Exploration of targeted electrophilic kinase probes identifies a covalent ULK1 degrader

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

Kinases have proven to be one of the most fertile target classes for new drug approvals. However, classical reversible inhibitors may not be capable of the levels of specificity or target modulation required across a broad spectrum of disease areas. Approaches that chemically modify kinase inhibitors in solvent exposed regions are unveiling a swathe of mechanisms to address kinase function in new ways. For example, by either covalently recruiting nucleophilic residues outside of the ATP-binding pocket to inhibit, or by recruiting secondary effector proteins to degrade. Here, we systematically assessed the impact of minimal electrophilic modifications to ATP-site binding scaffolds, leading us to identify molecules that can control the activity and abundance of the master autophagy regulator, Unc-51-like autophagy activating kinase 1 (ULK1).
Full text 938 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract Kinases have proven to be one of the most fertile target classes for new drug approvals. However, classical reversible inhibitors may not be capable of the levels of specificity or target modulation required across a broad spectrum of disease areas. Approaches that chemically modify kinase inhibitors in solvent exposed regions are unveiling a swathe of mechanisms to address kinase function in new ways. For example, by either covalently recruiting nucleophilic residues outside of the ATP-binding pocket to inhibit, or by recruiting secondary effector proteins to degrade. Here, we systematically assessed the impact of minimal electrophilic modifications to ATP-site binding scaffolds, leading us to identify molecules that can control the activity and abundance of the master autophagy regulator, Unc-51-like autophagy activating kinase 1 (ULK1). Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00