios, or ESG-aligned funds, where regulatory compliance [14] is non-negotiable and constantly evolving.\u003cstrong\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e8.4 Summary of Observations\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe combined effect of Gen AI across all components included:\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cul type=\"disc\"\u003e\n \u003cli\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eFaster go-to-market\u003c/strong\u003e for portfolio products and trading strategies\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eReduced engineering overhead\u003c/strong\u003e and cross-team dependencies\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eHigher accuracy and consistency\u003c/strong\u003e in model predictions\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eMore agile governance controls\u003c/strong\u003e and audit trails\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThese outcomes reinforce Gen AI\u0026rsquo;s capability to act not just as a coding assistant but as a critical infrastructure layer for building scalable, intelligent financial systems.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"9. Discussion and Existing Work","content":"\u003cp\u003eThe domain of portfolio optimization has evolved significantly, benefiting from advancements in machine learning [11], financial modeling, and computational technologies. However, traditional approaches often involve manual coding and integration efforts, which limit scalability and adaptability.\u003cstrong\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eForecasting\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePrior studies, such as ARIMA or GARCH models, have been instrumental in time series forecasting. Yet, these methods often require manual tuning and fail to incorporate non-linear interactions. Gen AI addresses these gaps by generating APIs that integrate feature extraction pipelines and modern prediction models like [6] or Transformer networks.\u003cstrong\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eOptimization\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eClassical models like [1]\u0026apos;s mean-variance optimization are foundational but exhibit limitations, including sensitivity to estimation errors. Gen AI-powered APIs enhance these models by incorporating real-time market data, allowing for dynamic adjustment to changing conditions.\u003cstrong\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eConstraints and Compliance\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eWhile regulatory frameworks provide structure, they often necessitate substantial engineering resources for implementation. Custom-coding these frameworks for different jurisdictions remains a bottleneck. Gen AI streamlines this process by automatically generating APIs that encode compliance rules based on location-specific requirements.\u003cstrong\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eExisting Research Comparison\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eTraditional Approaches\u003c/strong\u003e: Deep neural networks or gradient-boosted trees, though powerful, demand significant setup time for deployment.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eGen AI Advantage\u003c/strong\u003e: By automating the API generation [20] process, Gen AI reduces time-to-market, enhances reproducibility, and minimizes engineering burdens.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eTable 2. Traditional Approaches vs Gen AI in Portfolio Optimization\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ctable border=\"1\" cellspacing=\"0\" cellpadding=\"0\"\u003e\n \u003ctbody\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 134px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCategory\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 140px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003ePrior Work / Model\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 104px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eFocus Area\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 116px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eLimitation\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 116px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eGen AI Advantage\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 134px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eForecasting\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 140px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eARIMA, GARCH [14], LSTM [17]\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 104px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eTime series prediction\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 116px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eRequires manual tuning and feature design\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 116px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eGen AI can auto-generate forecasting APIs with embedded feature pipelines\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 134px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eOptimization\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 140px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eMarkowitz [1], Black-Litterman [2]\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 104px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eRisk-return trade-off\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 116px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eSensitive to estimation errors\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 116px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eAPIs integrate real-time data, allowing adaptive inputs\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 134px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eML Integration\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 140px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eXGBoost [5], Deep NN [10], Reinforcement Learning [12]\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 104px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003ePredictive modeling\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 116px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eHigh complexity, deployment challenges\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 116px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eGen AI automates ML model API generation, tuning, and deployment\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 134px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eConstraints \u0026amp; Compliance\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 140px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eRisk-based frameworks [8][9], Regulatory filters [19]\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 104px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eLegal \u0026amp; practical feasibility\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 116px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eCustom coding required per jurisdiction\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 116px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eGen AI can generate rule-based compliance APIs on demand\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003c/tbody\u003e\n\u003c/table\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCase Study: Adaptive Portfolio Modeling\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAn institutional investor implemented Gen AI to integrate reinforcement learning models for portfolio optimization [22]. Gen AI-enabled APIs dynamically adjusted input variables based on market conditions, outperforming traditional mean-variance strategies by 18% in back testing simulations.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDespite the depth and maturity of existing financial models, they often lack seamless integration pipelines and require considerable engineering resources. Gen AI bridges this gap by enabling automated API construction, thereby reducing time-to-market and enhancing flexibility.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eFuture versions of this research will extend the discussion covering seminal and emerging works in forecasting, AI for finance, and regulatory modeling.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"10. Conclusion and Future Work","content":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eReal-Time Rebalancing\u003c/strong\u003e Future research can focus on APIs that enable real-time portfolio adjustments based on streaming data. For instance, APIs could integrate live market feeds to dynamically rebalance portfolios when macroeconomic indicators, like interest rates or inflation, surpass predefined thresholds.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eMulti-Asset Class Integration\u003c/strong\u003e Expanding Gen AI to support multi-asset portfolios, including derivatives, commodities, and alternative investments, will enhance its versatility. For example, generating APIs to manage risk overlays for equity and fixed-income derivatives would address cross-asset hedging needs.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePerformance Benchmarking Rigorous benchmarking against traditional systems will solidify Gen AI\u0026apos;s position in the industry. Performance metrics such as execution speed, scalability, accuracy, and cost efficiency should be analyzed. APIs could report Sharpe ratios, transaction costs, and drawdowns compared to benchmark indices.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eEthical AI and Explainability\u003c/strong\u003e and ethical AI practices will be paramount for gaining trust in Gen AI solutions. APIs capable of generating interpretable outputs, such as Shapley values or feature importance scores, will demonstrate transparency, allowing stakeholders to audit decisions effectively.\u003cstrong\u003e\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCase Study: Hybrid Asset Allocation\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eA prominent wealth management firm plans to adopt Gen AI APIs to develop a hybrid portfolio model combining active and passive strategies. The APIs will analyze market trends, identify high-performance assets, and incorporate passive ETFs for long-term stability. Preliminary tests project a 12% increase in overall return consistency compared to purely active management.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Declarations","content":"\u003ch2\u003eAuthor Contribution\u003c/h2\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eL.R. conceptualized the study, designed the research framework, and wrote the main manuscript text. M.B. contributed to case study validation, assisted in technical review of Gen AI models, and helped refine the evaluation metrics. Both authors reviewed and approved the final manuscript. L.R. = Latha Ramamoorthy , M.B. = Merlin Balamurugan\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"References","content":"\u003col\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eH. Markowitz, \u0026quot;Portfolio Selection,\u0026quot; Journal of Finance, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 77\u0026ndash;91, 1952.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eF. Black and R. Litterman, \u0026quot;Global Portfolio Optimization,\u0026quot; Financial Analysts Journal, vol. 48, no. 5, pp. 28\u0026ndash;43, 1992. \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eE. Fama and K. French, \u0026quot;Common Risk Factors in the Returns on Stocks and Bonds,\u0026quot; Journal of Financial Economics, vol. 33, pp. 3\u0026ndash;56, 1993. \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eY. Bengio, A. Courville, and P. Vincent, \u0026quot;Representation Learning: A Review and New Perspectives,\u0026quot; IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 35, no. 8, pp. 1798\u0026ndash;1828, 2013. \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eT. Chen and C. Guestrin, \u0026quot;XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System,\u0026quot; in Proc. ACM SIGKDD, pp. 785\u0026ndash;794, 2016. \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eS. Hochreiter and J. Schmidhuber, \u0026quot;Long Short-Term Memory,\u0026quot; Neural Computation, vol. 9, no. 8, pp. 1735\u0026ndash;1780, 1997. \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eD. Bertsimas and R. Shioda, \u0026quot;Algorithm for cardinality-constrained quadratic optimization,\u0026quot; Computational Optimization and Applications, vol. 43, pp. 1\u0026ndash;22, 2009. \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eA. Meucci, \u0026quot;Risk and Asset Allocation,\u0026quot; Springer, 2005.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eR. T\u0026uuml;t\u0026uuml;nc\u0026uuml; and M. Koenig, \u0026quot;Robust asset allocation,\u0026quot; Annals of Operations Research, vol. 132, no. 1\u0026ndash;4, pp. 157\u0026ndash;187, 2004. \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eA. Krauss, X. Do, and N. Huck, \u0026quot;Deep neural networks, gradient-boosted trees, random forests: On the S\u0026amp;P 500,\u0026quot; European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 259, no. 2, pp. 689\u0026ndash;702, 2017. \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eS. Boyd and L. Vandenberghe, \u0026quot;Convex Optimization,\u0026quot; Cambridge University Press, 2004. \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eD. Silver et al., \u0026quot;Mastering the Game of Go with Deep Neural Networks and Tree Search,\u0026quot; Nature, vol. 529, pp. 484\u0026ndash;489, 2016. \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eA. B. Tiwari, S. Gupta, and N. Mittal, \u0026quot;Hierarchical Risk Parity: Accounting for Hierarchical Structure in Risk Allocation,\u0026quot; The Journal of Financial Data Science, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 58\u0026ndash;72, 2021. \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eC. Chatfield, \u0026quot;The Analysis of Time Series: An Introduction,\u0026quot; Chapman and Hall, 2003.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eB. Efron and R. Tibshirani, \u0026quot;An Introduction to the Bootstrap,\u0026quot; CRC Press, 1994. \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eM. L\u0026oacute;pez de Prado, \u0026quot;Advances in Financial Machine Learning,\u0026quot; Wiley, 2018. \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eT. Fischer and C. Krauss, \u0026quot;Deep learning with long short-term memory networks for financial market predictions,\u0026quot; European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 270, no. 2, pp. 654\u0026ndash;669, 2018. \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eD. Gunning, \u0026quot;Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI),\u0026quot; DARPA, 2017. \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eP. Glasserman, \u0026quot;Monte Carlo Methods in Financial Engineering,\u0026quot; Springer, 2004. \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eT. Hommes, \u0026quot;Behavioral Rationality and Heterogeneous Expectations in Complex Economic Systems,\u0026quot; Cambridge University Press, 2013. \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eL. Ramamoorthy, \u0026quot;AI for Software Engineering - Enhancing Developer Experience with Codeium and Copilot,\u0026quot; International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR), vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 444\u0026ndash;449, Feb. 2025. \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eL. Ramamoorthy, \u0026quot;Evaluating Generative AI: Challenges, Methods, and Future Directions,\u0026quot; International Journal of Future Multidisciplinary Research, vol. 7, no. 1, Jan.-Feb. 2025.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ol\u003e"}],"fulltextSource":"","fullText":"","funders":[],"hasAdminPriorityOnWorkflow":false,"hasManuscriptDocX":true,"hasOptedInToPreprint":true,"hasPassedJournalQc":"","hasAnyPriority":false,"hideJournal":false,"highlight":"","institution":"","isAcceptedByJournal":true,"isAuthorSuppliedPdf":false,"isDeskRejected":"","isHiddenFromSearch":false,"isInQc":false,"isInWorkflow":false,"isPdf":false,"isPdfUpToDate":true,"isWithdrawnOrRetracted":false,"journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"digital-finance","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"externalIdentity":"dfin","sideBox":"Learn more about [Digital Finance](http://link.springer.com/journal/42521)","snPcode":"42521","submissionUrl":"https://submission.nature.com/new-submission/42521/3","title":"Digital Finance","twitterHandle":"","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":true,"editorialSystem":"em","reportingPortfolio":"Springer Hybrid","inReviewEnabled":true,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":false},"keywords":"Generative AI in Financial Engineering, Automated API Development for Portfolio Optimization, Machine Learning Workflow Automation in Finance, Risk Management APIs for Financial Systems, Regulatory Compliance Automation with Gen AI, Multi-Objective Optimization in Computational Finance","lastPublishedDoi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-6507484/v1","lastPublishedDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-6507484/v1","license":{"name":"CC BY 4.0","url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"manuscriptAbstract":"\u003cp\u003ePortfolio optimization is pivotal in helping investors balance risk and achieve their financial goals. Traditional development methods rely heavily on manual coding, integration of algorithms, and API construction, leading to prolonged development cycles and inflexible systems. Generative AI (Gen AI) brings a transformative shift by automating API creation for portfolio optimization processes, including investment goal setting, algorithm execution, and ensuring compliance with regulations.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThis paper delves into Gen AI's capability to produce scalable APIs for key stages such as asset selection, return estimation, algorithm implementation, and the application of real-world constraints like risk management and transaction costs. Furthermore, Gen AI enhances machine learning workflows, fostering rapid model experimentation, efficient tuning, and swift production deployment. By alleviating engineering complexities and enriching system adaptability, Gen AI lays the foundation for intelligent, flexible, and next-generation financial platforms.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003c/p\u003e","manuscriptTitle":"Gen AI for API Generation in Portfolio Optimization","msid":"","msnumber":"","nonDraftVersions":[{"code":1,"date":"2025-05-06 12:40:37","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-6507484/v1","editorialEvents":[{"type":"communityComments","content":0},{"type":"decision","content":"Revision requested","date":"2025-07-09T13:53:31+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"reviewerAgreed","content":"252604088319853059275213655167162427652","date":"2025-07-03T18:04:59+00:00","index":"hide","fulltext":""},{"type":"editorInvitedReview","content":"","date":"2025-07-03T16:53:43+00:00","index":"hide","fulltext":""},{"type":"reviewerAgreed","content":"192375311150420386232896291314527426479","date":"2025-07-03T13:38:34+00:00","index":"hide","fulltext":""},{"type":"reviewerAgreed","content":"8137983556038574653562062516529832462","date":"2025-07-03T10:40:42+00:00","index":"hide","fulltext":""},{"type":"editorInvitedReview","content":"","date":"2025-05-15T11:14:15+00:00","index":"hide","fulltext":""},{"type":"reviewerAgreed","content":"302227043305810127305955554875762343972","date":"2025-05-05T14:13:58+00:00","index":"hide","fulltext":""},{"type":"reviewerAgreed","content":"30358365987923057656222577064739196775","date":"2025-04-30T14:19:54+00:00","index":"hide","fulltext":""},{"type":"reviewersInvited","content":"","date":"2025-04-30T14:06:40+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"editorAssigned","content":"","date":"2025-04-23T17:12:19+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"checksComplete","content":"","date":"2025-04-23T11:19:27+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"submitted","content":"Digital Finance","date":"2025-04-22T22:22:35+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""}],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"digital-finance","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"externalIdentity":"dfin","sideBox":"Learn more about [Digital Finance](http://link.springer.com/journal/42521)","snPcode":"42521","submissionUrl":"https://submission.nature.com/new-submission/42521/3","title":"Digital Finance","twitterHandle":"","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":true,"editorialSystem":"em","reportingPortfolio":"Springer Hybrid","inReviewEnabled":true,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":false}}],"origin":"","ownerIdentity":"e5fc6ff3-8939-447d-a4dc-653f245d5e70","owner":[],"postedDate":"May 6th, 2025","published":true,"recentEditorialEvents":[],"rejectedJournal":[],"revision":"","amendment":"","status":"under-review","subjectAreas":[],"tags":[],"updatedAt":"2025-11-20T06:23:34+00:00","versionOfRecord":[],"versionCreatedAt":"2025-05-06 12:40:37","video":"","vorDoi":"","vorDoiUrl":"","workflowStages":[]},"version":"v1","identity":"rs-6507484","journalConfig":"researchsquare"},"__N_SSP":true},"page":"/article/[identity]/[[...version]]","query":{"redirect":"/article/rs-6507484","identity":"rs-6507484","version":["v1"]},"buildId":"8U1c8b4HqxoKbykW_rLl7","isFallback":false,"isExperimentalCompile":false,"dynamicIds":[84888],"gssp":true,"scriptLoader":[]}