CellCousin2: An Optimized System for Partial Ablation and Tracing of Regenerative Lineages

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-4.0
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

Regeneration can rely on multiple cellular sources, including stem cells, self-duplicating cells, and transdifferentiating cells. A central question in regenerative biology is how these distinct lineages contribute to repair and interact within a functional regenerate. We previously developed the CellCousin system to study hcellular plasticity using inducible recombination and nitroreductase-mediated ablation in zebrafish. Here, we present CellCousin2, which introduces two key improvements for long-term tracking of spared and regenerating cells. First, to reduce background recombination, we developed a Dihydrofolate Reductase (DHFR)-CreER system with dual control: DHFR- mediated degradation in the absence of trimethoprim, and tamoxifen-dependent activation. This combination minimizes leakiness while maintaining high recombination efficiency. Second, we replaced the original nitroreductase with NTR2.0, enabling effective ablation with tenfold lower metronidazole concentration, reducing off-target effects on the liver. Together, these enhancements make CellCousin2 a robust platform for dissecting the dynamics and interactions of regenerative lineages.
Full text 48,720 characters · extracted from preprint-html · click to expand
CellCousin2: An Optimized System for Partial Ablation and Tracing of Regenerative Lineages | bioRxiv /* */ /* */ <!-- <!-- /*! * yepnope1.5.4 * (c) WTFPL, GPLv2 */ (function(a,b,c){function d(a){return"[object Function]"==o.call(a)}function e(a){return"string"==typeof a}function f(){}function g(a){return!a||"loaded"==a||"complete"==a||"uninitialized"==a}function h(){var a=p.shift();q=1,a?a.t?m(function(){("c"==a.t?B.injectCss:B.injectJs)(a.s,0,a.a,a.x,a.e,1)},0):(a(),h()):q=0}function i(a,c,d,e,f,i,j){function k(b){if(!o&&g(l.readyState)&&(u.r=o=1,!q&&h(),l.onload=l.onreadystatechange=null,b)){"img"!=a&&m(function(){t.removeChild(l)},50);for(var d in y[c])y[c].hasOwnProperty(d)&&y[c][d].onload()}}var j=j||B.errorTimeout,l=b.createElement(a),o=0,r=0,u={t:d,s:c,e:f,a:i,x:j};1===y[c]&&(r=1,y[c]=[]),"object"==a?l.data=c:(l.src=c,l.type=a),l.width=l.height="0",l.onerror=l.onload=l.onreadystatechange=function(){k.call(this,r)},p.splice(e,0,u),"img"!=a&&(r||2===y[c]?(t.insertBefore(l,s?null:n),m(k,j)):y[c].push(l))}function j(a,b,c,d,f){return q=0,b=b||"j",e(a)?i("c"==b?v:u,a,b,this.i++,c,d,f):(p.splice(this.i++,0,a),1==p.length&&h()),this}function k(){var a=B;return a.loader={load:j,i:0},a}var l=b.documentElement,m=a.setTimeout,n=b.getElementsByTagName("script")[0],o={}.toString,p=[],q=0,r="MozAppearance"in l.style,s=r&&!!b.createRange().compareNode,t=s?l:n.parentNode,l=a.opera&&"[object Opera]"==o.call(a.opera),l=!!b.attachEvent&&!l,u=r?"object":l?"script":"img",v=l?"script":u,w=Array.isArray||function(a){return"[object Array]"==o.call(a)},x=[],y={},z={timeout:function(a,b){return b.length&&(a.timeout=b[0]),a}},A,B;B=function(a){function b(a){var a=a.split("!"),b=x.length,c=a.pop(),d=a.length,c={url:c,origUrl:c,prefixes:a},e,f,g;for(f=0;f<d;f++)g=a[f].split("="),(e=z[g.shift()])&&(c=e(c,g));for(f=0;f<b;f++)c=x[f](c);return c}function g(a,e,f,g,h){var i=b(a),j=i.autoCallback;i.url.split(".").pop().split("?").shift(),i.bypass||(e&&(e=d(e)?e:e[a]||e[g]||e[a.split("/").pop().split("?")[0]]),i.instead?i.instead(a,e,f,g,h):(y[i.url]?i.noexec=!0:y[i.url]=1,f.load(i.url,i.forceCSS||!i.forceJS&&"css"==i.url.split(".").pop().split("?").shift()?"c":c,i.noexec,i.attrs,i.timeout),(d(e)||d(j))&&f.load(function(){k(),e&&e(i.origUrl,h,g),j&&j(i.origUrl,h,g),y[i.url]=2})))}function h(a,b){function c(a,c){if(a){if(e(a))c||(j=function(){var a=[].slice.call(arguments);k.apply(this,a),l()}),g(a,j,b,0,h);else if(Object(a)===a)for(n in m=function(){var b=0,c;for(c in a)a.hasOwnProperty(c)&&b++;return b}(),a)a.hasOwnProperty(n)&&(!c&&!--m&&(d(j)?j=function(){var a=[].slice.call(arguments);k.apply(this,a),l()}:j[n]=function(a){return function(){var b=[].slice.call(arguments);a&&a.apply(this,b),l()}}(k[n])),g(a[n],j,b,n,h))}else!c&&l()}var h=!!a.test,i=a.load||a.both,j=a.callback||f,k=j,l=a.complete||f,m,n;c(h?a.yep:a.nope,!!i),i&&c(i)}var i,j,l=this.yepnope.loader;if(e(a))g(a,0,l,0);else if(w(a))for(i=0;i (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];var j=d.createElement(s);var dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.src='//www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;j.type='text/javascript';j.async=true;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-M677548'); Skip to main content Home About Submit ALERTS / RSS Search for this keyword Advanced Search New Results CellCousin2: An Optimized System for Partial Ablation and Tracing of Regenerative Lineages View ORCID Profile Gabriel Garnik Hovhannisyan , Tawba Akhourbi , View ORCID Profile Sema Elif Eski , Isabelle Pirson , View ORCID Profile Esteban N. Gurzov , View ORCID Profile Sumeet Pal Singh doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.05.23.655316 Gabriel Garnik Hovhannisyan 1 Institut de Recherche Interdisciplinaire en Biologie Humaine et Moléculaire (IRIBHM-Jacques E. Dumont), Université libre de Bruxelles , Brussels, Belgium 2 Signal Transduction and Metabolism Laboratory, Université libre de Bruxelles , Anderlecht, 1070 Brussels-Capital Region, Belgium Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site ORCID record for Gabriel Garnik Hovhannisyan Tawba Akhourbi 1 Institut de Recherche Interdisciplinaire en Biologie Humaine et Moléculaire (IRIBHM-Jacques E. Dumont), Université libre de Bruxelles , Brussels, Belgium 3 Institut Roger Lambion , Anderlecht, Belgium Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Sema Elif Eski 1 Institut de Recherche Interdisciplinaire en Biologie Humaine et Moléculaire (IRIBHM-Jacques E. Dumont), Université libre de Bruxelles , Brussels, Belgium Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site ORCID record for Sema Elif Eski Isabelle Pirson 1 Institut de Recherche Interdisciplinaire en Biologie Humaine et Moléculaire (IRIBHM-Jacques E. Dumont), Université libre de Bruxelles , Brussels, Belgium Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Esteban N. Gurzov 2 Signal Transduction and Metabolism Laboratory, Université libre de Bruxelles , Anderlecht, 1070 Brussels-Capital Region, Belgium Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site ORCID record for Esteban N. Gurzov For correspondence: esteban.gurzov{at}ulb.be sumeet.pal.singh{at}ulb.be Sumeet Pal Singh 1 Institut de Recherche Interdisciplinaire en Biologie Humaine et Moléculaire (IRIBHM-Jacques E. Dumont), Université libre de Bruxelles , Brussels, Belgium 4 Department of Life Sciences, School of Natural Sciences, Shiv Nadar Institution of Eminence , Delhi, India Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site ORCID record for Sumeet Pal Singh For correspondence: esteban.gurzov{at}ulb.be sumeet.pal.singh{at}ulb.be Abstract Full Text Info/History Metrics Supplementary material Preview PDF Abstract Regeneration can rely on multiple cellular sources, including stem cells, self-duplicating cells, and transdifferentiating cells. A central question in regenerative biology is how these distinct lineages contribute to repair and interact within a functional regenerate. We previously developed the CellCousin system to study hcellular plasticity using inducible recombination and nitroreductase-mediated ablation in zebrafish. Here, we present CellCousin2, which introduces two key improvements for long-term tracking of spared and regenerating cells. First, to reduce background recombination, we developed a Dihydrofolate Reductase (DHFR)-CreER system with dual control: DHFR- mediated degradation in the absence of trimethoprim, and tamoxifen-dependent activation. This combination minimizes leakiness while maintaining high recombination efficiency. Second, we replaced the original nitroreductase with NTR2.0, enabling effective ablation with tenfold lower metronidazole concentration, reducing off-target effects on the liver. Together, these enhancements make CellCousin2 a robust platform for dissecting the dynamics and interactions of regenerative lineages. Introduction A central question in regenerative biology is how distinct cellular lineages contribute to tissue repair and how their interactions shape a functional regenerate. Regeneration can involve multiple sources, including tissue-resident stem cells, self-duplicating differentiated cells, and cells that transdifferentiate from one lineage to another. Lineage tracing has become essential to dissect the relative contributions of these cell types during regeneration and to resolve whether repaired tissue arises from differentiation of stem cells, expansion of spared cells or de novo fate conversion of unrelated lineages. The cellular source of liver regeneration provides an ideal paradigm to explore the contribution of different lineages to tissue repair. In response to mild injury, liver regeneration is primarily driven by proliferation of surviving hepatocytes 1 – 7 . However, in situations of extensive damage or compromised hepatocyte proliferation, cholangiocytes (biliary epithelial cells) can transdifferentiate into hepatocytes 8 – 22 . This facultative regeneration mechanism has been documented in zebrafish 19 – 22 , rodents 12 – 18 , and even in human patients with chronic liver disease 8 – 11 , highlighting the liver as a model to study lineage plasticity during regeneration. To experimentally dissect these lineage dynamics in the liver, we previously developed the CellCousin system in zebrafish ( Fig. 1 ) 23 . This dual-reporter model is based on a Cre-inducible recombination cassette, BB-NTR, which is inspired by the Brainbow strategy 24 . It allows stochastic expression of mutually exclusive fluorescent proteins—mTagBFP2 25 , histone-tagged mGreenLantern 26 (H2B-mGL), or mCherry 27 —under the control of the hepatocyte-specific fabp10a promoter. In one recombination outcome, mCherry is fused to nitroreductase (NTR), resulting in expression of mCherry-NTR in a subset of hepatocytes. These mCherry-NTR– expressing cells can be selectively ablated by metronidazole (Mtz) treatment, while the H2B-mGL–expressing subpopulation is spared ( Fig. 1A ). Following mosaic ablation, the system enables tracking of spared hepatocytes and identification of de novo hepatocytes that arise during regeneration ( Fig. 1B ). Using CellCousin, we demonstrated that liver regeneration in late larval zebrafish involves both self-replication of spared cells and transdifferentiation from cholangiocytes 23 . Download figure Open in new tab Figure 1: The CellCousin system for partial ablation and tracing of regenerating lineages. (A) Schematic overview of the CellCousin zebrafish model, which enables inducible, mosaic expression of Nitroreductase (NTR) in hepatocytes for targeted ablation. Hepatocyte-specific expression is driven by the fabp10a promoter. In the absence of recombination, hepatocytes express nuclear-localized mTagBFP2. Upon 4-hydroxytamoxifen (4-OHT) induction, Cre- mediated recombination results in the stochastic expression of either H2B-mGL (nuclear GFP) or mCherry-NTR fusion protein. Following treatment with Metronidazole (Mtz), only mCherry- NTR–expressing hepatocytes undergo cell death, allowing for controlled, partial ablation within the liver. Created in BioRender. Gurzov, E. (2025) https://BioRender.com/7dii7ih (B) Conceptual model of hepatocyte regeneration following ablation. Two potential regenerative routes are depicted: (1) Self-replication of spared H2B-mGL–expressing hepatocytes, and (2) Transdifferentiation of non-hepatocyte populations, giving rise to de novo hepatocytes that express mTagBFP2. Created in BioRender. Gurzov, E. (2025) https://BioRender.com/7qnxouj However, the utility of the original CellCousin system is constrained by the limitations of tamoxifen-inducible CreER, particularly its background recombination in the absence of tamoxifen 22 . In the zebrafish liver, this leakiness severely compromises temporal control, leading to premature labeling of hepatocytes. In Tg(fabp10a:CreER) , for instance, over 80% of hepatocytes are recombined by 2 months post-fertilization even without induction, as reported by our group and others 22 . Such unintended recombination hinders the ability to distinguish newly generated cells from pre-labeled ones in regeneration studies. Another limitation of the original system is the requirement for high concentrations of metronidazole (Mtz), typically 10 mM, to achieve efficient ablation of NTR-expressing hepatocytes 28 . Prolonged exposure to such concentrations has been shown to cause off-target toxicity, potentially complicating interpretation of regenerative outcomes 29 , 30 . In this study, we present CellCousin2, an improved system for lineage tracing and mosaic ablation in the zebrafish liver. CellCousin2 incorporates two key advances: a chemically stabilized CreER recombinase that minimizes background recombination while retaining high induction efficiency, and the next-generation NTR2.0 enzyme 31 , which enables effective ablation at tenfold lower Mtz concentrations. These enhancements make CellCousin2 a robust and precise platform for dissecting the cellular origins and dynamics of liver regeneration. Results and Discussion To increase the temporal precision and reduce background activity of Cre-mediated recombination in zebrafish hepatocytes, we first generated a modified inducible recombinase construct, Tg(fabp10a:ERCreER) . This construct encodes a fusion of Cre recombinase with two estrogen receptor ligand-binding domains (ER), a strategy previously shown to enhance the stringency of tamoxifen-inducible systems by further restricting nuclear entry in the absence of 4-hydroxytamoxifen (4-OHT) 32 . We tested the recombination efficiency of Tg(fabp10a:ERCreER) in combination with the multicolor reporter line Tg(fabp10a:BB-NTR) , which labels hepatocytes with mutually exclusive fluorescent reporters following Cre activity ( Fig. 1A ). Upon 4-OHT treatment at 4 days post-fertilization (dpf), we observed successful recombination by 10 dpf, resulting in expression of either H2B-mGL or mCherry-NTR in a mosaic pattern, confirming that ERCreER is functional in the zebrafish liver ( Supplementary Fig. 1A ). However, recombination was incomplete: 25.1% ± 4.6% of hepatocytes retained expression of the default mTagBFP2 reporter ( Supplementary Fig. 1B ), indicating that a significant fraction of hepatocytes escaped recombination despite tamoxifen induction. To address the limitations of CreER and ERCreER, we developed a CreER system incorporating a pharmacologically controlled destabilization domain (DD) that promotes proteasomal degradation of the fusion protein under basal conditions 33 , 34 . The DD can be stabilized by a small-molecule, enabling chemical control through dual induction with a stabilizing compound and 4-OHT. We tested this DDCreER construct alongside CreER and ERCreER in the context of the CellCousin model to evaluate recombination efficiency and background leakiness in the zebrafish liver. The DD is a modified version of Escherichia coli ( E. coli ) dihydrofolate reductase (ecDHFR), previously engineered for efficient degradation at 25°C rather than the original 37°C variant 35 , as the higher temperature is incompatible with zebrafish physiology. This low-temperature– sensitive DD was utilized to generate the DDCreER construct, which would be degraded under physiological conditions, thereby reducing background recombination ( Fig. 2A ). In the absence of any inducers, the fusion protein is rapidly degraded and remains inactive. When larvae are treated with trimethoprim (TMP), the DD is stabilized. Under these conditions, the DDCreER protein behaves like CreER, and remains mostly cytoplasmic. Any background recombination is due to limited passive nuclear translocation of the fusion protein. Conversely, treatment with 4-OHT alone permits nuclear translocation, but only of the small fraction of fusion protein that has not yet been degraded. Notably, proteasomal degradation by the 26S proteasome is not immediate 36 , and newly synthesized protein can accumulate briefly, leading to limited recombination. Finally, when both TMP and 4-OHT are present, the stabilized DDCreER protein is able to translocate to the nucleus and induce recombination efficiently ( Fig. 2A ). Download figure Open in new tab Figure 2: The DDCreER system enables tight control of inducible recombination in hepatocytes. (A) Schematic overview of the DDCreER system. In the absence of both 4-hydroxytamoxifen (4-OHT) and trimethoprim (TMP), the destabilizing domain (DD) fused CreER is targeted for proteasomal degradation. Addition of TMP alone stabilizes the DD-fused CreER, resembling the conventional CreER system and potentially allowing background recombination. Addition of 4-OHT alone promotes nuclear translocation of DDCreER, but only of the residual protein that has not yet been degraded, permitting low-level recombination. Only in the presence of both 4-OHT and TMP is DDCreER stabilized and translocated to the nucleus, enabling efficient recombination. Created in BioRender. Gurzov, E. (2025) https://BioRender.com/uteh37g (B) Confocal images of livers from 10 days post-fertilization (dpf) Tg(fabp10a:BB-NTR); Tg(fabp10a:DDCreER) zebrafish larvae following treatment with 172 µM TMP, 10 µM 4-OHT, or both together. DMSO (1%) served as a negative control. Fluorescent markers indicate non-recombined cells (mTagBFP2+), and recombined hepatocytes (H2B-mGL+ or mCherry-NTR+). Scale bar: 50 µm. (C) Quantification of recombination efficiency in Tg(fabp10a:BB-NTR); Tg(fabp10a:DDCreER) larvae under different treatments. Bar plots show the percentage of hepatocytes expressing each fluorescent marker (mTagBFP2, H2B-mGL, or mCherry). Data represents Mean ± SD. Statistical significance was calculated using two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparisons test. (D) Comparison of recombination efficiency between the DDCreER and ERCreER systems, based on the percentage of BFP+ hepatocytes. Bar plots depict Mean ± SD. Statistical significance was assessed using ordinary one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparisons test. Significantly lower proportions of unrecombined (BFP+) cells were observed in DDCreER-expressing livers. We tested the efficiency of the new DDCreER construct by treating 4 dpf Tg(fabp10a:DDCreER) ; Tg(fabp10a:BB-NTR) larvae with either 172 µM TMP, 10 µM 4-OHT or both together, and DMSO as control for 24 hours ( Fig. 2B, C ). Six days later, at 11 dpf, hepatocyte recombination was assessed by confocal microscopy. The DMSO control showed no recombination, confirming that the DDCreER construct exhibits no background activity during early development. TMP alone resulted in a recombination rate of 1.4% ± 1.0%, while 4-OHT alone yielded 9.0% ± 5.2%. The higher recombination observed with 4-OHT alone likely reflects a delay in proteasomal degradation, during which a small amount DDCreER reaches the nucleus and mediates recombination. In contrast, treatment with both 172 µM TMP and 10 µM 4-OHT led to a robust recombination efficiency of 92.8% ± 4.0% ( Fig. 2B, C ). Compared to ERCreER, which showed 25.1% ± 4.6% unrecombined nls-mTagBFP2+ cells, DDCreER achieved significantly higher recombination, with only 7.2% ± 4.0% unrecombined hepatocytes ( Fig. 2D ). Next, to assess background recombination over long time periods, we examined livers from 2-month-old zebrafish expressing Tg(fabp10a:BB-NTR) in combination with either CreER, ERCreER, or DDCreER ( Fig. 3A, B ). Importantly, no 4-OHT treatment was administered in these conditions, allowing us to quantify baseline recombination leakiness. As expected, the Tg(fabp10a:CreER) line showed extensive background recombination, with 80.6% ± 5.4% of hepatocytes labeled. In contrast, Tg(fabp10a:DDCreER) showed markedly reduced background recombination, with only 6.1% ± 7.0% of hepatocytes recombined. Notably, Tg(fabp10a:ERCreER) exhibited negligible background activity, with a recombination rate of 0.0% ± 0.01% ( Fig. 3B ). Download figure Open in new tab Figure 3: Background recombination in the CellCousin model. (A) Confocal images of liver cryosections from 2-month post-fertilization (mpf) Tg(fabp10a:BB-NTR) zebrafish expressing CreER , ERCreER , or DDCreER , without any 4-hydroxytamoxifen (4-OHT) or trimethoprim (TMP) treatment. Fluorescent markers indicate non-recombined nls-mTagBFP2+, or recombined H2B-mGL+ or mCherry-NTR+ hepatocytes. Scale bar: 20 µm. (B) Bar plot representing Mean ± SD showing quantification of background recombination at 2 mpf based on histological analysis of liver sections from Tg(fabp10a:NTR) zebrafish. Significance determined by two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparisons test. (C) Flow cytometry-based quantification of background recombination at 3 mpf in Tg(fabp10a:BB-NTR) zebrafish. The proportion of mTagBFP2+, H2B-mGL+, mCherry+, and double-positive (H2B-mGL+/mCherry+) hepatocytes was measured by FACS. Each dot represents one animal and the bar plots represent Mean ± SD. Statistical analysis performed using two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparisons test. To independently validate these findings, we performed fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) on livers from the same three genotypes at 3 months post-fertilization ( Supplementary Fig. 2A, B ). Consistent with the histological analysis, Tg(fabp10a:CreER) showed a background recombination rate of 88.0% ± 6.1%, whereas Tg(fabp10a:DDCreER) showed a substantially lower rate of 9.7% ± 4.1%. Again, Tg(fabp10a:ERCreER) showed minimal leakiness, with a background recombination rate of 0.3% ± 0.3% ( Fig. 3C ). Having established the high recombination efficiency and low background activity of the DDCreER system, we next attempted to improve the efficiency of hepatocyte ablation. The CellCousin model enables partial ablation by utilizing the codon optimized nitroreductase (NTR) derived from E. coli 37 – 39 . Treatment with 10 mM metronidazole (Mtz) leads to the production of a DNA cross-linking agent in the NTR expressing cells, which induces cell death 28 . However, this high concentration of Mtz is associated with non-negligible off-target effects 29 , 30 , potentially confounding interpretation of regenerative responses. Reducing Mtz exposure would therefore improve the physiological relevance of the system by minimizing unintended toxicity. Recently, an improved nitroreductase, NTR2.0, was isolated from the bacterial species Vibrio vulnificus 31 . NTR2.0 enables efficient ablation at significantly lower Mtz concentrations. To implement this improvement, we replaced the original NTR with NTR2.0 in the BB-NTR cassette, generating the BB-NTR2 construct and transgenic line for hepatocytes. We tested the ablation efficiency of the new Tg(fabp10a:BB-NTR2) line by treating larvae with different concentrations of Mtz ( Fig. 4 ). To induce recombination, Tg(fabp10a:BB-NTR2) ; Tg(fabp10a:DDCreER) larvae were treated at 4 dpf with 172 µM TMP and 10 µM 4-OHT. This resulted in high recombination efficiency, with only 3.8% ± 1.3% unrecombined hepatocytes, compared to 99.9% ± 0.01% in DMSO-treated controls ( Fig. 4A, B, C ). Download figure Open in new tab Figure 4: CellCousin2 enables partial hepatocyte ablation and segregation of spared and de novo hepatocytes. (A) Confocal images of livers from Tg(fabp10a:BB-NTR2); Tg(fabp10a:DDCreER) zebrafish larvae treated with DMSO (control) or recombination-induced using 172 µM trimethoprim (TMP) and 10 µM 4-hydroxytamoxifen (4-OHT) at 4–5 days post-fertilization (dpf). Hepatocyte ablation was performed at 10 dpf using 0.1, 1, or 10 mM metronidazole (Mtz), and livers were imaged at 14 dpf. Scale bars: 50 µm. (B) Bar plots showing quantification of recombination and ablation efficiency in Tg(fabp10a:BB-NTR2); Tg(fabp10a:DDCreER) livers. The proportion of hepatocytes expressing mTagBFP2, H2B-mGL, or mCherry-NTR2 was quantified before ablation (10 dpf) and after ablation (14 dpf) across Mtz concentrations. Data represents Mean ± SD. Significance was assessed using two-way ANOVA followed by Šídák’s multiple comparisons test. (C) Quantification of mTagBFP2+ hepatocytes in the liver as a proxy for unrecombined cells before ablation and newly generated hepatocytes ( de novo ) after ablation. A reduction in mTagBFP2+ cells post-recombination followed by a partial reappearance after Mtz treatment suggests regeneration via transdifferentiation. Bar plots represent Mean ± SD. Statistical significance was calculated using one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparisons test. Following recombination, larvae were treated with 0.1, 1, or 10 mM Mtz for 24 hours at 10 dpf to assess ablation efficiency. At 14 dpf, the 0.1 mM Mtz treatment caused only a modest reduction in the proportion of mCherry-NTR2+ hepatocytes (9.9% ± 2.5%), compared to pre-ablation levels (21.9% ± 5.6% at 10 dpf) ( Fig. 4B ). In contrast, both 1 mM and 10 mM Mtz treatments led to efficient ablation, reducing the mCherry-NTR2+ population to 1.8% ± 1.2% and 1.0% ± 0.7%, respectively ( Fig. 4B ). In both the 0.1 and 1 mM Mtz conditions, we observed a concomitant increase in mTagBFP2+ hepatocytes to 34.6% ± 10.9% and 43.5% ± 11.7%, respectively, suggesting regeneration by de novo cells ( Fig. 4A, C ). These results indicate that 1 mM Mtz is sufficient for effective ablation in the BB-NTR2 line, representing a tenfold reduction in required Mtz concentration relative to the original system. We also noted that ablation with 10 mM Mtz appeared to induce widespread hepatocyte death, potentially due to a bystander effect, in which cytotoxic intermediates generated in dying NTR- expressing cells diffuse into neighboring cells and cause collateral damage 40 , 41 . In this context, de novo mTagBFP2+ hepatocytes comprised 83.5% ± 16.3% of the liver, accompanied by a marked reduction in H2B-mGL+ hepatocytes, which represent the non-NTR-expressing population ( Fig. 4B, C ). We refer to the optimized combination of Tg(fabp10a:BB-NTR2) and Tg(fabp10a:DDCreER) as CellCousin2. We also evaluated whether the ERCreER system could be used with the newly generated Tg(fabp10a:BB-NTR2) line to achieve near-complete recombination efficiency and serve as a viable alternative. In initial experiments Tg(fabp10a:ERCreER) ; Tg(fabp10a:BB-NTR) larvae treated with 10 µM 4-OHT for 24 hours at 4 dpf showed a sub-optimal recombination rate of 74.9% ± 4.6% ( Supplementary Fig. 1B ). To increase this rate, we tested either higher concentrations or repeated dosing of 4-OHT. A single treatment with 20 µM 4-OHT for 24 hours at 4dpf led to a recombination rate of 59.3% ± 3.9%, while a single treatment with 20 µM 4-OHT for 8 hours at 5 dpf led to a survival rate of 40% and a recombination rate of 36.4% ± 8.2% ( Supplementary Fig. 3A, B ). A double treatment, by giving one 10 µM 4-OHT treatment on 4 dpf and a second treatment on 5 dpf, reduced larval survival to 30% and resulted in a recombination rate of only 42.3% ± 7.4% ( Supplementary Fig. 3A, B ). A similar double dose of 20 µM 4-OHT resulted in 100% mortality. Overall, increasing the 4-OHT concentration or dosing frequency seemed to paradoxically decrease recombination efficiency. Higher 4-OHT exposure led to a decrease in hepatocyte number ( Supplementary Fig. 3C ), suggesting that tamoxifen treatment may have toxic effects on the liver. Hepatocyte loss might trigger a regenerative response from non-hepatocytes via transdifferentiation, thereby increasing the proportion of mTagBFP2+ cells. Thus, although the Tg(fabp10a:ERCreER) line exhibits no detectable background recombination ( Fig. 3B, C ), its increased stringency results in sub-optimal recombination in hepatocytes. In conclusion, Tg(fabp10a:DDCreER); Tg(fabp10a:BB-NTR2) , termed as CellCousin2, provides an optimal balance between recombination efficiency and temporal precision, combining low background activity with robust inducibility to enable controlled mosaic labeling and ablation in the zebrafish liver. Our development of CellCousin2 provides a powerful tool for uncovering the cellular logic of liver regeneration. By enabling temporally controlled, low-background lineage labeling and selective ablation using low-toxicity conditions, CellCousin2 makes it possible to track both spared and de novo hepatocytes with high fidelity. These improvements open new opportunities for studying how cell fate decisions are coordinated during organ repair and for investigating regenerative plasticity in other tissues. Beyond the liver, the modular design of CellCousin2 can be readily adapted to other organs or transgenic models, making it a valuable resource for the regeneration and developmental biology communities. Methods Zebrafish lines and husbandry Wild-type and transgenic zebrafish from the outbred AB strain were utilized in all experiments. Zebrafish larvae were kept at 28.5 °C, with ∼50 larvae per 30 ml of E3 medium (5 mM NaCl, 0.17 mM KCl, 0.33 mM CaCl2, 0.33 mM MgSO4, 10 mM HEPES) until 5 days post-fertilization (dpf). At 5 dpf, the larvae were fed daily with rotifers (100 µl/larva/day) and maintained at a density of around 30 larvae per 500 ml of 5 ppt fish water until 10 dpf. Subsequently, they were transferred to tanks with water flow and fed a dry fish flake diet twice daily. All zebrafish husbandry and experimental procedures for transgenic lines were conducted in accordance with institutional (Université Libre de Bruxelles) and national ethical and animal welfare guidelines and regulations, which were approved by the Ethical Committee for Animal Welfare (CEBEA) from the Université Libre de Bruxelles (protocols 864N, 865N, 877N, 881N, 882N). In this study, the following published transgenic lines were used: Tg(fabp10a:creERT2; cryaa:CFP) ulb34 and Tg(fabp10a:lox2272-loxp-nls-mTagBFP2-stop-lox2272-H2B-mGL-stop-loxp-mCherry-NTR; cryaa:mCherry) ulb33 abbreviated as Tg(fabp10a:BB-NTR) 23 . Generation of the Tg(fabp10a:ERCreER) ulb42 , Tg(fabp10a:DDCreER) ulb43 and Tg(fabp10a:BB-NTR2) ulb41 lines The fabp10a:ER T2 CreER T2 ; cryaa:mCerulean construct [abbreviated as fabp10a:ERCreER] was generated by replacing the CreER T2 in fabp10a:CreER T2 ; cryaa:mCerulean construct (Addgene plasmid # 230044 ; http://n2t.net/addgene:230044 ; RRID:Addgene_230044) 23 with ER T2 CreER T2 using EcoRI/NotI. The ER T2 CreER T2 sequence was obtained fom pCAG-ER T2 CreER T2 , which was a gift from Connie Cepko (Addgene plasmid # 13777 ; http://n2t.net/addgene:13777 ; RRID:Addgene_13777) 32 . For the fabp10a:DDCreER T2 ; cryaa:mCerulean construct [abbreviated as fabp10a:DDCreER], the destabilisation domain (DD) sequence was based on a low-temperature–sensitive Escherichia Coli dihydrofolate reductase (ecDHFR) mutant previously described by Cho et al. 35 . This mutant includes multiple point mutations (N23S, V78A, E120G, E134G, E154V, E157G) and enables efficient proteasomal degradation at 25°C. The low-temperature DHFR (ltDHFR) sequence was obtained from pBMN ltDHFR(DD)-YFP plasmid, a gift from Thomas Wandless (Addgene plasmid # 47076 ; http://n2t.net/addgene:47076 ; RRID:Addgene_47076). The sequence was codon optimized for zebrafish using iCodon 42 and fused to the CreER T2 sequence. The dsDNA fragment containing ltDHFR(DD)-CreERT2 , flanked by EcoRI and NotI sites, was synthesized by GenScript Biotech and used to replace CreER T2 in the fabp10a:CreER T2 ; cryaa:mCerulean construct 61 using restriction enzyme based cloning with EcoRI/PacI following by ligation with T4 ligase. To generate the fabp10a:lox2272-loxp-nls-mTagBFP2-stop-lox2272-H2B-mGL-stop-loxp-mCherry-NTR2; cryaa:mCherry construct [abbreviated as fabp10a:BB-NTR2], the dsDNA sequence of BB-NTR2 flanked with EcoRI/PacI was synthesized by GenScript Biotech and used to replace BB-NTR in the fabp10a:BB-NTR; cryaa:mCherry construct (Addgene plasmid #230043 ; http://n2t.net/addgene:230043 ; RRID:Addgene_230043) 23 using restriction enzyme based cloning with EcoRI/PacI followed by ligation with T4 ligase. To generate transgenic lines, a solution containing the 20 ng/µl of the construct was mixed with I-SceI meganuclease enzyme and injected into one-cell stage embryos to facilitate transgenesis. Transgenic founders were identified and maintained using the eye marker expression. Trimethoprim (TMP) and 4-Hydroxytamoxifen (4-OHT) labeling For consistent recombination efficiency across the experiments, appropriate concentration of 4-OHT (MedChemExpress, HY-16950) was prepared from 10 mM stock in 100% DMSO and heated at 65 °C for 10 minutes to activate trans-4-OHT 43 . TMP (Sigma-Aldrich, T7883) stock at 172 µM was prepared by diluting 10 mg of TMP powder and 2 mL 100% DMSO in 200 mL of E3 medium, and put under agitation for 1 hour. All treatments were carried out in the dark at 28.5 °C in 30 ml E3 medium with 30 larvae per petri dish. The labeling experiments were performed under the following treatment conditions: Tg(fabp10a:DDCreER); Tg(fabp10a:BB-NTR) or Tg(fabp10a:DDCreER); Tg(fabp10a:BB-NTR2): First treatment of 172 µM TMP at 4 dpf for 2 hours, followed by 172 µM TMP and 10 µM 4-OHT treatment for 24 hours. Tg(fabp10a:ERCreER); Tg(fabp10a:BB-NTR) : 10 µM 4-OHT treatment at 4 dpf for 24 hours. Tg(fabp10a:ERCreER); Tg(fabp10a:BB-NTR2) : 20 µM 4-OHT treatment at 4 dpf for 24 hours, or 20 µM 4-OHT treatment at 5 dpf for 8 hours, or 10 µM 4-OHT treatment in two separate 12-hour intervals. The first treatment was started at 4 dpf and the second treatment was performed at 5 dpf. In between the two treatments, animals were kept in E3 medium. Genetic partial ablation of hepatocytes For partial ablation experiments, 10 dpf zebrafish larvae were treated with freshly prepared 0.1, 1, or 10 mM metronidazole (Mtz) (Thermo Scientific, #443-48-1) solution in 1% DMSO in E3 medium. The solution was vortexed continuously for 10 minutes to ensure complete dissolution of Mtz. Larvae were exposed for 16-hours by transferring 30 larvae to a 90 mm petri dish containing 30 ml of the Mtz solution, protected from light. A 1% DMSO solution was used as the vehicle for all control animals. After ablation, larvae were rinsed three times with E3 medium and then transferred to tanks with water flow and maintained on a dry food regime. Imaging Before in vivo confocal imaging, larvae were anesthetized with 0.02% tricaine (MS-222) (Sigma-Aldrich, E10521) for 1 minute and then mounted in 1% Low-Melt Agarose (Lonza, 50080) containing 0.02% tricaine. Imaging was performed on a glass-bottomed dish FluoroDish™ (WPI, FD3510-100) using Zeiss LSM 780 confocal microscope platform. Livers were imaged using a 20x/0.8 air or 25x/0.8 water immersion correction lens. The imaging frame was set to 1024 × 1024 pixels. Samples were excited at 405 nm for mTagBFP2, 488 nm for mGreenLantern, and 543 nm for mCherry with fluorescence collected in the respective ranges of 426-479 nm, 497-532 nm, 550-633 nm, and 641-735 nm. For 2 mpf imaging, zebrafish were euthanized in 0.2% Tricaine (MS-222, Sigma E10521) solution. The animals were fixed by immersion in 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) (Thermo, J61899.AK) + 1% Triton X (Sigma, T8787) overnight at 4°C. The animals were washed 2–3 times in PBS to remove PFA before proceeding. The liver were dissected using Dumont #5 forceps (Fine Science Tools 11295-10). The tissue was immersed in 30% sucrose solution overnight at 4°C, embedded in Tissue Freezing Medium (Leica 14020108926) and frozen at −80°C. Thin sections (8 µm) were obtained using cryostat (Leica CM3050 S), collected on frosted glass slides (Thermo Scientific 12362098), and covered with glass coverslip of #1 thickness (Carl Roth GmbH NK79.1) using Fluoromount-G™ mounting medium (Invitrogen, 00-4958-02). Images were taken on Zeiss LSM 780 confocal microscope using 20x/0.8 air lens. Image analysis Image analysis was performed using Imaris 10.2 (Oxford Instruments). The Imaris software was utilized to calculate liver volume by manually selecting liver segments using the ‘surface’ module. Quantifications related to the number of hepatocytes in the CellCousin model were performed by manually thresholding the relevant fluorescent signal (nuclear or cytoplasmic) and separating objects based on intensity. The ‘spots’ module was used with an estimated diameter set to 6 µm for mTagBPF+ and H2B-mGL+ cells (nuclear signal), or 8 µm for mCherry+ (cytoplasmic signal). Statistical analysis Statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism software (version 10.2 GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA). When comparing multiple groups, we used a two-way ANOVA test followed by a multiple comparison test. No data was excluded from analysis. Blinding was not performed during analysis. Data Availability Plasmids generated in this manuscript have been deposited to Addgene: fabp10a:lox2272-loxp-nls-mTagBFP2-stop-lox2272-H2B-mGL-stop-loxp-mCherry-NTR2.0; cryaa:mCherry: Plasmid #230075; fabp10a:ERT2CreERT2; cryaa:mCerulean: Plasmid #230077; fabp10a:ERT2CreERT2; cryaa:mCerulean: Plasmid #230076. Raw images and image analysis files are available upon request to the corresponding author. Author Contributions GGH: investigation, visualization, methodology, writing—original draft, review, and editing. TA, SEE: investigation, methodology and resources. IP: resources. ENG: supervision, methodology, and writing—review and editing. SPS: conceptualization, supervision, funding acquisition, project administration, and writing— original draft, review, and editing. Competing Interests The authors declare no competing interests. Acknowledgements We thank the members of IRIBHM Fish Facility, Christine Dubois from FACS facility, and M Martens and JM Vanderwinden from the Light Microscopy Facility for technical assistance at ULB. ENG is a Research Associate of the Fonds de la Recherche Scientifique (FNRS), Belgium. The work was supported by FNRS grants 40021615 (FRIA) to GGH, 40006730 (ASP) to SEE,, and 40005588 (MISU-PROL), 40013427 (CDR), 40027730 (CDR) and 40020360 (PDR) to SPS, and funding from Université libre de Bruxelles, Jaumotte-Demoulin Foundation, and Ramalingaswami Re-entry Fellowship from Department of Biotechnology (DBT), India to SPS. Funder Information Declared Fonds de la Recherche Scientifique, BE , 40021615 , 40005588 , 40013427 , 40027730 , 40020360 Jaumotte-Demoulin Foundation, BE Department of Biotechnology, https://ror.org/03tjsyq23 , Ramalingaswami Re-entry Fellowship References 1. ↵ Sande-Melon , M. , Bergemann , D. , Fernández-Lajarín , M. , González-Rosa , J. M. & Cox , A. G . Development of a hepatic cryoinjury model to study liver regeneration . Dev. Camb. Engl . 151 , dev203124 ( 2024 ). OpenUrl 2. Lin , S. et al. Distributed hepatocytes expressing telomerase repopulate the liver in homeostasis and injury . Nature 556 , 244 – 248 ( 2018 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 3. Malato , Y. et al. Fate tracing of mature hepatocytes in mouse liver homeostasis and regeneration . J. Clin. Invest . 121 , 4850 – 4860 ( 2011 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 4. Ben-Moshe , S. et al. The spatiotemporal program of zonal liver regeneration following acute injury . Cell Stem Cell 29 , 973 – 989.e10 ( 2022 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 5. Chembazhi , U. V. , Bangru , S. , Hernaez , M. & Kalsotra , A . Cellular plasticity balances the metabolic and proliferation dynamics of a regenerating liver . Genome Res . 31 , 576 – 591 ( 2021 ). OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text 6. Yanger , K. et al. Adult hepatocytes are generated by self-duplication rather than stem cell differentiation . Cell Stem Cell 15 , 340 – 349 ( 2014 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 7. ↵ Font-Burgada , J. et al. Hybrid Periportal Hepatocytes Regenerate the Injured Liver without Giving Rise to Cancer . Cell 162 , 766 – 779 ( 2015 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 8. ↵ Stueck , A. E. & Wanless , I. R . Hepatocyte buds derived from progenitor cells repopulate regions of parenchymal extinction in human cirrhosis . Hepatol. Baltim. Md 61 , 1696 – 1707 ( 2015 ). OpenUrl CrossRef 9. Falkowski , O. et al. Regeneration of hepatocyte ‘buds’ in cirrhosis from intrabiliary stem cells . J. Hepatol . 39 , 357 – 364 ( 2003 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 10. Rodrigo-Torres , D. et al. The biliary epithelium gives rise to liver progenitor cells . Hepatol. Baltim. Md 60 , 1367 – 1377 ( 2014 ). OpenUrl CrossRef 11. ↵ Gribben , C. et al. Acquisition of epithelial plasticity in human chronic liver disease . Nature 630 , 166 – 173 ( 2024 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 12. ↵ Lu , W.-Y. et al. Hepatic progenitor cells of biliary origin with liver repopulation capacity . Nat. Cell Biol . 17 , 971 – 983 ( 2015 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 13. Russell , J. O. et al. Hepatocyte-Specific β-Catenin Deletion During Severe Liver Injury Provokes Cholangiocytes to Differentiate Into Hepatocytes . Hepatol. Baltim. Md 69 , 742 – 759 ( 2019 ). OpenUrl CrossRef 14. Deng , X. et al. Chronic Liver Injury Induces Conversion of Biliary Epithelial Cells into Hepatocytes . Cell Stem Cell 23 , 114 – 122.e3 ( 2018 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 15. Pu , W. et al. Bipotent transitional liver progenitor cells contribute to liver regeneration . Nat. Genet . 55 , 651 – 664 ( 2023 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 16. Manco , R. et al. Reactive cholangiocytes differentiate into proliferative hepatocytes with efficient DNA repair in mice with chronic liver injury . J. Hepatol . 70 , 1180 – 1191 ( 2019 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 17. Raven , A. et al. Cholangiocytes act as facultative liver stem cells during impaired hepatocyte regeneration . Nature 547 , 350 – 354 ( 2017 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 18. ↵ Alison , M. , Golding , M. , Sarraf , C. , Edwards , R. & Lalani , E . Liver damage in the rat induces hepatocyte stem cells from biliary epithelial cells . Gastroenterology 110 , 1182 – 1190 ( 1996 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 19. ↵ Oderberg , I. M. & Goessling , W. Biliary epithelial cells are facultative liver stem cells during liver regeneration in adult zebrafish . JCI Insight 8 , e163929 ( 2023 ). OpenUrl CrossRef 20. Choi , T.-Y. , Ninov , N. , Stainier , D. Y. R. & Shin , D . Extensive conversion of hepatic biliary epithelial cells to hepatocytes after near total loss of hepatocytes in zebrafish . Gastroenterology 146 , 776 – 788 ( 2014 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 21. He , J. , Lu , H. , Zou , Q. & Luo , L . Regeneration of liver after extreme hepatocyte loss occurs mainly via biliary transdifferentiation in zebrafish . Gastroenterology 146 , 789 – 800.e8 ( 2014 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 22. ↵ Zhang , W. et al. Contributions of biliary epithelial cells to hepatocyte homeostasis and regeneration in zebrafish . iScience 24 , 102142 ( 2021 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 23. ↵ Eski , S. E. et al. Cholangiocytes contribute to hepatocyte regeneration after partial liver injury during growth spurt in zebrafish . 2025.01.09.629100 Preprint at doi: 10.1101/2025.01.09.629100 ( 2025 ). OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text 24. ↵ Livet , J. et al. Transgenic strategies for combinatorial expression of fluorescent proteins in the nervous system . Nature 450 , 56 – 62 ( 2007 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 25. ↵ Subach , O. M. , Cranfill , P. J. , Davidson , M. W. & Verkhusha , V. V . An Enhanced Monomeric Blue Fluorescent Protein with the High Chemical Stability of the Chromophore . PLOS ONE 6 , e28674 ( 2011 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 26. ↵ Campbell , B. C. et al. mGreenLantern: a bright monomeric fluorescent protein with rapid expression and cell filling properties for neuronal imaging . Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci . 117 , 30710 – 30721 ( 2020 ). OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text 27. ↵ Shaner , N. C. et al. Improved monomeric red, orange and yellow fluorescent proteins derived from Discosoma sp. red fluorescent protein . Nat. Biotechnol . 22 , 1567 – 1572 ( 2004 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 28. ↵ Curado , S. , Stainier , D. Y. R. & Anderson , R. M . Nitroreductase-mediated cell/tissue ablation in zebrafish: a spatially and temporally controlled ablation method with applications in developmental and regeneration studies . Nat. Protoc . 3 , 948 – 954 ( 2008 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 29. ↵ Chen , Y. et al. Ronidazole Is a Superior Prodrug to Metronidazole for Nitroreductase-Mediated Hepatocytes Ablation in Zebrafish Larvae . Zebrafish 20 , 95 – 102 ( 2023 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 30. ↵ Cheng , X. et al. Effects of metronidazole on proopiomelanocortin a gene expression in zebrafish . Gen. Comp. Endocrinol . 214 , 87 – 94 ( 2015 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 31. ↵ Sharrock , A. V. et al. NTR 2.0: a rationally engineered prodrug-converting enzyme with substantially enhanced efficacy for targeted cell ablation . Nat. Methods 19 , 205 – 215 ( 2022 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 32. ↵ Matsuda , T. & Cepko , C. L . Controlled expression of transgenes introduced by in vivo electroporation . Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A . 104 , 1027 – 1032 ( 2007 ). OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text 33. ↵ Iwamoto , M. , Björklund , T. , Lundberg , C. , Kirik , D. & Wandless , T. J . A General Chemical Method to Regulate Protein Stability in the Mammalian Central Nervous System . Chem. Biol . 17 , 981 – 988 ( 2010 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 34. ↵ Sando , R. et al. Inducible control of gene expression with destabilized Cre . Nat. Methods 10 , 1085 – 1088 ( 2013 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 35. ↵ Cho , U. et al. Rapid and Tunable Control of Protein Stability in Caenorhabditis elegans Using a Small Molecule . PLoS ONE 8 , e72393 ( 2013 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 36. ↵ Thrower , J. S. , Hoffman , L. , Rechsteiner , M. & Pickart , C. M . Recognition of the polyubiquitin proteolytic signal . EMBO J . 19 , 94 – 102 ( 2000 ). OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text 37. ↵ Grohmann , M. et al. A mammalianized synthetic nitroreductase gene for high-level expression . BMC Cancer 9 , 301 ( 2009 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 38. Singh , S. P. , Holdway , J. E. & Poss , K. D . Regeneration of Amputated Zebrafish Fin Rays from De Novo Osteoblasts . Dev. Cell 22 , 879 – 886 ( 2012 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 39. ↵ Drabek , D. , Guy , J. , Craig , R. & Grosveld , F . The expression of bacterial nitroreductase in transgenic mice results in specific cell killing by the prodrug CB1954 . Gene Ther . 4 , 93 – 100 ( 1997 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 40. ↵ Helsby , N. A. , Ferry , D. M. , Patterson , A. V. , Pullen , S. M. & Wilson , W. R . 2-Amino metabolites are key mediators of CB 1954 and SN 23862 bystander effects in nitroreductase GDEPT . Br. J. Cancer 90 , 1084 – 1092 ( 2004 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 41. ↵ Bridgewater , J. A. , Knox , R. J. , Pitts , J. D. , Collins , M. K. & Springer , C. J . The bystander effect of the nitroreductase/CB1954 enzyme/prodrug system is due to a cell-permeable metabolite . Hum. Gene Ther . 8 , 709 – 717 ( 1997 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 42. ↵ Diez , M. et al. iCodon customizes gene expression based on the codon composition . Sci. Rep . 12 , 12126 ( 2022 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 43. ↵ Felker , A. et al. In vivo performance and properties of Tamoxifen metabolites for CreERT2 control . PLoS ONE 11 , e0152989 ( 2016 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed View the discussion thread. Back to top Previous Next Posted May 28, 2025. Download PDF Supplementary Material Email Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv. NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article. Your Email * Your Name * Send To * Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas. You are going to email the following CellCousin2: An Optimized System for Partial Ablation and Tracing of Regenerative Lineages Message Subject (Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv Message Body (Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website. Your Personal Message CAPTCHA This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions. Share CellCousin2: An Optimized System for Partial Ablation and Tracing of Regenerative Lineages Gabriel Garnik Hovhannisyan , Tawba Akhourbi , Sema Elif Eski , Isabelle Pirson , Esteban N. Gurzov , Sumeet Pal Singh bioRxiv 2025.05.23.655316; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.05.23.655316 Share This Article: Copy Citation Tools CellCousin2: An Optimized System for Partial Ablation and Tracing of Regenerative Lineages Gabriel Garnik Hovhannisyan , Tawba Akhourbi , Sema Elif Eski , Isabelle Pirson , Esteban N. Gurzov , Sumeet Pal Singh bioRxiv 2025.05.23.655316; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.05.23.655316 Citation Manager Formats BibTeX Bookends EasyBib EndNote (tagged) EndNote 8 (xml) Medlars Mendeley Papers RefWorks Tagged Ref Manager RIS Zotero Tweet Widget Facebook Like Google Plus One Subject Area Developmental Biology Subject Areas All Articles Animal Behavior and Cognition (7618) Biochemistry (17637) Bioengineering (13864) Bioinformatics (41853) Biophysics (21403) Cancer Biology (18540) Cell Biology (25429) Clinical Trials (138) Developmental Biology (13356) Ecology (19862) Epidemiology (2067) Evolutionary Biology (24287) Genetics (15585) Genomics (22464) Immunology (17701) Microbiology (40300) Molecular Biology (17142) Neuroscience (88440) Paleontology (666) Pathology (2825) Pharmacology and Toxicology (4814) Physiology (7633) Plant Biology (15107) Scientific Communication and Education (2042) Synthetic Biology (4285) Systems Biology (9809) Zoology (2268)

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: preprint-html

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-28T02:00:01.590549+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0