Are neuroanatomical phenotypes for psychiatric disorders robust? An assessment of the reproducibility of grey matter differences in mental illness
This study found low cross-site consistency in grey matter morphometry differences for five psychiatric disorders, suggesting current structural MRI practices are unlikely to yield robust phenotypes.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
This multicenter MRI study assessed how reproducible brain-wide grey matter volume and cortical thickness difference maps are across 59 sites for five psychiatric disorders (schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, autism spectrum disorder, major depressive disorder, and bipolar disorder), using 2437 patients and 2065 controls, and benchmarking against Alzheimer’s disease data from 7 sites. The authors found low cross-site consistency for psychiatric disorders (median pair-wise spatial correlation r ≤ 0.16) compared with Alzheimer’s disease (r = 0.54), and reported that consistency was not strongly driven by variations in demographic, clinical, or scanner characteristics and was robust to processing/analysis choices. Bootstrapping suggested schizophrenia could yield higher consistency (r > 0.5) when site-specific sample sizes exceed about 200 cases and controls, whereas other disorders likely require much larger samples and/or more phenotypically homogeneous recruitment. This paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.
Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
Full text
4,087 characters
· extracted from
oa-doi-fallback
· 2 sections
· click to expand
Abstract
Methods
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-05-28T02:00:01.590549+00:00