Trends in aquatic environmental DNA research in Alaska
preprint
OA: closed
CC-BY-NC-SA-4.0
Abstract
Environmental DNA (eDNA) analysis is an emerging tool with significant potential to advance biomonitoring, particularly in remote and logistically challenging environments. To evaluate the state of eDNA research in Alaska, we conducted a literature review and a regional survey. The review identified 22 peer-reviewed studies published between 2010 and 2025, while the survey of 54 individuals representing state, federal, academic, tribal, and nonprofit organizations (46 responses) captured information on ongoing and unpublished projects. Our literature review and survey results reveal that most published and ongoing studies in Alaska employ eDNA metabarcoding to assess community assemblages, species distributions, and biodiversity patterns. However, respondents reported several barriers to implementation, including limited funding, infrastructure, and assay availability, as well as uncertainty in laboratory selection, sampling protocols, and data analysis. Despite these challenges, cross-sector collaborations are developing. Within the growing effort to harness eDNA as a management tool, collaborations with subsistence harvesters are in the forefront of using eDNA for management purposes. This study provides the first comprehensive overview of eDNA research in Alaska, identifies key data gaps, and offers examples of co-production of knowledge currently underway in the state. Frameworks developed in Alaska may inform the advancement of remote biomonitoring programs globally.
Full text
2,269 characters
· extracted from
oa-doi-fallback
· click to expand
This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 1 of this Preprint.
You must log in to post a comment.
There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article.
This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 1 of this Preprint.
Add a Comment
You must log in to post a comment.
Comments
There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article.
Environmental DNA (eDNA) analysis is an emerging tool with significant potential to advance biomonitoring, particularly in remote and logistically challenging environments. To evaluate the state of eDNA research in Alaska, we conducted a literature review and a regional survey. The review identified 22 peer-reviewed studies published between 2010 and 2025, while the survey of 54 individuals representing state, federal, academic, tribal, and nonprofit organizations (46 responses) captured information on ongoing and unpublished projects. Our literature review and survey results reveal that most published and ongoing studies in Alaska employ eDNA metabarcoding to assess community assemblages, species distributions, and biodiversity patterns. However, respondents reported several barriers to implementation, including limited funding, infrastructure, and assay availability, as well as uncertainty in laboratory selection, sampling protocols, and data analysis. Despite these challenges, cross-sector collaborations are developing. Within the growing effort to harness eDNA as a management tool, collaborations with subsistence harvesters are in the forefront of using eDNA for management purposes. This study provides the first comprehensive overview of eDNA research in Alaska, identifies key data gaps, and offers examples of co-production of knowledge currently underway in the state. Frameworks developed in Alaska may inform the advancement of remote biomonitoring programs globally.
https://doi.org/10.32942/X2VQ0M
Life Sciences
management, biomonitoring, biodiversity, Arctic, subarctic, co-production
Published: 2025-12-16 10:13
Last Updated: 2025-12-16 10:13
CC-BY Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International
Data and Code Availability Statement:
Open data/code are not available due to survey results.
Language:
English
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Ask this paper
Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-05-28T02:00:01.590549+00:00
License: CC-BY-NC-SA-4.0