Is there any Royal College guidance for the long-term use of GnRH analogues, i.e., more than 6 months, in endometriosis or uterine fibroids?

article OA: green CC0
AI-generated summary by gemini-2.5-flash-lite, 2026-07-17

No specific Royal College guidance exists for long-term GnRH analogue use in endometriosis or uterine fibroids, though indirect guidance highlights the need for careful management with add-back therapy.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by qwen3.7-flash, 2026-09-08 · read from full text

This review investigated the existence of Royal College guidance regarding the long-term administration of GnRH analogues for more than six months in patients with endometriosis or uterine fibroids. The authors found no direct evidence of specific Royal College guidelines addressing this extended duration of therapy. Instead, indirect sources highlight the necessity of careful clinical management, particularly the use of add-back therapy to mitigate adverse side effects associated with prolonged treatment. Relevance to endometriosis: listed as one indication for GnRH antagonists, though the paper's main focus is uterine fibroids.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

No direct evidence for Royal College guidance on the long-term use of GnRH analogues for endometriosis or uterine fibroids was identified; indirect sources emphasize careful management, including add-back therapy, to mitigate side effects.
Full text 618 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Published July 13, 2026 | Version v1 Other Open Is there any Royal College guidance for the long-term use of GnRH analogues, i.e., more than 6 months, in endometriosis or uterine fibroids? Description No direct evidence for Royal College guidance on the long-term use of GnRH analogues for endometriosis or uterine fibroids was identified; indirect sources emphasize careful management, including add-back therapy, to mitigate side effects. Files 86add0ff-319a-4c3f-95b2-b2ed34cfae28.pdf Files (18.6 kB) | Name | Size | Download all | |---|---|---| | md5:dc39c2536edd28635468af37fb2fac03 | 18.6 kB | Preview Download |

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-09-17T06:03:51.838633+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK