Introduction
Endometriosis (EM) is a chronic gynecological disorder
marked by the presence of endometrial-like tissue outside
the uterus. This condition is associated with a range of
symptoms including pelvic discomfort, dysmenorrhea, and
infertility [1]. Globally, approximately 10% of women of re -
productive age are affected, which translates to an estimated
190 million individuals [2]. The disease significantly impacts
the quality of life and often requires long-term medical man-
agement. The health burden of EM encompasses chronic
pain and substantial lifetime costs, estimated at $27,855
per patient per year. This results in annual healthcare ex -
penses on EM of approximately $22 billion in the United
States and £12.5 billion in the United Kingdom, accounting
for treatment, lost work, and related healthcare costs [3].
Therefore, advancing our understanding and treatment of
EM are paramount priorities for women's health. The etiolo-
gy of EM is complex and encompasses multiple contributing
factors, including retrograde menstruation, immune system
dysfunction, benign metastasis, coelomic metaplasia, hor -
monal imbalances, participation of stem cells, modifications
in epigenetic regulation, and various environmental factors
[4-6]. Furthermore, another study highlighted a strong link
between dietary patterns and the risk of endometrioma de -
velopment, demonstrating that lower calcium intake is sig -
nificantly associated with an increased risk of endometrioma
[7]. Currently, no singular pathophysiological or molecular
framework exists that sufficiently elucidates every instance of
this disorder.
Recent studies have suggested that metabolic alterations
play a role in the pathogenesis of EM. Women with EM have
demonstrated alterations in lipid, glucose, and amino acid
metabolism that may facilitate disease progression by affect-
ing the endocrine environment, altering immune responses,
and promoting lesion growth [8,9]. Extensive research has
consistently demonstrated a strong correlation between the
development and advancement of EM and abnormalities in
lipid metabolism, as evidenced by significant differences in
lipid profiles between women with EM and healthy controls
Objective
Endometriosis (EM) is a chronic gynecological condition of unclear etiology, with evidence suggesting a link between
metabolite levels and EM risk. A two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) approach was used to explore the associ-
ation between 233 metabolites and EM.
Methods
Using publicly available genetic data, we conducted a bidirectional two-sample MR analysis to assess the associations
between metabolites and EM. Sensitivity analyses were performed to test robustness and pleiotropy, with Bonferroni
correction applied for significance.
Results
MR analysis suggested that genetically elevated diacylglycerol levels were significantly associated with increased EM
risk (odds ratio [OR], 1.225; P=1.16×10
-7
), corresponding to a 22.5% increase in risk per standard deviation increase
in genetically predicted diacylglycerol levels, and remained significant after Bonferroni correction. Nominally signifi-
cant associations were observed for several other metabolites; lower ratios of 3-hydroxybutyrate and saturated fatty
acids to total fatty acids and of total cholesterol to total lipids in very low-density lipoproteins were associated with
a higher EM risk (OR, 0.863; P =0.015; OR, 0.865; P=0.030; OR, 0.855; P=1.51×10
-4
). Reverse MR analysis showed that
increased levels of conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) and tyrosine and the CLA to total fatty acid ratio exhibited nominal
associations with EM (OR, 1.026; P=0.043; OR, 1.036; P=3.33×10
-4
; OR, 1.026; P=0.045). No significant heterogeneity or
pleiotropy was observed.
Conclusion
This study provides evidence of an association between specific metabolites, especially diacylglycerol, and EM risk, en-
hancing our understanding of the metabolic profile associated with EM.
Keywords
Endometriosis; Mendelian randomization; Plasma metabolites; Genome-wide association study
www.ogscience.org214
Vol. 69, No. 3, 2026
[8,10-13]. Previous research has shown that individuals with
EM exhibit statistically significant differences in altered amino
acid levels within the tissue (eutopic endometrium), serum,
follicular fluid, urine, and endometrial fluid compared to
healthy controls. These findings are crucial for understanding
various aspects of disease progression. Altered amino acid
levels may elucidate the mechanisms of tissue injury repair
in EM and the heightened energy demands of proliferative
endometrial cells [8]. Glucose metabolism is significantly
affected in patients with EM. Similar to tumor cells, ectopic
endometrial stromal cells exhibit the Warburg effect, which
is characterized by an increase in lactate production and
heightened consumption of glucose [14]. Elevated levels of
aerobic glycolysis and histone lactylation enhance cell pro -
liferation and migration, thereby contributing to the patho -
physiology of EM [9]. Furthermore, studies indicate that
glycolysis and lactate accumulation profoundly influence the
regulation of the immunomicroenvironment, with lactate
acting as a crucial factor that drives M2 macrophage polar -
ization, thereby promoting the invasion of endometriotic
stromal cells both in vitro and in vivo [15]. Thus, there is a
strong correlation between metabolic abnormalities and EM.
A thorough investigation of the roles of relevant metabolites
in EM will enhance our understanding of the underlying
pathophysiological mechanisms of this complex condition
and facilitate the development of novel diagnostic and thera-
peutic strategies.
Traditional observational studies frequently encounter chal-
lenges, such as confounding factors and reverse causation,
which can impede the ability to draw definitive conclusions
regarding causal relationships. Mendelian randomization (MR)
is a robust alternative that employs genetic variants as instru-
mental variables to infer causality. This approach mitigates
the issues of confounding and reverse causation, yielding
more reliable estimates of causal effects. The objective of
this study was to clarify the association between circulating
metabolites and EM using MR analysis. This study used data
from a comprehensive collection of 233 circulating metabo -
lites derived from a genome-wide association study (GWAS)
repository to examine the possible associations between EM
and these metabolites. Furthermore, we sought to detect cir-
culating metabolites that may serve as important biomarkers
for the early detection of EM and contribute to the develop -
ment of effective diagnostic and therapeutic strategies.
Materials and methods
1. Study design
We conducted bidirectional MR analysis to evaluate the po -
tential influence of 233 circulating metabolites on EM risk.
Following the framework established by Bowden et al. [16],
our analysis was based on three key assumptions: first, the
selected genetic instruments (IVs) derived from the datasets
were linked to the exposure variable; second, these IVs were
not associated with any hidden confounders related to ex -
posure; and third, the IVs influenced the outcomes solely via
the exposure factor without any alternative pathways. Our
research involved human subjects and a reanalysis of exist -
ing publicly available data that had already received ethical
approval and participant consent, thereby eliminating the
need for additional ethical reviews or consent procedures.
An overview of the study design and methodological flow is
shown in Fig. 1.
2. Data sources
The circulating plasma metabolite dataset used in this
study was obtained from the GWAS Catalog database (ID:
GCST90301941-GCST90302173). This dataset comprises
233 metabolic traits, including 213 lipid and lipoprotein
parameters or fatty acids, along with 20 non-lipid traits, in -
cluding amino acids, ketone bodies, metabolites related to
glycolysis/gluconeogenesis, fluid balance, and inflammation.
Following variant filtering and quality control, 13,389,637
imputed autosomal single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs)
were included in the meta-analysis involving 136,016 par -
ticipants [17]. EM data were obtained from the R10 release
dataset of the FinnGen Consortium (https://r10.finngen.fi/),
which comprised 16,588 case samples and 111,583 control
samples, all of which were of European ancestry [18].
3. Instrumental variables selection
In accordance with methodologies utilized in prior research,
a diverse array of IVs was systematically selected for each
circulating metabolite and EM condition within the frame -
work of our MR analysis [19-22]. We identified SNPs that
exhibited statistically significant associations with circulating
metabolites, adhering to a genome-wide significance thresh-
old (P <1×10
-5
; r
2
=0.001; genetic distance=10,000 KB). To
ensure sufficient SNP availability for sensitivity assessments,
relaxed selection criteria were applied to circulating metab -
www.ogscience.org 215
Lele Pan, et al. Metabolites&endometriosis MR study
olites. For EM analyses, however, stringent parameters were
adopted ( P<5×10
-8
; r
2
=0.001) with preserved 10,000 KB
genetic distancing. Linkage disequilibrium pattern characteri-
zation le veraged the European reference dataset of the 1,000
Genomes Project using clumping procedures. The variance
explanation capacity of the IVs was determined through R
2
computation coupled with rigorous F-statistic filtering (F>10)
to ensure adequate instrument strength.
4. Statistical analysis
In order to assess the associations between 233 circulating
metabolites and EM, we employed the Mendelian Random -
ization package version 0.4.3 (Stephen Burgess, Cambridge,
UK) to perform various analyses, including inverse-variance
weighted (IVW), MR Egger, weighted median, simple mode,
and weighted mode approaches [16,23-28]. These analytical
methodologies were carefully selected to reduce possible bias
and enhance the reliability of our research outcomes. In the
MR analysis, the IVW method was predominantly employed
because of its capacity to offer a dependable assessment of
the exposure-outcome relationship under the condition that
the IVs exhibited no pleiotropic effects. Cochran’s Q statistics
were used to evaluate heterogeneity among individual SNPs.
When no significant heterogeneity was found (P <0.05), a
fixed-effects model was used; however, when notable het -
erogeneity was present, a random-effects model was used.
To mitigate potential pleiotropic bias, we implemented MR-
Egger regression to evaluate the systematic bias from pleio -
tropic effects through an intercept term analysis. Comple -
mentary sensitivity assessments included the MR-pleiotropy
residual sum and outlier approach to systematically identify
and remove genetic variants that exhibited pleiotropic dis -
tortions that might compromise causal estimates. A leave-
one-out sensitivity analysis was conducted to assess whether
any single SNP introduced bias affecting the overall causal
conclusions. Scatter plots showed that no outliers signifi -
cantly impacted the findings, and funnel plots confirmed the
robustness of the association in the absence of heterogene -
ity. All statistical analyses were performed with a two-sided
significance threshold of 0.05 and were executed using R
software (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna,
Austria). A multiple-testing-adjusted threshold of P<1.07×10
-4
(0.05/466) was established based on the Bonferroni cor -
rection, to identify a statistically significant association [29].
Furthermore, metabolites with P <0.05, which exceeded the
Bonferroni-corrected threshold, were reported as suggestive
No association
Confounder
Instrumental
variables:
SNPs
Exposure Outcome
Reliable association
No independent association
Selection criteria
1. Circulating metabolites: P<1×10
-5
;
EM: P10
1. MR analysis
IVW, weighted median, MR Egger, Simple
mode, and Weighted mode
2. Sensitivity analysis
3. Reverse MR analysis
4. Metabolic pathway analysis
Fig. 1. The study design and workflow of the present MR study. SNPs, single-nucleotide polymorphisms; EM, endometriosis; MR,
Mendelian randomization; IVW, inverse-variance weighted.
www.ogscience.org216
Vol. 69, No. 3, 2026
risk predictors for EM. The combination of these complemen-
tary approaches led to strong and dependable assessments
of the association between circulating metabolites and EM.
Results
Two-sample bidirectional MR analysis was conducted to
investigate the association between circulating metabolites
and EM. The IVW method served as the primary analytical
framework and was supplemented by the MR-Egger regres -
sion, simple mode, weighted mode, and weighted median
approaches.
1. Exploration of the association effect of circulating
metabolites on EM
The results of the MR analysis are summarized in Fig. 2. The
IVW method suggested that genetically predicted higher
levels of diacylglycerol were associated with an increased
risk of EM (odds ratio [OR], 1.225; 95% confidence interva
[CI], 1.136-1.321; P =1.16×10
-7
), corresponding to a 22.5%
increase in risk per standard deviation increase in genetically
predicted diacylglycerol levels, and this association remained
significant after applying a strict Bonferroni correction. Sev -
eral other metabolites showed nominally significant associa -
tions. Genetically predicted lower levels of 3-hydroxybutyrate
(OR, 0.863; 95% CI, 0.767-0.972; P=0.015), a lower ratio of
saturated fatty acids to total fatty acids (OR, 0.865; 95% CI,
0.759-0.986; P=0.030), and a lower ratio of total cholesterol
to total lipids in very small very low-density lipoproteins (VLDL)
(OR, 0.855; 95% CI, 0.789-0.927; P =1.51×10
-4
) were also
associated with a higher EM risk. Furthermore, supplemen -
tary methodologies validated our results and demonstrated
a consistent direction of the effect (Fig. 2). The stability of
the identified association links was confirmed using various
alternative methods and sensitivity analyses, as outlined in
Supplementary Table 1. Visual representations, including
scatter and funnel plots, further confirmed the consistency
and reliability of the findings (Supplementary Fig. 1).
2. Exploration of the association effect of EM on
circulating metabolites
The results of the reverse MR analysis are shown in Fig. 3.
Using the IVW method, we found evidence suggesting that
a genetic predisposition to EM was associated with several
circulating metabolites. Specifically, EM showed nominally
significant associations with higher levels of conjugated lin -
oleic acid (CLA) (OR, 1.026; 95% CI, 1.000-1.053; P=0.043),
ratios of CLA to total fatty acids (OR, 1.026; 95% CI, 1.000-
1.053; P=0.045), and tyrosine levels (OR, 1.036; 95% CI,
Fig. 2. Forest plots of MR estimates of genetic associations between circulating metabolites and EM. nsnp, number of single-nucleotide
polymorphisms; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; MR, Mendelian randomization; VLDL, very low-density lipoproteins.
Exposure Outcome nsnp Method OR (95%CI) P
MR Egger 1.277 (1.101, 1.482) 0.001
Weighted median 1.261 (1.126, 1.413) 5.86E-05
Diacylglycerol levels Endometriosis 68 Inverse variance weighted 1.225 (1.136, 1.321) 1.16E-07
Simple mode 1.292 (1.064, 1.569) 0.011
Weighted mode 1.277 (1.120, 1.457) 5.14E-04
MR Egger 0.880 (0.686, 1.127) 0.318
Weighted median 0.887 (0.748, 1.052) 0.169
3-hydroxybutyrate levels Endometriosis 44 Inverse variance weighted 0.863 (0.767, 0.972) 0.015
Simple mode 0.920 (0.674, 1.256) 0.605
Weighted mode 0.913 (0.728, 1.146) 0.440
MR Egger 0.904 (0.692, 1.182) 0.465
Weighted median 0.878 (0.722, 1.069) 0.196
Ratio of saturated fatty acids to total fatty acids Endometriosis 53 Inverse variance weighted 0.865 (0.759, 0.986) 0.030
Simple mode 0.849 (0.586, 1.230) 0.392
Weighted mode 0.917 (0.719, 1.169) 0.489
MR Egger 0.858 (0.746, 0.988) 0.036
Weighted median 0.823 (0.729, 0.929) 0.001
Total cholesterol to total lipids ratio in very small VLDL Endometriosis 92 Inverse variance weighted 0.855 (0.789, 0.927) 1.15E-04
Simple mode 0.864 (0.660, 1.131) 0.291
Weighted mode 0.835 (0.732, 0.952) 0.008
0.6 0.8 1 1.2
Lower risk Higher risk
www.ogscience.org 217
Lele Pan, et al. Metabolites&endometriosis MR study
1.016-1.057; P=3.33×10
-4
). To strengthen the associations
identified in our study, we used multiple supplementary
analytical approaches, along with sensitivity analyses (Sup -
plementary Table 2). We also generated scatter and funnel
plots to illustrate the robustness and validity of the results
(Supplementary Fig. 2), further enhancing the credibility of
the conclusions.
Discussion
In this study, we elucidated the association between 233 ge-
netically predicted serum metabolites and EM using genetic
variation as an instrumental variable within a two-sample
MR framework. Our findings indicate associations between
two metabolites (diacylglycerol and 3-hydroxybutyrate) and
two metabolite ratios (the ratio of saturated fatty acids to
total fatty acids and the total cholesterol to total lipid ratio
in very small VLDL) in EM, while also demonstrating that EM
influences two metabolites (CLA and tyrosine) and one me -
tabolite ratio (the ratio of CLA to total fatty acids). Notably,
one of these associations was statistically significant after
correcting for multiple tests, suggesting a strong relationship.
In this exploratory study, we found that multiple metabolites
were associated with EM. This study contributes to the un -
derstanding of the metabolic factors involved in the patho -
genesis of EM and provides a foundation for future studies
and potential therapeutic targets.
Alterations in lipid metabolism have been associated with
the onset and progression of EM, and previous studies have
confirmed the dysregulation of various lipids, including
phosphatidylcholines, sphingomyelins, phosphatidyletha -
nolamines, and triglycerides [13,30,31]. Diacylglycerol is a
significant lipid molecule involved in various cellular signaling
pathways, including those regulating inflammation and cell
proliferation [32]. Research has demonstrated significant dif-
ferences between the endometriotic and endometrial tissues
in these patients [33]. However, few studies have examined
the relationship between diacylglycerol and EM. The findings
of this study demonstrated a significant correlation between
higher concentrations of diacylglycerol and elevated suscep -
tibility to EM onset. These findings are consistent with those
of previous studies. This study also found that decreased
ratios of saturated to total fatty acids and total cholesterol
to total lipids in very small VLDL were associated with an
increased risk of EM. Therefore, our findings indicate a close
relationship between lipid metabolism and EM, although fur-
ther investigation of the underlying mechanisms is warrant -
ed.
3-hydroxybutyrate is one of the primary ketone bodies pro-
duced during fatty acid metabolism and serves not only as an
intermediate metabolite but also as an important regulatory
Fig. 3. Forest plots of MR estimates of genetic associations between EM and circulating metabolites. nsnp, number of single-nucleotide
polymorphisms; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; MR, Mendelian randomization; CLA, conjugated linoleic acid; EM, endometriosis.
Exposure Outcome nsnp Method OR (95%CI) P
MR Egger 1.076 (1.000, 1.158) 0.060
Weighted median 1.048 (1.008, 1.089) 0.016
Endometriosis Conjugated linoleic acid 26 Inverse variance weighted 1.026 (1.000, 1.053) 0.043
Simple mode 1.068 (0.987, 1.155) 0.113
Weighted mode 1.066 (0.992, 1.146) 0.093
MR Egger 1.073 (0.997, 1.155) 0.069
Weighted median 1.034 (0.995, 1.074) 0.085
Endometriosis Ratio of CLA to total fatty acids 26 Inverse variance weighted 1.026 (1.000, 1.053) 0.045
Simple mode 1.044 (0.961, 1.135) 0.313
Weighted mode 1.045 (0.959, 1.138) 0.317
MR Egger 1.021 (0.963, 1.081) 0.487
Weighted median 1.036 (1.011, 1.062) 0.004
Endometriosis Tyrosine levels 26 Inverse variance weighted 1.036 (1.016, 1.057) 3.33E-04
Simple mode 1.038 (0.998, 1.079) 0.069
Weighted mode 1.034 (1.001, 1.067) 0.051
0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4
Lower risk Higher risk
www.ogscience.org218
Vol. 69, No. 3, 2026
molecule. Research indicates that 3-hydroxybutyrate plays
significant biological roles in the regulation of energy me -
tabolism, as well as in antioxidant and anti-inflammatory re -
sponses [34]. Furthermore, 3-hydroxybutyrate can influence
cellular survival and function by modulating intracellular sig -
naling pathways and metabolic processes [34,35]. However,
studies on the association between 3-hydroxybutyrate and
EM are limited. Angioni et al. [36] analyzed 22 serum sam -
ples from patients with symptomatic EM and 10 from those
without EM using gas chromatography-mass spectrometer
and revealed a significant increase in 3-hydroxybutyric acid
levels among the patients with EM. In our MR analysis, a
nominally significant association was observed between low-
er genetically predicted levels of 3-hydroxybutyrate and an
increased risk of EM. This exploratory finding suggests that
altered 3-hydroxybutyrate metabolism may be involved in
the pathogenesis of EM but requires verification in larger and
more comprehensive studies. Our findings offer new insights
into and perspectives on this issue.
Previous studies have demonstrated that individuals diag -
nosed with EM display statistically significant alterations in
amino acid levels across various biological matrices, including
the eutopic endometrium, serum, follicular fluid, urine, and
endometrial fluid, compared to healthy controls [8]. However,
the conclusions drawn from these studies are inconsistent. A
study conducted by Pocate-Cheriet et al. [37] indicated that
the concentrations of amino acids such as tyrosine are lower
in women with deep-infiltrating EM than in control partici -
pants. In contrast, Li et al. [38] reported that the metabolom-
ic profile of the eutopic endometrium in patients with EM is
marked by a significant increase in L-tyrosine concentration.
Our exploratory reverse MR analysis suggested that a genetic
predisposition to EM was associated with higher circulating
tyrosine levels. This finding is consistent with the observation
by Li et al. [38] of increased L-tyrosine levels in the eutopic
endometrium of patients with EM. Although this inverse
association does not imply causality, it may reflect metabolic
alterations secondary to the disease state or related patho -
physiology. Thus, tyrosine metabolism could be an area of
interest in EM, and its role warrants further investigation to
determine whether it represents a compensatory mechanism,
biomarker of disease activity, or contributor to progression.
CLA is a polyunsaturated fatty acid that previous studies
have identified as playing significant roles in various biolog -
ical processes. CLA possesses anti-inflammatory, antitumor,
and immunomodulatory activities [39]. Furthermore, research
indicates that CLA exerts its anticancer effects through
mechanisms such as regulation of cell signaling pathways,
inhibition of tumor cell proliferation, and induction of apop -
tosis [40]. Research on the relationship between CLA and EM
is limited. Our reverse MR analysis generated a novel hypoth-
esis by revealing a nominally significant association between
a genetic predisposition to EM and elevated levels of CLA (and
its ratio to total fatty acids). Given the established roles of lo-
cal inflammation and immune dysregulation in EM [5,6], one
speculative interpretation is that the body may upregulate
CLA as a counter-regulatory response to the inflammatory
milieu of EM. Alternatively, this association may highlight a
dysregulated metabolic pathway in patients with EM. These
findings suggest that CLA is a candidate molecule whose re-
lationship with EM warrants further investigation to clarify its
specific biological role.
This study had some limitations that warrant further in -
vestigation. First, a significant limitation of this study was its
reliance on publicly available genetic datasets, which may
pose constraints regarding the cohort scale, demographic
representation, and spectrum of genetic variations associated
with circulating metabolites and EM. Second, our study was
subject to limitations inherent to metabolomic GWAS data.
Metabolite measurements are platform-specific and may af -
fect the coverage and comparability of certain metabolites.
Additionally, potential heterogeneity in sample collection,
processing, and quantification across original studies could
influence the precision of our genetic instrument variables
and the generalizability of the findings. Third, the metabolite
data predominantly originated from European populations,
and all EM-related data were derived from individuals of Eu -
ropean ancestry. Differences in genetic determinants across
ethnic groups (e.g., allele frequencies of genes involved in
metabolic pathways), dietary habits, gut microbiome compo-
sition, and environmental exposures could contribute to vari-
ations in metabolite profiles, thus limiting the generalizability
of our findings to different ethnic groups. Future studies
incorporating large-scale metabolomic data and EM GWAS
from diverse populations are crucial for validating and refin -
ing these findings. Fourth, although the study encompassed
a relatively broad spectrum of metabolites, the functions and
mechanisms of certain metabolites in relation to the disease
remain inadequately understood, which limits the interpreta-
tion of our results from this MR analysis. Consequently, fur -
www.ogscience.org 219
Lele Pan, et al. Metabolites&endometriosis MR study
ther validation is necessary by repeating the study in different
groups and performing functional investigations to reinforce
our findings and clarify the underlying mechanisms.
In summary, this study employed bidirectional two-sam -
ple MR to generate hypotheses regarding the association
between circulating metabolites and EM. While one associ -
ation survived strict Bonferroni correction and prioritized a
metabolic pathway for future mechanistic investigations, all
findings, including those that are suggestive, must be con -
sidered hypothesis-generating. They collectively proposed
novel metabolic risk factors for EM that require substantial
functional validation and replication in larger independent
cohorts before clinical translation can be considered. Finally,
this study provides a foundation for future research exploring
the underlying biology and potential therapeutic targets of
EM.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing financial interests or pro -
fessional affiliations that could constitute a conflict of inter -
est regarding the content of this work.
Ethical approval
Given that the GWAS data are publicly available, ethical ap -
proval was not deemed necessary.
Patient consent
The study utilized public GWAS data from FinnGen (Release
10; https://r10.finngen.fi/) and the GWAS Catalog. Ethical
approval and informed consent were obtained for all origi -
nal studies. Consequently, no additional ethical approval or
informed consent was required for this analysis, as the data
were fully anonymized.
Funding information
This work was supported by Guangdong Basic and Applied
Basic Research Foundation (Grant Nos. 2022A1515011880,
2023A1515011688), and the President Foundation of Zhu -
jiang Hospital, Southern Medical University (Grant No. yzjj
2022ms18) to Ying Ma. This work was also supported by the
Clinical Study on the Treatment of Dysmenorrhea with Fire
Dragon Cupping Combined with Feng's Endometriosis For -
mula (Grant No. 202300067) to Xiaohui Huang.
Acknowledgments
Supplementary Table 1 and 2 information is available on the
link. https://doi.org/10.5468/ogs.25180.
References
1. Lee HJ, Yoon SH, Lee JH, Chung YJ, Park SY, Kim SW, et
al. Clinical evaluation and management of endometrio -
sis: 2024 guideline for Korean patients from the Korean
Society of Endometriosis. Obstet Gynecol Sci 2025;68:
43-58.
2. Samare-Najaf M, Razavinasab SA, Samareh A, Jamali N.
Omics-based novel strategies in the diagnosis of endo -
metriosis. Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci 2024;61:205-25.
3. Horne AW, Missmer SA. Pathophysiology, diagnosis, and
management of endometriosis. BMJ 2022;379:e070750.
4. Lamceva J, Uljanovs R, Strumfa I. The main theories on
the pathogenesis of endometriosis. Int J Mol Sci 2023;
24:4254.
5. Wang Y, Nicholes K, Shih IM. The origin and pathogene-
sis of endometriosis. Annu Rev Pathol 2020;15:71-95.
6. Symons LK, Miller JE, Kay VR, Marks RM, Liblik K, Koti
M, et al. The immunopathophysiology of endometriosis.
Trends Mol Med 2018;24:748-62.
7. Lee HJ, Noh HK, Kim SC, Joo JK, Suh DS, Kim KH. Di -
etary pattern and risk of endometrioma in Korean wom-
en: a case-control study. Obstet Gynecol Sci 2021;64:99-
106.
8. Ortiz CN, Torres-Reverón A, Appleyard CB. Metabolo -
mics in endometriosis: challenges and perspectives for
future studies. Reprod Fertil 2021;2:R35-50.
9. Wen X, Zhang J, Xu Z, Li M, Dong X, Du Y, et al. Highly
expressed lncRNA H19 in endometriosis promotes aer -
obic glycolysis and histone lactylation. Reproduction
2024;168:e240018.
www.ogscience.org220
Vol. 69, No. 3, 2026
10. Li J, Gao Y, Guan L, Zhang H, Sun J, Gong X, et al. Dis -
covery of phosphatidic acid, phosphatidylcholine, and
phosphatidylserine as biomarkers for early diagnosis of
endometriosis. Front Physiol 2018;9:14.
11. Mu F, Rich-Edwards J, Rimm EB, Spiegelman D, Forman
JP , Missmer SA. Association between endometriosis and
hypercholesterolemia or hypertension. Hypertension
2017;70:59-65.
12. Brinca AT, Peiró AM, Evangelio PM, Eleno I, Oliani AH,
Silva V, et al. Follicular fluid and blood monitorization of
infertility biomarkers in women with endometriosis. Int J
Mol Sci 2024;25:7177.
13. Dutta M, Anitha M, Smith PB, Chiaro CR, Maan M,
Chaudhury K, et al. Metabolomics reveals altered lipid
meta bolism in a mouse model of endometriosis. J Pro -
teome Res 2016;15:2626-33.
14. Young VJ, Brown JK, Maybin J, Saunders PT, Duncan
WC, Horne AW. Transforming growth factor- β induced
Warburg-like metabolic reprogramming may underpin
the development of peritoneal endometriosis. J Clin En -
docrinol Metab 2014;99:3450-9.
15. Gou Y, Wang H, Wang T, Wang H, Wang B, Jiao N, et al.
Ectopic endometriotic stromal cells-derived lactate in -
duces M2 macrophage polarization via Mettl3/Trib1/ERK/
STAT3 signalling pathway in endometriosis. Immunology
2023;168:389-402.
16. Bowden J, Davey Smith G, Burgess S. Mendelian ran -
domization with invalid instruments: effect estimation
and bias detection through Egger regression. Int J Epide-
miol 2015;44:512-25.
17. Karjalainen MK, Karthikeyan S, Oliver-Williams C, Sliz E,
Allara E, Fung WT, et al. Genome-wide characterization
of circulating metabolic biomarkers. Nature 2024;628:
130-8.
18. Kurki MI, Karjalainen J, Palta P , Sipilä TP , Kristiansson K,
Donner KM, et al. FinnGen provides genetic insights from
a well-phenotyped isolated population. Nature 2023;
613:508-18.
19. Auton A, Brooks LD, Durbin RM, Garrison EP , Kang HM,
Korbel JO, et al. A global reference for human genetic
variation. Nature 2015;526:68-74.
20. Zhong MM, Xie JH, Feng Y, Zhang SH, Xia JN, Tan L, et
al. Causal effects of the gut microbiome on COVID-19
susceptibility and severity: a two-sample Mendelian ran -
domization study. Front Immunol 2023;14:1173974.
21. Wu Y, Zheng Z, Visscher PM, Yang J. Quantifying the
mapping precision of genome-wide association studies
using whole-genome sequencing data. Genome Biol
2017;18:86.
22. Yengo L, Sidorenko J, Kemper KE, Zheng Z, Wood AR,
Weedon MN, et al. Meta-analysis of genome-wide
association studies for height and body mass index in
~700000 individuals of European ancestry. Hum Mol
Genet 2018;27:3641-9.
23. Bowden J, Davey Smith G, Haycock PC, Burgess S.
Consistent estimation in mendelian randomization with
some invalid instruments using a weighted median esti -
mator. Genet Epidemiol 2016;40:304-14.
24. Burgess S, Thompson SG. Interpreting findings from
Mendelian randomization using the MR-Egger method.
Eur J Epidemiol 2017;32:377-89.
25. Slob EAW, Burgess S. A comparison of robust Mendelian
ran domization methods using summary data. Genet Ep -
idemiol 2020;44:313-29.
26. Verbanck M, Chen CY, Neale B, Do R. Detection of
wide spread horizontal pleiotropy in causal relationships
inferred from Mendelian randomization between com -
plex traits and diseases. Nat Genet 2018;50:693-8.
27. Hartwig FP , Davey Smith G, Bowden J. Robust inference
in summary data Mendelian randomization via the zero
modal pleiotropy assumption. Int J Epidemiol 2017;46:
1985-98.
28. Hemani G, Zheng J, Elsworth B, Wade KH, Haberland V,
Baird D, et al. The MR-base platform supports systematic
causal inference across the human phenome. Elife 2018;
7:e34408.
29. Curtin F, Schulz P . Multiple correlations and Bonferroni's
correction. Biol Psychiatry 1998;44:775-7.
30. Peinado FM, Olivas-Martínez A, Iribarne-Durán LM,
Ubiña A, León J, Vela-Soria F, et al. Cell cycle, apoptosis,
cell differentiation, and lipid metabolism gene expression
in endometriotic tissue and exposure to parabens and
benzophenones. Sci Total Environ 2023;879:163014.
31. Lu J, Ling X, Liu L, Jiang A, Ren C, Lu C, et al. Emerging
hallmarks of endometriosis metabolism: a promising tar-
get for the treatment of endometriosis. Biochim Biophys
Acta Mol Cell Res 2023;1870:119381.
32. Cooke M, Kazanietz MG. Overarching roles of diacyl -
glycerol signaling in cancer development and antitumor
immunity. Sci Signal 2022;15:eabo0264.
www.ogscience.org 221
Lele Pan, et al. Metabolites&endometriosis MR study
33. Adamyan LV, Starodubtseva N, Borisova A, Stepanian
AA, Chagovets V, Salimova D, et al. Direct mass spec -
trometry differentiation of ectopic and eutopic endome-
trium in patients with endometriosis. J Minim Invasive
Gynecol 2018;25:426-33.
34. Mierziak J, Burgberger M, Wojtasik W. 3-hydroxybutyr -
ate as a metabolite and a signal molecule regulating pro-
cesses of living organisms. Biomolecules 2021;11:402.
35. Newman JC, Verdin E. β-hydroxybutyrate: a signaling
metabolite. Annu Rev Nutr 2017;37:51-76.
36. Angioni S, Congiu F, Vitale SG, D'Alterio MN, Noto A,
Monni G, et al. Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry
(GC-MS) metabolites analysis in endometriosis patients:
a prospective observational translational study. J Clin
Med 2023;12:922.
37. Pocate-Cheriet K, Santulli P , Kateb F, Bourdon M,
Maignien C, Batteux F, et al. The follicular fluid metabo -
lome differs according to the endometriosis phenotype.
Reprod Biomed Online 2020;41:1023-37.
38. Li J, Guan L, Zhang H, Gao Y, Sun J, Gong X, et al. En -
dometrium metabolomic profiling reveals potential bio -
markers for diagnosis of endometriosis at minimal-mild
stages. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 2018;16:42.
39. Viladomiu M, Hontecillas R, Bassaganya-Riera J. Modula-
tion of inflammation and immunity by dietary conjugat -
ed linoleic acid. Eur J Pharmacol 2016;785:87-95.
40. Rakib MA, Lee WS, Kim GS, Han JH, Kim JO, Ha YL.
Anti proliferative action of conjugated linoleic acid on
human MCF-7 breast cancer cells mediated by enhance-
ment of gap junctional intercellular communication
through inactivation of NF- κ B. Evid Based Complement
Alternat Med 2013;2013:429393.
www.ogscience.org 1
Lele Pan, et al. Metabolites&endometriosis MR study
Supplementary Table 1. Summary of Mendelian randomization analysis results and metabolite information for the association of
circulating metabolites with endometriosis
www.ogscience.org2
Vol. 69, No. 3, 2026
Supplementary Fig. 1. (A) Scatter plots of the associations between circulating metabolites and endometriosis using the Approach-1
MR study. The two-sample MR analyses were conducted using the MR-Egger, inverse-variance weighted, weighted median, simple mode,
and weighted mode analyses. The estimated MR effect per method is depicted by the slope of each line. (B) Funnel plots of the asso cia-
tions between circulating metabolites and endometriosis using the Approach-1 MR study. (C) The leave‐one‐out analysis of the effect of
asso ciations between circulating metabolites and endometriosis. SNP , single-nucleotide polymorphism; MR, Mendelian randomization.
MR test
Inverse variance weighted Weighted median
MR Egger Weighted made
Simple mode
0.2
0.1
0.0
-0.1
-0.2
0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20
SNP effect on exposure
SNP effect on outcome
MR test
Inverse variance weighted Weighted median
MR Egger Weighted made
Simple mode
0.1
0.0
-0.1
-0.2
0.05 0.10 0.15
SNP effect on exposure
SNP effect on outcome
MR test
Inverse variance weighted Weighted median
MR Egger Weighted made
Simple mode
0.2
0.1
0.0
-0.1
-0.2
0.05 0.10
SNP effect on exposure
SNP effect on outcome
MR test
Inverse variance weighted Weighted median
MR Egger Weighted made
Simple mode
0.2
0.1
0.0
-0.1
-0.2
0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20
SNP effect on exposure
SNP effect on outcome
A
www.ogscience.org 3
Lele Pan, et al. Metabolites&endometriosis MR study
Supplementary Fig. 1. (Continued)
MR method
Inverse variance weighted
MR Egger
7.5
5.0
2.5
-1.0 -0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0
βIV
1/SEIV
MR method
Inverse variance weighted
MR Egger
6
5
4
3
2
-1 0 1
βIV
1/SEIV
MR method
Inverse variance weighted
MR Egger
5
4
3
2
1
-1 0 1
βIV
1/SEIV
MR method
Inverse variance weighted
MR Egger
7.5
5.0
2.5
-2 -1 0 1
βIV
1/SEIV
B
www.ogscience.org4
Vol. 69, No. 3, 2026
Supplementary Fig. 1. (Continued)
C
rs2645429
rs28809016
rs35726795
rs1961456
rs2575876
rs9271770
rs4930724
rs72836561
rs800544
rs76744666
rs12212146
rs34168560
rs17676564
rs114820087
rs10455872
rs6494437
rs42125
rs12705610
rs781098
rs2414577
rs1800588
rs12972842
rs3734674
rs62001733
rs10147786
rs1168085
rs2207132
rs117300555
rs139915535
rs1398636
rs1154130
rs187429064
rs144018203
rs2419921
rs72690714
rs3201892
rs9471629
rs10203950
rs5765090
rs584007
rs143343360
rs79468765
rs12359135
rs3780546
rs58489806
rs1092834
rs998584
rs4130929
rs207078
rs117733303
rs139974673
rs56022644
rs4704834
rs2927323
rs1042034
rs13702
rs1203110
rs10098077
rs17145750
rs57209787
rs1260326
rs10410805
rs964184
rs9686661
rs247616
rs78058190
rs10195252
rs116843064
All
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3
MR leave‐one‐out sensitivity analysis for 'exposure' on 'outcome'
rs2954021
rs150072275
rs62111729
rs36039532
rs2156552
rs1009062
rs61824906
rs117643180
rs114165349
rs516979
rs429358
rs277407
rs76484733
rs1215112
rs117341151
rs1698148
rs28442086
rs147507218
rs249698
rs7424006
rs189288878
rs13284054
rs2760105
rs77807654
rs4762701
rs261342
rs115985916
rs11581618
rs45611540
rs148921528
rs9302635
rs111962457
rs2792759
rs143099396
rs12653566
rs627108
rs12867528
rs1859913.
rs1982099
rs11046944
rs6562430
rs7024300
rs4841132
rs28929474
All
-0.3 -0.2 -0.1 0.0
MR leave‐one‐out sensitivity analysis for 'exposure' on 'outcome'
rs964184
rs67981690
rs4645936
rs149553138
rs2025106
rs191347211
rs12046045
rs9303025
rs6539531
rs188247550
rs72753977
rs 192687038
rs183064231
rs148532534
rs137932018
rs6460047
rs1229984
rs151264254
rs35318168
rs7554117
rs58542926
rs603424
rs35194512
rs7704772
rs952275
rs62039480
rs2294915
rs117525819
rs9266504
rs138050176
rs7528419
rs3750720
rs11580878
rs2329656
rs117965774
rs4970737
rs4976941
rs12639940
rs11920975
rs79236197
rs112505274
rs116479611
rs41278166
rs6467314
rs315432
rs4753170
rs916217
rs4986970
rs2737252
rs11571787
rs1061808
rs429358
rs174574
All
-0.3 -0.2 -0.1 0.0
MR leave‐one‐out sensitivity analysis for 'exposure' on 'outcome'
rs4149056rs964184rs116843064rs295402rs1260326rs84473rs1265103rs78085190rs112333700rs600626rs1042034rs9687846rs6680258rs113879698rs78867939rs35739466rs139974673rs3767306rs6792725rs7787268rs141501282rs236987rs57457691rs12208947rs7994900rs2161456rs71581921rs588136rs10935980rs17054273rs11207970rs17145739rs12443775rs6905288rs113607731rs58542926rs1229984rs141469619rs9384970rs2642442rs2715634rs34088055rs6445881rs261337rs11587071rs73045691rs7632367rs7830528rs2294915rs12928099rs2460760rs10796449rs890928rs139915535rs17347255rs3011802r6029126rs12022365rs12655753rs11563512rs2169387rs55789316rs140394rs4845597rs78778914rs74741542rs406315rs2737248rs3827743rs8169rs72836561rs62229368rs1051052rs675849rs1801390rs1532085rs794268rs2251319rs75679663rs77303550rs11731799rs75460349rs2620798rs1313996rs11639845rs4846913rs11170413rs6073958rs7412rs183130rs61983884rs174574
All
-0.2 -0.1 0.0
MR leave‐one‐out sensitivity analysis for 'exposure' on 'outcome'
www.ogscience.org 5
Lele Pan, et al. Metabolites&endometriosis MR study
Supplementary Table 2. Summary of Mendelian randomization analysis results and metabolite information for the association of
endometriosis with circulating metabolites
www.ogscience.org6
Vol. 69, No. 3, 2026
Supplementary Fig. 2. (A) Scatter plots of the associations between endometriosis and circulating metabolites using the Approach-1
MR study. The two-sample MR analyses were conducted using the MR-Egger, inverse-variance weighted, weighted median, simple mode,
and weighted mode analyses. The estimated MR effect per method is depicted by the slope of each line. (B) Funnel plots of the asso cia-
tions between endometriosis and circulating metabolites using the Approach-1 MR study. (C) The leave‐one‐out analysis of the asso cia-
tions between endometriosis and circulating metabolites. SNP , single-nucleotide polymorphism; MR, Mendelian randomization.
MR test
Inverse variance weighted Weighted median
MR Egger Weighted made
Simple mode
0.04
0.02
0.00
-0.02
0.1 0.2 0.3
SNP effect on exposure
SNP effect on outcome
MR test
Inverse variance weighted Weighted median
MR Egger Weighted made
Simple mode
0.04
0.02
0.00
0.1 0.2 0.3
SNP effect on exposure
SNP effect on outcome
MR test
Inverse variance weighted Weighted median
MR Egger Weighted made
Simple mode
0.02
0.01
0.00
-0.01
0.1 0.2 0.3
SNP effect on exposure
SNP effect on outcome
MR test
Inverse variance weighted
MR Egger
25
20
15
10
-0.10 -0.05 0.00 0.05 0.10
βIV
1/SEIV
MR test
Inverse variance weighted
MR Egger
25
20
15
10
-0.10 -0.05 0.00 0.05 0.10
βIV
1/SEIV
MR test
Inverse variance weighted
MR Egger
35
30
25
20
15
0.0 0.1 0.2
βIV
1/SEIV
A
B
C
rs4516787
rs4762308
rs34068702
rs13264285
rs11940163
rs10778172
rs66741626
rs9368804
rs727412
rs1209731
rs851984
rs12317475
rs12535837
rs940061
rs34803821
rs2473321
rs635634
rs3803361
rs2779747
rs2800709
rs61778046
rs11776952
rs11031005
rs6546324
rs75969278
rs58415480
All
0.00 0.02 0.04 0.06
MR leave‐one‐out sensitivity analysis for 'exposure' on 'outcome'
rs4516787
rs4762308
rs13264285
rs34068702
rs851984
rs9368804
rs11940163
rs727412
rs10778172
rs66741626
rs2800709
rs1209731
rs12317475
rs635634
rs3803361
rs34803821
rs12535837
rs2473321
rs11031005
rs940061
rs11776952
rs61778046
rs2779747
rs6546324
rs75969278
rs58415480
All
0.00 0.02 0.04 0.06
MR leave‐one‐out sensitivity analysis for 'exposure' on 'outcome'
rs12317475
rs75969278
rs4762308
rs9368804
rs4516787
rs12535837
rs66741626
rs34068702
rs2779747
rs11940163
rs1209731
rs11776952
rs34803821
rs61778046
rs727412
rs940061
rs10778172
rs11031005
rs2473321
rs58415480
rs3803361
rs6546324
rs2800709
rs13264285
rs851984
rs635634
All
0.00 0.02 0.04 0.06
MR leave‐one‐out sensitivity analysis for 'exposure' on 'outcome'
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
(via DOI)
is the canonical version.