The Perspective of Christian Religious Student/Teacher in Kasongan, Central Kalimantan Towards the Concentration of Dialogue: A Study of Paulo Freire

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-4.0

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to explore the perspectives of teachers and students regarding opinions in the dialogue between teachers and students in three high schools in Kasongan. The main question is how students' and teachers' reactions to the teaching and learning process in and out of the classroom are affected the research method uses qualitative research with interview techniques to raise voices (narratives) that are not heard. The results of the verbatim transcript are then processed into factual statements, categories, and themes. Based on this theme, the author analyzes Paulo Freire's philosophy regarding conscientization (there are psychological conditions, namely low self-esteem and fear; social construction) in dialogue. The research subjects were representatives of students and teachers from three public and private high schools. According to a search of teachers at three high schools in Kasongan, dialogue is a consistent egalitarian trail that teachers lay for students, even though there are dual roles as teachers both inside and outside the classroom under certain conditions. However, the perspective of students is that the teacher is a person who is obeyed, thus bringing students into the network and lowering their self-esteem when having a dialogue with the teacher. Nevertheless, dialogue is still possible as long as the teacher positions himself as a traveling partner, so that dialogue is able to run in and out of the classroom.
Full text 621 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
There is a newer version available for this {{ publicationType }}. View latest version {{ publication.field_name }} {{ publication.subfield_name }} Copyright: © {{ publicationYear }} {{ publication.presentation_authors[0].full_name + (publication.presentation_authors.length > 1 ? ' et al' : '') }}. This is an open access publication distributed under the terms of the CC BY 4.0 License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Check the {{ publicationType | capitalize }} Source for copyright and license information. Listen on

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-19T01:45:01.086888+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-28T02:00:01.590549+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0