Quantifying Pathway Identifiability under Partial Metabolomics for Measurement Prioritization

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-4.0
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher
AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-05 · read from full text

The paper studies how to quantify pathway identifiability and guide measurement prioritization when metabolomics data are incomplete and only partially cover metabolites. The author proposes an operator-based framework that aligns condition-specific pathway graphs using a Johnson-Lindenstrauss stabilized fused Gromov-Wasserstein approach that integrates pathway topology with heterogeneous metabolite features, then quantifies pathway ambiguity via a composite underdetermination functional (transport entropy, alignment instability, and structural risk). Measurement prioritization is posed as an optimization over the sensitivity of this ambiguity functional to estimate “next-best” metabolite selections without enumerating latent pathway completions. Under synthetic masking the method shows low regret versus mechanistic and heuristic baselines, and runtime is tractable for curated and moderate genome-scale models, with the stated limitation that the work is a preprint and not peer reviewed. This paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Abstract Motivation: Incomplete metabolite coverage is a persistent limitation in pathway-level analysis. Under partial metabolomics, multiple pathway configurations may be consistent with the same observed measurements, leading to structural ambiguity in biological interpretation. Existing approaches typically rely on imputation or enrichment scoring but do not explicitly quantify pathway identifiability or guide measurement prioritization. Results: We introduce a unified operator-based framework for pathway identifiability under partial metabolomics. Condition-specific pathway graphs are aligned using a Johnson-Lindenstrauss stabilized fused Gromov-Wasserstein (JL-FGW) operator, integrating topology and metabolite features under het- erogeneous coverage. Pathway ambiguity is quantified through a composite underdetermination functional combining transport entropy, alignment instability, and structural risk. Measurement prioritization is formulated as an optimization problem over the sensitivity of this functional, yielding a computable estimator for next-best metabolite selection without enumerating latent pathway completions. Rather than proposing another generic pathway scoring method, we address a different decision problem: under incomplete metabolite observation, which additional measurements are expected to maximally reduce pathway-level uncertainty? Under synthetic masking, the framework achieves low regret relative to mechanistic and heuristic measurement-selection baselines. In real metabolomics cohorts, pathway coverage is highly dataset-dependent, and the framework identifies a compact set of pathways for which recommendation-based identifiability benchmarking is feasible. Sensitivity analysis indicates stable ranking under moderate perturbations of composite weights, and runtime analysis confirms tractability for curated pathways and moderate genome-scale models. Availability: Code and synthetic evaluation scripts are available for peer review and will be publicly released upon publication.
Full text 11,022 characters · extracted from preprint-html · click to expand
Quantifying Pathway Identifiability under Partial Metabolomics for Measurement Prioritization | Research Square window.SnipcartSettings = { analytics: { enabled: false } }; (function() { var accessVector = localStorage.getItem('access_vector') || ''; window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; if (accessVector) { window.dataLayer.push({ user: { profile: { profileInfo: { snid: accessVector } } } }); } })(); (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src='https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-K279D39R'); Browse Preprints In Review Journals COVID-19 Preprints AJE Video Bytes Research Tools Research Promotion AJE Professional Editing AJE Rubriq About Preprint Platform In Review Editorial Policies Our Team Advisory Board Help Center Sign In Submit a Preprint Cite Share Download PDF Research Article Quantifying Pathway Identifiability under Partial Metabolomics for Measurement Prioritization Anas Enoch This is a preprint; it has not been peer reviewed by a journal. https://doi.org/ 10.21203/rs.3.rs-9084589/v1 This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Abstract Motivation: Incomplete metabolite coverage is a persistent limitation in pathway-level analysis. Under partial metabolomics, multiple pathway configurations may be consistent with the same observed measurements, leading to structural ambiguity in biological interpretation. Existing approaches typically rely on imputation or enrichment scoring but do not explicitly quantify pathway identifiability or guide measurement prioritization. Results: We introduce a unified operator-based framework for pathway identifiability under partial metabolomics. Condition-specific pathway graphs are aligned using a Johnson-Lindenstrauss stabilized fused Gromov-Wasserstein (JL-FGW) operator, integrating topology and metabolite features under het- erogeneous coverage. Pathway ambiguity is quantified through a composite underdetermination functional combining transport entropy, alignment instability, and structural risk. Measurement prioritization is formulated as an optimization problem over the sensitivity of this functional, yielding a computable estimator for next-best metabolite selection without enumerating latent pathway completions. Rather than proposing another generic pathway scoring method, we address a different decision problem: under incomplete metabolite observation, which additional measurements are expected to maximally reduce pathway-level uncertainty? Under synthetic masking, the framework achieves low regret relative to mechanistic and heuristic measurement-selection baselines. In real metabolomics cohorts, pathway coverage is highly dataset-dependent, and the framework identifies a compact set of pathways for which recommendation-based identifiability benchmarking is feasible. Sensitivity analysis indicates stable ranking under moderate perturbations of composite weights, and runtime analysis confirms tractability for curated pathways and moderate genome-scale models. Availability: Code and synthetic evaluation scripts are available for peer review and will be publicly released upon publication. Full Text Additional Declarations No competing interests reported. Cite Share Download PDF Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Research Square lets you share your work early, gain feedback from the community, and start making changes to your manuscript prior to peer review in a journal. As a division of Research Square Company, we’re committed to making research communication faster, fairer, and more useful. We do this by developing innovative software and high quality services for the global research community. Our growing team is made up of researchers and industry professionals working together to solve the most critical problems facing scientific publishing. Also discoverable on Platform About Our Team In Review Editorial Policies Advisory Board Help Center Resources Author Services Accessibility API Access RSS feed Manage Cookie Preferences © Research Square 2026 | ISSN 2693-5015 (online) Privacy Policy Terms of Service Do Not Sell My Personal Information {"props":{"pageProps":{"initialData":{"identity":"rs-9084589","acceptedTermsAndConditions":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"archivedVersions":[],"articleType":"Research Article","associatedPublications":[],"authors":[{"id":604534229,"identity":"06d808a2-053b-42b5-858a-915418ee2379","order_by":0,"name":"Anas Enoch","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Université Mohammed VI des Sciences de la Santé","correspondingAuthor":true,"prefix":"","firstName":"Anas","middleName":"","lastName":"Enoch","suffix":""}],"badges":[],"createdAt":"2026-03-10 13:25:37","currentVersionCode":1,"declarations":"","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-9084589/v1","doiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-9084589/v1","draftVersion":[],"editorialEvents":[],"editorialNote":"","failedWorkflow":false,"files":[{"id":107699086,"identity":"5ed6c9f9-6b75-4be8-bf59-bb426134193a","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2026-04-24 07:42:06","extension":"pdf","order_by":1,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"manuscript-pdf","size":1797381,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"Pathwaysidentifiability.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-9084589/v1_covered_42b3ed82-22ce-45a8-9cd7-0d0db51c64a7.pdf"}],"financialInterests":"No competing interests reported.","formattedTitle":"Quantifying Pathway Identifiability under Partial Metabolomics for Measurement Prioritization","fulltext":[],"fulltextSource":"","fullText":"","funders":[],"hasAdminPriorityOnWorkflow":false,"hasManuscriptDocX":false,"hasOptedInToPreprint":true,"hasPassedJournalQc":"","hasAnyPriority":false,"hideJournal":true,"highlight":"","institution":"","isAcceptedByJournal":false,"isAuthorSuppliedPdf":true,"isDeskRejected":"","isHiddenFromSearch":false,"isInQc":false,"isInWorkflow":false,"isPdf":true,"isPdfUpToDate":true,"isWithdrawnOrRetracted":false,"journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true},"keywords":"","lastPublishedDoi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-9084589/v1","lastPublishedDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-9084589/v1","license":{"name":"CC BY 4.0","url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"manuscriptAbstract":"\u003cp\u003eMotivation: Incomplete metabolite coverage is a persistent limitation in pathway-level analysis. Under partial metabolomics, multiple pathway configurations may be consistent with the same observed measurements, leading to structural ambiguity in biological interpretation. Existing approaches typically rely on imputation or enrichment scoring but do not explicitly quantify pathway identifiability or guide measurement prioritization.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eResults: We introduce a unified operator-based framework for pathway identifiability under partial metabolomics. Condition-specific pathway graphs are aligned using a Johnson-Lindenstrauss stabilized fused Gromov-Wasserstein (JL-FGW) operator, integrating topology and metabolite features under het- erogeneous coverage. Pathway ambiguity is quantified through a composite underdetermination functional combining transport entropy, alignment instability, and structural risk. Measurement prioritization is formulated as an optimization problem over the sensitivity of this functional, yielding a computable estimator for next-best metabolite selection without enumerating latent pathway completions. Rather than proposing another generic pathway scoring method, we address a different decision problem: under incomplete metabolite observation, which additional measurements are expected to maximally reduce pathway-level uncertainty? Under synthetic masking, the framework achieves low regret relative to mechanistic and heuristic measurement-selection baselines. In real metabolomics cohorts, pathway coverage is highly dataset-dependent, and the framework identifies a compact set of pathways for which recommendation-based identifiability benchmarking is feasible. Sensitivity analysis indicates stable ranking under moderate perturbations of composite weights, and runtime analysis confirms tractability for curated pathways and moderate genome-scale models.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAvailability: Code and synthetic evaluation scripts are available for peer review and will be publicly released upon publication.\u003c/p\u003e","manuscriptTitle":"Quantifying Pathway Identifiability under Partial Metabolomics for Measurement Prioritization","msid":"","msnumber":"","nonDraftVersions":[{"code":1,"date":"2026-03-13 21:09:16","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-9084589/v1","editorialEvents":[{"type":"communityComments","content":0}],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true}}],"origin":"","ownerIdentity":"95f09f5a-b6db-415b-93f4-1e82f570a0a8","owner":[],"postedDate":"March 13th, 2026","published":true,"recentEditorialEvents":[],"rejectedJournal":[],"revision":"","amendment":"","status":"posted","subjectAreas":[],"tags":[],"updatedAt":"2026-04-24T07:40:49+00:00","versionOfRecord":[],"versionCreatedAt":"2026-03-13 21:09:16","video":"","vorDoi":"","vorDoiUrl":"","workflowStages":[]},"version":"v1","identity":"rs-9084589","journalConfig":"researchsquare"},"__N_SSP":true},"page":"/article/[identity]/[[...version]]","query":{"redirect":"/article/rs-9084589","identity":"rs-9084589","version":["v1"]},"buildId":"XKTyCvWXoU3ODBz1xrDgd","isFallback":false,"isExperimentalCompile":false,"dynamicIds":[84888],"gssp":true,"scriptLoader":[]}

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: preprint-html

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-28T02:00:01.590549+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0