Abstract
As digital health technologies and media habits evolve, health communication campaigns must adapt to remain effective, equitable, and credible. This paper reviews research on core characteristics of successful campaigns, evidence-based design, audience-centered messaging, multi-channel delivery, and ongoing evaluation, and provides recommendations for campaign development over the next decade. The review highlights how cultural context shapes health behaviours and how culturally relevant language, symbols, and narratives can improve engagement and impact. It also examines the role of gender norms, with emphasis on masculinity ideals that can either hinder or support health-seeking behaviour and illustrates these dynamics through examples from mental health and smoking cessation campaigns. Recommendations include integrating emerging tools (e.g., mobile health apps, telehealth, social media partnerships, influencer strategies) with traditional channels to reach diverse populations, especially rural and underserved groups. The paper further addresses challenges posed by misinformation and unequal access, arguing for iterative improvement using community input, social listening, and platform analytics. Future campaigns will be most effective when they combine technological innovation with cultural sensitivity and adaptive evaluation.
Full text
621 characters
· extracted from
oa-doi-fallback
· click to expand
There is a newer version available for this {{ publicationType }}. View latest version
{{ publication.field_name }}
{{ publication.subfield_name }}
Copyright: © {{ publicationYear }} {{ publication.presentation_authors[0].full_name + (publication.presentation_authors.length > 1 ? ' et al' : '') }}. This is an open access publication distributed under the terms of the CC BY 4.0 License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Check the {{ publicationType | capitalize }} Source for copyright and license information.
Listen on
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
(via DOI)
is the canonical version.