Bacillus Pumilus Induced Tolerance of Maize (Zea Mays L.) Against Cadmium (Cd) Stress

Bacillus Pumilus Induced Tolerance of Maize (Zea Mays L.) Against Cadmium (Cd) Stress | Research Square window.SnipcartSettings = { analytics: { enabled: false } }; (function() { var accessVector = localStorage.getItem('access_vector') || ''; window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; if (accessVector) { window.dataLayer.push({ user: { profile: { profileInfo: { snid: accessVector } } } }); } })(); (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src='https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-K279D39R'); Browse Preprints In Review Journals COVID-19 Preprints AJE Video Bytes Research Tools Research Promotion AJE Professional Editing AJE Rubriq About Preprint Platform In Review Editorial Policies Our Team Advisory Board Help Center Sign In Submit a Preprint Cite Share Download PDF Research Article Bacillus Pumilus Induced Tolerance of Maize ( Zea Mays L .) Against Cadmium (Cd) Stress Asim Shahzad, Mahmood Elahie, Muhammad Naeem, Tasmia Bashir, Humaira Yasmin, and 7 more This is a preprint; it has not been peer reviewed by a journal. https://doi.org/ 10.21203/rs.3.rs-567788/v1 This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License Status: Under Review Version 1 posted 9 You are reading this latest preprint version Abstract Purpose: Heavy metals contaminate the soil that alters the properties of soil and negatively affect plants growth. Using microorganism and plant can remove these pollutants from soil. The present investigation was designed to evaluate the induced effect of Bacillus pumilus on maize plant in Cadmium (Cd) contaminated soil. Methods: Three different concentrations of Cd (i.e. 0.25, 0.50 and 0.75 mg kg -1 ) were applied in soil under which maize plants were grown. The germination percentage, shoot length, leaf length, number of leaves, root length,fresh weight and nutrient uptake by maize plant were determined. The experiment was conducted by using complete randomized design (CRD) with three replicates. Results: The result indicated that germination percentage, Shoot length, leaf length, root length, number of leaves, and plant fresh weight were reduced by 37, 39, 39, 32 and 59% respectively at 0.75mg kg -1 of CdSO 4 concentration but when maize seeds inoculated with Bacillus pumilus significantly increased the germination percentage, shoot length, leaf length, number of leaves, plant fresh weight at different concentrations of CdSO 4 . Moreover, the plant protein were significantly increased by 60% in T6 (0.25 mg kg -1 of CdSO 4 +inoculated seed) and Peroxidase dismutase (POD) was also significantly higher by 346% in T6 (0.25 mg kg -1 of CdSO 4 +inoculated seed), however, the Superoxide dismutase (SOD) was significantly higher in T5 (0.75 mg kg -1 of CdSO 4 + uninoculated seed) and was 769% higher as compared to control. The Cd contents in Bacillus pumilus inoculated maize roots and shoots were decreased. Conclusion: The present investigations indicated that the inoculation of maize plant with Bacillus pumilus can help maize plants to withstand Cd stress but higher concentration of Cd can harm the plant. The Bacillus pumilus has good potential to remediate Cd from soil, and also have potential to reduce the phytoavailibility and toxicity of Cd. General Microbiology Plant Molecular Biology and Genetics General Cell Biology & Physiology Bacillus pumilus Cadmium (Cd) maize heavy metals bioremediation plant microbial interaction. Figures Figure 1 Figure 2 Figure 3 1. Introduction Soil is composed of different components of solid, liquid and gases in the form of “organic, inorganic and mineral particles” which support plants and animals by providing or transferring energy in various ways in the environment. (Vinita et al., 2013 ). These resources are divided into two main groups i.e. renewable and non-renewable resources. Soil is non-renewable resource, which is formed due to weathering of rocks by fluctuations in climate, weather and organismic activities (Berendse, van Ruijven, Jongejans, & Keesstra, 2015 ). At present time one of the main causes of pollution is heavy metals. These heavy metals remain untreated in soil and produce soil contamination which is very toxic for organisms. Heavy metals cannot be degraded by any process but it can be changed to less poisonous form. (Ayangbenro & Babalola, 2017 ). These heavy metals cause various diseases to plants and animals by oxidative stress, their sources may be anthropogenic as well as natural (Rai, Fulekar, & Fulekar, 2020 ). Heavy metals pollution are foremost pollutant of our food particularly vegetables which is contaminated by absorbing heavy metals from polluted soil, water and air due to disposal of industries and urban waste. The elements that have density greater than 5g cm-3 are called heavy metals (Shabir et al., 2018 ). The ingestion of heavy metals contaminated vegetables may lead to various long term lingering diseases like semphysema, bronchiolitis, and alveolitis, also short term disease like nervous, kidney, cardiovascular, and bone diseases (Venu, Jothimani, Krishnamoorthy, Prasanthrajan, & Kalpana, 2019 ). Soil adulteration with heavy metals is a common problem for world which is alarming threat for human health (Fereidoun et al., 2007 ). Cd is an unnecessary and greatly noxious heavy metal, which present in environment due to anthropogenic activities. Cd inhibit the plant to absorb important nutrients, in result plant growth is reduced which indicates Cd phytotoxicity (Karcz & Kurtyka, 2007 ). Cd is non-amphoteric in nature and not properly dissolves in base solution (Borsari, 2011 ). The development of plant organs bears harmful effect of heavy metals like lead (Pb) and Cd which reduce biomass of various plant species (Cimrin, Turan, & Kapur, 2007 ). The plant species grown in contaminated soil having high concentration of pollutant reduce plant organ formation (Opeolu, Bamgbose, Arowolo, & Adetunji, 2011 ). The crop which are produced in contaminated soil, absorb contaminants in their tissues and are very toxic for living organisms when are used as food. (Jolly, Islam, & Akbar, 2013 ). Different plant species accumulate different types of heavy metals in their tissues from contaminate site (Incrocci et al., 2010 ). Industrial pollutants contaminate water and play harmful impact on organisms. Uptake of toxic metals in plants effects variations in plant species, plants growth stage and translocation of metals (Mansoor et al., 2020 ). These heavy metals damage molecular structure of plant and animals. (Ghoneim et al., 2014 ). To eliminate contamination of non-degraded partials, phytoextraction is used which increase biomass and bio-concentration of plants. (Cherian, Ryu, & Cornish, 2019 ). There are different types of technologies used in present time to eliminate contaminants from polluted areas to reestablish natural condition. Phytoremediation is one of the best technology in which plant absorbs toxic substances from soil and water. Only selected plants are utilized for this purpose. (Cherian et al., 2019 ). Phytoremediation is an ecofriendly technology to remove toxic metals (Rahman & Singh, 2019 ). Numerous bacterial species are known that play vital role to tolerate plants under stress condition which can detoxify, transfer and collect heavy metals. Microorganisms and plants combine together against toxic effect of heavy metals by using rhizoremediation and phytoremediation mechanism. Microbes enhance the growth of plant in heavy metals stress. (Pathania & Srivastava, 2020 ). Plant absorbs heavy metals in soil and transport from root to shoot via xylem tissue after physiological process accumulates into grains. Plants having different genotype and capacity to detoxify heavy metals stress (Das & Jayalekshmy, 2015 ). Plant microbe’s interaction decomposes various pollutants and increase plant development and growth. (Truyens, Weyens, Cuypers, & Vangronsveld, 2015 ). A bulk of enzymes from bacteria, have been reported to be concerned in the biodegradation of toxic organic pollutants and remove the soil contamination, (Karigar & Rao, 2011 ). Previous reports demonstrated that several species of Bacillus can beneficially promote growth and enzyme system which may help the plants to overcome the biotic stresses (Lee et al., 2014 ). The application of several Bacillus strains in soil contaminated with heavy metals soil can help to reduce the harmful effects of heavy metals and enhances the plant growth. The Bacillus spp also have ability to accelerate the plant growth by increasing water uptake and reducing electrolyte leakage to mitigate Cd stress (Ahmad et al., 2014). B. licheniformis enhances Cu, Zn, Cd, Cr and Pb accumulation and distribution in plants grown in heavy metal-contaminated soil, which leads to reduced levels of toxic metals in soil (Brunetti et al., 2012 ). Similarly, higher concentration of Cd in soil reduce nutrient (P, Fe, Zn, and Mn) uptake in plants. B. pumilus is a promising plant growth promoting bacteria and in previous reports Sirajuddin et al., 2016 demonstrated that B. pumilus affected metal toxicity in tomato and rapeseed ( Brassica napus L.) The application of Bacillus spp. alleviate stress effect by reducing lipid peroxidation and SOD activity and increasing amylase and protease to promote plant growth in heavy metal-polluted soil (Pandey et al., 2013 ). Similarly, Bacillus spp. support plant tolerance against Zn and Cu stress by enhancing the activities of ROS scavenging enzymes, such as POD, SOD, CAT, APX, and DHAR (Gururani et al., 2013 ). The regulation of antioxidants in cells inhibits oxidative stress damage and triggers plant growth-promoting substances to enable plants to adapt to metal stress. Bacillus-mediated plant tolerance against Ni and Cr stresses is achieved through the enhancement of photosynthetic pigments and leghemoglobin, which leads to increased crop yield (Jamil et al., 2014 ). However, the effect of B. pumilus on Cd uptake by plants has received lesser attention. It is not clear whether plant physiological processes work independently or together with other mechanism like antioxidant system of plant under cd stresss. In this context, the present study was therefore performed to investigate the potential of Bacillus pumilus to induce growth and antioxidant enzymes of maize plants under Cd stress. 2. Materials And Method 2.1 Preparation of Heavy Metal Solution Three different concentration of CdSO 4 solution (0.25, 0.50 and 0.75 mg mL 1 ) were prepared for different treatment in pure distilled water by dissolving the Cd sulfate (CdSO 4 ). The different concentrations of CdSO 4 were selected on the basis of the previous scientific data (Sayari, Hamoudi, & Yang, 2005). Pure distilled water was used as control for the experiment. 100 mL of each solution was added in 1 kg of potted soil. 2.2 Preparation of Bacterial Inoculum The Bacillus Pumilus (Acc KF859972) used in this study was taken from phytohormone Lab Quaid-i-Azam University,Islamabad, Pakistan, on the basis of its plant growth indorsing latent (Shahzad et al. , 2016) . For the preparation of inoculum, the nutrient broth was purchased from OXOID-UK.. The nutrient broth was sterilized at 121 °C for 20 min. The isolated strain was inoculated in nutrient broth and incubated in shaker incubator (EXCELLA E24 Germany) at 150 rpm for 48-72 h. After that, the culture was centrifuged for 10 min at 3000 rpm . The pellet was again suspended in double distilled water and optical density (O.D) was adjusted to 0.100 at 660 nm with UV-VIS spectrophotometer. The inoculum was prepared by culture of bacterial strain having O.D 0.100 at 660 nm and bacterial density (10 6 cells/ml) 2.3 Seed Inoculation Maize ( Zea mays L.) seeds (KASHMIR GOLD) was obtained from NARC (National Agricultural Research Centre) Islamabad, Pakistan. The seeds were washed with ethanol (95%) for surface sterilization, following by soaking in 10% Chlorox for 2-3 min and subsequently the seeds were washed successively 2-3 times with autoclaved distilled water (Lindsey III, Rivero, Calhoun, Grotewold, & Brkljacic, 2017). Moreover all the methods were performed in accordance with the relevant guidelines given by the national agriculture research center for the cultivation of maize plants 2.4 Preparation of Treatment Applications The seeds were dipped in the inoculum for two to 2-3 hr. Then three different solutions of Cd sulphate prepared (i.e. 0.25, 0.50 and 0.75 mg kg -1 ). Eight different treatments with three replicates were made and five seeds of maize were sown in each pot (Table 1). For further analysis plants were harvested after 28 days of sowing. 2.5 Parameter Measured The germination percentage was observed after four day of sowing whereas, maize were harvested after 28 day of sowing. In order to remove non-aggregated soil, seedlings were slightly shaken. The following parameters were studied (Mo et al., 2016). Shoot and root lengths were measured from the root initiation up to the tip of the longest shoot and root. It was measured in centimeters (Vernay et al., 2008). Leaf size was measured in cm, from node to tip of the leaf (Badshah, Hussain, & Sher, 2016). Root length was measured from the junction of root and stem towards the tip of the longest root. It was measured in centimeters. (Jean et al., 2008). After harvesting plants from the pots, they were shaken to remove extra soil other than aggregates, the weight measured in grams (Pan et al., 2017). Leaf proline Proline content of maize plant leaves was determined by the method of (Bates, Waldren, & Teare, 1973). where the K value is 19.6. 2.6 Peroxidase dismutase assay The POD activity of maize leaves was measured by the method of (Van Assche, Cardinaels, & Clijsters, 1988). 2.7 Superoxide dismutase assay The SOD activity of maize leaves was measured by the method of (Beauchamp & Fridovich, 1971). The activity of SOD was expressed as units/100 g fresh weight. 2.8 Plant Nutrient Analysis The per chloric-acid digestion method was used to determined presence of the nutrients in the plant organs like root leaves and shoot (Chapin & Van Cleve, 2000). “Cations in plants= (ppm in extract - blank) × A × dilution factor” “WA=Total volume of extract (mL)” “W=Weight of dry plants 2.9 Statistical analysis The experiment was conducted in a completely randomized design (CRD) by using Statistic 8.1.1. (https://statistix.informer.com/8.1/).The results are the compare means and standard error of means of three replicates of a treatment. 3 Results The experiment was carried out in pots with complete randomize design (CRD) and plants were harvested after 28 th day of seed sowing and results were analyzed. Different parameter were observed i.e. fresh biomass, root length, shoot length, leaf size and number of leaves, Cd contents in roots, shoots and seeds germination . 3.1 Effect of Cadmium (Cd) on Maize Seed Germination Percentage The germination percentage was significantly increased with the inoculation of Bacillus pumillus (T2) , However the inhibition in germination was observed at all concentration of Cd as compared to the control. About 39% reduction in seed germination percentage was observed in T5 (0.75 mg kg -1 CdSO 4 + uninoculated seed) as compared to control. While inoculation of Bacillus pumillus in the presence of Cd increased the germination percentage however this increase was non-significant (fig 1a). The germination percentage was increased in Bacillus pumillus inoculated seeds as compared to control and uninoculated seeds. The maximum seed germination was observed in T2 ( Bacillus pumillus inoculated seed) which was 40% higher than control. 3.2 Effect of Cadmium (Cd) on Maize Shoot Length (cm) The Bacillus pumilus inoculation (T2) significantly induced shoot length of maize plant as compared to control (T1) but cadmium (Cd) inhibited the shoot length and maximum reduction (37%) in shoot length was observed in (T5) however Bacillus pumilus inoculation significantly increased the shoot length (fig.1b). The maximum shoot length was observed in treatment T2 ( Bacillus pumilus inoculated Seeds.) which was 39% higher than control while 37% reduction in shoot length was observed in T5 (0.75 mg CdSO 4 kg -1 + uninoculated seed) as compared to control. Cd also affected leaf length of maize plants. However, the inoculation of maize seeds with B. pumillus significantly enhanced the leaf length of maize plant at different concentration of Cd as compared to control and uninoculated maize plants. Moreover, 40% increase in leaf length was observed in T2 ( Bacillus pumillus inoculated seed) as compared to control while, seeds showed 39% reduction in leaf length in T5 (0.75 mg CdSO 4 kg -1 + uninoculated seed) as compared to control (fig.1c). The fig. 1d shows the root length of maize plant affected by Cd , however, the root length of inoculated maize seeds with Bacillus pumilus significantly increased when grown at different concentrations of Cd . The maximum (40 %) root length was observed in T2 ( Bacillus pumilus + seed) which were 40% higher than control and uninoculated plants, as compared to control. The reduction in root length was observed at different concentration of Cd and about 39 % reduction in root length was observed in T5 (0.75 mg CdSO 4 kg -1 + uninoculated seed) as compared to control, however inoculation of Bacillus pumilus significantly enhanced the rood length at different concentrations of Cd. The Cd affected the number of leaves in maize plants (fig 1e), while inoculation of maize seeds with Bacillus pumilus enhanced the number of leaves in maize plants at different concentrations of Cd. The number of leaves were increased by 42 % in T2 ( Bacillus pumilus inoculated Seed) as compared to control and uninoculated seeds, while uninoculated seeds T5 (0.75 mg CdSO 4 kg -1 + uninoculated seed) showed 32 % reduction in number of leaves as compared to control. The result presented in fig1 shows the Cd affected fresh weight of maize plants. However, inoculation of maize seeds with Bacillus pumilus notably enhanced the fresh biomass of maize plant at different concentration of Cd. The maximum (34 %) plant fresh weight was observed in T2 ( Bacillus pumilus inoculated seed) as compared to control, while 59% reduction in plant fresh biomass was observed in T5 (0.75 mg CdSO 4 kg -1 + uninoculated seed) as compared to control. 3.3 Effect of Cadmium (Cd) on Plant Protein Though a reduction in the protein content was observed in T5 (0.75 mg CdSO 4 kg -1 + uninoculated seed), and T8 (0.75 mg CdSO 4 kg -1 + inoculated seed) where heavy metals concentration was higher. But, the protein content percentage was significantly higher in T6 (0.25 mg CdSO 4 kg -1 + inoculated seed) by 60%. However, the lower concentration of Cd in (Cd) T3 (0.25 mg CdSO 4 kg -1 + uninoculated seed) also triggered the protein content in maize cultivar by 36% compared to control. In the presence of Bacillus pumilus T2 and T7 (0.50 mg CdSO 4 kg -1 + inoculated seed), showed an increase of 36 and 16% (Fig 2a) 3.4 Effect of Cadmium (Cd) on Peroxide dismutase (POD) Enzyme To scrutinize the effect of various concentrations of Cd, the antioxidant activities (POD and SOD) were determined. Results exhibited that treatment T6 (0.25 mg CdSO 4 kg -1 + inoculated seed), T5 (0.75 mg CdSO 4 kg -1 + uninoculated seed), T7 (0.50 mg CdSO 4 kg -1 + inoculated seed), T8 (0.75 mg CdSO 4 kg -1 + inoculated seed), and T3 (0.25 mg CdSO 4 kg -1 + un inoculated seed) showed a significant increase of 346, 246, 213, 106 and 106% as compared to control respectively. On the other hand, a reduction of 13% in POD activity was observed in treatment T2 ( Bacillus pumilus ). (Fig 2b) 3.5 Effect of Cadmium (Cd) on Superoxide dismutase (SOD) Enzyme The maximum antioxidant (SOD) activity was observed at a higher concentration of Cd specifically in T5 (0.75 mg CdSO 4 kg -1 + uninoculated Seed). The significant percentage increase of SOD was 769% when compared with control. Likewise, compared with control all other treatments showed a significant increase of SOD enzymatic activity in the presence of Bacillus pumilus in T8 (0.75 mg CdSO 4 kg -1 + inoculated Seed ), T6 0.25 mg CdSO 4 kg -1 + inoculated seed), T7 (0.50 mg CdSO 4 kg -1 + inoculated seed) and in uninoculated treatments, T4 (0.5 mg CdSO 4 kg -1 + uninoculated Seed), T3 (0.25 mg CdSO 4 kg -1 + uninoculated Seed) by 437, 338, 287, 220, and 125%. While treatment T2 ( Bacillus pumilus ) showed the least increase with 43% higher than control (T1) (Fig 2c) 3.6 Accumulation of Cadmium (Cd) in Maize Roots (mg/g) There was variation in the accumulation of Cd contents in maize roots which was observed in all the treatment as shown in fig. 3a. The maximum 45 % Cd uptake was found in T5 (0.75 mg CdSO0 4 kg -1 + uninoculated Seed) as compared to control. However, the Cd accumulation was reduced in all treatments when inoculated with Bacillus pumilus as compared to uninoculated seeds. The minimum 21 % Cd contents in maize plant were observed in T6 (0.25 mg CdSO0 4 kg -1 + inoculated Seed.) 3.7 Accumulation of Cadmium (Cd) by Maize Leaves (mg/g) The fig. 3b showed variation in Cd contents in maize plant leaves in all the treatment, however the maximum 90 % Cd uptake was found in T5 (0.75 mg CdSO0 4 kg -1 + uninoculated Seed) as compared to control. While Cd concentration was reduced in all treatments when inoculated with Bacillus pumilus as compared to control and uninoculated seeds. (The minimum 45 % Cd contents in maize plants observed in T6 (0.25 mg CdSO0 4 kg -1 + inoculated Seed.) Accumulation of Micro and Macro Nutrients by Maize Plants The results presented in table 2 showed Cu content increased in all the treatments when inoculated with Bacillus pumilus as compared to uninoculated plants. The maximum Cu content (10.14C) was observed in T3 and minimum in T5 (0.2D). The Mn content showed variations in inoculated and uninoculated seeds, and maximum content of Mn (7.9A) was recorded in T3 while minimum content of Mn was observed in T7 (1.16D). Inoculation decreases Na content in plant as compared to uninoculated plants. Maximum Na content observed in T3 (6.11A) and minimum was reported in T8 (0.48E) Fe content showed variation in inoculated seeds as compared to uninoculated seeds. Maximum Fe content was reported in T1 (2.89A) while minimum Fe was in T7 (0.54D). Inoculation of Bacillus pumilus increases Ca content in plants while uninoculated plants have low Ca content. Maximum Ca content found in T3 (6.81A) and minimum were found in T8 (0.60E) Mg and K content also showed variation in inoculated and uninoculated plants. Maximum Mg concentration was observed in T2 (1.36A) while minimum concentration was recorded in T5 (0.62D), and maximum K content was noted in T2 (2.72A) and minimum in T8 (o.29D). 4. Discussion The Cd contaminant adversely affects plants and animals directly and indirectly however, trace amount of Cd in soil did not harm plants. (Jolly et al., 2013). Cd enters into soil in different anthropogenic activities as well as by natural process. Heavy metals present in soil and air remain untreated and enters plant body through dust and moisture contents, which first impacts seeds, and roots of plants, afterwards damages shoots and leaves respectively (N. A. Anjum et al., 2016). It is obvious that germination or growth of plants is increased in inoculated treatments and the growth of maize plant affected by high concentration of Cd, however the effect is minimized by inoculating with Bacillus pumilus . During the present study, the germination was improved with the inoculation of Bacillus pumilus when grown over Cd and these findings are in agreement with (Bauddh & Singh, 2012), who reported that the inoculation of plant seeds with microorganism species like Pseudomonas, Pasteurella, Salmonella, Bacillus and Burkholderia have the ability to resist. The result finding are also supported by (Anjum et al., 2017), who reported that Cd toxicity has decreased seed germination percentage. The removal of heavy metals contaminants from contaminated site, the combined application of plant and microbe is a successful method as compared to the use of plant or bacteria separately (Tara et al., 2019). The higher concentration of lead (Pb) reduces the flower production (Alegbeleye, Opeolu, & Jackson, 2017). In the present study, Cd affected the maize plant in the same way. The higher concentration of Cd can cause plant toxicity and reduction in growth through interference with mineral and Cd absorption, and movement of necessary elements (Karcz & Kurtyka, 2007), The findings of present study are in accordance with these results. The Cd concentration reduced the plant growth and prompted phytochelatin (PC), Cd destructively lowers plant growth because it is non-essential element (Idrus, Basri, Rahim, Abd Rahim, & Chong, 2018). Inoculation of seeds with Bacillus pumilus also enhanced plant growth, this increase in plant length might be due to the production of phytohormones (Ryu & Patten, 2008). (Sandalio, Dalurzo, Gomez, Romero‐Puertas, & Del Rio, 2001) reported that the growth in bacterial inoculated seeds with different Cd concentrations showed significant leaf growth, which showed that bacterial inoculation can promote the tolerant capacity of plants which are in agreement with our findings in which the seed inoculated with Bacillus pumilus showed better leaf growth under Cd stress. Cd transported from soil to all parts of plants tissue, damages the tissues in various ways, so size of contaminated leaf stunted. Likewise (Fu et al., 2010), reported visual symptoms of chlorosis and necrosis in tomato plant when applied up to 25 and 50 μM of CdCl2. We also got same result when 75mg dose of Cd on maize plant caused wilting in uninoculated treatment but inoculated treatment did not showed these symptoms because Bacillus pumilus inhibit toxic symptoms by providing tolerance ability. Root is the first organ of plant which is affected by Cd and Cd adversely affects the root length. The study of (Ahmad et al., 2015), showed similar findings which showed decreased root length in the presence of Cd without any inoculation, because Cd destroyed the protein structure however root length showed better growth when inoculated with Bacillus pumilus. (Tamás, Fauvet, Christen, & Goloubinoff, 2018) and (Tiryakioglu, Eker, Ozkutlu, Husted, & Cakmak, 2006) also reported that accumulation of Cd in roots of Barlay plant was 25 % more than stem which inhibited the normal growth of plant root. The effects of heavy metals depend on type of environment and toxic substances uptake by plants. Greater the toxic substance in soil will cause reduction in plants growth. (Barceló & Poschenrieder, 2011) also confirmed our finding that in high level of Cd the maize plant showed reduced growth. The Cd stress in maize plant produce free radicals which damage membrane and cause leakage of electrolyte (Ahmad et al., 2015), therefore number of leaves decreased in Cd stress. (Weryszko‐Chmielewska & Chwil, 2005) reported soybean plant change its physiology as well as morphology like number, shape and size of leaf against Cd is agreement of our present finding in which the inoculation Bacillus pumilus significantly change the structure of bacterial community which enhance growth as compare to control after 15 days of experiment. (Herschkovitz, Lerner, Davidov, Okon, & Jurkevitch, 2005) confirmed our findings that Bacillus pulmilus promote the tolerance capacity of plants. In this study Bacillus pumilus also enhanced plant fresh weight by producing phytohormones like IAA and GA (Shafi, Tian, & Ji, 2017). These hormones increase the plant root and shoot length,, and leaf volume which promote fresh weight of maize plant. The Bacillus species also responsible for bioavailability of macro and micro nutrients from soil (Shahzad et al., 2016) have beneficial effect on plant fresh weight. Root secretions have vital function in altering metal bioavailability, these secretions have various compounds that combine with metals and restrict their movement in soil. These rhizo secretions also provide essential elements to microbial communities that enhance their growth and survival ability. Root secretions have different enzymes and protons that make the soil acidic and increase the heavy metal bioavailability (Ma, Oliveira, Freitas, & Zhang, 2016). (Poschenrieder, Cabot, Martos, Gallego, & Barceló, 2013) reported that maize plant accumulate Cd in shoots and inhibit the growth of shoot by damaging cell membrane which remove ions from damage site. Cd. Result presented in this experiment shows that Cd uptake by maize plant decrease in all treatments that were inoculated with Bacilus pumillus as compared to control and stressed plants. The reduction in Cd uptake was observed in plants that were inoculated with Bacillus pumilus and highest Cd uptake was observed in uninoculated plants. Bacillus pumilus converts Cd in to unavailable form in soil, and also reduces its toxicity. Previous studies also supported these results that inoculation with Bacilus species reduces Cd bioavailability (Ahemad & Khan, 2012, Choppala et al., 2014, Della Puppa, Komárek, Bordas, Bollinger, & Joussein, 2013). The plant possessess a well-organized antioxidant defense system. The accumulation of Cd toxicity was observed in maize cultivar with various treatments with B.pumillus and without B.pumillus inoculation in order to discern their ability to tolerate different concentration levels of Cd. The present study revealed that antioxidant activities (POD and SOD) stimulated at the higher concentration of Cd. The higher Cd concentrations in maize cause an increase in enzymatic activities because of the activation of enzymes that are already present in plants (Anjum, Ashraf, Khan, Saleem, & Wang, 2016, Guo et al., 2019, Lagriffoul, Mocquot, Mench, & Vangronsveld, 1998, Van Assche & Clijsters, 1990). Comparable changes in the enzymatic activities under different concentrations of heavy metals specifically Cd toxicity have been reported earlier (Ekmekçi, Tanyolac, & Ayhan, 2008), (Sun, Zhou, & Diao, 2008). However, some of the studies are in deviation with our results reporting a decrease in SOD activity under the higher concentration of Cd level (Ci, Jiang, Dai, Jing, & Cao, 2009, Lin et al., 2007, Xu et al., 2014). The deviation in results could ensue due to the difference in the time duration of Cd stress applied, the intensity of Cd, and specifically plant stage and cultivar. Moreover, no significant increase was observed in maize plants treated with Bacillus pumilus (Hayat et al., 2020). Present study depicted an increased SOD and POD activity at higher concentrations suggesting that both of these enzymes act simultaneously to avert the formation of OH ions and remove H 2 O 2 (Liu, Yuan, Chen, Li, & Liu, 2014, Xu et al., 2014). Therefore, the increased enzymatic (particularly SOD) activity at a higher concentration of Cd is considered a good indication for defensive mechanism stimulation (El Dakak & Hassan, 2020). In addition to this, it was observed in a study that the SOD activity was higher at the lower concentration of Cd in soil (20-25 mg/kg), normal when the concentration ranges between 50-75 mg/kg Cd in the soil and start to decrease when the soil Cd toxicity levels reached to 100 mg/kg (Xu et al., 2014). The decrease in the enzymatic activity perhaps might be attributed to inhibition caused by accelerating H 2 O 2 (Aravind & Prasad, 2003, Luo et al., 2015). Thus, heavy metal stress causes an induction of SOD and POD enzymes which in return provides protection and membrane integrity. It is a known phenomenon that Cd stress leads to the denaturation of proteins. The present study validated the phenomenon that with the gradual increase in the Cd toxicity level the protein content started to decrease. The results are in agreement with the preceding studies demonstrating the reduction of protein content in maize due to Cd stress (Hussain et al., 2018, Pál, Leskó, Janda, Páldi, & Szalai, 2007, Wang & Song, 2009). Heavy metals like aluminum, nickel, lead, and Cd accumulate in root of plants and effect metabolisms of plant by reducing cell elongation and new cell formation (Song et al., 2013) so, plant cannot promote their growth. Similarly in our present study plants treated with Cd showed stunted growth and accumulates maximum Cd in their roots. (Dresler, Wójcik, Bednarek, Hanaka, & Tukiendorf, 2015) also reported that most plant species like cucumber, rice, maize and etc. hold chief Cd concentration in their roots which reduced the plant growth by disturbing their metabolic activity. Cd. Soil polluted with Cd impacts roots of plants directly which disturb roots to uptake essential nutrients for metabolic activities of plants. However different plant species have tolerance capacity against specific heavy metals (Tsunemitsu et al., 2018). Conclusion In conclusion, Cd adversely affects the growth of maize ( Zea mays ) plant, however inoculation of maize seeds with Bacillus pumilus promoted the tolerance to Cd toxicity. The application of Bacillus pumilus (T2) showed significant affect than all other treatments in germination, plant height, leaf length, number of leaves and fresh weight. CdHigher Cd concentration in soil inhibited plant growth, while the inoculation of Bacillus pumilus significantly reduced the adverse effect of Cd in all the treatments. Treatment T6 was significantly different from all other treatments under Cd stress. Furthermore, the uptake of Cd in maize is decreased in the presence of Bacillus pumilus in soil which reduced the mobility of Cd leading to less Cd accumulation in maize plant. However 0.75 mg/100 ml of Cd was toxic to maize plant but the inoculation of maize seed with Bacillus pumilus was effective to reduce Cd toxicity and uptake (T5 and T8). The present investigation reveals that Bacillus pumilus inoculation can be used as bio-fertilizer in different level of Cd stress soil. Declarations Conflict of Interest: The author(s) declare that they do not have any conflict of interest. References Ahemad, M., & Khan, M. S. (2012). Evaluation of plant-growth-promoting activities of rhizobacterium Pseudomonas putida under herbicide stress. Annals of microbiology, 62 (4), 1531-1540. Ahmad, P., Sarwat, M., Bhat, N. A., Wani, M. R., Kazi, A. G., & Tran, L.-S. P. (2015). Alleviation of cadmium toxicity in Brassica juncea L.(Czern. & Coss.) by calcium application involves various physiological and biochemical strategies. PLoS ONE, 10 (1), e0114571. Ahmad, F., Ahmad, I., Khan, M.S., (2008) Screening of free-living rhizospheric bacteria for their ultiple plant growth promoting activities. Microbiological Research 163, 173–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micres.2006.04.001. Alegbeleye, O. O., Opeolu, B. O., & Jackson, V. A. (2017). Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons: a critical review of environmental occurrence and bioremediation. Environmental management, 60 (4), 758-783. Anjum, N. A., Rodrigo, M. A. M., Moulick, A., Heger, Z., Kopel, P., Zítka, O., . . . Pereira, E. (2016). Transport phenomena of nanoparticles in plants and animals/humans. Environmental Research, 151 , 233-243. Anjum, S. A., Ashraf, U., Khan, I., Saleem, M. F., & Wang, L. C. (2016). Chromium toxicity induced alterations in growth, photosynthesis, gas exchange attributes and yield formation in maize. Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 53 (4). Anjum, S. A., Tanveer, M., Hussain, S., Ashraf, U., Khan, I., & Wang, L. (2017). Alteration in growth, leaf gas exchange, and photosynthetic pigments of maize plants under combined cadmium and arsenic stress. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution, 228 (1), 1-12. Aravind, P., & Prasad, M. N. V. (2003). Zinc alleviates cadmium-induced oxidative stress in Ceratophyllum demersum L.: a free floating freshwater macrophyte. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 41 (4), 391-397. Ayangbenro, A. S., & Babalola, O. O. (2017). A new strategy for heavy metal polluted environments: a review of microbial biosorbents. International journal of environmental research and public health, 14 (1), 94. Badshah, L., Hussain, F., & Sher, Z. (2016). Floristic inventory, ecological characteristics and biological spectrum of plants of Parachinar, Kurram agency, Pakistan. Pak. J. Bot, 48 (4), 1547-1558. Barceló, J., & Poschenrieder, C. (2011). Hyperaccumulation of trace elements: from uptake and tolerance mechanisms to litter decomposition, selenium as an example. Plant and soil, 341 (1), 31-35. Bates, L. S., Waldren, R. P., & Teare, I. (1973). Rapid determination of free proline for water-stress studies. Plant and soil, 39 (1), 205-207. Bauddh, K., & Singh, R. P. (2012). Cadmium tolerance and its phytoremediation by two oil yielding plants Ricinus communis (L.) and Brassica juncea (L.) from the contaminated soil. International journal of phytoremediation, 14 (8), 772-785. Beauchamp, C., & Fridovich, I. (1971). Superoxide dismutase: improved assays and an assay applicable to acrylamide gels. Analytical biochemistry, 44 (1), 276-287. Berendse, F., van Ruijven, J., Jongejans, E., & Keesstra, S. (2015). Loss of plant species diversity reduces soil erosion resistance. Ecosystems, 18 (5), 881-888. Borsari, M. (2011). Cadmium: coordination chemistry. Encyclopedia of Inorganic and Bioinorganic Chemistry , 1-16. Brunetti, G., Farrag, K., Soler-Rovira, P., Ferrara, M., Nigro, F., and Senesi, N. (2012). The effect of compost and Bacillus licheniformis on the phytoextraction of Cr, Cu, Pb and Zn by three brassicaceae species from contaminated soils in the Apulia region, Southern Italy. Geoderma 170, 322–330. doi: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2011.11.029 Chapin, F. S., & Van Cleve, K. (2000). Approaches to studying nutrient uptake, use and loss in plants Plant physiological ecology (pp. 185-207): Springer. Cherian, S., Ryu, S. B., & Cornish, K. (2019). Natural rubber biosynthesis in plants, the rubber transferase complex, and metabolic engineering progress and prospects. Plant biotechnology journal, 17 (11), 2041-2061. Choppala, G., Saifullah, Bolan, N., Bibi, S., Iqbal, M., Rengel, Z., . . . Ok, Y. S. (2014). Cellular mechanisms in higher plants governing tolerance to cadmium toxicity. Critical reviews in plant sciences, 33 (5), 374-391. Ci, D., Jiang, D., Dai, T., Jing, Q., & Cao, W. (2009). Effects of cadmium on plant growth and physiological traits in contrast wheat recombinant inbred lines differing in cadmium tolerance. Chemosphere, 77 (11), 1620-1625. Cimrin, K. M., Turan, M., & Kapur, B. (2007). Effect of elemental sulphur on heavy metals solubility and remediation by plants in calcareous soils. Fresenius Environmental Bulletin, 16 (9), 1113-1120. Das, R., & Jayalekshmy, V. (2015). Mechanism of heavy metal tolerance and improvement of tolerance in crop plants. J Glob Biosci, 4 (7), 2678-2698. Della Puppa, L., Komárek, M., Bordas, F., Bollinger, J.-C., & Joussein, E. (2013). Adsorption of copper, cadmium, lead and zinc onto a synthetic manganese oxide. Journal of colloid and interface science, 399 , 99-106. Dresler, S., Wójcik, M., Bednarek, W., Hanaka, A., & Tukiendorf, A. (2015). The effect of silicon on maize growth under cadmium stress. Russian journal of plant physiology, 62 (1), 86-92. Ekmekçi, Y., Tanyolac, D., & Ayhan, B. (2008). Effects of cadmium on antioxidant enzyme and photosynthetic activities in leaves of two maize cultivars. Journal of plant physiology, 165 (6), 600-611. El Dakak, R. A., & Hassan, I. A. (2020). The alleviative effects of salicylic acid on physiological indices and defense mechanisms of maize (Zea Mays L. Giza 2) stressed with cadmium. Environmental Processes, 7 (3), 873-884. Fereidoun, H., Nourddin, M. S., Rreza, N. A., Mohsen, A., Ahmad, R., & Pouria, H. (2007). The effect of long-term exposure to particulate pollution on the lung function of Teheranian and Zanjanian students. Pakistan Journal of physiology, 3 (2). Fu, L.-J., Shi, K., Gu, M., Zhou, Y.-H., Dong, D.-K., Liang, W.-S., . . . Yu, J.-Q. (2010). Systemic induction and role of mitochondrial alternative oxidase and nitric oxide in a compatible tomato–tobacco mosaic virus interaction. Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions, 23 (1), 39-48. Ghoneim, M. M., El-Desoky, H. S., El-Moselhy, K. M., Amer, A., Abou El-Naga, E. H., Mohamedein, L. I., & Al-Prol, A. E. (2014). Removal of cadmium from aqueous solution using marine green algae, Ulva lactuca. The Egyptian Journal of Aquatic Research, 40 (3), 235-242. Gururani, M. A., Upadhyaya, C. P., Baskar, V., Venkatesh, J., Nookaraju, A., and Park, S. W. (2013). Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria enhance abiotic stress tolerance in Solanum tuberosum through inducing changes in the expression of ROS-scavenging enzymes and improved photosynthetic performance. Journal of Plant Growth and Regulation 32, 245–258. doi: 10.1007/s00344-012-9292-6 Guo, J., Qin, S., Rengel, Z., Gao, W., Nie, Z., Liu, H., . . . Zhao, P. (2019). Cadmium stress increases antioxidant enzyme activities and decreases endogenous hormone concentrations more in Cd-tolerant than Cd-sensitive wheat varieties. Ecotoxicology and environmental safety, 172 , 380-387. Hayat, K., Menhas, S., Bundschuh, J., Zhou, P., Niazi, N. K., Amna, . . . Wang, J. (2020). Plant growth promotion and enhanced uptake of Cd by combinatorial application of Bacillus pumilus and EDTA on Zea mays L. International Journal of Phytoremediation, 22 (13), 1372-1384. Herschkovitz, Y., Lerner, A., Davidov, Y., Okon, Y., & Jurkevitch, E. (2005). Azospirillum brasilense does not affect population structure of specific rhizobacterial communities of inoculated maize (Zea mays). Environmental microbiology, 7 (11), 1847-1852. Hussain, A., Ali, S., Rizwan, M., ur Rehman, M. Z., Javed, M. R., Imran, M., . . . Nazir, R. (2018). Zinc oxide nanoparticles alter the wheat physiological response and reduce the cadmium uptake by plants. Environmental Pollution, 242 , 1518-1526. Idrus, F. A., Basri, M. M., Rahim, K. A. A., Abd Rahim, N. S., & Chong, M. D. (2018). Concentrations of cadmium, copper, and zinc in Macrobrachium rosenbergii (giant freshwater prawn) from natural environment. Bulletin of environmental contamination and toxicology, 100 (3), 350-355. Incrocci, L., Massa, D., Pardossi, A., Bacci, L., Battista, P., Rapi, B., & Romani, M. (2010). A decision support system to optimise fertigation management in greenhouse crops. Paper presented at the XXVIII International Horticultural Congress on Science and Horticulture for People (IHC2010): International Symposium on 927. Jamil, M., Zeb, S., Anees, M., Roohi, A., Ahmed, I., ur-Rehman, S., et al. (2014). Role of Bacillus licheniformis in phytoremediation of nickel contaminated soil cultivated with rice. International Journal of Phytoremediation 16, 554–571. doi: 10.1080/15226514.2013.798621 Jean, L., Bordas, F., Gautier-Moussard, C., Vernay, P., Hitmi, A., & Bollinger, J.-C. (2008). Effect of citric acid and EDTA on chromium and nickel uptake and translocation by Datura innoxia. Environmental Pollution, 153 (3), 555-563. Jolly, Y. N., Islam, A., & Akbar, S. (2013). Transfer of metals from soil to vegetables and possible health risk assessment. SpringerPlus, 2 (1), 1-8. Karcz, W., & Kurtyka, R. (2007). Effect of cadmium on growth, proton extrusion and membrane potential in maize coleoptile segments. Biologia Plantarum, 51 (4), 713. Karigar, C. S., & Rao, S. S. (2011). Role of microbial enzymes in the bioremediation of pollutants: a review. Enzyme research, 2011 . Lagriffoul, A., Mocquot, B., Mench, M., & Vangronsveld, J. (1998). Cadmium toxicity effects on growth, mineral and chlorophyll contents, and activities of stress related enzymes in young maize plants (Zea mays L.). Plant and soil, 200 (2), 241-250. Lee, S.W., Lee, S.H., Balaraju, K., Park, K.S., Nam, K.W., Park, J.W., Park, K., (2014) Growth promotion and induced disease suppression of four vegetable crops by a selected plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) strain Bacillus subtilis 21-1 under two different soil conditions. Acta Physiolgia Plant. 36, 1353–1362. https://doi. org/10.1007/s11738-014-1514-z. Lin, R., Wang, X., Luo, Y., Du, W., Guo, H., & Yin, D. (2007). Effects of soil cadmium on growth, oxidative stress and antioxidant system in wheat seedlings (Triticum aestivum L.). Chemosphere, 69 (1), 89-98. Lindsey III, B. E., Rivero, L., Calhoun, C. S., Grotewold, E., & Brkljacic, J. (2017). Standardized method for high-throughput sterilization of Arabidopsis seeds. JoVE (Journal of Visualized Experiments) (128), e56587. Liu, K., Yuan, C., Chen, Y., Li, H., & Liu, J. (2014). Combined effects of ascorbic acid and chitosan on the quality maintenance and shelf life of plums. Scientia Horticulturae, 176 , 45-53. Luo, X.-S., Xue, Y., Wang, Y.-L., Cang, L., Xu, B., & Ding, J. (2015). Source identification and apportionment of heavy metals in urban soil profiles. Chemosphere, 127 , 152-157. Ma, Y., Oliveira, R. S., Freitas, H., & Zhang, C. (2016). Biochemical and molecular mechanisms of plant-microbe-metal interactions: relevance for phytoremediation. Frontiers in plant science, 7 , 918. Mansoor, S., Kour, N., Manhas, S., Zahid, S., Wani, O. A., Sharma, V., . . . El-Serehy, H. A. (2020). Biochar as a Tool for Effective Management of Drought and Heavy Metal Toxicity. Chemosphere , 129458. Mo, Y., Wang, Y., Yang, R., Zheng, J., Liu, C., Li, H., . . . Zhang, X. (2016). Regulation of plant growth, photosynthesis, antioxidation and osmosis by an arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus in watermelon seedlings under well-watered and drought conditions. Frontiers in Plant Science, 7 , 644. Opeolu, B. O., Bamgbose, O., Arowolo, T., & Adetunji, M. (2011). Utilisation of biomaterials as adsorbents for heavy metals’ removal from aqueous matrices. Pandey, S., Ghosh, P. K., Ghosh, S., De, T. K., and Maiti, T. K. (2013). Role of heavy metal resistant Ochrobactrum sp. and Bacillus spp. strains in bioremediation of a rice cultivar and their PGPR like activities. Journal of Microbiology 51, 11–17. doi: 10.1007/s12275-013-2330-7 Pál, M., Leskó, K., Janda, T., Páldi, E., & Szalai, G. (2007). Cadmium-induced changes in the membrane lipid composition of maize plants. Cereal Research Communications, 35 (4), 1631-1642. Pan, F., Meng, Q., Luo, S., Shen, J., Chen, B., Khan, K. Y., . . . Feng, Y. (2017). Enhanced Cd extraction of oilseed rape (Brassica napus) by plant growth-promoting bacteria isolated from Cd hyperaccumulator Sedum alfredii Hance. International journal of phytoremediation, 19 (3), 281-289. Pathania, D., & Srivastava, A. (2020). Advances in nanoparticles tailored lignocellulosic biochars for removal of heavy metals with special reference to cadmium (II) and chromium (VI). Environmental Sustainability , 1-14. Poschenrieder, C., Cabot, C., Martos, S., Gallego, B., & Barceló, J. (2013). Do toxic ions induce hormesis in plants? Plant science, 212 , 15-25. Rahman, Z., & Singh, V. P. (2019). The relative impact of toxic heavy metals (THMs)(arsenic (As), cadmium (Cd), chromium (Cr)(VI), mercury (Hg), and lead (Pb)) on the total environment: an overview. Environmental monitoring and assessment, 191 (7), 1-21. Rai, A., Fulekar, J., & Fulekar, M. (2020). Rhizospheric Microorganisms for the Remediation of Contaminants for Ecological Restoration Plant Microbiome Paradigm (pp. 163-174): Springer. Ryu, R. J., & Patten, C. L. (2008). Aromatic amino acid-dependent expression of indole-3-pyruvate decarboxylase is regulated by TyrR in Enterobacter cloacae UW5. Journal of bacteriology, 190 (21), 7200-7208. Sandalio, L., Dalurzo, H., Gomez, M., Romero‐Puertas, M., & Del Rio, L. (2001). Cadmium‐induced changes in the growth and oxidative metabolism of pea plants. Journal of experimental botany, 52 (364), 2115-2126. Sayari, A., Hamoudi, S., & Yang, Y. (2005). Applications of pore-expanded mesoporous silica. 1. Removal of heavy metal cations and organic pollutants from wastewater. Chemistry of materials, 17 (1), 212-216. Shabir, R., Abbas, G., Saqib, M., Shahid, M., Shah, G. M., Akram, M., . . . Ashraf, F. (2018). Cadmium tolerance and phytoremediation potential of acacia (Acacia nilotica L.) under salinity stress. International journal of phytoremediation, 20 (7), 739-746. Shafi, J., Tian, H., & Ji, M. (2017). Bacillus species as versatile weapons for plant pathogens: a review. Biotechnology & Biotechnological Equipment, 31 (3), 446-459. Shahzad, R., Waqas, M., Khan, A. L., Asaf, S., Khan, M. A., Kang, S.-M., . . . Lee, I.-J. (2016). Seed-borne endophytic Bacillus amyloliquefaciens RWL-1 produces gibberellins and regulates endogenous phytohormones of Oryza sativa. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 106 , 236-243. Sirajuddin, Khan, A., Ali, L., Chaudhary, H.J., Munis, M.F.H., Bano, A., Masood, S., 2016. Bacillus pumilus alleviates boron toxicity in tomato (Lycopersicum esculentum L.) due to enhanced antioxidant enzymatic activity. Science and Horticulture 200, 178–185. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.scienta.2016.01.024. Song, X.-Q., Liu, L.-F., Jiang, Y.-J., Zhang, B.-C., Gao, Y.-P., Liu, X.-L., . . . Zhou, Y.-H. (2013). Disruption of secondary wall cellulose biosynthesis alters cadmium translocation and tolerance in rice plants. Molecular plant, 6 (3), 768-780. Sun, Y., Zhou, Q., & Diao, C. (2008). Effects of cadmium and arsenic on growth and metal accumulation of Cd-hyperaccumulator Solanum nigrum L. Bioresource Technology, 99 (5), 1103-1110. Tamás, M. J., Fauvet, B., Christen, P., & Goloubinoff, P. (2018). Misfolding and aggregation of nascent proteins: a novel mode of toxic cadmium action in vivo. Current genetics, 64 (1), 177-181. Tara, N., Arslan, M., Hussain, Z., Iqbal, M., Khan, Q. M., & Afzal, M. (2019). On-site performance of floating treatment wetland macrocosms augmented with dye-degrading bacteria for the remediation of textile industry wastewater. Journal of cleaner production, 217 , 541-548. Tiryakioglu, M., Eker, S., Ozkutlu, F., Husted, S., & Cakmak, I. (2006). Antioxidant defense system and cadmium uptake in barley genotypes differing in cadmium tolerance. Journal of Trace Elements in Medicine and Biology, 20 (3), 181-189. Truyens, S., Weyens, N., Cuypers, A., & Vangronsveld, J. (2015). Bacterial seed endophytes: genera, vertical transmission and interaction with plants. Environmental Microbiology Reports, 7 (1), 40-50. Tsunemitsu, Y., Genga, M., Okada, T., Yamaji, N., Ma, J. F., Miyazaki, A., . . . Ueno, D. (2018). A member of cation diffusion facilitator family, MTP11, is required for manganese tolerance and high fertility in rice. Planta, 248 (1), 231-241. Van Assche, F., Cardinaels, C., & Clijsters, H. (1988). Induction of enzyme capacity in plants as a result of heavy metal toxicity: Dose-response relations in Phaseolus vulgaris L., treated with zinc and cadmium. Environmental pollution, 52 (2), 103-115. Van Assche, F., & Clijsters, H. (1990). Effects of metals on enzyme activity in plants. Plant, Cell & Environment, 13 (3), 195-206. Venu, V., Jothimani, P., Krishnamoorthy, S., Prasanthrajan, M., & Kalpana, P. (2019). Characterization of heavy metal contamination in mulberry cultivated soils of Erode district in Tamil Nadu. Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry, 8 (3), 730-733. Vernay, P., Gauthier-Moussard, C., Jean, L., Bordas, F., Faure, O., Ledoigt, G., & Hitmi, A. (2008). Effect of chromium species on phytochemical and physiological parameters in Datura innoxia. Chemosphere, 72 (5), 763-771. Vinita, S., Vartika, G., Kameshwar, S., Sonal, B., Reeta, K., & Neeti, D. (2013). Potential Application of antioxidants. Journal of Pharmacy Research, 7 (9), 828-835. Wang, C. Q., & Song, H. (2009). Calcium protects Trifolium repens L. seedlings against cadmium stress. Plant cell reports, 28 (9), 1341-1349. Weryszko‐Chmielewska, E., & Chwil, M. (2005). Lead‐Induced Histological and Ultrastructural Changes in the Leaves of Soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.). Soil Science & Plant Nutrition, 51 (2), 203-212. Xu, D., Zhao, Y., Sun, K., Gao, B., Wang, Z., Jin, J., . . . Liu, X. (2014). Cadmium adsorption on plant-and manure-derived biochar and biochar-amended sandy soils: impact of bulk and surface properties. Chemosphere, 111 , 320-326. Tables Tab. 1. Preparation Of Treatment Applications Treatments Bacillus pumilus inoculation CdSO4 (mg kg -1 ) T1 - 0 T2 + 0 T3 + 0.25 T4 + 0.50 T5 + 0.75 T6 - 0.25 T7 - 0.50 T8 - 0.75 Table 2. Accumulation of Micro and Macro Nutrients by Maize Plants Nutrients Nutrient concentration T1 T2 T3 T4 T5 T6 T7 T8 Cu (mg/g) 4.33±0.0.35C 6.84±0.171B 4.33±0.37C 2.66±0.151D 1.98± 0.13BD 2.66±0.29CD 2.37±0.28D 2.04±0.26D Mn (mg/g) 3.28±0.016C 6.40±0.26B 10.47±0.22A 3.33±0.07C 1.78±0.07BD 1.62±0.18D 1.16±0.04D 1.62±0.21D Na (g/Kg) 1.57±0.03D 5.13±0.18B 6.11±1.21A 2.56±0.19C 2.27±0.17C 0.90±0.04E 0.896±3.03E 0.49±0.5E K ( mg/g) 2.62±0.14A 2.72±0.15A 1.44±0.03B 1.03±0.01BC 0.38±0.01D 0.41±0.02D 0.83±0.22CD 0.29±0.02 D Fe (mg/g) 2.89±0.24A 1.65±0.15BC 1.41±0.15BCD 0.70±0.14BCD 1.15±2.26BCD 2.04±8.23AB 0.54±1.19D 1.29±0.20BCD Ca (g/Kg) 1.68±0.12D 4.53±0.14B 6.81±0.13A 5.26±0.020B 2.49±0.13C 2.36±0.19DCD 2.47±0.20C O6.07±0.14E Mg (g/Kg) 1.18±0.01AB 1.36±0.142A 0.75±0.13BCD 1.11.±0.020ABC O.62±0.019CD 1.066±0.020ABCD 0,56±0.0135D 0.66±0.54CD All treatments sharing common letter are similar otherwise differ significantly at p<0.05 T1= control, T2= inoculated seed, T3= 0.25mg CdSO 4 100mL -1 + uninoculated seed, T4= 0.50mg CdSO 4 100mL -1 + uninoculated seed, T5= 0.75mg CdSO 4 100mL -1 + uninoculated seed, T6= 0.25mg CdSO 4 100mL -1 , + Inoculated seed, T7= 0. CdSO 4 100mL -1 + Inoculated seed, T8= 0.75mg CdSO 4 100mL -1 + Inoculated seed Additional Declarations No competing interests reported. Cite Share Download PDF Status: Under Review Version 1 posted Editorial decision: Major revision 07 Jul, 2021 Reviews received at journal 25 Jun, 2021 Reviewers agreed at journal 24 Jun, 2021 Reviewers agreed at journal 14 Jun, 2021 Reviewers invited by journal 31 May, 2021 Editor assigned by journal 31 May, 2021 Editor invited by journal 31 May, 2021 Submission checks completed at journal 28 May, 2021 First submitted to journal 27 May, 2021 You are reading this latest preprint version Research Square lets you share your work early, gain feedback from the community, and start making changes to your manuscript prior to peer review in a journal. As a division of Research Square Company, we’re committed to making research communication faster, fairer, and more useful. We do this by developing innovative software and high quality services for the global research community. Our growing team is made up of researchers and industry professionals working together to solve the most critical problems facing scientific publishing. Also discoverable on Platform About Our Team In Review Editorial Policies Advisory Board Help Center Resources Author Services Accessibility API Access RSS feed Manage Cookie Preferences © Research Square 2026 | ISSN 2693-5015 (online) Privacy Policy Terms of Service Do Not Sell My Personal Information {"props":{"pageProps":{"initialData":{"identity":"rs-567788","acceptedTermsAndConditions":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"archivedVersions":[],"articleType":"Research Article","associatedPublications":[],"authors":[{"id":29893491,"identity":"c3c34d7d-475a-4fc5-a409-d86b453cd52a","order_by":0,"name":"Asim Shahzad","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Henan University","correspondingAuthor":false,"submittingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Asim","middleName":"","lastName":"Shahzad","suffix":""},{"id":29893492,"identity":"50f558dd-3cdc-4d2a-8f42-4b44705a34b5","order_by":1,"name":"Mahmood Elahie","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Mohi-ud-Din Islamic University","correspondingAuthor":false,"submittingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Mahmood","middleName":"","lastName":"Elahie","suffix":""},{"id":29893493,"identity":"ed451583-645b-48ee-ba7b-2d61e73d4f21","order_by":2,"name":"Muhammad Naeem","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"University of Okara","correspondingAuthor":false,"submittingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Muhammad","middleName":"","lastName":"Naeem","suffix":""},{"id":29893494,"identity":"821e69f7-9670-4759-9d81-04a466d4d69e","order_by":3,"name":"Tasmia Bashir","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Quaid-i-Azam University","correspondingAuthor":false,"submittingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Tasmia","middleName":"","lastName":"Bashir","suffix":""},{"id":29893495,"identity":"b696f466-0d6d-47a9-8048-93f32429ad75","order_by":4,"name":"Humaira Yasmin","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"COMSATS University Islamabad","correspondingAuthor":false,"submittingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Humaira","middleName":"","lastName":"Yasmin","suffix":""},{"id":29893496,"identity":"f59b1e6b-62a1-4ef0-bacc-dab5780e0c3f","order_by":5,"name":"Muhammad Younas","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Mohi-ud-Din Islamic University","correspondingAuthor":false,"submittingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Muhammad","middleName":"","lastName":"Younas","suffix":""},{"id":29893497,"identity":"1d34fd9c-df18-49e7-bc2a-8ab13ce3a30b","order_by":6,"name":"Ahsan Areeb","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Bahauddin Zakariya University","correspondingAuthor":false,"submittingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Ahsan","middleName":"","lastName":"Areeb","suffix":""},{"id":29893498,"identity":"728df6fd-86a2-4488-9a1e-e39afe89277a","order_by":7,"name":"Muhammad Irfan","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Bahauddin Zakariya University","correspondingAuthor":false,"submittingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Muhammad","middleName":"","lastName":"Irfan","suffix":""},{"id":29893499,"identity":"7ae54fc6-17e1-4a93-b39a-54f7d44c6527","order_by":8,"name":"Motsim Billah","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Abasyn University","correspondingAuthor":false,"submittingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Motsim","middleName":"","lastName":"Billah","suffix":""},{"id":29893500,"identity":"275b7497-0350-4dff-a43b-95032a892c15","order_by":9,"name":"Abdul Shakoor","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Henan University","correspondingAuthor":false,"submittingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Abdul","middleName":"","lastName":"Shakoor","suffix":""},{"id":29893501,"identity":"d7bbc93e-a50a-4a77-bbde-f0edef18d2c9","order_by":10,"name":"Saman Zulfiqar","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Govt Sadiq College, Women University, Bahawalpur, Pakistan","correspondingAuthor":false,"submittingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Saman","middleName":"","lastName":"Zulfiqar","suffix":""},{"id":29893502,"identity":"ae4b995a-f588-4dba-99ac-0e5a160efe11","order_by":11,"name":"Mingzhou Qin","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Henan University","correspondingAuthor":true,"submittingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Mingzhou","middleName":"","lastName":"Qin","suffix":""}],"badges":[],"createdAt":"2021-05-27 15:29:10","currentVersionCode":1,"declarations":"","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-567788/v1","doiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-567788/v1","draftVersion":[],"editorialEvents":[],"editorialNote":"","failedWorkflow":false,"files":[{"id":10003033,"identity":"bc1a3a27-03f8-4eb3-bd4f-e6ddf13a877b","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2021-06-04 19:41:08","extension":"png","order_by":1,"title":"Figure 1","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":160036,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"Effect of Cadmium (Cd) on Maize Seed Germination %(a), Shoot Length (b) Leaf Length (c) Root Length (d) No. of Leaves (e) Fresh Weight (f)\nAll treatments sharing common letter with similar bar pattern are similar otherwise differ significantly at p\u003c0.05\nT1= control, T2= inoculated seed, T3= 0.25mg CdSO4 100mL -1+ uninoculated seed, T4= B=0.50mg CdSO4 100mL -1+ uninoculated seed, T5= 0.75mg CdSO4 100mL -1+ uninoculated seed, T6= 0.25mg CdSO4 100mL -1, + Inoculated seed, T7= 0. CdSO4 100mL -1+ Inoculated seed, T8= 0.75mg CdSO4 100mL -1+ Inoculated seed","description":"","filename":"1.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-567788/v1/ebe01fa035d761e856a88c04.png"},{"id":10002806,"identity":"d8ef39bf-0c2f-48cc-883e-8a20d64e89d3","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2021-06-04 19:38:08","extension":"png","order_by":2,"title":"Figure 2","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":121069,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"Effect of Cadmium (Cd) on Maize protein (a) antioxidant enzymes peroxidase dismutase (b) and super oxidase dismutase (c)\nAll treatments sharing common letter with similar bar pattern are similar otherwise differ significantly at p\u003c0.05\nT1= control, T2= inoculated seed, T3= 0.25mg CdSO4 100mL -1+ uninoculated seed, T4= B=0.50mg CdSO4 100mL -1+ uninoculated seed, T5= 0.75mg CdSO4 100mL -1+ uninoculated seed, T6= 0.25mg CdSO4 100mL -1, + Inoculated seed, T7= 0. CdSO4 100mL -1+ Inoculated seed, T8= 0.75mg CdSO4 100mL -1+ Inoculated seed","description":"","filename":"2.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-567788/v1/ea903b2455812e94f9a30d37.png"},{"id":10002807,"identity":"1a8decaa-a723-44e6-9bf2-61257c4a888f","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2021-06-04 19:38:08","extension":"png","order_by":3,"title":"Figure 3","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":91539,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"Accumulation of Cadmium (Cd) in Maize Roots (a) and Maize Leaves (b)\nAll treatments sharing common letter with similar bar pattern are similar otherwise differ significantly at p\u003c0.05\nT1= control, T2= inoculated seed, T3= 0.25mg CdSO4 100mL -1+ uninoculated seed, T4= B=0.50mg CdSO4 100mL -1+ uninoculated seed, T5= 0.75mg CdSO4 100mL -1+ uninoculated seed, T6= 0.25mg CdSO4 100mL -1, + Inoculated seed, T7= 0. CdSO4 100mL -1+ Inoculated seed, T8= 0.75mg CdSO4 100mL -1+ Inoculated seed","description":"","filename":"3.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-567788/v1/bbdc2fce0321045347b7483d.png"},{"id":15673106,"identity":"bf6ebf90-d1c0-496e-ac82-f1556e456cb9","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2021-11-18 14:16:15","extension":"pdf","order_by":0,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"manuscript-pdf","size":870423,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"manuscript.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-567788/v1/facb3d69-62bd-45d7-b614-79ef66272578.pdf"}],"financialInterests":"No competing interests reported.","formattedTitle":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eBacillus Pumilus\u003c/em\u003e Induced Tolerance of Maize (\u003cem\u003eZea Mays\u003c/em\u003e \u003cem\u003eL\u003c/em\u003e.) Against Cadmium (Cd) Stress\u003c/p\u003e","fulltext":[{"header":"1. Introduction","content":" \u003cp\u003eSoil is composed of different components of solid, liquid and gases in the form of \u0026ldquo;organic, inorganic and mineral particles\u0026rdquo; which support plants and animals by providing or transferring energy in various ways in the environment. (Vinita et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR78\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2013\u003c/span\u003e). These resources are divided into two main groups i.e. renewable and non-renewable resources. Soil is non-renewable resource, which is formed due to weathering of rocks by fluctuations in climate, weather and organismic activities (Berendse, van Ruijven, Jongejans, \u0026amp; Keesstra, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR15\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2015\u003c/span\u003e). At present time one of the main causes of pollution is heavy metals. These heavy metals remain untreated in soil and produce soil contamination which is very toxic for organisms. Heavy metals cannot be degraded by any process but it can be changed to less poisonous form. (Ayangbenro \u0026amp; Babalola, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR9\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2017\u003c/span\u003e). These heavy metals cause various diseases to plants and animals by oxidative stress, their sources may be anthropogenic as well as natural (Rai, Fulekar, \u0026amp; Fulekar, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR59\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2020\u003c/span\u003e). Heavy metals pollution are foremost pollutant of our food particularly vegetables which is contaminated by absorbing heavy metals from polluted soil, water and air due to disposal of industries and urban waste. The elements that have density greater than 5g cm-3 are called heavy metals (Shabir et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR63\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2018\u003c/span\u003e). The ingestion of heavy metals contaminated vegetables may lead to various long term lingering diseases like semphysema, bronchiolitis, and alveolitis, also short term disease like nervous, kidney, cardiovascular, and bone diseases (Venu, Jothimani, Krishnamoorthy, Prasanthrajan, \u0026amp; Kalpana, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR76\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2019\u003c/span\u003e). Soil adulteration with heavy metals is a common problem for world which is alarming threat for human health (Fereidoun et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR28\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2007\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eCd is an unnecessary and greatly noxious heavy metal, which present in environment due to anthropogenic activities. Cd inhibit the plant to absorb important nutrients, in result plant growth is reduced which indicates Cd phytotoxicity (Karcz \u0026amp; Kurtyka, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR41\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2007\u003c/span\u003e). Cd is non-amphoteric in nature and not properly dissolves in base solution (Borsari, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR16\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2011\u003c/span\u003e). The development of plant organs bears harmful effect of heavy metals like lead (Pb) and Cd which reduce biomass of various plant species (Cimrin, Turan, \u0026amp; Kapur, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR22\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2007\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe plant species grown in contaminated soil having high concentration of pollutant reduce plant organ formation (Opeolu, Bamgbose, Arowolo, \u0026amp; Adetunji, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR52\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2011\u003c/span\u003e). The crop which are produced in contaminated soil, absorb contaminants in their tissues and are very toxic for living organisms when are used as food. (Jolly, Islam, \u0026amp; Akbar, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR40\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2013\u003c/span\u003e). Different plant species accumulate different types of heavy metals in their tissues from contaminate site (Incrocci et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR37\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2010\u003c/span\u003e). Industrial pollutants contaminate water and play harmful impact on organisms. Uptake of toxic metals in plants effects variations in plant species, plants growth stage and translocation of metals (Mansoor et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR50\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2020\u003c/span\u003e). These heavy metals damage molecular structure of plant and animals. (Ghoneim et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR30\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2014\u003c/span\u003e). To eliminate contamination of non-degraded partials, phytoextraction is used which increase biomass and bio-concentration of plants. (Cherian, Ryu, \u0026amp; Cornish, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR19\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2019\u003c/span\u003e). There are different types of technologies used in present time to eliminate contaminants from polluted areas to reestablish natural condition. Phytoremediation is one of the best technology in which plant absorbs toxic substances from soil and water. Only selected plants are utilized for this purpose. (Cherian et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR19\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2019\u003c/span\u003e). Phytoremediation is an ecofriendly technology to remove toxic metals (Rahman \u0026amp; Singh, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR58\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2019\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eNumerous bacterial species are known that play vital role to tolerate plants under stress condition which can detoxify, transfer and collect heavy metals. Microorganisms and plants combine together against toxic effect of heavy metals by using rhizoremediation and phytoremediation mechanism. Microbes enhance the growth of plant in heavy metals stress. (Pathania \u0026amp; Srivastava, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR56\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2020\u003c/span\u003e). Plant absorbs heavy metals in soil and transport from root to shoot via xylem tissue after physiological process accumulates into grains. Plants having different genotype and capacity to detoxify heavy metals stress (Das \u0026amp; Jayalekshmy, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR23\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2015\u003c/span\u003e). Plant microbe\u0026rsquo;s interaction decomposes various pollutants and increase plant development and growth. (Truyens, Weyens, Cuypers, \u0026amp; Vangronsveld, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR72\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2015\u003c/span\u003e). A bulk of enzymes from bacteria, have been reported to be concerned in the biodegradation of toxic organic pollutants and remove the soil contamination, (Karigar \u0026amp; Rao, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR42\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2011\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003ePrevious reports demonstrated that several species of \u003cem\u003eBacillus\u003c/em\u003e can beneficially promote growth and enzyme system which may help the plants to overcome the biotic stresses (Lee et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR44\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2014\u003c/span\u003e). The application of several \u003cem\u003eBacillus\u003c/em\u003e strains in soil contaminated with heavy metals soil can help to reduce the harmful effects of heavy metals and enhances the plant growth. The \u003cem\u003eBacillus\u003c/em\u003e spp also have ability to accelerate the plant growth by increasing water uptake and reducing electrolyte leakage to mitigate Cd stress (Ahmad et al., 2014). \u003cem\u003eB. licheniformis\u003c/em\u003e enhances Cu, Zn, Cd, Cr and Pb accumulation and distribution in plants grown in heavy metal-contaminated soil, which leads to reduced levels of toxic metals in soil (Brunetti et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR17\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2012\u003c/span\u003e). Similarly, higher concentration of Cd in soil reduce nutrient (P, Fe, Zn, and Mn) uptake in plants. \u003cem\u003eB. pumilus\u003c/em\u003e is a promising plant growth promoting bacteria and in previous reports Sirajuddin et al., 2016 demonstrated that \u003cem\u003eB. pumilus\u003c/em\u003e affected metal toxicity in tomato and rapeseed (\u003cem\u003eBrassica napus\u003c/em\u003e L.) The application of \u003cem\u003eBacillus spp.\u003c/em\u003e alleviate stress effect by reducing lipid peroxidation and SOD activity and increasing amylase and protease to promote plant growth in heavy metal-polluted soil (Pandey et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR53\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2013\u003c/span\u003e). Similarly, \u003cem\u003eBacillus spp.\u003c/em\u003e support plant tolerance against Zn and Cu stress by enhancing the activities of ROS scavenging enzymes, such as POD, SOD, CAT, APX, and DHAR (Gururani et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR31\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2013\u003c/span\u003e). The regulation of antioxidants in cells inhibits oxidative stress damage and triggers plant growth-promoting substances to enable plants to adapt to metal stress. Bacillus-mediated plant tolerance against Ni and Cr stresses is achieved through the enhancement of photosynthetic pigments and leghemoglobin, which leads to increased crop yield (Jamil et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR38\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2014\u003c/span\u003e). However, the effect of \u003cem\u003eB. pumilus\u003c/em\u003e on Cd uptake by plants has received lesser attention. It is not clear whether plant physiological processes work independently or together with other mechanism like antioxidant system of plant under cd stresss. In this context, the present study was therefore performed to investigate the potential of \u003cem\u003eBacillus pumilus\u003c/em\u003e to induce growth and antioxidant enzymes of maize plants under Cd stress.\u003c/p\u003e "},{"header":"2. Materials And Method","content":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e2.1 Preparation of Heavy Metal Solution\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThree different concentration of CdSO\u003csub\u003e4\u003c/sub\u003e solution (0.25, 0.50 and 0.75 mg mL\u003csup\u003e1\u003c/sup\u003e) were prepared for different treatment in pure distilled water by dissolving the Cd sulfate (CdSO\u003csub\u003e4\u003c/sub\u003e). The different concentrations of CdSO\u003csub\u003e4 \u003c/sub\u003ewere selected on the basis of the previous scientific data (Sayari, Hamoudi, \u0026amp; Yang, 2005). Pure distilled water was used as control for the experiment. 100 mL of each solution was added in 1 kg of potted soil.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e2.2 Preparation of Bacterial Inoculum \u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe \u003cstrong\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cem\u003eBacillus Pumilus \u003c/em\u003e(Acc KF859972) used in this study was taken from phytohormone Lab Quaid-i-Azam University,Islamabad, Pakistan, on the basis of its plant growth indorsing latent (Shahzad et al.\u003cem\u003e,\u003c/em\u003e 2016)\u003cstrong\u003e. \u003c/strong\u003eFor the preparation of inoculum, the nutrient broth was purchased from OXOID-UK.. The nutrient broth was sterilized at 121 \u0026deg;C for 20 min. The isolated strain was inoculated in nutrient broth and incubated in shaker incubator (EXCELLA E24 Germany) at 150 rpm for 48-72 h. After that, the culture was centrifuged for 10 min at 3000 rpm\u003cstrong\u003e. \u003c/strong\u003eThe pellet was again suspended in double distilled water and optical density (O.D) was adjusted to 0.100 at 660 nm with UV-VIS spectrophotometer. The inoculum was prepared by culture of bacterial strain having O.D 0.100 at 660 nm and bacterial density (10\u003csup\u003e6\u003c/sup\u003e cells/ml)\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e2.3 Seed Inoculation\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eMaize (\u003cem\u003eZea mays\u003c/em\u003e L.) seeds (KASHMIR GOLD) was obtained from NARC (National Agricultural Research Centre) Islamabad, Pakistan. The seeds were\u0026nbsp; washed with ethanol (95%) for surface sterilization, \u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;following by soaking in 10% Chlorox for 2-3 min and subsequently the seeds were washed successively 2-3 times with autoclaved distilled water (Lindsey III, Rivero, Calhoun, Grotewold, \u0026amp; Brkljacic, 2017). Moreover all the methods were performed in accordance with the relevant guidelines given by the national agriculture research center for the cultivation of maize plants\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e2.4 Preparation of Treatment Applications\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe seeds were dipped in the inoculum for two to 2-3 hr. Then three different solutions of Cd sulphate prepared (i.e. 0.25, 0.50 and 0.75 mg kg\u003csup\u003e-1\u003c/sup\u003e). Eight different treatments with three replicates were made and five seeds of maize were sown in each pot (Table 1). For further analysis plants were harvested after 28 days of sowing.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e2.5 Parameter Measured \u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe germination percentage was observed after four day of sowing whereas, maize were harvested after 28 day of sowing. In order to remove non-aggregated soil, seedlings were slightly shaken. The following parameters were studied (Mo et al., 2016). Shoot and root lengths were measured from the root initiation up to the tip of the longest shoot and root. It was measured in centimeters (Vernay et al., 2008). Leaf size was measured in cm, from node to tip of the leaf (Badshah, Hussain, \u0026amp; Sher, 2016).\u0026nbsp; Root length was measured from the junction of root and stem towards the tip of the longest root. It was measured in centimeters. (Jean et al., 2008). After harvesting plants from the pots, they were shaken to remove extra soil other than aggregates, the weight measured in grams (Pan et al., 2017).\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eLeaf proline\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eProline content of maize plant leaves was determined by the method of (Bates, Waldren, \u0026amp; Teare, 1973).\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ewhere the \u003cem\u003eK\u003c/em\u003e value is 19.6.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e2.6 Peroxidase dismutase assay\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe POD activity of maize leaves was measured by the method of (Van Assche, Cardinaels, \u0026amp; Clijsters, 1988).\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e2.7 Superoxide dismutase assay\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe SOD activity of maize leaves was measured by the method of (Beauchamp \u0026amp; Fridovich, 1971). The activity of SOD was expressed as units/100\u0026nbsp;g fresh weight.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e2.8 Plant Nutrient Analysis\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe per chloric-acid digestion method was used to determined presence of the nutrients in the\u0026nbsp; plant organs like root leaves and shoot (Chapin \u0026amp; Van Cleve, 2000).\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u0026ldquo;Cations in plants= (ppm in extract - blank) \u0026times;\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp; A\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp; \u0026times; dilution factor\u0026rdquo;\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u0026ldquo;WA=Total volume of extract (mL)\u0026rdquo;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u0026ldquo;W=Weight of dry plants\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e2.9 Statistical analysis\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe experiment was conducted in a completely randomized design (CRD) by using Statistic 8.1.1.\u0026nbsp; (https://statistix.informer.com/8.1/).The results are the compare means and standard error of means of three replicates of a treatment.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"3 Results","content":"\u003cp\u003eThe experiment was carried out in pots with complete randomize design (CRD) and plants were harvested after 28\u003csup\u003eth\u003c/sup\u003e day of seed sowing and results were analyzed. Different parameter were observed i.e. fresh biomass, root length, shoot length, leaf size and number of leaves, Cd contents in roots, shoots and seeds germination .\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e3.1 Effect of Cadmium (Cd) on Maize Seed Germination Percentage\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe germination percentage was significantly increased with the inoculation of \u003cem\u003eBacillus\u003c/em\u003e\u003cem\u003e pumillus\u003c/em\u003e (T2) , However the inhibition in germination was observed at all concentration of Cd as compared to the control. About 39% reduction in seed germination percentage was observed in T5 (0.75 mg kg\u003csup\u003e-1\u003c/sup\u003e CdSO\u003csub\u003e4\u003c/sub\u003e+ uninoculated seed) as compared to control. While inoculation of \u003cem\u003eBacillus\u003c/em\u003e\u003cem\u003e pumillus \u003c/em\u003ein the presence of Cd increased the germination percentage however this increase was non-significant (fig 1a). The germination percentage was increased in \u003cem\u003eBacillus\u003c/em\u003e\u003cem\u003e pumillus\u003c/em\u003e inoculated seeds as compared to control and uninoculated seeds. The maximum seed germination was observed in T2 (\u003cem\u003eBacillus\u003c/em\u003e\u003cem\u003e pumillus\u003c/em\u003e inoculated seed) which was 40% higher than control. \u003cstrong\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e3.2 Effect of Cadmium (Cd) on Maize Shoot Length (cm) \u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe \u003cem\u003eBacillus pumilus \u003c/em\u003einoculation (T2) significantly induced shoot length of maize plant as compared to control (T1) but cadmium (Cd) inhibited the shoot length and maximum reduction (37%)\u0026nbsp; in shoot length was observed in (T5) \u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;however \u003cem\u003eBacillus pumilus\u003c/em\u003e inoculation significantly increased the shoot length (fig.1b). The maximum shoot length was observed in treatment T2 (\u003cem\u003eBacillus pumilus\u003c/em\u003e inoculated Seeds.) which was 39% higher than control while 37% reduction in shoot length was observed in T5 (0.75 mg CdSO\u003csub\u003e4\u003c/sub\u003e kg\u003csup\u003e-1\u003c/sup\u003e\u003csub\u003e +\u003c/sub\u003e uninoculated seed) as compared to control. Cd also affected leaf length of maize plants. However, the inoculation of maize seeds with\u003cem\u003e B. pumillus\u003c/em\u003e significantly enhanced the leaf length of maize plant at different concentration of Cd as compared to control and uninoculated maize plants. Moreover, 40% increase in leaf length was observed in T2 (\u003cem\u003eBacillus pumillus\u003c/em\u003e inoculated seed) as compared to control while, seeds showed 39% reduction in leaf length in T5 (0.75 mg CdSO\u003csub\u003e4 \u003c/sub\u003ekg\u003csup\u003e-1\u003c/sup\u003e+ uninoculated seed) as compared to control (fig.1c). The fig. 1d shows the root length of maize plant affected by Cd , however, the root length of inoculated maize seeds with \u003cem\u003eBacillus pumilus\u003c/em\u003e significantly increased when grown at different concentrations of Cd . The maximum (40 %) root length was observed in T2 (\u003cem\u003eBacillus pumilus \u003c/em\u003e+ seed) which were 40% higher than control and uninoculated plants, as compared to control. The reduction in root length was observed at different concentration of Cd and about\u0026nbsp; 39 % reduction in root length was observed in T5 (0.75 mg CdSO\u003csub\u003e4 \u003c/sub\u003ekg\u003csup\u003e-1\u003c/sup\u003e \u003csub\u003e+\u003c/sub\u003e uninoculated seed) as compared to control, however inoculation of \u003cem\u003eBacillus pumilus\u003c/em\u003e significantly enhanced the rood length at different concentrations of Cd. The Cd affected the number of leaves in maize plants (fig 1e), while inoculation of maize seeds with \u003cem\u003eBacillus pumilus\u003c/em\u003e enhanced the number of leaves in maize plants at different concentrations of Cd. The number of leaves were increased by 42 % in T2 (\u003cem\u003eBacillus pumilus\u003c/em\u003e inoculated Seed) as compared to control and uninoculated seeds, while uninoculated seeds T5 (0.75 mg CdSO\u003csub\u003e4 \u003c/sub\u003ekg\u003csup\u003e-1\u003c/sup\u003e \u003csub\u003e+\u003c/sub\u003e uninoculated seed)\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp; showed 32 % reduction in number of leaves as compared to control. The result presented in fig1 shows the Cd affected fresh weight of maize plants. However, inoculation of maize seeds with \u003cem\u003eBacillus pumilus\u003c/em\u003e notably enhanced the fresh biomass of maize plant at different concentration of Cd. The maximum (34 %) plant fresh weight was observed in T2 (\u003cem\u003eBacillus pumilus\u003c/em\u003e inoculated seed) as compared to control, while 59% reduction in plant fresh biomass was observed in T5 (0.75 mg CdSO\u003csub\u003e4 \u003c/sub\u003ekg\u003csup\u003e-1\u003c/sup\u003e\u003csub\u003e +\u003c/sub\u003e uninoculated seed) as compared to control.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e3.3 Effect of Cadmium (Cd) on Plant Protein \u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThough a reduction in the protein content was observed in T5 (0.75 mg CdSO\u003csub\u003e4\u003c/sub\u003e kg\u003csup\u003e-1\u003c/sup\u003e\u003csub\u003e +\u003c/sub\u003e uninoculated seed), and T8 (0.75 mg CdSO\u003csub\u003e4 \u003c/sub\u003ekg\u003csup\u003e-1\u003c/sup\u003e \u003csub\u003e+\u003c/sub\u003e inoculated seed) where heavy metals concentration was higher. But, the protein content percentage was significantly higher in T6 (0.25 mg CdSO\u003csub\u003e4 \u003c/sub\u003ekg\u003csup\u003e-1\u003c/sup\u003e \u003csub\u003e+\u003c/sub\u003e inoculated seed) by 60%. However, the lower concentration of Cd in (Cd) T3 (0.25 mg CdSO\u003csub\u003e4 \u003c/sub\u003ekg\u003csup\u003e-1\u003c/sup\u003e\u003csub\u003e +\u003c/sub\u003e uninoculated seed) also triggered the protein content in maize cultivar by 36% compared to control. In the presence of \u003cem\u003eBacillus pumilus\u003c/em\u003e T2 and T7 (0.50 mg CdSO\u003csub\u003e4\u003c/sub\u003e kg\u003csup\u003e-1\u003c/sup\u003e + inoculated seed), showed an increase of 36 and 16% (Fig 2a)\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e3.4 Effect of Cadmium (Cd) on Peroxide dismutase (POD) Enzyme\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eTo scrutinize the effect of various concentrations of Cd, the antioxidant activities (POD and SOD) were determined. Results exhibited that treatment T6 (0.25 mg CdSO\u003csub\u003e4\u003c/sub\u003e kg\u003csup\u003e-1\u003c/sup\u003e + inoculated seed), T5 (0.75 mg CdSO\u003csub\u003e4 \u003c/sub\u003ekg\u003csup\u003e-1\u003c/sup\u003e \u003csub\u003e+\u003c/sub\u003e uninoculated seed), T7 (0.50 mg CdSO\u003csub\u003e4\u003c/sub\u003e kg\u003csup\u003e-1\u003c/sup\u003e + inoculated seed), T8 (0.75 mg CdSO\u003csub\u003e4 \u003c/sub\u003ekg\u003csup\u003e-1\u003c/sup\u003e + inoculated seed), and T3 (0.25 mg CdSO\u003csub\u003e4 \u003c/sub\u003ekg\u003csup\u003e-1\u003c/sup\u003e \u003csub\u003e+ \u003c/sub\u003eun inoculated seed) showed a significant increase of 346, 246, 213, 106 and 106% as compared to control respectively. On the other hand, a reduction of 13% in POD activity was observed in treatment T2 (\u003cem\u003eBacillus pumilus\u003c/em\u003e). (Fig 2b)\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e3.5 Effect of Cadmium (Cd) on Superoxide dismutase (SOD) Enzyme\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe maximum antioxidant (SOD) activity was observed at a higher concentration of Cd specifically in T5 (0.75 mg CdSO\u003csub\u003e4\u003c/sub\u003e kg\u003csup\u003e-1\u003c/sup\u003e + uninoculated Seed). The significant percentage increase of SOD was 769% when compared with control. Likewise, compared with control all other treatments showed a significant increase of SOD enzymatic activity in the presence of \u003cem\u003eBacillus pumilus\u003c/em\u003e in T8 (0.75 mg CdSO\u003csub\u003e4\u003c/sub\u003e kg\u003csup\u003e-1 \u003c/sup\u003e+ inoculated Seed ), T6 0.25 mg CdSO\u003csub\u003e4\u003c/sub\u003e kg\u003csup\u003e-1\u003c/sup\u003e\u003csub\u003e +\u003c/sub\u003e inoculated seed), T7 (0.50 mg CdSO\u003csub\u003e4\u003c/sub\u003e kg\u003csup\u003e-1\u003c/sup\u003e\u003csub\u003e +\u003c/sub\u003e inoculated seed) and in uninoculated treatments, T4 (0.5 mg CdSO\u003csub\u003e4\u003c/sub\u003e kg\u003csup\u003e-1\u003c/sup\u003e + uninoculated Seed), T3 (0.25 mg CdSO\u003csub\u003e4 \u003c/sub\u003ekg\u003csup\u003e-1\u003c/sup\u003e+ uninoculated Seed) by 437, 338, 287, 220, and 125%. While treatment T2 (\u003cem\u003eBacillus pumilus\u003c/em\u003e) showed the least increase with 43% higher than control (T1) (Fig 2c)\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e3.6 Accumulation of Cadmium (Cd) in Maize Roots (mg/g)\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThere was variation in the accumulation of Cd contents in maize roots which was observed in all the treatment as shown in fig. 3a.\u0026nbsp; The maximum 45 % Cd uptake was found in T5 (0.75 mg CdSO0\u003csub\u003e4\u003c/sub\u003e kg\u003csup\u003e-1\u003c/sup\u003e + uninoculated Seed) as compared to control. However, the Cd accumulation was reduced in all treatments when inoculated with \u003cem\u003eBacillus pumilus\u003c/em\u003e as compared to uninoculated seeds. \u0026nbsp;The minimum 21 % Cd contents in maize plant were observed in T6 (0.25 mg CdSO0\u003csub\u003e4\u003c/sub\u003e kg\u003csup\u003e-1\u003c/sup\u003e + inoculated Seed.)\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e3.7 Accumulation of Cadmium (Cd) by Maize Leaves (mg/g)\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe fig. 3b showed variation in\u0026nbsp; Cd contents in maize plant leaves\u0026nbsp; in all the treatment, however the \u0026nbsp;maximum 90 % Cd uptake was found in T5 (0.75 mg CdSO0\u003csub\u003e4 \u003c/sub\u003ekg\u003csup\u003e-1\u003c/sup\u003e + uninoculated Seed)\u0026nbsp; as compared to control. While Cd concentration was reduced in all treatments when inoculated with \u003cem\u003eBacillus pumilus\u003c/em\u003e as compared to control and uninoculated seeds. (The minimum 45 % Cd contents in maize plants observed in T6 (0.25 mg CdSO0\u003csub\u003e4\u003c/sub\u003e kg\u003csup\u003e-1\u003c/sup\u003e + inoculated Seed.)\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eAccumulation of Micro and Macro Nutrients by Maize Plants\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe results presented in table 2 showed Cu content increased in all the treatments when inoculated with \u003cem\u003eBacillus pumilus\u003c/em\u003e as compared to uninoculated plants. The maximum Cu content (10.14C) was observed in T3 and minimum in T5 (0.2D). The Mn content showed variations in inoculated and uninoculated seeds, and maximum content of Mn (7.9A) was recorded in T3 while minimum content of Mn was observed in T7 (1.16D). Inoculation decreases Na content in plant as compared to uninoculated plants. Maximum Na content observed in T3 (6.11A) and minimum was reported in T8 (0.48E) Fe content showed variation in inoculated seeds as compared to uninoculated seeds. Maximum Fe content was reported in T1 (2.89A) while minimum Fe was in T7 (0.54D). Inoculation of \u003cem\u003eBacillus pumilus\u003c/em\u003e increases Ca content in plants while uninoculated plants have low Ca content. Maximum Ca content found in T3 (6.81A) and minimum were found in T8 (0.60E) Mg and K content also showed variation in inoculated and uninoculated plants. Maximum Mg concentration was observed in T2 (1.36A) while minimum concentration was recorded in T5 (0.62D), and maximum K content was noted in T2 (2.72A) and minimum in T8 (o.29D).\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"4. Discussion","content":"\u003cp\u003eThe Cd contaminant adversely affects plants and animals directly and indirectly however, trace amount of Cd in soil did not harm plants. (Jolly et al., 2013). Cd enters into soil in different anthropogenic activities as well as by natural process. Heavy metals present in soil and air remain untreated and enters plant body through dust and moisture contents, which first impacts\u0026nbsp; seeds, and roots of plants, afterwards damages shoots and leaves respectively (N. A. Anjum et al., 2016). It is obvious that germination or growth of plants is increased in inoculated treatments and the growth of maize plant affected by high concentration of Cd, however the effect is minimized by inoculating with \u003cem\u003eBacillus pumilus\u003c/em\u003e. During the present study, the germination was improved with the inoculation of \u003cem\u003eBacillus pumilus\u003c/em\u003e when grown over Cd and these \u0026nbsp;findings are in agreement with (Bauddh \u0026amp; Singh, 2012), who reported that the inoculation of plant seeds with\u0026nbsp; microorganism species like \u003cem\u003ePseudomonas,\u003c/em\u003e \u003cem\u003ePasteurella, Salmonella, Bacillus\u003c/em\u003e and\u003cem\u003e Burkholderia\u003c/em\u003e have the ability to resist. The result finding are also supported by (Anjum et al., 2017), who reported that Cd toxicity has decreased seed germination percentage.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;The removal of heavy metals contaminants from contaminated site, the combined application of plant and microbe is a successful method as compared to the use of plant or bacteria separately (Tara et al., 2019). The higher concentration of lead (Pb) reduces the flower production (Alegbeleye, Opeolu, \u0026amp; Jackson, 2017). In the present study, Cd affected the maize plant in the same way. The higher concentration of Cd can cause plant toxicity\u0026nbsp; and reduction in growth through interference with mineral and\u0026nbsp; Cd absorption,\u0026nbsp; and movement\u0026nbsp; of necessary elements (Karcz \u0026amp; Kurtyka, 2007), The\u0026nbsp; findings\u0026nbsp; of present study\u0026nbsp; are in accordance with these results. The Cd concentration reduced the plant growth and prompted phytochelatin (PC), Cd destructively lowers plant growth because it is non-essential element (Idrus, Basri, Rahim, Abd Rahim, \u0026amp; Chong, 2018). Inoculation of seeds with \u003cem\u003eBacillus pumilus\u003c/em\u003e also enhanced plant growth, this increase in plant length might be due to the production of phytohormones (Ryu \u0026amp; Patten, 2008).\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e(Sandalio, Dalurzo, Gomez, Romero‐Puertas, \u0026amp; Del Rio, 2001) reported that the growth in bacterial inoculated seeds with different Cd concentrations showed significant leaf growth, which showed that bacterial inoculation can promote the tolerant capacity of plants which are in agreement with our findings in which the seed inoculated with\u0026nbsp; \u003cem\u003eBacillus pumilus\u003c/em\u003e showed better leaf growth under Cd stress. Cd transported from soil to all parts of plants tissue, damages the tissues in various ways, so size of contaminated leaf stunted.\u0026nbsp; Likewise (Fu et al., 2010), reported visual symptoms of chlorosis and necrosis in tomato plant when applied up to 25 and 50 \u0026mu;M\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp; of CdCl2. We also got same result when 75mg dose of Cd on maize plant caused wilting in uninoculated treatment but inoculated treatment did not showed these symptoms because \u003cem\u003eBacillus pumilus \u003c/em\u003einhibit toxic symptoms by providing tolerance ability.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRoot is the first organ of plant which is affected by Cd and Cd adversely affects the root length.\u0026nbsp; The study of (Ahmad et al., 2015), showed similar findings which showed decreased root length in\u0026nbsp; the presence of Cd without any inoculation, because Cd destroyed the protein structure however root length showed better growth when inoculated with \u003cem\u003eBacillus pumilus. \u003c/em\u003e(Tam\u0026aacute;s, Fauvet, Christen, \u0026amp; Goloubinoff, 2018) and (Tiryakioglu, Eker, Ozkutlu, Husted, \u0026amp; Cakmak, 2006) also reported that accumulation of Cd in roots of \u003cem\u003eBarlay \u003c/em\u003eplant was 25 % more than stem which inhibited the normal growth of plant root. The effects of heavy metals depend on type of environment and toxic substances uptake by plants. Greater the toxic substance in soil will cause reduction in plants growth. (Barcel\u0026oacute; \u0026amp; Poschenrieder, 2011) also confirmed our finding that in high level of Cd the maize plant showed reduced growth.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe Cd stress in maize plant produce free radicals which damage membrane and cause leakage of electrolyte (Ahmad et al., 2015), therefore number of leaves decreased in Cd stress. (Weryszko‐Chmielewska \u0026amp; Chwil, 2005) reported soybean plant change its physiology as well as morphology like number, shape and size of leaf against Cd is agreement of our present finding in which the inoculation \u003cem\u003eBacillus pumilus \u003c/em\u003esignificantly change the structure of bacterial community which enhance growth as compare to control after 15 days of experiment. (Herschkovitz, Lerner, Davidov, Okon, \u0026amp; Jurkevitch, 2005) confirmed our findings that \u003cem\u003eBacillus pulmilus\u003c/em\u003e promote the tolerance capacity of plants.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIn this study \u003cem\u003eBacillus pumilus\u003c/em\u003e also enhanced plant fresh weight by producing phytohormones like IAA and GA (Shafi, Tian, \u0026amp; Ji, 2017). These hormones increase the plant root and shoot length,, and leaf volume which promote fresh weight of maize plant. The Bacillus species also responsible for bioavailability of macro and micro nutrients from soil (Shahzad et al., 2016) have beneficial effect on plant fresh weight.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRoot secretions have vital function in altering metal bioavailability, these secretions have various compounds that combine with metals and restrict their movement in soil. These rhizo secretions also provide essential elements to microbial communities that enhance their growth and survival ability. Root secretions have different enzymes and protons that make the soil acidic and increase the heavy metal bioavailability (Ma, Oliveira, Freitas, \u0026amp; Zhang, 2016).\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e(Poschenrieder, Cabot, Martos, Gallego, \u0026amp; Barcel\u0026oacute;, 2013) reported that maize plant accumulate Cd in shoots and inhibit the growth of shoot by damaging cell membrane which remove ions from damage site. Cd. Result presented in this experiment shows that Cd uptake by maize plant decrease in all treatments that were inoculated with \u003cem\u003eBacilus pumillus\u003c/em\u003e as compared to control and stressed plants. The reduction in Cd uptake was observed in plants that were inoculated with \u003cem\u003eBacillus pumilus\u003c/em\u003e and highest Cd uptake was observed in uninoculated plants. \u003cem\u003eBacillus pumilus\u003c/em\u003e converts Cd in to unavailable form in soil, and also reduces its toxicity. Previous studies also supported these results that inoculation with \u003cem\u003eBacilus \u003c/em\u003especies reduces Cd bioavailability (Ahemad \u0026amp; Khan, 2012, Choppala et al., 2014, Della Puppa, Kom\u0026aacute;rek, Bordas, Bollinger, \u0026amp; Joussein, 2013).\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe plant possessess a well-organized antioxidant defense system. The accumulation of Cd toxicity was observed in maize cultivar with various treatments with \u003cem\u003eB.pumillus \u003c/em\u003eand without \u003cem\u003eB.pumillus \u003c/em\u003einoculation in order to discern their ability to tolerate different concentration levels of Cd. The present study revealed that antioxidant activities (POD and SOD) stimulated at the higher concentration of Cd. The higher Cd concentrations in maize cause an increase in enzymatic activities because of the activation of enzymes that are already present in plants (Anjum, Ashraf, Khan, Saleem, \u0026amp; Wang, 2016, Guo et al., 2019, Lagriffoul, Mocquot, Mench, \u0026amp; Vangronsveld, 1998, Van Assche \u0026amp; Clijsters, 1990). Comparable changes in the enzymatic activities under different concentrations of heavy metals specifically Cd toxicity have been reported earlier (Ekmek\u0026ccedil;i, Tanyolac, \u0026amp; Ayhan, 2008), (Sun, Zhou, \u0026amp; Diao, 2008). However, some of the studies are in deviation with our results reporting a decrease in SOD activity under the higher concentration of Cd level (Ci, Jiang, Dai, Jing, \u0026amp; Cao, 2009, Lin et al., 2007, Xu et al., 2014). The deviation in results could ensue due to the difference in the time duration of Cd stress applied, the intensity of Cd, and specifically plant stage and cultivar. Moreover, no significant increase was observed in maize plants treated with \u003cem\u003eBacillus pumilus\u003c/em\u003e (Hayat et al., 2020).\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePresent study depicted an increased SOD and POD activity at higher concentrations suggesting that both of these enzymes act simultaneously to avert the formation of OH ions and remove H\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003eO\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003e (Liu, Yuan, Chen, Li, \u0026amp; Liu, 2014, Xu et al., 2014). Therefore, the increased enzymatic (particularly SOD) activity at a higher concentration of Cd is considered a good indication for defensive mechanism stimulation (El Dakak \u0026amp; Hassan, 2020). In addition to this, it was observed in a study that the SOD activity was higher at the lower concentration of Cd in soil (20-25 mg/kg), normal when the concentration ranges between 50-75 mg/kg Cd in the soil and start to decrease when the soil Cd toxicity levels reached to 100 mg/kg (Xu et al., 2014). The decrease in the enzymatic activity perhaps might be attributed to inhibition caused by accelerating H\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003eO\u003csub\u003e2 \u003c/sub\u003e(Aravind \u0026amp; Prasad, 2003, Luo et al., 2015). Thus, heavy metal stress causes an induction of SOD and POD enzymes which in return provides protection and membrane integrity.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIt is a known phenomenon that Cd stress leads to the denaturation of proteins. The present study validated the phenomenon that with the gradual increase in the Cd toxicity level the protein content started to decrease. The results are in agreement with the preceding studies demonstrating the reduction of protein content in maize due to Cd stress (Hussain et al., 2018, P\u0026aacute;l, Lesk\u0026oacute;, Janda, P\u0026aacute;ldi, \u0026amp; Szalai, 2007, Wang \u0026amp; Song, 2009).\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eHeavy metals like aluminum, nickel, lead, and Cd accumulate in root of plants and effect metabolisms of plant by reducing cell elongation and new cell formation (Song et al., 2013) so, plant cannot promote their growth. Similarly in our present study plants treated with Cd showed stunted growth and accumulates maximum Cd in their roots. (Dresler, W\u0026oacute;jcik, Bednarek, Hanaka, \u0026amp; Tukiendorf, 2015) also reported that most plant species like cucumber, rice, maize and etc. hold chief Cd concentration in their roots which reduced the plant growth by disturbing their metabolic activity. Cd. Soil polluted with Cd impacts roots of plants directly which disturb roots to uptake essential nutrients for metabolic activities of plants. However different plant species have tolerance capacity against specific heavy metals (Tsunemitsu et al., 2018).\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Conclusion","content":"\u003cp\u003eIn conclusion, Cd adversely affects the growth of maize (\u003cem\u003eZea mays\u003c/em\u003e) plant, however inoculation of maize seeds with \u003cem\u003eBacillus pumilus\u003c/em\u003e promoted the tolerance to Cd toxicity. The application of \u003cem\u003eBacillus pumilus\u003c/em\u003e (T2) showed significant affect than all other treatments in germination, plant height, leaf length, number of leaves and fresh weight. CdHigher Cd concentration in soil inhibited plant growth, while the inoculation of \u003cem\u003eBacillus pumilus \u003c/em\u003esignificantly reduced the adverse effect of Cd in all the treatments. Treatment T6 was significantly different from all other treatments under Cd stress. Furthermore, the uptake of Cd in maize is decreased in the presence of\u003cem\u003e Bacillus pumilus\u003c/em\u003e in soil which reduced the mobility of Cd leading to less Cd accumulation in maize plant. However 0.75 mg/100 ml of Cd was toxic to maize plant but the inoculation of maize seed with \u003cem\u003eBacillus pumilus\u003c/em\u003e was effective to reduce Cd toxicity and uptake (T5 and T8). The present investigation reveals that \u003cem\u003eBacillus pumilus\u003c/em\u003e inoculation can be used as bio-fertilizer in different level of Cd stress soil.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Declarations","content":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eConflict of Interest:\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe author(s) declare that they do not have any conflict of interest.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"References","content":"\u003col\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAhemad, M., \u0026amp; Khan, M. S. (2012). Evaluation of plant-growth-promoting activities of rhizobacterium Pseudomonas putida under herbicide stress. \u003cem\u003eAnnals of microbiology, 62\u003c/em\u003e(4), 1531-1540.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAhmad, P., Sarwat, M., Bhat, N. A., Wani, M. R., Kazi, A. G., \u0026amp; Tran, L.-S. P. (2015). Alleviation of cadmium toxicity in Brassica juncea L.(Czern. \u0026amp; Coss.) by calcium application involves various physiological and biochemical strategies. \u003cem\u003ePLoS ONE, 10\u003c/em\u003e(1), e0114571.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAhmad, F., Ahmad, I., Khan, M.S., (2008) Screening of free-living rhizospheric bacteria for their ultiple plant growth promoting activities. Microbiological Research 163, 173\u0026ndash;181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micres.2006.04.001.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAlegbeleye, O. O., Opeolu, B. O., \u0026amp; Jackson, V. A. (2017). Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons: a critical review of environmental occurrence and bioremediation. \u003cem\u003eEnvironmental management, 60\u003c/em\u003e(4), 758-783.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAnjum, N. A., Rodrigo, M. A. M., Moulick, A., Heger, Z., Kopel, P., Z\u0026iacute;tka, O., . . . Pereira, E. (2016). Transport phenomena of nanoparticles in plants and animals/humans. \u003cem\u003eEnvironmental Research, 151\u003c/em\u003e, 233-243.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAnjum, S. A., Ashraf, U., Khan, I., Saleem, M. F., \u0026amp; Wang, L. C. (2016). Chromium toxicity induced alterations in growth, photosynthesis, gas exchange attributes and yield formation in maize. \u003cem\u003ePakistan Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 53\u003c/em\u003e(4).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAnjum, S. A., Tanveer, M., Hussain, S., Ashraf, U., Khan, I., \u0026amp; Wang, L. (2017). Alteration in growth, leaf gas exchange, and photosynthetic pigments of maize plants under combined cadmium and arsenic stress. \u003cem\u003eWater, Air, \u0026amp; Soil Pollution, 228\u003c/em\u003e(1), 1-12.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAravind, P., \u0026amp; Prasad, M. N. V. (2003). Zinc alleviates cadmium-induced oxidative stress in Ceratophyllum demersum L.: a free floating freshwater macrophyte. \u003cem\u003ePlant Physiology and Biochemistry, 41\u003c/em\u003e(4), 391-397.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAyangbenro, A. S., \u0026amp; Babalola, O. O. (2017). A new strategy for heavy metal polluted environments: a review of microbial biosorbents. \u003cem\u003eInternational journal of environmental research and public health, 14\u003c/em\u003e(1), 94.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eBadshah, L., Hussain, F., \u0026amp; Sher, Z. (2016). Floristic inventory, ecological characteristics and biological spectrum of plants of Parachinar, Kurram agency, Pakistan. \u003cem\u003ePak. J. Bot, 48\u003c/em\u003e(4), 1547-1558.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eBarcel\u0026oacute;, J., \u0026amp; Poschenrieder, C. (2011). Hyperaccumulation of trace elements: from uptake and tolerance mechanisms to litter decomposition, selenium as an example. \u003cem\u003ePlant and soil, 341\u003c/em\u003e(1), 31-35.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eBates, L. S., Waldren, R. P., \u0026amp; Teare, I. (1973). Rapid determination of free proline for water-stress studies. \u003cem\u003ePlant and soil, 39\u003c/em\u003e(1), 205-207.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eBauddh, K., \u0026amp; Singh, R. P. (2012). Cadmium tolerance and its phytoremediation by two oil yielding plants Ricinus communis (L.) and Brassica juncea (L.) from the contaminated soil. \u003cem\u003eInternational journal of phytoremediation, 14\u003c/em\u003e(8), 772-785.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eBeauchamp, C., \u0026amp; Fridovich, I. (1971). Superoxide dismutase: improved assays and an assay applicable to acrylamide gels. \u003cem\u003eAnalytical biochemistry, 44\u003c/em\u003e(1), 276-287.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eBerendse, F., van Ruijven, J., Jongejans, E., \u0026amp; Keesstra, S. (2015). Loss of plant species diversity reduces soil erosion resistance. \u003cem\u003eEcosystems, 18\u003c/em\u003e(5), 881-888.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eBorsari, M. (2011). Cadmium: coordination chemistry. \u003cem\u003eEncyclopedia of Inorganic and Bioinorganic Chemistry\u003c/em\u003e, 1-16.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eBrunetti, G., Farrag, K., Soler-Rovira, P., Ferrara, M., Nigro, F., and Senesi, N. (2012). The effect of compost and Bacillus licheniformis on the phytoextraction of Cr, Cu, Pb and Zn by three brassicaceae species from contaminated soils in the Apulia region, Southern Italy. Geoderma 170, 322\u0026ndash;330. doi: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2011.11.029\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eChapin, F. S., \u0026amp; Van Cleve, K. (2000). Approaches to studying nutrient uptake, use and loss in plants \u003cem\u003ePlant physiological ecology\u003c/em\u003e (pp. 185-207): Springer.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eCherian, S., Ryu, S. B., \u0026amp; Cornish, K. (2019). Natural rubber biosynthesis in plants, the rubber transferase complex, and metabolic engineering progress and prospects. \u003cem\u003ePlant biotechnology journal, 17\u003c/em\u003e(11), 2041-2061.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eChoppala, G., Saifullah, Bolan, N., Bibi, S., Iqbal, M., Rengel, Z., . . . Ok, Y. S. (2014). Cellular mechanisms in higher plants governing tolerance to cadmium toxicity. \u003cem\u003eCritical reviews in plant sciences, 33\u003c/em\u003e(5), 374-391.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eCi, D., Jiang, D., Dai, T., Jing, Q., \u0026amp; Cao, W. (2009). Effects of cadmium on plant growth and physiological traits in contrast wheat recombinant inbred lines differing in cadmium tolerance. \u003cem\u003eChemosphere, 77\u003c/em\u003e(11), 1620-1625.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eCimrin, K. M., Turan, M., \u0026amp; Kapur, B. (2007). Effect of elemental sulphur on heavy metals solubility and remediation by plants in calcareous soils. \u003cem\u003eFresenius Environmental Bulletin, 16\u003c/em\u003e(9), 1113-1120.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eDas, R., \u0026amp; Jayalekshmy, V. (2015). Mechanism of heavy metal tolerance and improvement of tolerance in crop plants. \u003cem\u003eJ Glob Biosci, 4\u003c/em\u003e(7), 2678-2698.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eDella Puppa, L., Kom\u0026aacute;rek, M., Bordas, F., Bollinger, J.-C., \u0026amp; Joussein, E. (2013). Adsorption of copper, cadmium, lead and zinc onto a synthetic manganese oxide. \u003cem\u003eJournal of colloid and interface science, 399\u003c/em\u003e, 99-106.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eDresler, S., W\u0026oacute;jcik, M., Bednarek, W., Hanaka, A., \u0026amp; Tukiendorf, A. (2015). The effect of silicon on maize growth under cadmium stress. \u003cem\u003eRussian journal of plant physiology, 62\u003c/em\u003e(1), 86-92.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eEkmek\u0026ccedil;i, Y., Tanyolac, D., \u0026amp; Ayhan, B. (2008). Effects of cadmium on antioxidant enzyme and photosynthetic activities in leaves of two maize cultivars. \u003cem\u003eJournal of plant physiology, 165\u003c/em\u003e(6), 600-611.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eEl Dakak, R. A., \u0026amp; Hassan, I. A. (2020). The alleviative effects of salicylic acid on physiological indices and defense mechanisms of maize (Zea Mays L. Giza 2) stressed with cadmium. \u003cem\u003eEnvironmental Processes, 7\u003c/em\u003e(3), 873-884.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eFereidoun, H., Nourddin, M. S., Rreza, N. A., Mohsen, A., Ahmad, R., \u0026amp; Pouria, H. (2007). The effect of long-term exposure to particulate pollution on the lung function of Teheranian and Zanjanian students. \u003cem\u003ePakistan Journal of physiology, 3\u003c/em\u003e(2).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eFu, L.-J., Shi, K., Gu, M., Zhou, Y.-H., Dong, D.-K., Liang, W.-S., . . . Yu, J.-Q. (2010). Systemic induction and role of mitochondrial alternative oxidase and nitric oxide in a compatible tomato\u0026ndash;tobacco mosaic virus interaction. \u003cem\u003eMolecular Plant-Microbe Interactions, 23\u003c/em\u003e(1), 39-48.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eGhoneim, M. M., El-Desoky, H. S., El-Moselhy, K. M., Amer, A., Abou El-Naga, E. H., Mohamedein, L. I., \u0026amp; Al-Prol, A. E. (2014). Removal of cadmium from aqueous solution using marine green algae, Ulva lactuca. \u003cem\u003eThe Egyptian Journal of Aquatic Research, 40\u003c/em\u003e(3), 235-242.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eGururani, M. A., Upadhyaya, C. P., Baskar, V., Venkatesh, J., Nookaraju, A., and Park, S. W. (2013). Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria enhance abiotic stress tolerance in Solanum tuberosum through inducing changes in the expression of ROS-scavenging enzymes and improved photosynthetic performance. Journal of Plant Growth and Regulation 32, 245\u0026ndash;258. doi: 10.1007/s00344-012-9292-6\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eGuo, J., Qin, S., Rengel, Z., Gao, W., Nie, Z., Liu, H., . . . Zhao, P. (2019). Cadmium stress increases antioxidant enzyme activities and decreases endogenous hormone concentrations more in Cd-tolerant than Cd-sensitive wheat varieties. \u003cem\u003eEcotoxicology and environmental safety, 172\u003c/em\u003e, 380-387.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHayat, K., Menhas, S., Bundschuh, J., Zhou, P., Niazi, N. K., Amna, . . . Wang, J. (2020). Plant growth promotion and enhanced uptake of Cd by combinatorial application of Bacillus pumilus and EDTA on Zea mays L. \u003cem\u003eInternational Journal of Phytoremediation, 22\u003c/em\u003e(13), 1372-1384.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHerschkovitz, Y., Lerner, A., Davidov, Y., Okon, Y., \u0026amp; Jurkevitch, E. (2005). Azospirillum brasilense does not affect population structure of specific rhizobacterial communities of inoculated maize (Zea mays). \u003cem\u003eEnvironmental microbiology, 7\u003c/em\u003e(11), 1847-1852.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHussain, A., Ali, S., Rizwan, M., ur Rehman, M. Z., Javed, M. R., Imran, M., . . . Nazir, R. (2018). Zinc oxide nanoparticles alter the wheat physiological response and reduce the cadmium uptake by plants. \u003cem\u003eEnvironmental Pollution, 242\u003c/em\u003e, 1518-1526.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eIdrus, F. A., Basri, M. M., Rahim, K. A. A., Abd Rahim, N. S., \u0026amp; Chong, M. D. (2018). Concentrations of cadmium, copper, and zinc in Macrobrachium rosenbergii (giant freshwater prawn) from natural environment. \u003cem\u003eBulletin of environmental contamination and toxicology, 100\u003c/em\u003e(3), 350-355.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eIncrocci, L., Massa, D., Pardossi, A., Bacci, L., Battista, P., Rapi, B., \u0026amp; Romani, M. (2010). \u003cem\u003eA decision support system to optimise fertigation management in greenhouse crops.\u003c/em\u003e Paper presented at the XXVIII International Horticultural Congress on Science and Horticulture for People (IHC2010): International Symposium on 927.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eJamil, M., Zeb, S., Anees, M., Roohi, A., Ahmed, I., ur-Rehman, S., et al. (2014). Role of Bacillus licheniformis in phytoremediation of nickel contaminated soil cultivated with rice. International Journal of Phytoremediation 16, 554\u0026ndash;571. doi: 10.1080/15226514.2013.798621\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eJean, L., Bordas, F., Gautier-Moussard, C., Vernay, P., Hitmi, A., \u0026amp; Bollinger, J.-C. (2008). Effect of citric acid and EDTA on chromium and nickel uptake and translocation by Datura innoxia. \u003cem\u003eEnvironmental Pollution, 153\u003c/em\u003e(3), 555-563.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eJolly, Y. N., Islam, A., \u0026amp; Akbar, S. (2013). Transfer of metals from soil to vegetables and possible health risk assessment. \u003cem\u003eSpringerPlus, 2\u003c/em\u003e(1), 1-8.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eKarcz, W., \u0026amp; Kurtyka, R. (2007). Effect of cadmium on growth, proton extrusion and membrane potential in maize coleoptile segments. \u003cem\u003eBiologia Plantarum, 51\u003c/em\u003e(4), 713.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eKarigar, C. S., \u0026amp; Rao, S. S. (2011). Role of microbial enzymes in the bioremediation of pollutants: a review. \u003cem\u003eEnzyme research, 2011\u003c/em\u003e.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eLagriffoul, A., Mocquot, B., Mench, M., \u0026amp; Vangronsveld, J. (1998). Cadmium toxicity effects on growth, mineral and chlorophyll contents, and activities of stress related enzymes in young maize plants (Zea mays L.). \u003cem\u003ePlant and soil, 200\u003c/em\u003e(2), 241-250.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eLee, S.W., Lee, S.H., Balaraju, K., Park, K.S., Nam, K.W., Park, J.W., Park, K., (2014) Growth promotion and induced disease suppression of four vegetable crops by a selected plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) strain Bacillus subtilis 21-1 under two different soil conditions. Acta Physiolgia Plant. 36, 1353\u0026ndash;1362. https://doi. org/10.1007/s11738-014-1514-z.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eLin, R., Wang, X., Luo, Y., Du, W., Guo, H., \u0026amp; Yin, D. (2007). Effects of soil cadmium on growth, oxidative stress and antioxidant system in wheat seedlings (Triticum aestivum L.). \u003cem\u003eChemosphere, 69\u003c/em\u003e(1), 89-98.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eLindsey III, B. E., Rivero, L., Calhoun, C. S., Grotewold, E., \u0026amp; Brkljacic, J. (2017). Standardized method for high-throughput sterilization of Arabidopsis seeds. \u003cem\u003eJoVE (Journal of Visualized Experiments)\u003c/em\u003e(128), e56587.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eLiu, K., Yuan, C., Chen, Y., Li, H., \u0026amp; Liu, J. (2014). Combined effects of ascorbic acid and chitosan on the quality maintenance and shelf life of plums. \u003cem\u003eScientia Horticulturae, 176\u003c/em\u003e, 45-53.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eLuo, X.-S., Xue, Y., Wang, Y.-L., Cang, L., Xu, B., \u0026amp; Ding, J. (2015). Source identification and apportionment of heavy metals in urban soil profiles. \u003cem\u003eChemosphere, 127\u003c/em\u003e, 152-157.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eMa, Y., Oliveira, R. S., Freitas, H., \u0026amp; Zhang, C. (2016). Biochemical and molecular mechanisms of plant-microbe-metal interactions: relevance for phytoremediation. \u003cem\u003eFrontiers in plant science, 7\u003c/em\u003e, 918.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eMansoor, S., Kour, N., Manhas, S., Zahid, S., Wani, O. A., Sharma, V., . . . El-Serehy, H. A. (2020). Biochar as a Tool for Effective Management of Drought and Heavy Metal Toxicity. \u003cem\u003eChemosphere\u003c/em\u003e, 129458.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eMo, Y., Wang, Y., Yang, R., Zheng, J., Liu, C., Li, H., . . . Zhang, X. (2016). Regulation of plant growth, photosynthesis, antioxidation and osmosis by an arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus in watermelon seedlings under well-watered and drought conditions. \u003cem\u003eFrontiers in Plant Science, 7\u003c/em\u003e, 644.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eOpeolu, B. O., Bamgbose, O., Arowolo, T., \u0026amp; Adetunji, M. (2011). Utilisation of biomaterials as adsorbents for heavy metals\u0026rsquo; removal from aqueous matrices.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003ePandey, S., Ghosh, P. K., Ghosh, S., De, T. K., and Maiti, T. K. (2013). Role of heavy metal resistant Ochrobactrum sp. and Bacillus spp. strains in bioremediation of a rice cultivar and their PGPR like activities. Journal of Microbiology 51, 11\u0026ndash;17. doi: 10.1007/s12275-013-2330-7\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eP\u0026aacute;l, M., Lesk\u0026oacute;, K., Janda, T., P\u0026aacute;ldi, E., \u0026amp; Szalai, G. (2007). Cadmium-induced changes in the membrane lipid composition of maize plants. \u003cem\u003eCereal Research Communications, 35\u003c/em\u003e(4), 1631-1642.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003ePan, F., Meng, Q., Luo, S., Shen, J., Chen, B., Khan, K. Y., . . . Feng, Y. (2017). Enhanced Cd extraction of oilseed rape (Brassica napus) by plant growth-promoting bacteria isolated from Cd hyperaccumulator Sedum alfredii Hance. \u003cem\u003eInternational journal of phytoremediation, 19\u003c/em\u003e(3), 281-289.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003ePathania, D., \u0026amp; Srivastava, A. (2020). Advances in nanoparticles tailored lignocellulosic biochars for removal of heavy metals with special reference to cadmium (II) and chromium (VI). \u003cem\u003eEnvironmental Sustainability\u003c/em\u003e, 1-14.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003ePoschenrieder, C., Cabot, C., Martos, S., Gallego, B., \u0026amp; Barcel\u0026oacute;, J. (2013). Do toxic ions induce hormesis in plants? \u003cem\u003ePlant science, 212\u003c/em\u003e, 15-25.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eRahman, Z., \u0026amp; Singh, V. P. (2019). The relative impact of toxic heavy metals (THMs)(arsenic (As), cadmium (Cd), chromium (Cr)(VI), mercury (Hg), and lead (Pb)) on the total environment: an overview. \u003cem\u003eEnvironmental monitoring and assessment, 191\u003c/em\u003e(7), 1-21.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eRai, A., Fulekar, J., \u0026amp; Fulekar, M. (2020). Rhizospheric Microorganisms for the Remediation of Contaminants for Ecological Restoration \u003cem\u003ePlant Microbiome Paradigm\u003c/em\u003e (pp. 163-174): Springer.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eRyu, R. J., \u0026amp; Patten, C. L. (2008). Aromatic amino acid-dependent expression of indole-3-pyruvate decarboxylase is regulated by TyrR in Enterobacter cloacae UW5. \u003cem\u003eJournal of bacteriology, 190\u003c/em\u003e(21), 7200-7208.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSandalio, L., Dalurzo, H., Gomez, M., Romero‐Puertas, M., \u0026amp; Del Rio, L. (2001). Cadmium‐induced changes in the growth and oxidative metabolism of pea plants. \u003cem\u003eJournal of experimental botany, 52\u003c/em\u003e(364), 2115-2126.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSayari, A., Hamoudi, S., \u0026amp; Yang, Y. (2005). Applications of pore-expanded mesoporous silica. 1. Removal of heavy metal cations and organic pollutants from wastewater. \u003cem\u003eChemistry of materials, 17\u003c/em\u003e(1), 212-216.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eShabir, R., Abbas, G., Saqib, M., Shahid, M., Shah, G. M., Akram, M., . . . Ashraf, F. (2018). Cadmium tolerance and phytoremediation potential of acacia (Acacia nilotica L.) under salinity stress. \u003cem\u003eInternational journal of phytoremediation, 20\u003c/em\u003e(7), 739-746.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eShafi, J., Tian, H., \u0026amp; Ji, M. (2017). Bacillus species as versatile weapons for plant pathogens: a review. \u003cem\u003eBiotechnology \u0026amp; Biotechnological Equipment, 31\u003c/em\u003e(3), 446-459.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eShahzad, R., Waqas, M., Khan, A. L., Asaf, S., Khan, M. A., Kang, S.-M., . . . Lee, I.-J. (2016). Seed-borne endophytic Bacillus amyloliquefaciens RWL-1 produces gibberellins and regulates endogenous phytohormones of Oryza sativa. \u003cem\u003ePlant Physiology and Biochemistry, 106\u003c/em\u003e, 236-243.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSirajuddin, Khan, A., Ali, L., Chaudhary, H.J., Munis, M.F.H., Bano, A., Masood, S., 2016. Bacillus pumilus alleviates boron toxicity in tomato (Lycopersicum esculentum L.) due to enhanced antioxidant enzymatic activity. Science and Horticulture 200, 178\u0026ndash;185. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.scienta.2016.01.024.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSong, X.-Q., Liu, L.-F., Jiang, Y.-J., Zhang, B.-C., Gao, Y.-P., Liu, X.-L., . . . Zhou, Y.-H. (2013). Disruption of secondary wall cellulose biosynthesis alters cadmium translocation and tolerance in rice plants. \u003cem\u003eMolecular plant, 6\u003c/em\u003e(3), 768-780.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSun, Y., Zhou, Q., \u0026amp; Diao, C. (2008). Effects of cadmium and arsenic on growth and metal accumulation of Cd-hyperaccumulator Solanum nigrum L. \u003cem\u003eBioresource Technology, 99\u003c/em\u003e(5), 1103-1110.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eTam\u0026aacute;s, M. J., Fauvet, B., Christen, P., \u0026amp; Goloubinoff, P. (2018). Misfolding and aggregation of nascent proteins: a novel mode of toxic cadmium action in vivo. \u003cem\u003eCurrent genetics, 64\u003c/em\u003e(1), 177-181.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eTara, N., Arslan, M., Hussain, Z., Iqbal, M., Khan, Q. M., \u0026amp; Afzal, M. (2019). On-site performance of floating treatment wetland macrocosms augmented with dye-degrading bacteria for the remediation of textile industry wastewater. \u003cem\u003eJournal of cleaner production, 217\u003c/em\u003e, 541-548.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eTiryakioglu, M., Eker, S., Ozkutlu, F., Husted, S., \u0026amp; Cakmak, I. (2006). Antioxidant defense system and cadmium uptake in barley genotypes differing in cadmium tolerance. \u003cem\u003eJournal of Trace Elements in Medicine and Biology, 20\u003c/em\u003e(3), 181-189.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eTruyens, S., Weyens, N., Cuypers, A., \u0026amp; Vangronsveld, J. (2015). Bacterial seed endophytes: genera, vertical transmission and interaction with plants. \u003cem\u003eEnvironmental Microbiology Reports, 7\u003c/em\u003e(1), 40-50.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eTsunemitsu, Y., Genga, M., Okada, T., Yamaji, N., Ma, J. F., Miyazaki, A., . . . Ueno, D. (2018). A member of cation diffusion facilitator family, MTP11, is required for manganese tolerance and high fertility in rice. \u003cem\u003ePlanta, 248\u003c/em\u003e(1), 231-241.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eVan Assche, F., Cardinaels, C., \u0026amp; Clijsters, H. (1988). Induction of enzyme capacity in plants as a result of heavy metal toxicity: Dose-response relations in Phaseolus vulgaris L., treated with zinc and cadmium. \u003cem\u003eEnvironmental pollution, 52\u003c/em\u003e(2), 103-115.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eVan Assche, F., \u0026amp; Clijsters, H. (1990). Effects of metals on enzyme activity in plants. \u003cem\u003ePlant, Cell \u0026amp; Environment, 13\u003c/em\u003e(3), 195-206.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eVenu, V., Jothimani, P., Krishnamoorthy, S., Prasanthrajan, M., \u0026amp; Kalpana, P. (2019). Characterization of heavy metal contamination in mulberry cultivated soils of Erode district in Tamil Nadu. \u003cem\u003eJournal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry, 8\u003c/em\u003e(3), 730-733.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eVernay, P., Gauthier-Moussard, C., Jean, L., Bordas, F., Faure, O., Ledoigt, G., \u0026amp; Hitmi, A. (2008). Effect of chromium species on phytochemical and physiological parameters in Datura innoxia. \u003cem\u003eChemosphere, 72\u003c/em\u003e(5), 763-771.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eVinita, S., Vartika, G., Kameshwar, S., Sonal, B., Reeta, K., \u0026amp; Neeti, D. (2013). Potential Application of antioxidants. \u003cem\u003eJournal of Pharmacy Research, 7\u003c/em\u003e(9), 828-835.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWang, C. Q., \u0026amp; Song, H. (2009). Calcium protects Trifolium repens L. seedlings against cadmium stress. \u003cem\u003ePlant cell reports, 28\u003c/em\u003e(9), 1341-1349.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWeryszko‐Chmielewska, E., \u0026amp; Chwil, M. (2005). Lead‐Induced Histological and Ultrastructural Changes in the Leaves of Soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.). \u003cem\u003eSoil Science \u0026amp; Plant Nutrition, 51\u003c/em\u003e(2), 203-212.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eXu, D., Zhao, Y., Sun, K., Gao, B., Wang, Z., Jin, J., . . . Liu, X. (2014). Cadmium adsorption on plant-and manure-derived biochar and biochar-amended sandy soils: impact of bulk and surface properties. \u003cem\u003eChemosphere, 111\u003c/em\u003e, 320-326.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ol\u003e"},{"header":"Tables","content":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eTab. 1. \u003c/strong\u003ePreparation Of Treatment Applications\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ctable border=\"1\"\u003e\n\u003ctbody\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"42\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"171\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eTreatments\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"213\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eBacillus pumilus \u003c/em\u003einoculation\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"138\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eCdSO4 (mg kg\u003csup\u003e-1\u003c/sup\u003e)\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"75\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003c/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"42\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"171\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eT1\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"213\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e-\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"138\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e0\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"75\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003c/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"42\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"171\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eT2\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"213\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e+\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"138\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e0\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"75\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003c/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"42\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"171\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eT3\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"213\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e+\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"138\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e0.25\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"75\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003c/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"42\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"171\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eT4\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"213\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e+\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"138\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e0.50\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"75\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003c/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"42\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"171\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eT5\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"213\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e+\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"138\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e0.75\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"75\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003c/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"42\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"171\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eT6\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"213\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e-\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"138\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e0.25\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"75\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003c/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"42\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"171\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eT7\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"213\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e-\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"138\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e0.50\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"75\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003c/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"42\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"171\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eT8\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"213\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e-\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"138\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e0.75\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"75\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003c/tr\u003e\n\u003c/tbody\u003e\n\u003c/table\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eTable \u003c/strong\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e2. \u003c/strong\u003eAccumulation of Micro and Macro Nutrients by Maize Plants\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ctable border=\"1\" width=\"0\"\u003e\n\u003ctbody\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd rowspan=\"2\" width=\"85\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eNutrients \u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd colspan=\"8\" width=\"911\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eNutrient concentration\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003c/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"97\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eT1\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"101\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eT2\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"113\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eT3\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"125\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eT4\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"114\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eT5\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"141\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eT6\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"107\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eT7\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"113\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eT8\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003c/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"85\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCu\u0026nbsp; (mg/g)\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"97\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e4.33\u0026plusmn;0.0.35C\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"101\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e6.84\u0026plusmn;0.171B\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"113\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e4.33\u0026plusmn;0.37C\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"125\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e2.66\u0026plusmn;0.151D\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"114\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e1.98\u0026plusmn; 0.13BD\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"141\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e2.66\u0026plusmn;0.29CD\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"107\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e2.37\u0026plusmn;0.28D\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"113\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e2.04\u0026plusmn;0.26D\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003c/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"85\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eMn (mg/g)\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"97\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e3.28\u0026plusmn;0.016C\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"101\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e6.40\u0026plusmn;0.26B\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"113\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e10.47\u0026plusmn;0.22A\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"125\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e3.33\u0026plusmn;0.07C\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"114\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e1.78\u0026plusmn;0.07BD\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"141\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e1.62\u0026plusmn;0.18D\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"107\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e1.16\u0026plusmn;0.04D\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"113\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e1.62\u0026plusmn;0.21D\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003c/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"85\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eNa\u0026nbsp; (g/Kg)\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"97\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e1.57\u0026plusmn;0.03D\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"101\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e5.13\u0026plusmn;0.18B\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"113\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e6.11\u0026plusmn;1.21A\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"125\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e2.56\u0026plusmn;0.19C\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"114\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e2.27\u0026plusmn;0.17C\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"141\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e0.90\u0026plusmn;0.04E\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"107\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e0.896\u0026plusmn;3.03E\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"113\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e0.49\u0026plusmn;0.5E\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003c/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"85\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eK ( mg/g)\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"97\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e2.62\u0026plusmn;0.14A\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"101\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e2.72\u0026plusmn;0.15A\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"113\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e1.44\u0026plusmn;0.03B\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"125\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e1.03\u0026plusmn;0.01BC\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"114\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e0.38\u0026plusmn;0.01D\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"141\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e0.41\u0026plusmn;0.02D\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"107\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e0.83\u0026plusmn;0.22CD\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"113\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e0.29\u0026plusmn;0.02 D\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003c/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"85\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eFe\u0026nbsp; (mg/g)\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"97\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e2.89\u0026plusmn;0.24A\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"101\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e1.65\u0026plusmn;0.15BC\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"113\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e1.41\u0026plusmn;0.15BCD\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"125\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e0.70\u0026plusmn;0.14BCD\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"114\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e1.15\u0026plusmn;2.26BCD\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"141\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e2.04\u0026plusmn;8.23AB\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"107\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e0.54\u0026plusmn;1.19D\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"113\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e1.29\u0026plusmn;0.20BCD\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003c/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"85\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCa\u0026nbsp; (g/Kg)\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"97\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e1.68\u0026plusmn;0.12D\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"101\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e4.53\u0026plusmn;0.14B\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"113\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e6.81\u0026plusmn;0.13A\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"125\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e5.26\u0026plusmn;0.020B\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"114\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e2.49\u0026plusmn;0.13C\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"141\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e2.36\u0026plusmn;0.19DCD\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"107\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e2.47\u0026plusmn;0.20C\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"113\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eO6.07\u0026plusmn;0.14E\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003c/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"85\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eMg (g/Kg)\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"97\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e1.18\u0026plusmn;0.01AB\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"101\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e1.36\u0026plusmn;0.142A\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"113\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e0.75\u0026plusmn;0.13BCD\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"125\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e1.11.\u0026plusmn;0.020ABC\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"114\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eO.62\u0026plusmn;0.019CD\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"141\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e1.066\u0026plusmn;0.020ABCD\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"107\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e0,56\u0026plusmn;0.0135D\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd width=\"113\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e0.66\u0026plusmn;0.54CD\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003c/tr\u003e\n\u003c/tbody\u003e\n\u003c/table\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAll treatments sharing common letter are similar otherwise differ significantly at p\u0026lt;0.05\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eT1= control, T2= inoculated seed, T3= 0.25mg CdSO\u003csub\u003e4\u003c/sub\u003e 100mL \u003csup\u003e-1\u003c/sup\u003e+ uninoculated seed, T4= 0.50mg CdSO\u003csub\u003e4\u003c/sub\u003e 100mL \u003csup\u003e-1\u003c/sup\u003e+ uninoculated seed, T5= 0.75mg CdSO\u003csub\u003e4\u003c/sub\u003e 100mL \u003csup\u003e-1\u003c/sup\u003e+ uninoculated seed, T6= 0.25mg CdSO\u003csub\u003e4\u003c/sub\u003e 100mL \u003csup\u003e-1\u003c/sup\u003e, + Inoculated seed, T7= 0. CdSO\u003csub\u003e4\u003c/sub\u003e 100mL \u003csup\u003e-1\u003c/sup\u003e+ Inoculated seed, T8= 0.75mg CdSO\u003csub\u003e4\u003c/sub\u003e 100mL \u003csup\u003e-1\u003c/sup\u003e+ Inoculated seed\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e"}],"fulltextSource":"","fullText":"","funders":[],"hasAdminPriorityOnWorkflow":false,"hasManuscriptDocX":true,"hasOptedInToPreprint":true,"hasPassedJournalQc":"","hasAnyPriority":false,"hideJournal":false,"highlight":"","institution":"","isAcceptedByJournal":true,"isAuthorSuppliedPdf":false,"isDeskRejected":"","isHiddenFromSearch":false,"isInQc":false,"isInWorkflow":false,"isPdf":false,"isPdfUpToDate":true,"isWithdrawnOrRetracted":false,"journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"scientific-reports","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"externalIdentity":"scirep","sideBox":"Learn more about [Scientific Reports](http://www.nature.com/srep/)","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"","title":"Scientific Reports","twitterHandle":"","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":true,"editorialSystem":"stoa","reportingPortfolio":"Scientific Reports","inReviewEnabled":true,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true},"keywords":"Bacillus pumilus, Cadmium (Cd), maize, heavy metals, bioremediation, plant microbial interaction. ","lastPublishedDoi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-567788/v1","lastPublishedDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-567788/v1","license":{"name":"CC BY 4.0","url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"manuscriptAbstract":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003ePurpose:\u003c/strong\u003e Heavy metals contaminate the soil that alters the properties of soil and negatively affect plants growth. Using microorganism and plant can remove these pollutants from soil.\u0026nbsp;The present investigation was designed to evaluate the induced effect of \u003cem\u003eBacillus pumilus\u003c/em\u003e on maize plant in Cadmium (Cd) contaminated soil. \u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eMethods:\u003c/strong\u003e Three different concentrations of Cd (i.e. 0.25, 0.50 and 0.75 mg kg\u003csup\u003e-1\u003c/sup\u003e) were applied in soil under which maize plants were grown. The germination percentage, shoot length, leaf length, number of leaves, root length,fresh weight and nutrient uptake by maize plant were determined. The experiment was conducted by using complete randomized design (CRD) with three replicates. \u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eResults:\u003c/strong\u003e The result indicated that germination percentage, Shoot length, leaf length, root length, number of leaves, and plant fresh weight were reduced by 37, 39, 39, 32 and 59% respectively at 0.75mg kg\u003csup\u003e-1 \u003c/sup\u003eof CdSO\u003csub\u003e4\u003c/sub\u003econcentration but when maize seeds inoculated with \u003cem\u003eBacillus pumilus\u003c/em\u003e significantly increased the germination percentage, shoot length, leaf length, number of leaves, plant fresh weight at different concentrations of CdSO\u003csub\u003e4\u003c/sub\u003e. \u0026nbsp;Moreover, the plant protein were significantly increased by 60% in T6 (0.25 mg kg\u003csup\u003e-1 \u003c/sup\u003eof CdSO\u003csub\u003e4\u003c/sub\u003e+inoculated seed) and Peroxidase dismutase (POD) was also significantly higher by 346% in T6 (0.25 mg kg\u003csup\u003e-1 \u003c/sup\u003eof CdSO\u003csub\u003e4\u003c/sub\u003e+inoculated seed), however, the Superoxide dismutase (SOD) was significantly higher in T5 (0.75 mg kg\u003csup\u003e-1 \u003c/sup\u003eof CdSO\u003csub\u003e4\u003c/sub\u003e+ uninoculated seed) and was 769% higher as compared to control. The Cd contents in\u003cem\u003e Bacillus pumilus\u003c/em\u003e inoculated maize roots and shoots were decreased. \u003cstrong\u003eConclusion:\u003c/strong\u003e The present investigations indicated that the inoculation of maize plant with \u003cem\u003eBacillus pumilus\u003c/em\u003e can help maize plants to withstand Cd stress but higher concentration of Cd can harm the plant. The \u003cem\u003eBacillus pumilus\u003c/em\u003e has good potential to remediate Cd from soil, and also have potential to reduce the phytoavailibility and toxicity of Cd.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e","manuscriptTitle":"Bacillus Pumilus Induced Tolerance of Maize (Zea Mays L.) Against Cadmium (Cd) Stress","msid":"","msnumber":"","nonDraftVersions":[{"code":1,"date":"2021-06-04 19:38:06","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-567788/v1","editorialEvents":[{"type":"communityComments","content":0},{"type":"decision","content":"Major revision","date":"2021-07-07T05:40:29+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"editorInvitedReview","content":"","date":"2021-06-25T07:24:28+00:00","index":"hide","fulltext":""},{"type":"reviewerAgreed","content":"b3b3c806-8326-460f-990b-6031ba21093f","date":"2021-06-25T03:47:02+00:00","index":"hide","fulltext":""},{"type":"reviewerAgreed","content":"bf0e400b-b927-4f81-bf2d-ab2074f31f9d","date":"2021-06-15T01:26:48+00:00","index":"hide","fulltext":""},{"type":"reviewersInvited","content":"","date":"2021-06-01T02:22:33+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"editorAssigned","content":"","date":"2021-06-01T00:42:33+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"editorInvited","content":"","date":"2021-05-31T11:09:40+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"checksComplete","content":"","date":"2021-05-28T16:44:41+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"submitted","content":"Scientific Reports","date":"2021-05-27T15:27:27+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""}],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"scientific-reports","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"externalIdentity":"scirep","sideBox":"Learn more about [Scientific Reports](http://www.nature.com/srep/)","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"","title":"Scientific Reports","twitterHandle":"","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":true,"editorialSystem":"stoa","reportingPortfolio":"Scientific Reports","inReviewEnabled":true,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true}}],"origin":"","ownerIdentity":"fa097d35-f38d-43be-b7f3-a2c41b5254ca","owner":[],"postedDate":"June 4th, 2021","published":true,"recentEditorialEvents":[],"rejectedJournal":[],"revision":"","amendment":"","status":"under-review","subjectAreas":[{"id":4790207,"name":"General Microbiology"},{"id":4790208,"name":"Plant Molecular Biology and Genetics"},{"id":4790209,"name":"General Cell Biology \u0026 Physiology"}],"tags":[],"updatedAt":"2021-07-19T05:44:14+00:00","versionOfRecord":[],"versionCreatedAt":"2021-06-04 19:38:06","video":"","vorDoi":"","vorDoiUrl":"","workflowStages":[]},"version":"v1","identity":"rs-567788","journalConfig":"researchsquare"},"__N_SSP":true},"page":"/article/[identity]/[[...version]]","query":{"redirect":"/article/rs-567788","identity":"rs-567788","version":["v1"]},"buildId":"ApUGefWb6u5IBVtyqm6d5","isFallback":false,"isExperimentalCompile":false,"dynamicIds":[84888],"gssp":true,"scriptLoader":[]}