Does the COVID-19 Pandemic Signal the End of Globalisation or Will it Usher in a New Era of Re-Globalisation?
preprint
OA: closed
Abstract
In the article, first I define the term ‘globalisation’ and its characteristics. The current ‘globalisation’ is mainly emerged after the cold-war. The globalisation process was driven by the liberal-western ideals. United States and United Kingdom were the main catalysts of the current (neo)liberal order. In the article I am using the term ‘anglophonic-globalisation’ to refer the current globalisation. Because it is the anglophone nations dominated the post-cold war globalisation process. This includes nations such as United States, United Kingdom, Canada, Australia and New Zealand. The anglophonic-globalisations mainly driven by the philosophy of capitalism and (neo)liberalism. The key four characterizations of the anglophonic-globalisation are, to internationalize, to liberalize, to universalize and to westernize the global relations1. The second part of article deals with re-globalisation. In the article I argue that, pandemic is not going to end the globalisation, but it will lead to re-globalisation.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-05-19T01:45:01.086888+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-06-13T06:42:57.164913+00:00