Transitions in lung microbiota landscape associate with distinct patterns of pneumonia progression

SUMMARY The precise microbial determinants driving clinical outcomes in severe pneumonia are unknown. Competing ecological forces produce dynamic microbiota states in health; infection and treatment effects on microbiota state must be defined to improve pneumonia therapy. Here, we leverage our unique clinical setting, which includes systematic and serial bronchoscopic sampling in patients with suspected pneumonia, to determine lung microbial ecosystem dynamics throughout pneumonia therapy. We combine 16S rRNA gene amplicon, metagenomic, and transcriptomic sequencing with bacterial load quantification to reveal clinically-relevant pneumonia progression drivers. Microbiota states are predictive of pneumonia category and exhibit differential stability and pneumonia therapy response. Disruptive forces, like aspiration, associate with cohesive changes in gene expression and microbial community structure. In summary, we show that host and microbiota landscapes change in unison with clinical phenotypes and that microbiota state dynamics reflect pneumonia progression. We suggest that distinct pathways of lung microbial community succession mediate pneumonia progression. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest. Funding Statement This study was funded by the NIH (Resarch program number: 5U19AI135964-02). Author Declarations I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained. Yes The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below: The Institutional Review Board of Northwestern University gave ethical approval for this work (STU00204868). I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals. Yes I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance). Yes I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable. Yes Footnotes ↵7 Lead contact The discussion section has been rewritten to expand on the ecological significance of the findings and clarify some observations. Data Availability All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors.