Results
Human Genetics
The genomic mechanism for relationship of MTSS1 to cardiac phenotypes is hypothesized to be
a disruption of a cardiac enhancer by a common genetic variant, confirmed by expressed
quantitative trait (eQTL) analyses of multiple datasets where the rs35006907-C allele was
associated with higher risk of DCM and increased MTSS1 expression in European and Han
Chinese populations4,12. Data from the Genotype Tissue Expression Consortium confirms this
finding where the T allele of rs12541595 is strongly associated with lower left ventricular
expression of MTSS1 [Fig.1A] and is in strong linkage with rs35006907 (R2 0.9799). Within the
UK Biobank, a large prospective cohort of participants enrolled at age 40 or later, 99 individuals
carrying a pathogenic or likely pathogenic (P/LP) mutation in TTN developed a diagnosis of
DCM13. Individuals carrying both TTN P/LP variants and the MTSS1 expression-lowering T
allele of rs12541595, showed significantly improved event-free survival from cardiovascular
death or heart transplant (HR 0.29, p=0.0016) relative to individuals homozygous for the G
allele [Fig.1B] suggesting that lower levels of MTSS1 may also be specifically protective from
the contractile dysfunction which underlies TTN DCM.
iPSC Models of DCM
To explore the impact of MTSS1 knockdown on cardiomyocyte biology we performed high-
throughput high-content confocal microscopy to quantify aspects of cardiomyocyte and
sarcomere biology (number of sarcomeres, sarcomere length, sarcomere angle, and sarcomere
score/quality) based on previously described modifications of deep learning approach14–16.
Using the imaging derived parameters, we developed a set of classification algorithms to
incorporate the entirety of the sarcomere imaging data to distinguish untreated WT iPSC-CMs
from DCM models of disease induced by siRNA knockdown. For each DCM model, a random
forest classifier was constructed which incorporated and weighted the sarcomere biology data to
output the probability that an image was derived from WT cells (treated with a scrambled
siRNA) or a DCM disease gene [Fig 2A]. The prediction models displayed good or excellent
discriminatory performance when evaluated on a held-out test dataset separate from the
training data [Fig S1]. We observed that siRNA knockdown of MTSS1 shifted the classification
of cells treated with siRNA-TTN (p=2.9e-06) and in a dose dependent effect for siRNA-CSRP3
(pLM_dose=1.34e-14) along with a dose dependent effect for RBM20 (p=5.7e-04) [Fig.2B,C,E]. By
contrast, treatment with siRNA-MTSS1 only modestly shifted the model classifications of the WT
All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted August 20, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.08.14.24311020doi: medRxiv preprint
iPSCs treated with siRNA for TPM1 with a much smaller dose-dependent effect (p=0.07) [Fig
2D]. Importantly, we observed that the siRNA models of DCM mildly impact iPSC-CM survival
[Fig S2], therefore to ensure that the shift in classification was not solely attributable to an
impact on cellular survival, siRNA MTSS1 was applied to an iPSC-CM line carrying a
pathogenic DCM truncating mutation in TTN P22353X17 which also showed a moderate
beneficial shift in classification when the siTTN-model was applied to the dataset (p=0.029)
[Fig.S3].
The primary clinical deficit in DCM is decreased cardiac contractility. In order to further explore
the in silico observations and hypotheses generated from high throughput imaging we examined
the effect of MTSS1 knockdown in a variety of iPSC-CM models of DCM using a commercially
available engineered heart tissue (EHT) system. EHTs seeded with cells carrying a known
pathogenic mutation in TTN P22353X display impaired contractility relative to isogenic controls
[Fig.S4] and when TTN P22353X EHTs were treated with siRNA for MTSS1 (siMTSS1) we
observed an improvement of 129% in twitch force (p=1.9e-04) [Fig.3A] and additional
experiments confirmed improvements in twitch force were correlated with the degree of siRNA
mediated reduction in MTSS1 levels [Fig.S5]. Next, we surveyed the impact of siRNA-MTSS1 in
other forms of genetic DCM. Improved contractility was observed in iPSC-CMs with siRNA
knockdown of CSRP3/MLP treated with siMTSS1 [Fig.3B] as well as with an isogenic line of
RBM20 carrying a known pathogenic mutation S635FS18 where we observed a 284%
improvement in twitch force (p<2e-16). Notably there was no improvement in sarcomere
appearance in quantitative microscopy and no corresponding improvement in contractility in
BAG3 iPSC-CM models of DCM treated with siRNA MTSS1 [Fig.S6]. The observation of
improved twitch force confirmed the possibility that MTSS1 knockdown may have a beneficial
effect upon cardiac contractility in DCM related to pathogenic mutations in TTN, CSRP3, and
RBM20.
Quantitative Microscopy and Mechanistic Investigations
To gain a better understanding of the role of MTSS1 within the cardiomyocytes and sarcomere
biology, we examined the quantitative microscopy data for all siRNA and genetic iPSC-CM
backgrounds tested. Notably with siRNA knockdown of MTSS1 we observed a reproducible
increase in the total number of sarcomeres and the number of sarcomeres per cardiomyocyte
across different genetic backgrounds [Fig.4A-C, Fig.S7]. Given the observation that siRNA
knockdown of MTSS1 appeared to increase the number of sarcomeres within an iPSC-CM and
improved measures of contractility in select iPSC-CM models of DCM, we sought to further
All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted August 20, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.08.14.24311020doi: medRxiv preprint
investigate the molecular mechanism within cardiomyocytes by which MTSS1 exerts effects on
sarcomeres and contractility. Confocal imaging of GFP labelled MTSS1 in iPSC-CMs suggested
a peri-nuclear cytoplasmic localization of MTSS1 away from the periphery of the cell without
significant co-localization to the sarcomere [Fig.5A].
Formation of new sarcomeres in mature cardiomyocytes appears to arise from actin stress
fibers within the periphery of cardiomyocytes19. Existing single cell data suggests that as a
cytoskeletal-related actin binding protein MTSS1 is known to have relatively ubiquitous
expression including cardiomyocytes [Fig.S9A] and other than actin is not previously known to
have binding partners which modulate contractility or sarcomere function in cardiomyocytes
[Fig.S9B]. To interrogate the protein binding partners of MTSS1 specific to cardiomyocytes, we
performed AAV infection of a wild-type iPSC-CM cell line with a FLAG-tagged MTSS1 construct
followed by a pull-down and mass spectrometry [Fig.5B]. Relative to an AAV transfection of
FLAG-tagged GFP control, the MTSS1 construct appeared to interact with high-affinity to
previously known binding partners20,21 [Table S1], multiple members of the protein phosphatase
2A complex, and notably the non-motor myosin MYO18A, a protein known to potentiate the
formation of actin-stress fibers22,23 [Fig.5C]. To assess these findings, individual co-
immunoprecipitation assays confirmed a protein-protein interaction in iPSC-CMs between
MTSS1 and PPP2R2A and MYO18A alongside ACTN2 and ACTA2 suggesting a direct
interaction between MTSS1 and the key components of actin-stress fibers in formation of
sarcomeres [Fig.5D].
To better understand the performed RNA sequencing of EHTs seeded with TTNP22353X iPSC-
CMs comparing the transcriptional response of EHTs treated with siRNA-MTSS1 compared to
siRNA scrambled control. Unbiased analyses uncovered upregulation of genes which are known
to be involved in cardiac hypertrophy and calcium signalling such as TMEM64 and CCDC4724–26
[Fig.5E] as well as the mechanical response of cardiac fibroblasts to hypertrophy27. Importantly
we found upregulation in contractile sarcomere proteins [Fig.5F] most notably siRNA MTSS1
mediated increases in TTN (0.41 log2FC, p=4.9e-04) and MYH7 (0.29 log2FC, p=2.9e-06),
alongside decreases in inhibitory components of the sarcomere including TNNC1 the Calcium
sensing subunit of the cardiac troponin complex (-0.16 log2FC, p=0.004) and MYBPC3 (-0.11
log2FC, p=0.01). Additionally, we observed upregulation in key Calcium handling, Desmosome,
and Wnt/Hippo signalling genes and downregulation of apoptosis genes, as well as
downregulation of heart failure marker NPPA (-2.5 log2FC, p=0.05) [Fig.S10]. The transcriptional
response of increased sarcomere, calcium, and hypertrophy related genes to MTSS1
All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted August 20, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.08.14.24311020doi: medRxiv preprint
knockdown is consistent with the observation of a greater number of sarcomeres and increased
twitch force.
All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted August 20, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.08.14.24311020doi: medRxiv preprint
References
1. Akhtar MM, Lorenzini M, Cicerchia M, Ochoa JP, Hey TM, Sabater Molina M, Restrepo-
Cordoba MA, Dal Ferro M, Stolfo D, Johnson R, et al. Clinical Phenotypes and Prognosis
of Dilated Cardiomyopathy Caused by Truncating Variants in the TTN Gene. Circ Heart
Fail [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2024 Jun 12];13:E006832. Available from:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32964742/
2. Herman DS, Lam L, Taylor MRG, Wang L, Teekakirikul P, Christodoulou D, Conner L,
DePalma SR, McDonough B, Sparks E, et al. Truncations of titin causing dilated
cardiomyopathy. N Engl J Med [Internet]. 2012 [cited 2024 Jun 12];366:619–628.
Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22335739/
3. Vafiadaki E, Arvanitis DA, Sanoudou D. Muscle LIM Protein: Master regulator of cardiac
and skeletal muscle functions. Gene [Internet]. 2015 [cited 2024 Jun 12];566:1–7.
Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25936993/
4. Morley MP, Wang X, Hu R, Brandimarto J, Tucker NR, Felix JF, Smith NL, Van Der Harst
P, Ellinor PT, Margulies KB, et al. Cardioprotective Effects of MTSS1 Enhancer Variants.
Circulation [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2024 Jun 12];139:2073–2076. Available from:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31070942/
5. Aung N, Vargas JD, Yang C, Cabrera CP, Warren HR, Fung K, Tzanis E, Barnes MR,
Rotter JI, Taylor KD, et al. Genome-wide analysis of left ventricular image-derived
phenotypes identifies fourteen loci associated with cardiac morphogenesis and heart
failure development. Circulation. 2019;140:1318–1330.
6. Wild PS, Felix JF, Schillert A, Teumer A, Chen M-H, Leening MJG, Völker U, Großmann
V, Brody JA, Irvin MR, et al. Large-scale genome-wide analysis identifies genetic variants
associated with cardiac structure and function. J Clin Invest [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2019
Jul 26];127:1798–1812. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28394258
7. Levin MG, Tsao NL, Singhal P, Liu C, Vy HMT, Paranjpe I, Backman JD, Bellomo TR,
Bone WP, Biddinger KJ, et al. Genome-wide association and multi-trait analyses
characterize the common genetic architecture of heart failure. Nat Commun. 2022;13.
8. GTEx Portal [Internet]. [cited 2024 Jun 12];Available from:
https://gtexportal.org/home/gene/MTSS1
All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted August 20, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.08.14.24311020doi: medRxiv preprint
9. Nixdorf S, Grimm MO, Loberg R, Marreiros A, Russell PJ, Pienta KJ, Jackson P.
Expression and regulation of MIM (Missing In Metastasis), a novel putative metastasis
suppressor gene, and MIM-B, in bladder cancer cell lines. Cancer Lett [Internet]. 2004
[cited 2024 Jun 12];215:209–220. Available from:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15488640/
10. Dawson JC, Bruche S, Spence HJ, Braga VMM, Machesky LM. Mtss1 promotes cell-cell
junction assembly and stability through the small GTPase Rac1. PLoS One [Internet].
2012 [cited 2024 Jun 12];7. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22479308/
11. Choe D, Burke M, Brandimarto JA, Marti-Pamies I, Yob J, Yang Y, Morley MP, Drivas
TG, Day S, Damrauer S, et al. Sex-Specific Effect of MTSS1 Downregulation on Dilated
Cardiomyopathy. medRxiv Prepr Serv Heal Sci [Internet]. 2024 [cited 2024 Jun
12];Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38464240
12. Yang C, Chen F, Li S, Zeng X, Wang S, Lan J. Association of rs35006907 Polymorphism
with Risk of Dilated Cardiomyopathy in Han Chinese Population. Balkan J Med Genet
[Internet]. 2023 [cited 2024 Jun 12];26:27–34. Available from:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38711908/
13. Shah RA, Asatryan B, Sharaf Dabbagh G, Aung N, Khanji MY, Lopes LR, Van
Duijvenboden S, Holmes A, Muser D, Landstrom AP, et al. Frequency, Penetrance, and
Variable Expressivity of Dilated Cardiomyopathy-Associated Putative Pathogenic Gene
Variants in UK Biobank Participants. Circulation [Internet]. 2022 [cited 2024 Jun
12];146:110–124. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35708014/
14. Yang J, Grafton F, Ranjbarvaziri S, Budan A, Farshidfar F, Cho M, Xu E, Ho J, Maddah
M, Loewke KE, et al. Phenotypic screening with deep learning identifies HDAC6 inhibitors
as cardioprotective in a BAG3 mouse model of dilated cardiomyopathy. Sci Transl Med.
2022;14.
15. Grafton F, Ho J, Ranjbarvaziri S, Farshidfar F, Budan A, Steltzer S, Maddah M, Loewke
KE, Green K, Patel S, et al. Deep learning detects cardiotoxicity in a high-content screen
with induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes. Elife. 2021;10.
16. Toepfer CN, Sharma A, Cicconet M, Garfinkel AC, Mücke M, Neyazi M, Willcox JAL,
Agarwal R, Schmid M, Rao J, et al. SarcTrack. Circ Res. 2019;124:1172–1183.
17. Hinson JT, Chopra A, Nafissi N, Polacheck WJ, Benson CC, Swist S, Gorham J, Yang L,
All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted August 20, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.08.14.24311020doi: medRxiv preprint
Schafer S, Sheng CC, et al. HEART DISEASE. Titin mutations in iPS cells define
sarcomere insufficiency as a cause of dilated cardiomyopathy. Science [Internet]. 2015
[cited 2024 Jun 12];349:982–986. Available from:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26315439/
18. Briganti F, Sun H, Wei W, Wu J, Zhu C, Liss M, Karakikes I, Rego S, Cipriano A, Snyder
M, et al. iPSC Modeling of RBM20-Deficient DCM Identifies Upregulation of RBM20 as a
Therapeutic Strategy. Cell Rep [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2024 Jun 12];32. Available from:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32905764/
19. Fenix AM, Neininger AC, Taneja N, Hyde K, Visetsouk MR, Garde RJ, Liu B, Nixon BR,
Manalo AE, Becker JR, et al. Muscle-specific stress fibers give rise to sarcomeres in
cardiomyocytes. Elife [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2024 Aug 14];7. Available from:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30540249/
20. Kim TY, Siesser PF, Rossman KL, Goldfarb D, Mackinnon K, Yan F, Yi X, MacCoss MJ,
Moon RT, Der CJ, et al. Substrate trapping proteomics reveals targets of the
βTrCP2/FBXW11 ubiquitin ligase. Mol Cell Biol [Internet]. 2015 [cited 2024 Jun
12];35:167–181. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25332235/
21. Zhong J, Shaik S, Wan L, Tron AE, Wang Z, Sun L, Inuzuka H, Wei W. SCF β-TRCP
targets MTSS1 for ubiquitination-mediated destruction to regulate cancer cell proliferation
and migration. Oncotarget [Internet]. 2013 [cited 2024 Jun 12];4:2339–2353. Available
from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24318128/
22. Horsthemke M, Nutter LMJ, Bachg AC, Skryabin B V., Honnert U, Zobel T, Bogdan S,
Stoll M, Seidl MD, Müller FU, et al. A novel isoform of myosin 18A (Myo18Aγ) is an
essential sarcomeric protein in mouse heart. J Biol Chem. 2019;294:7202–7218.
23. Tan I, Yong J, Dong JM, Lim L, Leung T. A tripartite complex containing MRCK
modulates lamellar actomyosin retrograde flow. Cell [Internet]. 2008 [cited 2024 Aug
14];135:123–136. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18854160/
24. Schroen B, Leenders JJ, Van Erk A, Bertrand AT, Van Loon M, Van Leeuwen RE,
Kubben N, Duisters RF, Schellings MW, Janssen BJ, et al. Lysosomal integral membrane
protein 2 is a novel component of the cardiac intercalated disc and vital for load-induced
cardiac myocyte hypertrophy. J Exp Med. 2007;204:1227–1235.
25. Gomes A V., Zong C, Edmondson RD, Li X, Stefani E, Zhang J, Jones RC, Thyparambil
All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted August 20, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.08.14.24311020doi: medRxiv preprint
S, Wang GW, Qiao X, et al. Mapping the murine cardiac 26S proteasome complexes.
Circ Res. 2006;99:362–371.
26. Thapa K, Wu KC, Sarma A, Grund EM, Szeto A, Mendez AJ, Gesta S, Vishnudas VK,
Narain NR, Sarangarajan R. Dysregulation of the calcium handling protein, CCDC47, is
associated with diabetic cardiomyopathy. Cell Biosci [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2024 Jun
12];8:45. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30140426
27. Hu S, Chapski DJ, Gehred ND, Kimball TH, Gromova T, Flores A, Rowat AC, Chen J,
Packard RRS, Olszewski E, et al. Histone H1.0 couples cellular mechanical behaviors to
chromatin structure. Nat Cardiovasc Res 2024 34 [Internet]. 2024 [cited 2024 Jun
12];3:441–459. Available from: https://www.nature.com/articles/s44161-024-00460-w
28. Heidenreich PA, Bozkurt B, Aguilar D, Allen LA, Byun JJ, Colvin MM, Deswal A, Drazner
MH, Dunlay SM, Evers LR, et al. 2022 AHA/ACC/HFSA Guideline for the Management of
Heart Failure: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart
Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol [Internet].
2022 [cited 2024 Jun 12];79:e263–e421. Available from:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35379503
29. Zhang L, Kulkarni Msc P, Farshidfar F, Tingley W, Hoey T, Wang W, Phd M, Priest JR,
Figarska SM. Combining Genetic Proxies of Drug Targets and Time-to-event analyses
From Longitudinal Observational Data To Identify Target Patient Populations. medRxiv
[Internet]. 2024 [cited 2024 Jun 12];2024.06.05.24308448. Available from:
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.06.05.24308448v1
30. Wouters OJ, McKee M, Luyten J. Estimated Research and Development Investment
Needed to Bring a New Medicine to Market, 2009-2018. JAMA [Internet]. 2020 [cited
2024 Jun 12];323:844–853. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32125404/
31. Lee DSM, Cardone KM, Zhang DY, Abramowitz S, DePaolo JS, Aragam KG, Biddinger
K, Conery M, Dilitikas O, Hoffman-Andrews L, et al. Common- and rare-variant genetic
architecture of heart failure across the allele frequency spectrum. medRxiv Prepr Serv
Heal Sci [Internet]. 2023 [cited 2024 Jun 12];Available from:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37503172/
32. Hnatiuk AP, Briganti F, Staudt DW, Mercola M. Human iPSC modeling of heart disease
for drug development. Cell Chem Biol [Internet]. 2021 [cited 2024 Jun 12];28:271–282.
All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted August 20, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.08.14.24311020doi: medRxiv preprint
Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33740432/
33. Lubbers ER, Mohler PJ. Roles and regulation of protein phosphatase 2A (PP2A) in the
heart. J Mol Cell Cardiol [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2024 Jun 12];101:127–133. Available
from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27832939/
All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted August 20, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.08.14.24311020doi: medRxiv preprint
Figure 1. Lower cardiac expression of MTSS1 is associated with improved survival in TTN DCM.
A. The T allele of rs12541595 is strongly associated with lower expression of MTSS1 in left ventricular cardiac
tissue and to a lesser extent within atrial tissue (-0.28 normalized expression per T allele, p=9e-08). Data
adapted from GTeX v8 database (accessed 2/5/24). B. Among individuals in the UK Biobank with TTN P/LP
variants who developed DCM, the presence of an MTSS1 expression-lowering variant rs12541595 was
observed to confer significantly improved event-free survival from cardiovascular death or heart transplant (HR
0.29, p=0.0016) in a model adjusted for age of DCM diagnosis and genetic sex.
All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted August 20, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.08.14.24311020doi: medRxiv preprint
Figure 2. siRNA Knockdown of MTSS1 Improves the Appearance of iPSC Cardiomyocytes in Specific
siRNA Models of Monogenic DCM.
A. Diagram of experimental workflow where iPSC-CM models of monogenic DCM are treated with an siRNA
for MTSS1 followed by imaging with three separate stains (DAPI, MYBPC3, and alpha-actinin). Five images
per well are analyzed by a Matlab script to yield quantitative estimates of cellular parameters followed by
usage for training a random forest algorithm which can output the probability that a selected image is derived
from a normal cell or a model of DCM. B. 5nM siRNA-MTSS1 improves the model predicted appearance in an
All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted August 20, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.08.14.24311020doi: medRxiv preprint
siRNA TTN model of DCM. C. siRNA-MTSS1 improves the model predicted appearance in an siRNA CSRP3
model of DCM in a dose-dependent manner. D. siRNA-MTSS1 does not meaningfully improve the model
predicted appearance in an siRNA TPM1 model of DCM E. In an siRNA RBM20 model of DCM while siRNA-
MTSS1 model predicted appearance does not approach the improvement seen in siRNA TTN or siRNA
CSRP3, in model of DCM. Note: For all graphs p-values with dotted lines represent a pairwise Student’s t-test
(two sided). Shere multiple doses were tested, dashed lines with rightward arrow represent a linear model for a
dose-dependent effect of siRNA MTSS1 upon model probability.
All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted August 20, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.08.14.24311020doi: medRxiv preprint
Figure 3. siRNA Knockdown of MTSS1 Improves Contractility in iPSC-CM EHT Models of DCM
A. Engineered Heart Tissues (EHTs) seeded with iPSC-CMs carrying the TTNP22353X were treated with a
mixture of three siRNAs knockdown of MTSS1 and show a sustained improvement in twitch force relative to
the SCR control (p=0.003). In a repeat experiment individual MTSS1 siRNAs were tested and the amount of
knockdown of MTSS1 correlates with the improvement in twitch force [Fig.S5] B. EHTs seeded with WT iPSC-
CMs treated with one of four conditions (SCR control) show that co-treatment of siRNA CSRP3 (a Mendelian
cardiomyopathy gene) with a single efficacious siRNA for MTSS1 shows improvement in contractility in a dose
dependent manner (p=0.008). Note that in the pre-treatment there were no significant differences in twitch
force between dosage groups (p=0.3). siRNA MTSS1 treatment of EHTs seeded with RBM20 iPSC-CM line
carrying the S635FS mutation show dramatic improvement in contractility (p<2e-16). Dashed lines represent
the period over which p-value was calculated for the treatment effect of siRNA MTSS1 in a linear model
accounting for repeated measures over time from single wells. Red hatched area represents the two day
period of treatment with siRNA.
All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted August 20, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.08.14.24311020doi: medRxiv preprint
Figure 4. siRNA Knockdown of MTSS1 Increases Sarcomere Count in TTN and CSRP3 models of DCM.
Example outputs from the quantification assay showing the identification of individual sarcomeres (colorized)
derived from the ACTN2 and MYBPC3 staining of iPSC-CMs [Fig 2]. Nuclei and sarcomere counts per image
are displayed in inset yellow text. Note that sarcomere counts of up to 3-5 fold difference may only appear as
subtly different to the naked eye. A. An increase in sarcomeres in TTNP22353X cell line is observed with 5mM
siRNA MTSS1 treatment. B. In the siRNA TTN experimental condition, an increase in sarcomeres is observed
with 5mM siRNA MTSS1 treatment with restoration of sarcomere levels to WT cells treated with a scrambled
control. C. An increase in sarcomeres is observed to display a dose-dependent response to siRNA MTSS1 in
the siRNA-CSRP3 experimental condition. For all graphs p-values with dotted lines represent pairwise
Student’s t-test (two sided).
All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted August 20, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.08.14.24311020doi: medRxiv preprint
All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted August 20, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.08.14.24311020doi: medRxiv preprint
All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted August 20, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.08.14.24311020doi: medRxiv preprint
Figure 5. MTSS1 Displays Protein Interactions Indicative of Direct and Indirect Impact on Sarcomere
Function and Transcriptional Response of MTSS1 Knockdown by siRNA is Consistent with a Primary
Effect Upon Cardiomyocyte Contractility.
A. Confocal imaging of GFP-tagged MTSS1 in iPSC-CMs Suggests a Peri-nuclear Cytoplasmic Subcellular
Localization Without Significant Co-Localization to the Sarcomere. MTSS1 (labeled in green) is primarily visible
in the cytoplasm, without localization to the cell membrane or nucleus (blue). GFP-labeled MTSS1 does not
display significant co-localization with sarcomeres (overlay) that are clearly visualized by ACTN2 staining (red).
Note that MTSS1 localization appears to be unevenly distributed throughout the cytoplasm, with more
fluorescence observed in the center of the cell away from the periphery. B. Schematic of unbiased survey of
MTSS1 protein-protein interactions. AAV are prepared with cassettes expressing MTSS1 or GFP and a FLAG
tag under the control of the TNNT2 promoter and transfected into WT iPSC-CMs. After pull-down with an anti-
FLAG antibody, mass spectrometry compares the relative abundance of digested protein fragments from each
experiment, followed by confirmation of individual proteins with co-immunoprecipitation assays with protein-
specific antibodies. C. Volcano plot of log2 fold change (normalized to sample and fragment abundance) and
the -log p-value of enrichment in iPCS-CMs treated with AAV-MTSS1 relative to AAV-GFP. Inset boxes
represent proteins of interest including members of the PPP2 signaling complex as well as MTSS1 self-dimer,
LAMA5 and MYO18A. Purple colored dots indicate a significant number of ribosomal proteins. Data for all
enriched proteins is available in the supplement. D. Individual co-IP experiments confirmed known and
suspected interactions with ACTA and ACTN2, along with PPP2R2A and MYO18A. E. Volcano plot of the
transcriptional response of TTNP22353X EHTs treated with siRNA-MTSS1 uncovers key overexpressed genes
related to hypertrophy SCARB2 and CCDC47 F. Heatmap of transcriptional response in select sarcomere
genes in TTNP22353X EHTs treated with siRNA-MTSS1 relative to untreated TTNP22353X controls shows a robust
increase in expression of TTN (p=4.9e-04, Q=0.01) and MYH7 (p=2.9e-06, Q=0.001) and decreases in
expression of contractile inhibitory proteins TNNC1 and MYBPC3.
All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted August 20, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.08.14.24311020doi: medRxiv preprint
Figure S1: Diagnostic Information and Plots for Random Forest Prediction Models
For each Random Forest prediction model a variable importance plot is provided detailing the relative value of
each predictor in the classification performance as measured by the Gini coefficient (inequality among the values
of a frequency distribution between the siRNA-DCM and SCR groups). A confusion matrix of the model
performance on the held-out test data is also presented to show model performance.
siRNA TTN Model
Analysis area
Sarcomere Count
SD Sarcomere Length uM
Sarcomeres/Nucleus
SD Sarcomere Angle
Nuclear Count
Mean Sarcomere Pattern Strength
Mean Sarcomere Angle
Mean Sarcomere Length uM
SD Pattern Strength
Imaging Grid Picture
Mean Decrease in Gini Coefficient
Actual RF predicted
SCR
RF predicted
siTTN
SCR 36 17
siTTN 7 20
siRNA MLP Model
Mean Decrease in Gini Coefficient
Sarcomere Count
Analysis area
Mean Sarcomere Length uM
SD Sarcomere Length uM
Nuclear Count
Sarcomeres/Nucleus
Mean Sarcomere Pattern Strength
SD Pattern Strength
SD Sarcomere Angle
Mean Sarcomere Angle
Imaging Grid Picture
Actual RF predicted
SCR
RF predicted
siMLP
SCR 31 1
siMLP 1 31
siRNA TPM1 Model
Analysis area
Sarcomere Count
Nuclear Count
Mean Sarcomere Length uM
SD Sarcomere Length uM
Mean Sarcomere Pattern Strength
Sarcomeres/Nucleus
SD Pattern Strength
Mean Sarcomere Angle
SD Sarcomere Angle
Imaging Grid Picture
Mean Decrease in Gini Coefficient
Actual RF predicted
SCR
RF predicted
siTPM1
SCR 32 0
siTPM1 1 31
siRNA RBM20 Model
Mean Decrease in Gini Coefficient
SD Pattern Strength
Mean Sarcomere Pattern Strength
Mean Sarcomere Length uM
SD Sarcomere Length uM
Sarcomeres/Nucleus
Sarcomere Count
SD Sarcomere Angle
Analysis area
Nuclear Count
Mean Sarcomere Angle
Imaging Grid Picture
Actual RF predicted
SCR
RF predicted
siRBM20
SCR 31 2
siRBM20 4 29
All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted August 20, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.08.14.24311020doi: medRxiv preprint
Figure S2: Treatment of WT iPSCs-CM with siRNA for DCM Genes May Cause Mild Toxicity
The number of nuclei per image are notably lower when treated with siRNA for different monogenic DCM genes.
The siRNA-TTN experiment was performed separate from the other experimental conditions, therefore it is
plotted separately. For all graphs p-values with dotted lines represent pairwise Student’s t-test (two sided).
pANOVA = 1.7e-03
SCR 5nM
siRNA TTN 5nM
p=0.005
All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted August 20, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.08.14.24311020doi: medRxiv preprint
Figure S3: MTSS1 Knockdown by siRNA Shifts the Model Classification of iPSC-CMs Carrying
the Pathogenic Mutation TTNP22353X Causal for DCM
The random forest model from siTTN [Fig.S1] applied to high-content imaging from an isogenic TTN line treated
with siRNA MTSS1 shows a shift in model classification away from disease and towards SCR/Normal in a
statistically significant manner. For all graphs p-values with dotted lines represent pairwise Student’s t-test (two
sided).
TTN
P22353X
+
siRNA MTSS1
TTN
P22353X
+
SCR 5nM
p=0.029
All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted August 20, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.08.14.24311020doi: medRxiv preprint
Figure S4: EHTs Seeded with iPSC-CMs Carrying the Pathogenic Mutation TTNP22353X Causal for
DCM Display Reduced Twitch Force Relative to Isogenic Controls
Two independent differentiations of the TTN22353X show a sustained decrease in twitch force compared
to the WTC BSD15 line on which the mutation was created.
All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted August 20, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.08.14.24311020doi: medRxiv preprint
siSCR
siMTSS1 (1)
siMTSS1 (2)
siMTSS1 (3)
0
50
100
150
Twitch Force (μN)
Day 10 Post-siRNA
✱
siSCR
siMTSS1 (1)
siMTSS1 (2)
siMTSS1 (3)
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
Normalized MTSS1 Expression ✱✱
Figure S5: EHTs Seeded with iPSC-CMs Carrying the Pathogenic Mutation TTNP22353X Causal for
DCM Display Improvements in Twitch Force Relative to Efficacy of MTSS1 Knockdown of by
Individual siRNAs
All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted August 20, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.08.14.24311020doi: medRxiv preprint
Figure S6: Knockdown of MTSS1 by siRNA Does Not Appear to Improve iPSC-CM Models of
BAG3 DCM. A. Variable importance plot and confusion matrix of the siRNA BAG3 model performance
on held-out test data. B. The random forest model from siRNA-BAG applied to high-content imaging
from siRNA BAG3 cells shows adequate distinction between siRNA BAG and siRNA SCR control
(p=3.1e-05) and no shift in model classification in siRNA-BAG3 treated with siRNA MTSS1 (p=0.25). C.
Heterozygous BAG3 knockout EHTs treated with siRNA MTSS1 appear to show lower twitch force than
untreated cells. D. A detail of the day 10 timepoint for EHTs in panel C. For all graphs p-values with
dotted lines represent pairwise Student’s t-test (two sided).
siRNA BAG3 Model
Mean Sarcomere Length uM
Analysis area
SD Sarcomere Length uM
Nuclear Count
Sarcomeres/Nucleus
Mean Sarcomere Angle
SD Sarcomere Angle
Sarcomere Count
SD Pattern Strength
Mean Sarcomere Pattern Strength
Imaging Grid Picture
Mean Decrease in Gini Coefficient
Actual RF predicted
SCR
RF predicted
siBAG3
SCR 29 16
siBAG3 92 221
siRNA BAG3 siRNA BAG3
+
5nM siMTSS1
siRNA SCR
p=3.1e-05
p=0.25
-5 0 5 10 15
0
20
40
60
Days
Twitch Force (μN) BAG3+/- + siSCR
BAG3+/- + siMTSS1
0
20
40
60
Twitch Force (μN)
BAG3+/- + siSCR
BAG3+/- + siMTSS1
ns (P=0.236)
Day 10 Post-siRNA
A. B.
C. D.
0
20
40
60
Twitch Force (μN)
BAG3+/- + siSCR
BAG3+/- + siMTSS1
ns (P=0.236)
Day 10 Post-siRNA
p=0.24
10 Day Timepoint
All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted August 20, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.08.14.24311020doi: medRxiv preprint
Figure S7: A Meta-Analysis of Quantitative Data Across Experimental Conditions Indicates that
an Increased Number of Sarcomeres is a Shared Response of iPSC-CMs to siRNA Knockdown
of MTSS1
For each of multiple experimental conditions and cell lines, sarcomere count was normalized to the condition and
the effect of siRNA knockdown of MTSS1 analyzed. The standardized results from the analysis of each
condition/cell line was included in a meta-analysis showing that across experimental conditions and cell types,
knockdown of MTSS1 reproducibly and robustly resulted in an increase in the number of sarcomeres in both a
common (p<0.0001) and random effects (p=0.0003) methods for meta-analysis.
Experimental condition
All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted August 20, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.08.14.24311020doi: medRxiv preprint
Figure S8: MTSS1 Is Expressed In Multiple Cell Types within the Heart and Does Not Have
Known Binding Partners Related to Sarcomere Biology
A. Single cell expression of MTSS1 accessed from the human protein atlas shows moderate expression of
MTSS1 in select groups of Cardiomyocytes and Endothelial cells within the heart and relatively low expression
within Fibroblasts. B. Two protein-protein interaction maps (limited to experimental confirmation of physical
interactions described in the scientific literature) identifies known interactors with MTSS1 from the STRING and
BioGRID databases—no cardiomyocyte specific proteins are idenfied, though ACTA1 is known to have a role in
both cardiomyocyte and skeletal myocyte sarcomere function.
Single Cell Expression of MTSS1
Human Protein Atlas (accessed 5/30/24)
https://www.proteinatlas.org/ENSG00000170873 -MTSS1/single+cell+type
Known Protein Interactors with MTSS1
STRING DB (accessed 5/30/24)
https://string-db.org
BioGRID (accessed 5/30/24)
https://thebiogrid.org/115132/summary/homo -sapiens/mtss1.html
A.
B.
All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted August 20, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.08.14.24311020doi: medRxiv preprint
Figure S9: Transcriptional response of TTNP22353X EHTs Encompasses Changes Across
Pathways Related to Calcium Handling, Cellular Signalling, and Structure
A. Heatmap of SCR vs. siRNA-MTSS1 related transcriptional response organized by functional gene list.
B. Select genes of interest representing key transcriptional drivers of pathways related to Calcium handling,
Desmosome and Cell Junctions, and Wnt Hippo signalling. Of note heart failure marker NPPA is decreased
in TTNP22353X EHTs by siRNA MTSS1
Mitocohondrial dynamics
Hippo pathway
Adipocytic pathway
Sodium channels
Cell junctions
Calcium handling
Wnt pathway
Glucose oxidation
Fatty acid oxidation
Fibrosis signaling
Apoptosis
SCR
siRNA MTSSS1
Gene T statistic p.value Mean
siSCR
Mean
siMTSS1 Log2FC Q Gene Group
MYH7 14.1 0.000003 11.1 11.5 0.39 0.002 Sarcomeric
HK1 13.9 0.000003 8.5 8.8 0.35 0.002 Glucose_oxidation
DSP 11.5 0.000012 6.0 6.5 0.43 0.002 Desmosome
MOB1A 10.8 0.000306 5.1 5.7 0.53 0.008 Hippo_pathway
PIK3CA 10.7 0.000013 3.0 3.3 0.34 0.002 Rhoa
ROCK1 10.6 0.000036 4.2 4.7 0.45 0.003 Rhoa
MFN2 10.0 0.000043 6.7 7.6 0.95 0.003 Mitochondria_dynamics
SLC2A1 9.4 0.000038 8.1 9.3 1.15 0.003 Glucose_oxidation
GSK3B 8.9 0.001329 4.3 4.7 0.39 0.019 Wnt_pathway
DSG2 8.8 0.000093 4.1 4.6 0.53 0.005 Desmosome
RYR2 8.5 0.000169 6.9 7.5 0.54 0.006 Ca_handling
APC 8.5 0.000228 2.4 2.8 0.43 0.007 Wnt_pathway
CFL2 8.4 0.000069 8.4 8.8 0.38 0.004 Rhoa
CASQ2 8.3 0.011907 8.2 8.5 0.35 0.078 Ca_handling
ANK2 8.1 0.000277 5.1 5.6 0.48 0.008 Ca_handling
DES 7.9 0.000106 8.9 9.3 0.44 0.005 Desmosome
OPA1 7.8 0.000219 5.4 5.8 0.40 0.007 Mitochondria_dynamics
PPARGC1A 7.3 0.000282 5.4 5.9 0.46 0.008 Adipocyte_pathway
BAX -9.7 9.9E-05 6.9 6.5 -0.39 0.004 Apoptosis
NPPA -2.5 0.05 11.7 11.5 -0.22 0.20 Heart Failure
Marker
RBM20 3.9 0.007 5.2 5.4 0.25 0.06 Cardiomyocyte
spicing co-factor
BAG3 5.1 0.001 7.2 7.4 0.27 0.02 Protein QC
A. B.
Log2 Fold Expression Change
All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted August 20, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.08.14.24311020doi: medRxiv preprint