Smoking cessation in pregnant women using financial incentives: a feasibility study.

preprint OA: gold CC-BY-4.0
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

Background: The high prevalence of smoking pregnant women in Dutch areas with lower socioeconomic status and the consecutively harmful exposure to tobacco to both mother and child, depicted a high need for a novel intervention. According to other studies, the utilisation of financial incentives appeared to be a promising method for smoking cessation in pregnant women. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the feasibility of implementing contingent financial incentives as smoking cessation support for pregnant women in the Netherlands. Methods: Feasibility study consisting of four developmental phases: (1) acceptability of Dutch population regarding financial-incentive-intervention by conducting an online questionnaire, (2) composing a pilot study utilising the financial-incentive-intervention in clinical practice, (3) execution of the composed pilot study and (4) evaluation of the executed pilot study utilising a mixed-methods approach. A financial-incentive-intervention, given in a contingent financial scheme (during five consequential appointments, respectively €25/€50/€100/€150/€250), if smoking abstinence was proven by the amount of cotinine in the urine of the pregnant women measured utilising a urine dipstick test.The public acceptability for the financial-incentive-intervention was assessed using 5-Likert scales. The number of pregnant women able to abstain from smoking during the pilot study and utilising the financial-incentive-intervention in clinical practice were used to assess the prosperity and practicality of the pilot study respectively. The pilot study was evaluated using a mixed-methods approach. Results: In total, 55.1% of the Dutch population sample (n=328) found a financial incentive inappropriate for smoking cessation in pregnant women, while the healthcare professionals and pilot study participants thought the financial-incentive-intervention to be a helpful approach. Eleven vouchers were given during the pilot study, and one woman completed all test points and tested negative for cotinine at the end of the pilot study. Conclusion: Although the financial-incentive-intervention appeared to be a promising approach for smoking cessation in pregnant women, the acceptability of the Dutch population and the number of pregnant women able to abstain smoking during this pilot study was low. Despite the limited study population, this study proved the concept of this financial-incentive-intervention to be feasible for implementation in the Netherlands. Trial registration: Not applicable since this is a feasibility study prior to a trial.
Full text 174,748 characters · extracted from preprint-html · click to expand
Smoking cessation in pregnant women using financial incentives: a feasibility study. | Research Square window.SnipcartSettings = { analytics: { enabled: false } }; (function() { var accessVector = localStorage.getItem('access_vector') || ''; window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; if (accessVector) { window.dataLayer.push({ user: { profile: { profileInfo: { snid: accessVector } } } }); } })(); (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src='https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-K279D39R'); Browse Preprints In Review Journals COVID-19 Preprints AJE Video Bytes Research Tools Research Promotion AJE Professional Editing AJE Rubriq About Preprint Platform In Review Editorial Policies Our Team Advisory Board Help Center Sign In Submit a Preprint Cite Share Download PDF Research Article Smoking cessation in pregnant women using financial incentives: a feasibility study. T. A. Kroder, L. L. Peters, A. Roggeveld, M. Holtrop, L. Harshagen, and 2 more This is a preprint; it has not been peer reviewed by a journal. https://doi.org/ 10.21203/rs.3.rs-1652235/v1 This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License Status: Under Review Version 1 posted 9 You are reading this latest preprint version Abstract Background The high prevalence of smoking pregnant women in Dutch areas with lower socioeconomic status and the consecutively harmful exposure to tobacco to both mother and child, depicted a high need for a novel intervention. According to other studies, the utilisation of financial incentives appeared to be a promising method for smoking cessation in pregnant women. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the feasibility of implementing contingent financial incentives as smoking cessation support for pregnant women in the Netherlands. Methods Feasibility study consisting of four developmental phases: (1) acceptability of Dutch population regarding financial-incentive-intervention by conducting an online questionnaire, (2) composing a pilot study utilising the financial-incentive-intervention in clinical practice, (3) execution of the composed pilot study and (4) evaluation of the executed pilot study utilising a mixed-methods approach. A financial-incentive-intervention, given in a contingent financial scheme (during five consequential appointments, respectively €25/€50/€100/€150/€250), if smoking abstinence was proven by the amount of cotinine in the urine of the pregnant women measured utilising a urine dipstick test. The public acceptability for the financial-incentive-intervention was assessed using 5-Likert scales. The number of pregnant women able to abstain from smoking during the pilot study and utilising the financial-incentive-intervention in clinical practice were used to assess the prosperity and practicality of the pilot study respectively. The pilot study was evaluated using a mixed-methods approach. Results In total, 55.1% of the Dutch population sample (n=328) found a financial incentive inappropriate for smoking cessation in pregnant women, while the healthcare professionals and pilot study participants thought the financial-incentive-intervention to be a helpful approach. Eleven vouchers were given during the pilot study, and one woman completed all test points and tested negative for cotinine at the end of the pilot study. Conclusion Although the financial-incentive-intervention appeared to be a promising approach for smoking cessation in pregnant women, the acceptability of the Dutch population and the number of pregnant women able to abstain smoking during this pilot study was low. Despite the limited study population, this study proved the concept of this financial-incentive-intervention to be feasible for implementation in the Netherlands. Trial registration: Not applicable since this is a feasibility study prior to a trial. financial incentives feasibility study smoking cessation pregnancy contingent public acceptability intervention cotinine Figures Figure 1 Figure 2 Background Exposure to tobacco during pregnancy is harmful to both mother and child. Smoking during pregnancy increases the risk of short- and long term complications, such as miscarriage, pre-term birth, and the development of lung diseases like asthma in the child’s later life [1–3]. In the Netherlands, several smoking cessation interventions support pregnant women to stop smoking and preventing them from relapsing after their pregnancies. In the Trimbos Guideline Smoking cessation counselling, these interventions can be provided by several healthcare professionals and are divided into psychosocial interventions (e.g. personal counselling, either face-to-face or by telephone) and pharmacological interventions (e.g. nicotine replacements) [4,5]. Although the overall percentage of pregnant women smoking in the Netherlands has decreased in the last couple of years, the prevalence remains higher in areas with lower socioeconomic status (SES), like the three Northern provinces (Groningen, Friesland, and Drenthe) [6–8]. The province of Groningen, for example, showed varying percentages per municipality from 5.5 to 19.8% in 2019, while the overall percentage of pregnant women who smoked at any point during their pregnancy in the Netherlands was 7.4% in 2018 [9–11]. These high percentages demonstrate a high need for a novel and innovative method that is more effective among these groups. A promising method is giving financial incentives for the smoking cessation of pregnant women. Studies conducted in the United States and the United-Kingdom reported that this method stimulates women to quit smoking and decreases the overall percentage of women smoking during and after pregnancy [12,13]. A study conducted in the United-Kingdom showed that women who received financial incentives were more likely to quit smoking during (22.5% vs 8.6%) and after (15.0% vs 4.0%) their pregnancy compared to women who received standard intervention methods (OR 2.63; 95% CI 1.73-4.01) [13]. The women participating in this study received incentives with a maximum of 400 pounds (converted being approximately €467) per participant, and the study used carbon monoxide breath tests and cotinine saliva assays to confirm the participants’ non-smoking status. A meta-analysis demonstrated that contingent incentives also have a higher motivating effect and resulted in a larger group of participants who stopped smoking compared to non-contingent incentives (21.4% vs 5.9%, respectively) [12]. Notwithstanding the positive outcomes of using financial incentives, it seems that other factors that could potentially influence the results of such an intervention should be investigated before implementing it. One factor that could negatively influence the intervention’s execution is the public acceptability in the society where the intervention will be implemented. Other studies have reported the importance of investigating public acceptability in order to implement such an intervention successfully in clinical practice [14,15]. To our knowledge, no other study has investigated the public acceptability of the Dutch population about financial incentives for smoking cessation in pregnant women. Concluding, this study aimed to investigate the feasibility of implementing contingent incentives as smoking cessation support in the Northern Netherlands. The project contained four developmental phases to ensure optimal implementation of the financial-incentive-intervention in clinical practice. Firstly, the Dutch population’s public acceptability for financial incentives was assessed by conducting an online questionnaire. Secondly, this study attempted to develop a financial-incentive-intervention that stimulates pregnant women to quit smoking and thirdly executed the implementation in clinical practice. Fourthly, the financial-incentive-intervention was evaluated after implementation in clinical practice, and this included both the perspectives of healthcare professionals and participants themselves. Methods Feasibility study The theory of Bowen et al. (2009) was used to assess the feasibility of this implementation study of contingent incentives for smoking cessation support [16]. This theory consists of four developmental phases; acceptability, composing, implementation and evaluation of the feasibility in clinical practice. The first phase comprised exploration of the Dutch population’s perspectives regarding the financial-incentive-intervention by conducting an online questionnaire. These results provided input for the consecutive second phase, in which a study design was composed for a pilot study, including the financial-incentive-intervention. The third phase comprised the execution of this pilot study, followed by the fourth phase, which incorporated an evaluation of the pilot study in clinical practice, utilising both healthcare professionals and pregnant women’s perspectives. Phase 1: Acceptability With an online questionnaire, the public acceptability of the Dutch population for the financial-incentive-intervention was assessed. The online questionnaire comprised 23 items regarding the opinion of the financial-incentive-intervention and its actual implementation. The online questionnaire was developed via Qualtrics, and the anonymous link was distributed amongst the Dutch community through 5 personal Facebook sites of students of Medical Sciences to 59 of their acquaintances or unknowns. Facebook was chosen as medium, since it is fairly easy to recruit via this way and it can be used to create a large reach in the Netherlands among different population groups. The questionnaire comprised of eight sociodemographic questions (e.g. gender, education, and smoking status), ten statements concerning smoking cessation support for pregnant women (e.g. “Pregnant women may receive financial incentives if they stop smoking during their pregnancy”) and five questions concerning the design of a financial-incentive intervention (e.g. “In what form should the financial incentive be given?”). The ten statements could be scored according to a 5-Likert scale, ranging from “strongly agree” to “strongly disagree” (see Additional file 1). The online questionnaire results were analysed by using descriptive statistics. Statistical differences between different sociodemographic groups (gender, age, education, smoking status, and (former) pregnant women and their partners) were calculated by Student T-tests, ANOVAs, Mann-Whitney U and Kruskal-Wallis tests, where appropriate. The data were analysed utilising SPSS Statistics version 23.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Phase 2: Composing a Pilot study Based on a similar study by Cahill et al. (2015) on incentives for smoking cessation, the financial incentives were offered in vouchers that could be spent in a widely known baby store in multiple cities spread across the Netherlands [12]. The financial incentives would be provided to the recruited pregnant women during five scheduled appointments if the measured amount of cotinine proved smoking abstinence in the urine of the pregnant women by means of a urine dipstick test (Drug test Drug-Detect Nicotine (Cotinine), 200 nanogram/mL) [17]. Studies described cotinine urine dipstick tests as a valid means of detecting smoking cessation in participants [18,19]. Furthermore, these studies showed that cotinine in the urine could still be detected for two to four days after smoking, enabling more reliable detection of the smoking status of the included pregnant women in our study. The pilot study’s financial scheme was based on the results of Phase 1 and a published review by Cahill et al. [12]. A €25 voucher could be obtained during the first study appointment, which included a cotinine urine test plus a semi-structured interview to gain more information about the participants’ sociodemographic characteristics and factors that could influence smoking cessation, such as home situation and social support. The four consecutive appointments primarily encompassed cotinine urine tests, for which €50/€100/€150/€250 vouchers could be obtained respectively, bringing the total amount to be received in vouchers up to €575,-. The vouchers were given according to a contingent financial scheme, meaning the amount of money increased each time a pregnant woman tested negative for the cotinine urine test, as shown in Figure 1. The voucher could not be obtained if the pregnant woman tested positive, implicating the total amount of money could not be reached anymore by this woman. The study appointments were scheduled with two researchers at the University Medical Center Groningen (UMCG), and were preferably combined with their usual care appointments. The appointments were aimed to be scheduled every three weeks, consecutive leading to the pilot study lasting approximately ten to fourteen weeks per participant. Phase 3: Execution Pilot study The pilot study implemented the financial-incentive-intervention in clinical practice. The smoking pregnant women were recruited in the city of Groningen at three locations, a universal hospital (University Medical Centre Groningen; UMCG), a general hospital (Martini Hospital Groningen; MZH), and a primary-care midwifery practice (Verloskundige Stadspraktijk Groningen; VSP). The women were recruited in the period March-May 2019. Healthcare professionals (midwives, medical nurses, n=9), who were employed at the abovementioned locations, identified eligible smoking pregnant women at their first appointment and informed them about the pilot study. In case of the women’s eligibility and interest, the researchers contacted them to give further information and recruit them afterwards. Informed consent was given by each participant. Women were included if they were older than 17 years of age, gestational age < 30 weeks, self-reported smoking at the time of the first appointment, and were motivated to quit smoking. Pregnant women utilising nicotine replacements were excluded, as previous studies stated that this form of nicotine could be harmful during pregnancy [20,21]. The study protocol was approved by the Medical Ethics Research Committee of the UMCG (nr 201800826). The study was conducted in accordance with Good Clinical Practice guidelines and regulations. Phase 4: Evaluation of Pilot study The pilot study was evaluated using a mixed-methods approach. Firstly, five healthcare professionals were asked in contact about their experiences with the financial-incentive-intervention pilot study and their suggestions for future implication of the financial-incentive-intervention. Particularly, healthcare professionals perspectives on the feasibility of the pilot study were collected. Next, a standardised questionnaire was utilised to obtain data about the included pregnant women’s pilot study experiences. During the participant’s last study appointment, the pregnant women were invited for their last cotinine urine test and asked to complete a standardised questionnaire. This questionnaire contained items about experiences during the pilot study’s inclusion and consecutive execution, their opinion about financial incentives for smoking cessation for pregnant women, and their suggestions for future studies. Moreover, all included women were asked to participate in a semi-structured interview at the first study appointment. During the interviews women’s individual experiences with smoking cessation interventions were discussed even as their smoking behaviour, pregnancy and social status. Also the support and perceptions of their partners regarding smoking cessation interventions were discussed, if applicable. The interviews were digitally recorded and transcribed verbatim and analysed utilising ATLAS.ti (ATLAS.ti Scientific Software Development GmbH. ATLAS.ti for Windows, version 5.2.18) [22]. Furthermore, the prosperity of implementing the financial-incentive-intervention in clinical practice was assessed at the end of the pilot study by affirming the number of pregnant women able to abstain from smoking during the pilot study. Lastly, an evaluation of the pilot study’s practicality was performed by looking in retrospect at the number of women using the financial-incentive-intervention in clinical practice. Results Phase 1: Acceptability In total, 409 individuals responded to the online questionnaire. Figure 2 shows a total of 328 responses were included in the analyses to assess the Dutch population’s acceptability of financial incentives for smoking cessation in pregnant women. In total 81 responses were excluded from the analysis due to duplications (n=2), missing values on all items (n=36) or not answering all of the ten statements concerning smoking cessation support for pregnant women (n=43). Table 1 shows the respondent’s characteristics. The majority of the respondents were female (n=266, 81.1%) and between 20-29 years (n=133, 40.5%). Most of the respondents had high education (n=213, 64.9%) and had never been pregnant (n=194, 59.1%). Furthermore, approximately half of the respondents or their partners were smoking (n=86, 26.2%) or had smoked in the past (n=80, 24.4%). The sequent part of the questionnaire comprised ten statements concerning smoking cessation support for pregnant women. The results showed large disunity among the respondents. Respondents indicated that they consider financial incentives a controversial intervention and are both positive and negative towards various aspects of the implementation of the financial-incentive-intervention. The importance of smoking cessation for pregnant women was affirmed by the vast majority of the respondents (n=298, 90.9%). Furthermore, the majority of the respondents considered it feasible for pregnant women to quit smoking, both during and after the pregnancy (respectively n=268, 82.0%, and n=238, 72.8%). In total, 170 (51.8%) of the respondents indicated that they totally disagreed to disagreed with the statement for rewarding pregnant women with financial incentives if they quit smoking during their pregnancy. Additionally, half of the respondents (totally) disagreed with the possible implementation of the financial-incentive-intervention (n=178, 54.3%), and a quarter (n=80, 24.4%) of the respondents (totally) agreed with this statement. The last five questions of the questionnaire concerned the design of the financial-incentive-intervention. The results showed that 55.1% of the respondents (n=179) thought it was inappropriate to give a financial incentive for smoking cessation, compared to 31.7% of the respondents (n=103) who did think it was an appropriate intervention and 13.2% (n=43) of the respondents who were not sure whether it was appropriate or inappropriate. Approximately one third (n=103, 31.4%) of the respondents thought it was feasible for the women to stop smoking using the financial-incentive-intervention, while one third (n=108, 33.0%) thought it was not feasible, and one third (n=117, 35.6%) did not know whether it was feasible. Furthermore, the respondents were asked who should help pregnant women stop smoking. The most chosen option was an addiction medicine physician (n=114, 37.9%), followed by a general practitioner (n=54, 17.9%), a midwife (n=45, 15.0%), a general practice-based nursing specialist (n=42, 14.0%), a gynaecologist (n=13, 4.3%), a combination of healthcare professionals and family or partner, (n=12, 4.0%) and the pregnant woman herself (n=9, 3.0%). In case the financial-incentive-intervention would be implemented, most respondents felt the amount of money should be between €0-€100 (n=32, 31.1%), between €100-€200 (n=33, 32.0%) or between €200-300 (n=16, 15.3%). Furthermore, it was believed by a large group of respondents that the financial incentives could best be given in the form of vouchers (n=120, 38.6%). Around half of the respondents (n=158, 49.8%) believed it would then be best to give the complete reimbursement at the end of the pilot study, while 37.5% (n=119) believed the reimbursement should be incremental amounts during the pilot study and 12.6% (n=40) believed the reimbursement should be distributed equally during the pilot study. Table 1. Sociodemographic characteristics of respondent’s participating in online questionnaire (Phase 1)(n=328). RESPONDENTS CHARACTERISTICS Total population N=328, 100% N (%) Gender Male Female 62 (18.9) 266 (81.1) Age (years) < 20 20-29 30-39 40-49 50-59 ≥ 60 22 (6.7) 133 (40.5) 52 (15.9) 66 (20.1) 36 (11.0) 19 (5.8) Education 1 Low Medium High 13 (4.0) 102 (31.1) 213 (64.9) Pregnancy status I/my partner is pregnant I/my partner has been pregnant I/my partner have never been pregnant 3 (0.9) 131 (39.9) 194 (59.1) Smoking status I smoke My partner smokes We both smoke I have smoked My partner smoked We both smoked No, I do not smoke No, we both do not smoke 40 (12.2) 24 (7.3) 22 (6.7) 36 (11.0) 18 (5.5) 26 (7.9) 65 (19.8) 97 (29.6) Stopped smoking during pregnancy Stopped during pregnancy Permanently stopped after pregnancy Did not completely stop during pregnancy Did not stop at all N=87 34 (39.1) 12 (13.8) 23 (26.4) 18 (20.7) 1 Education is categorized the following, low education (i.e. primary education, lower vocational education, intermediate general secondary education or not completed primary school), medium education (i.e. higher general secondary education or intermediate vocational education) and high education (i.e. university of higher vocational education). Phase 2: Composing a pilot study Based on the composed study design, the pilot study lasted ten to fourteen weeks per participant. We aimed to schedule the visits of the pregnant women every three weeks. However, the majority (n=6, 85.7%) cancelled their appointment frequently, which resulted in a different visiting schedule than the proposed study design. Phase 3: Execution Pilot study In total, nine pregnant women were included in the pilot study at three different locations. Five women were recruited at the university hospital (UMCG), two women at the general hospital (MZH), and two women at the primary midwifery practice (VSP). Table 2 illustrates the number of conducted interviews, dropouts, and negative and positive cotinine urine tests during the pilot study. Two women dropped out before conducting the interview at the first appointment, and six women dropped out before the end of the pilot study. One woman completed all test points and tested negative at the end of the pilot study, despite having a positive test at test point 3. Table 2. Numbers of included pregnant women, conducted interviews, dropouts, negative cotinine urine tests and positive cotinine urine tests during the pilot study. INCLUSION VISIT 1 VISIT 2 VISIT 3 VISIT 4 VISIT 5 TOTAL Interview Urine Test Urine Test Urine Test Urine Test Participating women (N) 9 7 6 3 2 1 NA 1 Women dropped out (N) 0 2 1 3 1 1 8 Negative Urine Test (N) NA NA 2 1 0 1 4 Positive Urine Test (N) NA NA 4 2 2 0 8 1 Not applicable. During the interviews at the start of the pilot study, it was found that all of the pregnant women were unemployed (n=7, 100.0%), all had attempted to stop smoking in the past (n=7, 100.0%), and most of them had health issues (n=6, 85.7%)(Table 3). The majority of the women started smoking at a young age, contributing to an average of 15 years of smoking, and the majority (n=5, 71.4%) also smoked inside their houses. Furthermore, the majority of women endured problems in their private situations, such as financial issues (n=5; 71.4%) or relational issues with partner or family (n=5; 71.4%). There were no distinctive differences between the case of the women who completed the pilot study and the women who dropped out. When asked for the motivation to participate in the pilot study, the majority was motivated to participate due to the unborn child’s health. Some women also mentioned that the pilot study acted as extra motivation. All of the women had attempted smoking cessation, of which only two women (n=2, 28.5%) were once successful in the past, and all repeatedly affirmed that it was difficult for them to stop smoking. Women saw addiction (n=4, 57.1%), stress (n=6, 85.7%) and routine (n=5, 71.4%) as the main obstacles to successfully quit smoking. To illustrate this, someone quoted, “ (…) when I faced difficult times during my life, I started smoking again (…)” (Table 4) . Other aspects that influenced their smoking cessation attempts were family or friends smoking in close proximity. Table 3. Characteristics of women at the start of the pilot study who participated in semi structured interviews (n=7). CHARACTERISTICS PREGNANT WOMEN N (%) Age (years) 20-25 26-30 31-35 36-40 3 (42.9) 1 (14.3) 2 (28.6) 1 (14.3) Pregnancy First Second Third 2 (28.6) 3 (42.9) 2 (28.6) Gestation (weeks) 8+0 – 10+6 11+0 – 13+6 14+0 – 16+6 17+0 – 19+6 20+0 – 22+6 23+0 – 25+6 2 (28.6) 2 (28.6) 1 (14.3) 0 (0.0) 1 (14.3) 1 (14.3) Employment Yes No 0 (0.0) 7 (100.0) Years of smoking 15 years 0 (0.0) 1 (14.3) 4 (57.1) 2 (28.6) Previous smoking cessation attempt Yes No 7 (100.0) 0 (0.0) Private problems Relational issues (with partner and/or family) Financial issues 5 (71.4) 5 (71.4) Health issues 1 Yes No 6 (85.7) 1 (14.3) 1 Health issues include Crohn’s disease, HELLP syndrome, preeclampsia, hereditary disorder, gestational diabetes, and peri-gestational haemorrhage. Table 4. Code tree of the conducted interviews with the pregnant women (n=7) including the themes, categories, subcategories, codes, quotes and anonymised participant IDs. CODE TREE - THEMES (CATEGORY) SUBCATEGORY CODE QUOTE PARTICIPANT ID 1 Smoking Positive influence on smoking cessation Activity Aid with smoking cessation Distraction Taking distance Eating Focus Hobby’s Household Avoidance Social Sport Approach External support Request for help Internal support Nicotine replacements Self “Usually I get up and then I know if I, when I get up and I have breakfast and do my things first, then um, I don’t have to smoke anymore” “... I've also decided not to go to friends for a while, this week anyway, so that I won't be tempted either.” “… well in the first week you just have to try to distract yourself that way ...” “... when I have the ultrasound, that you can hear the heartbeat that I will become more aware of oh yes I really have something in my belly …” “… hobby is photography, but uh, that's also paused at the moment. But I plan to do that again.” “Cleaning up, tidying up.” “Yes, especially with my boyfriend, when I, um, know that there is really nothing in the house. That there is nothing to look for ...” “Yes indeed, and my best friend also has 2 children, so you spend a lot of time together” “… pregnancy yoga first and I want to continue that later, …, you will fully relax yourself ...” “... without there being, um, a pointing finger ...” “… because you have to stop (…) not only my environment but eeh, also people in the hospital ...” “And now I wonder, maybe it would be like this (…) if I had perhaps had, then it might have been that I would have stopped longer” “... my friend gets angry if I smoke. But the rest of the environment is not so judgmental and angry.” “... I would like to use nicotine patches. But then if I do urine test you still have that, it still has, uh, nicotine in it.” “I'm really like eeh, yes I want it myself and I really support it so ehm, I can do that ...” U08 U08 U11 M02 U05 U04 U11 M02 U05 S12 U05 U04 U04 U04 U05 Negative influence on smoking cessation Counteractions Barrier Perseverance To deny Rushed Temptation “... after that there was no sympathy for the fact that I did smoke ... he reacted so angry that we got into a fight.” “... not motivated enough to ...” “And then you no longer assume things that can go wrong.” “... I'm already doing really well and then I'm going to seven milligrams, well and then I'm done with it and I overestimated myself in that.” “... then I was with friends again and then, yes, give me a cigarette too, yes then you start again.” U04 U04 U08 U04 U11 Reasons to smoke Reward Relaxation Smoking thoughts Routine Peace Stress Addiction Boredom Fancy “... because I no longer smoke weed, I still smoke, because it is so good that I did stop smoking weed. That's my reward.” “... now let's relax through ...” “And then it was really every day that I still thought, I have to, I have to, I have to, I have to.” “Yes, really dinner … I used to have, did I have in the morning that I thought now I'm going to have a cup of coffee and a cigarette ...” “When I smoke a cigarette, I calm down too.” “Then I ended up in a stressful situation again, so yes. Then you soon reach for a cigarette again.” “... because I have smoked now and then in between, you still have the taste for a bit ...” “... when you are home alone … I found it very difficult not to smoke because it was so quiet.” “... every now and then you just feel like a cigarette.” U04 U08 U04 U05 U05 U05 M02 U08 U05 Smoking behaviour Location Tobacco products Inside Outside E-cigarette Cigarette Weed “… usually in the kitchen with a window open, but not in the room.” “Not even on the balcony, … just go outside.” “... electric. I did that for a while.” “I actually smoke cigarettes.” “... before my pregnancy, um, I smoked weed too ….” U08 U05 U04 U08 U04 Smoking cessation Attempt to quit Consequences Fed up Easy Failed attempt Hard Period Regret Date of stopping Successful attempt Proud Used to Withdrawal symptoms Symptomatic aid “ It is, yes, just a shame …” “... it's okay (...) I actually stopped quite easily.” “... I did smoke a few times again, when I faced difficult times during my life, I started smoking again” “... it is very difficult for me to quit smoking.” “... I quit on my own for three months.” “Because then I have those side effects and now I also like well, I should have done this much sooner actually ...” “... I have something like (...) I'm going to start quitting today ...” “I pretty much stopped together with him, actually.” “... I am kind of proud but it doesn't feel um, I am not very proud. Because I (...) now also like, well, I should have done this much earlier actually ...” “... now that was really after three days that I really didn't have that anymore.” “Uh, yeah the first few days it was just that I was um, really cranky.” “Yes, I still got a prescription from the midwife, um, yes, the midwife gave me, um, something.” S01 U04 U05 U08 U05 U04 U05 M02 U04 U04 U04 U04 Pregnancy Pregnancy Uncomplicated pregnancy Preparations Pregnancy ailments “Yes, I am happy to have a new pregnancy. (…) But if I hear more and more things are going well, then, um, I am more relaxed myself.” “... well at home I'm still busy with the nursery of course and buying clothes and things like that, so I'm preparing well, yes.” “If something makes you nauseous all at once and then all at once, you've just eaten, well everything will come out again.” U08 U05 U08 Social Economic situation Financial Preliminary education Employment Unemployed “... because I have a benefit, after about two or three weeks (...) my money is normal, so low that I cannot, um, spend twenty euros on it because I still have 50 euros for groceries ...” “... lower vocational education, but I have been working since I was eighteen ...” “I just got back to work ,so I'm going to work for the first time today.” “... and now I stopped working again ...” U04 U05 U08 U08 Person Health Deceased child Personal “Yes and eeh, then I got eeh, Crohn's disease …, so I have to gradually rebuild everything a bit.” “... I also had a miscarriage before at 11 weeks ...” “And, well, I found those telephone contacts, um, that I found it really difficult to be open to others” U05 M02 U04 Research Test Negative test Positive test “... it is indeed negative ...” “... we had expected it a bit, unfortunately, …, but there was no second line to be seen and that actually means that there is still cotinine in the urine” U04 U08 Reason to stop smoking Purpose Child “... I just know there is, a creature living inside me, a daughter, … that stands up, really number one for me, so that's what I'm doing it for.” “... then you also realize it more, there is something in my belly . There's a creature in my belly.” U05 U05 Other Interest Aim Feedback “I think it is very important, after all I have been through ...” “I was already looking at second-hand but now I'm like oh, maybe I can get a new one.” “... that also feels good, I have also been in conversations that one is only talking and the other is just sitting around, so this is, I just like this.” U08 U04 U05 1 ID = Identity Documentation, generated by the first letter of the hospital recruiting the pregnant women and the number representing the month in which they were born. Phase 4: Evaluation of Pilot study All healthcare professionals (midwives, medical nurses, n=5) were enthusiastic about the financial-incentive-intervention pilot study, both prior to as after conducting the study. Some professionals were hesitant at first, as they thought the incentives were unfair to the non-smoking pregnant women. Despite this, they all acknowledged the importance of pregnant women to stop smoking and were pleased to convey this novel approach for smoking cessation in pregnant women. Aside from the positive feedback assembled during these contacts, a few suggestions were offered for possible future implication. The healthcare professionals in the hospitals commented that they think it would be more successful to include more pregnant women from midwifery practices instead of hospitals’ inclusion. They argued that many pregnant women in the hospital are more complex due to their medical situation as well as their social situation, possibly negatively influencing the pilot study. Additionally, the midwives stated that they have a large number of smoking pregnant women in their practice. The low inclusion number was, according to them, caused by a short period of inclusion and colleagues forgetting to mention the pilot study and not due to pregnant women not willing to participate in the pilot study. Additionally, all healthcare professionals mentioned that the pilot study’s execution was not troublesome, and they had no further suggestions about the practicality of execution in retrospect. Furthermore, pregnant women were also asked about their experiences with the pilot study, about financial incentives for smoking cessation for pregnant women in general and suggestions for future implications. Overall, the pregnant women assented that they were well informed about the study before they started. The appointments were experienced as pleasant, although some mentioned being ashamed about their smoking habits and found it hard to talk about it with healthcare professionals. All pregnant women thought of the financial-incentive-intervention as a helpful approach for pregnant women to stop smoking. Women also shared the perceptions of their partners about the financial incentives for smoking cessation and most of them (n=5) were positive about the intervention, since they acknowledged the importance of stopping smoking for their unborn child and wanted their partner to be able to abstain smoking during the pregnancy. It must be acknowledged that not all partners felt the same way about this and believed that the women should be able to stop without any help, as mentioned either by themselves when present or reported by the pregnant women about their partners. Along with the study, the researchers noticed that some pregnant women (n=4; 57.1%) desired additional support in the form of professional help. Therefore, they were provided with information about possible options such as support by telephone or therapy by another healthcare professional. Moreover, the qualitative data from the conducted interviews with the nine pregnant women found that the main factors essential for the successfulness of smoking cessation were the absence of stress, stable home situation and support from the environment, as shown in Table 4. Lastly, the prosperity and practicality of the pilot study were assessed. At the end of the pilot study, one out of nine pregnant women was able to abstain from smoking utilizing the financial-incentive-intervention. In total, 11 vouchers (7x €25,-; 2x €50,-; 1x €100; 1x €150,-) were given during the pilot study to different pregnant women, representing the financial-incentive-intervention practicality in clinical practice. Discussion This study was a feasibility study of implementing financial incentives to encourage pregnant women in the Northern Netherlands to quit smoking. During this study, it was found that it was possible to implement the pilot study at different healthcare institutions, and it appeared that participants, healthcare professionals and affiliated institutions wanted to collaborate. In the pilot study, factors negatively influencing smoking cessation were stress, home situation, and lack of support from their surroundings. In total, 55.1% of the Dutch population sample, who completed the online survey, indicated that a financial incentive was inappropriate for smoking cessation in pregnant women. However, it must be mentioned that this population sample may not perfectly represent the Dutch population, since the majority of the respondents were women (n=266, 81.1%). Moreover, the distribution of the questionnaire might have caused biased inclusions due to distribution via personal Facebook sites of students of Medical Sciences, resulting in the recruitment of their acquaintances as well as unknowns. This opinion is nevertheless similar to other published research in which the utilization of financial incentives in healthcare was seen as unfair compared to standard interventions and depended on the extent to which the target group was seen as responsible for their smoking behaviour [12, 17]. In addition, it was also seen that respondents with a younger age, women, smokers who tried to quit, and respondents with a higher education answered significantly more positively to the ten statements, of which only age was found to be significant in our study [12]. However, other studies with pregnant women who smoke and the use of incentives as motivation to quit have indicated that this is a successful intervention [10,11,18-20]. One study found that smoking pregnant women mainly had smoking cessation problems due to environmental barriers, mainly from family smoking status, which was also found in our study [21]. This study had several limitations. Firstly, the limited respondent group did not correctly represent the population in our study’s several phases. The pilot study participants were mainly unemployed pregnant women with low SES, which could indicate that this population benefits the most from the financial-incentive-intervention. Although low SES was represented during the pilot study, this population was not appropriately represented in the online questionnaire, which was mainly answered by respondents with a high SES [23]. The limited group size also applies to the pilot study participants, which was estimated higher prior to the study. The limitations may have led to inclusion bias, in which only pregnant women of lower socioeconomic class wanted to participate. Inclusion bias might also have occurred in the questionnaire, in which the most outspoken respondents may have taken part. Furthermore, due to the small sample size, no statement could yet be made about the prosperity of implementing the financial-incentive-intervention in clinical practice. Moreover, it is hard to conclude about the prosperousness of the sample size in future studies, since the total number of approached and eligible women were not collected during this study. It is therefore not known how many eligible participants have been missed. Secondly, this study has a high dropout rate as only one participant completed the study. There were no distinctive differences established that could explain the successfulness of this participant compared to the dropouts. The majority of the participants who dropped out (n=8, 62.5%) did not show up to or cancelled the scheduled appointments. During the pilot study, it appeared that as a result of the cancellations and the consecutively rescheduling, the duration between the different appointments was more than the desired three weeks, occasionally resulting in noncompliance with the study design. It often turned out to be rather challenging to contact the concerned participants, resulting in no follow-up appointments. A review by Dantas et al. on contributing factors to missing appointments found that the use of tobacco and young patients with low socioeconomic status living far away from the clinic are important contributing factors [24]. According to the authors, it is advisable to plan as many appointments as possible in advance for participants where the risk is high. Although this has also been tried as much as possible in this study, it may be useful to pay more attention to this in a follow-up study. In addition, several participants mentioned they stopped because missing the last reimbursement due to a positive cotinine urine test took away the motivation, and the study was experienced as stressful. The stress of the study was in addition to the stress that many participants experienced because of their private situation and the medical complications during their pregnancy. This exposure to stress raises questions about whether it might be better to give a fixed amount for each appointment instead of an incremental amount, whether the interval between amounts should be reduced, or whether more appointments should be scheduled. Moreover, it should be considered to offer the pregnant women standardised additional support in the form of professional help, such as telephone support or specialized addiction care support, to be incorporated in the study design of the financial-incentive-intervention. [13,25] Conclusion In conclusion, this study offered promising opportunities for smoking cessation in pregnant women to reduce the consecutive harmful impact on the health of both the pregnant women and their unborn child. Acceptability is a critical point for further continuation of this study, both from the population, where there was an adverse reaction to rewarding the participants, as from the pregnant women, where little was either achieved with smoking cessation during this study. Notwithstanding, it can be said that practicality and implementation have been met on various points of feasibility. In defiance of the limited study population this study demonstrated the proof of concept of the financial-incentive-intervention to be feasible for implementation. A follow-up study needs to be performed to confirm this pilot’s study feasibility and prove the effectiveness of the financial-incentive-intervention in a larger study population, which could be achieved by tackling the aforementioned limitations. It would then be important to recruit more pregnant women at primary-care midwifery practises, so pregnant women with and without medical concerns are equally represented in the study population. Furthermore, standardised additional professional help should be incorporated in the study design to provide additional support in smoking cessation, reduce the exposure to stress, and possibly prevent the high number of dropouts. Dropouts should further be limited by scheduling more appointments in advance to avoid high number of no-shows. If future studies would then prove the effectiveness of the intervention to reduce the number of smoking accordingly reduce the high prevalence of pregnant women smoking in Dutch areas with lower socioeconomic status and diminish the consecutively harmful exposure to tobacco to both mother and child. Abbreviations SES Socioeconomic status UMCG University Medical Centre Groningen MZH Martini Hospital Groningen VSP Verloskundige Stadspraktijk Groningen Declarations Ethics approval and consent to participate The study protocol was approved by the Medical Ethics Research Committee of the UMCG (nr 201800826) and were performed in accordance with the applicable guidelines and regulations. Informed consent was given by each participant incorporated in the study. Consent for publication Not applicable. Availability of data and materials All data generated or analysed during this study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request. Competing interests The authors declare that they have no competing interests. Funding The authors received funding from ZonMW for the project “Together we’ll quit smoking!” (531003018). Additional funding was obtained from the Department of Obstetrics (UMCG) and Noord Negentig for the conduction of the pilot study, more specifically for the purchase of the utilised vouchers. Author’s contributions TK, AR, MH, LH, and LK equally contributed to the conception, execution of the designed study, and the analysis of the feasibility study concerning financial incentives for smoking cessation in pregnant women. JE was the main supervisor during the conception, execution and analysis of the feasibility study, and was a major contributor in rewriting the manuscript. TK drafted the original manuscript and created the final tables and figures. LP contributed with the design of the feasibility study, and was the main supervisor for the reviewing and editing of the manuscript. All authors read, commented and approved the submitted version of the manuscript. Acknowledgements We would like to thank all Dutch respondents to the online questionnaire and pregnant women participating in the pilot study for their contribution to our study. Additionally, we would like to show our gratitude to all the healthcare professionals and affiliated institutions collaborating in this study. References Cnattingius S. The epidemiology of smoking during pregnancy: Smoking prevalence, maternal characteristics, and pregnancy outcomes. Nicotine and Tobacco Research. 2004 Apr; 6: Suppl2 :S125-40. Andres RL, Day MC. Perinatal complications associated with maternal tobacco use. Semin Neonatal. 2000 Aug; 5(3):231-41. Thacher JD, Gehring U, Gruzieva O, Standi M, Pershagen G, Bauer CP, et al. Maternal smoking during pregnancy and early childhood and development of asthma and rhinoconjunctivitis – a MeDALL project. Environ Health Perspect. 2018 Apr 12; 126(4):047005. Croes E, de Josselin de Jong S. Roken en Zwangerschap [Internet]. Trimbos-Instituut. 2014 [cited 2020 Jun 12]. Available from: https://www.trimbos.nl/docs/625c3ca9-3d55-4c4c-87b3-3318e3fcec95.pdf. Addendum Werkgroep. Addendum Behandeling van tabaksverslaving en stoppen-met-roken ondersteuning bij zwangere vrouwen [Internet]. Trimbos-Instituut. 2017 [cited 2020 Jul 4]. Available from: https://www.trimbos.nl/docs/8dcff786-e1b2-4556-8220-7ca285531b6c.pdf. Sociaal Centraal Planbureau. Sociaaleconomische status 2017 [Internet]. Rijksinstituut voor Volksgezondheid en Milieu. 2017 [cited 2020 Jun 18]. Available from: https://www.volksgezondheidenzorg.info/onderwerp/sociaaleconomische-status/regionaal-internationaal/regionaal#node-sociaaleconomische-status. De Wolff MG, Backhausen MG, Iversen ML, Bendix JM, Rom AL, Hegaard HK. Prevalence and predictors of maternal smoking prior to and during pregnancy in a regional Danish population: A cross-sectional study. Reprod Health. 2019 Jun 14; 16(1):82. Mohsin M, Bauman AE. Socio-demographic factors associated with smoking and smoking cessation among 426,344 pregnant women in New South Wales, Australia. BMC Public Health. 2005 Dec 21; 5(1):138. Scheffers-van Schayck T, den Hollander W, van Belzen E, Monshouwer K, Tuithof M. Monitor Middelengebruik en Zwangerschap 2018 [Internet]. Trimbos-Instituut. 2019 [cited 2020 Jun 12]. Available from: https://www.trimbos.nl/docs/a11ec803-9674-43dd-a624-eff8a4b3ad8f.pdf. Broer J. Roken moeder tijdens zwangerschap 2015-2018. GGD Groningen, Rapp Jeugdgezondheidsz 2019. 2019. GGD Groningen. Percentage zwangeren dat rookt – Gemeenten (2019) [Internet]. GGD Groningen. 2019. Available from: https://ggdgroningen.incijfers.nl/jive?workspace_guid=29270ad7-4b84-4971-940a-353854a7c907. Cahill K, Hartmann-Boyce J, Perera R. Incentives for smoking cessation. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2015; 18(5):4307. Tappin D, Bauld L, Purves D, Boyd K, Sinclair L, MacAskill S, et al. Financial incentives for smoking cessation in pregnacy: Randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2015 Jan 27; 350. Berlin N, Goldzahl L, Bauld L, Hoddinott P, Berlin I. Public acceptability of financial incentives to reward pregnant smokers who quit smoking: a United-Kingdom-France comparison. Eur J Heal Econ. 2018 Jun 1; 19(5):697-708. Wen X, Higgins ST, Xie C, Epstein LH. Improving Public Acceptability of Using Financial Incentives for Smoking Cessation During Pregnancy: A Randomized Controlled Experiment. Nicotine Tob Res. 2016 May 1; 18(5):913-8. Bowen DJ, Kreuter M, Spring B, Cofta-Woerpel L, Linnan L, Weiner D, et al. How We Design Feasibility Studies. Am J Prev Med. 2009 May; 36(5):452-457. B.V. N von Minden. Drug-screen COT 200 test 1x50 teststrips [Internet]. Available from: https://www.nal-vonminden.com/nl/drug-screen-cot-200-test-1x50-teststrips.html. Hall ES, Wexelblatt SL, Greenberg JM. Self-reported and laboratory evaluation of late pregnancy nicotine exposure and drugs of abuse. J Perinatol. 2016 Oct 1; 36(10):814-8. Achilihu H, Feng J, Wang L, Bernert JT. Tobacco Use Classification by Inexpensive Urinary Cotinine Immunoassay Test Strips. J Anal Toxicol. 2019 Mar 1; 43(2):149-53. Wickstrom R. Effects of Nicotine During Pregnancy: Human and Experimental Evidence. Curr Neuropharmacol. 2007 Aug 30; 5(3):213-22. Coleman T, Britton J, Thornton J. Nicotine replacement therapy in pregnancy. BMJ. 2004 Apr 24; 328(7446):965-6. Erlingsson C, Brysiewicz P. A hands-on guide to doing content analysis. Afr J Emerg Med. 2017 Sep; 7(3):93-9. Feijen-de Jong EI, van der Pijl M, Vedam S, Jansen DEMC, Peters LL. Measuring respect and autonomy in Dutch maternity care: Applicability of two measures. Women and Birth. 2020 Sep 1; 33(5):e447-54. Dantas LF, Fleck JL, Cyrino Oliveira FL, Hamacher S. No-shows in appointment scheduling – a systematic literature review. Health Policy. 2018 Apr; 122(4):412-421. Weiland S, Warmelink JC, Peters LL, Berger MY, Erwich JJHM, Jansen DEMC. The needs of women and their partners regarding professional smoking cessation support during pregnancy: A qualitative study. Women Birth. 2021 Mar; S1871-5192(21)00046-9. Additional Declarations No competing interests reported. Supplementary Files Additionalfile1Revisionsmokingcessationinpregnantwomenusingfinancialincentivesafeasibilitystudy.docx Cite Share Download PDF Status: Under Review Version 1 posted Editorial decision: Major revision 06 Sep, 2022 Reviews received at journal 04 Aug, 2022 Reviewers agreed at journal 28 Jul, 2022 Reviewers agreed at journal 02 Jun, 2022 Reviewers invited by journal 31 May, 2022 Editor assigned by journal 26 May, 2022 Editor invited by journal 23 May, 2022 Submission checks completed at journal 23 May, 2022 First submitted to journal 13 May, 2022 You are reading this latest preprint version Research Square lets you share your work early, gain feedback from the community, and start making changes to your manuscript prior to peer review in a journal. As a division of Research Square Company, we’re committed to making research communication faster, fairer, and more useful. We do this by developing innovative software and high quality services for the global research community. Our growing team is made up of researchers and industry professionals working together to solve the most critical problems facing scientific publishing. Also discoverable on Platform About Our Team In Review Editorial Policies Advisory Board Help Center Resources Author Services Accessibility API Access RSS feed Manage Cookie Preferences © Research Square 2026 | ISSN 2693-5015 (online) Privacy Policy Terms of Service Do Not Sell My Personal Information {"props":{"pageProps":{"initialData":{"identity":"rs-1652235","acceptedTermsAndConditions":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"archivedVersions":[],"articleType":"Research Article","associatedPublications":[],"authors":[{"id":107956303,"identity":"84f20758-ec1a-4da8-871c-5700ca9bea44","order_by":0,"name":"T. A. Kroder","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"University of Groningen","correspondingAuthor":false,"submittingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"T.","middleName":"A.","lastName":"Kroder","suffix":""},{"id":107956305,"identity":"1baa0203-f090-4801-87bd-d09471a67684","order_by":1,"name":"L. L. Peters","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"University of Groningen","correspondingAuthor":false,"submittingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"L.","middleName":"L.","lastName":"Peters","suffix":""},{"id":107956307,"identity":"4d62b03a-35fd-4ff8-a82b-d28299af5afb","order_by":2,"name":"A. Roggeveld","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"University of Groningen","correspondingAuthor":false,"submittingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"A.","middleName":"","lastName":"Roggeveld","suffix":""},{"id":107956308,"identity":"c75ce86f-29f9-4e27-9b80-a4334afc77ee","order_by":3,"name":"M. Holtrop","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"University of Groningen","correspondingAuthor":false,"submittingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"M.","middleName":"","lastName":"Holtrop","suffix":""},{"id":107956309,"identity":"653aeec0-0d9e-4054-b627-a9dc2b9699ac","order_by":4,"name":"L. Harshagen","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"University of Groningen","correspondingAuthor":false,"submittingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"L.","middleName":"","lastName":"Harshagen","suffix":""},{"id":107956310,"identity":"20703c1b-6ccc-4b68-a949-7e81b03e1957","order_by":5,"name":"L. M. Klein","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"University of Groningen","correspondingAuthor":false,"submittingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"L.","middleName":"M.","lastName":"Klein","suffix":""},{"id":107956311,"identity":"2fd7c182-9f85-4de6-9ab2-6988c73dce12","order_by":6,"name":"J. J.H.M. Erwich","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"University of Groningen","correspondingAuthor":true,"submittingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"J.","middleName":"J.H.M.","lastName":"Erwich","suffix":""}],"badges":[],"createdAt":"2022-05-13 08:14:12","currentVersionCode":1,"declarations":"","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-1652235/v1","doiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-1652235/v1","draftVersion":[],"editorialEvents":[],"editorialNote":"","failedWorkflow":false,"files":[{"id":21880078,"identity":"46bb4104-23f7-4247-9acf-41c8beaacbbb","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2022-05-25 16:32:22","extension":"png","order_by":1,"title":"Figure 1","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":124955,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eStudy design for the pilot study. Illustrating the time points of the interview and cotinine urine tests plus the amount of money the participants could receive at each time point. The green cotinine urine tests represent negative tests indicating no exposure to smoking. The figure\u003cstrong\u003e \u003c/strong\u003eillustrates the amount of money the vouchers would represent if a participant would be present at the interview and consecutively would have four negative cotinine urine tests indicating she had stopped smoking. In case a participant would have a positive cotinine urine test in week 7, this would result in no voucher at that appointment and consequently a final voucher of €150 euros in week 10 if the cotinine urine test would then again be negative. \u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"Fig01.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-1652235/v1/0a7ecaedcf4733aa48719333.png"},{"id":21880079,"identity":"dec9fe1f-9f27-4146-ab2d-89c21a3ec954","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2022-05-25 16:32:23","extension":"png","order_by":2,"title":"Figure 2","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":30074,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eFlowchart inclusion of responses to the online questionnaire.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"Onlinefloatimage2.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-1652235/v1/dcb64f1af04ca5ec645d3a04.png"},{"id":21880081,"identity":"a803092f-bd64-4ab0-a9a4-a83684215f1e","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2022-05-25 16:32:27","extension":"pdf","order_by":0,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"manuscript-pdf","size":558513,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"manuscript.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-1652235/v1/362c0463-f226-49e4-869f-27a0ed747f8d.pdf"},{"id":21880080,"identity":"de6f7907-2968-4488-b9ea-b48e9ab8e1e2","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2022-05-25 16:32:23","extension":"docx","order_by":0,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"supplement","size":15874,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"Additionalfile1Revisionsmokingcessationinpregnantwomenusingfinancialincentivesafeasibilitystudy.docx","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-1652235/v1/44e7bf3ac2543cc6c6d4f151.docx"}],"financialInterests":"No competing interests reported.","formattedTitle":"Smoking cessation in pregnant women using financial incentives: a feasibility study.","fulltext":[{"header":"Background","content":"\u003cp\u003eExposure to tobacco during pregnancy is harmful to both mother and child. Smoking during pregnancy increases the risk of short- and long term complications, such as miscarriage, pre-term birth, and the development of lung diseases like asthma in the child\u0026rsquo;s later life\u0026nbsp;[1\u0026ndash;3].\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIn the Netherlands, several smoking cessation interventions support pregnant women to stop smoking and preventing them from relapsing after their pregnancies. In the Trimbos Guideline Smoking cessation counselling, these interventions can be provided by several healthcare professionals and are divided into psychosocial interventions (e.g. personal counselling, either face-to-face or by telephone) and pharmacological interventions (e.g. nicotine replacements)\u0026nbsp;[4,5]. Although the overall percentage of pregnant women smoking in the Netherlands has decreased in the last couple of years, the prevalence remains higher in areas with lower socioeconomic status (SES), like the three Northern provinces (Groningen, Friesland, and Drenthe)\u0026nbsp;[6\u0026ndash;8].\u003cstrong\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003eThe province of Groningen, for example, showed varying percentages per municipality from 5.5 to 19.8% in 2019, while the overall percentage of pregnant women who smoked at any point during their pregnancy in the Netherlands was 7.4% in 2018\u0026nbsp;[9\u0026ndash;11]. These high percentages demonstrate a high need for a novel and innovative method that is more effective among these groups. A promising method is giving financial incentives for the smoking cessation of pregnant women. Studies conducted in the United States and the United-Kingdom reported that this method stimulates women to quit smoking and decreases the overall percentage of women smoking during and after pregnancy\u0026nbsp;[12,13].\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eA study conducted in the United-Kingdom showed that women who received financial incentives were more likely to quit smoking during (22.5% vs 8.6%) and after (15.0% vs 4.0%) their pregnancy compared to women who received standard intervention methods (OR 2.63; 95% CI 1.73-4.01)\u0026nbsp;[13]. The women participating in this study received incentives with a maximum of 400 pounds (converted being approximately \u0026euro;467) per participant, and the study used carbon monoxide breath tests and cotinine saliva assays to confirm the participants\u0026rsquo; non-smoking status. A meta-analysis demonstrated that contingent incentives also have a higher motivating effect and resulted in a larger group of participants who stopped smoking compared to non-contingent incentives (21.4% vs 5.9%, respectively)\u0026nbsp;[12].\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eNotwithstanding the positive outcomes of using financial incentives, it seems that other factors that could potentially influence the results of such an intervention should be investigated before implementing it. One factor that could negatively influence the intervention\u0026rsquo;s execution is the public acceptability in the society where the intervention will be implemented. Other studies have reported the importance of investigating public acceptability in order to implement such an intervention successfully in clinical practice [14,15]. To our knowledge, no other study has investigated the public acceptability of the Dutch population about financial incentives for smoking cessation in pregnant women.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eConcluding, this study aimed to investigate the feasibility of implementing contingent incentives as smoking cessation support in the Northern Netherlands. The project contained four developmental phases to ensure optimal implementation of the financial-incentive-intervention in clinical practice. Firstly, the Dutch population\u0026rsquo;s public acceptability for financial incentives was assessed by conducting an online questionnaire. Secondly, this study attempted to develop a financial-incentive-intervention that stimulates pregnant women to quit smoking and thirdly executed the implementation in clinical practice. Fourthly, the financial-incentive-intervention was evaluated after implementation in clinical practice, and this included both the perspectives of healthcare professionals and participants themselves. \u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Methods","content":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eFeasibility study\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe theory of Bowen et al. (2009) was used to assess the feasibility of this implementation study of contingent incentives for smoking cessation support [16]. This theory consists of four developmental phases; acceptability, composing, implementation and evaluation of the feasibility in clinical practice. The first phase comprised exploration of the Dutch population\u0026rsquo;s perspectives regarding the financial-incentive-intervention by conducting an online questionnaire. These results provided input for the consecutive second phase, in which a study design was composed for a pilot study, including the financial-incentive-intervention. The third phase comprised the execution of this pilot study, followed by the fourth phase, which incorporated an evaluation of the pilot study in clinical practice, utilising both healthcare professionals and pregnant women\u0026rsquo;s perspectives.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003ePhase 1: Acceptability\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eWith an online questionnaire, the public acceptability of the Dutch population for the financial-incentive-intervention was assessed. The online questionnaire comprised 23 items regarding the opinion of the financial-incentive-intervention and its actual implementation. The online questionnaire was developed via Qualtrics, and the anonymous link was distributed amongst the Dutch community through 5 personal Facebook sites of students of Medical Sciences to 59 of their acquaintances or unknowns. Facebook was chosen as medium, since it is fairly easy to recruit via this way and it can be used to create a large reach in the Netherlands among different population groups.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe questionnaire comprised of eight sociodemographic questions (e.g. gender, education, and smoking status), ten statements concerning smoking cessation support for pregnant women (e.g. \u0026ldquo;Pregnant women may receive financial incentives if they stop smoking during their pregnancy\u0026rdquo;) and five questions concerning the design of a financial-incentive intervention (e.g. \u0026ldquo;In what form should the financial incentive be given?\u0026rdquo;). The ten statements could be scored according to a 5-Likert scale, ranging from \u0026ldquo;strongly agree\u0026rdquo; to \u0026ldquo;strongly disagree\u0026rdquo; (see Additional file 1). \u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe online questionnaire results were analysed by using descriptive statistics. Statistical differences between different sociodemographic groups (gender, age, education, smoking status, and (former) pregnant women and their partners) were calculated by Student T-tests, ANOVAs, Mann-Whitney U and Kruskal-Wallis tests, where appropriate. The data were analysed utilising SPSS Statistics version 23.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003ePhase 2: Composing a Pilot study\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eBased on a similar study by Cahill et al. (2015) on incentives for smoking cessation, the financial incentives were offered in vouchers that could be spent in a widely known baby store in multiple cities spread across the Netherlands [12]. The financial incentives would be provided to the recruited pregnant women during five scheduled appointments if the measured amount of cotinine proved smoking abstinence in the urine of the pregnant women by means of a urine dipstick test (Drug test Drug-Detect Nicotine (Cotinine), 200 nanogram/mL) [17]. Studies described cotinine urine dipstick tests as a valid means of detecting smoking cessation in participants [18,19]. Furthermore, these studies showed that cotinine in the urine could still be detected for two to four days after smoking, enabling more reliable detection of the smoking status of the included pregnant women in our study.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe pilot study\u0026rsquo;s financial scheme was based on the results of Phase 1 and a published review by Cahill et al. [12]. A \u0026euro;25 voucher could be obtained during the first study appointment, which included a cotinine urine test plus a semi-structured interview to gain more information about the participants\u0026rsquo; sociodemographic characteristics and factors that could influence smoking cessation, such as home situation and social support. The four consecutive appointments primarily encompassed cotinine urine tests, for which \u0026euro;50/\u0026euro;100/\u0026euro;150/\u0026euro;250 vouchers could be obtained respectively, bringing the total amount to be received in vouchers up to \u0026euro;575,-. The vouchers were given according to a contingent financial scheme, meaning the amount of money increased each time a pregnant woman tested negative for the cotinine urine test, as shown in Figure 1. The voucher could not be obtained if the pregnant woman tested positive, implicating the total amount of money could not be reached anymore by this woman. The study appointments were scheduled with two researchers at the University Medical Center Groningen (UMCG), and were preferably combined with their usual care appointments. The appointments were aimed to be scheduled every three weeks, consecutive leading to the pilot study lasting approximately ten to fourteen weeks per participant.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003ePhase 3: Execution Pilot study\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe pilot study implemented the financial-incentive-intervention in clinical practice. The smoking pregnant women were recruited in the city of Groningen at three locations, a universal hospital (University Medical Centre Groningen; UMCG), a general hospital (Martini Hospital Groningen; MZH), and a primary-care midwifery practice (Verloskundige Stadspraktijk Groningen; VSP). The women were recruited in the period March-May 2019.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eHealthcare professionals (midwives, medical nurses, n=9), who were employed at the abovementioned locations, identified eligible smoking pregnant women at their first appointment and informed them about the pilot study. In case of the women\u0026rsquo;s eligibility and interest, the researchers contacted them to give further information and recruit them afterwards. Informed consent was given by each participant. \u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eWomen were included if they were older than 17 years of age, gestational age \u0026lt; 30 weeks, self-reported smoking at the time of the first appointment, and were motivated to quit smoking. Pregnant women utilising nicotine replacements were excluded, as previous studies stated that this form of nicotine could be harmful during pregnancy [20,21].\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe study protocol was approved by the Medical Ethics Research Committee of the UMCG (nr 201800826). The study \u0026nbsp;was conducted in accordance with Good Clinical Practice guidelines and regulations.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003ePhase 4: Evaluation of Pilot study\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe pilot study was evaluated using a mixed-methods approach. Firstly, five healthcare professionals were asked in contact about their experiences with the financial-incentive-intervention pilot study and their suggestions for future implication of the financial-incentive-intervention. Particularly, healthcare professionals perspectives on the feasibility of the pilot study were collected.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eNext, a standardised questionnaire was utilised to obtain data about the included pregnant women\u0026rsquo;s pilot study experiences. During the participant\u0026rsquo;s last study appointment, the pregnant women were invited for their last cotinine urine test and asked to complete a standardised questionnaire. This questionnaire contained items about experiences during the pilot study\u0026rsquo;s inclusion and consecutive execution, their opinion about financial incentives for smoking cessation for pregnant women, and their suggestions for future studies.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eMoreover, all included women were asked to participate in a semi-structured interview at the first study appointment. During the interviews women\u0026rsquo;s individual experiences with smoking cessation interventions were discussed even as their smoking behaviour, pregnancy and social status. Also the support and perceptions of their partners regarding smoking cessation interventions were discussed, if applicable. The interviews were digitally recorded and transcribed verbatim and analysed utilising ATLAS.ti (ATLAS.ti Scientific Software Development GmbH. ATLAS.ti for Windows, version 5.2.18) [22].\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eFurthermore, the prosperity of implementing the financial-incentive-intervention in clinical practice was assessed at the end of the pilot study by affirming the number of pregnant women able to abstain from smoking during the pilot study. Lastly, an evaluation of the pilot study\u0026rsquo;s practicality was performed by looking in retrospect at the number of women using the financial-incentive-intervention in clinical practice.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Results","content":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003ePhase 1: Acceptability\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIn total, 409 individuals responded to the online questionnaire. Figure 2 shows a total of 328 responses were included in the analyses to assess the Dutch population\u0026rsquo;s acceptability of financial incentives for smoking cessation in pregnant women. In total 81 responses were excluded from the analysis due to duplications (n=2), missing values on all items (n=36) or not answering all of the ten statements concerning smoking cessation support for pregnant women (n=43).\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eTable 1 shows the respondent\u0026rsquo;s characteristics. The majority of the respondents were female (n=266, 81.1%) and between 20-29 years (n=133, 40.5%). Most of the respondents had high education (n=213, 64.9%) and had never been pregnant (n=194, 59.1%). Furthermore, approximately half of the respondents or their partners were smoking (n=86, 26.2%) or had smoked in the past (n=80, 24.4%).\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe sequent part of the questionnaire comprised ten statements concerning smoking cessation support for pregnant women. The results showed large disunity among the respondents. Respondents indicated that they consider financial incentives a controversial intervention and are both positive and negative towards various aspects of the implementation of the financial-incentive-intervention. The importance of smoking cessation for pregnant women was affirmed by the vast majority of the respondents (n=298, 90.9%). Furthermore, the majority of the respondents considered it feasible for pregnant women to quit smoking, both during and after the pregnancy (respectively n=268, 82.0%, and n=238, 72.8%). In total, 170 (51.8%) of the respondents indicated that they totally disagreed to disagreed with the statement for rewarding pregnant women with financial incentives if they quit smoking during their pregnancy. Additionally, half of the respondents (totally) disagreed with the possible implementation of the financial-incentive-intervention (n=178, 54.3%), and a quarter (n=80, 24.4%) of the respondents (totally) agreed with this statement.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe last five questions of the questionnaire concerned the design of the financial-incentive-intervention. The results showed that 55.1% of the respondents (n=179) thought it was inappropriate to give a financial incentive for smoking cessation, compared to 31.7% of the respondents (n=103) who did think it was an appropriate intervention and 13.2% (n=43) of the respondents who were not sure whether it was appropriate or inappropriate. Approximately one third (n=103, 31.4%) of the respondents thought it was feasible for the women to stop smoking using the financial-incentive-intervention, while one third (n=108, 33.0%) thought it was not feasible, and one third (n=117, 35.6%) did not know whether it was feasible. Furthermore, the respondents were asked who should help pregnant women stop smoking. The most chosen option was an addiction medicine physician (n=114, 37.9%), followed by a general practitioner (n=54, 17.9%), a midwife (n=45, 15.0%), a general practice-based nursing specialist (n=42, 14.0%), a gynaecologist (n=13, 4.3%), a combination of healthcare professionals and family or partner, (n=12, 4.0%) and the pregnant woman herself (n=9, 3.0%).\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIn case the financial-incentive-intervention would be implemented, most respondents felt the amount of money should be between \u0026euro;0-\u0026euro;100 (n=32, 31.1%), between \u0026euro;100-\u0026euro;200 (n=33, 32.0%) or between \u0026euro;200-300 (n=16, 15.3%). Furthermore, it was believed by a large group of respondents that the financial incentives could best be given in the form of vouchers (n=120, 38.6%). Around half of the respondents (n=158, 49.8%) believed it would then be best to give the complete reimbursement at the end of the pilot study, while 37.5% (n=119) believed the reimbursement should be incremental amounts during the pilot study and 12.6% (n=40) believed the reimbursement should be distributed equally during the pilot study.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eTable\u0026nbsp;1. Sociodemographic characteristics of respondent\u0026rsquo;s participating in online questionnaire (Phase 1)(n=328).\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ctable border=\"0\" cellpadding=\"0\" cellspacing=\"0\" width=\"0\"\u003e\n \u003ctbody\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"75.04132231404958%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eRESPONDENTS CHARACTERISTICS\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"24.958677685950413%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eTotal population\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eN=328, 100%\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eN (%)\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"75.04132231404958%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eGender\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eMale\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eFemale\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"24.958677685950413%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e62 (18.9)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e266 (81.1)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"75.04132231404958%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eAge (years)\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026lt; 20\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e20-29\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e30-39\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e40-49\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e50-59\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026ge; 60\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"24.958677685950413%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e22 (6.7)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e133 (40.5)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e52 (15.9)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e66 (20.1)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e36 (11.0)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e19 (5.8)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"75.04132231404958%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eEducation\u003csup\u003e1\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eLow\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eMedium\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eHigh\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"24.958677685950413%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e13 (4.0)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e102 (31.1)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e213 (64.9)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"75.04132231404958%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003ePregnancy status\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eI/my partner is pregnant\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eI/my partner has been pregnant\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eI/my partner have never been pregnant\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"24.958677685950413%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e3 (0.9)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e131 (39.9)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e194 (59.1)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"75.04132231404958%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eSmoking status\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eI smoke\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eMy partner smokes\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eWe both smoke\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eI have smoked\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eMy partner smoked\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eWe both smoked\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eNo, I do not smoke\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eNo, we both do not smoke\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"24.958677685950413%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e40 (12.2)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e24 (7.3)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e22 (6.7)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e36 (11.0)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e18 (5.5)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e26 (7.9)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e65 (19.8)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e97 (29.6)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"75.04132231404958%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eStopped smoking during pregnancy\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eStopped during pregnancy\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003ePermanently stopped after pregnancy\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eDid not completely stop during pregnancy\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eDid not stop at all\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"24.958677685950413%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eN=87\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e34 (39.1)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e12 (13.8)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e23 (26.4)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e18 (20.7)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003c/tbody\u003e\n\u003c/table\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003csup\u003e1\u003c/sup\u003e Education is categorized the following, low education (i.e. primary education, lower vocational education, intermediate general secondary education or not completed primary school), medium education (i.e. higher general secondary education or intermediate vocational education) and high education (i.e. university of higher vocational education).\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003ePhase 2: Composing a pilot study\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eBased on the composed study design, the pilot study lasted ten to fourteen weeks per participant. We aimed to schedule the visits of the pregnant women every three weeks. However, the majority (n=6, 85.7%) cancelled their appointment frequently, which resulted in a different visiting schedule than the proposed study design.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003ePhase 3: Execution Pilot study\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIn total, nine pregnant women were included in the pilot study at three different locations. Five women were recruited at the university hospital (UMCG), two women at the general hospital (MZH), and two women at the primary midwifery practice (VSP). Table 2 illustrates the number of conducted interviews, dropouts, and negative and positive cotinine urine tests during the pilot study. Two women dropped out before conducting the interview at the first appointment, and six women dropped out before the end of the pilot study. One woman completed all test points and tested negative at the end of the pilot study, despite having a positive test at test point 3.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eTable 2. Numbers of included pregnant women, conducted interviews, dropouts, negative cotinine urine tests and positive cotinine urine tests during the pilot study. \u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ctable border=\"0\" cellpadding=\"0\" cellspacing=\"0\" width=\"0\"\u003e\n \u003ctbody\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"21.52317880794702%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"11.258278145695364%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eINCLUSION\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"10.264900662251655%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u0026nbsp;VISIT 1\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"10.76158940397351%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eVISIT 2\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"10.76158940397351%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eVISIT 3\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"10.76158940397351%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eVISIT 4\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"15.397350993377483%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eVISIT 5\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"9.271523178807946%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eTOTAL\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"21.52317880794702%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"11.258278145695364%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"10.264900662251655%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;Interview \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"10.76158940397351%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;Urine Test \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"10.76158940397351%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;Urine Test\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"10.76158940397351%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;Urine Test\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"15.397350993377483%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;Urine Test\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"9.271523178807946%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"21.52317880794702%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eParticipating women (N)\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"11.258278145695364%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;9\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"10.264900662251655%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;7 \u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"10.76158940397351%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;6 \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"10.76158940397351%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;3 \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"10.76158940397351%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;2 \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"15.397350993377483%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;1 \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"9.271523178807946%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;NA\u003csup\u003e1\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"21.52317880794702%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u0026nbsp;Women dropped out \u0026nbsp;(N)\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"11.258278145695364%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;0\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"10.264900662251655%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;2\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"10.76158940397351%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;1 \u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"10.76158940397351%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;3 \u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"10.76158940397351%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;1 \u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"15.397350993377483%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;1 \u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"9.271523178807946%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;8 \u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"21.52317880794702%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u0026nbsp;Negative Urine Test (N)\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"11.258278145695364%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;NA\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"10.264900662251655%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;NA\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"10.76158940397351%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;2 \u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"10.76158940397351%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;1 \u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"10.76158940397351%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;0 \u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"15.397350993377483%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;1 \u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"9.271523178807946%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;4 \u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"21.52317880794702%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u0026nbsp;Positive Urine Test (N)\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"11.258278145695364%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;NA\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"10.264900662251655%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;NA\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"10.76158940397351%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;4 \u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"10.76158940397351%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;2 \u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"10.76158940397351%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;2 \u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"15.397350993377483%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;0 \u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"9.271523178807946%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;8 \u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003c/tbody\u003e\n\u003c/table\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003csup\u003e1\u003c/sup\u003e Not applicable.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDuring the interviews at the start of the pilot study, it was found that all of the pregnant women were unemployed (n=7, 100.0%), all had attempted to stop smoking in the past (n=7, 100.0%), and most of them had health issues (n=6, 85.7%)(Table 3). The majority of the women started smoking at a young age, contributing to an average of 15 years of smoking, and the majority (n=5, 71.4%) also smoked inside their houses. Furthermore, the majority of women endured problems in their private situations, such as financial issues (n=5; 71.4%) or relational issues with partner or family (n=5; 71.4%). There were no distinctive differences between the case of the women who completed the pilot study and the women who dropped out.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eWhen asked for the motivation to participate in the pilot study, the majority was motivated to participate due to the unborn child\u0026rsquo;s health. Some women also mentioned that the pilot study acted as extra motivation. All of the women had attempted smoking cessation, of which only two women (n=2, 28.5%) were once successful in the past, and all repeatedly affirmed that it was difficult for them to stop smoking. Women saw addiction (n=4, 57.1%), stress (n=6, 85.7%) and routine (n=5, 71.4%) as the main obstacles to successfully quit smoking. To illustrate this, someone quoted, \u003cem\u003e\u0026ldquo; (\u0026hellip;) when I faced difficult times during my life, I started smoking again (\u0026hellip;)\u0026rdquo;\u003c/em\u003e(Table 4)\u003cem\u003e.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003eOther aspects that influenced their smoking cessation attempts were family or friends smoking in close proximity.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eTable 3. Characteristics of women at the start of the pilot study who participated in semi structured interviews (n=7).\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ctable border=\"0\" cellpadding=\"0\" cellspacing=\"0\" width=\"0\"\u003e\n \u003ctbody\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"76.52892561983471%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCHARACTERISTICS PREGNANT WOMEN\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"23.47107438016529%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eN (%)\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"76.52892561983471%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eAge (years)\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e20-25\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e26-30\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e31-35\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e36-40\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"23.47107438016529%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e3 (42.9)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1 (14.3)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e2 (28.6)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1 (14.3)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"76.52892561983471%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003ePregnancy\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eFirst\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eSecond\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eThird\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"23.47107438016529%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e2 (28.6)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e3 (42.9)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e2 (28.6)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"76.52892561983471%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eGestation (weeks)\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e8+0 \u0026ndash; 10+6\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e11+0 \u0026ndash; 13+6\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e14+0 \u0026ndash; 16+6\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e17+0 \u0026ndash; 19+6\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e20+0 \u0026ndash; 22+6\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e23+0 \u0026ndash; 25+6\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"23.47107438016529%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e2 (28.6)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e2 (28.6)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1 (14.3)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0 (0.0)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1 (14.3)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1 (14.3)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"76.52892561983471%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eEmployment\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eYes\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eNo\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"23.47107438016529%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0 (0.0)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e7 (100.0)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"76.52892561983471%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eYears of smoking\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026lt; 5 years\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e5-10 years\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e10-15 years\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026gt; 15 years\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"23.47107438016529%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0 (0.0)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1 (14.3)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e4 (57.1)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e2 (28.6)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"76.52892561983471%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003ePrevious smoking cessation attempt\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eYes\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eNo \u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"23.47107438016529%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e7 (100.0)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0 (0.0)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"76.52892561983471%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003ePrivate problems\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"23.47107438016529%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"76.52892561983471%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eRelational issues (with partner and/or family)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eFinancial issues\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"23.47107438016529%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e5 (71.4)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e5 (71.4)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"76.52892561983471%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eHealth issues\u003csup\u003e1\u003c/sup\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eYes\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eNo\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"23.47107438016529%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e6 (85.7)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1 (14.3)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003c/tbody\u003e\n\u003c/table\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003csup\u003e1\u003c/sup\u003e Health issues include Crohn\u0026rsquo;s disease, HELLP syndrome, preeclampsia, hereditary disorder, gestational diabetes, and peri-gestational haemorrhage.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eTable 4. Code tree of the conducted interviews with the pregnant women (n=7) including the themes, categories, subcategories, codes, quotes and anonymised participant IDs. \u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ctable border=\"0\" cellpadding=\"0\" cellspacing=\"0\" width=\"0\"\u003e\n \u003ctbody\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"23.778501628664497%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCODE TREE \u0026nbsp;- THEMES (CATEGORY)\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd colspan=\"2\" valign=\"top\" width=\"17.58957654723127%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eSUBCATEGORY\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"15.309446254071661%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCODE\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd colspan=\"2\" valign=\"top\" width=\"27.850162866449512%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eQUOTE\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"15.472312703583063%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003ePARTICIPANT\u0026nbsp;\u003cbr\u003e ID\u003csup\u003e1\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"23.778501628664497%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eSmoking \u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003ePositive influence on smoking cessation\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd colspan=\"2\" valign=\"top\" width=\"17.58957654723127%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eActivity\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eAid with smoking cessation\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"15.309446254071661%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eDistraction\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eTaking distance\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eEating\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eFocus\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eHobby\u0026rsquo;s\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eHousehold\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eAvoidance\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eSocial\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eSport\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eApproach\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eExternal support\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eRequest for help\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eInternal support\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eNicotine replacements\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eSelf\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd colspan=\"2\" valign=\"top\" width=\"27.850162866449512%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u0026ldquo;Usually I get up and then I know if I, when I get up and I have breakfast and do my things first, then um, I don\u0026rsquo;t have to smoke anymore\u0026rdquo;\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u0026ldquo;... I\u0026apos;ve also decided not to go to friends for a while, this week anyway, so that I won\u0026apos;t be tempted either.\u0026rdquo;\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u0026ldquo;\u0026hellip; \u0026nbsp;well in the first week you just have to try to distract yourself that way ...\u0026rdquo;\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u0026ldquo;... when I have the ultrasound, that you can hear the heartbeat that I will become more aware of oh yes I really have something in my belly \u0026hellip;\u0026rdquo;\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u0026ldquo;\u0026hellip; hobby is photography, but uh, that\u0026apos;s also paused at the moment. But I plan to do that again.\u0026rdquo;\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u0026ldquo;Cleaning up, tidying up.\u0026rdquo;\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u0026ldquo;Yes, especially with my boyfriend, when I, um, know that there is really nothing in the house. That there is nothing to look for ...\u0026rdquo;\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u0026ldquo;Yes indeed, and my best friend also has 2 children, so you spend a lot of time together\u0026rdquo;\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u0026ldquo;\u0026hellip; pregnancy yoga first and I want to continue that later, \u0026hellip;, you will fully relax yourself ...\u0026rdquo;\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u0026ldquo;... without there being, um, a pointing finger ...\u0026rdquo;\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u0026ldquo;\u0026hellip; because you have to stop (\u0026hellip;) not only my environment but eeh, also people in the hospital ...\u0026rdquo;\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u0026ldquo;And now I wonder, maybe it would be like this (\u0026hellip;) if I had perhaps had, then it might have been that I would have stopped longer\u0026rdquo;\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u0026ldquo;... my friend gets angry if I smoke. But the rest of the environment is not so judgmental and angry.\u0026rdquo;\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u0026ldquo;... I would like to use nicotine patches. But then if I do urine test you still have that, it still has, uh, nicotine in it.\u0026rdquo;\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u0026ldquo;I\u0026apos;m really like eeh, yes I want it myself and I really support it so ehm, I can do that ...\u0026rdquo;\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"15.472312703583063%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eU08\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eU08\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eU11\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eM02\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eU05\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eU04\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eU11\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eM02\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eU05\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eS12\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eU05\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eU04\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eU04\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eU04\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eU05\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"23.778501628664497%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eNegative influence on smoking cessation\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd colspan=\"2\" valign=\"top\" width=\"17.58957654723127%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eCounteractions\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"15.309446254071661%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eBarrier\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003ePerseverance\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eTo deny\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eRushed\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eTemptation\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd colspan=\"2\" valign=\"top\" width=\"27.850162866449512%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u0026ldquo;... after that there was no sympathy for the fact that I did smoke ... he reacted so angry that we got into a fight.\u0026rdquo;\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u0026ldquo;... not motivated enough to ...\u0026rdquo;\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u0026ldquo;And then you no longer assume things that can go wrong.\u0026rdquo;\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u0026ldquo;... I\u0026apos;m already doing really well and then I\u0026apos;m going to seven milligrams, well and then I\u0026apos;m done with it and I overestimated myself in that.\u0026rdquo;\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u0026ldquo;... then I was with friends again and then, yes, give me a cigarette too, yes then you start again.\u0026rdquo;\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"15.472312703583063%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eU04\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eU04\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eU08\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eU04\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eU11\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"23.778501628664497%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd colspan=\"2\" valign=\"top\" width=\"17.58957654723127%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eReasons to smoke\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"15.309446254071661%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eReward\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eRelaxation\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eSmoking thoughts\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eRoutine\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003ePeace\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eStress\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eAddiction\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eBoredom\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eFancy\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd colspan=\"2\" valign=\"top\" width=\"27.850162866449512%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u0026ldquo;... because I no longer smoke weed, I still smoke, because it is so good that I did stop smoking weed. That\u0026apos;s my reward.\u0026rdquo;\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u0026ldquo;... now let\u0026apos;s relax through ...\u0026rdquo;\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u0026ldquo;And then it was really every day that I still thought, I have to, I have to, I have to, I have to.\u0026rdquo;\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u0026ldquo;Yes, really dinner \u0026hellip; I used to have, did I have in the morning that I thought now I\u0026apos;m going to have a cup of coffee and a cigarette ...\u0026rdquo;\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u0026ldquo;When I smoke a cigarette, I calm down too.\u0026rdquo;\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u0026ldquo;Then I ended up in a stressful situation again, so yes. Then you soon reach for a cigarette again.\u0026rdquo;\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u0026ldquo;... because I have smoked now and then in between, you still have the taste for a bit ...\u0026rdquo;\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u0026ldquo;... when you are home alone \u0026hellip; I found it very difficult not to smoke because it was so quiet.\u0026rdquo;\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u0026ldquo;... every now and then you just feel like a cigarette.\u0026rdquo;\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"15.472312703583063%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eU04\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eU08\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eU04\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eU05\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eU05\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eU05\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eM02\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eU08\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eU05\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"23.778501628664497%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eSmoking behaviour\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd colspan=\"2\" valign=\"top\" width=\"17.58957654723127%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eLocation\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eTobacco products\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"15.309446254071661%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eInside\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eOutside\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eE-cigarette\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eCigarette\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eWeed\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd colspan=\"2\" valign=\"top\" width=\"27.850162866449512%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u0026ldquo;\u0026hellip; usually in the kitchen with a window open, but not in the room.\u0026rdquo;\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u0026ldquo;Not even on the balcony, \u0026hellip; just go outside.\u0026rdquo;\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u0026ldquo;... electric. I did that for a while.\u0026rdquo;\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u0026ldquo;I actually smoke cigarettes.\u0026rdquo;\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u0026ldquo;... before my pregnancy, um, I smoked weed too \u0026hellip;.\u0026rdquo;\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"15.472312703583063%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eU08\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eU05\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eU04\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eU08\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eU04\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"23.778501628664497%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eSmoking cessation \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd colspan=\"2\" valign=\"top\" width=\"17.58957654723127%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eAttempt to quit\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eConsequences\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"15.309446254071661%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eFed up\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eEasy\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eFailed attempt\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eHard\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003ePeriod\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eRegret\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eDate of stopping\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eSuccessful attempt\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eProud\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eUsed to\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eWithdrawal symptoms\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eSymptomatic aid\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd colspan=\"2\" valign=\"top\" width=\"27.850162866449512%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026ldquo;\u003cem\u003eIt is, yes, just a shame \u0026hellip;\u0026rdquo;\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u0026ldquo;... it\u0026apos;s okay (...) I actually stopped quite easily.\u0026rdquo;\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u0026ldquo;... I did smoke a few times again, when I faced difficult times during my life, I started smoking again\u0026rdquo;\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u0026ldquo;... it is very difficult for me to quit smoking.\u0026rdquo;\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u0026ldquo;... I quit on my own for three months.\u0026rdquo;\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u0026ldquo;Because then I have those side effects and now I also like well, I should have done this much sooner actually ...\u0026rdquo;\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u0026ldquo;... I have something like (...) I\u0026apos;m going to start quitting today ...\u0026rdquo;\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u0026ldquo;I pretty much stopped together with him, actually.\u0026rdquo;\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u0026ldquo;... I am kind of proud but it doesn\u0026apos;t feel um, I am not very proud. Because I (...) now also like, well, I should have done this much earlier actually ...\u0026rdquo;\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u0026ldquo;... now that was really after three days that I really didn\u0026apos;t have that anymore.\u0026rdquo;\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u0026ldquo;Uh, yeah the first few days it was just that I was um, really cranky.\u0026rdquo;\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u0026ldquo;Yes, I still got a prescription from the midwife, um, yes, the midwife gave me, um, something.\u0026rdquo;\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"15.472312703583063%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eS01\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eU04\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eU05\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eU08\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eU05\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eU04\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eU05\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eM02\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eU04\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eU04\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eU04\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eU04\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"23.778501628664497%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003ePregnancy\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003ePregnancy\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd colspan=\"2\" valign=\"top\" width=\"17.58957654723127%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"15.309446254071661%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eUncomplicated pregnancy\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003ePreparations\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003ePregnancy ailments\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd colspan=\"2\" valign=\"top\" width=\"27.850162866449512%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u0026ldquo;Yes, I am happy to have a new pregnancy. (\u0026hellip;) But if I hear more and more things are going well, then, um, I am more relaxed myself.\u0026rdquo;\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u0026ldquo;... well at home I\u0026apos;m still busy with the nursery of course and buying clothes and things like that, so I\u0026apos;m preparing well, yes.\u0026rdquo;\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u0026ldquo;If something makes you nauseous all at once and then all at once, you\u0026apos;ve just eaten, well everything will come out again.\u0026rdquo;\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"15.472312703583063%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eU08\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eU05\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eU08\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd colspan=\"2\" valign=\"top\" width=\"25.0814332247557%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eSocial\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eEconomic situation\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"16.286644951140065%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd colspan=\"2\" valign=\"top\" width=\"16.449511400651467%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eFinancial\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003ePreliminary education\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eEmployment\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eUnemployed\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"26.710097719869708%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u0026ldquo;... because I have a benefit, after about two or three weeks (...) my money is normal, so low that I cannot, um, spend twenty euros on it because I still have 50 euros for groceries ...\u0026rdquo;\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u0026ldquo;... lower vocational education, but I have been working since I was eighteen ...\u0026rdquo;\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u0026ldquo;I just got back to work ,so I\u0026apos;m going to work for the first time today.\u0026rdquo;\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u0026ldquo;... and now I stopped working again ...\u0026rdquo;\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"15.472312703583063%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eU04\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eU05\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eU08\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eU08\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd colspan=\"2\" valign=\"top\" width=\"25.0814332247557%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003ePerson\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"16.286644951140065%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd colspan=\"2\" valign=\"top\" width=\"16.449511400651467%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eHealth\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eDeceased child\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003ePersonal\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"26.710097719869708%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u0026ldquo;Yes and eeh, then I got eeh, Crohn\u0026apos;s disease \u0026hellip;, so I have to gradually rebuild everything a bit.\u0026rdquo;\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u0026ldquo;... I also had a miscarriage before at 11 weeks ...\u0026rdquo;\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u0026ldquo;And, well, I found those telephone contacts, um, that I found it really difficult to be open to others\u0026rdquo;\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"15.472312703583063%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eU05\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eM02\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eU04\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd colspan=\"2\" valign=\"top\" width=\"25.0814332247557%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eResearch\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eTest\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"16.286644951140065%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd colspan=\"2\" valign=\"top\" width=\"16.449511400651467%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eNegative test\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003ePositive test\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"26.710097719869708%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u0026ldquo;... it is indeed negative ...\u0026rdquo;\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u0026ldquo;... we had expected it a bit, unfortunately, \u0026hellip;, but there was no second line to be seen and that actually means that there is still cotinine in the urine\u0026rdquo;\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"15.472312703583063%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eU04\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eU08\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd colspan=\"2\" valign=\"top\" width=\"25.0814332247557%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eReason to stop smoking\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"16.286644951140065%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd colspan=\"2\" valign=\"top\" width=\"16.449511400651467%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003ePurpose\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eChild\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"26.710097719869708%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u0026ldquo;... I just know there is, a creature living inside me, a daughter, \u0026hellip; that stands up, really number one for me, so that\u0026apos;s what I\u0026apos;m doing it for.\u0026rdquo;\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u0026ldquo;... then you also realize it more, there is something in my belly . There\u0026apos;s a creature in my belly.\u0026rdquo;\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"15.472312703583063%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eU05\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eU05\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd colspan=\"2\" valign=\"top\" width=\"25.0814332247557%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eOther\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"16.286644951140065%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd colspan=\"2\" valign=\"top\" width=\"16.449511400651467%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eInterest\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eAim\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eFeedback\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"26.710097719869708%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u0026ldquo;I think it is very important, after all I have been through ...\u0026rdquo;\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u0026ldquo;I was already looking at second-hand but now I\u0026apos;m like oh, maybe I can get a new one.\u0026rdquo;\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u0026ldquo;... that also feels good, I have also been in conversations that one is only talking and the other is just sitting around, so this is, I just like this.\u0026rdquo;\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" width=\"15.472312703583063%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eU08\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eU04\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eU05\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003c/tbody\u003e\n\u003c/table\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u003csup\u003e1\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/em\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u0026nbsp;ID = Identity Documentation, generated by the first letter of the hospital recruiting the pregnant women and the number representing the month in which they were born.\u003c/em\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003ePhase 4: Evaluation of Pilot study\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAll healthcare professionals (midwives, medical nurses, n=5) were enthusiastic about the financial-incentive-intervention pilot study, both prior to as after conducting the study. Some professionals were hesitant at first, as they thought the incentives were unfair to the non-smoking pregnant women. Despite this, they all acknowledged the importance of pregnant women to stop smoking and were pleased to convey this novel approach for smoking cessation in pregnant women. Aside from the positive feedback assembled during these contacts, a few suggestions were offered for possible future implication. The healthcare professionals in the hospitals commented that they think it would be more successful to include more pregnant women from midwifery practices instead of hospitals\u0026rsquo; inclusion. They argued that many pregnant women in the hospital are more complex due to their medical situation as well as their social situation, possibly negatively influencing the pilot study. Additionally, the midwives stated that they have a large number of smoking pregnant women in their practice. The low inclusion number was, according to them, caused by a short period of inclusion and colleagues forgetting to mention the pilot study and not due to pregnant women not willing to participate in the pilot study. \u0026nbsp;Additionally, all healthcare professionals mentioned that the pilot study\u0026rsquo;s execution was not troublesome, and they had no further suggestions about the practicality of execution in retrospect.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; Furthermore, pregnant women were also asked about their experiences with the pilot study, about financial incentives for smoking cessation for pregnant women in general and suggestions for future implications. Overall, the pregnant women assented that they were well informed about the study before they started. The appointments were experienced as pleasant, although some mentioned being ashamed about their smoking habits and found it hard to talk about it with healthcare professionals. All pregnant women thought of the financial-incentive-intervention as a helpful approach for pregnant women to stop smoking. Women also shared the perceptions of their partners about the financial incentives for smoking cessation and most of them (n=5) were positive about the intervention, since they acknowledged the importance of stopping smoking for their unborn child and wanted their partner to be able to abstain smoking during the pregnancy. It must be acknowledged that not all partners felt the same way about this and believed that the women should be able to stop without any help, as mentioned either by themselves when present or reported by the pregnant women about their partners. Along with the study, the researchers noticed that some pregnant women (n=4; 57.1%) desired additional support in the form of professional help. Therefore, they were provided with information about possible options such as support by telephone or therapy by another healthcare professional. \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eMoreover, the qualitative data from the conducted interviews with the nine pregnant women found that the main factors essential for the successfulness of smoking cessation were the absence of stress, stable home situation and support from the environment, as shown in Table 4.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eLastly, the prosperity and practicality of the pilot study were assessed. At the end of the pilot study, one out of nine pregnant women was able to abstain from smoking utilizing the financial-incentive-intervention. In total, 11 vouchers (7x \u0026euro;25,-; 2x \u0026euro;50,-; 1x \u0026euro;100; 1x \u0026euro;150,-) were given during the pilot study to different pregnant women, representing the financial-incentive-intervention practicality in clinical practice.\u0026nbsp;\u003cbr\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Discussion","content":"\u003cp\u003eThis study was a feasibility study of implementing financial incentives to encourage pregnant women in the Northern Netherlands to quit smoking. During this study, it was found that it was possible to implement the pilot study at different healthcare institutions, and it appeared that participants, healthcare professionals and affiliated institutions wanted to collaborate. In the pilot study, factors negatively influencing smoking cessation were stress, home situation, \u0026nbsp;and lack of support from their surroundings. In total, 55.1% of the Dutch population sample, who completed the online survey, indicated that a \u0026nbsp;financial incentive was inappropriate for smoking cessation in pregnant women. However, it must be mentioned that this population sample may not perfectly represent the Dutch population, since the majority of the respondents were women (n=266, 81.1%). Moreover, the distribution of the questionnaire might have caused biased inclusions due to distribution via personal Facebook sites of students of Medical Sciences, resulting in the recruitment of their acquaintances as well as unknowns. This opinion is nevertheless similar to other published research in which the utilization of financial incentives in healthcare was seen as unfair compared to standard interventions and depended on the extent to which the target group was seen as responsible for their smoking behaviour [12, 17]. In addition, it was also seen that respondents with a younger age, women, smokers who tried to quit, and respondents with a higher education answered significantly more positively to the ten statements, of which only age was found to be significant in our study [12].\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eHowever, other studies with pregnant women who smoke and the use of incentives as motivation to quit have indicated that this is a successful intervention [10,11,18-20]. One study found that smoking pregnant women mainly had smoking cessation problems due to environmental barriers, mainly from family smoking status, which was also found in our study [21].\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThis study had several limitations. Firstly, the limited respondent group did not correctly represent the population in our study\u0026rsquo;s several phases. The pilot study participants were mainly unemployed pregnant women with low SES, which could indicate that this population benefits the most from the financial-incentive-intervention. Although low SES was represented during the pilot study, this population was not appropriately represented in the online questionnaire, which was mainly answered by respondents with a high SES [23].\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe limited group size also applies to the pilot study participants, which was estimated higher prior to the study. The limitations may have led to inclusion bias, in which only pregnant women of lower socioeconomic class wanted to participate. Inclusion bias might also have occurred in the questionnaire, in which the most outspoken respondents may have taken part. Furthermore, due to the small sample size, no statement could yet be made about the prosperity of implementing the financial-incentive-intervention in clinical practice. Moreover, it is hard to conclude about the prosperousness of the sample size in future studies, since the total number of approached and eligible women were not collected during this study. It is therefore not known how many eligible participants have been missed. \u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eSecondly, this study has a high dropout rate as only one participant completed the study. There were no distinctive differences established that could explain the successfulness of this participant compared to the dropouts. The majority of the participants who dropped out (n=8, 62.5%) did not show up to or cancelled the scheduled appointments. During the pilot study, it appeared that as a result of the cancellations and the consecutively rescheduling, the duration between the different appointments was more than the desired three weeks, occasionally resulting in noncompliance with the study design. It often turned out to be rather challenging to contact the concerned participants, resulting in no follow-up appointments. A review by Dantas et al. on contributing factors to missing appointments found that the use of tobacco and young patients with low socioeconomic status living far away from the clinic are important contributing factors [24]. According to the authors, it is advisable to plan as many appointments as possible in advance for participants where the risk is high. Although this has also been tried as much as possible in this study, it may be useful to pay more attention to this in a follow-up study. In addition, several participants mentioned they stopped because missing the last reimbursement due to a positive cotinine urine test took away the motivation, and the study was experienced as stressful. The stress of the study was in addition to the stress that many participants experienced because of their private situation and the medical complications during their pregnancy. This exposure to stress raises questions about whether it might be better to give a fixed amount for each appointment instead of an incremental amount, whether the interval between amounts should be reduced, or whether more appointments should be scheduled. Moreover, it should be considered to offer the pregnant women standardised additional support in the form of professional help, such as telephone support or specialized addiction care support, to be incorporated in the study design of the financial-incentive-intervention. [13,25]\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Conclusion","content":"\u003cp\u003eIn conclusion, this study offered promising opportunities for smoking cessation in pregnant women to reduce the consecutive harmful impact on the health of both the pregnant women and their unborn child. Acceptability is a critical point for further continuation of this study, both from the population, where there was an adverse reaction to rewarding the participants, as from the pregnant women, where little was either achieved with smoking cessation during this study. Notwithstanding, it can be said that practicality and implementation have been met on various points of feasibility. In defiance of the limited study population this study demonstrated the proof of concept of the financial-incentive-intervention to be feasible for implementation. A follow-up study needs to be performed to confirm this pilot\u0026rsquo;s study feasibility and prove the effectiveness of the financial-incentive-intervention in a larger study population, which could be achieved by tackling the aforementioned limitations. It would then be important to recruit more pregnant women at primary-care midwifery practises, so pregnant women with and without medical concerns are equally represented in the study population. Furthermore, standardised additional professional help should be incorporated in the study design to provide additional support in smoking cessation, reduce the exposure to stress, and possibly prevent the high number of dropouts. Dropouts should further be limited by scheduling more appointments in advance to avoid high number of no-shows. If future studies would then prove the effectiveness of the intervention to reduce the number of smoking accordingly reduce the high prevalence of pregnant women smoking in Dutch areas with lower socioeconomic status and diminish the consecutively harmful exposure to tobacco to both mother and child.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Abbreviations","content":"\u003cp\u003eSES\u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp;Socioeconomic status\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eUMCG\u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;University Medical Centre Groningen\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eMZH\u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp;Martini Hospital Groningen\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eVSP \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; Verloskundige Stadspraktijk Groningen \u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Declarations","content":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eEthics approval and consent to participate\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe study protocol was approved by the Medical Ethics Research Committee of the UMCG (nr 201800826) and were performed in accordance with the applicable guidelines and regulations. Informed consent was given by each participant incorporated in the study. \u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eConsent for publication\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eNot applicable.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eAvailability of data and materials\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAll data generated or analysed during this study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCompeting interests\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe authors declare that they have no competing interests.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eFunding\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe authors received funding from ZonMW for the project \u0026ldquo;Together we\u0026rsquo;ll quit smoking!\u0026rdquo; (531003018).\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAdditional funding was obtained from the Department of Obstetrics (UMCG) and Noord Negentig for the conduction of the pilot study, more specifically for the purchase of the utilised vouchers.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eAuthor\u0026rsquo;s contributions\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eTK, AR, MH, LH, and LK equally contributed to the conception, execution of the designed study, and the analysis of the feasibility study concerning financial incentives for smoking cessation in pregnant women. JE was the main supervisor during the conception, execution and analysis of the feasibility study, and was a major contributor in rewriting the manuscript. TK drafted the original manuscript and created the final tables and figures. LP contributed with the design of the feasibility study, and was the main supervisor for the reviewing and editing of the manuscript. All authors read, commented and approved the submitted version of the manuscript.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eAcknowledgements\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eWe would like to thank all Dutch respondents to the online questionnaire and pregnant women participating in the pilot study for their contribution to our study. Additionally, we would like to show our gratitude to all the healthcare professionals and affiliated institutions collaborating in this study. \u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"References","content":"\u003col\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eCnattingius S. The epidemiology of smoking during pregnancy: Smoking prevalence, maternal characteristics, and pregnancy outcomes. Nicotine and Tobacco Research. 2004 Apr; 6: Suppl2 :S125-40.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eAndres RL, Day MC. Perinatal complications associated with maternal tobacco use. Semin Neonatal. 2000 Aug; 5(3):231-41.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eThacher JD, Gehring U, Gruzieva O, Standi M, Pershagen G, Bauer CP, et al. Maternal smoking during pregnancy and early childhood and development of asthma and rhinoconjunctivitis \u0026ndash; a MeDALL project. Environ Health Perspect. 2018 Apr 12; 126(4):047005.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eCroes E, de Josselin de Jong S. Roken en Zwangerschap [Internet]. Trimbos-Instituut. 2014 [cited 2020 Jun 12]. Available from: https://www.trimbos.nl/docs/625c3ca9-3d55-4c4c-87b3-3318e3fcec95.pdf.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eAddendum Werkgroep. Addendum Behandeling van tabaksverslaving en stoppen-met-roken ondersteuning bij zwangere vrouwen [Internet]. Trimbos-Instituut. 2017 [cited 2020 Jul 4]. Available from: https://www.trimbos.nl/docs/8dcff786-e1b2-4556-8220-7ca285531b6c.pdf.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eSociaal Centraal Planbureau. Sociaaleconomische status 2017 [Internet]. Rijksinstituut voor Volksgezondheid en Milieu. 2017 [cited 2020 Jun 18]. Available from: https://www.volksgezondheidenzorg.info/onderwerp/sociaaleconomische-status/regionaal-internationaal/regionaal#node-sociaaleconomische-status.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eDe Wolff MG, Backhausen MG, Iversen ML, Bendix JM, Rom AL, Hegaard HK. Prevalence and predictors of maternal smoking prior to and during pregnancy in a regional Danish population: A cross-sectional study. Reprod Health. 2019 Jun 14; 16(1):82.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eMohsin M, Bauman AE. Socio-demographic factors associated with smoking and smoking cessation among 426,344 pregnant women in New South Wales, Australia. BMC Public Health. 2005 Dec 21; 5(1):138.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eScheffers-van Schayck T, den Hollander W, van Belzen E, Monshouwer K, Tuithof M. Monitor Middelengebruik en Zwangerschap 2018 [Internet]. Trimbos-Instituut. 2019 [cited 2020 Jun 12]. Available from: https://www.trimbos.nl/docs/a11ec803-9674-43dd-a624-eff8a4b3ad8f.pdf.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eBroer J. Roken moeder tijdens zwangerschap 2015-2018. GGD Groningen, Rapp Jeugdgezondheidsz 2019. 2019.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eGGD Groningen. Percentage zwangeren dat rookt \u0026ndash; Gemeenten (2019) [Internet]. GGD Groningen. 2019. Available from: https://ggdgroningen.incijfers.nl/jive?workspace_guid=29270ad7-4b84-4971-940a-353854a7c907.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eCahill K, Hartmann-Boyce J, Perera R. Incentives for smoking cessation. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2015; 18(5):4307.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eTappin D, Bauld L, Purves D, Boyd K, Sinclair L, MacAskill S, et al. Financial incentives for smoking cessation in pregnacy: Randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2015 Jan 27; 350.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eBerlin N, Goldzahl L, Bauld L, Hoddinott P, Berlin I. Public acceptability of financial incentives to reward pregnant smokers who quit smoking: a United-Kingdom-France comparison. Eur J Heal Econ. 2018 Jun 1; 19(5):697-708.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eWen X, Higgins ST, Xie C, Epstein LH. Improving Public Acceptability of Using Financial Incentives for Smoking Cessation During Pregnancy: A Randomized Controlled Experiment. Nicotine Tob Res. 2016 May 1; 18(5):913-8.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eBowen DJ, Kreuter M, Spring B, Cofta-Woerpel L, Linnan L, Weiner D, et al. How We Design Feasibility Studies. Am J Prev Med. 2009 May; 36(5):452-457.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eB.V. N von Minden. Drug-screen COT 200 test 1x50 teststrips [Internet]. Available from: https://www.nal-vonminden.com/nl/drug-screen-cot-200-test-1x50-teststrips.html.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eHall ES, Wexelblatt SL, Greenberg JM. Self-reported and laboratory evaluation of late pregnancy nicotine exposure and drugs of abuse. J Perinatol. 2016 Oct 1; 36(10):814-8.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eAchilihu H, Feng J, Wang L, Bernert JT. Tobacco Use Classification by Inexpensive Urinary Cotinine Immunoassay Test Strips. J Anal Toxicol. 2019 Mar 1; 43(2):149-53.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eWickstrom R. Effects of Nicotine During Pregnancy: Human and Experimental Evidence. Curr Neuropharmacol. 2007 Aug 30; 5(3):213-22.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eColeman T, Britton J, Thornton J. Nicotine replacement therapy in pregnancy. BMJ. 2004 Apr 24; 328(7446):965-6.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eErlingsson C, Brysiewicz P. A hands-on guide to doing content analysis. Afr J Emerg Med. 2017 Sep; 7(3):93-9.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eFeijen-de Jong EI, van der Pijl M, Vedam S, Jansen DEMC, Peters LL. Measuring respect and autonomy in Dutch maternity care: Applicability of two measures. Women and Birth. 2020 Sep 1; 33(5):e447-54.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eDantas LF, Fleck JL, Cyrino Oliveira FL, Hamacher S. No-shows in appointment scheduling \u0026ndash; a systematic literature review. Health Policy. 2018 Apr; 122(4):412-421.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eWeiland S, Warmelink JC, Peters LL, Berger MY, Erwich JJHM, Jansen DEMC. The needs of women and their partners regarding professional smoking cessation support during pregnancy: A qualitative study. Women Birth. 2021 Mar; S1871-5192(21)00046-9.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ol\u003e"}],"fulltextSource":"","fullText":"","funders":[],"hasAdminPriorityOnWorkflow":false,"hasManuscriptDocX":true,"hasOptedInToPreprint":true,"hasPassedJournalQc":"","hasAnyPriority":false,"hideJournal":false,"highlight":"","institution":"","isAcceptedByJournal":true,"isAuthorSuppliedPdf":false,"isDeskRejected":"","isHiddenFromSearch":false,"isInQc":false,"isInWorkflow":false,"isPdf":false,"isPdfUpToDate":true,"isWithdrawnOrRetracted":false,"journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"bmc-pregnancy-and-childbirth","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"externalIdentity":"prch","sideBox":"Learn more about [BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth](http://bmcpregnancychildbirth.biomedcentral.com/)","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"https://www.editorialmanager.com/prch/default.aspx","title":"BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth","twitterHandle":"@BMC_series","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"em","reportingPortfolio":"BMC Series","inReviewEnabled":true,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true},"keywords":"financial incentives, feasibility study, smoking cessation, pregnancy, contingent, public acceptability, intervention, cotinine","lastPublishedDoi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-1652235/v1","lastPublishedDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-1652235/v1","license":{"name":"CC BY 4.0","url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"manuscriptAbstract":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eBackground \u003c/strong\u003eThe high prevalence of smoking pregnant women in Dutch areas with lower socioeconomic status and the consecutively harmful exposure to tobacco to both mother and child, depicted a high need for a novel intervention. According to other studies, the utilisation of financial incentives appeared to be a promising method for smoking cessation in pregnant women. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the feasibility of implementing contingent financial incentives as smoking cessation support for pregnant women in the Netherlands.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eMethods \u003c/strong\u003eFeasibility study consisting of four developmental phases: (1) acceptability of Dutch population regarding financial-incentive-intervention by conducting an online questionnaire, (2) composing a pilot study utilising the financial-incentive-intervention in clinical practice, (3) execution of the composed pilot study and (4) evaluation of the executed pilot study utilising a mixed-methods approach. \u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eA financial-incentive-intervention, given in a contingent financial scheme (during five consequential appointments, respectively €25/€50/€100/€150/€250), if smoking abstinence was proven by the amount of cotinine in the urine of the pregnant women measured utilising a urine dipstick test.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThe public acceptability for the financial-incentive-intervention was assessed using 5-Likert scales. The number of pregnant women able to abstain from smoking during the pilot study and utilising the financial-incentive-intervention in clinical practice were used to assess the prosperity and practicality of the pilot study respectively. The pilot study was evaluated using a mixed-methods approach.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eResults \u003c/strong\u003eIn total, 55.1% of the Dutch population sample (n=328) found a financial incentive inappropriate for smoking cessation in pregnant women, while the healthcare professionals and pilot study participants thought the financial-incentive-intervention to be a helpful approach. Eleven vouchers were given during the pilot study, and one woman completed all test points and tested negative for cotinine at the end of the pilot study.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eConclusion \u003c/strong\u003eAlthough the financial-incentive-intervention appeared to be a promising approach for smoking cessation in pregnant women, the acceptability of the Dutch population and the number of pregnant women able to abstain smoking during this pilot study was low. Despite the limited study population, this study proved the concept of this financial-incentive-intervention to be feasible for implementation in the Netherlands. \u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eTrial registration:\u003c/strong\u003e Not applicable since this is a feasibility study prior to a trial.\u003c/p\u003e","manuscriptTitle":"Smoking cessation in pregnant women using financial incentives: a feasibility study.","msid":"","msnumber":"","nonDraftVersions":[{"code":1,"date":"2022-05-25 16:32:21","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-1652235/v1","editorialEvents":[{"type":"communityComments","content":0},{"type":"decision","content":"Major revision","date":"2022-09-06T06:30:58+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"editorInvitedReview","content":"","date":"2022-08-04T17:44:51+00:00","index":"hide","fulltext":""},{"type":"reviewerAgreed","content":"133567c4-264c-483b-9158-57a08e649707","date":"2022-07-28T08:25:46+00:00","index":"hide","fulltext":""},{"type":"reviewerAgreed","content":"8d448bae-04fa-4bcf-b8f4-7afcd0c7ba9c","date":"2022-06-02T06:07:43+00:00","index":"hide","fulltext":""},{"type":"reviewersInvited","content":"","date":"2022-05-31T12:17:59+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"editorAssigned","content":"","date":"2022-05-26T12:50:27+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"editorInvited","content":"","date":"2022-05-23T04:53:03+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"checksComplete","content":"","date":"2022-05-23T04:52:19+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"submitted","content":"BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth","date":"2022-05-13T08:02:12+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""}],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"bmc-pregnancy-and-childbirth","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"externalIdentity":"prch","sideBox":"Learn more about [BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth](http://bmcpregnancychildbirth.biomedcentral.com/)","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"https://www.editorialmanager.com/prch/default.aspx","title":"BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth","twitterHandle":"@BMC_series","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"em","reportingPortfolio":"BMC Series","inReviewEnabled":true,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true}}],"origin":"","ownerIdentity":"5cbc40be-1e9e-4cdf-b659-1685871c9579","owner":[],"postedDate":"May 25th, 2022","published":true,"recentEditorialEvents":[],"rejectedJournal":[],"revision":"","amendment":"","status":"under-review","subjectAreas":[],"tags":[],"updatedAt":"2022-12-07T11:29:21+00:00","versionOfRecord":[],"versionCreatedAt":"2022-05-25 16:32:21","video":"","vorDoi":"","vorDoiUrl":"","workflowStages":[]},"version":"v1","identity":"rs-1652235","journalConfig":"researchsquare"},"__N_SSP":true},"page":"/article/[identity]/[[...version]]","query":{"redirect":"/article/rs-1652235","identity":"rs-1652235","version":["v1"]},"buildId":"7rjqhiLT3MXkJMwkYKINL","isFallback":false,"isExperimentalCompile":false,"dynamicIds":[84888],"gssp":true,"scriptLoader":[]}

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: preprint-html

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-19T01:45:01.086888+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-21T05:10:58.409756+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0