Utility and diagnostic accuracy of fallopian tube touch imprint cytology

other OA: closed public-domain-us
View on PubMed View at publisher
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-13

Fallopian tube touch imprint cytology smears demonstrated high diagnostic accuracy (97%) in distinguishing tube from non-tube structures compared to histology.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the diagnostic accuracy of cytology smears in distinguishing between tube and non-tube structures. METHODS: One hundred cytology smears of fallopian tube and non-tube structures (vessels, round and ovarian ligaments) were prepared from surgically removed uterus and fallopian tube specimens and stained by the Papanicolaou method. The slides were reviewed blindly by pathologists and interpreted as tube or non-tube structures. The results were compared to the histological examination of the same specimens. FINDINGS: Results indicated an overall accuracy of 97% with a specificity of 98% and sensitivity of 96% for cytology smears, taking histology as the gold standard. Positive and negative predictive values were 96.1% and 97.9%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Cytology smears are a convenient and cost effective tool for laboratory confirmation of tubal sterilization. This method can reduce the costs of laboratory examination, especially in developing countries, where tubal sterilizations are done in large cohorts. However, histological slides remain the gold standard in cases of medicolegal problems.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Condition tags

endometriosis

MeSH descriptors

Carcinoma Cytodiagnosis Cytodiagnosis Cytodiagnosis Endometriosis Fallopian Tube Neoplasms Fallopian Tubes Adult Carcinoma Cohort Studies Endometriosis Fallopian Tube Neoplasms Fallopian Tube Neoplasms Fallopian Tubes Female Humans Middle Aged Predictive Value of Tests Sterilization, Tubal Sterilization, Tubal

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-07-07T06:07:59.301721+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-05-13T22:15:29.922408+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-06-13T06:42:57.164913+00:00
License: public-domain-us · commercial use OK · attribution required
Courtesy of the U.S. National Library of Medicine