Clinical significance of predictive and diagnostic indices of fetal pathology associated with placental insufficiency in women with endometriosis

In: Journal of obstetrics and women's diseases · 2021 · vol. 70(5) , pp. 37–48 · doi:10.17816/jowd58314 · W3211286457
article OA: closed CC0
View on OpenAlex View at publisher
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-07

This study developed predictive and diagnostic indices for fetal pathology in pregnancies complicated by endometriosis, finding PI I and DI I to be the most informative for risk stratification and timely intervention.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-07

This prospective study evaluated whether predictive (PIs) and diagnostic indices (DIs) of placenta-associated fetal pathology could be developed in 175 pregnant women with endometriosis (100 with adenomyosis and 75 with ovarian endometriosis), compared with 30 healthy controls, using repeated clinical and laboratory assessments at 10–14, 20–24, and 28–34 weeks. Using ROC analysis and odds ratio–based approaches, the authors found that pregnancy complicated by placental insufficiency occurred in 100% of women with endometriosis, with fetal pathology in 81.5% of cases, and that the frequency differed significantly between adenomyosis and ovarian endometriosis groups; they proposed PI I (PlGF/TNFα×100) and PI II (PAMG-1/PlGF×100) for predicting growth retardation and/or chronic fetal hypoxia, and DI I (CRP/PAPh×100), DI II (HbF/PlGF×100), and DI III (L CD95+/PAPh×100) for earlier diagnosis of fetal pathology linked to impaired placental energy supply under inflammatory conditions. They reported the highest information values for PI I (Se 86.1%, Sp 80.5%) and DI I (Se 88.3%, Sp 83.7%), with the explicit caveat that diagnostic and predictive index development depended on retrospectively selected comparison groups “isolated from other pregnancy complications.” This paper is centrally about endometriosis — it develops and tests PI/DI tools for fetal pathology associated with placental insufficiency in pregnancies complicated by adenomyosis and ovarian endometriosis.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Modern achievements of pharmacology, surgery and reproductive medicine have determined an increase in the implementation of reproductive function in endometriosis of various localization. The onset of pregnancy in presence of impaired endometrial receptivity and progesterone resistance, pro-inflammatory and pro-thrombotic status, abnormal functioning of the immune system, structural changes in the reproductive organs leads to impaired formation of the embryo (feto) placental system, early reproductive losses, complicated pregnancy and adverse perinatal outcomes. In this regard, the endometriosis and pregnancy issue requires close study and specific proposals to optimize pregnancy management. AIM: The aim of this study was to develop predictive (PIs) and diagnostic (DIs) indices of placenta-associated fetal pathology in pregnant women with endometriosis, to determine their prognostically and diagnostically significant parameters. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective study in the dynamics of gestation included a comprehensive clinical and laboratory examination of 175 pregnant women with endometriosis (100 subjects with adenomyosis and 75 subjects with ovarian endometriosis). To develop PIs and DIs, two comparison groups with fetal pathology due to placental insufficiency were retrospectively identified, depending on the location of endometriosis. Group I consisted of 49 pregnant women with adenomyosis and placental insufficiency isolated from other pregnancy complications, accompanied by growth retardation and/or chronic fetal hypoxia; Group II comprised 29 pregnant women with ovarian endometriosis and placental insufficiency isolated from other pregnancy complications, accompanied by growth retardation and/or chronic fetal hypoxia. The control group (Group III) included 30 healthy pregnant women with a normal course of gestation. The examination was performed at 10-14 weeks, 20-24 weeks, and 28-34 weeks of gestation and included an assessment of placental insufficiency markers such as placental growth factor (PlGF), placental -1-microglobulin (PAMG-1), tumor necrosis factor (TNF), lymphocytes with membrane receptor FasR (L CD95+), C-reactive protein, placental alkaline phosphatase (PAPh), and fetal hemoglobin (HbF). The information value of individual parameters and indices was determined by ROC analysis, odds ratio, and clinical epidemiology tests. RESULTS: Pregnancy in presence of endometriosis in 100% of cases was complicated by placental insufficiency of varying severity (with fetal pathology in 81.5% of cases), the frequency of which had statistically significant differences between the groups of pregnant women with adenomyosis and ovarian endometriosis (2 = 4.06, p = 0.04). To predict growth retardation and / or chronic fetal hypoxia, we have developed PI I (PlGF / TNF 100) and PI II (PAMG-1 / PlGF 100), which characterize the state of placental angio-and vasculogenesis depending on systemic inflammatory response level. For early diagnosis of fetal pathology, we have proposed DI I (CRP / PAPh 100), DI II (HbF / PlGF 100) and DI III (L CD95+ / PAPh 100), which allow for diagnosing placental alterations with impaired placental energy supply due to an increase in inflammatory status. Evaluation of prognostic and diagnostic significance of PIs and DIs showed that the most informative tools are PI I (Se = 86.1%, Sp = 80.5%) and DI I (Se = 88.3%, Sp = 83.7%). CONCLUSIONS: The use of PIs allows for risk stratification of pregnant women from the 1st trimester of gestation to address the issue of the prevention method. The clinical capabilities of DIs optimize obstetric tactics for the timely prescription of therapy for placental insufficiency and targeted diagnosis of fetal pathology. Pregnant women with endometriosis should be classified as a high perinatal risk group, and therefore the proposed PIs and DIs should be included in the dynamic examination complex.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Condition tags

endometriosisadenomyosis

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (16)

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-06-02T02:00:03.124865+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK