The Role of Birth Companionship in Women’s Experiences of Mistreatment during Childbirth and Postpartum Depression

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-4.0
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-14

Full-time birth companionship, particularly informational support, was associated with reduced childbirth mistreatment and lower rates of postpartum anxiety and depression in rural Pakistan.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-14 · read from full text

This cross-sectional study analyzed survey data from 314 women in six public health facilities in rural Sindh, Pakistan, interviewing participants 42 days postpartum about characteristics of birth companionship during intrapartum care, experiences of mistreatment, and postpartum anxiety and depression. Women with higher companion support reported lower mistreatment, especially regarding non-confidential care, lack of supportive care, and ineffective communication; informational support was the strongest protective factor, and women with low support were 2.86 times more likely to report postpartum anxiety and depression. Path analysis indicated that the association between companion support and postpartum mental health was mediated by mistreatment experienced during childbirth. The paper does not specifically discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Introduction Birth companionship during facility-based childbirth has been recommended by the World Health Organization to improve maternal and newborn outcomes. However, limited evidence exists on how companionship affects women’s experiences of mistreatment during childbirth and their mental health. Objectives To assess the characteristics of birth companionship during intrapartum care and examine its associations with women’s experiences of mistreatment and postpartum anxiety and depression. Methods We analysed cross-sectional data on 314 women who gave birth in six public health facilities in rural Sindh, Pakistan. Women were interviewed 42 days postpartum about their childbirth experiences and postpartum anxiety and depression. Multivariable regression models were used to examine associations between birth companionship, mistreatment, and postpartum anxiety/depression. Path analysis explored whether mistreatment mediated the relationship between companionship and postpartum anxiety and depression. Results Most women (83.1%) had a full-time companion in the labor room, with in-laws (44.6%) being the most common, followed by family members (26.1%) and friends (15.0%). Higher levels of companion support were associated with lower levels of mistreatment, particularly regarding non-confidential care, lack of supportive care, and ineffective communication. Women receiving low companion support were 2.86 times more likely to experience postpartum anxiety and depression compared to those receiving high support. Informational support emerged as the strongest protective factor against both mistreatment and postpartum anxiety/depression. Path analysis revealed that the effect of companion support on postpartum mental health was mediated by experiences of mistreatment during childbirth. Conclusion Birth companionship, especially informational support, plays a crucial role in reducing mistreatment during childbirth and improving maternal mental health outcomes. These findings underscore the need for supportive policies and health system interventions that actively encourage the engagement of companions from a woman’s personal network during labor and childbirth. Future research should explore strategies to optimize the role of birth companions in promoting respectful maternity care and maternal well-being.
Full text 4,513 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 5 sections · click to expand

Abstract

Introduction Birth companionship during facility-based childbirth has been recommended by the World Health Organization to improve maternal and newborn outcomes. However, limited evidence exists on how companionship affects women’s experiences of mistreatment during childbirth and their mental health.

Objectives

To assess the characteristics of birth companionship during intrapartum care and examine its associations with women’s experiences of mistreatment and postpartum anxiety and depression.

Methods

We analysed cross-sectional data on 314 women who gave birth in six public health facilities in rural Sindh, Pakistan. Women were interviewed 42 days postpartum about their childbirth experiences and postpartum anxiety and depression. Multivariable regression models were used to examine associations between birth companionship, mistreatment, and postpartum anxiety/depression. Path analysis explored whether mistreatment mediated the relationship between companionship and postpartum anxiety and depression.

Results

Most women (83.1%) had a full-time companion in the labor room, with in-laws (44.6%) being the most common, followed by family members (26.1%) and friends (15.0%). Higher levels of companion support were associated with lower levels of mistreatment, particularly regarding non-confidential care, lack of supportive care, and ineffective communication. Women receiving low companion support were 2.86 times more likely to experience postpartum anxiety and depression compared to those receiving high support. Informational support emerged as the strongest protective factor against both mistreatment and postpartum anxiety/depression. Path analysis revealed that the effect of companion support on postpartum mental health was mediated by experiences of mistreatment during childbirth.

Conclusion

Birth companionship, especially informational support, plays a crucial role in reducing mistreatment during childbirth and improving maternal mental health outcomes. These findings underscore the need for supportive policies and health system interventions that actively encourage the engagement of companions from a woman’s personal network during labor and childbirth. Future research should explore strategies to optimize the role of birth companions in promoting respectful maternity care and maternal well-being. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest. Clinical Trial The study has been registered with clinicaltrials.gov (registration number: NCT05146518). Clinical Protocols https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0263635 Funding Statement Each authors’ time, named in the manuscript, is funded by Medical Research Council, United Kingdom. The Reference ID of the grant is: MR/T003375/1 The funders had and will not have a role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. Author Declarations I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained. Yes The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below: The study protocol, the informed consent forms, and other appropriate documents were approved by the Ethics Review Committee of the Aga Khan University (Ref. ID: 2019-1683-5607) and Research Ethics Committee of the London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (Ref. ID: 17886). I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals. Yes I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance). Yes I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable. Yes Data Availability Data will be available upon request

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2024) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-28T02:00:01.590549+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0