Adherence to COVID-19 Preventive Measures Prior to Vaccine Interventions: A Meta-Analysis of Online Surveys in Sub-Saharan Africa
preprint
OA: closed
Abstract
Background: Little is known regarding the observance of the non-pharmaceutical measures implemented to curtail COVID-19 transmission in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). Recent deployment of COVID-19 vaccines may lead to a neglect of these still needed non-pharmaceutical strategies. We investigated adherence to preventive measures during the initial six months of the COVID-19 outbreak in SSA.Methods: Between March and August 2020, online surveys were conducted in six SSA countries: Benin, Cameroon, Democratic Republic of Congo, Mozambique, Somalia and Uganda. A five-point individual adherence score was constituted by scoring respondents’ observance of the following: mask use, physical distancing, hand hygiene, coughing hygiene, and avoiding to touch one’s face. To take into account community preventive measures, we also proposed a modified adherence score. Data was analysed in two time periods: Period 1 (March-May) and Period 2 (June-August).Findings: Responses from 26,678 respondents were analysed (mean age: 31.0±11.1y; 54.1% males). Mean individual adherence score decreased from 3.80±1.37 during Period 1, to 3.57±1.43 during Period 2; p<0.001. Modified adherence scores showed a negative relationship with the prevalence of suspected COVID-19 among the respondents, although non-significant statistically (p=0.307). Predictors of increased individual adherence included: higher age (Coef=0.005; 95% CI: 0.003-0.007), female gender (Coef=0.071; 95% CI: 0.039-0.104), higher educational level (Coef=0.999; 95% CI: 0.885-1.113) and working in the healthcare sector (Coef=0.418; 95% CI: 0.380-0.456).Interpretation: Despite the advent of vaccines, decreasing adherence to non-pharmaceutical measures still constitute a risk for COVID-19 resurgence in SSA. Younger persons and those with lower education levels are target groups for improving adherence.Funding Information: The establishment of the ICPCovid website to conduct the surveys was supported by a grant from the European Research Council (ERC 671055). No funding source supported the drafting and dissemination of this meta-analysis.Declaration of Interests: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.Ethics Approval Statement: This ICPCovid surveys were approved by the Ethics Committee of the University of Antwerp, Belgium (Ref: 20/13/148), and national ethical committees in each participating country (see Author Statements for details). Only data from participants aged 18 years and above who provided an e-consent were retained for analysis. All data were collected anonymously and treated with absolute confidentiality.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-05-19T01:45:01.086888+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-06-13T06:42:57.164913+00:00