Concept-Based Force-Signature Analysis of Tool-Parameter Effects in Fine Blanking

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-4.0
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

Abstract Fine blanking part quality is highly sensitive to tool parameterization, yet cause–effect relationships are obscured by substantial process noise. This limits the utility of both simulation and scalar process metrics for tool optimization and mechanistic understanding. At the same time, high-resolution force-signature data is information-rich and can be used as evidence for learning physically plausible relationships, provided that interpretability is retained. This paper presents a data-to-knowledge pipeline combining finite element simulation, neural network prediction, and concept extraction to derive interpretable patterns from force time series and formulate mechanistic hypotheses linking tool parameters to die-roll formation. Controlled tool-parameter variation generates approximately 27,000 strokes with die-roll metrology. Neural networks predict die-roll height and tool parameters with mean absolute percentage errors of 0.6% and 2.6%, respectively. Concept extraction (ECLAD-ts) and segment-aware attribution localize predictive information to peak-load and post-peak regimes. For die-clearance variation, piecewise-linear analysis within concept windows identifies two mechanism-sensitive slope descriptors (Cliff's |δ| ≥ 0.83) with ordered progressions mirroring the graded die-roll response. The rising-flank slope captures clearance-dependent shearing resistance, while the post-peak decay slope reflects thermo-mechanical softening once crack growth initiates. Smaller clearance yields higher resistance, faster decay, and reduced die-roll height, consistent with forming theory. The pipeline enables phase-local assessment of tool-parameter effects under process noise and supports testable mechanistic hypotheses for simulation refinement.
Full text 14,400 characters · extracted from preprint-html · click to expand
Concept-based force-signature analysis of tool-parameter effects in fine blanking | Research Square window.SnipcartSettings = { analytics: { enabled: false } }; (function() { var accessVector = localStorage.getItem('access_vector') || ''; window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; if (accessVector) { window.dataLayer.push({ user: { profile: { profileInfo: { snid: accessVector } } } }); } })(); (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src='https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-K279D39R'); Browse Preprints In Review Journals COVID-19 Preprints AJE Video Bytes Research Tools Research Promotion AJE Professional Editing AJE Rubriq About Preprint Platform In Review Editorial Policies Our Team Advisory Board Help Center Sign In Submit a Preprint Cite Share Download PDF Research Article Concept-based force-signature analysis of tool-parameter effects in fine blanking Martin Unterberg, Daria Gelbich, Frank Schweinshaupt, Antonia Holzapfel, and 5 more This is a preprint; it has not been peer reviewed by a journal. https://doi.org/ 10.21203/rs.3.rs-8730577/v2 This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License Status: Posted Version 2 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Show more versions Abstract Fine blanking part quality is highly sensitive to tool parameterization, yet cause–effect relationships are obscured by substantial process noise. This limits the utility of both simulation and scalar process metrics for tool optimization and mechanistic understanding. At the same time, high-resolution force-signature data is information-rich and can be used as evidence for learning physically plausible relationships, provided that interpretability is retained. This paper presents a data-to-knowledge pipeline combining finite element simulation, neural network prediction, and concept extraction to derive interpretable patterns from force time series and formulate mechanistic hypotheses linking tool parameters to die-roll formation. Controlled tool-parameter variation generates approximately 27,000 strokes with die-roll metrology. Neural networks predict die-roll height and tool parameters with mean absolute percentage errors of 0.6% and 2.6%, respectively. Concept extraction (ECLAD-ts) and segment-aware attribution localize predictive information to peak-load and post-peak regimes. For die-clearance variation, piecewise-linear analysis within concept windows identifies two mechanism-sensitive slope descriptors (Cliff's |δ| ≥ 0.83) with ordered progressions mirroring the graded die-roll response. The rising-flank slope captures clearance-dependent shearing resistance, while the post-peak decay slope reflects thermo-mechanical softening once crack growth initiates. Smaller clearance yields higher resistance, faster decay, and reduced die-roll height, consistent with forming theory. The pipeline enables phase-local assessment of tool-parameter effects under process noise and supports testable mechanistic hypotheses for simulation refinement. Fine blanking Process noise Explainable AI XAI Concept extraction Predictive quality Deep learning Full Text Additional Declarations The authors declare no competing interests. Cite Share Download PDF Status: Posted Version 2 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Show more versions Research Square lets you share your work early, gain feedback from the community, and start making changes to your manuscript prior to peer review in a journal. As a division of Research Square Company, we’re committed to making research communication faster, fairer, and more useful. We do this by developing innovative software and high quality services for the global research community. Our growing team is made up of researchers and industry professionals working together to solve the most critical problems facing scientific publishing. Also discoverable on Platform About Our Team In Review Editorial Policies Advisory Board Help Center Resources Author Services Accessibility API Access RSS feed Manage Cookie Preferences © Research Square 2026 | ISSN 2693-5015 (online) Privacy Policy Terms of Service Do Not Sell My Personal Information {"props":{"pageProps":{"initialData":{"identity":"rs-8730577","acceptedTermsAndConditions":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"archivedVersions":[],"articleType":"Research Article","associatedPublications":[],"authors":[{"id":609608040,"identity":"e7ff99dc-88ec-4841-9c42-4035222dc767","order_by":0,"name":"Martin Unterberg","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Manufacturing Technology Institute (MTI) of RWTH Aachen University","correspondingAuthor":true,"prefix":"","firstName":"Martin","middleName":"","lastName":"Unterberg","suffix":""},{"id":609608041,"identity":"681a300c-c583-4bbc-b924-cbb69223ff31","order_by":1,"name":"Daria Gelbich","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Manufacturing Technology Institute (MTI) of RWTH Aachen University","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Daria","middleName":"","lastName":"Gelbich","suffix":""},{"id":609608042,"identity":"f26158ea-32de-43a7-bac2-a45f8529e658","order_by":2,"name":"Frank Schweinshaupt","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Manufacturing Technology Institute (MTI) of RWTH Aachen University","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Frank","middleName":"","lastName":"Schweinshaupt","suffix":""},{"id":609608043,"identity":"657059b9-85c4-4b02-b8e8-7b0ed2286147","order_by":3,"name":"Antonia Holzapfel","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Institute for Data Science in Mechanical Engineering (DSME) of RWTH Aachen University","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Antonia","middleName":"","lastName":"Holzapfel","suffix":""},{"id":609608044,"identity":"5f91d189-3a43-4b7b-8300-9cbb18e9c9ec","order_by":4,"name":"Daniyal Kazempour","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Department of Computer Science, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Daniyal","middleName":"","lastName":"Kazempour","suffix":""},{"id":609608045,"identity":"fc6db771-19b5-45cc-842c-4c804656c2df","order_by":5,"name":"Philipp Niemietz","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Manufacturing Technology Institute (MTI) of RWTH Aachen University","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Philipp","middleName":"","lastName":"Niemietz","suffix":""},{"id":609608046,"identity":"5489ead1-a5b1-4d30-8da8-5ed1dced6933","order_by":6,"name":"Peer Kröger","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Department of Computer Science, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Peer","middleName":"","lastName":"Kröger","suffix":""},{"id":609608047,"identity":"eb67fb44-4e08-4fda-9865-ad9c817ecedf","order_by":7,"name":"Sebastian Trimpe","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Institute for Data Science in Mechanical Engineering (DSME) of RWTH Aachen University","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Sebastian","middleName":"","lastName":"Trimpe","suffix":""},{"id":609608048,"identity":"f301efa1-72a0-47e6-9708-4ab73a023d59","order_by":8,"name":"Thomas Bergs","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Manufacturing Technology Institute (MTI) of RWTH Aachen University","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Thomas","middleName":"","lastName":"Bergs","suffix":""}],"badges":[],"createdAt":"2026-01-29 11:01:05","currentVersionCode":2,"declarations":{"humanSubjects":false,"vertebrateSubjects":false,"conflictsOfInterestStatement":false,"humanSubjectEthicalGuidelines":false,"humanSubjectConsent":false,"humanSubjectClinicalTrial":false,"humanSubjectCaseReport":false,"vertebrateSubjectEthicalGuidelines":false},"doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-8730577/v2","doiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-8730577/v2","draftVersion":[],"editorialEvents":[],"editorialNote":"","failedWorkflow":false,"files":[{"id":105235209,"identity":"e493a087-f443-454d-814c-fa50384d5b53","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2026-03-23 19:46:11","extension":"pdf","order_by":1,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"manuscript-pdf","size":2522377,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"Conceptbasedforcesignatureanalysisoftoolparametereffectsinfineblanking.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-8730577/v2_covered_582be1ac-42c8-46a2-9e37-33839904117c.pdf"}],"financialInterests":"The authors declare no competing interests.","formattedTitle":"Concept-based force-signature analysis of tool-parameter effects in fine blanking","fulltext":[],"fulltextSource":"","fullText":"","funders":[],"hasAdminPriorityOnWorkflow":false,"hasManuscriptDocX":false,"hasOptedInToPreprint":true,"hasPassedJournalQc":"","hasAnyPriority":true,"hideJournal":true,"highlight":"","institution":"Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft","isAcceptedByJournal":false,"isAuthorSuppliedPdf":true,"isDeskRejected":"","isHiddenFromSearch":false,"isInQc":false,"isInWorkflow":false,"isPdf":true,"isPdfUpToDate":true,"isWithdrawnOrRetracted":false,"journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true},"keywords":"Fine blanking, Process noise, Explainable AI, XAI, Concept extraction, Predictive quality, Deep learning","lastPublishedDoi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-8730577/v2","lastPublishedDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-8730577/v2","license":{"name":"CC BY 4.0","url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"manuscriptAbstract":"\u003cp\u003eFine blanking part quality is highly sensitive to tool parameterization, yet cause–effect relationships are obscured by substantial process noise. This limits the utility of both simulation and scalar process metrics for tool optimization and mechanistic understanding. At the same time, high-resolution force-signature data is information-rich and can be used as evidence for learning physically plausible relationships, provided that interpretability is retained. This paper presents a data-to-knowledge pipeline combining finite element simulation, neural network prediction, and concept extraction to derive interpretable patterns from force time series and formulate mechanistic hypotheses linking tool parameters to die-roll formation. Controlled tool-parameter variation generates approximately 27,000 strokes with die-roll metrology. Neural networks predict die-roll height and tool parameters with mean absolute percentage errors of 0.6% and 2.6%, respectively. Concept extraction (ECLAD-ts) and segment-aware attribution localize predictive information to peak-load and post-peak regimes. For die-clearance variation, piecewise-linear analysis within concept windows identifies two mechanism-sensitive slope descriptors (Cliff's |δ| ≥ 0.83) with ordered progressions mirroring the graded die-roll response. The rising-flank slope captures clearance-dependent shearing resistance, while the post-peak decay slope reflects thermo-mechanical softening once crack growth initiates. Smaller clearance yields higher resistance, faster decay, and reduced die-roll height, consistent with forming theory. The pipeline enables phase-local assessment of tool-parameter effects under process noise and supports testable mechanistic hypotheses for simulation refinement.\u003c/p\u003e","manuscriptTitle":"Concept-based force-signature analysis of tool-parameter effects in fine blanking","msid":"","msnumber":"","nonDraftVersions":[{"code":2,"date":"2026-03-23 19:45:28","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-8730577/v2","editorialEvents":[{"type":"communityComments","content":0}],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true}},{"code":1,"date":"2026-01-30 10:46:29","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-8730577/v1","editorialEvents":[{"type":"communityComments","content":0}],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true}}],"origin":"","ownerIdentity":"02eb7e71-422b-4d36-935b-64df27dfcf4d","owner":[],"postedDate":"March 23rd, 2026","published":true,"recentEditorialEvents":[],"rejectedJournal":[],"revision":"","amendment":"","status":"posted","subjectAreas":[],"tags":[],"updatedAt":"2026-01-30T10:46:29+00:00","versionOfRecord":[],"versionCreatedAt":"2026-03-23 19:45:28","video":"","vorDoi":"","vorDoiUrl":"","workflowStages":[]},"version":"v2","identity":"rs-8730577","journalConfig":"researchsquare"},"__N_SSP":true},"page":"/article/[identity]/[[...version]]","query":{"redirect":"/article/rs-8730577","identity":"rs-8730577","version":["v2"]},"buildId":"XKTyCvWXoU3ODBz1xrDgd","isFallback":false,"isExperimentalCompile":false,"dynamicIds":[84888],"gssp":true,"scriptLoader":[]}

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: preprint-html

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-28T02:00:01.590549+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0