Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Stem Cell Therapy in Myocardial Infarction: Effects on Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction and Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events

preprint OA: closed
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

Introduction Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide, often progressing to heart failure (HF) despite advances in treatment. Stem cell therapy has emerged as a promising approach to repair myocardial tissue, improve cardiac function, and reduce the progression to HF. However, the long-term efficacy and clinical outcomes remain uncertain. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the mid-to long-term effects of stem cell therapy on left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), infarct size, and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in AMI patients. Methods A comprehensive search was conducted across PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and CENTRAL databases, up to August 2025, following PRISMA guidelines. The study included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that assessed the effects of stem cell therapy on LVEF and MACE. Data extraction was performed independently by two reviewers, and risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane’s Risk of Bias 2.0 tool. Statistical analyses were performed using Stata 18.0, with heterogeneity quantified using I², and publication bias assessed through funnel plots. Results A total of 83 studies involving 7307 patients were included in the analysis. The average age of the patients was 55.29 ± 12 years, with a follow-up duration of 27.5 days. Significant improvements in LVEF were observed at various time points: 1.83% at 6 months, 2.21% at 12 months, and 2.21% at 24 months. The highest mean difference in LVEF was observed in Wang et al. (2014) with a mean difference (MD) of 17.60%, while the lowest was −4.20% in Wohrle et al. (2010). MACE analysis showed a favorable trend at 6 months with an odds ratio of −0.89 (95% CI: −1.14; −0.63), but no significant improvement at 12, 24, or 36 months. A reduction in infarct size was noted at 6 months (MD: 1.80%, 95% CI: 0.58; 3.02), but this was minimal at 12 months (MD: 0.70%, 95% CI: 0.48; 0.91). Conclusion Stem cell therapy shows promise for improving LVEF and reducing infarct size in the short to mid-term after AMI. However, long-term benefits remain inconclusive, with minimal effects observed at 24 and 36 months. Further studies are required to determine the optimal timing, dosage, and stem cell source to maximize therapeutic efficacy. Additionally, the use of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) as a primary endpoint may provide a more comprehensive assessment of the long-term impact of stem cell therapy in AMI patients.
Full text 3,880 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 4 sections · click to expand

Abstract

Introduction Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide, often progressing to heart failure (HF) despite advances in treatment. Stem cell therapy has emerged as a promising approach to repair myocardial tissue, improve cardiac function, and reduce the progression to HF. However, the long-term efficacy and clinical outcomes remain uncertain. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the mid-to long-term effects of stem cell therapy on left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), infarct size, and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in AMI patients.

Methods

A comprehensive search was conducted across PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and CENTRAL databases, up to August 2025, following PRISMA guidelines. The study included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that assessed the effects of stem cell therapy on LVEF and MACE. Data extraction was performed independently by two reviewers, and risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane’s Risk of Bias 2.0 tool. Statistical analyses were performed using Stata 18.0, with heterogeneity quantified using I², and publication bias assessed through funnel plots.

Results

A total of 83 studies involving 7307 patients were included in the analysis. The average age of the patients was 55.29 ± 12 years, with a follow-up duration of 27.5 days. Significant improvements in LVEF were observed at various time points: 1.83% at 6 months, 2.21% at 12 months, and 2.21% at 24 months. The highest mean difference in LVEF was observed in Wang et al. (2014) with a mean difference (MD) of 17.60%, while the lowest was −4.20% in Wohrle et al. (2010). MACE analysis showed a favorable trend at 6 months with an odds ratio of −0.89 (95% CI: −1.14; −0.63), but no significant improvement at 12, 24, or 36 months. A reduction in infarct size was noted at 6 months (MD: 1.80%, 95% CI: 0.58; 3.02), but this was minimal at 12 months (MD: 0.70%, 95% CI: 0.48; 0.91).

Conclusion

Stem cell therapy shows promise for improving LVEF and reducing infarct size in the short to mid-term after AMI. However, long-term benefits remain inconclusive, with minimal effects observed at 24 and 36 months. Further studies are required to determine the optimal timing, dosage, and stem cell source to maximize therapeutic efficacy. Additionally, the use of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) as a primary endpoint may provide a more comprehensive assessment of the long-term impact of stem cell therapy in AMI patients. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest. Clinical Protocols https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD420251133608 Funding Statement None Author Declarations I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained. Yes I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals. Yes I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance). Yes I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable. Yes Data Availability Supplementary file

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-06-13T06:42:57.164913+00:00