Species conservation profile and revision of Rhinolophus acuminatus (Chiroptera, Rhinolophidae) from Southeast Asia

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-4.0
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

Rhinolophus acuminatus was first evaluated for its conservation status in 1996, with subsequent assessments conducted in 2008 and most recently in 2019, during which it was categorized as Least Concern. These evaluations, however, were largely based on limited occurrence records and a general list of countries where the species was known to occur. Recent discoveries have documented new distribution records, indicating a broader geographic range than previously recognized. Additionally, the availability of a more precise locality data has contributed to a more comprehensive understanding of the species' distribution and ecological context. This study provides novel insights into the distribution of Rhinolophus acuminatus , including newly documented localities, an updated elevational range, and refined regional records. Notably, Sarawak (Malaysian Borneo) and Brunei were not previously recognized as part of the species’ range during its most recent IUCN assessment. We report the first confirmed occurrence of R. acuminatus in Sarawak, specifically within Gunung Mulu National Park, a UNESCO World Heritage Site known for its exceptional biodiversity and extensive limestone karst systems. Additionally, a new locality record from Labi Forest Reserve in Brunei further expands the species’ known distribution on the island of Borneo. The record from Sarawak represents a newly documented extant range within Malaysian Borneo, while the Brunei record constitutes a new country record for R. acuminatus . This study also presents the most comprehensive and detailed locality data for the species since its original description in 2019. The species’ elevational range has been revised from the previously reported maximum of 1,676 meters above sea level (a.s.l.) in the 2019 IUCN assessment to a new upper limit of 3,943 meters a.s.l., based on records from Mount Kinabalu in Sabah, Malaysian Borneo, indicating the species' presence in upper montane forest habitats. Furthermore, this study provides the first quantitative estimates of the species’ Extent of Occurrence (EOO), calculated at 6,957,361.5 km², Area of Occupancy (AOO) at 608 km², and 152 number of locations. EOO mapping further illustrates the species’ broad distribution across the Southeast Asian region. Collectively, these findings offer critical data for future reassessments of the conservation status of R. acuminatus under the IUCN Red List criteria.
Full text 1,287 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Preprint ARPHA Preprints https://doi.org/10.3897/arphapreprints.e162419 (18 Jun 2025) https://doi.org/10.3897/arphapreprints.e162419 (18 Jun 2025) Published in: Biodiversity Data Journal https://doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.13.e162374 Other versions: - Preprint InfoPreprint Info - CiteCite - MetricsMetrics - CommentComment - RelatedRelated - CitedCited ARPHA Preprints doi: 10.3897/arphapreprints.e162419 First posted 18 Jun 2025 Authors Nazifah Fitriyah Zariman - Corresponding author 1Department of Biological Sciences and Biotechnology, Faculty of Science and Technology, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, 43600, Bangi, Malaysia Juliana Senawi - Corresponding author 1Department of Biological Sciences and Biotechnology, Faculty of Science and Technology, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, 43600, Bangi, Malaysia 2Langkawi Research Centre, Tuanku Abdul Halim Mu’adzam Shah Campus, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Teluk Yu Road, Burau Bay, 07100, Langkawi, Malaysia Conflict of interest The authors have declared that no competing interests exist. This is an open access preprint distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-28T02:00:01.590549+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0