Study on Rationality of Abdominal Hysterctomy With Its Clinical Correlations And Histopathological Outcome
This prospective study of 104 patients undergoing abdominal hysterectomy found leiomyoma and menorrhagia as the most frequent indication, with a complication rate of 24% attributed to improved surgical and antiseptic measures.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
This cross-sectional prospective study evaluated the clinical indications and histopathological outcomes of abdominal hysterectomies performed on 104 patients over a one-year period. The research identified leiomyoma as the most frequent indication, with menorrhagia being the primary complaint among participants aged primarily between 41 and 45 years. While complications occurred in 24% of cases, this rate was notably lower than previous studies, potentially due to improved surgical techniques and prophylactic antibiotic use. Relevance to endometriosis: pelvic endometriosis is listed as one of the inclusion criteria for hysterectomy in this cohort, though the paper's main focus is on the rationality of the procedure across various gynecological conditions.
Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
Full text
1,935 characters
· extracted from
oa-doi-fallback
· 2 sections
· click to expand
Abstract
Keywords
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works
Condition tags
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
Source provenance
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-06-04T00:00:01.174412+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-10-18T06:28:46.490043+00:00