New classification of intrinsic disorder in the Human proteome

preprint OA: closed
📄 Open PDF View at publisher

Abstract

ABSTRACT We propose a new, sequence-only, classification of intrinsically disordered human proteins which is based on two parameters: dr, the percentage of disordered residues, and Ld, the length of the longest disordered segment in the sequence. Depending on dr and Ld, we distinguish five variants: i) ordered proteins (ORDs); ii) not disordered proteins (NDPsj; (iii) proteins with intrinsically disordered regions (PDRs); iv) intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs) and v) proteins with fragmented disorder (FRAGs). PDRs have been considered in the general category of intrinsically disordered proteins for a long time. We show that PDRs are closer to globular, ordered proteins (ORDs and NDPs) than to disordered ones (IDPs), both in amino acid composition and functionally. Moreover, NDPs and PDRs are uniformly spread over several functional protein classes, whereas IDPs are concentrated only on two, namely nucleic acid binding proteins and transcription factors , which are just a subset of the functions that are commonly associated with protein intrinsic disorder. As a conclusion, PDRs and IDPs should be considered, in future classifications, as distinct variants of disordered proteins, with different physical-chemical properties and functional spectra.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-19T01:45:01.086888+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-06-13T06:42:57.164913+00:00