A new method of quantifying endometriosis using digital photography

In: Gynecological Surgery · 2005 · vol. 2(2) , pp. 119–125 · doi:10.1007/s10397-005-0095-7 · W1984651383
article OA: closed CC0
Limited metadata. Only one source feed has indexed this record so far — no abstract, full text, or open-access copy is available through Endo Lab. The publisher's page (linked below) is the canonical location for the actual content. If you have institutional access, use "Find at my library".
View at publisher → View on OpenAlex
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06+body, 2026-06-10

This study developed and tested a digital photography method to quantify endometriosis lesion surface area, finding good intra-observer reproducibility but poor inter-observer agreement.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-10

This three-centre pilot study used laparoscopy in six adults with suspected or known endometriosis to quantify an “index” peritoneal lesion by taking close-up and wide-angle digital photographs alongside a needle for scale, then computing lesion surface area using specialized computer analysis and mapping the rAFS-defined red, black, and white components. Two gynaecologists independently analyzed randomized image sets, and the authors found good intra-observer reproducibility, while inter-observer variability was poorer, with assessor 1 showing less within-subject variation than assessor 2, likely related to differences in tracing technique. Lesion components varied widely across subjects (including lesions composed only of red tissue in three patients), and the paper cautions that small assessment numbers and interpretation issues with coefficient of variation can affect reproducibility conclusions. This paper is centrally about endometriosis — it introduces a digital photography and image-analysis method to more precisely quantify peritoneal endometriotic lesion surface area and its rAFS components.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Condition tags

endometriosis

Citation neighborhood (sparse)

Too few in-corpus citations on either side for a chart; here are the lists.

Cites (3)

References (6)

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-06-13T06:42:57.164913+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK