Policy Pathways for Enabling Mussel Shell Reuse in Marine Restoration in Chile

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-4.0

Abstract

Chile is the world’s second-largest producer of mussels and the leading exporter, harvesting approximately 400,000 t/year, of which about 30% becomes shell waste. While this biomaterial poses a growing disposal challenge, it also represents an opportunity for marine ecological restoration. In southern Chile, where mussel farming is concentrated, efforts to reuse shells as nature-based solutions (NbS) face legal and institutional constraints. This study examines the regulatory conditions shaping shell reuse through analysis of national, regional, and local legal and policy instruments, complemented by a participatory workshop with 50 stakeholders. Instruments were assessed across six policy domains and coded by legal function (enabling, restrictive, or ambiguous) and regulatory effects, identifying hard barriers, contextual friction, and underutilized enabling levers. Results show that although current regulations—particularly the classification of shells as waste—formally restrict marine reuse, key constraints extend beyond explicit prohibitions. Interpretive ambiguity, procedural uncertainty, and fragmented institutional mandates play a central role in limiting restoration initiatives. Workshop insights suggest that overcoming these barriers does not require comprehensive legal reform, but can be achieved through reinterpretation of existing rules, technical standard-setting, and improved inter-agency coordination, supported by pilot projects with strong legitimacy. These findings highlight that shell reuse is not only a legal and technical challenge, but also a cultural and ethical one, requiring approaches that integrate ecological goals with social legitimacy and community participation. The Chilean case illustrates how regulatory innovation can emerge within existing legal systems, offering transferable insights for advancing circular NbS in coastal governance contexts.
Full text 2,836 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 1 of this Preprint. You must log in to post a comment. There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article. This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 1 of this Preprint. Add a Comment You must log in to post a comment. Comments There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article. Chile is the world’s second-largest producer of mussels and the leading exporter, harvesting approximately 400,000 t/year, of which about 30% becomes shell waste. While this biomaterial poses a growing disposal challenge, it also represents an opportunity for marine ecological restoration. In southern Chile, where mussel farming is concentrated, efforts to reuse shells as nature-based solutions (NbS) face legal and institutional constraints. This study examines the regulatory conditions shaping shell reuse through analysis of national, regional, and local legal and policy instruments, complemented by a participatory workshop with 50 stakeholders. Instruments were assessed across six policy domains and coded by legal function (enabling, restrictive, or ambiguous) and regulatory effects, identifying hard barriers, contextual friction, and underutilized enabling levers. Results show that although current regulations—particularly the classification of shells as waste—formally restrict marine reuse, key constraints extend beyond explicit prohibitions. Interpretive ambiguity, procedural uncertainty, and fragmented institutional mandates play a central role in limiting restoration initiatives. Workshop insights suggest that overcoming these barriers does not require comprehensive legal reform, but can be achieved through reinterpretation of existing rules, technical standard-setting, and improved inter-agency coordination, supported by pilot projects with strong legitimacy. These findings highlight that shell reuse is not only a legal and technical challenge, but also a cultural and ethical one, requiring approaches that integrate ecological goals with social legitimacy and community participation. The Chilean case illustrates how regulatory innovation can emerge within existing legal systems, offering transferable insights for advancing circular NbS in coastal governance contexts. https://doi.org/10.32942/X2WW92 Environmental Law, Environmental Sciences, Life Sciences marine restoration, mytiliculture, aquaculture, environmental policy, governance, circular economy, shell waste Published: 2026-04-02 09:04 Last Updated: 2026-04-02 09:04 CC BY Attribution 4.0 International Data and Code Availability Statement: The data supporting this study consist of a structured review of regulatory documents and will be made available as supplementary material upon publication Language: English

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-28T02:00:01.590549+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0