Genetic diversity and characterization of the growth promotion mechanisms of Burkholderia vietnamiensis isolates from rice cultivars in valleys of the high jungle of Peru.

Genetic diversity and characterization of the growth promotion mechanisms of Burkholderia vietnamiensis isolates from rice cultivars in valleys of the high jungle of Peru. | Research Square window.SnipcartSettings = { analytics: { enabled: false } }; (function() { var accessVector = localStorage.getItem('access_vector') || ''; window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; if (accessVector) { window.dataLayer.push({ user: { profile: { profileInfo: { snid: accessVector } } } }); } })(); (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src='https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-K279D39R'); Browse Preprints In Review Journals COVID-19 Preprints AJE Video Bytes Research Tools Research Promotion AJE Professional Editing AJE Rubriq About Preprint Platform In Review Editorial Policies Our Team Advisory Board Help Center Sign In Submit a Preprint Cite Share Download PDF Research Article Genetic diversity and characterization of the growth promotion mechanisms of Burkholderia vietnamiensis isolates from rice cultivars in valleys of the high jungle of Peru. Patricia Pilar Meza-Catalán, Nayza Rosmery Asencios-Sifuentes, and 4 more This is a preprint; it has not been peer reviewed by a journal. https://doi.org/ 10.21203/rs.3.rs-4927294/v1 This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License Status: Under Review Version 1 posted 3 You are reading this latest preprint version Abstract Burkholderia is a versatile bacterial genus and from a biotechnological point of view it is a source of various secondary metabolites with enormous application potential, especially in agriculture. The aim of this study was to isolate Gram-negative diazotrophic endophytic bacteria from rice roots, to select and study the genetic diversity of strains of the genus Burkholderia , as well as the growth promotion mechanisms and the effect of their inoculation in two rice cultivars. Seventy-eight Gram-negative diazotrophic isolates were obtained from 132 root samples of different rice varieties, of which only 5.13% was positive for rec A gene amplification with specific Burkholderia primers. Sequence analysis showed high similarity with B. vietnamiensis . These strains produced auxin in broth supplemented with tryptophan (up to 13.98 µg mL-1), siderophores (up to 139.52%), phosphate solubilization (up to 15.99 mg PO 4 mL − 1 ), so too antibiotic and antagonist capacities against five rice pathogenic fungi. These strains increased the vigour index in two rice cultivars compared to the uninoculated or unfertilised treatment. The accumulation of total biomass was high in one strain, with significant differences observed in the response to inoculation at the cultivar level. The antibiotic and antifungal activities of B. vietnamiensis strains against the two pathogenic fungi Nakataea sigmoidea and Nigrospora oryzae are described for the first time. Due to the taxonomic affinity of our strains within the Burkholderia cepacia complex, their direct use in agriculture is not recommended; however, further research is required to exploit their biotechnological potential for the synthesis of useful metabolites. recA Nitrogen fixation Auxin production Siderophores Phosphate solubilization Antagonism. Figures Figure 1 Figure 2 Figure 3 Figure 4 Introduction Burkholderia sensu lato (s.l.) (Yabuuchi et al. 1992 ) are a group of Gram-negative bacteria that are ubiquitous in different ecological niches and belong to the subphylum β-proteobacteria. Currently, phylogenetic analyzes of conserved genes and comparative genomics, the Burkholderia s.l. have reformed Burkholderia s.l. into 7 new genera: Burkholderia sensu stricto (s.s.), Caballeronia (Dobritsa et al. 2016), Paraburkholderia (Sawana et al. 2014 ), Robbsia (Lopes-Santos, 2017), Mycetohabitans and Trinickia (Estrada de los santos et al. 2018), Pararobbsia (Lin et al. 2020 ). Within the genus Burkholderia , the Burkholderia cepacia complex (Bcc) comprises a group of species from different ecological niches and their metabolic versatility (Jin et al. 2020 ). It is characterized by mobility, strictly aerobic oxygen requirement and great metabolic versatility due to the diversity of ecological niches it occupies (Adaikpoh et al. 2022 ). It includes phytobeneficial species that promote plant growth, such as B. ambifaria (Mullins et al. 2019 ), B. catarinensis (Bach et al. 2017 ), B. orbicola (Morales-Ruiz et al. 2022) and B. vietnamiensis (Wallner et al. 2022 ), as antagonists of phytopathogenic fungi and producers of metabolites of biotechnological interest (Depoorter et al. 2016 ; Elshafie and Camele, 2021 ). Burkholderia isolates have enormous biotechnological potential, as many strains are producers of hydrolytic enzymes and bioactive substances that promote plant growth and health, and degrade several recalcitrant pollutants (Eberl and Vandamme, 2016 ; Rojas-Rojas et al. 2019 ; Alam et al. 2022 ). On the other hand, some members of the Bcc have also been reported as opportunistic pathogens in humans and animals (Eberl and Vandamme, 2016 ; Fu et al. 2022 ), preventing their use as bioinoculant in the field. Plants have co-evolved with various microorganisms, allowing them to survive in hostile environmental conditions. This association between plants and microorganisms takes place at the level of the rhizosphere, endosphere and/or phyllosphere (Afzal et al. 2019 ). The relationships between plants and Burkholderia sensu stricto can be mutualistic or pathogenic. Mutualistic or phytobeneficial relationships are usually associated at the rhizosphere level (Lopes-Santos et al. 2017 ; Aba Regis et al. 2021; Draghi et al. 2021 ) or at the endosphere level (Fu et al. 2017 ; Kong et al. 2020 ; Shinjo et al. 2020 ). Among the phytobeneficial Burkholderia sensu stricto, B. vietnamiensis (Gillis et al. 1995 ) is considered a nitrogen-fixing endophyte that is characterized by a mutualistic relationship with Oryza sativa and considered a model bacterium for growth promotion in rice (Wallner et al. 2022 ; King et al. 2023 ). Several studies have been reported that B. vietnamiensis strains promote plant growth, through direct mechanisms, such as the production of phytohormones, siderophores, 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate (ACC) deaminase and nitrogen fixation, and indirect promotion mechanisms, such as biocontrol associated with the production of metabolites. antifungal, antibacterial and quorum quenching (Romero-Gutiérrez et al. 2020 ; Meng et al. 2023 ). B. vietnamiensis has been reported as an endophyte associated with Ficus tikoua (Meng et al. 2023 ), Ipomoea batatas (Shinjo et al. 2018 ), Populus trichocarpa (Xin et al. 2009 ) and very frequently in rice (Govindarajan et al. 2008 ; da Silva Araújo et al. 2013 ; Estrada et al. 2013 ; Ríos-Ruiz et al. 2020 ; Valdez-Nuñez et al. 2020 ; Kuang et al. 2024 ). The interactions between B. vietnamiensis and rice interactions are very competent and persistent in the rhizosphere, synthesising a large number of secondary metabolites and expressing direct and indirect growth mechanisms, which is why it is considered a bacterial model of growth promotion to be studied (Wallner et al. 2022 ). Recently, Liu et al ( 2022 ) demonstrated thath B. vietnamiensis could inhibit root-knot nematode on watermelon by modifying the rhizosphere microbial community. There is evidence for the growth promoting potential of B. vietnamiensis in rice (Govindarajan et al. 2008 ; Shinjo et al. 2020 ; Ríos-Ruiz et al. 2020 ). Recently, Shinjo et al. 2020 , reported that B. vietnamiensis improved rice seedlings growth, enhanced root development and increased nitrogen mobilisation and assimilation. Unfortunately, these phytobeneficial species isolated from the rhizosphere and endosphere of plants could not be used as inoculants on a commercial scale, due to a moratorium imposed in the 1990s on the grounds that they could pose a health risk (Eberl and Vandamme, 2016 ). However, in recent years, there has been an increase in the number of new Burkholderia species that are beneficial to plants and that are not isolated from clinical sources. For this reason, there is an urgent need to develop new strategies, both to reduce the use of nitrogenous fertilizers, which can be addressed through the study of phytobeneficial Burkholderia associated with rice cultivation in the San Martin region. It is important to study the genetic diversity among Burkholderia species and to resolve their taxonomy, especially to distinguish strains with phytobeneficial potential, from those with opportunistic pathogenic capacity. In addition, knowing the diversity and identity of phytobeneficial Burkholderia strains, we will be able to select strains to study at a level of genomic resolution that allows better decisions of study. The aims of this work were: 1) isolate root endophytic bacteria (potentially phytobeneficial) from rice cultivars in four valleys of the San Martín region, 2) select and identify phytobeneficial Burkholderia sensu stricto strains using specific molecular markers, 3) to study genetic diversity and the phylogenetic relationship among Burkholderia sensu stricto strains, and 4) To evaluate the direct and indirect growth promotion mechanisms of B. vietnamiensis strains and their response to inoculation in two local rice cultivars. Materials and methods Collection of rice samples Root samples of different rice varieties were collected from the Bajo Mayo, Altomayo, Alto Huallaga and Central Huallaga valleys in the San Martín-Perú region. Root samples were obtained from plants at the tillering stage according to Ji et al. ( 2014 ). Root samples were processed, coded, and transported in falcon tubes (50 mL) at 4°C. Georeferencing data and cultivation history were recorded for each sample. Isolation of endophytic bacteria from roots of rice Endophytic bacteria were isolated from roots according to the method proposed by Baldani et al. 2014 . Roots were washed with copious amount of water to remove soil remnants and immersed successively in 70% ethanol solution for 3 min, sodium hypochlorite solution (2.5%) for 5 min, 70% ethanol solution for 30 s, and rinsed five times with sterile distilled water (Sun et al. 2008 ). To confirm the success of the disinfection process, 100 µL of sterile distilled water from the last rinse of each sample were streaked on the surface on plates containing Tryptone Soy Agar (TSA) and incubated at 28°C for 3 days (Valdez et al. 2020). Only samples with no growth were considered suitable for further analysis. Root tissues were macerated with sterile physiological saline solution (0.85%) and 100 µL were inoculated into JMV nitrogen-free semi-solid medium (Baldani et al. 1996 ) containing (g L − 1 ) mannitol, 5.0; K 2 HPO 4 , 0.6; KH 2 PO 4 , 1.8; MgSO 4 7H 2 O, 0.2; NaCl, 0.1; CaCl 2 .2H 2 O, 0.2; Bromothymol blue (5 g L − 1 in 0.2 N KOH), 2 mL; FeEDTA (16.4 g L − 1 ), 4 mL; micronutrient solution, 2 mL; vitamin solution (1 mL). Distilled water is added to make up 1000 mL, pH is adjusted to 5.2 ± 0.2 with KOH and agar added at a rate of 1.8 g L − 1 . The appearance of a pellicle under the culture medium after 4 days of incubation indicated the presence of diazotrophic endophytic bacteria. This bacterial film was streaked in Petri dishes containing nitrogen-free solid JMV medium (agar, 15 g L − 1 ) and incubated at 30°C for 5 days until colonies appeared. Isolates with different morphocolonial characteristics in each sample were purified by the streaking technique in Petri dishes containing TSA until pure cultures were obtained. The preservation of the collection was carried out by cryopreservation at -20°C and − 80°C, as suggested by García and Cotter (2016), and Cui et al. ( 2021 ). Genomic DNA extraction Genomic DNA was extracted from bacterial cultures incubated overnight in Tryptone Soy Broth (TSB) (25 mL) at 28°C, shaken at 150 rpm, and the cell pellet was harvested by centrifugation at 13,000 rpm for 3 min (Bach, 2017). The commercial GenElute™ Bacterial Genomic DNA kit (Sigma Aldrich, USA) was used according to the manufacturer's instructions. The DNA concentration was measured in a NanoDrop one spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific, USA) and the quality verified in a 1% agarose gel, using Diamond™ Nucleic Acid Dye (Promega, USA) and visualised in a black light electrophoresis chamber (Cleaver Scientific Ltd., UK). The original DNA was stored at -20°C and − 80°C. Molecular discrimination of Burkholderia Strains belonging to the genus Burkholderia were selected using specific primers recA (Spilker et al. 2009 ). The primers rec A-F (forward) 5’-AGGACGATTCATGGAAGAWAGC-3’ and rec A-R (reverse) 5’-GACGCACYGAYGMRTAGAACTT-3’, amplify a specific sequence of approximately 704 bp of the rec A gene. The polymerase chain reaction was performed in a Biometra thermal cycler (Analytic Jena, Germany). PCR reactions were performed using a 25 µL reaction mix containing 1.0 µL template DNA (50 ng), 12.5 µL KAPA Taq ReadyMix™ (2x) (Sigma-Aldrich, USA) (DNA polymerase, 0.05 units µL − 1 , 3 mM MgCl 2 , 400 µM each dNTP), 1.0 µL of each primer (5 pmol each forward and reverse), and 9.5 µL of PCR grade water (Sigma-Aldrich, USA). The PCR cycle was as follows: initial denaturation at 95°C for 2 minutes, 30 cycles of denaturation for 30 s at 94°C, annealing at 58°C for 30 seconds, an extension for 60 seconds at 72°C, and a final extension at 72°C of 5 min. Two µL of each PCR product was visualized on a 1.0% agarose gel in 0.5X TAE buffer according to Mahenthiralingam et al. ( 2000 ). Positive amplification of the fragment allowed the discrimination of strains of the genus Burkholderia . The PCR products were purified and sequenced by MACROGEN Inc. (South Korea). BOX-PCR genomic profiles: Genomic profiles were obtained by amplifying genomic DNA using the BOX-A1R primer (5'-CTACGGCAAGGCGACGCTGACG-3') (Koeuth et al. 1995 ) in a Biometra Tone thermal cycler (Analytic Jena), following the cycle program described by Arone. et al. (2014). PCR products were separated on a 1.5% agarose gel running at 60 V for 8 hours and then visualised in a black light electrophoresis chamber (Cleaver Scientific Ltd., UK). The DirectLoad™ 1 kb DNA Ladder (Sigma Aldrich, USA) was used as a molecular weight marker. The genomic profiles of the individual strains generated were photographed, digitised, and converted into a binary matrix of the presence or absence of DNA bands. Cluster analysis allowed the construction of dendrograms using the free programme DendroUPGMA ( http://genomes.urv.es/UPGMA/ ) (García-Vallvé et al., 1999), applying the UPGMA algorithm, (Unweighted Pair-Group Method with Arithmetic Mean) (Sneath and Sokal 1962 ), and the Jaccard t coefficient (Jaccard 1912 ), with 2% tolerance. rec A gene phylogeny The rec A sequences obtained were compared with those from GenBank using the BLASTN algorithm (Altschul et al. 1990 ). Sequences of all type strains of the genus Burkholderia sensu stricto were obtained from the NCBI database and aligned using ClustalW (Thompson et al. 1994 ). Phylogenetic trees were reconstructed using a maximum likelihood (ML) approach (Saitou and Nei, 1987 ), using the MEGA X software (Kumar et al. 2018 ). Pairwise distances were calculated using MEGA X (Kumar et al. 2018 ) with the two-parameter Kimura model (Kimura, 1980 ). The topological robustness of the ML tree was inferred by non-parametric bootstrap analysis based on 100 pseudoreplicates. Characterization of growth promotion mechanisms: Standardised inocula of five B. vietnamiensis strains representing each different BOX-PCR group were cultured in TSB broth at 150 rpm and incubated overnight at 28°C, cells were harvested by centrifugation at 13,000 rpm for 3 min (Bach, 2017) and washed at least twice with 0.85% sterile physiological saline. The cell suspension was standardised to an OD600 nm of 1.0 and used to evaluate growth promotion mechanisms. Auxin production: Auxin production was assayed by seeding 200 µL of standardised inoculum in 20 mL of TSB broth supplemented with L-tryptophan as precursor (Gravel et al. 2007 ; Ji et al. 2014 ) at increasing concentrations (0, 50, 100, 200, 400, 600 µg mL-1). Treatments were incubated for 24 h at 26 ± 2°C with shaking at 150 rpm. The supernatant of each treatment was obtained by centrifugation at 8000 rpm for 15 minutes at 4°C. Salkowski's reagent (150 mL of H 2 SO 4 was mixed, 250 mL of distilled water, 7.5 mL of 0.5 M FeCl 3 .6H 2 O solution) was mixed with the supernatant in equal parts (1:1) and left in the dark for 30 minutes. The absorbance of the mixture was then measured at 535 nm in a spectrophotometer (PG Instruments Ltd, UK). The concentration of IAA was estimated from a standard curve. Nitrogen fixation: Asymbiotic nitrogen fixation capacity was tested according to Ríos-Ruiz et al. 2023. The nitrogen fixation capacity was tested in a mineral medium without nitrogen – MM-N (Zapater, 1975 ) (g L-1) - Mannitol, 10.0 g; Sucrose, 10.0 g; K 2 HPO 4 , 0.6551 g; KH 2 PO 4 , 0.15 g; FeCl 3 , 0.0034 g; Na 2 MoO 4 . 2 H 2 O, 0.0108 g; NaCl, 0.02 g; CaCl 2 . 2 H 2 O, 0.01; MgSO 4 . 2H 2 O, 0.2 g; 1.6 g (semi-solid) or 16 g (solid) agar-agar, 0.5 mL bromothymol blue solution (0.5% in 70% ethanol), pH 7.0 ± 0.2. The standardised inocula were seeded on the surface of the semi-solid MM-N at a rate of 10% (150 µL per tube). The formation of a sub-pellicle under the semi-solid MM-N culture medium and the appearance of colonies in the solid MM-N medium, as well as the turning of the bromothymol blue indicator, indicated nitrogen fixation activity. Siderophores production The qualitative production of siderophores by B. vietnamiensis strains was detected on chrome azurol-S (CAS) agar (Schwyn and Neilands, 1987 ). CAS agar consisted of a mixture of a CAS staining solution (solutions 1 and 2) and Succinate medium (SM). For solution 1 (60 mL), 60.5 mg of CAS (Hi-media, India) was dissolved in 50 mL of distilled water (pH 7.0) and then mixed with 10 mL of 1 mM FeCl 3 6 H 2 O (5.4 mg FeCl 3 .6 H 2 O) dissolved in 10 mM HCl (0.822 mL of 37% HCl and density of 1.19 in 100 mL of distilled water). Using a magnetic stirrer, solution 1 was slowly added to solution 2 (72.84 mg HDMTA (Merck, Germany) dissolved in 40 mL distilled water, pH 7.0). The resulting solution (100 mL) was autoclaved at 121°C for 20 minutes and cooled to 50°C. For the SM culture medium, 720 mL of SM broth was added to 27.45 g of PIPES (Sigma-Aldrich, USA), the pH was reduced to 3.0 and corrected to 6.8 using 30% KOH solution. The final mixture was made up to 810 mL with SM broth and supplemented with 15.0 g of agar-agar, then autoclaved at 121°C for 20 minutes and cooled to 60°C. The CAS agar was completed by mixing 810 mL of SM culture medium and 90 mL of CAS staining solution and then distributing the CAS agar in Petri dishes. Each strain was separately inoculated (20 µL) onto Petri dishes containing CAS agar and incubated at 28 ± 2°C for 72 hours in triplicate. The plates were scored by the colour change from blue to orange, the diameter of the siderophore production halo was evaluated and the efficiency of siderophore production was determined using the formula E%= [(halo diameter - colony diameter)/colony diameter] x 100. Samples were analysed in triplicate. Phosphate solubilization Phosphate solubilisation was evaluated qualitatively according to Ramírez-Bahena et al. ( 2015 ) and quantitatively according to Marra et al. ( 2012 ) and Song et al. ( 2008 ), both performed in agar and National Botanical Research Institute's phosphate (NBRIP) broth, respectively. The NBRIP medium had the following composition: glucose 10 gL-1, Ca 3 (PO 4 ) 2 , 5 g; (NH 4 ) 2 SO 4 , 0.1 g; MgCl 2 .6H 2 O, 5 g; MgSO 4 .7H 2 O, 0.25 g and KCl, 0.2 g (Nautiyal, 1999 ). The pH was adjusted to 7.0 prior to autoclaving. For qualitative assessment, the NBRIP broth was supplemented with 1.5% agar (Hi-media, India), autoclaved and served in Petri dishes. For each strain, 20 µL of standardised inoculum was inoculated in quadruplicate into a Petri dish containing NBRIP agar. The inoculated plates were incubated at 28°C and the solubilization diameter halo (translucent area around the colony) was measured using an electronic vernier after 15 days of incubation. The solubilisation index (SI) = halo diameter (mm)/colony diameter (mm) was determined as proposed by Marra et al. 2012 . For quantitative evaluation, 200 µL of standardised inoculum were inoculated in triplicate into 20 mL of NBRIP broth and incubated at 26 ± 2°C at 150 rpm for 24 h. At the end of this period, the inoculum was discarded. At the end of this period, the supernatant was centrifuged (13,500 rpm for 5 minutes), the pH was measured and the amount of soluble P was quantified using the phosphomolybdate method (Murphey and Riley, 1962). The blank treatment consisted of the NBRIP broth without inoculation and shaking. The strains with phosphate solubilising capacity were those with a soluble P concentration higher than the blank treatment. Antibiosis and antagonism against phytopathogenic fungi: The methods used to study the indirect mechanisms related to the biocontrol of phytopathogenic fungi in rice in five strains of B. vietnamiensis were antagonism and antibiosis, as proposed by Castellano-Hinojosa and Bedmar ( 2017 ) and Ríos-Ruiz et al. ( 2020 ). Several phytopathogenic fungi, i. e. Rhizoctonia solani (RS1), Rhizoctonia oryzae (RO1), Rhizoctonia oryzae-sativae (ROS1), Nakataea sigmoidea (NS1) and Nigrospora oryzae (NO1), were donated by the Plant Disease Diagnostic Centre, Faculty of Agrarian Sciences-Universidad Nacional de Tumbes, and were cultured on potato dextrose agar (PDA). For antagonism assays, fungi were first grown in PDA medium and used to take 1 cm diameter agar plugs, which were placed in the centre of plates containing PDA medium that had previously been independently inoculated with 100 µL of each of the strains grown in TSB. The cells were incubated for 72 hours at 25°C and the diameter of the inhibition zones was recorded after 7 days. The percentage of inhibition was calculated using the formula: % inhibition = [(R1-R2/R1) x 100, where R1 is the diameter of the fungal mycelium in plates not inoculated with the bacterial culture and R2 is the diameter of the fungal mycelium in plates inoculated with the bacterial culture. For the antibiosis test, the agar plugs containing the fungus were placed in the centre of a plate containing PDA medium, with the strains to be inoculated in the three equidistant quadrants of the plate at a rate of 20 µL for each strain. The inhibitory effect on fungal growth was evaluated after 7 days at 25°C and the percentage of inhibition relative to the control (without bacteria) was evaluated as indicated above. Both assays were performed in triplicate and incubated for 48 h at 25°C. Evaluation of growth promotion in two rice cultivars: For the standardisation of inocula, the methodologies proposed by Granada et al. ( 2014 ) for germination and vigour index assays and by Wallner et al. ( 2023 ) for growth promotion assays were applied. B. vietnamiensis strains were cultured in 3 mL of TSB and incubated at 28°C for 24 h at 170 rpm. The fermented broth was centrifuged at 10,000 rpm for 10 minutes at 4°C to harvest the cells. The cell pellet was washed at least twice with sterile 10 mM MgSO 4 solution at 10,000 rpm for 5 minutes. The cell suspension was adjusted to an OD 600 nm of 0.001 (approximately 2 x 10 6 CFU mL-1) for the germination and vigour index assays and to an OD 600 nm of 1.0 (approximately 5 x 10 9 CFU mL-1) for the growth promotion assay. Finally, the cell count was verified by the drop method in Petri dishes containing TSA agar (Ferreira et al. 2024 ). The rice varieties used were INIA-510, La Conquista (LC) and INIA 507, La Esperanza (LE), both from the National Rice Programme, El Porvenir-San Martín Experimental Station of the Instituto Nacional de Innovación Agraria (INIA). For the trials, seeds of both varieties were surface disinfected according to the methodology proposed by Ji et al. ( 2014 ): seeds were immersed in a 5% NaOCl solution for 8 min, rinsed three times with sterile distilled water, immersed once in a 70% ethanol solution and finally rinsed six times with sterile distilled water. Germination test and vigour index To evaluate the germination percentage and the vigour index, a completely randomized experimental design was used, with a factorial arrangement of seven treatments for two rice varieties (LC and LE) and with five replicates of ten seeds each. The inoculated treatments consisted of five strains of B. vietnamiensis (T1 to T5), a treatment inoculated with the control strain Priestia megaterium SMBH14-02 (Ríos-Ruiz et al. 2023) and a blank treatment. Fifty disinfected seeds were placed in a sterile tube (50 mL) and inoculated by immersion with 25 mL of standardised inoculum per strain and 25 mL of 10 mM MgSO 4 solution for the blank treatment. The treatments were incubated for two hours at room temperature under the same conditions. The inoculated seeds were sown on absorbent paper at the bottom of Magenta® boxes (200 mL) previously sterilised at 121°C for 30 minutes and moistened with 4 mL of sterile distilled water. The treatments were incubated in the dark at 25 ± 1°C for 10 days and the following parameters were evaluated: plumule length (cm), root length (cm), germination percentage (%) and vigour index using the formula. (Length of aerial part + Length of radicle) * germination (%) Growth promotion evaluation To evaluate growth promotion, a completely randomized experimental design was used, with a factorial arrangement of seven treatments for two rice varieties (LC and LE) and with ten replicates each. The inoculated treatments consisted of five strains of B. vietnamiensis (T1 to T5), a treatment inoculated with the control strain P. megaterium SMBH14-02 (Ríos-Ruiz et al. 2023) and a blank treatment. The disinfected seeds were placed in Petri dishes (15 x 150 mm) containing 1% (w/v) sterile water agar and germinated, at 25 ± 1°C for 3 days in the dark until 1 cm radicles were obtained. The germinated seeds were sown in previously disinfected polypropylene pots (9 x 9 cm, 250 mL) with 85 g of fertilised and sterilized greenhouse substrate (Klasmann TS 1®, Lithuania) irrigated with 55 mL of sterile water distilled to reach a capacity of 60% field. Inoculation was carried out at a rate of 1 mL of standardised inoculum per seed and 1 mL of 10 mM MgSO 4 solution for the blank treatment. The treatments were watered at least twice a week with 50% Hoagland nutrient solution supplemented with 1% KNO 3 to 60% field capacity through an irrigation tube installed in each pot. The seedlings were maintained under controlled conditions (80% humidity at 28°C, 16 h light: 8 h dark) and after 21 days the following parameters were evaluated: Height (cm), root length (cm), Shoot Dry Weight (SDW) (mg), Root Dry Weight (RDW) (mg), leaf and root nitrogen content (%). Statistical analyses Normality and homoscedasticity of the data were tested. Significant differences between strains and their effects on the growth promotion mechanisms in two rice varieties were studied using an analysis of variance (ANOVA) using the R command package in R studio desktop version 1.3.1093. The Tukey test was used with a significance level of 95% (P ≤ 0.05) when parametric data were available, otherwise the Kruskal-Walli test was used with a significance level of 95% (P ≤ 0.05). Correlations between variables were estimated using Pearson's correlation. The difference in germination rate between the two cultivars was tested with a two-tailed t-test, and the difference in germination rate for each cultivar, whether inoculated with inocula or with MgSO 4 solution, was tested with the empirical rule, where 99.7% of the values are within three standard deviations of the mean. Results I so lation and characterization of strains We collected 132 root samples from cultivated rice varieties in the four rice valleys of Bajo Mayo (30), Alto Mayo (57), Huallaga Central (15) and Alto Huallaga (30) (Table 01). We isolated 211 Gram-negative bacterial isolates from the surface-sterilised roots; however, only 78 strains (36% of the total) showed nitrogen-fixing ability in our tests. As we were focusing on B. vietnamiensis , a nitrogen-fixing species, we only kept these isolated for further analysis. Most (44, 57.90%) of these Gram-negative and diazotrophic isolates came from plants grown in the Huallaga Central Valley, while only 6 came from plants grown in the Alto Mayo Valley. Molecular discrimination of Burkholderia Only 4 isolates (5.13%) from our collection of Gram-negative and nitrogen-fixing bacteria, together with two previously isolated strains of B. vietnamiensis la3c3 and la1a4 (Ríos-Ruiz et al. 2020), amplified a fragment of 704 bp corresponding to the rec A gene using primers specific to Burkholderia . Sequencing of the rec A gene confirmed the taxonomic identity of the isolates in the species B. vietnamiensis . These 4 isolates all originated from the Alto Huallaga valley, and more specifically from the Nueva Esperanza sector of the Uchiza district. The la3c3 and la1a4 strains were originally sampled from the Central Huallaga valley (Ríos-Ruiz et al. 2020) BOX-PCR genomic profiling To study the intraspecific diversity of the six B. vietnamiensis strains, genomic DNA profiles were performed using BOX-PCR analysis. The fragments obtained ranged from 500 to 10,000 bp. Using a similarity level of 90% as a cut-off point, 5 different groups were obtained (Figure 01). These groups were named from G1 (BOX group 1) to G5 (BOX group 5). Each group, except G1, contains only one isolate. The strains la3c3 and la1a4 fall into two different BOX-PCR groups. Based on the BOX-PCR dendrogram, one strain per group was selected for amplification, sequencing and phylogenetic study of the rec A gene. Table 1. Geographical location of rices collections and distribution of diazotrophic Gram-negative strains isolated from surface sterilized roots from rice varieties from rice valleys in the San Martin Region Valley Province District/Sector Rice Cultivar Geographical coordinates Amount of samples Number and code of diazotrophic Gram-negative strains Bajo Mayo Lamas Cacatachi/Rosanaico La Conquista 6° 28' 11" S, 76° 26' 26" W; 299 m.a.s.l. 30 (3)-B1; B3; B13 San Martín Juan Guerra/Estación El Porvenir La Conquista, Valor, La Esperanza, Fedearroz 60 6° 35' 49" S, 76° 19' 32" W; 309 m.a.s.l. (4)-B34; B37; B48; B49 Alto Mayo Rioja Awajun/San Francisco de Amayo Valor, La Esperanza, La Victoria 5° 46' 43" S, 77° 18' 29" W; 916 m.a.s.l. 36 (3)-B51; B52; B74 Moyobamba Moyobamba/La conquista Valor 5° 52' 41" S, 77° 10' 10" W; 913 m.a.s.l. 21 (3)-B61; B89; B90 Huallaga Central Bellavista Bellavista/El Porvenir Ferón 7° 03' 11" S, 76° 33' 54" W; 235 m.a.s.l. 15 (9)-B91; B92; B94; B102; B103; B104; B105; B106; B106a Bellavista San Rafael/Carhuapoma La Esperanza 7° 00' 21" S, 76° 30' 08" W; 228 m.a.s.l. (9)-B126; B129; B130; B131; B135; B138; B139; B140; B142 Picota Picota/Santa Rocillo -(E) Valor 6° 55' 32" S, 76° 22' 23" W; 218 m.a.s.l. (21)-B107; B108; B109; B110; B111; B113; B114; B115; B118; B119; B121; B122; B124; B154; B155a; B158; B159; B160; B161; B162; B163 Picota San Hilarión/San Hilarión Ferón 6° 59' 55" S, 76° 27' 05" W; 225 m.a.s.l. (5)-B145; B146; B147; B151; B152 Alto Huallaga Tocache Uchiza/Nueva Esperanza El Valor 8° 15' 39" S, 76° 33' 59" W, 495 m.a.s.l. 15 (7)-B167; B168a; B168b; B169a; B169b; B171a; B172a Uchiza/San Juan de Porongo El Valor, Ferón 8° 23' 27" S, 76° 17' 17" W, 625 m.a.s.l. (10)-B172b; B175; B176; B177; B178; B188; B189; B190; B191; B192 Tocache/San Miguel del Porvenir Ferón, Valor 8° 16' 26" S, 76° 32' 25" W; 590 m.a.s.l. 15 (4)-B193; B195; B196; B201 Phylogeny of the rec A gene: Sequencing resulted in partial rec A sequences of 625-667 bp. Based on blast and phylogenetic analyses, they confirmed that the 5 isolates representing the BOX-PCR groups belonged to the species B. vietnamiensis , with percentages of similarity of the rec A gene between 98.36 and 99.51% with the type strain of B. vietnamiensis LMG 10929 T . The maximum likelihood (ML) phylogenetic tree including sequences of the type strain of the genus Burkholderia sensu stricto is shown in Figure 03. All B. vietnamiensis sequences clustered in the same highly supported (99%BP) clade. The rec A gene sequences have been deposited in GenBank under the following accession numbers OQ706314-OQ706318. Figure 01. Fingerprinting dendrogram of similarity based on the BOX-PCR profiles of the isolates of this study, using the UPGMA algorithm and the Jaccard coefficient with 2% tolerance using the online dendrogram construction utility DendroUPGMA (http:// genomes.urv.es/UPGMA/) (Garcia-Vallvé et al. 1999). Growth promotion mechanisms detected in Burkholderia vietnamiensis All the strains studied were able to express the direct mechanisms of growth promotion, auxin and siderophore production, phosphate solubilisation and diazotrophic capacity in free life (Table 02), as well as the capacity for antibiosis and antagonism against phytopathogenic rice fungi as indirect growth promotion mechanisms (Table 03). All strains were able to produce auxin in the basal TSB medium (0 µg mL -1 ) and in the TSB media supplemented with tryptophan (100 ppm to 600 ppm). There was also a strong positive correlation between auxin production and tryptophan supplementation in TSB broth (r 2 = 0.99). Under all conditions, B. vietnamiensis strain B169b produced a significantly higher amount of auxin compared to the other strains. Figure 02. Maximum-Likelihood phylogenetic tree based on recA gene sequences (650 positions) showing the relationships among phytobeneficial Burkholderia isolated in this study and closely related species of the genus Burkholderia sensu stricto. The significance of each branch is indicated by a bootstrap value (as percentage) calculated for 1000 subsets (only values greater than 50 % are indicated). Bar, 5 substitution per 100 nucleotide positions. The recA sequence of Bradyrhizobium vignae 7-2 T was used as outgroup. Table 02. Direct growth promotion mechanisms evaluated in five endophytic Burkholderia vietnamiensis strains isolated from rice roots Strains Auxins production (µg mL -1 ) Siderophores production Phosphate solubilization Free-living nitrogen fixation 0 ppm 100 ppm 200 ppm 400 ppm 600 ppm EPS (%) qualitative quantitative Solubilization Index Solubilization Efficiency pH Solubilized P (mg PO 4 mL -1 ) la1a4 8.10 (±0.15) B 8.86 (±0.21) B 8.72 (±0.16) B 11.79 (±0.35) A 10.97 (±0.20) B 93.38 (±1.85) B 2.63 (±0.04) A 162.73 (±3.54) A 3.89 11.62 (±0.22) A + la3c3 0.25 (±0.25) D 0.70 (±0.03) D 0.15 (±0.08) D 1.27 (±0.10) C 2.76 (±0.05) D 52.32 (±1.18) D 2.64 (±0.03) A 163.88 (±3.46) A 3.93 12.18 (±0.77) A + B169b 9.08 (±0.07) A 9.70 (±0.17) A 13.98 (±0.31) A 11.76 (±0.07) A 13.90 (±0.22) A 139.52 (±3.30) A 2.58 (±0.04) A 157.80 (±4.33) A 3.81 15.99 (±0.58) A + B168a 0.10 (±0.05) D 1.89 (±0.09) C 1.41 (±0.05) C 3.79 (±0.10) B 4.60 (±0.44) C 72.3 (±11.91) C 2.59 (±0.04) A 159.31 (±3.66) A 3.84 15.26 (±0.28) A + B171a 2.82 (±0.05) C 1.41 (±0.05) C 0.62 (±0.03) D 3.30 (±0.07) B 3.33 (±0.38) B 47.72 (±1.87) DE 2.53 (±0.01) A 153.25 (±0.69) A 3.69 17.63 (±0.48) A + C.V (%) 5.94 5.01 5.68 4.76 7.09 10.03 2.65 4.24 -- 19.30 -- Values followed by different letters indicate significant differences. Tukey test, p = 0.05. All strains were efficient in the production of siderophores, forming orange halos around the bacterial colonies of smaller or larger diameter depending on the strain (Figure 03), highlighting B. vietnamiensis strain B169b as significantly the most efficient strain (139.52%). Regarding phosphate solubilisation, all strains were able to solubilise tricalcium phosphate from NBRIP agar, as evidenced by the appearance of a transparent halo around the bacterial colonies. This activity is reflected in the solubilisation indices and the solubilisation efficiency obtained, although no statistically significant differences were observed between them. The strains also showed no statistically significant differences in the concentration of phosphate released into the culture medium. A negative correlation was observed between the final pH of the culture medium and the difference in soluble phosphate in the culture medium with the white treatment (r 2 = -0.92). Finally, all strains were able to form a subfilm in the semi-solid JMV medium and to grow on the JMV agar, both nitrogen-free, indirectly demonstrating their ability to fix atmospheric nitrogen. Figure 03. Production of siderophores by Burkholderia vietnamiensis B168a on CAS agar Antagonism and antibiosis capacity of B. vietnamiensis strains . In terms of antibiosis capacity, all strains inhibited the growth of the five phytopathogenic fungi, but strain la3c3 showed the greatest antibiosis activity, inhibiting 100% of the growth of R. solani, R. oryzae, N. oryzae and N. sigmoidea . All five strains were able to inhibit 100% of the growth of N. oryzae , the most susceptible phytopathogenic fungus, while the least susceptible was Rhizoctonia oryzae-sativae , with radial growth inhibition ranging from 76.47% (la1a4) to 86.04% (B171a) (Table 03 and Figure 04). Table 03. Antibiosis and antagonism of five strains of Burkholderia vietnamiensis on five species of rice phytopathogenic fungi. Strains Rhizoctonia solani (RS1) Rhizoctonia oryzae (RO1) Rhizoctonia oryzae-sativae (ROS1) Nigrospora oryzae (NO1) Nakataea sigmoidea (NS1) ANTIBIOTIC (%) B168a 78.59 (±0.12) C 100.00 (±0.00) A 82.23 (±1.94) AB 100.00 (±0.00) A 100.00 (±0.00) A B171a 100.00 (±0.00) A 100.00 (±0.00) A 86.04 (±0.35) A 100.00 (±0.00) A 90.86 (±0.24) B B169b 100.00 (±0.00) A 77.93 (±2.04) B 79.72 (±1.53) BC 100.00 (±0.00) A 87.80 (±0.50) C la3c3 100.00 (±0.00) A 100.00 (±0.00) A 84.82 (±0.69) A 100.00 (±0.00) A 100.00 (±0.00) A la1a4 80.39 (±0.61) B 75.80 (±3.49) B 76.47 (±0.80) C 100.00 (±0.00) A 100.00 (±0.00) A C.V(%) 0.39 3.45 2.56 0 0.45 ANTAGONISM (%) B168a 56.22 (±2.60) A 59.03 (±2.36) A 73.85 (±5.87) A 41.98 (±1.92) A 73.63 (±1.46) A B171a 61.20 (±2.64) A 57.54 (±1.47) A 54.39 (±5.27) B 44.96 (±1.20) A 72.79 (±2.00) A B169b 58.71 (±1.00) A 55.06 (±2.27) A 65.87 (±2.89) AB 47.50 (±3.07) A 77.56 (±1.45) A la3c3 64.68 (±2.13) A 61.51 (±0.99) A 64.87 (±2.00) AB 44.72 (±1.61) A 59.94 (±0.92) B la1a4 56.22 (±1.42) A 57.54 (±0.99) A 61.87 (±2.40) AB 49.21 (±3.17) A 63.75 (±2.73) B C.V(%) 8.52 7.26 15.3 12.5 6.4 Values followed by different letters indicate significant differences. Tukey test, p = 0.05. All strains inhibited the growth of the five phytopathogenic fungi, with strain B169b showing the highest range of antagonistic capacity against the five phytopathogenic fungi. The most susceptible fungus was N. sigmoidea with a range of 59.94% (la3c3) to 77.56% (B169b) antagonism and the least susceptible was N. oryzae with a range of 41.98% (B168a) to 49.21% (la1a4) growth inhibition. (Table 03 and Figure 04). All B. vietnamiensis strains increased length, germination and vigour index in both rice cultivars under gnotobiotic conditions, although there was no clear significant difference among isolates. While there were significant differences between the strains for root length in the LE cultivar, we found none for LC. The same result was observed for the length of aerial parts. The highest growth promotion effects compared to the uninoculated reached 50% and 35.6% for root length (LE/B169b and LC/lac3c, respectively) and 32.2% and 33.4% for shoot length (LE/B168a and LC/B168a, respectively). All inoculation conditions resulted in a significant increase in the total length or vigour index of the plant, irrespective of the cultivar, but with no significant difference between the cultivars. (Table 04). While the germination rate differed between the two varieties (p<0.04), the effects of inoculation on this rate were highly significant compared to the uninoculated conditions (p<0.003), with a higher germination rate for inoculated seeds. Figure 04 . Evaluation of antagonism (A) and antibiosis (B) in five strains of Burkholderia vietnamiensis against five strains of phytopathogenic rice fungi, RS1 ( Rhizoctonia solani ), ROS1 ( Rhizoctonia oryzae-sativae ), RO1 ( Rhizoctonia oryzae ), NS1 ( Nakataea sigmoidea ) and NO1 ( Nigrospora oryzae ) Table 04. Evaluation of the vigor index of two rice varieties inoculated with five strains of Burkholderia vietnamiensis grown under gnotobiotic conditions. Strains RL SL TL Germination Vigor Index LE 1 LC 1 LE 1 LC 1 LE 1 LC 1 LE LC LE 1 LC 1 la1a4 58.63 (±1.42) DE 60.41 (±0.92) A 38.16 (±1.42) C 45.36 (±1.09) A 94.40 (±2.57) B 105.77 (±1.71) A 98 98 8582.06 (±199.35) B b 10365.66 (±194.20) A a la3c3 68.13 (±1.02) C 60.52 (±2.19) A 44.97 (±0.94) AB 44.73 (±2.25) A 112.71 (±2.02) A 105.25 (±3.54) A 100 94 11310.27 (±193.25) A a 9892.84 (±414.10) A b B169b 75.27 (±1.97) A 58.74 (±1.88) A 44.22 (±1.23) B 44.20 (±1.46) A 115.18 (±2.79) A 102.94 (±3.18) A 96 94 11470.50 (±305.63) A a 9675.80 (±308.90) A b B168a 65.22 (±1.62) CD 58.79 (±1.52) A 49.75 (±1.33) A 45.62 (±2.20) A 111.12 (±2.01) A 104.41 (±4.09) A 100 96 11496.67 (±294.38) A a 10023.49 (±355.84) A b B171a 72.8 (±1.80) B 57.89 (±1.43) A 43.47 (±0.96) B 42.65 (±1.40) A 112.08 (±2.26) A 100.54 (±2.49) A 100 94 11626.93 (±272.51) A a 9450.57 (±264.82) A b Priestia megaterium SMBH14-02 67.81 (±0.82) CD 60.68 (±1.31) A 42.28 (±0.91) BC 40.36 (±1.10) AB 108.21 (±1.60) A 101.04 (±2.16) A 100 100 11008.73 (±172.29) A a 10103.97 (±236.04) A b Non-inoculated control 49.97 (±1.11) E 44.63 (±1.19) B 37.61 (±0.70) DE 34.19 (±1.22) B 88.32 (±1.59) B 78.82 (±2.01) B 92 84 8235.35 (±176.77) B a 6620.43 (±201.69) B b CV (%) 12.13 14.73 14.83 20.63 11.17 15.76 12.31 16.94 Values followed by different uppercase letters indicate significant differences between strains, and values followed by different lowercase superscript letters indicate significant differences between cultivars. RL: Root length; SL: Aerial part length; TL: Total length of the plant; LE: INIA 507 “La Esperanza” rice cultivar; LC: INIA 510 "La Conquista" rice cultivar 1 Kruskal Wallis test, p = 0.05. Table 05. Evaluation of growth promotion of two rice varieties inoculated with five strains of Burkholderia vietnamiensis grown for 21 days under gnotobiotic conditions. Parameter Burkholderia vietnamiensis Priestia megaterium SMBH14-02 Non-inoculated control CV (%) la1a4 la3c3 B169b B168a B171a RL-LE 2 mm. 103.89 (±3.22) B 103.90 (±5.02) B 115.78 (±5.15) B 142.04 (±1.90) A 116.04 (±2.98) B 106.10 (±7.64) B 97.51 (±2.98) B 13.28 RL-LC 2 73.94 (±4.94) AB 77.36 (±4.83) AB 79.68 (±3.04) A 82.93 (±3.00) A 88.55 (±2.14) A 81.77 (±1.64) A 63.86 (±3.10) B 13.90 SL-LE 2 167.64 (±2.59) B 192.27 (±3.76) A 175.77 (±4.91) AB 121.85 (±2.72) C 169.79 (±4.50) B 172.00 (±7.61) B 159.81 (±2.68) B 8.47 SL-LC 1 196.73 (±5.44) AB 201.12 (±7.77) AB 195.07 (±3.84) AB 211.53 (±4.89) A 199.70 (±3.27) AB 205.49 (±5.23) AB 180.50 (±9.57) B 9.67 TL-LE 1 268.29 (±3.42) ABC a 285.26 (±5.30) Ab a 288.06 (±8.96) A a 258.98 (±4.28) BC b 281.65 (±5.50) A a 263.82 (±8.74) ABC b 251.13 (±4.81) C a 7.22 TL-LC 2 275.69 (±8.02) A a 281.12 (±10.43) A a 265.25 (±5.17) A b 289.96 (±8.96) A a 284.90 (±4.73) A a 290.04 (±4.63) A a 232.43 (±13.65) B a 9.41 RDW-LE 2 mg 11.27 (±0.18) A 11.35 (±0.29) A 11.28 (±0.40) AB 11.25 (±6.05) A 11.57 (±0.20) A 9.81 (±0.27) B 9.31 (±0.18) B 7.84 RDW-LC 1 10.58 (±0.32) A 9.98 (±0.30) ABC 10.01 (±0.27) ABC 10.56 (±0.19) AB 11.21 (±0.26) A 9.69 (±0.47) BC 8.77 (±0.20) C 9.36 SDW-LE 2 16.85 (±0.61) AB 17.55 (±0.34) AB 17.69 (±0.60) AB 16.47 (±0.81) B 19.20 (±0.64) A 13.37 (±0.48) C 13.39 (±0.35) C 11.01 SDW-LC 1 14.79 (±0.54) AB 13.95 (±0.91) ABC 14.36 (±0.41) ABC 13.78 (±0.34) ABC 16.47 (±0.75) A 12.60 (±0.49) BC 11.68 (±0.86) C 14.76 TDW-LE 2 27.85 (±0.68) A a 28.61 (±0.50) A a 28.78 (±1.04) A a 27.47 (±0.90) A a 30.49 (±2.54) A a 22.47 (±0.75) B a 23.05 (±0.49) B a 8.91 TDW-LC 1 24.62 (±0.43) AB b 22.16 (±0.61) BC b 23.44 (±0.43) AB a 24.72 (±0.72) AB b 26.20 (±1.01) A b 22.73 (±0.62) BC a 20.44 (±0.59) C b 8.84 % NPA-LE % 4.91 5.67 4.21 4.64 4.76 4.56 4.29 --- %NPA-LC 4.63 4.87 5.03 4.06 6.24 4.39 4.18 --- % NPR-LE 1.80 1.29 1.39 1.31 1.76 1.34 1.05 --- % NPR-LC 1.54 1.31 1.44 1.78 0.93 1.25 1.54 --- %NT-LE 6.70 6.96 5.60 5.95 6.52 5.90 5.34 --- %NT-LC 6.17 6.19 6.46 5.83 7.17 5.64 5.71 --- Values followed by different capital letters indicate significant differences and values followed by different lowercase superscript letters indicate significant differences between cultivars. RL: Root length; SL: Shoot part length; TL: Total length of the plant; RDW: Root dry weight; SDW: Shoot dry weight; TDW: Total dry weight; %NPA: Percentage of nitrogen in the aerial part; %NPR: Percentage of nitrogen in root part; %NT: Percentage of total nitrogen. LE: INIA 507 “La Esperanza” rice cultivar; LC: INIA 510 Cultivate “La Conquista” 1 Tukey test, p = 0.05; 2 Kruskal Wallis test, p = 0.05. Finally, in the 21-day test, there was no significant difference between the strains of B. vietnamiensis with P. megaterium SMBH14-02 for length, dry weight and nitrogen accumulation. Similarly, non-significant differences were observed in the accumulation of TDW inoculated with B. vietnamiensis strains in the LC cultivar. Differences were observed in the accumulation of total nitrogen, which was higher in the LE cultivar inoculated with B. vietnamiensis la3c3 (6.96%) and with B. vietnamiensis B171a (7.17%) in the LC cultivar (Table 05). Discussion Endophytic bacteria are an important part of the phytomicrobiome, not only because they represent a selected fraction of the soil microbiota, but also because of the growth-promoting mechanisms they express in close association with plants, especially in the Poaceae family. There are several reports of bacteria being selected for their endophytic character and also for their diazotrophic capacity in rice cultivation (Ji et al. 2014 ; de Oliveira et al. 2015; Shabanamol et al. 2018 ; Banik et al. 2019 ; Madhaiyan et al. 2021 ; Kuang et al. 2024 ). De Oliveira et al. (2015), in a bioprospecting study of diazotrophic endophytic bacteria in the rice cultivar BRS Tropical, reported that 18% of the isolates obtained were similar to those in the genus Burkholderia , and diverse species of Burkholderia have been repeatedly isolated from healthy rice roots (see Wallner et al. 2023 and refins). In our study, the proportion of Burkholderia was much lower (5.26%) and was isolated only from the rice variety "El valor", grown in the Alto Huallaga valley. It cannot be excluded that the primers used for the detection of Burkholderia missed some isolates and did not amplify them. However, when searching the complete or draft genomes of B. vietnamiensis available in NCBI, we did not find any example of genomes (among the 208 genomes available) where the primers would not have amplified the rec A fragment. This explanation therefore seems unlikely. The low frequency of Burkholderia isolates in our study could also be due to the selection of isolates for which we attempted to amplify a rec A fragment. We focused on isolates that could fix nitrogen because all previous studies and available genomes have shown that B. vietnamiensis strains are free-living nitrogen fixers. This choice may have excluded some other Burkholderia species that are not free-living nitrogen fixers, thus reducing the number of Burkholderia isolates, although several have been shown to act as plant-associated nitrogen fixers (Estrada de los Santos et al. 2001). Finally, the low frequency of B. vietnamiensis isolates in our sampling may simply reflect their low frequency in soil, although this species has been shown to be frequently recovered from rice roots in different geographical locations, and although Burkholderia s. l. is a highly conserved microbial group of the endophytic microbiota in rice, regardless of soil type and cultivar (Samuel et al. 2023 ). Quite surprisingly, the box PCR profiles showed diversity among the different isolates and among the four recovered in this study. One might have expected, or feared, that a very small number of isolates recovered from a single site would end up as a single identical clone, which is not the case, since we detected at least three different profiles (together with the two other strains isolated in a previous study, but from a different site in Peru). The rec A gene, as a reliable phylogenetic marker for assigning taxonomic identity within the genus Burkholderia (Payne et al. 2005 ; Spilker et al. 2009 ; Bach et al. 2017 ; Depoorter et al. 2020 ; Velez et al. 2023 ; Valdez-Nuñez et al. 2024 ), confirmed that the 4 strains we isolated belonged to the species B. vietnamiensis , but showed less diversity than the Box-PCR approach (as expected). In fact, the 3 representative isolates of the 3 groups showed the same rec A sequences, while the other 2 showed 2 nucleotide differences with our isolates. The Box-PCR diversity, with 3 different profiles among the 4 isolates obtained, however suggests that we may indeed have missed some B. vietnamiensis diversity in our sampling and that we should possibly intensify our efforts to recover more isolates. Based on these results and the genetic differences detected between the isolates, we expected some discrepancies in their growth promoting abilities. While several studies have previously demonstrated beneficial effects of B. vietnamiensis on rice growth and possibly protection against pathogens, we investigated whether and how these strains might actually play a role as growth promoters. Among bacterial auxins, indoleacetic acid (IAA) is one of the most studied, influencing root architecture, nutrient uptake and tolerance to abiotic factors. Bacterial IAA concentrations are influenced by intrinsic factors such as strain type, presence of complete biosynthetic pathway genes, or extrinsic factors such as precursor concentration, pH, carbon source, among others (Etesami and Glick, 2024 ). It has been reported that IAA production is common in plant-associated strains of B. vietnamiensis (Govindarajan et al. 2006 ; Xin et al. 2009 ; Estrada et al. 2013 ; de Oliveira et al. 2015; Ríos-Ruiz et al., 2020 ; Shinjo et al. 2020 ; Nguyen et al. 2022 ). Our results showed that there is a wide range of variation in auxin production among our isolates. At 600 ppm L-tryptophan, strain B169b produced 5 times more auxin than strain la3c3 (13.90 vs 2.76 µg mL-1). Most of the auxin found in the rhizosphere is believed to come from the biosynthesis by microorganisms (Kamilova et al. 2006 ). Variations in auxin production between strains present in the rhizosphere can therefore have a major impact on plant development, and, from the point of view of artificial inoculation, our results proved that there is a basis for bacterial selection of the most productive strains. B. vietnamiensis is also characterised by the production of siderophores (Gillis et al. 1995 ; Meyer et al. 1995 ; Conway and Greenberg, 2002 ; Nguyen et al. 2022 ). Among the functions performed by siderophores, biocontrol stands out due to their high affinity for Fe 3+ , which limits their access to phytopathogens and promotes plant growth under iron-limiting conditions (Afzal et al. 2019 ). As for auxin production, we also found large differences in the production of siderophores among the isolates, ranging from 47.72% (B171a) to 139.52% (B169b), leaving as for auxin the possibility of strain selection for their ability to produce highest amount of siderophore that can play a major role in agriculture (Timofeeva et al. 2022 ). Regarding the other two activities, we did not detect significant differences in phosphate solubilisation, although all strains showed qualitative and quantitative evidence of P solubilisation. The ability of B. vietnamiensis to solubilise insoluble phosphates has been widely reported previously (Park et al. 2010 ; Estrada et al. 2013 ; Liu et al. 2022 ; Nguyen et al. 2022 ; Kuang et al. 2024 ). Estrada et al ( 2013 ) reported that B. vietnamiensis isolates from rice achieved solubilisation index values similar to those reported in this study (2.34–2.95). However, while Bashal et al. (2013) suggested a low correlation between halo formation and the ability to solubilise phosphates released in liquid medium, we observed in our study that all strains that formed a solubilisation halo (qualitatively) also solubilised phosphate in liquid medium (quantitatively). Finally, all isolates showed the ability to fix nitrogen as free-living bacteria, but we could not measure this activity precisely and therefore could not estimate significant differences between them. Given these results, we were expected not only an effect of inoculation on plant growth, but also possibly differences between strains for plant phenotypic traits in response at least to auxin production levels differences. The beneficial interaction between B. vietnamiensis and rice has been described previously (Gillis et al. 1995 ; Tran Van et al. 2000; Govindarajan et al. 2008 ; Ríos-Ruiz et al. 2020 ; Shinjo et al. 2020 ; Wallner et al. 2022 ), but with sometimes conflicting results. King et al. ( 2019 ) reported that Nipponbare rice (japonica) plants inoculated with B. vietnamiensis TVV75 (LMG10929 T ) had no significant effect on biomass production compared to the non-inoculated control at 7 and 14 days after inoculation under gnotobiotic conditions. In our study, we found significant differences between the strains and the non-inoculated control evaluated at 10 and 21 days after inoculation. The LE genotype showed significant differences for root and shoot length at 10 days between isolates, but with a weak correlation between the two sets of measurements (r 2 = 0.38), while the LC genotype showed almost no significant differences, but with a higher r 2 value (0.75). The low correlation value for LE resulted in a lack of significant differences between the strains when considering the total length (shoot + aerial), except for isolate la1a4, which is not different from the uninoculated condition, although it was one of the higher auxins and siderophore producers in our tests. Many previous studies have demonstrated the effect of bacterial auxin on plant growth, in terms of height, root length, dry weight shoot and dry weight root, plant nutrient content, chlorophyll content, leaf area and yield (Pal et al. al. 2022), with an effect being concentration dependent (Gholami et al. 2012 ). Quite disappointingly, we did not detect any relation between the level of auxin production of each strain and their impact on either root or shoot length. There was either no significant difference among strain (for variety LC) or no correlation for variety LE. The other putative growth-promoting activities we measured in our isolates do not appear to have an effect on rice growth either. This lack of correlation may be due to the absence of a dose effect, which would be rather surprising given the different production levels. More likely the growing conditions may not have allowed auxin-related effects to be fully expressed. In our study, we chose to place our plants in non-limiting growing conditions, i. e. with a rich growth medium, where Fe or phosphate is not limiting and therefore the capacity of the bacteria to recover these elements does not play a major role. The increase in plant height and biomass is associated with an increase in the expression of in planta genes involved in iron storage, siderophore biosynthesis and nutrient transport (Zhao et al. 2020 ). One exception is related to nitrogen. It has been reported that inoculation of rice with B. vietnamiensis increases the efficient use of mineral nitrogen (Ríos-Ruiz et al. 2020 ; Shinjo et al. 2020 ). Consequently, the five treatments with B. vietnamiensis and the control strain P. megaterium SMBH14-02, inoculated in the two rice varieties and supplemented with mineral nitrogen (KNO3 1%), increased the nitrogen content in the aerial and root parts from 11 to 19% on average. Although nitrogen fixation is an intrinsic capacity of B. vietnamiensis (Gillis et al. 1995 ; Shinjo et al. 2018 ; Bach et al. 2022 ), recent studies have concluded that it would not be the main growth promoting mechanism in rice. Shinjo et al. ( 2020 ) inoculated B. vietnamiensis RS1 into seedlings of rice cultivar Nipponbare (japonica) and concluded that the promotion of root growth occurred through hormonal regulation and increased nitrogen uptake through the overexpression of genes related to the uptake, transport and assimilation of mineral nitrogen. This ability is intrinsic to endophytic Burkholderia , as it improves the acquisition and transport of nutrients in tissues at the transcriptional level (Zhao et al. 2020 ). Finally, with regard to plant genotype, it is well known that plant genotype influences the response to inoculation of specific bacterial strains (Sharma et al. 2014 ; Belimov et al. 2015 ; Ahmed et al. 2021 ). Wallner et al. ( 2022 ) inoculated B. vietnamiensis LMG10929 into two rice cultivars, Nipponbare (japonica) and IR64 (indica); although they observed similar colonisation patterns between the two genotypes, they found that there was a strong influence of rice genotype, particularly in relation to the indica group more than the japonica group. The IR64 (indica) cultivar inoculated with B. vietnamiensis increased the expression of the nitrate transporter NRT1.1B, affecting its capacity for assimilation and uptake of nitrate from the nutrient solution. In our study, the results suggested, once again as in other studies, that selecting bacterial strains for inoculation to improve plant growth can only be done by taking into account the diversity of cultivated varieties, but also by integrating into breeding programmes the ability of varieties to interact with micro-organisms. Inoculation of B. vietnamiensis and protection against pathogens Recently, Wang et al. ( 2023 ), reported that the inoculation of B. vietnamiensis strain B23 in Citrus plants increased the expression of genes related to the use and uptake of nutrients from the rhizosphere and increased antagonistic activities against competing bacteria and fungi, as well as resistance to competitor-derived metabolites. Meng et al. ( 2023 ) reported the isolation of B. vietnamiensis C12 as an antifungal endophyte of the medicinal plant Ficus tikoua and demonstrated the production of siderophores with bactericidal activity, ornibactin C-4 and C-8. Similarly, Wang et al. ( 2022 ) demonstrated the ability of B. vietnamiensis YQ9 to produce hydroxamate type siderophores. All B. vietnamiensis strains in our study showed antagonistic and antibacterial activity against three members of the Rhizoctonia complex, including Rhizoctonia solani , the causal agent of rice downy mildew (Cuong et al. 2011 ; Zhang et al. 2012 ; Sivaji et al. 2016 ; Ríos-Ruiz et al. 2020 ; Meng et al. 2023 ). The antifungal activity of B. vietnamiensis against Nakataea sigmoidea and Nigrospora oryzae , the etiological agents of stem rot (Garrido and Vilela, 2019 ) and panicle branch rot (Liu et al. 2021 ), respectively, is reported for the first time. Meng et al. ( 2023 ) reported the antifungal activity of B. vietnamiensis C12 against several phytopathogenic fungi, reaching 94.78% inhibition against R. solani , a higher range than that reported in our study (56.22 to 64.68%). The authors conclude that this antifungal activity against R. solani is due to the production of several secondary metabolites, highlighting the siderophores ornibactin C4 and C8, the antifungal peptides burkholdin 1097, 1213, 1215 and 1119, and the monoterpenoid phenol carvacrol. Here we show that all B. vietnamiensis strains have a strong effect on reducing fungal growth on artificial media in Petri dishes. Such ability of Burkholderia isolates to directly suppress the growth of phytopathogenic fungi has been described previously and is important (Pal et al. 2022 ). Antifungal metabolites produced by Burkholderia that are effective against the Rhizoctonia complex include pyrrolnitrin, phenazines, 1-phenazine carboxylic acid, volatile indolic compounds (Cartwright et al. 1995 ), siderophores such as ornibactin (Rojas-Rojas et al. 2018 ), some quinolone antibiotics such as hydroxymethyl-alkylquinoline (Saalim et al. 2020 ), and occidiofungins A-D (Lu et al. 2009 ). Searches for these compounds in B. vietnamiensis genomes have detected some of the genes involved in the production of these compounds (such as ornibactin), while others were not detected (such as pyrrolnitrin or occidiofungins A-D). There is still a long way to go to isolate and characterise the antifungal compounds produced by B. vietnamiensis , but we can expect new metabolites to be found. It is also clear that there is a huge gap from Petri dish tests to the use of either live bacteria or metabolites extract in the field to combat rice diseases, but even if Burkholderia s.s. is still a problematic genus for use as a bioinoculant, and B. vietnamiensis species in particular, it remains an extremely interesting and promising genus in the search for solutions and alternative compounds to fight against rice diseases. Conclusions Among the endophytic strains of Burkholderia vietnamiensis there is genetic diversity, as well as a wide metabolic diversity in terms of direct and indirect growth promotion mechanisms in both rice varieties, at the level of aerial biomass and foliar nitrogen accumulation. Although, no significant differences are observed in growth promotion between the inoculated treatments, nor is superiority observed against harmless and beneficial strains, such as P. megaterium . On the other hand, our tests were only conducted at the greenhouse level, so there must be other variables at play at the field level. An important factor is that B. vietnamiensis adapts very well to the endophytic style of rice, which is undoubtedly a great advantage over other strains, so it is necessary to evaluate a balance between benefits and risks, and this opens the door to new studies on the possibility or not of using this strain, which is in the cepacia complex. For future studies, the biosafety involved in the use of these strains should be evaluated, considering the opportunistic pathogenic potential of members of the Burkholderia cepacia complex. To do this, virulence genes associated with pathogenicity must be searched in the genomes of the respective strains. Declarations Author Contribution Conceptualization: R.A.V.N.; J.C.Ch.G., and G.B.; Methodology: R.A.V.N and G.B.; Validation: P.P.M.C. and N.R.A.S.; Formal analysis: R.A.V.N., A.W.O.R, and G.B.; Research: P.P.M.C., N.R.A.S and R.A.V.N.; Resources: R.A.V.N.; Writing-original draft preparation: R.A.V.N. and P.P.M.C.; Writing-review and editing: G.B. and J.C.Ch.G.; Visualization: R.A.V.N.; Supervision: R.A.V.N and G.B.; Funding acquisition: R.A.V.N. and J.C.Ch.G. All the authors read and approved the final manuscript. Acknowledgement The authors thank Edson Torres Chávez, leader of the rice program of the National Institute of Agrarian Innovation (INIA), for providing the rice varieties tested in this study, and they also thank Professor Miguel Garrido Rondoy, research professor at the National University of Tumbes, for donating the strains of phytopathogenic fungi to carry out this study. References Aba-Regis B, Oliveros K, Ibarra-Romero C, Raymundo A, Aggangan N, Zulaybar T, Rosana A (2021) Draft Genome Sequence of the Phosphate-Solubilizing Rhizobacterium Burkholderia pseudomultivorans Strain MPSB1, Isolated from a Copper Mined-Out Site. Microbiol Resour Announc 10:10–1128. https://doi.org/10.1128/mra.01304-20 Adaikpoh B, Fernandez H, Eustáquio A (2022) Biotechnology approaches for natural product discovery, engineering, and production based on Burkholderia bacteria. Curr Opin Biotechnol 77:102782. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copbio.2022.102782 Afzal I, Shinwari Z, Sikandar S, Shahzad S (2019) Plant beneficial endophytic bacteria: Mechanisms, diversity, host range and genetic determinants. Microbiol Res 221:36–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micres.2019.02.001 Ahmed S, Heo T, Roy A, Walitang D, Choi J, Sa T (2021) Accumulation of compatible solutes in rice ( Oryza sativa L.) cultivars by inoculation of endophytic plant growth promoting bacteria to alleviate salt stress. Appl Biol Chem 64:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13765-021-00638-x Alam K, Zhao Y, Lu X, Gong K, Zhong L, Hao J, Islam M, Islam S, Li G, Zhang Y, Li R, Li A (2022) Isolation, complete genome sequencing and in silico genome mining of Burkholderia for secondary metabolites. BMC Microbiol 22:323. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12866-022-02692-x Altschul S, Gish W, Miller W, Myers E, Lipman D (1990) Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol 215:403–410. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-2836(05)80360-2 Arone G, Calderón C, Moreno S, Bedmar E (2014) Identification of Ensifer strains isolated from root nodules of Medicago hispida grown in association with Zea mays in the Quechua region of the Peruvian Andes. Biol Fertil Soils 50:185–190. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-013-0825-3 Bach E, Sant'Anna F, Magrich dos Passos J, Balsanelli E, de Baura V, Pedrosa F, de Souza E, Passaglia L (2017) Detection of misidentifications of species from the Burkholderia cepacia complex and description of a new member, the soil bacterium Burkholderia catarinensis sp. nov. Pathog Dis 75:ftx076. https://doi.org/10.1093/femspd/ftx076 Bach E, Sant'Anna F, dos Santos Seger G, Passaglia L (2022) Pangenome inventory of Burkholderia sensu lato , Burkholderia sensu stricto , and the Burkholderia cepacia complex reveals the uniqueness of Burkholderia catarinensi s. Genomics 114:398–408. https://doi.org/10.1080/1040841X.2021.1946009 Baldani J, Pot B, Kirchhof G, Falsen E, Baldani V, Olivares F, Hoste B, Kersters A, Hartmann A, Gillis M, Döbereiner J (1996) Emended description of Herbaspirillum ; inccusion of [ Pseudomonas ] rubrisubalbicans , a mild plant pathogen, as Herbaspirillum rubrisubalbicans comb. Nov.; and classification of a Group of Clinical Isolates (EF Group 1) as Herbaspirillum species 3. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 46:802–810. https://doi.org/10.1099/00207713-46-3-802 Baldani J, Reis V, Videira S, Boddey L, Baldani V (2014) The art of isolating nitrogen-fixing bacteria from non-leguminous plants using N-free semi-solid media: a practical guide for microbiologists. Plant Soil 384:413–431. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-014-2186-6 Banik A, Dash G, Swain P, Kumar U, Mukhopadhyay S, Dangar T (2019) Application of rice ( Oryza sativa L.) root endophytic diazotrophic Azotobacter sp. strain Avi2 (MCC 3432) can increase rice yield under green house and field condition. Microbiol Res 219:56–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micres.2018.11.004 Bashan Y, Kamnev A, de-Bashan L (2013) Tricalcium phosphate is inappropriate as a universal selection factor for isolating and testing phosphate-solubilizing bacteria that enhance plant growth: a proposal for an alternative procedure. Biol Fertil Soils 49:465–479. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-012-0737-7 Belimov A, Puhalsky I, Safronova V, Shaposhnikov A, Vishnyakova M, Semenova E, Zinovkina N, Makarova N, Wenzel W, Tikhonovich I (2015) Role of plant genotype and soil conditions in symbiotic plant-microbe interactions for adaptation of plants to cadmium-polluted soils. Wat Air Soil Poll 226:1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-015-2537-9 Cartwright D, Chilton W, Benson D (1995) Pyrrolnitrin and phenazine production by Pseudomonas cepacia , strain 5.5B, a biocontrol agent of Rhizoctonia solani . Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 43:211–216. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00172814 Castellano-Hinojosa A, Bedmar E (2017) 14 Methods for Evaluating Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria Traits. Adv PGPR Res 255. https://doi.org/10.1079/9781786390325.0255 Conway B, Greenberg E (2002) Quorum-sensing signals and quorum-sensing genes in Burkholderia vietnamiensis . J Bacteriol 184. https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.184.4.1187-1191.2002 Cui Z, Wang S, Kakar K, Xie G, Li B, Chen G, Zhu B (2021) Genome sequence and adaptation analysis of the human and rice pathogenic strain Burkholderia glumae AU6208. Pathogens 10:87. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens10020087 Cuong N, Nicolaisen M, Sørensen J, Olsson S (2011) Hyphae-colonizing Burkholderia sp.—a new source of biological control agents against sheath blight disease ( Rhizoctonia solani AG1-IA) in rice. Microb Ecol 62:425–434. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-011-9823-x Depoorter E, De Canck E, Peeters C, Wieme A, Zlosnik J, LiPuma J, Coenye T, Vandamme P (2020) Burkholderia cepacia complex taxon K: where to split? Front Microbiol 11:559949. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2020.01594 Depoorter E, Bull M, Peeters C, Coenye T, Vandamme P, Mahenthiralingam E (2016) Burkholderia : an update on taxonomy and biotechnological potential as antibiotic producers. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 100:5215–5229. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-016-7520-x Dobritsa A, Samadpour M (2016) Transfer of eleven species of the genus Burkholderia to the genus Paraburkholderia and proposal of Caballeronia gen. nov. to accommodate twelve species of the genera Burkholderia and Paraburkholderia . Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 66:2836–2846. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijsem.0.001065 Draghi W, Alvarez F, Russo D, Lagares A, Wall L, Zorreguieta A (2021) Root-associated Burkholderia spp. on the hairy vetch ( Vicia villosa Roth.) cover crop vary depending on soil history of use. Rhizosphere 17:100297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rhisph.2020.100297 Eberl L, Vandamme P (2016) Members of the genus Burkholderia : good and bad guys. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.8221.1 . F1000Research Elshafie H, Camele I (2021) An overview of metabolic activity, beneficial and pathogenic aspects of Burkholderia spp. Metabolites 11:21. https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo11050321 Estrada G, Baldani V, de Oliveira D, Urquiaga S, Baldani J (2013) Selection of phosphate-solubilizing diazotrophic Herbaspirillum and Burkholderia strains and their effect on rice crop yield and nutrient uptake. Plant Soil 369:115–129. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-012-1550-7 Estrada-De Los Santos P, Bustillos-Cristales R, Caballero-Mellado J (2001) Burkholderia , a genus rich in plant-associated nitrogen fixers with wide environmental and geographic distribution. Appl Environ Microbiol 67:2790–2798. http://doi:10.1128/AEM.67.6.2790-2798.2001 Estrada-de Los Santos P, Palmer M, Chávez-Ramírez B et al (2018) Whole genome analyses suggests that Burkholderia sensu lato contains two additional novel genera ( Mycetohabitans gen. nov., and Trinickia gen. nov.): implications for the evolution of diazotrophy and nodulation in the Burkholderiaceae . Genes 9: 389. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes9080389 Etesami H, Glick B (2024) Bacterial indole-3-acetic acid: A key regulator for plant growth, plant-microbe interactions, and agricultural adaptive resilience. Microbiol Res 127602. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes9080389 Ferreira E, Nogueira M, Hungria M (2024) Manual de análises de bioinsumos para uso agrícola: inoculantes. Embrapa Fu Y, Yin Z, Yin C (2017) Biotransformation of ginsenoside Rb1 to ginsenoside Rg3 by endophytic bacterium Burkholderia sp. GE 17-7 isolated from Panax ginseng . J Appl Microbiol 122:1579–1585. https://doi.org/10.1111/jam.13435 Fu H, Gan L, Tian Z et al (2022) Rapid detection of Burkholderia cepacia complex carrying the 16S rRNA gene in clinical specimens by recombinase-aided amplification. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 12:984140. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2022.984140 Garcia E, Cotter P (2016) Burkholderia thailandensis : growth and laboratory maintenance. Curr Protoc Microbiol 42:4C–41. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpmc.15 Garcia-Vallvé S, Palau J, Romeu A (1999) Horizontal gene transfer in glycosyl hydrolases inferred from codon usage in Escherichia coli and Bacillus subtilis . Mol Biol Evol 16:1125–1134. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a026203 Garrido M, Vilela N (2019) Capacidad antagónica de Trichoderma harzianum frente a Rhizoctonia , Nakatea sigmoidea y Sclerotium rolfsii y su efecto en cepas nativas de Trichoderma aisladas de cultivos de arroz. Scientia Agropecuaria 10:199–206. http://dx.doi.org/10.17268/sci.agropecu.2019.02.05 Gillis M, Van Van T, Bardin R et al (1995) Polyphasic taxonomy in the genus Burkholderia leading to an emended description of the genus and proposition of Burkholderia vietnamiensis sp. nov. for N2-fixing isolates from rice in Vietnam. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 45:274–289. https://doi.org/10.1099/00207713-45-2-274 Govindarajan M, Balandreau J, Muthukumarasamy R, Revathi G, Lakshminarasimhan C (2006) Improved yield of micropropagated sugarcane following inoculation by endophytic Burkholderia vietnamiensis . Plant Soil 280:239–252. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-005-3223-2 Gholami A, Biyari A, Gholipoor M, Rahmani H (2012) Growth Promotion of Maize ( Zea mays L.) by Plant-Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria under Field Conditions. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal – Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 43:1263–1272. http://10.1080/00103624.2012.666302 Govindarajan M, Balandreau J, Kwon S, Weon H, Lakshminarasimhan C (2008) Effects of the inoculation of Burkholderia vietnamensis and related endophytic diazotrophic bacteria on grain yield of rice. Microb Ecol 55:21–37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-007-92479 Granada C, Arruda L, Lisboa B, Passaglia L, Vargas L (2014) Diversity of native rhizobia isolated in south Brazil and their growth promotion effect on white clover ( Trifolium repens ) and rice ( Oryza sativa ) plants. Biol Fertil Soils 50:123–132. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-013-0840-4 Gravel V, Antoun H, Tweddell R (2007) Effect of indole-acetic acid (IAA) on the development of symptoms caused by Pythium ultimum on tomato plants. Eur J Plant Pathol 119:457–462. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10658-007-9170-4 Jaccard P (1912) The distribution of the flora in the alpine zone. 1 New phytologist 11:37–50 Ji S, Gururani M, Chun S (2014) Isolation and characterization of plant growth promoting endophytic diazotrophic bacteria from Korean rice cultivars. Microbiol Res 169:83–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micres.2013.06.003 Jin Y, Zhou J, Zhou J, Hu M, Zhang Q, Kong N, Ren H, Liang L, Yue J (2020) Genome-based classification of Burkholderia cepacia complex provides new insight into its taxonomic status. Biol Direct 15:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13062-020-02585 Kamilova F, Kravchenko LV, Shaposhnikov AI, Azarova T, Makarova N, Lugtenberg B (2006) Organic acids, sugars, and L-tryptophane in exudates of vegetables growing on stonewool and their effects on activities of rhizosphere bacteria. Mol Plant-Microbe Interact 19:250–256. https://doi.org/10.1094/MPMI-19-0250 Kimura M (1980) A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J Mol Evol 16:111–120. Https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01731581 King E, Wallner A, Rimbault I, Barrachina C, Klonowska A, Moulin L, Czernic P (2019) Monitoring of rice transcriptional responses to contrasted colonizing patterns of phytobeneficial Burkholderia sl reveals a temporal shift in JA systemic response. Front Plant Sci 10:1141. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2019.01141 King E, Wallner A, Guigard L et al (2023) Paraburkholderia phytofirmans PsJN colonization of rice endosphere triggers an atypical transcriptomic response compared to rice native Burkholderia sl endophytes. Sci Rep 13:10696. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-37314-7 Koeuth T, Versalovic J, Lupski J (1995) Differential subsequence conservation of interspersed repetitive Streptococcus pneumoniae BOX elements in diverse bacteria. Genome Res 5:408–418. https://doi:10.1101/gr.5.4.408 Kong P, Richardson P, Hong C (2020) Burkholderia sp . SSG is a broad-spectrum antagonist against plant diseases caused by diverse pathogens. Biol Control 151:104380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2020.104380 Kuang W, Chen W, Lei C et al (2024) Diversity of endophytic bacterial community in rice roots and their roles in phosphate solubilization and plant growth. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rhisph.2024.100877 . Rhizosphere 100877 Kumar S, Stecher G, Li M, Knyaz C, Tamura K (2018) MEGA X: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis across computing platforms. Mol Biol Evol 35:1547. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msy096 Lin Q, Lv Y, Gao Z, Qiu L (2020) Pararobbsia silviterrae gen. nov., sp. nov., isolated from forest soil and reclassification of Burkholderia alpina as Pararobbsia alpina comb. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 70:1412–1420. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijsem.0.003932 Liu M, Philp J, Wang Y et al (2022) Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria Burkholderia vietnamiensis B418 inhibits root-knot nematode on watermelon by modifying the rhizosphere microbial community. Sci Rep 12:8381. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-12472-2 Liu L, Zhao K, Zhao Y, Zhang Y, Fu Q, Huang S (2021) Nigrospora oryzae causing panicle branch rot disease on Oryza sativa (rice). Plant Dis 105:2724. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-11-20-2423-PDN Lopes-Santos L, Castro D, Ferreira-Tonin M, Corrêa D, Weir B, Park D, Mariscal L, Neto J, Destéfano S (2017) Reassessment of the taxonomic position of Burkholderia andropogonis and description of Robbsia andropogonis gen. nov., comb. nov. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 110:727–736. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10482-017-0842-6 Lu S, Novak J, Austin F, Gu G, Ellis D, Kirk M, Wilson-Stanford S, Tonelli M, Smith L (2009) Occidiofungin, a unique antifungal glycopeptide produced by a strain of Burkholderia contaminans . Biochemistry 48:8312–8321. http://doi.org/10.1021/bi900814c de Oliveira Viana T, da Silva Santos J, Manfredi C, de Sousa Moreira R, Baldani V, Ferreira J (2015) Isolation and inoculation of diazotrophic bacteria in rice ( Oryza sativa L.) grown in Vitoria da Conquista-BA. Afr J Agric Res 10:2847–2854. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJAR2014.9282 Nguyen V, Mai D, Chu H, Le T (2022) In vitro screening of siderophore-producing rice root endophytic bacteria from up-land paddies in north-western Vietnam for plant growth-promoting activities. Malays J Microbiol 18. http://doi:10.21161/mjm.211297 Mahenthiralingam E, Bischof J, Byrne S, Radomski C, Davies J, Av-Gay Y, Vandamme P (2000) DNA-based diagnostic approaches for identification of Burkholderia cepacia complex, Burkholderia vietnamiensis , Burkholderia multivorans , Burkholderia stabilis , and Burkholderia cepacia genomovars I and III. J Clin Microbiol 38:3165–3173. https://doi:10.1128/jcm.38.9.3165-3173.2000 Madhaiyan M, Selvakumar G, Alex T, Cai L, Ji L (2021) Plant growth promoting abilities of novel Burkholderia -related genera and their interactions with some economically important tree species. Front Sustain Food Syst 5:618305. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2021.618305 Marra M, Fonsêca S, Soares C, de Oliveira S et al (2012) Biological nitrogen fixation and phosphate solubilization by bacteria isolated from tropical soils. Plant Soil 357:289–307. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-012-1157-z Meng X, Medison R, Cao S, Wang L, Cheng S, Tan L, Sun Z, Zhou Y (2023) Isolation, identification, and biocontrol mechanisms of endophytic Burkholderia vietnamiensis C12 from Ficus tikoua Bur against Rhizoctonia solani . Biol Control 178:105132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2022.105132 Meyer J, Van Van T, Stintzi A, Berge O, Winkelmann G (1995) Ornibactin production and transport properties in strains of Burkholderia vietnamiensis and Burkholderia cepacia (formerly Pseudomonas cepacia). Biometals 8:309–317. http://doi.org/10.1007/BF00141604 Morales-Ruíz L, Rodríguez-Cisneros M, Kerber-DíazJ, Rojas-Rojas FU, Ibarra J, Estrada-de Los Santos P (2022) Burkholderia orbicola sp. nov., a novel species within the Burkholderia cepacia complex. Arch Microbiol 204:178. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00203-022-02778-0 Mullins A, Murray J, Bull M et al (2019) Genome mining identifies cepacin as a plant-protective metabolite of the biopesticidal bacterium Burkholderia ambifaria . Nat Microbiol 4:996–1005. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41564-019-0383-z Murphy J, Riley J (1962) A modified single solution method for the determination of phosphate in natural waters. Anal Chim Acta 27:31–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-2670(00)88444-5 Nautiyal C (1999) An efficient microbiological growth medium for screening phosphate solubilizing microorganisms. FEMS Microbiol Lett 170:265–270. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6968.1999.tb13383.x Pal G, Saxena S, Kumar K et al (2022) Endophytic Burkholderia : Multifunctional roles in plant growth promotion and stress tolerance. Microbiol Res 265:127201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micres.2022.127201 Park K, Lee O, Jung H et al (2010) Rapid solubilization of insoluble phosphate by a novel environmental stress-tolerant Burkholderia vietnamiensis M6 isolated from ginseng rhizospheric soil. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 86:947–955. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micres.2022.127201 Payne G, Vandamme P, Morgan S et al (2005) Development of a recA gene-based identification approach for the entire Burkholderia genus. Appl Environ Microbiol 71:3917–3927. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.71.7.3917-3927.2005 Ramírez-Bahena M, Salazar S, Velázquez E, Laguerre, Peix A (2015) Characterization of phosphate solubilizing rhizobacteria associated with pea ( Pisum sativum L.) isolated from two agricultural soils. Symbiosis 67:33–41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13199-015-0375-6 Rojas-Rojas F, Salazar-Gómez A, Vargas-Díaz et al (2018) Broad-spectrum antimicrobial activity by Burkholderia cenocepacia TAtl-371, a strain isolated from the tomato rhizosphere. Microbiol 164:1072–1086. https://doi.org/10.1099/mic.0.000675 Rios-Ruiz W, Tuanama-Reátegui C, Huamán-Córdova G, Valdez-Nuñez R (2023) Co-Inoculation of endophytes Bacillus siamensis TUR07-02b and Priestia megaterium SMBH14-02 promotes growth in rice with low doses of nitrogen fertilizer. Plants 12:524. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12030524 Ríos-Ruiz W, Torres-Chávez E, Torres-Delgado J, Rojas-García J, Bedmar E, Valdez-Nuñez R (2020) Inoculation of bacterial consortium increases rice yield ( Oryza sativa L.) reducing applications of nitrogen fertilizer in San Martin region, Peru. Rhizosphere 14:100200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rhisph.2020.1002000 Rojas-Rojas F, López-Sánchez D, Meza-Radilla G, Méndez-Canarios A, Ibarra J, Estrada-de los Santos P (2019) El controvertido complejo Burkholderia cepacia , un grupo de especies promotoras del crecimiento vegetal y patógenas de plantas, animales y humanos. Rev Argent Microbiol 51:84–92. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ram.2018.01.002 Romero-Gutiérrez K, Dourado M, Garrido L, Olchanheski L, Mano E, Dini-Andreote F, Valvano M, Araújo W (2020) Phenotypic traits of Burkholderia spp. associated with ecological adaptation and plant-host interaction. Microbiol Res 236:126451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micres.2020.126451 Saitou N, Nei M (1987) The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 4:406–425. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040454 Saalim M, Villegas-Moreno J, Clark B (2020) Bacterial alkyl-4-quinolones: Discovery, structural diversity and biological properties. Molecules 25:5689. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25235689 Samuel S, Suzuki K, Asiloglu R, Harada N (2023) Rice endophytic communities are strongly dependent on microbial communities specific to each soil. Biol Fertil Soils 59:733–746. http://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-023-01743-3 Sawana A, Adeolu M, Gupta R (2014) Molecular signatures and phylogenomic analysis of the genus Burkholderia : proposal for division of this genus into the emended genus Burkholderia containing pathogenic organisms and a new genus Paraburkholderia gen. nov. harboring environmental species. Front Genet 5:119458. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2014.00429 Schwyn B, Neilands J (1987) Universal chemical assay for the detection and determination of siderophores. Anal Biochem 160:47–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-2697(87)90612-9 Shabanamol S, Divya K, George T, Rishad K, Sreekumar T, Jisha M (2018) Characterization and in planta nitrogen fixation of plant growth promoting endophytic diazotrophic Lysinibacillus sphaericus isolated from rice ( Oryza sativa ). Physiol Mol Plant Pathol 102:46–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmpp.2017.11.003 Sharma A, Shankhdhar D, Shankhdhar S (2014) Growth promotion of the rice genotypes by PGPRs isolated from rice rhizosphere. J Soil Sci Plant Nutr 14:505–517. http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-95162014005000040 Shinjo R, Uesaka K, Ihara K, Sakazaki S, Yano K, Kondo M, Tanaka A (2018) Draft genome sequence of Burkholderia vietnamiensis strain RS1, a nitrogen-fixing endophyte isolated from sweet potato. Microbiol Resour Announc 7:10–1128. https://doi.org/10.1128/mra.00820-18 Shinjo R, Tanaka A, Sugiura D et al (2020) Comprehensive analysis of the mechanisms underlying enhanced growth and root N acquisition in rice by the endophytic diazotroph, Burkholderia vietnamiensis RS1. Plant Soil 450:537–555. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-020-04506-3 Sivaji M, Vinoth R, Tamilkumar P, Kumar S, Chandrasekar A, Syamala M (2016) Isolation and characterization of plant growth promoting Burkholderia spp. Int J Plant Prot 9:223–229. http://DOI:10.15740/HAS/IJPP/9.1/223-229 da Silva Araújo A, Baldani V, de Souza Galisa P, Pereira J, Baldani J (2013) Response of traditional upland rice varieties to inoculation with selected diazotrophic bacteria isolated from rice cropped at the Northeast region of Brazil. Appl Soil Ecol 64:49–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2012.10.004 Sneath P, Sokal R (1962) Numerical taxonomy. Nature 193:855–860 Spilker T, Baldwin A, Bumford A, Dowson C, Mahenthiralingam E, LiPuma J (2009) Expanded multilocus sequence typing for Burkholderia species. J Clin Microbiol 47:2607–2610. https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.00770-09 Song O, Lee S, Lee Y, Lee S, Kim K, Choi Y (2008) Solubilization of insoluble inorganic phosphate by Burkholderia cepacia DA23 isolated from cultivated soil. Braz J Microbiol 39:151–156. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1517-83822008000100030 Sun L, Qiu F, Zhang X, Dai X, Dong X, Song W (2008) Endophytic bacterial diversity in rice ( Oryza sativa L.) roots estimated by 16S rDNA sequence analysis. Microb Ecol 55:415–424. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-007-9287-1 Trân Van V, Berge O, Ngô Kê S, Balandreau J, Heulin T (2000) Repeated beneficial effects of rice inoculation with a strain of Burkholderia vietnamiensis on early and late yield components in low fertility sulphate acid soils of Vietnam. Plant Soil 218:273–284. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014986916913 Thompson J, Higgins D, Gibson T (1994) CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res 22:4673–4680. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/22.22.4673 Timofeeva A, Galyamova M, Sedykh S (2022) Bacterial Siderophores: Classification, Biosynthesis, Perspectives of Use in Agriculture. Plants 11:3065. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11223065 Valdez-Nuñez R, Ríos-Ruiz W, Ormeño-Orrillo E, Torres-Chávez E, Torres-Delgado J (2020) Genetic characterization of rice endophytic bacteria ( Oryza sativa L.) with antimicrobial activity against Burkholderia glumae . Rev argent microbiol 52:315–327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ram.2019.12.002 Valdez-Nuñez R, Ramos-Luna L, Meza-Catalán P, Asencios-Sifuentes N, Ocaña-Rodriguez A, Chavez-Galarza J, Sandoval-Vergara A, Bena G (2024) Genetic diversity and virulence of phytopathogenic Burkholderia glumae strains isolated from rice cultivars in valleys of the high jungle of Peru. Plant Disease, (ja). https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-09-23-1823-RE Velez L, Aburjaile F, Farias A et al (2023) Burkholderia semiarida sp. nov. and Burkholderia sola sp. nov., two novel B. cepacia complex species causing onion sour skin. Syst Appl Microbiol 46:126415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.syapm.2023.126415 Wallner A, Busset N, Lachat J et al (2022) Differential Genetic Strategies of Burkholderia vietnamiensis and Paraburkholderia kururiensis for Root Colonization of Oryza sativa subsp. japonica and O. sativa subsp. indica, as Revealed by Transposon Mutagenesis Sequencing. Appl Environ Microbiol 88:e00642-22. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.00642-22 Wallner A, Klonowska A, Guigard L et al (2023) Comparative genomics and transcriptomic response to root exudates of six rice root-associated Burkholderia sensu lato species. Peer Community J. 3 https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.10.04.510755 Wang Y, Duan S, Xu J, Long Y et al (2023) Comparison of the colonization ability of Burkholderia strain B23 in the citrus rhizoplane and rhizosphere and assessment of the underlying mechanisms using full-length 16S rDNA amplicon and metatranscriptomic analyses. Microb Biotechnol 16:1657–1670. https://doi.org/10.1111/1751-7915.14248 Wang Y, Huang W, Ali S, Li Y, Yu F, Deng H (2022) Isolation, Identification, and characterization of an efficient siderophore producing bacterium from heavy metal contaminated soil. Curr Microbiol 79:227. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00284-022-02922-5 Xin G, Zhang G, Kang J, Staley J, Doty S (2009) A diazotrophic, indole-3-acetic acid-producing endophyte from wild cottonwood. Biol Fertil Soils 45:669–674. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-009-0377-5 Yabuuchi E, Kosako Y, Oyaizu H et al (1992) Proposal of Burkholderia gen. nov. and transfer of seven species of the genus Pseudomonas homology group II to the new genus, with the type species Burkholderia cepacia (Palleroni and Holmes 1981) comb. nov. Microbiol Immunol 36:1251–1275. https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/mandi1977/36/12/36_12_1251/_pdf Zapater R (1975) Evaluation of the rhizosphere/soil coefficient (R/S), under maize in relation to free-living nitrogen fixing bacteria. Anales Científicos 13:45–57 Zhang X, Huang Y, Harvey P, Ren Y, Zhang G, Zhou H, Yang H (2012) Enhancing plant disease suppression by Burkholderia vietnamiensis through chromosomal integration of Bacillus subtilis chitinase gene chi113. Biotechnol Lett 34:287–293. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10529-011-0760-z Zhao J, Zhao X, Wang J, Gong Q, Zhang X, Zhang G (2020) Isolation, identification and characterization of endophytic bacterium Rhizobium oryzihabitans sp. nov., from rice root with biotechnological potential in agriculture. Microorganisms 8:608. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms8040608 Additional Declarations No competing interests reported. Cite Share Download PDF Status: Under Review Version 1 posted Editor assigned by journal 17 Aug, 2024 Submission checks completed at journal 17 Aug, 2024 First submitted to journal 16 Aug, 2024 You are reading this latest preprint version Research Square lets you share your work early, gain feedback from the community, and start making changes to your manuscript prior to peer review in a journal. As a division of Research Square Company, we’re committed to making research communication faster, fairer, and more useful. We do this by developing innovative software and high quality services for the global research community. Our growing team is made up of researchers and industry professionals working together to solve the most critical problems facing scientific publishing. Also discoverable on Platform About Our Team In Review Editorial Policies Advisory Board Help Center Resources Author Services Accessibility API Access RSS feed Manage Cookie Preferences © Research Square 2026 | ISSN 2693-5015 (online) Privacy Policy Terms of Service Do Not Sell My Personal Information {"props":{"pageProps":{"initialData":{"identity":"rs-4927294","acceptedTermsAndConditions":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"archivedVersions":[],"articleType":"Research Article","associatedPublications":[],"authors":[{"id":341489038,"identity":"4e9a9c6f-eddf-4906-9377-c0623239473a","order_by":0,"name":"Patricia Pilar Meza-Catalán","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Laboratorio de Investigación en Biotecnología.","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Patricia","middleName":"Pilar","lastName":"Meza-Catalán","suffix":""},{"id":341489039,"identity":"eefb5b8c-515a-47b6-b8f4-4fb043ffac0a","order_by":1,"name":"Nayza Rosmery Asencios-Sifuentes","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Laboratorio de Investigación en Biotecnología.","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Nayza","middleName":"Rosmery","lastName":"Asencios-Sifuentes","suffix":""},{"id":341489040,"identity":"55f5bb95-395d-4c6e-ab01-522fe4127f31","order_by":2,"name":"Ángel Willian Ocaña-Rodríguez","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Universidad Nacional de Barranca","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Ángel","middleName":"Willian","lastName":"Ocaña-Rodríguez","suffix":""},{"id":341489041,"identity":"db8278b6-ba69-4ab2-b392-4c99d90d288c","order_by":3,"name":"Julio César Chávez-Galarza","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Universidad Nacional de Barranca","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Julio","middleName":"César","lastName":"Chávez-Galarza","suffix":""},{"id":341489042,"identity":"c7a2456b-d30c-4c80-9a50-a7e68dd018ff","order_by":4,"name":"Gilles Bena","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Plant Health Institute of Montpellier (PHIM)","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Gilles","middleName":"","lastName":"Bena","suffix":""},{"id":341489043,"identity":"1a8e1877-58ef-4488-bc21-51b21090afae","order_by":5,"name":"Renzo Alfredo Valdez-Nuñez","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Universidad Nacional de Barranca","correspondingAuthor":true,"prefix":"","firstName":"Renzo","middleName":"Alfredo","lastName":"Valdez-Nuñez","suffix":""}],"badges":[],"createdAt":"2024-08-17 00:23:22","currentVersionCode":1,"declarations":"","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-4927294/v1","doiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-4927294/v1","draftVersion":[],"editorialEvents":[],"editorialNote":"","failedWorkflow":false,"files":[{"id":64491672,"identity":"b269bb3e-8dab-4655-b70d-4d597637a5a0","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2024-09-13 20:45:48","extension":"jpg","order_by":1,"title":"Figure 1","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":47063,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eFingerprinting dendrogram of similarity based on the BOX-PCR profiles of the isolates of this study, using the UPGMA algorithm and the Jaccard coefficient with 2% tolerance using the online dendrogram construction utility DendroUPGMA (http:// genomes.urv.es/UPGMA/) (Garcia-Vallvé et al. 1999).\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"Figure01.jpg","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-4927294/v1/05c90f25bb2e46cd4ec60e4b.jpg"},{"id":64491673,"identity":"eb3a4f1e-473b-422b-9a60-b88b9ea30df6","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2024-09-13 20:45:48","extension":"jpg","order_by":2,"title":"Figure 2","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":180321,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eMaximum-Likelihood phylogenetic tree based on recA gene sequences (650 positions) showing the relationships among phytobeneficial \u003cem\u003eBurkholderia\u003c/em\u003e isolated in this study and closely related species of the genus \u003cem\u003eBurkholderia\u003c/em\u003e sensu stricto. The significance of each branch is indicated by a bootstrap value (as percentage) calculated for 1000 subsets (only values greater than 50 % are indicated). Bar, 5 substitution per 100 nucleotide positions. The recA sequence of \u003cem\u003eBradyrhizobium vignae\u003c/em\u003e 7-2\u003csup\u003eT\u003c/sup\u003e was used as outgroup.\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"Figure02.jpg","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-4927294/v1/bfb4da69f4686a8be02277c6.jpg"},{"id":64491671,"identity":"61e6ccee-b720-4db2-ba60-b83e7dd74d87","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2024-09-13 20:45:48","extension":"jpg","order_by":3,"title":"Figure 3","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":96246,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eProduction of siderophores by \u003cem\u003eBurkholderia vietnamiensis\u003c/em\u003e B168a on CAS agar\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"Figure03.jpg","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-4927294/v1/002b353419869431c5b61b96.jpg"},{"id":64491674,"identity":"ddca4bbd-cad8-4352-ab27-42a19bb2d8b2","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2024-09-13 20:45:48","extension":"jpg","order_by":4,"title":"Figure 4","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":261075,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eEvaluation of antagonism (A) and antibiosis (B) in five strains of \u003cem\u003eBurkholderia vietnamiensis\u003c/em\u003e against five strains of phytopathogenic rice fungi, RS1 (\u003cem\u003eRhizoctonia solani\u003c/em\u003e), ROS1 (\u003cem\u003eRhizoctonia oryzae-sativae\u003c/em\u003e), RO1 (\u003cem\u003eRhizoctonia oryzae\u003c/em\u003e), NS1 (\u003cem\u003eNakataea sigmoidea\u003c/em\u003e) and NO1 (\u003cem\u003eNigrospora oryzae\u003c/em\u003e)\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"Figure04.jpg","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-4927294/v1/f93d88a6479c97b8c0548dd1.jpg"},{"id":64491772,"identity":"5f6d98a5-de7e-4c7d-ab27-1fffab7ee58c","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2024-09-13 20:53:48","extension":"pdf","order_by":0,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"manuscript-pdf","size":1871035,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"manuscript.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-4927294/v1/a5099ce0-2792-4e19-baff-6cb12b6b8811.pdf"}],"financialInterests":"No competing interests reported.","formattedTitle":"Genetic diversity and characterization of the growth promotion mechanisms of Burkholderia vietnamiensis isolates from rice cultivars in valleys of the high jungle of Peru.","fulltext":[{"header":"Introduction","content":"\u003cp\u003e \u003cem\u003eBurkholderia\u003c/em\u003e sensu lato (s.l.) (Yabuuchi et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR104\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1992\u003c/span\u003e) are a group of Gram-negative bacteria that are ubiquitous in different ecological niches and belong to the subphylum β-proteobacteria. Currently, phylogenetic analyzes of conserved genes and comparative genomics, the \u003cem\u003eBurkholderia\u003c/em\u003e s.l. have reformed \u003cem\u003eBurkholderia\u003c/em\u003e s.l. into 7 new genera: \u003cem\u003eBurkholderia\u003c/em\u003e sensu stricto (s.s.), \u003cem\u003eCaballeronia\u003c/em\u003e (Dobritsa et al. 2016), \u003cem\u003eParaburkholderia\u003c/em\u003e (Sawana et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR81\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2014\u003c/span\u003e), \u003cem\u003eRobbsia\u003c/em\u003e (Lopes-Santos, 2017), \u003cem\u003eMycetohabitans\u003c/em\u003e and \u003cem\u003eTrinickia\u003c/em\u003e (Estrada de los santos et al. 2018), \u003cem\u003ePararobbsia\u003c/em\u003e (Lin et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR53\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2020\u003c/span\u003e). Within the genus \u003cem\u003eBurkholderia\u003c/em\u003e, the \u003cem\u003eBurkholderia cepacia\u003c/em\u003e complex (Bcc) comprises a group of species from different ecological niches and their metabolic versatility (Jin et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR44\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2020\u003c/span\u003e). It is characterized by mobility, strictly aerobic oxygen requirement and great metabolic versatility due to the diversity of ecological niches it occupies (Adaikpoh et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR2\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2022\u003c/span\u003e). It includes phytobeneficial species that promote plant growth, such as \u003cem\u003eB. ambifaria\u003c/em\u003e (Mullins et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR66\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2019\u003c/span\u003e), B. \u003cem\u003ecatarinensis\u003c/em\u003e (Bach et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR8\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2017\u003c/span\u003e), B. \u003cem\u003eorbicola\u003c/em\u003e (Morales-Ruiz et al. 2022) and \u003cem\u003eB. vietnamiensis\u003c/em\u003e (Wallner et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR99\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2022\u003c/span\u003e), as antagonists of phytopathogenic fungi and producers of metabolites of biotechnological interest (Depoorter et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR21\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2016\u003c/span\u003e; Elshafie and Camele, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR25\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2021\u003c/span\u003e). \u003cem\u003eBurkholderia\u003c/em\u003e isolates have enormous biotechnological potential, as many strains are producers of hydrolytic enzymes and bioactive substances that promote plant growth and health, and degrade several recalcitrant pollutants (Eberl and Vandamme, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR24\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2016\u003c/span\u003e; Rojas-Rojas et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR76\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2019\u003c/span\u003e; Alam et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR5\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2022\u003c/span\u003e). On the other hand, some members of the Bcc have also been reported as opportunistic pathogens in humans and animals (Eberl and Vandamme, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR24\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2016\u003c/span\u003e; Fu et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR32\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2022\u003c/span\u003e), preventing their use as bioinoculant in the field.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003ePlants have co-evolved with various microorganisms, allowing them to survive in hostile environmental conditions. This association between plants and microorganisms takes place at the level of the rhizosphere, endosphere and/or phyllosphere (Afzal et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR3\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2019\u003c/span\u003e). The relationships between plants and \u003cem\u003eBurkholderia\u003c/em\u003e sensu stricto can be mutualistic or pathogenic. Mutualistic or phytobeneficial relationships are usually associated at the rhizosphere level (Lopes-Santos et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR56\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2017\u003c/span\u003e; Aba Regis et al. 2021; Draghi et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR23\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2021\u003c/span\u003e) or at the endosphere level (Fu et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR31\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2017\u003c/span\u003e; Kong et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR50\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2020\u003c/span\u003e; Shinjo et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR86\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2020\u003c/span\u003e). Among the phytobeneficial \u003cem\u003eBurkholderia\u003c/em\u003e sensu stricto, \u003cem\u003eB. vietnamiensis\u003c/em\u003e (Gillis et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR36\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1995\u003c/span\u003e) is considered a nitrogen-fixing endophyte that is characterized by a mutualistic relationship with \u003cem\u003eOryza sativa\u003c/em\u003e and considered a model bacterium for growth promotion in rice (Wallner et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR99\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2022\u003c/span\u003e; King et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR48\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2023\u003c/span\u003e). Several studies have been reported that \u003cem\u003eB. vietnamiensis\u003c/em\u003e strains promote plant growth, through direct mechanisms, such as the production of phytohormones, siderophores, 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate (ACC) deaminase and nitrogen fixation, and indirect promotion mechanisms, such as biocontrol associated with the production of metabolites. antifungal, antibacterial and quorum quenching (Romero-Guti\u0026eacute;rrez et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR77\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2020\u003c/span\u003e; Meng et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR63\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2023\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cem\u003eB. vietnamiensis\u003c/em\u003e has been reported as an endophyte associated with \u003cem\u003eFicus tikoua\u003c/em\u003e (Meng et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR63\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2023\u003c/span\u003e), \u003cem\u003eIpomoea batatas\u003c/em\u003e (Shinjo et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR85\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2018\u003c/span\u003e), \u003cem\u003ePopulus trichocarpa\u003c/em\u003e (Xin et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR103\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2009\u003c/span\u003e) and very frequently in rice (Govindarajan et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR39\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2008\u003c/span\u003e; da Silva Ara\u0026uacute;jo et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR88\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2013\u003c/span\u003e; Estrada et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR26\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2013\u003c/span\u003e; R\u0026iacute;os-Ruiz et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR75\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2020\u003c/span\u003e; Valdez-Nu\u0026ntilde;ez et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR96\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2020\u003c/span\u003e; Kuang et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR51\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2024\u003c/span\u003e). The interactions between \u003cem\u003eB. vietnamiensis\u003c/em\u003e and rice interactions are very competent and persistent in the rhizosphere, synthesising a large number of secondary metabolites and expressing direct and indirect growth mechanisms, which is why it is considered a bacterial model of growth promotion to be studied (Wallner et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR99\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2022\u003c/span\u003e). Recently, Liu et al (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR54\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2022\u003c/span\u003e) demonstrated thath \u003cem\u003eB. vietnamiensis\u003c/em\u003e could inhibit root-knot nematode on watermelon by modifying the rhizosphere microbial community.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThere is evidence for the growth promoting potential of \u003cem\u003eB. vietnamiensis\u003c/em\u003e in rice (Govindarajan et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR39\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2008\u003c/span\u003e; Shinjo et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR86\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2020\u003c/span\u003e; R\u0026iacute;os-Ruiz et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR75\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2020\u003c/span\u003e). Recently, Shinjo et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR86\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2020\u003c/span\u003e, reported that \u003cem\u003eB. vietnamiensis\u003c/em\u003e improved rice seedlings growth, enhanced root development and increased nitrogen mobilisation and assimilation. Unfortunately, these phytobeneficial species isolated from the rhizosphere and endosphere of plants could not be used as inoculants on a commercial scale, due to a moratorium imposed in the 1990s on the grounds that they could pose a health risk (Eberl and Vandamme, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR24\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2016\u003c/span\u003e). However, in recent years, there has been an increase in the number of new \u003cem\u003eBurkholderia\u003c/em\u003e species that are beneficial to plants and that are not isolated from clinical sources. For this reason, there is an urgent need to develop new strategies, both to reduce the use of nitrogenous fertilizers, which can be addressed through the study of phytobeneficial \u003cem\u003eBurkholderia\u003c/em\u003e associated with rice cultivation in the San Martin region. It is important to study the genetic diversity among \u003cem\u003eBurkholderia\u003c/em\u003e species and to resolve their taxonomy, especially to distinguish strains with phytobeneficial potential, from those with opportunistic pathogenic capacity. In addition, knowing the diversity and identity of phytobeneficial \u003cem\u003eBurkholderia\u003c/em\u003e strains, we will be able to select strains to study at a level of genomic resolution that allows better decisions of study. The aims of this work were: 1) isolate root endophytic bacteria (potentially phytobeneficial) from rice cultivars in four valleys of the San Mart\u0026iacute;n region, 2) select and identify phytobeneficial \u003cem\u003eBurkholderia\u003c/em\u003e sensu stricto strains using specific molecular markers, 3) to study genetic diversity and the phylogenetic relationship among \u003cem\u003eBurkholderia\u003c/em\u003e sensu stricto strains, and 4) To evaluate the direct and indirect growth promotion mechanisms of \u003cem\u003eB. vietnamiensis\u003c/em\u003e strains and their response to inoculation in two local rice cultivars.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Materials and methods","content":"\u003cdiv id=\"Sec3\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eCollection of rice samples\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eRoot samples of different rice varieties were collected from the Bajo Mayo, Altomayo, Alto Huallaga and Central Huallaga valleys in the San Mart\u0026iacute;n-Per\u0026uacute; region. Root samples were obtained from plants at the tillering stage according to Ji et al. (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR43\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2014\u003c/span\u003e). Root samples were processed, coded, and transported in falcon tubes (50 mL) at 4\u0026deg;C. Georeferencing data and cultivation history were recorded for each sample.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec4\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eIsolation of endophytic bacteria from roots of rice\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003e Endophytic bacteria were isolated from roots according to the method proposed by Baldani et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR11\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2014\u003c/span\u003e. Roots were washed with copious amount of water to remove soil remnants and immersed successively in 70% ethanol solution for 3 min, sodium hypochlorite solution (2.5%) for 5 min, 70% ethanol solution for 30 s, and rinsed five times with sterile distilled water (Sun et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR92\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2008\u003c/span\u003e). To confirm the success of the disinfection process, 100 \u0026micro;L of sterile distilled water from the last rinse of each sample were streaked on the surface on plates containing Tryptone Soy Agar (TSA) and incubated at 28\u0026deg;C for 3 days (Valdez et al. 2020). Only samples with no growth were considered suitable for further analysis. Root tissues were macerated with sterile physiological saline solution (0.85%) and 100 \u0026micro;L were inoculated into JMV nitrogen-free semi-solid medium (Baldani et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR10\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1996\u003c/span\u003e) containing (g L\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;1\u003c/sup\u003e) mannitol, 5.0; K\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003eHPO\u003csub\u003e4\u003c/sub\u003e, 0.6; KH\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003ePO\u003csub\u003e4\u003c/sub\u003e, 1.8; MgSO\u003csub\u003e4\u003c/sub\u003e 7H\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003eO, 0.2; NaCl, 0.1; CaCl\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003e.2H\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003eO, 0.2; Bromothymol blue (5 g L\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;1\u003c/sup\u003e in 0.2 N KOH), 2 mL; FeEDTA (16.4 g L\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;1\u003c/sup\u003e), 4 mL; micronutrient solution, 2 mL; vitamin solution (1 mL). Distilled water is added to make up 1000 mL, pH is adjusted to 5.2\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.2 with KOH and agar added at a rate of 1.8 g L\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;1\u003c/sup\u003e. The appearance of a pellicle under the culture medium after 4 days of incubation indicated the presence of diazotrophic endophytic bacteria. This bacterial film was streaked in Petri dishes containing nitrogen-free solid JMV medium (agar, 15 g L\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;1\u003c/sup\u003e) and incubated at 30\u0026deg;C for 5 days until colonies appeared. Isolates with different morphocolonial characteristics in each sample were purified by the streaking technique in Petri dishes containing TSA until pure cultures were obtained. The preservation of the collection was carried out by cryopreservation at -20\u0026deg;C and \u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;80\u0026deg;C, as suggested by Garc\u0026iacute;a and Cotter (2016), and Cui et al. (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR18\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2021\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec5\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eGenomic DNA extraction\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eGenomic DNA was extracted from bacterial cultures incubated overnight in Tryptone Soy Broth (TSB) (25 mL) at 28\u0026deg;C, shaken at 150 rpm, and the cell pellet was harvested by centrifugation at 13,000 rpm for 3 min (Bach, 2017). The commercial GenElute\u0026trade; Bacterial Genomic DNA kit (Sigma Aldrich, USA) was used according to the manufacturer's instructions. The DNA concentration was measured in a NanoDrop one spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific, USA) and the quality verified in a 1% agarose gel, using Diamond\u0026trade; Nucleic Acid Dye (Promega, USA) and visualised in a black light electrophoresis chamber (Cleaver Scientific Ltd., UK). The original DNA was stored at -20\u0026deg;C and \u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;80\u0026deg;C.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cb\u003eMolecular discrimination of\u003c/b\u003e \u003cb\u003eBurkholderia\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eStrains belonging to the genus \u003cem\u003eBurkholderia\u003c/em\u003e were selected using specific primers \u003cem\u003erecA\u003c/em\u003e (Spilker et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR90\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2009\u003c/span\u003e). The primers \u003cem\u003erec\u003c/em\u003eA-F (forward) 5\u0026rsquo;-AGGACGATTCATGGAAGAWAGC-3\u0026rsquo; and \u003cem\u003erec\u003c/em\u003eA-R (reverse) 5\u0026rsquo;-GACGCACYGAYGMRTAGAACTT-3\u0026rsquo;, amplify a specific sequence of approximately 704 bp of the \u003cem\u003erec\u003c/em\u003eA gene. The polymerase chain reaction was performed in a Biometra thermal cycler (Analytic Jena, Germany). PCR reactions were performed using a 25 \u0026micro;L reaction mix containing 1.0 \u0026micro;L template DNA (50 ng), 12.5 \u0026micro;L KAPA Taq ReadyMix\u0026trade; (2x) (Sigma-Aldrich, USA) (DNA polymerase, 0.05 units \u0026micro;L\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;1\u003c/sup\u003e, 3 mM MgCl\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003e, 400 \u0026micro;M each dNTP), 1.0 \u0026micro;L of each primer (5 pmol each forward and reverse), and 9.5 \u0026micro;L of PCR grade water (Sigma-Aldrich, USA). The PCR cycle was as follows: initial denaturation at 95\u0026deg;C for 2 minutes, 30 cycles of denaturation for 30 s at 94\u0026deg;C, annealing at 58\u0026deg;C for 30 seconds, an extension for 60 seconds at 72\u0026deg;C, and a final extension at 72\u0026deg;C of 5 min. Two \u0026micro;L of each PCR product was visualized on a 1.0% agarose gel in 0.5X TAE buffer according to Mahenthiralingam et al. (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR60\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2000\u003c/span\u003e). Positive amplification of the fragment allowed the discrimination of strains of the genus \u003cem\u003eBurkholderia\u003c/em\u003e. The PCR products were purified and sequenced by MACROGEN Inc. (South Korea).\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec6\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eBOX-PCR genomic profiles:\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eGenomic profiles were obtained by amplifying genomic DNA using the BOX-A1R primer (5'-CTACGGCAAGGCGACGCTGACG-3') (Koeuth et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR49\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1995\u003c/span\u003e) in a Biometra Tone thermal cycler (Analytic Jena), following the cycle program described by Arone. et al. (2014). PCR products were separated on a 1.5% agarose gel running at 60 V for 8 hours and then visualised in a black light electrophoresis chamber (Cleaver Scientific Ltd., UK). The DirectLoad\u0026trade; 1 kb DNA Ladder (Sigma Aldrich, USA) was used as a molecular weight marker. The genomic profiles of the individual strains generated were photographed, digitised, and converted into a binary matrix of the presence or absence of DNA bands. Cluster analysis allowed the construction of dendrograms using the free programme DendroUPGMA (\u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttp://genomes.urv.es/UPGMA/\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"http://genomes.urv.es/UPGMA/\" targettype=\"URL\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e) (Garc\u0026iacute;a-Vallv\u0026eacute; et al., 1999), applying the UPGMA algorithm, (Unweighted Pair-Group Method with Arithmetic Mean) (Sneath and Sokal \u003cspan citationid=\"CR89\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1962\u003c/span\u003e), and the Jaccard t coefficient (Jaccard \u003cspan citationid=\"CR42\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1912\u003c/span\u003e), with 2% tolerance.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cb\u003erec\u003c/b\u003e \u003cb\u003eA gene phylogeny\u003c/b\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe \u003cem\u003erec\u003c/em\u003eA sequences obtained were compared with those from GenBank using the BLASTN algorithm (Altschul et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR6\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1990\u003c/span\u003e). Sequences of all type strains of the genus \u003cem\u003eBurkholderia\u003c/em\u003e sensu stricto were obtained from the NCBI database and aligned using ClustalW (Thompson et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR94\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1994\u003c/span\u003e). Phylogenetic trees were reconstructed using a maximum likelihood (ML) approach (Saitou and Nei, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR78\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1987\u003c/span\u003e), using the MEGA X software (Kumar et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR52\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2018\u003c/span\u003e). Pairwise distances were calculated using MEGA X (Kumar et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR52\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2018\u003c/span\u003e) with the two-parameter Kimura model (Kimura, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR46\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1980\u003c/span\u003e). The topological robustness of the ML tree was inferred by non-parametric bootstrap analysis based on 100 pseudoreplicates.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec7\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eCharacterization of growth promotion mechanisms:\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eStandardised inocula of five \u003cem\u003eB. vietnamiensis\u003c/em\u003e strains representing each different BOX-PCR group were cultured in TSB broth at 150 rpm and incubated overnight at 28\u0026deg;C, cells were harvested by centrifugation at 13,000 rpm for 3 min (Bach, 2017) and washed at least twice with 0.85% sterile physiological saline. The cell suspension was standardised to an OD600 nm of 1.0 and used to evaluate growth promotion mechanisms.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec8\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eAuxin production:\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eAuxin production was assayed by seeding 200 \u0026micro;L of standardised inoculum in 20 mL of TSB broth supplemented with L-tryptophan as precursor (Gravel et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR41\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2007\u003c/span\u003e; Ji et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR43\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2014\u003c/span\u003e) at increasing concentrations (0, 50, 100, 200, 400, 600 \u0026micro;g mL-1). Treatments were incubated for 24 h at 26\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;2\u0026deg;C with shaking at 150 rpm. The supernatant of each treatment was obtained by centrifugation at 8000 rpm for 15 minutes at 4\u0026deg;C. Salkowski's reagent (150 mL of H\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003eSO\u003csub\u003e4\u003c/sub\u003e was mixed, 250 mL of distilled water, 7.5 mL of 0.5 M FeCl\u003csub\u003e3\u003c/sub\u003e.6H\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003eO solution) was mixed with the supernatant in equal parts (1:1) and left in the dark for 30 minutes. The absorbance of the mixture was then measured at 535 nm in a spectrophotometer (PG Instruments Ltd, UK). The concentration of IAA was estimated from a standard curve.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec9\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eNitrogen fixation:\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eAsymbiotic nitrogen fixation capacity was tested according to R\u0026iacute;os-Ruiz et al. 2023. The nitrogen fixation capacity was tested in a mineral medium without nitrogen \u0026ndash; MM-N (Zapater, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR105\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1975\u003c/span\u003e) (g L-1) - Mannitol, 10.0 g; Sucrose, 10.0 g; K\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003eHPO\u003csub\u003e4\u003c/sub\u003e, 0.6551 g; KH\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003ePO\u003csub\u003e4\u003c/sub\u003e, 0.15 g; FeCl\u003csub\u003e3\u003c/sub\u003e, 0.0034 g; Na\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003eMoO\u003csub\u003e4\u003c/sub\u003e. 2 H\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003eO, 0.0108 g; NaCl, 0.02 g; CaCl\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003e. 2 H\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003eO, 0.01; MgSO\u003csub\u003e4\u003c/sub\u003e. 2H\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003eO, 0.2 g; 1.6 g (semi-solid) or 16 g (solid) agar-agar, 0.5 mL bromothymol blue solution (0.5% in 70% ethanol), pH 7.0\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.2. The standardised inocula were seeded on the surface of the semi-solid MM-N at a rate of 10% (150 \u0026micro;L per tube). The formation of a sub-pellicle under the semi-solid MM-N culture medium and the appearance of colonies in the solid MM-N medium, as well as the turning of the bromothymol blue indicator, indicated nitrogen fixation activity.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec10\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eSiderophores production\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe qualitative production of siderophores by \u003cem\u003eB. vietnamiensis\u003c/em\u003e strains was detected on chrome azurol-S (CAS) agar (Schwyn and Neilands, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR82\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1987\u003c/span\u003e). CAS agar consisted of a mixture of a CAS staining solution (solutions 1 and 2) and Succinate medium (SM). For solution 1 (60 mL), 60.5 mg of CAS (Hi-media, India) was dissolved in 50 mL of distilled water (pH 7.0) and then mixed with 10 mL of 1 mM FeCl\u003csub\u003e3\u003c/sub\u003e 6 H\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003eO (5.4 mg FeCl\u003csub\u003e3\u003c/sub\u003e.6 H\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003eO) dissolved in 10 mM HCl (0.822 mL of 37% HCl and density of 1.19 in 100 mL of distilled water). Using a magnetic stirrer, solution 1 was slowly added to solution 2 (72.84 mg HDMTA (Merck, Germany) dissolved in 40 mL distilled water, pH 7.0). The resulting solution (100 mL) was autoclaved at 121\u0026deg;C for 20 minutes and cooled to 50\u0026deg;C. For the SM culture medium, 720 mL of SM broth was added to 27.45 g of PIPES (Sigma-Aldrich, USA), the pH was reduced to 3.0 and corrected to 6.8 using 30% KOH solution. The final mixture was made up to 810 mL with SM broth and supplemented with 15.0 g of agar-agar, then autoclaved at 121\u0026deg;C for 20 minutes and cooled to 60\u0026deg;C. The CAS agar was completed by mixing 810 mL of SM culture medium and 90 mL of CAS staining solution and then distributing the CAS agar in Petri dishes. Each strain was separately inoculated (20 \u0026micro;L) onto Petri dishes containing CAS agar and incubated at 28\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;2\u0026deg;C for 72 hours in triplicate. The plates were scored by the colour change from blue to orange, the diameter of the siderophore production halo was evaluated and the efficiency of siderophore production was determined using the formula\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eE%= [(halo diameter - colony diameter)/colony diameter] x 100. Samples were analysed in triplicate.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec11\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003ePhosphate solubilization\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003ePhosphate solubilisation was evaluated qualitatively according to Ram\u0026iacute;rez-Bahena et al. (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR72\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2015\u003c/span\u003e) and quantitatively according to Marra et al. (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR62\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2012\u003c/span\u003e) and Song et al. (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR91\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2008\u003c/span\u003e), both performed in agar and National Botanical Research Institute's phosphate (NBRIP) broth, respectively. The NBRIP medium had the following composition: glucose 10 gL-1, Ca\u003csub\u003e3\u003c/sub\u003e(PO\u003csub\u003e4\u003c/sub\u003e)\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003e, 5 g; (NH\u003csub\u003e4\u003c/sub\u003e)\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003eSO\u003csub\u003e4\u003c/sub\u003e, 0.1 g; MgCl\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003e.6H\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003eO, 5 g; MgSO\u003csub\u003e4\u003c/sub\u003e.7H\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003eO, 0.25 g and KCl, 0.2 g (Nautiyal, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR68\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1999\u003c/span\u003e). The pH was adjusted to 7.0 prior to autoclaving. For qualitative assessment, the NBRIP broth was supplemented with 1.5% agar (Hi-media, India), autoclaved and served in Petri dishes. For each strain, 20 \u0026micro;L of standardised inoculum was inoculated in quadruplicate into a Petri dish containing NBRIP agar. The inoculated plates were incubated at 28\u0026deg;C and the solubilization diameter halo (translucent area around the colony) was measured using an electronic vernier after 15 days of incubation. The solubilisation index (SI)\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;halo diameter (mm)/colony diameter (mm) was determined as proposed by Marra et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR62\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2012\u003c/span\u003e. For quantitative evaluation, 200 \u0026micro;L of standardised inoculum were inoculated in triplicate into 20 mL of NBRIP broth and incubated at 26\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;2\u0026deg;C at 150 rpm for 24 h. At the end of this period, the inoculum was discarded. At the end of this period, the supernatant was centrifuged (13,500 rpm for 5 minutes), the pH was measured and the amount of soluble P was quantified using the phosphomolybdate method (Murphey and Riley, 1962). The blank treatment consisted of the NBRIP broth without inoculation and shaking. The strains with phosphate solubilising capacity were those with a soluble P concentration higher than the blank treatment.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec12\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eAntibiosis and antagonism against phytopathogenic fungi:\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe methods used to study the indirect mechanisms related to the biocontrol of phytopathogenic fungi in rice in five strains of \u003cem\u003eB. vietnamiensis\u003c/em\u003e were antagonism and antibiosis, as proposed by Castellano-Hinojosa and Bedmar (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR16\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2017\u003c/span\u003e) and R\u0026iacute;os-Ruiz et al. (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR75\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2020\u003c/span\u003e). Several phytopathogenic fungi, i. e. \u003cem\u003eRhizoctonia solani\u003c/em\u003e (RS1), \u003cem\u003eRhizoctonia oryzae\u003c/em\u003e (RO1), \u003cem\u003eRhizoctonia oryzae-sativae\u003c/em\u003e (ROS1), \u003cem\u003eNakataea sigmoidea\u003c/em\u003e (NS1) and \u003cem\u003eNigrospora oryzae\u003c/em\u003e (NO1), were donated by the Plant Disease Diagnostic Centre, Faculty of Agrarian Sciences-Universidad Nacional de Tumbes, and were cultured on potato dextrose agar (PDA).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eFor antagonism assays, fungi were first grown in PDA medium and used to take 1 cm diameter agar plugs, which were placed in the centre of plates containing PDA medium that had previously been independently inoculated with 100 \u0026micro;L of each of the strains grown in TSB. The cells were incubated for 72 hours at 25\u0026deg;C and the diameter of the inhibition zones was recorded after 7 days. The percentage of inhibition was calculated using the formula: % inhibition = [(R1-R2/R1) x 100, where R1 is the diameter of the fungal mycelium in plates not inoculated with the bacterial culture and R2 is the diameter of the fungal mycelium in plates inoculated with the bacterial culture. For the antibiosis test, the agar plugs containing the fungus were placed in the centre of a plate containing PDA medium, with the strains to be inoculated in the three equidistant quadrants of the plate at a rate of 20 \u0026micro;L for each strain. The inhibitory effect on fungal growth was evaluated after 7 days at 25\u0026deg;C and the percentage of inhibition relative to the control (without bacteria) was evaluated as indicated above. Both assays were performed in triplicate and incubated for 48 h at 25\u0026deg;C.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec13\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eEvaluation of growth promotion in two rice cultivars:\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eFor the standardisation of inocula, the methodologies proposed by Granada et al. (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR40\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2014\u003c/span\u003e) for germination and vigour index assays and by Wallner et al. (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR100\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2023\u003c/span\u003e) for growth promotion assays were applied. \u003cem\u003eB. vietnamiensis\u003c/em\u003e strains were cultured in 3 mL of TSB and incubated at 28\u0026deg;C for 24 h at 170 rpm. The fermented broth was centrifuged at 10,000 rpm for 10 minutes at 4\u0026deg;C to harvest the cells. The cell pellet was washed at least twice with sterile 10 mM MgSO\u003csub\u003e4\u003c/sub\u003e solution at 10,000 rpm for 5 minutes. The cell suspension was adjusted to an OD\u003csub\u003e600 nm\u003c/sub\u003e of 0.001 (approximately 2 x 10\u003csup\u003e6\u003c/sup\u003e CFU mL-1) for the germination and vigour index assays and to an OD\u003csub\u003e600 nm\u003c/sub\u003e of 1.0 (approximately 5 x 10\u003csup\u003e9\u003c/sup\u003e CFU mL-1) for the growth promotion assay. Finally, the cell count was verified by the drop method in Petri dishes containing TSA agar (Ferreira et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR30\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2024\u003c/span\u003e). The rice varieties used were INIA-510, La Conquista (LC) and INIA 507, La Esperanza (LE), both from the National Rice Programme, El Porvenir-San Mart\u0026iacute;n Experimental Station of the Instituto Nacional de Innovaci\u0026oacute;n Agraria (INIA). For the trials, seeds of both varieties were surface disinfected according to the methodology proposed by Ji et al. (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR43\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2014\u003c/span\u003e): seeds were immersed in a 5% NaOCl solution for 8 min, rinsed three times with sterile distilled water, immersed once in a 70% ethanol solution and finally rinsed six times with sterile distilled water.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec14\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eGermination test and vigour index\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eTo evaluate the germination percentage and the vigour index, a completely randomized experimental design was used, with a factorial arrangement of seven treatments for two rice varieties (LC and LE) and with five replicates of ten seeds each. The inoculated treatments consisted of five strains of \u003cem\u003eB. vietnamiensis\u003c/em\u003e (T1 to T5), a treatment inoculated with the control strain \u003cem\u003ePriestia megaterium\u003c/em\u003e SMBH14-02 (R\u0026iacute;os-Ruiz et al. 2023) and a blank treatment. Fifty disinfected seeds were placed in a sterile tube (50 mL) and inoculated by immersion with 25 mL of standardised inoculum per strain and 25 mL of 10 mM MgSO\u003csub\u003e4\u003c/sub\u003e solution for the blank treatment. The treatments were incubated for two hours at room temperature under the same conditions. The inoculated seeds were sown on absorbent paper at the bottom of Magenta\u0026reg; boxes (200 mL) previously sterilised at 121\u0026deg;C for 30 minutes and moistened with 4 mL of sterile distilled water. The treatments were incubated in the dark at 25\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;1\u0026deg;C for 10 days and the following parameters were evaluated: plumule length (cm), root length (cm), germination percentage (%) and vigour index using the formula.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e(Length of aerial part\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;Length of radicle) * germination (%)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec15\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eGrowth promotion evaluation\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eTo evaluate growth promotion, a completely randomized experimental design was used, with a factorial arrangement of seven treatments for two rice varieties (LC and LE) and with ten replicates each. The inoculated treatments consisted of five strains of \u003cem\u003eB. vietnamiensis\u003c/em\u003e (T1 to T5), a treatment inoculated with the control strain \u003cem\u003eP. megaterium\u003c/em\u003e SMBH14-02 (R\u0026iacute;os-Ruiz et al. 2023) and a blank treatment. The disinfected seeds were placed in Petri dishes (15 x 150 mm) containing 1% (w/v) sterile water agar and germinated, at 25\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;1\u0026deg;C for 3 days in the dark until 1 cm radicles were obtained. The germinated seeds were sown in previously disinfected polypropylene pots (9 x 9 cm, 250 mL) with 85 g of fertilised and sterilized greenhouse substrate (Klasmann TS 1\u0026reg;, Lithuania) irrigated with 55 mL of sterile water distilled to reach a capacity of 60% field. Inoculation was carried out at a rate of 1 mL of standardised inoculum per seed and 1 mL of 10 mM MgSO\u003csub\u003e4\u003c/sub\u003e solution for the blank treatment. The treatments were watered at least twice a week with 50% Hoagland nutrient solution supplemented with 1% KNO\u003csub\u003e3\u003c/sub\u003e to 60% field capacity through an irrigation tube installed in each pot. The seedlings were maintained under controlled conditions (80% humidity at 28\u0026deg;C, 16 h light: 8 h dark) and after 21 days the following parameters were evaluated: Height (cm), root length (cm), Shoot Dry Weight (SDW) (mg), Root Dry Weight (RDW) (mg), leaf and root nitrogen content (%).\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec16\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eStatistical analyses\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eNormality and homoscedasticity of the data were tested. Significant differences between strains and their effects on the growth promotion mechanisms in two rice varieties were studied using an analysis of variance (ANOVA) using the R command package in R studio desktop version 1.3.1093. The Tukey test was used with a significance level of 95% (P\u0026thinsp;\u0026le;\u0026thinsp;0.05) when parametric data were available, otherwise the Kruskal-Walli test was used with a significance level of 95% (P\u0026thinsp;\u0026le;\u0026thinsp;0.05). Correlations between variables were estimated using Pearson's correlation. The difference in germination rate between the two cultivars was tested with a two-tailed t-test, and the difference in germination rate for each cultivar, whether inoculated with inocula or with MgSO\u003csub\u003e4\u003c/sub\u003e solution, was tested with the empirical rule, where 99.7% of the values are within three standard deviations of the mean.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e"},{"header":"Results","content":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eI\u003c/strong\u003eso\u003cstrong\u003elation and characterization of strains\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eWe collected 132 root samples from cultivated rice varieties in the four rice valleys of Bajo Mayo (30), Alto Mayo (57), Huallaga Central (15) and Alto Huallaga (30) (Table 01). We isolated 211 Gram-negative bacterial isolates from the surface-sterilised roots; however, only 78 strains (36% of the total) showed nitrogen-fixing ability in our tests. As we were focusing on \u003cem\u003eB. vietnamiensis\u003c/em\u003e, a nitrogen-fixing species, we only kept these isolated for further analysis. Most (44, 57.90%) of these Gram-negative and diazotrophic isolates came from plants grown in the Huallaga Central Valley, while only 6 came from plants grown in the Alto Mayo Valley.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eMolecular discrimination of \u003cem\u003eBurkholderia\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eOnly 4 isolates (5.13%) from our collection of Gram-negative and nitrogen-fixing bacteria, together with two previously isolated strains of \u003cem\u003eB. vietnamiensis\u003c/em\u003e la3c3 and la1a4 (R\u0026iacute;os-Ruiz et al. 2020), amplified a fragment of 704 bp corresponding to the \u003cem\u003erec\u003c/em\u003eA gene using primers specific to \u003cem\u003eBurkholderia\u003c/em\u003e. Sequencing of the \u003cem\u003erec\u003c/em\u003eA gene confirmed the taxonomic identity of the isolates in the species\u003cem\u003e\u0026nbsp;B. vietnamiensis\u003c/em\u003e. These 4 isolates all originated from the Alto Huallaga valley, and more specifically from the Nueva Esperanza sector of the Uchiza district. The la3c3 and la1a4 strains were originally sampled from the Central Huallaga valley (R\u0026iacute;os-Ruiz et al. 2020)\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eBOX-PCR genomic profiling\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eTo study the intraspecific diversity of the six \u003cem\u003eB. vietnamiensis\u003c/em\u003e strains, genomic DNA profiles were performed using BOX-PCR analysis. The fragments obtained ranged from 500 to 10,000 bp. Using a similarity level of 90% as a cut-off point, 5 different groups were obtained (Figure 01). These groups were named from G1 (BOX group 1) to G5 (BOX group 5). Each group, except G1, contains only one isolate. The strains la3c3 and la1a4 fall into two different BOX-PCR groups. Based on the BOX-PCR dendrogram, one strain per group was selected for amplification, sequencing and phylogenetic study of the \u003cem\u003erec\u003c/em\u003eA gene.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ctable border=\"0\" cellspacing=\"0\" cellpadding=\"0\" width=\"895\"\u003e\n \u003ctbody\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"100%\" colspan=\"7\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eTable 1.\u003c/strong\u003e Geographical location of rices collections and distribution of diazotrophic Gram-negative strains isolated from surface sterilized roots from rice varieties from rice valleys in the San Martin Region\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"6.935123042505593%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eValley\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"9.507829977628635%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eProvince\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"15.324384787472036%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eDistrict/Sector\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"18.344519015659955%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eRice Cultivar\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"16.21923937360179%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eGeographical coordinates\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"7.6062639821029085%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eAmount of samples\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"26.062639821029084%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eNumber and code of diazotrophic Gram-negative\u003cem\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003estrains\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"6.935123042505593%\" rowspan=\"2\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eBajo Mayo\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"9.507829977628635%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eLamas\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"15.324384787472036%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eCacatachi/Rosanaico\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"18.344519015659955%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eLa Conquista\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"16.21923937360179%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e6\u0026deg; 28\u0026apos; 11\u0026quot; S, 76\u0026deg; 26\u0026apos; 26\u0026quot; W; 299 m.a.s.l.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"7.6062639821029085%\" rowspan=\"2\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e30\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"26.062639821029084%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e(3)-B1; B3; B13\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"11.12565445026178%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eSan Mart\u0026iacute;n\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"17.93193717277487%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eJuan Guerra/Estaci\u0026oacute;n El Porvenir\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"21.465968586387433%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eLa Conquista, Valor, La Esperanza, Fedearroz 60\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"18.979057591623036%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e6\u0026deg; 35\u0026apos; 49\u0026quot; S, 76\u0026deg; 19\u0026apos; 32\u0026quot; W; 309 m.a.s.l.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"30.49738219895288%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e(4)-B34; B37; B48; B49\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"6.935123042505593%\" rowspan=\"2\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eAlto Mayo\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"9.507829977628635%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eRioja\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"15.324384787472036%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eAwajun/San Francisco de Amayo\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"18.344519015659955%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eValor, La Esperanza, La Victoria\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"16.21923937360179%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e5\u0026deg; 46\u0026apos; 43\u0026quot; S, 77\u0026deg; 18\u0026apos; 29\u0026quot; W; 916 m.a.s.l.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"7.6062639821029085%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e36\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"26.062639821029084%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e(3)-B51; B52; B74\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"10.216346153846153%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eMoyobamba\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"16.466346153846153%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eMoyobamba/La conquista\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"19.71153846153846%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eValor\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"17.427884615384617%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e5\u0026deg; 52\u0026apos; 41\u0026quot; S, 77\u0026deg; 10\u0026apos; 10\u0026quot; W; 913 m.a.s.l.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"8.173076923076923%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e21\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"28.004807692307693%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e(3)-B61; B89; B90\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"6.935123042505593%\" rowspan=\"4\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eHuallaga Central\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"9.507829977628635%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eBellavista\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"15.324384787472036%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eBellavista/El Porvenir\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"18.344519015659955%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eFer\u0026oacute;n\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"16.21923937360179%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e7\u0026deg; 03\u0026apos; 11\u0026quot; S, 76\u0026deg; 33\u0026apos; 54\u0026quot; W; 235 m.a.s.l.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"7.6062639821029085%\" rowspan=\"4\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e15\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"26.062639821029084%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e(9)-B91; B92; B94; B102; B103; B104; B105; B106; B106a\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"11.12565445026178%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eBellavista\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"17.93193717277487%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eSan Rafael/Carhuapoma\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"21.465968586387433%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eLa Esperanza\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"18.979057591623036%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e7\u0026deg; 00\u0026apos; 21\u0026quot; S, 76\u0026deg; 30\u0026apos; 08\u0026quot; W; 228 m.a.s.l.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"30.49738219895288%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e(9)-B126; B129; B130; B131; B135; B138; B139; B140; B142\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"11.12565445026178%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003ePicota\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"17.93193717277487%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003ePicota/Santa Rocillo\u003cstrong\u003e-(E)\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"21.465968586387433%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eValor\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"18.979057591623036%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e6\u0026deg; 55\u0026apos; 32\u0026quot; S, 76\u0026deg; 22\u0026apos; 23\u0026quot; W; 218 m.a.s.l.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"30.49738219895288%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e(21)-B107; B108; B109; B110; B111; B113; B114; B115; B118; B119; B121; B122; B124; B154; B155a; B158; B159; B160; B161; B162; B163\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"11.12565445026178%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003ePicota\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"17.93193717277487%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eSan Hilari\u0026oacute;n/San Hilari\u0026oacute;n\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"21.465968586387433%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eFer\u0026oacute;n\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"18.979057591623036%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e6\u0026deg; 59\u0026apos; 55\u0026quot; S, 76\u0026deg; 27\u0026apos; 05\u0026quot; W; 225 m.a.s.l.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"30.49738219895288%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e(5)-B145; B146; B147; B151; B152\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"6.935123042505593%\" rowspan=\"3\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eAlto Huallaga\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"9.507829977628635%\" rowspan=\"3\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eTocache\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"15.324384787472036%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eUchiza/Nueva Esperanza\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"18.344519015659955%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eEl Valor\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"16.21923937360179%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e8\u0026deg; 15\u0026apos; 39\u0026quot; S, 76\u0026deg; 33\u0026apos; 59\u0026quot; W, 495 m.a.s.l.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"7.6062639821029085%\" rowspan=\"2\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e15\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"26.062639821029084%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e(7)-B167; B168a; B168b; B169a; B169b; B171a; B172a\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"20.176730486008836%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eUchiza/San Juan de Porongo\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"24.153166421207658%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eEl Valor, Fer\u0026oacute;n\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"21.354933726067745%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e8\u0026deg; 23\u0026apos; 27\u0026quot; S, 76\u0026deg; 17\u0026apos; 17\u0026quot; W, 625 m.a.s.l.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"34.31516936671576%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e(10)-B172b; B175; B176; B177; B178; B188; B189; B190; B191; B192\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"18.340026773761714%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eTocache/San Miguel del Porvenir\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"21.954484605087014%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eFer\u0026oacute;n, Valor\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"19.410977242302543%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e8\u0026deg; 16\u0026apos; 26\u0026quot; S, 76\u0026deg; 32\u0026apos; 25\u0026quot; W; 590 m.a.s.l.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"9.103078982597054%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e15\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"31.191432396251674%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e(4)-B193; B195; B196; B201\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003c/tbody\u003e\n\u003c/table\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003ePhylogeny of the \u003cem\u003erec\u003c/em\u003eA gene:\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eSequencing resulted in partial \u003cem\u003erec\u003c/em\u003eA sequences of 625-667 bp. Based on blast and phylogenetic analyses, they confirmed that the 5 isolates representing the BOX-PCR groups belonged to the species \u003cem\u003eB. vietnamiensis\u003c/em\u003e, with percentages of similarity of the \u003cem\u003erec\u003c/em\u003eA gene between 98.36 and 99.51% with the type strain of \u003cem\u003eB. vietnamiensis\u003c/em\u003e LMG 10929\u003csup\u003eT\u003c/sup\u003e. The maximum likelihood (ML) phylogenetic tree including sequences of the type strain of the genus \u003cem\u003eBurkholderia\u003c/em\u003e sensu stricto is shown in Figure 03. All \u003cem\u003eB. vietnamiensis\u003c/em\u003e sequences clustered in the same highly supported (99%BP) clade. The \u003cem\u003erec\u003c/em\u003eA gene sequences have been deposited in GenBank under the following accession numbers OQ706314-OQ706318.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eFigure 01.\u003c/strong\u003e Fingerprinting dendrogram of similarity based on the BOX-PCR profiles of the isolates of this study, using the UPGMA algorithm and the Jaccard coefficient with 2% tolerance using the online dendrogram construction utility DendroUPGMA (http:// genomes.urv.es/UPGMA/) (Garcia-Vallv\u0026eacute; et al. 1999).\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eGrowth promotion mechanisms detected in \u003cem\u003eBurkholderia vietnamiensis\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAll the strains studied were able to express the direct mechanisms of growth promotion, auxin and siderophore production, phosphate solubilisation and diazotrophic capacity in free life (Table 02), as well as the capacity for antibiosis and antagonism against phytopathogenic rice fungi as indirect growth promotion mechanisms (Table 03). All strains were able to produce auxin in the basal TSB medium (0 \u0026micro;g mL\u003csup\u003e-1\u003c/sup\u003e) and in the TSB media supplemented with tryptophan (100 ppm to 600 ppm). There was also a strong positive correlation between auxin production and tryptophan supplementation in TSB broth (r\u003csup\u003e2\u003c/sup\u003e= 0.99). Under all conditions, \u003cem\u003eB. vietnamiensis\u003c/em\u003e strain B169b produced a significantly higher amount of auxin compared to the other strains.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eFigure 02.\u003c/strong\u003e Maximum-Likelihood phylogenetic tree based on recA gene sequences (650 positions) showing the relationships among phytobeneficial \u003cem\u003eBurkholderia\u003c/em\u003e isolated in this study and closely related species of the genus \u003cem\u003eBurkholderia\u003c/em\u003e sensu stricto. The significance of each branch is indicated by a bootstrap value (as percentage) calculated for 1000 subsets (only values greater than 50 % are indicated). Bar, 5 substitution per 100 nucleotide positions. The recA sequence of \u003cem\u003eBradyrhizobium vignae\u003c/em\u003e 7-2\u003csup\u003eT\u003c/sup\u003e was used as outgroup.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ctable border=\"0\" cellspacing=\"0\" cellpadding=\"0\" width=\"917\"\u003e\n \u003ctbody\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"100%\" colspan=\"15\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eTable 02.\u003c/strong\u003e Direct growth promotion mechanisms evaluated in five endophytic \u003cem\u003eBurkholderia vietnamiensis\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003estrains isolated from rice roots\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"6.2159214830970555%\" rowspan=\"3\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eStrains\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"42.42093784078517%\" colspan=\"5\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eAuxins production (\u0026micro;g mL\u003csup\u003e-1\u003c/sup\u003e)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"1.4176663031624863%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"9.923664122137405%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eSiderophores production\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"1.4176663031624863%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"32.715376226826606%\" colspan=\"5\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003ePhosphate solubilization\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"5.888767720828789%\" rowspan=\"3\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eFree-living nitrogen fixation\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"9.181141439205955%\" rowspan=\"2\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0 ppm\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"9.181141439205955%\" rowspan=\"2\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e100 ppm\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"9.925558312655086%\" rowspan=\"2\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e200 ppm\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"9.925558312655086%\" rowspan=\"2\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e400 ppm\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"9.925558312655086%\" rowspan=\"2\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e600 ppm\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"1.6129032258064515%\"\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"11.290322580645162%\" rowspan=\"2\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eEPS (%)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"1.6129032258064515%\"\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"21.21588089330025%\" colspan=\"2\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003equalitative\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"1.6129032258064515%\"\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"14.516129032258064%\" colspan=\"2\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003equantitative\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"3.9877300613496933%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"3.9877300613496933%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"25.766871165644172%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eSolubilization Index\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"26.380368098159508%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eSolubilization Efficiency\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"3.9877300613496933%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"10.122699386503067%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003epH\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"25.766871165644172%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eSolubilized P (mg PO\u003csub\u003e4\u003c/sub\u003e mL\u003csup\u003e-1\u003c/sup\u003e)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"6.222707423580786%\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003ela1a4\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"8.078602620087336%\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e8.10 (\u0026plusmn;0.15) B\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"8.078602620087336%\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e8.86 (\u0026plusmn;0.21) B\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"8.733624454148472%\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e8.72 (\u0026plusmn;0.16) B\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"8.733624454148472%\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e11.79 (\u0026plusmn;0.35) A\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"8.733624454148472%\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e10.97 (\u0026plusmn;0.20) B\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"1.4192139737991267%\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"9.934497816593886%\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e93.38 (\u0026plusmn;1.85) B\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"1.4192139737991267%\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"9.170305676855895%\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e2.63 (\u0026plusmn;0.04) A\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"9.388646288209607%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e162.73 (\u0026plusmn;3.54) A\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"1.4192139737991267%\"\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"3.6026200873362444%\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e3.89\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"9.170305676855895%\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e11.62 (\u0026plusmn;0.22) A\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"5.895196506550218%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e+\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"6.222707423580786%\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003ela3c3\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"8.078602620087336%\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.25 (\u0026plusmn;0.25) D\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"8.078602620087336%\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.70 (\u0026plusmn;0.03) D\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"8.733624454148472%\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.15 (\u0026plusmn;0.08) D\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"8.733624454148472%\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1.27 (\u0026plusmn;0.10) C\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"8.733624454148472%\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e2.76 (\u0026plusmn;0.05) D\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"1.4192139737991267%\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"9.934497816593886%\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e52.32 (\u0026plusmn;1.18) D\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"1.4192139737991267%\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"9.170305676855895%\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e2.64 (\u0026plusmn;0.03) A\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"9.388646288209607%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e163.88 (\u0026plusmn;3.46) A\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"1.4192139737991267%\"\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"3.6026200873362444%\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e3.93\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"9.170305676855895%\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e12.18 (\u0026plusmn;0.77) A\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"5.895196506550218%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e+\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"6.222707423580786%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eB169b\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"8.078602620087336%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e9.08 (\u0026plusmn;0.07) A\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"8.078602620087336%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e9.70 (\u0026plusmn;0.17) A\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"8.733624454148472%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e13.98 (\u0026plusmn;0.31) A\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"8.733624454148472%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e11.76 (\u0026plusmn;0.07) A\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"8.733624454148472%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e13.90 (\u0026plusmn;0.22) A\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"1.4192139737991267%\"\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"9.934497816593886%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e139.52 (\u0026plusmn;3.30) A\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"1.4192139737991267%\"\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"9.170305676855895%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e2.58 (\u0026plusmn;0.04) A\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"9.388646288209607%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e157.80 (\u0026plusmn;4.33) A\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"1.4192139737991267%\"\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"3.6026200873362444%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e3.81\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"9.170305676855895%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e15.99 (\u0026plusmn;0.58) A\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"5.895196506550218%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e+\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"6.222707423580786%\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eB168a\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"8.078602620087336%\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.10 (\u0026plusmn;0.05) D\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"8.078602620087336%\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1.89 (\u0026plusmn;0.09) C\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"8.733624454148472%\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1.41 (\u0026plusmn;0.05) C\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"8.733624454148472%\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e3.79 (\u0026plusmn;0.10) B\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"8.733624454148472%\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e4.60 (\u0026plusmn;0.44) C\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"1.4192139737991267%\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"9.934497816593886%\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e72.3 (\u0026plusmn;11.91) C\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"1.4192139737991267%\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"9.170305676855895%\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e2.59 (\u0026plusmn;0.04) A\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"9.388646288209607%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e159.31 (\u0026plusmn;3.66) A\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"1.4192139737991267%\"\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"3.6026200873362444%\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e3.84\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"9.170305676855895%\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e15.26 (\u0026plusmn;0.28) A\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"5.895196506550218%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e+\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"6.222707423580786%\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eB171a\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"8.078602620087336%\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e2.82 (\u0026plusmn;0.05) C\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"8.078602620087336%\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1.41 (\u0026plusmn;0.05) C\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"8.733624454148472%\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.62 (\u0026plusmn;0.03) D\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"8.733624454148472%\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e3.30 (\u0026plusmn;0.07) B\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"8.733624454148472%\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e3.33 (\u0026plusmn;0.38) B\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"1.4192139737991267%\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"9.934497816593886%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e47.72 (\u0026plusmn;1.87) DE\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"1.4192139737991267%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"9.170305676855895%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e2.53 (\u0026plusmn;0.01) A\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"9.388646288209607%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e153.25 (\u0026plusmn;0.69) A\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"1.4192139737991267%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"3.6026200873362444%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e3.69\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"9.170305676855895%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e17.63 (\u0026plusmn;0.48) A\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"5.895196506550218%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e+\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"6.222707423580786%\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eC.V (%)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"8.078602620087336%\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e5.94\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"8.078602620087336%\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e5.01\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"8.733624454148472%\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e5.68\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"8.733624454148472%\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e4.76\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"8.733624454148472%\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e7.09\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"1.4192139737991267%\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"9.934497816593886%\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e10.03\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"1.4192139737991267%\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"9.170305676855895%\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e2.65\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"9.388646288209607%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e4.24\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"1.4192139737991267%\"\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"3.6026200873362444%\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e--\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"9.170305676855895%\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e19.30\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"5.895196506550218%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e--\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"100%\" colspan=\"15\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eValues followed by different letters indicate significant differences. Tukey test, p = 0.05.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003c/tbody\u003e\n\u003c/table\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAll strains were efficient in the production of siderophores, forming orange halos around the bacterial colonies of smaller or larger diameter depending on the strain (Figure 03), highlighting \u003cem\u003eB. vietnamiensis\u003c/em\u003e strain B169b as significantly the most efficient strain (139.52%). Regarding phosphate solubilisation, all strains were able to solubilise tricalcium phosphate from NBRIP agar, as evidenced by the appearance of a transparent halo around the bacterial colonies. This activity is reflected in the solubilisation indices and the solubilisation efficiency obtained, although no statistically significant differences were observed between them. The strains also showed no statistically significant differences in the concentration of phosphate released into the culture medium. A negative correlation was observed between the final pH of the culture medium and the difference in soluble phosphate in the culture medium with the white treatment (r\u003csup\u003e2\u003c/sup\u003e= -0.92). Finally, all strains were able to form a subfilm in the semi-solid JMV medium and to grow on the JMV agar, both nitrogen-free, indirectly demonstrating their ability to fix atmospheric nitrogen.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eFigure 03.\u003c/strong\u003e Production of siderophores by \u003cem\u003eBurkholderia vietnamiensis\u003c/em\u003e B168a on CAS agar\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eAntagonism and antibiosis capacity of \u003cem\u003eB. vietnamiensis\u003c/em\u003e strains\u003c/strong\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIn terms of antibiosis capacity, all strains inhibited the growth of the five phytopathogenic fungi, but strain la3c3 showed the greatest antibiosis activity, inhibiting 100% of the growth of \u003cem\u003eR. solani, R. oryzae, N. oryzae\u003c/em\u003e and \u003cem\u003eN. sigmoidea\u003c/em\u003e. All five strains were able to inhibit 100% of the growth of \u003cem\u003eN. oryzae\u003c/em\u003e, the most susceptible phytopathogenic fungus, while the least susceptible was \u003cem\u003eRhizoctonia oryzae-sativae\u003c/em\u003e, with radial growth inhibition ranging from 76.47% (la1a4) to 86.04% (B171a) (Table 03 and Figure 04).\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ctable border=\"0\" cellspacing=\"0\" cellpadding=\"0\" width=\"596\"\u003e\n \u003ctbody\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"100%\" colspan=\"6\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eTable 03.\u003c/strong\u003e Antibiosis and antagonism of five strains of \u003cem\u003eBurkholderia vietnamiensis\u003c/em\u003e on five species of rice phytopathogenic fungi.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"7.885906040268456%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eStrains\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"17.28187919463087%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eRhizoctonia solani\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e(RS1)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"17.78523489932886%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eRhizoctonia oryzae\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e(RO1)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"20.302013422818792%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eRhizoctonia oryzae-sativae\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e(ROS1)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"17.114093959731544%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eNigrospora oryzae\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e(NO1)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"19.630872483221477%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eNakataea sigmoidea\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e(NS1)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"100%\" colspan=\"6\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eANTIBIOTIC (%)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"7.885906040268456%\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eB168a\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"17.28187919463087%\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e78.59 (\u0026plusmn;0.12) C\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"17.78523489932886%\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e100.00 (\u0026plusmn;0.00) A\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"20.302013422818792%\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e82.23 (\u0026plusmn;1.94) AB\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"17.114093959731544%\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e100.00 (\u0026plusmn;0.00) A\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"19.630872483221477%\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e100.00 (\u0026plusmn;0.00) A\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"7.885906040268456%\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eB171a\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"17.28187919463087%\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e100.00 (\u0026plusmn;0.00) A\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"17.78523489932886%\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e100.00 (\u0026plusmn;0.00) A\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"20.302013422818792%\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e86.04 (\u0026plusmn;0.35) A\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"17.114093959731544%\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e100.00 (\u0026plusmn;0.00) A\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"19.630872483221477%\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e90.86 (\u0026plusmn;0.24) B\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"7.885906040268456%\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eB169b\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"17.28187919463087%\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e100.00 (\u0026plusmn;0.00) A\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"17.78523489932886%\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e77.93 (\u0026plusmn;2.04) B\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"20.302013422818792%\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e79.72 (\u0026plusmn;1.53) BC\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"17.114093959731544%\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e100.00 (\u0026plusmn;0.00) A\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"19.630872483221477%\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e87.80 (\u0026plusmn;0.50) C\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"7.885906040268456%\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003ela3c3\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"17.28187919463087%\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e100.00 (\u0026plusmn;0.00) A\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"17.78523489932886%\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e100.00 (\u0026plusmn;0.00) A\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"20.302013422818792%\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e84.82 (\u0026plusmn;0.69) A\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"17.114093959731544%\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e100.00 (\u0026plusmn;0.00) A\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"19.630872483221477%\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e100.00 (\u0026plusmn;0.00) A\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"7.885906040268456%\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003ela1a4\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"17.28187919463087%\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e80.39 (\u0026plusmn;0.61) B\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"17.78523489932886%\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e75.80 (\u0026plusmn;3.49) B\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"20.302013422818792%\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e76.47 (\u0026plusmn;0.80) C\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"17.114093959731544%\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e100.00 (\u0026plusmn;0.00) A\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"19.630872483221477%\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e100.00 (\u0026plusmn;0.00) A\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"7.885906040268456%\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eC.V(%)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"17.28187919463087%\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.39\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"17.78523489932886%\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e3.45\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"20.302013422818792%\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e2.56\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"17.114093959731544%\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"19.630872483221477%\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.45\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"100%\" colspan=\"6\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eANTAGONISM (%)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"7.885906040268456%\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eB168a\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"17.28187919463087%\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e56.22 (\u0026plusmn;2.60) A\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"17.78523489932886%\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e59.03 (\u0026plusmn;2.36) A\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"20.302013422818792%\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e73.85 (\u0026plusmn;5.87) A\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"17.114093959731544%\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e41.98 (\u0026plusmn;1.92) A\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"19.630872483221477%\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e73.63 (\u0026plusmn;1.46) A\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"7.885906040268456%\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eB171a\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"17.28187919463087%\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e61.20 (\u0026plusmn;2.64) A\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"17.78523489932886%\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e57.54 (\u0026plusmn;1.47) A\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"20.302013422818792%\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e54.39 (\u0026plusmn;5.27) B\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"17.114093959731544%\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e44.96 (\u0026plusmn;1.20) A\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"19.630872483221477%\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e72.79 (\u0026plusmn;2.00) A\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"7.885906040268456%\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eB169b\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"17.28187919463087%\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e58.71 (\u0026plusmn;1.00) A\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"17.78523489932886%\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e55.06 (\u0026plusmn;2.27) A\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"20.302013422818792%\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e65.87 (\u0026plusmn;2.89) AB\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"17.114093959731544%\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e47.50 (\u0026plusmn;3.07) A\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"19.630872483221477%\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e77.56 (\u0026plusmn;1.45) A\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"7.885906040268456%\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003ela3c3\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"17.28187919463087%\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e64.68 (\u0026plusmn;2.13) A\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"17.78523489932886%\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e61.51 (\u0026plusmn;0.99) A\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"20.302013422818792%\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e64.87 (\u0026plusmn;2.00) AB\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"17.114093959731544%\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e44.72 (\u0026plusmn;1.61) A\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"19.630872483221477%\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e59.94 (\u0026plusmn;0.92) B\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"7.885906040268456%\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003ela1a4\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"17.28187919463087%\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e56.22 (\u0026plusmn;1.42) A\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"17.78523489932886%\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e57.54 (\u0026plusmn;0.99) A\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"20.302013422818792%\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e61.87 (\u0026plusmn;2.40) AB\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"17.114093959731544%\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e49.21 (\u0026plusmn;3.17) A\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"19.630872483221477%\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e63.75 (\u0026plusmn;2.73) B\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"7.885906040268456%\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eC.V(%)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"17.28187919463087%\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e8.52\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"17.78523489932886%\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e7.26\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"20.302013422818792%\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e15.3\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"17.114093959731544%\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e12.5\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"19.630872483221477%\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e6.4\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"100%\" colspan=\"6\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eValues followed by different letters indicate significant differences. Tukey test, p = 0.05.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003c/tbody\u003e\n\u003c/table\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAll strains inhibited the growth of the five phytopathogenic fungi, with strain B169b showing the highest range of antagonistic capacity against the five phytopathogenic fungi. The most susceptible fungus was \u003cem\u003eN. sigmoidea\u003c/em\u003e with a range of 59.94% (la3c3) to 77.56% (B169b) antagonism and the least susceptible was \u003cem\u003eN. oryzae\u003c/em\u003e with a range of 41.98% (B168a) to 49.21% (la1a4) growth inhibition. (Table 03 and Figure 04).\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAll \u003cem\u003eB. vietnamiensis\u003c/em\u003e strains increased length, germination and vigour index in both rice cultivars under gnotobiotic conditions, although there was no clear significant difference among isolates. While there were significant differences between the strains for root length in the LE cultivar, we found none for LC. The same result was observed for the length of aerial parts. The highest growth promotion effects compared to the uninoculated reached 50% and 35.6% for root length (LE/B169b and LC/lac3c, respectively) and 32.2% and 33.4% for shoot length (LE/B168a and LC/B168a, respectively).\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAll inoculation conditions resulted in a significant increase in the total length or vigour index of the plant, irrespective of the cultivar, but with no significant difference between the cultivars. (Table 04). While the germination rate differed between the two varieties (p\u0026lt;0.04), the effects of inoculation on this rate were highly significant compared to the uninoculated conditions (p\u0026lt;0.003), with a higher germination rate for inoculated seeds.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eFigure 04\u003c/strong\u003e. Evaluation of antagonism (A) and antibiosis (B) in five strains of \u003cem\u003eBurkholderia vietnamiensis\u003c/em\u003e against five strains of phytopathogenic rice fungi, RS1 (\u003cem\u003eRhizoctonia solani\u003c/em\u003e), ROS1 (\u003cem\u003eRhizoctonia oryzae-sativae\u003c/em\u003e), RO1 (\u003cem\u003eRhizoctonia oryzae\u003c/em\u003e), NS1 (\u003cem\u003eNakataea sigmoidea\u003c/em\u003e) and NO1 (\u003cem\u003eNigrospora oryzae\u003c/em\u003e)\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ctable border=\"0\" cellspacing=\"0\" cellpadding=\"0\" width=\"898\"\u003e\n \u003ctbody\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"100%\" colspan=\"16\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eTable 04.\u003c/strong\u003e Evaluation of the vigor index of two rice varieties inoculated with five strains of \u003cem\u003eBurkholderia vietnamiensis\u003c/em\u003e grown under gnotobiotic conditions.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"8.453837597330367%\" rowspan=\"2\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eStrains\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"21.023359288097886%\" colspan=\"4\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eRL\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"18.909899888765295%\" colspan=\"2\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eSL\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"18.46496106785317%\" colspan=\"4\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eTL\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"8.565072302558399%\" colspan=\"3\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eGermination\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"24.582869855394883%\" colspan=\"2\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eVigor Index\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"13.24422843256379%\" colspan=\"2\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eLE\u003csup\u003e1\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"9.720534629404618%\" colspan=\"2\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eLC\u003csup\u003e1\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"10.328068043742405%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eLE\u003csup\u003e1\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"10.328068043742405%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eLC\u003csup\u003e1\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"10.08505467800729%\" colspan=\"2\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eLE\u003csup\u003e1\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"10.08505467800729%\" colspan=\"2\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eLC\u003csup\u003e1\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"4.860267314702309%\" colspan=\"2\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eLE\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"4.495747266099635%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eLC\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"13.365735115431349%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eLE\u003csup\u003e1\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"13.487241798298907%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eLC\u003csup\u003e1\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"8.453837597330367%\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003ela1a4\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"10.567296996662959%\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e58.63 (\u0026plusmn;1.42) DE\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"9.454949944382648%\" colspan=\"2\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e60.41 (\u0026plusmn;0.92) A\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"10.456062291434927%\" colspan=\"2\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e38.16 (\u0026plusmn;1.42) C\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"10.567296996662959%\" colspan=\"2\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e45.36 (\u0026plusmn;1.09) A\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"9.566184649610678%\" colspan=\"2\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e94.40 (\u0026plusmn;2.57) B\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"9.454949944382648%\" colspan=\"2\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e105.77 (\u0026plusmn;1.71) A\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"2.7808676307007785%\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e98\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"4.115684093437152%\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e98\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"12.235817575083425%\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e8582.06 (\u0026plusmn;199.35) B\u003csup\u003eb\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"12.347052280311457%\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e10365.66 (\u0026plusmn;194.20) A\u003csup\u003ea\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"8.453837597330367%\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003ela3c3\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"10.567296996662959%\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e68.13 (\u0026plusmn;1.02) C\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"9.454949944382648%\" colspan=\"2\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e60.52 (\u0026plusmn;2.19) A\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"10.456062291434927%\" colspan=\"2\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e44.97 (\u0026plusmn;0.94) AB\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"10.567296996662959%\" colspan=\"2\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e44.73 (\u0026plusmn;2.25) A\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"9.566184649610678%\" colspan=\"2\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e112.71 (\u0026plusmn;2.02) A\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"9.454949944382648%\" colspan=\"2\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e105.25 (\u0026plusmn;3.54) A\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"2.7808676307007785%\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e100\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"4.115684093437152%\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e94\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"12.235817575083425%\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e11310.27 (\u0026plusmn;193.25) A\u003csup\u003ea\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"12.347052280311457%\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e9892.84 (\u0026plusmn;414.10) A\u003csup\u003eb\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"8.453837597330367%\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eB169b\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"10.567296996662959%\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e75.27 (\u0026plusmn;1.97) A\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"9.454949944382648%\" colspan=\"2\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e58.74 (\u0026plusmn;1.88) A\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"10.456062291434927%\" colspan=\"2\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e44.22 (\u0026plusmn;1.23) B\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"10.567296996662959%\" colspan=\"2\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e44.20 (\u0026plusmn;1.46) A\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"9.566184649610678%\" colspan=\"2\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e115.18 (\u0026plusmn;2.79) A\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"9.454949944382648%\" colspan=\"2\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e102.94 (\u0026plusmn;3.18) A\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"2.7808676307007785%\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e96\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"4.115684093437152%\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e94\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"12.235817575083425%\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e11470.50 (\u0026plusmn;305.63) A\u003csup\u003ea\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"12.347052280311457%\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e9675.80 (\u0026plusmn;308.90) A\u003csup\u003eb\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"8.453837597330367%\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eB168a\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"10.567296996662959%\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e65.22 (\u0026plusmn;1.62) CD\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"9.454949944382648%\" colspan=\"2\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e58.79 (\u0026plusmn;1.52) A\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"10.456062291434927%\" colspan=\"2\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e49.75 (\u0026plusmn;1.33) A\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"10.567296996662959%\" colspan=\"2\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e45.62 (\u0026plusmn;2.20) A\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"9.566184649610678%\" colspan=\"2\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e111.12 (\u0026plusmn;2.01) A\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"9.454949944382648%\" colspan=\"2\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e104.41 (\u0026plusmn;4.09) A\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"2.7808676307007785%\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e100\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"4.115684093437152%\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e96\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"12.235817575083425%\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e11496.67 (\u0026plusmn;294.38) A\u003csup\u003ea\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"12.347052280311457%\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e10023.49 (\u0026plusmn;355.84) A\u003csup\u003eb\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"8.453837597330367%\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eB171a\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"10.567296996662959%\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e72.8 (\u0026plusmn;1.80) B\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"9.454949944382648%\" colspan=\"2\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e57.89 (\u0026plusmn;1.43) A\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"10.456062291434927%\" colspan=\"2\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e43.47 (\u0026plusmn;0.96) B\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"10.567296996662959%\" colspan=\"2\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e42.65 (\u0026plusmn;1.40) A\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"9.566184649610678%\" colspan=\"2\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e112.08 (\u0026plusmn;2.26) A\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"9.454949944382648%\" colspan=\"2\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e100.54 (\u0026plusmn;2.49) A\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"2.7808676307007785%\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e100\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"4.115684093437152%\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e94\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"12.235817575083425%\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e11626.93 (\u0026plusmn;272.51) A\u003csup\u003ea\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"12.347052280311457%\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e9450.57 (\u0026plusmn;264.82) A\u003csup\u003eb\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"8.453837597330367%\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003ePriestia megaterium\u003c/em\u003e SMBH14-02\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"10.567296996662959%\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e67.81 (\u0026plusmn;0.82) CD\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"9.454949944382648%\" colspan=\"2\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e60.68 (\u0026plusmn;1.31) A\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"10.456062291434927%\" colspan=\"2\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e42.28 (\u0026plusmn;0.91) BC\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"10.567296996662959%\" colspan=\"2\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e40.36 (\u0026plusmn;1.10) AB\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"9.566184649610678%\" colspan=\"2\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e108.21 (\u0026plusmn;1.60) A\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"9.454949944382648%\" colspan=\"2\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e101.04 (\u0026plusmn;2.16) A\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"2.7808676307007785%\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e100\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"4.115684093437152%\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e100\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"12.235817575083425%\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e11008.73 (\u0026plusmn;172.29) A\u003csup\u003ea\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"12.347052280311457%\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e10103.97 (\u0026plusmn;236.04) A\u003csup\u003eb\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"8.453837597330367%\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eNon-inoculated control\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"10.567296996662959%\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e49.97 (\u0026plusmn;1.11) E\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"9.454949944382648%\" colspan=\"2\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e44.63 (\u0026plusmn;1.19) B\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"10.456062291434927%\" colspan=\"2\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e37.61 (\u0026plusmn;0.70) DE\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"10.567296996662959%\" colspan=\"2\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e34.19 (\u0026plusmn;1.22) B\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"9.566184649610678%\" colspan=\"2\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e88.32 (\u0026plusmn;1.59) B\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"9.454949944382648%\" colspan=\"2\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e78.82 (\u0026plusmn;2.01) B\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"2.7808676307007785%\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e92\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"4.115684093437152%\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e84\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"12.235817575083425%\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e8235.35 (\u0026plusmn;176.77) B\u003csup\u003ea\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"12.347052280311457%\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e6620.43 (\u0026plusmn;201.69) B\u003csup\u003eb\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"8.453837597330367%\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eCV (%)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"12.124582869855395%\" colspan=\"2\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e12.13\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"8.898776418242491%\" colspan=\"2\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e14.73\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"9.454949944382648%\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e14.83\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"9.454949944382648%\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e20.63\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"9.232480533926585%\" colspan=\"2\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e11.17\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"9.232480533926585%\" colspan=\"2\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e15.76\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"4.4493882091212456%\" colspan=\"2\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"4.115684093437152%\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"12.235817575083425%\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e12.31\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"12.347052280311457%\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e16.94\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"100%\" colspan=\"16\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eValues followed by different uppercase letters indicate significant differences between strains, and values followed by different lowercase superscript letters indicate significant differences between cultivars.\u003cbr\u003e\u0026nbsp;RL: Root length; SL: Aerial part length; TL: Total length of the plant; LE: INIA 507 \u0026ldquo;La Esperanza\u0026rdquo; rice cultivar; LC: INIA 510 \u0026quot;La Conquista\u0026quot; rice cultivar\u003cbr\u003e\u003csup\u003e1\u003c/sup\u003eKruskal Wallis test, p = 0.05.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003c/tbody\u003e\n\u003c/table\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ctable border=\"0\" cellspacing=\"0\" cellpadding=\"0\" width=\"992\"\u003e\n \u003ctbody\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"100%\" colspan=\"10\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eTable 05.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003eEvaluation of growth promotion of two rice varieties inoculated with five strains of \u003cem\u003eBurkholderia vietnamiensis\u003c/em\u003e grown for 21 days under gnotobiotic conditions.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"10.181451612903226%\" colspan=\"2\" rowspan=\"2\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eParameter\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"57.45967741935484%\" colspan=\"5\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eBurkholderia vietnamiensis\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"14.314516129032258%\" rowspan=\"2\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003ePriestia megaterium\u003c/em\u003e SMBH14-02\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"13.306451612903226%\" rowspan=\"2\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eNon-inoculated control\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"4.737903225806452%\" rowspan=\"2\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eCV (%)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"18.771929824561404%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003ela1a4\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"19.82456140350877%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003ela3c3\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"21.57894736842105%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eB169b\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"18.24561403508772%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eB168a\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"21.57894736842105%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eB171a\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"6.760847628657921%\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eRL-LE\u003csup\u003e2\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"3.3299697275479314%\" rowspan=\"6\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003emm.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"10.797174571140262%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e103.89 (\u0026plusmn;3.22) B\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"11.402623612512613%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e103.90 (\u0026plusmn;5.02) B\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"12.411705348133198%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e115.78 (\u0026plusmn;5.15) B\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"10.494450050454088%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e142.04 (\u0026plusmn;1.90) A\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"12.411705348133198%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e116.04 (\u0026plusmn;2.98) B\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"14.32896064581231%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e106.10 (\u0026plusmn;7.64) B\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"13.319878910191726%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e97.51 (\u0026plusmn;2.98) B\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"4.74268415741675%\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e13.28\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"6.993736951983299%\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eRL-LC\u003csup\u003e2\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"11.169102296450939%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e73.94 (\u0026plusmn;4.94) AB\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"11.795407098121085%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e77.36 (\u0026plusmn;4.83) AB\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"12.839248434237996%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e79.68 (\u0026plusmn;3.04) A\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"10.855949895615867%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e82.93 (\u0026plusmn;3.00) A\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"12.839248434237996%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e88.55 (\u0026plusmn;2.14) A\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"14.822546972860126%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e81.77 (\u0026plusmn;1.64) A\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"13.778705636743215%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e63.86 (\u0026plusmn;3.10) B\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"4.906054279749478%\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e13.90\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"6.993736951983299%\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eSL-LE\u003csup\u003e2\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"11.169102296450939%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e167.64 (\u0026plusmn;2.59) B\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"11.795407098121085%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e192.27 (\u0026plusmn;3.76) A\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"12.839248434237996%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e175.77 (\u0026plusmn;4.91) AB\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"10.855949895615867%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e121.85 (\u0026plusmn;2.72) C\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"12.839248434237996%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e169.79 (\u0026plusmn;4.50) B\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"14.822546972860126%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e172.00 (\u0026plusmn;7.61) B\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"13.778705636743215%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e159.81 (\u0026plusmn;2.68) B\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"4.906054279749478%\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e8.47\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"6.993736951983299%\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eSL-LC\u003csup\u003e1\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"11.169102296450939%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e196.73 (\u0026plusmn;5.44) AB\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"11.795407098121085%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e201.12 (\u0026plusmn;7.77) AB\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"12.839248434237996%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e195.07 (\u0026plusmn;3.84) AB\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"10.855949895615867%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e211.53 (\u0026plusmn;4.89) A\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"12.839248434237996%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e199.70 (\u0026plusmn;3.27) AB\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"14.822546972860126%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e205.49 (\u0026plusmn;5.23) AB\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"13.778705636743215%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e180.50 (\u0026plusmn;9.57) B\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"4.906054279749478%\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e9.67\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"6.993736951983299%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eTL-LE\u003csup\u003e1\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"11.169102296450939%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e268.29 (\u0026plusmn;3.42) ABC\u003csup\u003ea\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"11.795407098121085%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e285.26 (\u0026plusmn;5.30) Ab\u003csup\u003ea\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"12.839248434237996%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e288.06 (\u0026plusmn;8.96) A\u003csup\u003ea\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"10.855949895615867%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e258.98 (\u0026plusmn;4.28) BC\u003csup\u003eb\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"12.839248434237996%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e281.65 (\u0026plusmn;5.50) A\u003csup\u003ea\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"14.822546972860126%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e263.82 (\u0026plusmn;8.74) ABC\u003csup\u003eb\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"13.778705636743215%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e251.13 (\u0026plusmn;4.81) C\u003csup\u003ea\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"4.906054279749478%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e7.22\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"6.993736951983299%\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eTL-LC\u003csup\u003e2\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"11.169102296450939%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e275.69 (\u0026plusmn;8.02) A\u003csup\u003ea\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"11.795407098121085%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e281.12 (\u0026plusmn;10.43) A\u003csup\u003ea\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"12.839248434237996%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e265.25 (\u0026plusmn;5.17) A\u003csup\u003eb\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"10.855949895615867%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e289.96 (\u0026plusmn;8.96) A\u003csup\u003ea\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"12.839248434237996%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e284.90 (\u0026plusmn;4.73) A\u003csup\u003ea\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"14.822546972860126%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e290.04 (\u0026plusmn;4.63) A\u003csup\u003ea\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"13.778705636743215%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e232.43 (\u0026plusmn;13.65) B\u003csup\u003ea\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"4.906054279749478%\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e9.41\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"6.760847628657921%\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eRDW-LE\u003csup\u003e2\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"3.3299697275479314%\" rowspan=\"6\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003emg\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"10.797174571140262%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e11.27 (\u0026plusmn;0.18) A\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"11.402623612512613%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e11.35 (\u0026plusmn;0.29) A\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"12.411705348133198%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e11.28 (\u0026plusmn;0.40) AB\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"10.494450050454088%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e11.25 (\u0026plusmn;6.05) A\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"12.411705348133198%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e11.57 (\u0026plusmn;0.20) A\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"14.32896064581231%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e9.81 (\u0026plusmn;0.27) B\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"13.319878910191726%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e9.31 (\u0026plusmn;0.18) B\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"4.74268415741675%\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e7.84\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"6.993736951983299%\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eRDW-LC\u003csup\u003e1\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"11.169102296450939%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e10.58 (\u0026plusmn;0.32) A\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"11.795407098121085%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e9.98 (\u0026plusmn;0.30) ABC\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"12.839248434237996%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e10.01 (\u0026plusmn;0.27) ABC\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"10.855949895615867%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e10.56 (\u0026plusmn;0.19) AB\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"12.839248434237996%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e11.21 (\u0026plusmn;0.26) A\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"14.822546972860126%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e9.69 (\u0026plusmn;0.47) BC\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"13.778705636743215%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e8.77 (\u0026plusmn;0.20) C\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"4.906054279749478%\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e9.36\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"6.993736951983299%\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eSDW-LE\u003csup\u003e2\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"11.169102296450939%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e16.85 (\u0026plusmn;0.61) AB\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"11.795407098121085%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e17.55 (\u0026plusmn;0.34) AB\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"12.839248434237996%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e17.69 (\u0026plusmn;0.60) AB\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"10.855949895615867%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e16.47 (\u0026plusmn;0.81) B\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"12.839248434237996%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e19.20 (\u0026plusmn;0.64) A\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"14.822546972860126%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e13.37 (\u0026plusmn;0.48) C\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"13.778705636743215%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e13.39 (\u0026plusmn;0.35) C\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"4.906054279749478%\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e11.01\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"6.993736951983299%\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eSDW-LC\u003csup\u003e1\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"11.169102296450939%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e14.79 (\u0026plusmn;0.54) AB\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"11.795407098121085%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e13.95 (\u0026plusmn;0.91) ABC\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"12.839248434237996%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e14.36 (\u0026plusmn;0.41) ABC\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"10.855949895615867%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e13.78 (\u0026plusmn;0.34) ABC\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"12.839248434237996%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e16.47 (\u0026plusmn;0.75) A\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"14.822546972860126%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e12.60 (\u0026plusmn;0.49) BC\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"13.778705636743215%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e11.68 (\u0026plusmn;0.86) C\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"4.906054279749478%\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e14.76\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"6.993736951983299%\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eTDW-LE\u003csup\u003e2\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"11.169102296450939%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e27.85 (\u0026plusmn;0.68) A\u003csup\u003ea\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"11.795407098121085%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e28.61 (\u0026plusmn;0.50) A\u003csup\u003ea\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"12.839248434237996%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e28.78 (\u0026plusmn;1.04) A\u003csup\u003ea\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"10.855949895615867%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e27.47 (\u0026plusmn;0.90) A\u003csup\u003ea\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"12.839248434237996%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e30.49 (\u0026plusmn;2.54) A\u003csup\u003ea\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"14.822546972860126%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e22.47 (\u0026plusmn;0.75) B\u003csup\u003ea\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"13.778705636743215%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e23.05 (\u0026plusmn;0.49) B\u003csup\u003ea\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"4.906054279749478%\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e8.91\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"6.993736951983299%\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eTDW-LC\u003csup\u003e1\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"11.169102296450939%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e24.62 (\u0026plusmn;0.43) AB\u003csup\u003eb\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"11.795407098121085%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e22.16 (\u0026plusmn;0.61) BC\u003csup\u003eb\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"12.839248434237996%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e23.44 (\u0026plusmn;0.43) AB\u003csup\u003ea\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"10.855949895615867%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e24.72 (\u0026plusmn;0.72) AB\u003csup\u003eb\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"12.839248434237996%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e26.20 (\u0026plusmn;1.01) A\u003csup\u003eb\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"14.822546972860126%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e22.73 (\u0026plusmn;0.62) BC\u003csup\u003ea\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"13.778705636743215%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e20.44 (\u0026plusmn;0.59) C\u003csup\u003eb\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"4.906054279749478%\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e8.84\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"6.760847628657921%\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e% NPA-LE\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"3.3299697275479314%\" rowspan=\"6\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e%\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"10.797174571140262%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e4.91\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"11.402623612512613%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e5.67\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"12.411705348133198%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e4.21\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"10.494450050454088%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e4.64\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"12.411705348133198%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e4.76\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"14.32896064581231%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e4.56\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"13.319878910191726%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e4.29\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"4.74268415741675%\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e---\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"6.993736951983299%\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e%NPA-LC\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"11.169102296450939%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e4.63\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"11.795407098121085%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e4.87\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"12.839248434237996%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e5.03\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"10.855949895615867%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e4.06\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"12.839248434237996%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e6.24\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"14.822546972860126%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e4.39\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"13.778705636743215%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e4.18\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"4.906054279749478%\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e---\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"6.993736951983299%\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e% NPR-LE\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"11.169102296450939%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1.80\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"11.795407098121085%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1.29\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"12.839248434237996%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1.39\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"10.855949895615867%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1.31\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"12.839248434237996%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1.76\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"14.822546972860126%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1.34\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"13.778705636743215%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1.05\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"4.906054279749478%\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e---\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"6.993736951983299%\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e% NPR-LC\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"11.169102296450939%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1.54\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"11.795407098121085%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1.31\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"12.839248434237996%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1.44\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"10.855949895615867%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1.78\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"12.839248434237996%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.93\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"14.822546972860126%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1.25\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"13.778705636743215%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1.54\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"4.906054279749478%\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e---\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"6.993736951983299%\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e%NT-LE\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"11.169102296450939%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e6.70\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"11.795407098121085%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e6.96\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"12.839248434237996%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e5.60\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"10.855949895615867%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e5.95\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"12.839248434237996%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e6.52\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"14.822546972860126%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e5.90\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"13.778705636743215%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e5.34\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"4.906054279749478%\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e---\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"6.993736951983299%\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e%NT-LC\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"11.169102296450939%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e6.17\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"11.795407098121085%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e6.19\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"12.839248434237996%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e6.46\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"10.855949895615867%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e5.83\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"12.839248434237996%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e7.17\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"14.822546972860126%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e5.64\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"13.778705636743215%\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e5.71\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"4.906054279749478%\" valign=\"bottom\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e---\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd width=\"100%\" colspan=\"10\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eValues followed by different capital letters indicate significant differences and values followed by different lowercase superscript letters indicate significant differences between cultivars. RL: Root length; SL: Shoot part length; TL: Total length of the plant; RDW: Root dry weight; SDW: Shoot dry weight; TDW: Total dry weight; %NPA: Percentage of nitrogen in the aerial part; %NPR: Percentage of nitrogen in root part; %NT: Percentage of total nitrogen. LE: INIA 507 \u0026ldquo;La Esperanza\u0026rdquo; rice cultivar; LC: INIA 510 Cultivate \u0026ldquo;La Conquista\u0026rdquo; \u003csup\u003e1\u003c/sup\u003eTukey test, p = 0.05; \u003csup\u003e2\u003c/sup\u003eKruskal Wallis test, p = 0.05.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003c/tbody\u003e\n\u003c/table\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eFinally, in the 21-day test, there was no significant difference between the strains of \u003cem\u003eB. vietnamiensis\u003c/em\u003e with \u003cem\u003eP. megaterium\u003c/em\u003e SMBH14-02 for length, dry weight and nitrogen accumulation. Similarly, non-significant differences were observed in the accumulation of TDW inoculated with \u003cem\u003eB. vietnamiensis\u003c/em\u003e strains in the LC cultivar. Differences were observed in the accumulation of total nitrogen, which was higher in the LE cultivar inoculated with \u003cem\u003eB. vietnamiensis\u003c/em\u003e la3c3 (6.96%) and with \u003cem\u003eB. vietnamiensis\u003c/em\u003e B171a (7.17%) in the LC cultivar (Table 05).\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Discussion","content":"\u003cp\u003eEndophytic bacteria are an important part of the phytomicrobiome, not only because they represent a selected fraction of the soil microbiota, but also because of the growth-promoting mechanisms they express in close association with plants, especially in the Poaceae family. There are several reports of bacteria being selected for their endophytic character and also for their diazotrophic capacity in rice cultivation (Ji et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR43\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2014\u003c/span\u003e; de Oliveira et al. 2015; Shabanamol et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR83\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2018\u003c/span\u003e; Banik et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR12\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2019\u003c/span\u003e; Madhaiyan et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR61\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2021\u003c/span\u003e; Kuang et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR51\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2024\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eDe Oliveira et al. (2015), in a bioprospecting study of diazotrophic endophytic bacteria in the rice cultivar BRS Tropical, reported that 18% of the isolates obtained were similar to those in the genus \u003cem\u003eBurkholderia\u003c/em\u003e, and diverse species of \u003cem\u003eBurkholderia\u003c/em\u003e have been repeatedly isolated from healthy rice roots (see Wallner et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR100\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2023\u003c/span\u003e and refins). In our study, the proportion of \u003cem\u003eBurkholderia\u003c/em\u003e was much lower (5.26%) and was isolated only from the rice variety \"El valor\", grown in the Alto Huallaga valley. It cannot be excluded that the primers used for the detection of \u003cem\u003eBurkholderia\u003c/em\u003e missed some isolates and did not amplify them. However, when searching the complete or draft genomes of \u003cem\u003eB. vietnamiensis\u003c/em\u003e available in NCBI, we did not find any example of genomes (among the 208 genomes available) where the primers would not have amplified the \u003cem\u003erec\u003c/em\u003eA fragment. This explanation therefore seems unlikely. The low frequency of \u003cem\u003eBurkholderia\u003c/em\u003e isolates in our study could also be due to the selection of isolates for which we attempted to amplify a \u003cem\u003erec\u003c/em\u003eA fragment. We focused on isolates that could fix nitrogen because all previous studies and available genomes have shown that \u003cem\u003eB. vietnamiensis\u003c/em\u003e strains are free-living nitrogen fixers. This choice may have excluded some other \u003cem\u003eBurkholderia\u003c/em\u003e species that are not free-living nitrogen fixers, thus reducing the number of \u003cem\u003eBurkholderia\u003c/em\u003e isolates, although several have been shown to act as plant-associated nitrogen fixers (Estrada de los Santos et al. 2001). Finally, the low frequency of \u003cem\u003eB. vietnamiensis\u003c/em\u003e isolates in our sampling may simply reflect their low frequency in soil, although this species has been shown to be frequently recovered from rice roots in different geographical locations, and although \u003cem\u003eBurkholderia\u003c/em\u003e s. l. is a highly conserved microbial group of the endophytic microbiota in rice, regardless of soil type and cultivar (Samuel et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR80\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2023\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eQuite surprisingly, the box PCR profiles showed diversity among the different isolates and among the four recovered in this study. One might have expected, or feared, that a very small number of isolates recovered from a single site would end up as a single identical clone, which is not the case, since we detected at least three different profiles (together with the two other strains isolated in a previous study, but from a different site in Peru). The \u003cem\u003erec\u003c/em\u003eA gene, as a reliable phylogenetic marker for assigning taxonomic identity within the genus \u003cem\u003eBurkholderia\u003c/em\u003e (Payne et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR71\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2005\u003c/span\u003e; Spilker et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR90\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2009\u003c/span\u003e; Bach et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR8\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2017\u003c/span\u003e; Depoorter et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR20\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2020\u003c/span\u003e; Velez et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR98\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2023\u003c/span\u003e; Valdez-Nu\u0026ntilde;ez et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR97\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2024\u003c/span\u003e), confirmed that the 4 strains we isolated belonged to the species \u003cem\u003eB. vietnamiensis\u003c/em\u003e, but showed less diversity than the Box-PCR approach (as expected). In fact, the 3 representative isolates of the 3 groups showed the same \u003cem\u003erec\u003c/em\u003eA sequences, while the other 2 showed 2 nucleotide differences with our isolates. The Box-PCR diversity, with 3 different profiles among the 4 isolates obtained, however suggests that we may indeed have missed some \u003cem\u003eB. vietnamiensis\u003c/em\u003e diversity in our sampling and that we should possibly intensify our efforts to recover more isolates.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eBased on these results and the genetic differences detected between the isolates, we expected some discrepancies in their growth promoting abilities.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eWhile several studies have previously demonstrated beneficial effects of \u003cem\u003eB. vietnamiensis\u003c/em\u003e on rice growth and possibly protection against pathogens, we investigated whether and how these strains might actually play a role as growth promoters. Among bacterial auxins, indoleacetic acid (IAA) is one of the most studied, influencing root architecture, nutrient uptake and tolerance to abiotic factors. Bacterial IAA concentrations are influenced by intrinsic factors such as strain type, presence of complete biosynthetic pathway genes, or extrinsic factors such as precursor concentration, pH, carbon source, among others (Etesami and Glick, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR29\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2024\u003c/span\u003e). It has been reported that IAA production is common in plant-associated strains of \u003cem\u003eB. vietnamiensis\u003c/em\u003e (Govindarajan et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR37\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2006\u003c/span\u003e; Xin et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR103\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2009\u003c/span\u003e; Estrada et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR26\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2013\u003c/span\u003e; de Oliveira et al. 2015; R\u0026iacute;os-Ruiz et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR75\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2020\u003c/span\u003e; Shinjo et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR86\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2020\u003c/span\u003e; Nguyen et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR59\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2022\u003c/span\u003e). Our results showed that there is a wide range of variation in auxin production among our isolates. At 600 ppm L-tryptophan, strain B169b produced 5 times more auxin than strain la3c3 (13.90 vs 2.76 \u0026micro;g mL-1). Most of the auxin found in the rhizosphere is believed to come from the biosynthesis by microorganisms (Kamilova et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR45\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2006\u003c/span\u003e). Variations in auxin production between strains present in the rhizosphere can therefore have a major impact on plant development, and, from the point of view of artificial inoculation, our results proved that there is a basis for bacterial selection of the most productive strains.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cem\u003eB. vietnamiensis\u003c/em\u003e is also characterised by the production of siderophores (Gillis et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR36\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1995\u003c/span\u003e; Meyer et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR64\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1995\u003c/span\u003e; Conway and Greenberg, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR17\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2002\u003c/span\u003e; Nguyen et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR59\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2022\u003c/span\u003e). Among the functions performed by siderophores, biocontrol stands out due to their high affinity for Fe\u003csup\u003e3+\u003c/sup\u003e, which limits their access to phytopathogens and promotes plant growth under iron-limiting conditions (Afzal et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR3\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2019\u003c/span\u003e). As for auxin production, we also found large differences in the production of siderophores among the isolates, ranging from 47.72% (B171a) to 139.52% (B169b), leaving as for auxin the possibility of strain selection for their ability to produce highest amount of siderophore that can play a major role in agriculture (Timofeeva et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR95\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2022\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eRegarding the other two activities, we did not detect significant differences in phosphate solubilisation, although all strains showed qualitative and quantitative evidence of P solubilisation. The ability of \u003cem\u003eB. vietnamiensis\u003c/em\u003e to solubilise insoluble phosphates has been widely reported previously (Park et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR70\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2010\u003c/span\u003e; Estrada et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR26\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2013\u003c/span\u003e; Liu et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR54\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2022\u003c/span\u003e; Nguyen et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR59\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2022\u003c/span\u003e; Kuang et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR51\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2024\u003c/span\u003e). Estrada et al (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR26\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2013\u003c/span\u003e) reported that \u003cem\u003eB. vietnamiensis\u003c/em\u003e isolates from rice achieved solubilisation index values similar to those reported in this study (2.34\u0026ndash;2.95). However, while Bashal et al. (2013) suggested a low correlation between halo formation and the ability to solubilise phosphates released in liquid medium, we observed in our study that all strains that formed a solubilisation halo (qualitatively) also solubilised phosphate in liquid medium (quantitatively).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eFinally, all isolates showed the ability to fix nitrogen as free-living bacteria, but we could not measure this activity precisely and therefore could not estimate significant differences between them.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eGiven these results, we were expected not only an effect of inoculation on plant growth, but also possibly differences between strains for plant phenotypic traits in response at least to auxin production levels differences. The beneficial interaction between \u003cem\u003eB. vietnamiensis\u003c/em\u003e and rice has been described previously (Gillis et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR36\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1995\u003c/span\u003e; Tran Van et al. 2000; Govindarajan et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR39\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2008\u003c/span\u003e; R\u0026iacute;os-Ruiz et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR75\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2020\u003c/span\u003e; Shinjo et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR86\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2020\u003c/span\u003e; Wallner et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR99\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2022\u003c/span\u003e), but with sometimes conflicting results. King et al. (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR47\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2019\u003c/span\u003e) reported that Nipponbare rice (japonica) plants inoculated with \u003cem\u003eB. vietnamiensis\u003c/em\u003e TVV75 (LMG10929\u003csup\u003eT\u003c/sup\u003e) had no significant effect on biomass production compared to the non-inoculated control at 7 and 14 days after inoculation under gnotobiotic conditions. In our study, we found significant differences between the strains and the non-inoculated control evaluated at 10 and 21 days after inoculation. The LE genotype showed significant differences for root and shoot length at 10 days between isolates, but with a weak correlation between the two sets of measurements (r\u003csup\u003e2\u003c/sup\u003e\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0.38), while the LC genotype showed almost no significant differences, but with a higher r\u003csup\u003e2\u003c/sup\u003e value (0.75). The low correlation value for LE resulted in a lack of significant differences between the strains when considering the total length (shoot\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;aerial), except for isolate la1a4, which is not different from the uninoculated condition, although it was one of the higher auxins and siderophore producers in our tests. Many previous studies have demonstrated the effect of bacterial auxin on plant growth, in terms of height, root length, dry weight shoot and dry weight root, plant nutrient content, chlorophyll content, leaf area and yield (Pal et al. al. 2022), with an effect being concentration dependent (Gholami et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR38\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2012\u003c/span\u003e). Quite disappointingly, we did not detect any relation between the level of auxin production of each strain and their impact on either root or shoot length. There was either no significant difference among strain (for variety LC) or no correlation for variety LE. The other putative growth-promoting activities we measured in our isolates do not appear to have an effect on rice growth either. This lack of correlation may be due to the absence of a dose effect, which would be rather surprising given the different production levels. More likely the growing conditions may not have allowed auxin-related effects to be fully expressed. In our study, we chose to place our plants in non-limiting growing conditions, i. e. with a rich growth medium, where Fe or phosphate is not limiting and therefore the capacity of the bacteria to recover these elements does not play a major role. The increase in plant height and biomass is associated with an increase in the expression of in planta genes involved in iron storage, siderophore biosynthesis and nutrient transport (Zhao et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR107\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2020\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eOne exception is related to nitrogen. It has been reported that inoculation of rice with \u003cem\u003eB. vietnamiensis\u003c/em\u003e increases the efficient use of mineral nitrogen (R\u0026iacute;os-Ruiz et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR75\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2020\u003c/span\u003e; Shinjo et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR86\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2020\u003c/span\u003e). Consequently, the five treatments with \u003cem\u003eB. vietnamiensis\u003c/em\u003e and the control strain \u003cem\u003eP. megaterium\u003c/em\u003e SMBH14-02, inoculated in the two rice varieties and supplemented with mineral nitrogen (KNO3 1%), increased the nitrogen content in the aerial and root parts from 11 to 19% on average. Although nitrogen fixation is an intrinsic capacity of \u003cem\u003eB. vietnamiensis\u003c/em\u003e (Gillis et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR36\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1995\u003c/span\u003e; Shinjo et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR85\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2018\u003c/span\u003e; Bach et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR9\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2022\u003c/span\u003e), recent studies have concluded that it would not be the main growth promoting mechanism in rice. Shinjo et al. (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR86\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2020\u003c/span\u003e) inoculated \u003cem\u003eB. vietnamiensis\u003c/em\u003e RS1 into seedlings of rice cultivar Nipponbare (japonica) and concluded that the promotion of root growth occurred through hormonal regulation and increased nitrogen uptake through the overexpression of genes related to the uptake, transport and assimilation of mineral nitrogen. This ability is intrinsic to endophytic \u003cem\u003eBurkholderia\u003c/em\u003e, as it improves the acquisition and transport of nutrients in tissues at the transcriptional level (Zhao et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR107\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2020\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eFinally, with regard to plant genotype, it is well known that plant genotype influences the response to inoculation of specific bacterial strains (Sharma et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR84\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2014\u003c/span\u003e; Belimov et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR14\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2015\u003c/span\u003e; Ahmed et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR4\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2021\u003c/span\u003e). Wallner et al. (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR99\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2022\u003c/span\u003e) inoculated \u003cem\u003eB. vietnamiensis\u003c/em\u003e LMG10929 into two rice cultivars, Nipponbare (japonica) and IR64 (indica); although they observed similar colonisation patterns between the two genotypes, they found that there was a strong influence of rice genotype, particularly in relation to the indica group more than the japonica group. The IR64 (indica) cultivar inoculated with \u003cem\u003eB. vietnamiensis\u003c/em\u003e increased the expression of the nitrate transporter NRT1.1B, affecting its capacity for assimilation and uptake of nitrate from the nutrient solution. In our study, the results suggested, once again as in other studies, that selecting bacterial strains for inoculation to improve plant growth can only be done by taking into account the diversity of cultivated varieties, but also by integrating into breeding programmes the ability of varieties to interact with micro-organisms.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cb\u003eInoculation of\u003c/b\u003e \u003cb\u003eB. vietnamiensis\u003c/b\u003e \u003cb\u003eand protection against pathogens\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eRecently, Wang et al. (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR101\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2023\u003c/span\u003e), reported that the inoculation of \u003cem\u003eB. vietnamiensis\u003c/em\u003e strain B23 in \u003cem\u003eCitrus\u003c/em\u003e plants increased the expression of genes related to the use and uptake of nutrients from the rhizosphere and increased antagonistic activities against competing bacteria and fungi, as well as resistance to competitor-derived metabolites. Meng et al. (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR63\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2023\u003c/span\u003e) reported the isolation of \u003cem\u003eB. vietnamiensis\u003c/em\u003e C12 as an antifungal endophyte of the medicinal plant \u003cem\u003eFicus tikoua\u003c/em\u003e and demonstrated the production of siderophores with bactericidal activity, ornibactin C-4 and C-8. Similarly, Wang et al. (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR102\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2022\u003c/span\u003e) demonstrated the ability of \u003cem\u003eB. vietnamiensis\u003c/em\u003e YQ9 to produce hydroxamate type siderophores.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eAll \u003cem\u003eB. vietnamiensis\u003c/em\u003e strains in our study showed antagonistic and antibacterial activity against three members of the \u003cem\u003eRhizoctonia\u003c/em\u003e complex, including \u003cem\u003eRhizoctonia solani\u003c/em\u003e, the causal agent of rice downy mildew (Cuong et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR19\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2011\u003c/span\u003e; Zhang et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR106\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2012\u003c/span\u003e; Sivaji et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR87\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2016\u003c/span\u003e; R\u0026iacute;os-Ruiz et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR75\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2020\u003c/span\u003e; Meng et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR63\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2023\u003c/span\u003e). The antifungal activity of \u003cem\u003eB. vietnamiensis\u003c/em\u003e against \u003cem\u003eNakataea sigmoidea\u003c/em\u003e and \u003cem\u003eNigrospora oryzae\u003c/em\u003e, the etiological agents of stem rot (Garrido and Vilela, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR35\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2019\u003c/span\u003e) and panicle branch rot (Liu et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR55\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2021\u003c/span\u003e), respectively, is reported for the first time. Meng et al. (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR63\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2023\u003c/span\u003e) reported the antifungal activity of \u003cem\u003eB. vietnamiensis\u003c/em\u003e C12 against several phytopathogenic fungi, reaching 94.78% inhibition against \u003cem\u003eR. solani\u003c/em\u003e, a higher range than that reported in our study (56.22 to 64.68%). The authors conclude that this antifungal activity against \u003cem\u003eR. solani\u003c/em\u003e is due to the production of several secondary metabolites, highlighting the siderophores ornibactin C4 and C8, the antifungal peptides burkholdin 1097, 1213, 1215 and 1119, and the monoterpenoid phenol carvacrol. Here we show that all \u003cem\u003eB. vietnamiensis\u003c/em\u003e strains have a strong effect on reducing fungal growth on artificial media in Petri dishes. Such ability of \u003cem\u003eBurkholderia\u003c/em\u003e isolates to directly suppress the growth of phytopathogenic fungi has been described previously and is important (Pal et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR69\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2022\u003c/span\u003e). Antifungal metabolites produced by \u003cem\u003eBurkholderia\u003c/em\u003e that are effective against the \u003cem\u003eRhizoctonia\u003c/em\u003e complex include pyrrolnitrin, phenazines, 1-phenazine carboxylic acid, volatile indolic compounds (Cartwright et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR15\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1995\u003c/span\u003e), siderophores such as ornibactin (Rojas-Rojas et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR73\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2018\u003c/span\u003e), some quinolone antibiotics such as hydroxymethyl-alkylquinoline (Saalim et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR79\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2020\u003c/span\u003e), and occidiofungins A-D (Lu et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR57\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2009\u003c/span\u003e). Searches for these compounds in \u003cem\u003eB. vietnamiensis\u003c/em\u003e genomes have detected some of the genes involved in the production of these compounds (such as ornibactin), while others were not detected (such as pyrrolnitrin or occidiofungins A-D).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThere is still a long way to go to isolate and characterise the antifungal compounds produced by \u003cem\u003eB. vietnamiensis\u003c/em\u003e, but we can expect new metabolites to be found. It is also clear that there is a huge gap from Petri dish tests to the use of either live bacteria or metabolites extract in the field to combat rice diseases, but even if \u003cem\u003eBurkholderia\u003c/em\u003e s.s. is still a problematic genus for use as a bioinoculant, and \u003cem\u003eB. vietnamiensis\u003c/em\u003e species in particular, it remains an extremely interesting and promising genus in the search for solutions and alternative compounds to fight against rice diseases.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Conclusions","content":"\u003cp\u003eAmong the endophytic strains of \u003cem\u003eBurkholderia vietnamiensis\u003c/em\u003e there is genetic diversity, as well as a wide metabolic diversity in terms of direct and indirect growth promotion mechanisms in both rice varieties, at the level of aerial biomass and foliar nitrogen accumulation. Although, no significant differences are observed in growth promotion between the inoculated treatments, nor is superiority observed against harmless and beneficial strains, such as \u003cem\u003eP. megaterium\u003c/em\u003e. On the other hand, our tests were only conducted at the greenhouse level, so there must be other variables at play at the field level. An important factor is that \u003cem\u003eB. vietnamiensis\u003c/em\u003e adapts very well to the endophytic style of rice, which is undoubtedly a great advantage over other strains, so it is necessary to evaluate a balance between benefits and risks, and this opens the door to new studies on the possibility or not of using this strain, which is in the cepacia complex. For future studies, the biosafety involved in the use of these strains should be evaluated, considering the opportunistic pathogenic potential of members of the \u003cem\u003eBurkholderia cepacia\u003c/em\u003e complex. To do this, virulence genes associated with pathogenicity must be searched in the genomes of the respective strains.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Declarations","content":"\u003ch2\u003eAuthor Contribution\u003c/h2\u003e\u003cp\u003eConceptualization: R.A.V.N.; J.C.Ch.G., and G.B.; Methodology: R.A.V.N and G.B.; Validation: P.P.M.C. and N.R.A.S.; Formal analysis: R.A.V.N., A.W.O.R, and G.B.; Research: P.P.M.C., N.R.A.S and R.A.V.N.; Resources: R.A.V.N.; Writing-original draft preparation: R.A.V.N. and P.P.M.C.; Writing-review and editing: G.B. and J.C.Ch.G.; Visualization: R.A.V.N.; Supervision: R.A.V.N and G.B.; Funding acquisition: R.A.V.N. and J.C.Ch.G. All the authors read and approved the final manuscript.\u003c/p\u003e\u003ch2\u003eAcknowledgement\u003c/h2\u003e\u003cp\u003eThe authors thank Edson Torres Ch\u0026aacute;vez, leader of the rice program of the National Institute of Agrarian Innovation (INIA), for providing the rice varieties tested in this study, and they also thank Professor Miguel Garrido Rondoy, research professor at the National University of Tumbes, for donating the strains of phytopathogenic fungi to carry out this study.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"References","content":"\u003col\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eAba-Regis B, Oliveros K, Ibarra-Romero C, Raymundo A, Aggangan N, Zulaybar T, Rosana A (2021) Draft Genome Sequence of the Phosphate-Solubilizing Rhizobacterium \u003cem\u003eBurkholderia pseudomultivorans\u003c/em\u003e Strain MPSB1, Isolated from a Copper Mined-Out Site. Microbiol Resour Announc 10:10\u0026ndash;1128. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1128/mra.01304-20\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1128/mra.01304-20\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eAdaikpoh B, Fernandez H, Eust\u0026aacute;quio A (2022) Biotechnology approaches for natural product discovery, engineering, and production based on \u003cem\u003eBurkholderia\u003c/em\u003e bacteria. Curr Opin Biotechnol 77:102782. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.copbio.2022.102782\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1016/j.copbio.2022.102782\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eAfzal I, Shinwari Z, Sikandar S, Shahzad S (2019) Plant beneficial endophytic bacteria: Mechanisms, diversity, host range and genetic determinants. Microbiol Res 221:36\u0026ndash;49. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.micres.2019.02.001\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1016/j.micres.2019.02.001\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eAhmed S, Heo T, Roy A, Walitang D, Choi J, Sa T (2021) Accumulation of compatible solutes in rice (\u003cem\u003eOryza sativa\u003c/em\u003e L.) cultivars by inoculation of endophytic plant growth promoting bacteria to alleviate salt stress. Appl Biol Chem 64:1\u0026ndash;14. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1186/s13765-021-00638-x\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1186/s13765-021-00638-x\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eAlam K, Zhao Y, Lu X, Gong K, Zhong L, Hao J, Islam M, Islam S, Li G, Zhang Y, Li R, Li A (2022) Isolation, complete genome sequencing and in silico genome mining of \u003cem\u003eBurkholderia\u003c/em\u003e for secondary metabolites. BMC Microbiol 22:323. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12866-022-02692-x\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1186/s12866-022-02692-x\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eAltschul S, Gish W, Miller W, Myers E, Lipman D (1990) Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol 215:403\u0026ndash;410. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-2836(05)80360-2\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1016/S0022-2836(05)80360-2\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eArone G, Calder\u0026oacute;n C, Moreno S, Bedmar E (2014) Identification of \u003cem\u003eEnsifer\u003c/em\u003e strains isolated from root nodules of \u003cem\u003eMedicago hispida\u003c/em\u003e grown in association with \u003cem\u003eZea mays\u003c/em\u003e in the Quechua region of the Peruvian Andes. Biol Fertil Soils 50:185\u0026ndash;190. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-013-0825-3\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1007/s00374-013-0825-3\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eBach E, Sant'Anna F, Magrich dos Passos J, Balsanelli E, de Baura V, Pedrosa F, de Souza E, Passaglia L (2017) Detection of misidentifications of species from the \u003cem\u003eBurkholderia cepacia\u003c/em\u003e complex and description of a new member, the soil bacterium \u003cem\u003eBurkholderia catarinensis\u003c/em\u003e sp. nov. Pathog Dis 75:ftx076. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1093/femspd/ftx076\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1093/femspd/ftx076\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eBach E, Sant'Anna F, dos Santos Seger G, Passaglia L (2022) Pangenome inventory of \u003cem\u003eBurkholderia sensu lato\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cem\u003eBurkholderia sensu stricto\u003c/em\u003e, and the \u003cem\u003eBurkholderia cepacia\u003c/em\u003e complex reveals the uniqueness of \u003cem\u003eBurkholderia catarinensi\u003c/em\u003es. Genomics 114:398\u0026ndash;408. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1080/1040841X.2021.1946009\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1080/1040841X.2021.1946009\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eBaldani J, Pot B, Kirchhof G, Falsen E, Baldani V, Olivares F, Hoste B, Kersters A, Hartmann A, Gillis M, D\u0026ouml;bereiner J (1996) Emended description of \u003cem\u003eHerbaspirillum\u003c/em\u003e; inccusion of [\u003cem\u003ePseudomonas\u003c/em\u003e] \u003cem\u003erubrisubalbicans\u003c/em\u003e, a mild plant pathogen, as \u003cem\u003eHerbaspirillum rubrisubalbicans\u003c/em\u003e comb. Nov.; and classification of a Group of Clinical Isolates (EF Group 1) as \u003cem\u003eHerbaspirillum\u003c/em\u003e species 3. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 46:802\u0026ndash;810. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1099/00207713-46-3-802\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1099/00207713-46-3-802\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eBaldani J, Reis V, Videira S, Boddey L, Baldani V (2014) The art of isolating nitrogen-fixing bacteria from non-leguminous plants using N-free semi-solid media: a practical guide for microbiologists. Plant Soil 384:413\u0026ndash;431. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-014-2186-6\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1007/s11104-014-2186-6\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eBanik A, Dash G, Swain P, Kumar U, Mukhopadhyay S, Dangar T (2019) Application of rice (\u003cem\u003eOryza sativa\u003c/em\u003e L.) root endophytic diazotrophic \u003cem\u003eAzotobacter\u003c/em\u003e sp. strain Avi2 (MCC 3432) can increase rice yield under green house and field condition. Microbiol Res 219:56\u0026ndash;65. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.micres.2018.11.004\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1016/j.micres.2018.11.004\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eBashan Y, Kamnev A, de-Bashan L (2013) Tricalcium phosphate is inappropriate as a universal selection factor for isolating and testing phosphate-solubilizing bacteria that enhance plant growth: a proposal for an alternative procedure. Biol Fertil Soils 49:465\u0026ndash;479. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-012-0737-7\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1007/s00374-012-0737-7\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eBelimov A, Puhalsky I, Safronova V, Shaposhnikov A, Vishnyakova M, Semenova E, Zinovkina N, Makarova N, Wenzel W, Tikhonovich I (2015) Role of plant genotype and soil conditions in symbiotic plant-microbe interactions for adaptation of plants to cadmium-polluted soils. Wat Air Soil Poll 226:1\u0026ndash;15. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-015-2537-9\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1007/s11270-015-2537-9\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eCartwright D, Chilton W, Benson D (1995) Pyrrolnitrin and phenazine production by \u003cem\u003ePseudomonas cepacia\u003c/em\u003e, strain 5.5B, a biocontrol agent of \u003cem\u003eRhizoctonia solani\u003c/em\u003e. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 43:211\u0026ndash;216. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1007/BF00172814\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1007/BF00172814\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eCastellano-Hinojosa A, Bedmar E (2017) 14 Methods for Evaluating Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria Traits. Adv PGPR Res 255. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1079/9781786390325.0255\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1079/9781786390325.0255\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eConway B, Greenberg E (2002) Quorum-sensing signals and quorum-sensing genes in \u003cem\u003eBurkholderia vietnamiensis\u003c/em\u003e. J Bacteriol 184. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1128/jb.184.4.1187-1191.2002\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1128/jb.184.4.1187-1191.2002\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eCui Z, Wang S, Kakar K, Xie G, Li B, Chen G, Zhu B (2021) Genome sequence and adaptation analysis of the human and rice pathogenic strain \u003cem\u003eBurkholderia glumae\u003c/em\u003e AU6208. Pathogens 10:87. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens10020087\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.3390/pathogens10020087\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eCuong N, Nicolaisen M, S\u0026oslash;rensen J, Olsson S (2011) Hyphae-colonizing \u003cem\u003eBurkholderia\u003c/em\u003e sp.\u0026mdash;a new source of biological control agents against sheath blight disease (\u003cem\u003eRhizoctonia solani\u003c/em\u003e AG1-IA) in rice. Microb Ecol 62:425\u0026ndash;434. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-011-9823-x\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1007/s00248-011-9823-x\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eDepoorter E, De Canck E, Peeters C, Wieme A, Zlosnik J, LiPuma J, Coenye T, Vandamme P (2020) \u003cem\u003eBurkholderia cepacia\u003c/em\u003e complex taxon K: where to split? Front Microbiol 11:559949. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2020.01594\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.3389/fmicb.2020.01594\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eDepoorter E, Bull M, Peeters C, Coenye T, Vandamme P, Mahenthiralingam E (2016) \u003cem\u003eBurkholderia\u003c/em\u003e: an update on taxonomy and biotechnological potential as antibiotic producers. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 100:5215\u0026ndash;5229. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-016-7520-x\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1007/s00253-016-7520-x\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eDobritsa A, Samadpour M (2016) Transfer of eleven species of the genus \u003cem\u003eBurkholderia\u003c/em\u003e to the genus \u003cem\u003eParaburkholderia\u003c/em\u003e and proposal of \u003cem\u003eCaballeronia\u003c/em\u003e gen. nov. to accommodate twelve species of the genera \u003cem\u003eBurkholderia\u003c/em\u003e and \u003cem\u003eParaburkholderia\u003c/em\u003e. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 66:2836\u0026ndash;2846. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1099/ijsem.0.001065\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1099/ijsem.0.001065\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eDraghi W, Alvarez F, Russo D, Lagares A, Wall L, Zorreguieta A (2021) Root-associated \u003cem\u003eBurkholderia\u003c/em\u003e spp. on the hairy vetch (\u003cem\u003eVicia villosa\u003c/em\u003e Roth.) cover crop vary depending on soil history of use. Rhizosphere 17:100297. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.rhisph.2020.100297\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1016/j.rhisph.2020.100297\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eEberl L, Vandamme P (2016) Members of the genus \u003cem\u003eBurkholderia\u003c/em\u003e: good and bad guys. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.8221.1\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.12688/f1000research.8221.1\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e. F1000Research\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eElshafie H, Camele I (2021) An overview of metabolic activity, beneficial and pathogenic aspects of \u003cem\u003eBurkholderia\u003c/em\u003e spp. Metabolites 11:21. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.3390/metabo11050321\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.3390/metabo11050321\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eEstrada G, Baldani V, de Oliveira D, Urquiaga S, Baldani J (2013) Selection of phosphate-solubilizing diazotrophic \u003cem\u003eHerbaspirillum\u003c/em\u003e and \u003cem\u003eBurkholderia\u003c/em\u003e strains and their effect on rice crop yield and nutrient uptake. Plant Soil 369:115\u0026ndash;129. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-012-1550-7\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1007/s11104-012-1550-7\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eEstrada-De Los Santos P, Bustillos-Cristales R, Caballero-Mellado J (2001) \u003cem\u003eBurkholderia\u003c/em\u003e, a genus rich in plant-associated nitrogen fixers with wide environmental and geographic distribution. Appl Environ Microbiol 67:2790\u0026ndash;2798. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttp://doi:10.1128/AEM.67.6.2790-2798.2001\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"http://doi:10.1128/AEM.67.6.2790-2798.2001\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eEstrada-de Los Santos P, Palmer M, Ch\u0026aacute;vez-Ram\u0026iacute;rez B et al (2018) Whole genome analyses suggests that \u003cem\u003eBurkholderia\u003c/em\u003e sensu lato contains two additional novel genera (\u003cem\u003eMycetohabitans\u003c/em\u003e gen. nov., and \u003cem\u003eTrinickia\u003c/em\u003e gen. nov.): implications for the evolution of diazotrophy and nodulation in the \u003cem\u003eBurkholderiaceae\u003c/em\u003e. Genes 9: 389. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.3390/genes9080389\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.3390/genes9080389\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eEtesami H, Glick B (2024) Bacterial indole-3-acetic acid: A key regulator for plant growth, plant-microbe interactions, and agricultural adaptive resilience. Microbiol Res 127602. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.3390/genes9080389\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.3390/genes9080389\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eFerreira E, Nogueira M, Hungria M (2024) Manual de an\u0026aacute;lises de bioinsumos para uso agr\u0026iacute;cola: inoculantes. Embrapa\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eFu Y, Yin Z, Yin C (2017) Biotransformation of ginsenoside Rb1 to ginsenoside Rg3 by endophytic bacterium \u003cem\u003eBurkholderia\u003c/em\u003e sp. GE 17-7 isolated from \u003cem\u003ePanax ginseng\u003c/em\u003e. J Appl Microbiol 122:1579\u0026ndash;1585. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1111/jam.13435\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1111/jam.13435\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eFu H, Gan L, Tian Z et al (2022) Rapid detection of \u003cem\u003eBurkholderia cepacia\u003c/em\u003e complex carrying the 16S rRNA gene in clinical specimens by recombinase-aided amplification. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 12:984140. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2022.984140\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.3389/fcimb.2022.984140\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eGarcia E, Cotter P (2016) \u003cem\u003eBurkholderia thailandensis\u003c/em\u003e: growth and laboratory maintenance. Curr Protoc Microbiol 42:4C\u0026ndash;41. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1002/cpmc.15\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1002/cpmc.15\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eGarcia-Vallv\u0026eacute; S, Palau J, Romeu A (1999) Horizontal gene transfer in glycosyl hydrolases inferred from codon usage in \u003cem\u003eEscherichia coli\u003c/em\u003e and \u003cem\u003eBacillus subtilis\u003c/em\u003e. Mol Biol Evol 16:1125\u0026ndash;1134. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a026203\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a026203\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eGarrido M, Vilela N (2019) Capacidad antag\u0026oacute;nica de \u003cem\u003eTrichoderma harzianum\u003c/em\u003e frente a \u003cem\u003eRhizoctonia\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cem\u003eNakatea sigmoidea\u003c/em\u003e y \u003cem\u003eSclerotium rolfsii\u003c/em\u003e y su efecto en cepas nativas de \u003cem\u003eTrichoderma\u003c/em\u003e aisladas de cultivos de arroz. Scientia Agropecuaria 10:199\u0026ndash;206. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttp://dx.doi.org/10.17268/sci.agropecu.2019.02.05\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.17268/sci.agropecu.2019.02.05\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eGillis M, Van Van T, Bardin R et al (1995) Polyphasic taxonomy in the genus \u003cem\u003eBurkholderia\u003c/em\u003e leading to an emended description of the genus and proposition of \u003cem\u003eBurkholderia vietnamiensis\u003c/em\u003e sp. nov. for N2-fixing isolates from rice in Vietnam. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 45:274\u0026ndash;289. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1099/00207713-45-2-274\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1099/00207713-45-2-274\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eGovindarajan M, Balandreau J, Muthukumarasamy R, Revathi G, Lakshminarasimhan C (2006) Improved yield of micropropagated sugarcane following inoculation by endophytic \u003cem\u003eBurkholderia vietnamiensis\u003c/em\u003e. Plant Soil 280:239\u0026ndash;252. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-005-3223-2\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1007/s11104-005-3223-2\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eGholami A, Biyari A, Gholipoor M, Rahmani H (2012) Growth Promotion of Maize (\u003cem\u003eZea mays\u003c/em\u003e L.) by Plant-Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria under Field Conditions. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal \u0026ndash; Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 43:1263\u0026ndash;1272. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttp://10.1080/00103624.2012.666302\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"http://10.1080/00103624.2012.666302\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eGovindarajan M, Balandreau J, Kwon S, Weon H, Lakshminarasimhan C (2008) Effects of the inoculation of \u003cem\u003eBurkholderia vietnamensis\u003c/em\u003e and related endophytic diazotrophic bacteria on grain yield of rice. Microb Ecol 55:21\u0026ndash;37. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-007-92479\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1007/s00248-007-92479\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eGranada C, Arruda L, Lisboa B, Passaglia L, Vargas L (2014) Diversity of native rhizobia isolated in south Brazil and their growth promotion effect on white clover (\u003cem\u003eTrifolium repens\u003c/em\u003e) and rice (\u003cem\u003eOryza sativa\u003c/em\u003e) plants. Biol Fertil Soils 50:123\u0026ndash;132. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-013-0840-4\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1007/s00374-013-0840-4\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eGravel V, Antoun H, Tweddell R (2007) Effect of indole-acetic acid (IAA) on the development of symptoms caused by \u003cem\u003ePythium ultimum\u003c/em\u003e on tomato plants. Eur J Plant Pathol 119:457\u0026ndash;462. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10658-007-9170-4\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1007/s10658-007-9170-4\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eJaccard P (1912) The distribution of the flora in the alpine zone. 1 New phytologist 11:37\u0026ndash;50\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eJi S, Gururani M, Chun S (2014) Isolation and characterization of plant growth promoting endophytic diazotrophic bacteria from Korean rice cultivars. Microbiol Res 169:83\u0026ndash;98. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.micres.2013.06.003\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1016/j.micres.2013.06.003\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eJin Y, Zhou J, Zhou J, Hu M, Zhang Q, Kong N, Ren H, Liang L, Yue J (2020) Genome-based classification of \u003cem\u003eBurkholderia cepacia\u003c/em\u003e complex provides new insight into its taxonomic status. Biol Direct 15:1\u0026ndash;14. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1186/s13062-020-02585\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1186/s13062-020-02585\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eKamilova F, Kravchenko LV, Shaposhnikov AI, Azarova T, Makarova N, Lugtenberg B (2006) Organic acids, sugars, and L-tryptophane in exudates of vegetables growing on stonewool and their effects on activities of rhizosphere bacteria. Mol Plant-Microbe Interact 19:250\u0026ndash;256. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1094/MPMI-19-0250\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1094/MPMI-19-0250\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eKimura M (1980) A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J Mol Evol 16:111\u0026ndash;120. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003eHttps://doi.org/10.1007/BF01731581\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"Https://10.1007/BF01731581\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eKing E, Wallner A, Rimbault I, Barrachina C, Klonowska A, Moulin L, Czernic P (2019) Monitoring of rice transcriptional responses to contrasted colonizing patterns of phytobeneficial \u003cem\u003eBurkholderia sl\u003c/em\u003e reveals a temporal shift in JA systemic response. Front Plant Sci 10:1141. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2019.01141\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.3389/fpls.2019.01141\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eKing E, Wallner A, Guigard L et al (2023) \u003cem\u003eParaburkholderia phytofirmans\u003c/em\u003e PsJN colonization of rice endosphere triggers an atypical transcriptomic response compared to rice native \u003cem\u003eBurkholderia\u003c/em\u003e sl endophytes. Sci Rep 13:10696. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-37314-7\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1038/s41598-023-37314-7\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eKoeuth T, Versalovic J, Lupski J (1995) Differential subsequence conservation of interspersed repetitive Streptococcus pneumoniae BOX elements in diverse bacteria. Genome Res 5:408\u0026ndash;418. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi:10.1101/gr.5.4.408\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"https://doi:10.1101/gr.5.4.408\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eKong P, Richardson P, Hong C (2020) \u003cem\u003eBurkholderia sp\u003c/em\u003e. SSG is a broad-spectrum antagonist against plant diseases caused by diverse pathogens. Biol Control 151:104380. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2020.104380\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1016/j.biocontrol.2020.104380\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eKuang W, Chen W, Lei C et al (2024) Diversity of endophytic bacterial community in rice roots and their roles in phosphate solubilization and plant growth. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.rhisph.2024.100877\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1016/j.rhisph.2024.100877\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e. Rhizosphere 100877\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eKumar S, Stecher G, Li M, Knyaz C, Tamura K (2018) MEGA X: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis across computing platforms. Mol Biol Evol 35:1547. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msy096\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1093/molbev/msy096\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eLin Q, Lv Y, Gao Z, Qiu L (2020) \u003cem\u003ePararobbsia silviterrae\u003c/em\u003e gen. nov., sp. nov., isolated from forest soil and reclassification of \u003cem\u003eBurkholderia alpina\u003c/em\u003e as \u003cem\u003ePararobbsia alpina\u003c/em\u003e comb. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 70:1412\u0026ndash;1420. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1099/ijsem.0.003932\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1099/ijsem.0.003932\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eLiu M, Philp J, Wang Y et al (2022) Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria \u003cem\u003eBurkholderia vietnamiensis\u003c/em\u003e B418 inhibits root-knot nematode on watermelon by modifying the rhizosphere microbial community. Sci Rep 12:8381. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-12472-2\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1038/s41598-022-12472-2\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eLiu L, Zhao K, Zhao Y, Zhang Y, Fu Q, Huang S (2021) \u003cem\u003eNigrospora oryzae\u003c/em\u003e causing panicle branch rot disease on \u003cem\u003eOryza sativa\u003c/em\u003e (rice). Plant Dis 105:2724. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-11-20-2423-PDN\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1094/PDIS-11-20-2423-PDN\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eLopes-Santos L, Castro D, Ferreira-Tonin M, Corr\u0026ecirc;a D, Weir B, Park D, Mariscal L, Neto J, Dest\u0026eacute;fano S (2017) Reassessment of the taxonomic position of \u003cem\u003eBurkholderia andropogonis\u003c/em\u003e and description of \u003cem\u003eRobbsia andropogonis\u003c/em\u003e gen. nov., comb. nov. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 110:727\u0026ndash;736. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10482-017-0842-6\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1007/s10482-017-0842-6\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eLu S, Novak J, Austin F, Gu G, Ellis D, Kirk M, Wilson-Stanford S, Tonelli M, Smith L (2009) Occidiofungin, a unique antifungal glycopeptide produced by a strain of \u003cem\u003eBurkholderia contaminans\u003c/em\u003e. Biochemistry 48:8312\u0026ndash;8321. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttp://doi.org/10.1021/bi900814c\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1021/bi900814c\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003ede Oliveira Viana T, da Silva Santos J, Manfredi C, de Sousa Moreira R, Baldani V, Ferreira J (2015) Isolation and inoculation of diazotrophic bacteria in rice (\u003cem\u003eOryza sativa\u003c/em\u003e L.) grown in Vitoria da Conquista-BA. Afr J Agric Res 10:2847\u0026ndash;2854. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.5897/AJAR2014.9282\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.5897/AJAR2014.9282\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eNguyen V, Mai D, Chu H, Le T (2022) In vitro screening of siderophore-producing rice root endophytic bacteria from up-land paddies in north-western Vietnam for plant growth-promoting activities. Malays J Microbiol 18. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttp://doi:10.21161/mjm.211297\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"http://doi:10.21161/mjm.211297\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eMahenthiralingam E, Bischof J, Byrne S, Radomski C, Davies J, Av-Gay Y, Vandamme P (2000) DNA-based diagnostic approaches for identification of \u003cem\u003eBurkholderia cepacia\u003c/em\u003e complex, \u003cem\u003eBurkholderia vietnamiensis\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cem\u003eBurkholderia multivorans\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cem\u003eBurkholderia stabilis\u003c/em\u003e, and \u003cem\u003eBurkholderia cepacia\u003c/em\u003e genomovars I and III. J Clin Microbiol 38:3165\u0026ndash;3173. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi:10.1128/jcm.38.9.3165-3173.2000\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"https://doi:10.1128/jcm.38.9.3165-3173.2000\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eMadhaiyan M, Selvakumar G, Alex T, Cai L, Ji L (2021) Plant growth promoting abilities of novel \u003cem\u003eBurkholderia\u003c/em\u003e-related genera and their interactions with some economically important tree species. Front Sustain Food Syst 5:618305. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2021.618305\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.3389/fsufs.2021.618305\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eMarra M, Fons\u0026ecirc;ca S, Soares C, de Oliveira S et al (2012) Biological nitrogen fixation and phosphate solubilization by bacteria isolated from tropical soils. Plant Soil 357:289\u0026ndash;307. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-012-1157-z\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1007/s11104-012-1157-z\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eMeng X, Medison R, Cao S, Wang L, Cheng S, Tan L, Sun Z, Zhou Y (2023) Isolation, identification, and biocontrol mechanisms of endophytic \u003cem\u003eBurkholderia vietnamiensis\u003c/em\u003e C12 from \u003cem\u003eFicus tikoua\u003c/em\u003e Bur against \u003cem\u003eRhizoctonia solani\u003c/em\u003e. Biol Control 178:105132. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2022.105132\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1016/j.biocontrol.2022.105132\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eMeyer J, Van Van T, Stintzi A, Berge O, Winkelmann G (1995) Ornibactin production and transport properties in strains of \u003cem\u003eBurkholderia vietnamiensis\u003c/em\u003e and \u003cem\u003eBurkholderia cepacia\u003c/em\u003e (formerly Pseudomonas cepacia). Biometals 8:309\u0026ndash;317. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttp://doi.org/10.1007/BF00141604\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1007/BF00141604\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eMorales-Ru\u0026iacute;z L, Rodr\u0026iacute;guez-Cisneros M, Kerber-D\u0026iacute;azJ, Rojas-Rojas FU, Ibarra J, Estrada-de Los Santos P (2022) \u003cem\u003eBurkholderia orbicola\u003c/em\u003e sp. nov., a novel species within the \u003cem\u003eBurkholderia cepacia\u003c/em\u003e complex. Arch Microbiol 204:178. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00203-022-02778-0\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1007/s00203-022-02778-0\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eMullins A, Murray J, Bull M et al (2019) Genome mining identifies cepacin as a plant-protective metabolite of the biopesticidal bacterium \u003cem\u003eBurkholderia ambifaria\u003c/em\u003e. Nat Microbiol 4:996\u0026ndash;1005. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41564-019-0383-z\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1038/s41564-019-0383-z\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eMurphy J, Riley J (1962) A modified single solution method for the determination of phosphate in natural waters. Anal Chim Acta 27:31\u0026ndash;36. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-2670(00)88444-5\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1016/S0003-2670(00)88444-5\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eNautiyal C (1999) An efficient microbiological growth medium for screening phosphate solubilizing microorganisms. FEMS Microbiol Lett 170:265\u0026ndash;270. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6968.1999.tb13383.x\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1111/j.1574-6968.1999.tb13383.x\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003ePal G, Saxena S, Kumar K et al (2022) Endophytic \u003cem\u003eBurkholderia\u003c/em\u003e: Multifunctional roles in plant growth promotion and stress tolerance. Microbiol Res 265:127201. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.micres.2022.127201\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1016/j.micres.2022.127201\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003ePark K, Lee O, Jung H et al (2010) Rapid solubilization of insoluble phosphate by a novel environmental stress-tolerant \u003cem\u003eBurkholderia vietnamiensis\u003c/em\u003e M6 isolated from ginseng rhizospheric soil. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 86:947\u0026ndash;955. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.micres.2022.127201\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1016/j.micres.2022.127201\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003ePayne G, Vandamme P, Morgan S et al (2005) Development of a recA gene-based identification approach for the entire \u003cem\u003eBurkholderia\u003c/em\u003e genus. Appl Environ Microbiol 71:3917\u0026ndash;3927. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.71.7.3917-3927.2005\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1128/AEM.71.7.3917-3927.2005\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eRam\u0026iacute;rez-Bahena M, Salazar S, Vel\u0026aacute;zquez E, Laguerre, Peix A (2015) Characterization of phosphate solubilizing rhizobacteria associated with pea (\u003cem\u003ePisum sativum\u003c/em\u003e L.) isolated from two agricultural soils. Symbiosis 67:33\u0026ndash;41. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1007/s13199-015-0375-6\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1007/s13199-015-0375-6\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eRojas-Rojas F, Salazar-G\u0026oacute;mez A, Vargas-D\u0026iacute;az et al (2018) Broad-spectrum antimicrobial activity by \u003cem\u003eBurkholderia cenocepacia\u003c/em\u003e TAtl-371, a strain isolated from the tomato rhizosphere. Microbiol 164:1072\u0026ndash;1086. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1099/mic.0.000675\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1099/mic.0.000675\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eRios-Ruiz W, Tuanama-Re\u0026aacute;tegui C, Huam\u0026aacute;n-C\u0026oacute;rdova G, Valdez-Nu\u0026ntilde;ez R (2023) Co-Inoculation of endophytes \u003cem\u003eBacillus siamensis\u003c/em\u003e TUR07-02b and \u003cem\u003ePriestia megaterium\u003c/em\u003e SMBH14-02 promotes growth in rice with low doses of nitrogen fertilizer. Plants 12:524. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.3390/plants12030524\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.3390/plants12030524\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eR\u0026iacute;os-Ruiz W, Torres-Ch\u0026aacute;vez E, Torres-Delgado J, Rojas-Garc\u0026iacute;a J, Bedmar E, Valdez-Nu\u0026ntilde;ez R (2020) Inoculation of bacterial consortium increases rice yield (\u003cem\u003eOryza sativa\u003c/em\u003e L.) reducing applications of nitrogen fertilizer in San Martin region, Peru. Rhizosphere 14:100200. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.rhisph.2020.1002000\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1016/j.rhisph.2020.1002000\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eRojas-Rojas F, L\u0026oacute;pez-S\u0026aacute;nchez D, Meza-Radilla G, M\u0026eacute;ndez-Canarios A, Ibarra J, Estrada-de los Santos P (2019) El controvertido complejo \u003cem\u003eBurkholderia cepacia\u003c/em\u003e, un grupo de especies promotoras del crecimiento vegetal y pat\u0026oacute;genas de plantas, animales y humanos. Rev Argent Microbiol 51:84\u0026ndash;92. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ram.2018.01.002\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1016/j.ram.2018.01.002\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eRomero-Guti\u0026eacute;rrez K, Dourado M, Garrido L, Olchanheski L, Mano E, Dini-Andreote F, Valvano M, Ara\u0026uacute;jo W (2020) Phenotypic traits of \u003cem\u003eBurkholderia\u003c/em\u003e spp. associated with ecological adaptation and plant-host interaction. Microbiol Res 236:126451. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.micres.2020.126451\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1016/j.micres.2020.126451\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSaitou N, Nei M (1987) The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 4:406\u0026ndash;425. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040454\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040454\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSaalim M, Villegas-Moreno J, Clark B (2020) Bacterial alkyl-4-quinolones: Discovery, structural diversity and biological properties. Molecules 25:5689. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25235689\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.3390/molecules25235689\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSamuel S, Suzuki K, Asiloglu R, Harada N (2023) Rice endophytic communities are strongly dependent on microbial communities specific to each soil. Biol Fertil Soils 59:733\u0026ndash;746. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttp://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-023-01743-3\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1007/s00374-023-01743-3\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSawana A, Adeolu M, Gupta R (2014) Molecular signatures and phylogenomic analysis of the genus \u003cem\u003eBurkholderia\u003c/em\u003e: proposal for division of this genus into the emended genus \u003cem\u003eBurkholderia\u003c/em\u003e containing pathogenic organisms and a new genus \u003cem\u003eParaburkholderia\u003c/em\u003e gen. nov. harboring environmental species. Front Genet 5:119458. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2014.00429\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.3389/fgene.2014.00429\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSchwyn B, Neilands J (1987) Universal chemical assay for the detection and determination of siderophores. Anal Biochem 160:47\u0026ndash;56. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1016/0003-2697(87)90612-9\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1016/0003-2697(87)90612-9\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eShabanamol S, Divya K, George T, Rishad K, Sreekumar T, Jisha M (2018) Characterization and in planta nitrogen fixation of plant growth promoting endophytic diazotrophic \u003cem\u003eLysinibacillus sphaericus\u003c/em\u003e isolated from rice (\u003cem\u003eOryza sativa\u003c/em\u003e). Physiol Mol Plant Pathol 102:46\u0026ndash;54. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmpp.2017.11.003\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1016/j.pmpp.2017.11.003\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSharma A, Shankhdhar D, Shankhdhar S (2014) Growth promotion of the rice genotypes by PGPRs isolated from rice rhizosphere. J Soil Sci Plant Nutr 14:505\u0026ndash;517. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttp://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-95162014005000040\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.4067/S0718-95162014005000040\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eShinjo R, Uesaka K, Ihara K, Sakazaki S, Yano K, Kondo M, Tanaka A (2018) Draft genome sequence of \u003cem\u003eBurkholderia vietnamiensis\u003c/em\u003e strain RS1, a nitrogen-fixing endophyte isolated from sweet potato. Microbiol Resour Announc 7:10\u0026ndash;1128. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1128/mra.00820-18\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1128/mra.00820-18\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eShinjo R, Tanaka A, Sugiura D et al (2020) Comprehensive analysis of the mechanisms underlying enhanced growth and root N acquisition in rice by the endophytic diazotroph, \u003cem\u003eBurkholderia vietnamiensis\u003c/em\u003e RS1. Plant Soil 450:537\u0026ndash;555. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-020-04506-3\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1007/s11104-020-04506-3\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSivaji M, Vinoth R, Tamilkumar P, Kumar S, Chandrasekar A, Syamala M (2016) Isolation and characterization of plant growth promoting \u003cem\u003eBurkholderia\u003c/em\u003e spp. Int J Plant Prot 9:223\u0026ndash;229. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttp://DOI:10.15740/HAS/IJPP/9.1/223-229\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"http://DOI:10.15740/HAS/IJPP/9.1/223-229\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eda Silva Ara\u0026uacute;jo A, Baldani V, de Souza Galisa P, Pereira J, Baldani J (2013) Response of traditional upland rice varieties to inoculation with selected diazotrophic bacteria isolated from rice cropped at the Northeast region of Brazil. Appl Soil Ecol 64:49\u0026ndash;55. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2012.10.004\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1016/j.apsoil.2012.10.004\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSneath P, Sokal R (1962) Numerical taxonomy. Nature 193:855\u0026ndash;860\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSpilker T, Baldwin A, Bumford A, Dowson C, Mahenthiralingam E, LiPuma J (2009) Expanded multilocus sequence typing for \u003cem\u003eBurkholderia\u003c/em\u003e species. J Clin Microbiol 47:2607\u0026ndash;2610. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.00770-09\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1128/jcm.00770-09\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSong O, Lee S, Lee Y, Lee S, Kim K, Choi Y (2008) Solubilization of insoluble inorganic phosphate by \u003cem\u003eBurkholderia cepacia\u003c/em\u003e DA23 isolated from cultivated soil. Braz J Microbiol 39:151\u0026ndash;156. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1590/S1517-83822008000100030\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1590/S1517-83822008000100030\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSun L, Qiu F, Zhang X, Dai X, Dong X, Song W (2008) Endophytic bacterial diversity in rice (\u003cem\u003eOryza sativa\u003c/em\u003e L.) roots estimated by 16S rDNA sequence analysis. Microb Ecol 55:415\u0026ndash;424. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-007-9287-1\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1007/s00248-007-9287-1\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eTr\u0026acirc;n Van V, Berge O, Ng\u0026ocirc; K\u0026ecirc; S, Balandreau J, Heulin T (2000) Repeated beneficial effects of rice inoculation with a strain of \u003cem\u003eBurkholderia vietnamiensis\u003c/em\u003e on early and late yield components in low fertility sulphate acid soils of Vietnam. Plant Soil 218:273\u0026ndash;284. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014986916913\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1023/A:1014986916913\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eThompson J, Higgins D, Gibson T (1994) CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res 22:4673\u0026ndash;4680. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1093/nar/22.22.4673\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1093/nar/22.22.4673\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eTimofeeva A, Galyamova M, Sedykh S (2022) Bacterial Siderophores: Classification, Biosynthesis, Perspectives of Use in Agriculture. Plants 11:3065. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.3390/plants11223065\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.3390/plants11223065\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eValdez-Nu\u0026ntilde;ez R, R\u0026iacute;os-Ruiz W, Orme\u0026ntilde;o-Orrillo E, Torres-Ch\u0026aacute;vez E, Torres-Delgado J (2020) Genetic characterization of rice endophytic bacteria (\u003cem\u003eOryza sativa\u003c/em\u003e L.) with antimicrobial activity against \u003cem\u003eBurkholderia glumae\u003c/em\u003e. Rev argent microbiol 52:315\u0026ndash;327. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ram.2019.12.002\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1016/j.ram.2019.12.002\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eValdez-Nu\u0026ntilde;ez R, Ramos-Luna L, Meza-Catal\u0026aacute;n P, Asencios-Sifuentes N, Oca\u0026ntilde;a-Rodriguez A, Chavez-Galarza J, Sandoval-Vergara A, Bena G (2024) Genetic diversity and virulence of phytopathogenic \u003cem\u003eBurkholderia glumae\u003c/em\u003e strains isolated from rice cultivars in valleys of the high jungle of Peru. Plant Disease, (ja). \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-09-23-1823-RE\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1094/PDIS-09-23-1823-RE\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eVelez L, Aburjaile F, Farias A et al (2023) \u003cem\u003eBurkholderia semiarida\u003c/em\u003e sp. nov. and \u003cem\u003eBurkholderia sola\u003c/em\u003e sp. nov., two novel \u003cem\u003eB. cepacia\u003c/em\u003e complex species causing onion sour skin. Syst Appl Microbiol 46:126415. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.syapm.2023.126415\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1016/j.syapm.2023.126415\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eWallner A, Busset N, Lachat J et al (2022) Differential Genetic Strategies of \u003cem\u003eBurkholderia vietnamiensis\u003c/em\u003e and \u003cem\u003eParaburkholderia kururiensis\u003c/em\u003e for Root Colonization of \u003cem\u003eOryza sativa\u003c/em\u003e subsp. japonica and \u003cem\u003eO. sativa\u003c/em\u003e subsp. indica, as Revealed by Transposon Mutagenesis Sequencing. Appl Environ Microbiol 88:e00642-22. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1128/aem.00642-22\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1128/aem.00642-22\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eWallner A, Klonowska A, Guigard L et al (2023) Comparative genomics and transcriptomic response to root exudates of six rice root-associated \u003cem\u003eBurkholderia sensu lato\u003c/em\u003e species. Peer Community J. 3\u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1101/2022.10.04.510755\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1101/2022.10.04.510755\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eWang Y, Duan S, Xu J, Long Y et al (2023) Comparison of the colonization ability of \u003cem\u003eBurkholderia\u003c/em\u003e strain B23 in the citrus rhizoplane and rhizosphere and assessment of the underlying mechanisms using full-length 16S rDNA amplicon and metatranscriptomic analyses. Microb Biotechnol 16:1657\u0026ndash;1670. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1111/1751-7915.14248\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1111/1751-7915.14248\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eWang Y, Huang W, Ali S, Li Y, Yu F, Deng H (2022) Isolation, Identification, and characterization of an efficient siderophore producing bacterium from heavy metal contaminated soil. Curr Microbiol 79:227. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00284-022-02922-5\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1007/s00284-022-02922-5\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eXin G, Zhang G, Kang J, Staley J, Doty S (2009) A diazotrophic, indole-3-acetic acid-producing endophyte from wild cottonwood. Biol Fertil Soils 45:669\u0026ndash;674. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-009-0377-5\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1007/s00374-009-0377-5\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eYabuuchi E, Kosako Y, Oyaizu H et al (1992) Proposal of \u003cem\u003eBurkholderia\u003c/em\u003e gen. nov. and transfer of seven species of the genus \u003cem\u003ePseudomonas\u003c/em\u003e homology group II to the new genus, with the type species \u003cem\u003eBurkholderia cepacia\u003c/em\u003e (Palleroni and Holmes 1981) comb. nov. Microbiol Immunol 36:1251\u0026ndash;1275. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/mandi1977/36/12/36_12_1251/_pdf\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/mandi1977/36/12/36_12_1251/_pdf\" targettype=\"URL\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eZapater R (1975) Evaluation of the rhizosphere/soil coefficient (R/S), under maize in relation to free-living nitrogen fixing bacteria. Anales Cient\u0026iacute;ficos 13:45\u0026ndash;57\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eZhang X, Huang Y, Harvey P, Ren Y, Zhang G, Zhou H, Yang H (2012) Enhancing plant disease suppression by \u003cem\u003eBurkholderia vietnamiensis\u003c/em\u003e through chromosomal integration of \u003cem\u003eBacillus subtilis\u003c/em\u003e chitinase gene chi113. Biotechnol Lett 34:287\u0026ndash;293. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10529-011-0760-z\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1007/s10529-011-0760-z\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eZhao J, Zhao X, Wang J, Gong Q, Zhang X, Zhang G (2020) Isolation, identification and characterization of endophytic bacterium \u003cem\u003eRhizobium oryzihabitans\u003c/em\u003e sp. nov., from rice root with biotechnological potential in agriculture. Microorganisms 8:608. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms8040608\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.3390/microorganisms8040608\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003c/ol\u003e"}],"fulltextSource":"","fullText":"","funders":[],"hasAdminPriorityOnWorkflow":false,"hasManuscriptDocX":true,"hasOptedInToPreprint":true,"hasPassedJournalQc":"","hasAnyPriority":false,"hideJournal":false,"highlight":"","institution":"","isAcceptedByJournal":false,"isAuthorSuppliedPdf":false,"isDeskRejected":"","isHiddenFromSearch":false,"isInQc":false,"isInWorkflow":false,"isPdf":false,"isPdfUpToDate":true,"isWithdrawnOrRetracted":false,"journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"archives-of-microbiology","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"externalIdentity":"aomi","sideBox":"Learn more about [Archives of Microbiology](https://www.springer.com/journal/203)","snPcode":"203","submissionUrl":"https://submission.nature.com/new-submission/203/3","title":"Archives of Microbiology","twitterHandle":"","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":true,"editorialSystem":"em","reportingPortfolio":"Springer Hybrid","inReviewEnabled":true,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":false},"keywords":"recA, Nitrogen fixation, Auxin production, Siderophores, Phosphate solubilization, Antagonism.","lastPublishedDoi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-4927294/v1","lastPublishedDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-4927294/v1","license":{"name":"CC BY 4.0","url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"manuscriptAbstract":"\u003cp\u003e \u003cem\u003eBurkholderia\u003c/em\u003e is a versatile bacterial genus and from a biotechnological point of view it is a source of various secondary metabolites with enormous application potential, especially in agriculture. The aim of this study was to isolate Gram-negative diazotrophic endophytic bacteria from rice roots, to select and study the genetic diversity of strains of the genus \u003cem\u003eBurkholderia\u003c/em\u003e, as well as the growth promotion mechanisms and the effect of their inoculation in two rice cultivars. Seventy-eight Gram-negative diazotrophic isolates were obtained from 132 root samples of different rice varieties, of which only 5.13% was positive for \u003cem\u003erec\u003c/em\u003eA gene amplification with specific \u003cem\u003eBurkholderia\u003c/em\u003e primers. Sequence analysis showed high similarity with \u003cem\u003eB. vietnamiensis\u003c/em\u003e. These strains produced auxin in broth supplemented with tryptophan (up to 13.98 \u0026micro;g mL-1), siderophores (up to 139.52%), phosphate solubilization (up to 15.99 mg PO\u003csub\u003e4\u003c/sub\u003e mL\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;1\u003c/sup\u003e), so too antibiotic and antagonist capacities against five rice pathogenic fungi. These strains increased the vigour index in two rice cultivars compared to the uninoculated or unfertilised treatment. The accumulation of total biomass was high in one strain, with significant differences observed in the response to inoculation at the cultivar level. The antibiotic and antifungal activities of \u003cem\u003eB. vietnamiensis\u003c/em\u003e strains against the two pathogenic fungi \u003cem\u003eNakataea sigmoidea\u003c/em\u003e and \u003cem\u003eNigrospora oryzae\u003c/em\u003e are described for the first time. Due to the taxonomic affinity of our strains within the \u003cem\u003eBurkholderia cepacia\u003c/em\u003e complex, their direct use in agriculture is not recommended; however, further research is required to exploit their biotechnological potential for the synthesis of useful metabolites.\u003c/p\u003e","manuscriptTitle":"Genetic diversity and characterization of the growth promotion mechanisms of Burkholderia vietnamiensis isolates from rice cultivars in valleys of the high jungle of Peru.","msid":"","msnumber":"","nonDraftVersions":[{"code":1,"date":"2024-09-13 20:45:43","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-4927294/v1","editorialEvents":[{"type":"communityComments","content":0},{"type":"editorAssigned","content":"","date":"2024-08-17T13:59:21+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"checksComplete","content":"","date":"2024-08-17T04:41:34+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"submitted","content":"Archives of Microbiology","date":"2024-08-17T00:17:42+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""}],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"archives-of-microbiology","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"externalIdentity":"aomi","sideBox":"Learn more about [Archives of Microbiology](https://www.springer.com/journal/203)","snPcode":"203","submissionUrl":"https://submission.nature.com/new-submission/203/3","title":"Archives of Microbiology","twitterHandle":"","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":true,"editorialSystem":"em","reportingPortfolio":"Springer Hybrid","inReviewEnabled":true,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":false}}],"origin":"","ownerIdentity":"961718ac-7048-4022-954f-e40ddcaf38cb","owner":[],"postedDate":"September 13th, 2024","published":true,"recentEditorialEvents":[],"rejectedJournal":[],"revision":"","amendment":"","status":"under-review","subjectAreas":[],"tags":[],"updatedAt":"2024-09-13T20:45:43+00:00","versionOfRecord":[],"versionCreatedAt":"2024-09-13 20:45:43","video":"","vorDoi":"","vorDoiUrl":"","workflowStages":[]},"version":"v1","identity":"rs-4927294","journalConfig":"researchsquare"},"__N_SSP":true},"page":"/article/[identity]/[[...version]]","query":{"redirect":"/article/rs-4927294","identity":"rs-4927294","version":["v1"]},"buildId":"qtupq5eGEP_6zYnWcrvyt","isFallback":false,"isExperimentalCompile":false,"dynamicIds":[84888],"gssp":true,"scriptLoader":[]}