Alcohol Treatment Preferences and the Acceptability of Virtual Reality Therapy for Treating Alcohol Misuse in Adult Drinkers
preprint
OA: closed
Abstract
Introduction Alcohol misuse affects a large part of the population worldwide, with high relapse rates reported even post-treatment. Treatments are also not always available, for example during the COVID-19 pandemic when social distancing measures affected the availability of in-person approaches. Novel treatments like Virtual Reality Therapy (VRT), delivered via a standard VR headset or a mobile device, may offer a flexible alternative for reducing drinking and assisting relapse prevention but little is known about their acceptability. Methods We therefore explored the acceptability of VRT alongside the treatment preferences of adult drinkers in an online survey. Participants were asked to consider and rank order a range of treatments typically offered by healthcare services alongside standard and mobile VRT in order to determine their relative preferences. Acceptability of each treatment was also established. Additional questions addressed potential predictors of VRT’s acceptability including familiarity with each treatment option presented, prior experience of VR, hazardous drinking, perceived stigma, treatment uptake attitudes, gender, ethnicity and mental health. Results Of 259 participants, more than half (52.9%) were drinking at hazardous levels. The majority of respondents (86.9%) expressed a preference for in-person treatments. Cognitive Behavioural Therapy, Counselling and 12-Step Facilitation Therapy were considered the most acceptable treatments whereas VRT and, particularly mobile VRT, were perceived as less acceptable than traditional treatments. Treatment familiarity and preferences, prior VR experience, mental health, treatment uptake attitudes and perceived stigma were all associated with the acceptability of VRT. Conclusions Psychoeducation and familiarisation processes in delivery protocols, and in-person delivery of VRT, could increase the acceptability of VRT, particularly for people who are not regular technology users, or who require concurrent mental health support.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-05-19T01:45:01.086888+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-06-13T06:42:57.164913+00:00