Comparative Study Between Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy And Abdominal Hysterectomy In Management Of Benign Gynecological Conditions
article
OA: diamond
CC0
Abstract
Background: In benign gynecological disorders, a laparoscopic hysterectomy may be preferable than an abdominal hysterectomy due to its possible benefits, such as shorter recovery times and less blood loss. Aim of the work: intended to evaluate the safety , benefits, and consequences of laparoscopic vs open hysterectomy for benign gynecological diseases. Methodology: 50 cases were subjected to a thorough medical history, physical examination, laboratory tests, abdominal ultrasound, and biopsies for suspicious pathology. cases separated into 2 groups of equal size. The 1st for trans-abdominal hysterectomy and the 2nd for complete LH. After surgery, patients were monitored for 6 months. Statistics obtained include surgical time, blood loss, comorbidities, and hospital stay duration. Results: Substantial improvements in low parity and low caesarean deliveries were observed in the laparoscopic group. In the laparoscopic group, adenomyosis was the most prevalent indication for hysterectomy (forty percent), followed by fibroids (twenty-eight percent). In the open group, fibroids were the most common indication (48percent), followed by adenomyosis (32percent). Contrasted to open hysterectomy, laparoscopic hysterectomy resulted in a much shorter duration of surgery (55 minutes vs. 70 minutes) and substantially less blood loss. The length of hospital stay was considerably shorter in the laparoscopic group as opposed to the open group (Mean± SD : 45.120 14.4 vs 59.52 ± 20.92 hours). Conclusion: When treating women with benign gynecological disorders, laparoscopic hysterectomy is preferable to abdominal hysterectomy because it is safe and has a higher success rate.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Condition tags
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
References (25)
- W116326842 via openalex
- W1533349220 via openalex
- W1971943425 via openalex
- W1993790913 via openalex
- W2046419229 via openalex
- W2053807041 via openalex
- W2093431342 via openalex
- W2101726195 via openalex
- W2122116681 via openalex
- W2257013802 via openalex
- W2321208332 via openalex
- W2395500614 via openalex
- W2469036486 via openalex
- W2564987135 via openalex
- W2788500046 via openalex
- W2902996777 via openalex
- W2921241478 via openalex
- W2981420432 via openalex
- W2983916771 via openalex
- W3165860659 via openalex
- W4233528468 via openalex
- W4285744389 via openalex
- W4302346410 via openalex
- W6691926740 via openalex
- W6700209067 via openalex
Source provenance
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-06-04T00:00:01.174412+00:00
License: CC0
· commercial use OK