Comparative study of bacterial SPOR domains identifies functionally important differences in glycan binding affinity

preprint OA: closed
📄 Open PDF View at publisher

Abstract

Bacterial SPOR domains target proteins to the divisome by binding septal peptidoglycan (PG) at sites where cell wall amidases have removed stem peptides. These PG structures are referred to as denuded glycans. Although all characterized SPOR domains bind denuded glycans, whether there are differences in affinity is not known. Here we use isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC) to determine the relative PG glycan binding affinity ( K d) of four Escherichia coli SPOR domains and one Cytophaga hutchinsonii SPOR domain. We found that the K d values ranged from approximately 1 µM for E. coli DamX SPOR and C. hutchinsonii CHU2221 SPOR to about 10 µM for E. coli FtsN SPOR . To ask whether these differences in PG binding affinity are important for SPOR domain protein function, we constructed and characterized a set of DamX and FtsN “swap” proteins. As expected, all SPOR domain swap proteins localized to the division site, and in the case of FtsN all of the heterologous SPOR domains supported cell division. But for DamX only the high-affinity SPOR domain from CHU2221 supported normal function in cell division. In summary, different SPOR domains bind denuded PG glycans with different affinity, which appears to be very important for the function of some SPOR domain proteins (e.g., DamX) but not others (e.g., FtsN). Importance SPOR domain proteins are prominent components of the cell division apparatus in a wide variety of bacteria. The primary function of SPOR domains is to target proteins to the division site, which they accomplish by binding to septal peptidoglycan. But whether SPOR domains have any functions beyond septal targeting is unknown. Here we show that SPOR domains vary in their PG binding affinities and, at least in the case of the E. coli cell division protein DamX, having a high-affinity SPOR domain contributes to proper function.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Citation neighborhood (sparse)

Too few in-corpus citations on either side for a chart; here are the lists.

Cites (1)

References (60)

Source provenance

crossref
last seen: 2026-05-21T01:00:09.368814+00:00
europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-19T01:45:01.086888+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-06-13T06:42:57.164913+00:00