Landscape drivers of population density of a vulnerable apex predator (Wilkerr/dingo)

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-4.0

Abstract

Apex predators shape ecosystems globally, yet robust monitoring that assesses the effects of management actions and environmental variation on their populations is challenging. The dingo, Australia’s largest terrestrial predator, is ecologically and culturally significant. In many parts of Australia, dingoes now exist in fragmented and isolated populations, and our understanding of how their population abundance and distribution is influenced by environmental and anthropogenic factors is limited. Here, we employed a flexible spatial mark–resight (SMR) modelling framework with strategically placed camera traps to estimate the density of an isolated and genetically distinct dingo population across a fire- and drought-prone, water-limited, semi-arid region of southern Australia. Our approach addressed detection challenges in remote landscapes and enabled the integration of key environmental covariates—including water availability, road proximity, and fire regime—to better understand spatial variation in dingo density. From over two million camera trap images, we identified 20 unique individuals at 38 locations using a combination of machine learning and manual validation. Dingo abundance and density was estimated as 77 (64–94) individuals and 0.014 (0.012–0.017) dingoes/km²—lower than previously reported estimates—and varied significantly in response to aspects of the fire regime and distance from roads. Our findings highlight the value of integrating environmental covariates and resource-focused sampling strategies to improve detection, population estimates and inference of environmental preferences of large carnivores. Our approach can be adopted elsewhere to help inform management of landscapes and apex predator populations through robust population estimation of low-density carnivore populations in remote area contexts.
Full text 2,677 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 1 of this Preprint. You must log in to post a comment. There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article. This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 1 of this Preprint. Add a Comment You must log in to post a comment. Comments There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article. Apex predators shape ecosystems globally, yet robust monitoring that assesses the effects of management actions and environmental variation on their populations is challenging. The dingo, Australia’s largest terrestrial predator, is ecologically and culturally significant. In many parts of Australia, dingoes now exist in fragmented and isolated populations, and our understanding of how their population abundance and distribution is influenced by environmental and anthropogenic factors is limited. Here, we employed a flexible spatial mark–resight (SMR) modelling framework with strategically placed camera traps to estimate the density of an isolated and genetically distinct dingo population across a fire- and drought-prone, water-limited, semi-arid region of southern Australia. Our approach addressed detection challenges in remote landscapes and enabled the integration of key environmental covariates—including water availability, road proximity, and fire regime—to better understand spatial variation in dingo density. From over two million camera trap images, we identified 20 unique individuals at 38 locations using a combination of machine learning and manual validation. Dingo abundance and density was estimated as 77 (64–94) individuals and 0.014 (0.012–0.017) dingoes/km²—lower than previously reported estimates—and varied significantly in response to aspects of the fire regime and distance from roads. Our findings highlight the value of integrating environmental covariates and resource-focused sampling strategies to improve detection, population estimates and inference of environmental preferences of large carnivores. Our approach can be adopted elsewhere to help inform management of landscapes and apex predator populations through robust population estimation of low-density carnivore populations in remote area contexts. https://doi.org/10.32942/X2MD3G Physical Sciences and Mathematics camera trap; carnivore; dingo; fire; population estimation; semi-arid; spatial mark–resight (SMR) model Published: 2025-09-11 02:44 Last Updated: 2025-09-11 02:44 CC BY Attribution 4.0 International Data and Code Availability Statement: Open Data Statement: due to the sensitivity of records open data are not available Language: English

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-28T02:00:01.590549+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0