Assessing analysis methods of brain synchrony in social interaction: Simulation-based comparison

preprint OA: closed Public-Domain
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher
Full text 1,545 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract Inter-brain synchrony is an essential measure for investigating social interactive behaviour via hyperscanning. While functional near-infrared spectroscopy is a unique modality for measuring this index in dynamic, real-world interactions, methods to adequately assess inter-brain relationships have not been firmly established, and the overall picture remains unclear. Consequently, in this article, we first briefly summarize analysis methods for examining social interaction by dividing them into static and dynamic measures. Among these, we focus on measures of synchrony and their assessment in correlating behaviours, conducting a simulation-based comparison and analysis. Specifically, we directly compared static and dynamic variants of wavelet transform coherence (WTC), Pearson’s correlation coefficient (CC), and phase mutual information (pMI) using a real fNIRS dataset. Results showed a significant divergence between WTC and CC, while WTC and pMI exhibited similar patterns as static measures. Overall, WTC was suggested to better identify synchrony due to its non-linear, instantaneous, and robust nature. For the latter part, based on other simulation analyses, we propose a new method using generalized linear model (GLM) regression. Simulations with synthetic fNIRS data supported the effectiveness of our proposed method, which can capture the dynamic relationships between inter-brain synchrony and behaviour, even during free interaction. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-28T02:00:01.590549+00:00
License: Public-Domain